970OC GTX or Quadro K2200 for 4K video editing in first?

Similar Questions

• I want to build a pc for better video editing with the soft first Adobe pro and Adobe after effect. Should what kind of material I buy for it. If you suggest me pls.

  I want to build a pc for better video editing with the soft first Adobe pro and Adobe after effect. Should what kind of material I buy for it. If you suggest me pls. my budget is about $2500

  You will have problems in the construction of a 99 X system for this budget. You need 32 GB of ram if you do that will be a large part of the cost with DDR4 right now. If you have a room on the X 99 budget would certainly be the way forward. The 5960 X is the best processor out right now but $1100 will probably push your budget. The 5930 K would still work and a much better price for your budget. I suggest: 970GTX with this budget as well. Forget the Xeon V3. They are out of your budget and not worth the price with this budget in mind. You can get a system much better with the I7 Haswell E chips.

  Eric

  ADK

• Best imac for the video editing and graphic design and recording of gameplay

  Hey guys I'm looking for the best imac laptop or desktop for video editing and recording of gameplay with capture card so if you are familiar with the desktop imac or laptop please leave commect to the best imac computer

  and care to capture the card to operate at its best

  • OS X 10.9 or later version
  • 2nd generation Intel Core i5 CPU (i5-2xxx or comparable), 2 Ghz or higher, before Turbo Boost
  • 4 GB of total RAM installed (or higher)
  • Built-in USB2.0 port

  I put spec for you guys can work find best computer imac

  Looking for a new or a used computer?

• Correspondence of time remapping with ramps for video editing of first CC 2015/output

  I would like to ask experts, which will be the best workflow...

  Location:

  I have the project with 50 + video segments where I have to slow down part of the clip to highlight some details (in my case - CIRC. enduro motorcycle - need to slow down the part where is visible some technical riding etc.).

  I use bulit Premiere Pro CC 2015 in the tools of the keyframe to select two points between where I change the speed for example at 50%. First has nice handles around the keyframes where I can create smooth ramp, so the change in speed is graduated.

  Insofar as simple here s

  But the first will not do the same with audio track associated with each clip. In the audio is for his example of the motorcycle.

  I need to have his original when the video is playing at 100% speed and its different from "lower pitch" when is slowed down and once again normal sound when is 100% video speed on the end.

  So I edited each audio segment to the points of the time remap keyframes, manually set the speed of the middle section and - it s horrible. Video slows gently while it is quite annoying audio changes.

  I need to make the same effect as what we were doing with Ribbon old VCRs in television production - smooth audio ramp corresponding to the video and return to full speed.

  As my knowledge about hearing is close to zero - I would like to ask at the front to start learning - I can do up in the hearing? What I have to do it every time from scratch or can I use existing keys from first images? Anyway how above 'automatic '? What workflow you have advice when I need to do it quite often many of these clips?

  Thank you much for the help.

  P. S. tried to find out, after a while with the help chat online too...

  Most of the discussions and tutorials is very old - there may be some new features in CC 2015 in order to do compare with 2011 toolset or almost. And in many video tutorials only covered - they talk about audio at all. But for audio track that I use, is the audio very good.

  Here is an example of a part of the timeline. I needed this project to do quickly, I decided to stretch the entire audio segments to match the new length of the video. It s not correct but it sounds better then it divides in three parts with a slow speed in the middle. Just to match audio speed changes in the Panel of video editing

  

  Not sure about the exchange of workflow with first for this type of effect.

  However the hearing can make the effect of change of speed/not very well using effects/time and Pitch/Pitch Bender. This uses a waveform envelope on with keyframes to vary the height must therefore ideal for your needs. In order to see where on the waveform, you need to place keyframes without doubt the best way is to place markers on audio in first at beginning and end of each ramp. These should be done through when you export audio in Audition where you should be able to match Pitch Bend keyframes to markers.

• SSD FOR THE VIDEO EDITING - NTFS OR EXFAT?

  I just installed a "Samsung Electronics 840 Pro Series 2.5 inch 256 GB SATA 6 GB/s Solid State Drive MZ-7PD256BW ' on my Dell Precision T1700 Workstation running Microsoft Windows 8 Pro and Adobe Creative Cloud.

  I intend to use the SSD strictly for video editing with Adobe Premiere Pro CC. should I format the drive using NTFS or exFAT?

  Thanks for your help!

  NTFS, it's what you want to use.

  Eric

  ADK

• Problems during video editing in first items 10

  Hi all.

  First that it is the plug of the work computer, that I am running:

  Intel Core 2 Duo CPU E8500 @ 3,17 Ghz

  8.00 GB OF RAM

  64-bit Windows

  I am currently using first items 10 and I'm having serious problems with the delivery of the program. I am currently adding text to a video step by step for the media to play on a screen in silence.

  When I try and scroll through the timeline, even slightly my whole items is fortification GAL, my screen freezes for a few seconds then jumps way more far down the teamline when I wanted to work. When I preview the video I get the same problem, the video GAL and I see basically is random images. After a while the delay will get progressively more slowly before crashing. The system I use is new and contains F-Secure anti-virus software, so I doubt that could be the problem and I have a naked system without background running programs.

  I read that some people have problems with 64-bit elements. I hope someone can give me a light head .

  See you soon

  Jamie Steel

  Make your timeline (press enter) every time you see a red line above your clips and it won't be a problem. When you have green lines above your clips, the program is able to use pre-rendered for your perusal, relieve your system to do so many things in the RAM.

• Copy of a video edited in first items 10

  Hi, I'm looking to take down a clip and repeat several times. I know how to cut the clip down to the pictures I want, now I'm looking for copy and repeat several times in the timeline panel.

  Thank you.

  Select the item and then choose copy (Ctrl + C on PC), move the CTI (time current indicator/head) to the desired location and paste (Ctrl + V on PC). Repeat, paste, after moving from the CTI, as needed.

  Good luck

  Hunt

  PS - can also be used as to the effects of copying and pasting from one Clip to another, or several. The destination just clip must be selected, then Rt click on / them and choose Paste attributes.

• Mac Pro: more RAM or better video card for video editing?

  I'm going to buy a new Mac Pro for video editing in first Pro CC, but can't decide if I should ad more cores, more RAM or a better graphics card.

  Intend to change the RED 4 K files.

  Hello

  I'm certinaly not an engineer who can comment on how applications are written and how can hearts of processor they can write effectly, but there has been a lot of comments to the Mac Pro (new), and to answer your question, based on what I read, there were comments that the 8 basic model is good for video editing - not too , nor too little.

  Being an editor, I'd always put my money to get the best graphics cards and the largest amount of RAM that you can afford.  For work, we've been specing on new models and it was the 'formula' we follow.  With the exception of the RAM, sounds like once you buy, your clerks to the material with the new machines.

  I found the review below to be a great resource that can help answer your question.

  AnandTech | The Mac Pro Review (end 2013)

  Hope that helps and good luck with your purchase.

• Best setting for creating video in LR

  First of all I isn't about creating a video of Raw still photos in LR.   Actually two different subjects;

  (1) issue with MP4 - I have news for all settings, the formats to do this.  I created a MP4 1080 p with music and it worked well on Win7 OS but not on XP or Vista... The audio has not played correctly.      I might be able to live with that, but I would like to know if it would solve the audio problem to create 1080 p or 720 p? a compromise in quality? ... I'm a real beginner in this field...     Photos videos I've ever seen were not good quality, but this created high quality.

  (2) another question - what format/arrangement in LR to create a DVD with audio that could be played in a unit not Blu Ray... I want to be able to use a large TV with DVD player...    Can I use video to create or make a slideshow with audio and what setting...   I know I have to do some reading...    I'm a little under the gun to get treatment results and since I have so many pictures, they will be good for this sort of thing vs. providing JPEG images quite normal.

  Thank you.

  Regarding playback of video files on different operating systems it is more dependent on the player you use and the video card, as the OS that you are using. On windows systems windows media player must manage HD formats as long as your video card is up to, if you have problems to download VLC media player (just google it) because it will play anything you throw at it.

  Video output LR is very limited (and in my opinion a waste of time), if you really want to integrate still images into a video format would do you better to use a video editing rather than the release of LR application. For the best quality of still images slideshow, you'd also better be showing slideshows directly using LR itself or PDF as same HD video will be just far corresponding to a photographic image quality always. If you want to mix still and moving images, then I would crop and export as TIFF 8-bit images and import them into the application where you can have a lot more control over editing video. On Mac, i-Film is good enough for basic video editing. Unfortunately on windows you can really buy a request the free windows application is useless. The elements of Prime Minister is a pretty good choice.

  If you do not want to use the video exported directly from setting LR HD is 1080 p or 720 p and it would require a Blue Ray disc play properly. HD 1080 p gives a format 16:9 with a maximum width of 1920pxs, 720 p 1280 x 720pxs. To make a standard DVD, you use the output 720 x 440 (rather than two HD formats) and then will need you a DVD authoring application to actually burn the DVD.

  In addition, I have an a couple of tests on the HD output LR slide compared to using elements of Prime Minister. I'll post to Vimeo and put links once they show themselves. One point emerges immediately, even without sound, the slide show even is 20% larger LR only emitted by elements using the parameters of compression recommended Vimeo in both cases. Played on my machine directly the Elements version also looks better, if this will show also online I don't know until they have downloaded and rendered.

  Here is the version of LR... .play to full screen and you can see the problems.

  Here is the version made in elements of Prime Minister, which is much better (and a smaller file).

• Preview the video in Adobe first Pro CC stutters badly all playing on a portable powerful

  I bought 4 months ago relatively powerful computer laptop specially for my needs of video editing with first Pro CC, but so far it has been very frustrating experience.

  Lenovo Y40-80

  Intel i7-5500U

  16 GB OF RAM

  SSD 512 GB

  AMD Radeon R9 M275 4 GB

  Screen LCD 1920 x 1080

  Play timeline (4K clips without any effect applied) in the window saccade preview so bad that it is almost impossible to use the software. Reading is relatively smooth 3-5 seconds and after that it significantly slows down to 2-3 frames per second (the other images are deleted).

  I tried all the latest AMD Catalyst, including the version beta drivers. Complained about the AMD forum. Reduces the resolution of reading from 1/2 to 1/8 with no visible effect. In fact even the discreet GPU through the BIOS turn off have not declined over the playback speed. Passage of the first CC (2014) to CC (2015) doesn't change anything either.

  Interestingly enough, feature as 4K quality export works well enough, with a speed comparable to my office for 4 years. The office manages very well the process of edition, and based on the specifications of the laptop must have about the same performance as the office.

  Suggestions, please?

  your cpu is one of the scam i7 from intel. It is a core 2 and not 4 core performance is cut in half compared to the 4 core i7 about the same price. for comparison, your cpu is the same speed as an office i3 cpu. You can try to sell the lenovo and get an i7 core 4 with a gtx 970 m or 980 m.

• Help upgrading from a current PC to video editing standards?

  My current office is a matter of school Lenovo ThinkCentre M80 with the following specifications:

  • Intel (r) Core i5 CPU 650 @ 3.20 GHz
  • 4.00 GB RAM
  • NVIDIA GeForce 310
  • 1 x 300 GB hard drive
  • Windows 7 Premium 32-bit

  I don't have a ton of money, but I recently had subsequently CS6 as a gift and hope to update my existing computer. I'll use this for HD video editing and photo DSLR editing. I thought to add/change:

  • GeForce GTX 470
  • 16 GB of total RAM
  • Upgrade to Windows 8 Pro
  • 1-2 to 7200 to 10000 RPM

  This will cut it? Any suggestions for a machine entry of video editing based on a budget? Should I just started from scratch? Thank you.

  > build a machine with a budget of video editing entry?

  What is your budget?

  I have ideas for 3 levels of awards in http://www.pacifier.com/~jtsmith/ADOBE.HTM

  And there are MANY more ideas in these discussions

  -PC to build http://forums.adobe.com/thread/947698

  -2 How to build videos http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1104182

  -Planning & http://ppbm7.com/index.php/intro-part-1 of construction

  -memory for LGA2011 http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1098759

  -a FAQ Adobe http://forums.adobe.com/thread/878520

  -http://www.shawnlam.ca/2012/premiere-pro-cs6-video-editing-computer-build/

  -http://www.videoguys.com/Guide/E/Videoguys+DIY9+Its+Time+for+Sandy+Bridge+E/0xe9b142f408a2 b03ab88144a434e88de7.aspx

  -several other links http://forums.adobe.com/thread/815798

• When Adobe change a Cuda_Supported_Cards for Adobe Premiere Pro CS6 for Quadro K2200, Quadro M4000 and M5000 Quadro Quadro M6000

  Dear Sirs, as a user of Adobe software, I bought the Adobe Production Premium CS5.5 for much money, after I purchased an upgrade for the Adobe Production Premium CS6.

  For my part, I see no need to upgrade to Adobe Creative cloud that these packages are not enough for me and my hobby.

  If so, you accept me as a good customer, Wouln't edit you an update in the GPUsniffer.exe and the 'cuda_supported_cards' and 'raytracer_suported_cards' to the current criteria.

  Adobe Production Premium CS6 is always available in the Adobe store, how did Adobe doesnot keep their software up to date?

  I plan to buy one of the cards mentioned above, Quadro K2200 or Quadro M4000 appear not on the list.

  My PNY Quadro 4000 last year broke down, 2 weeks before my warranty expired, but did not have a support or replacement of PNY.

  So I lost again €900,00.

  Mr President will consider you my question?

  While it is still sold, CS6 is OUT of USE and is no longer supported or updated

  creation http://blogs.adobe.com/premiereprotraining/2011/02/CUDA-Mercury-playback-Engine-and-Adobe--pro.html

  If your nVidia card at least 1Gig of video ram, use the nVidia Hack http://forums.adobe.com/thread/629557 - which is a simple entry in a 'support for the cards' file - and Mac http://www.vidmuze.com/how-to-enable-gpu-cuda-in-adobe-cs6-for-mac/

• For the Ultra HD / 4K / HEVC / H.265 video editing: GTX 960 or 980 Ti GTX?

  How is it important to have a hardware video-enabled-decoding card?

  I am deciding to buy GTX 960 or 980 it GTX for Ultra HD video editing.

  The GTX 960 uses GM206 which has only 2 GB of memory, but includes based video decoding hardware.

  The GTX 980 it uses GM200 which includes NO video decoding, but has 6 GB of memory and the together better statistics:

  www.Game-Debate.com/GPU/index.php?gid=2935 & gid2 = 2813 compare=GeForce-GTX-980-TI-6GB-vs-GE force-gtx-960-2 GB - sli

  For games, the GTX 980 it is 'extremely better' than the 960 GTX:

  http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-980-Ti-vs-Nvidia-GTX-960/3439vs3165

  Therefore, not for games, but for ultra HD video rendering, compatible more than make up for the worst overall performance hardware decoding?

  From a web forum: "only the GPU GM206 used in the GTX 960 supports full FIXED material HEVC decoding function. The GM200 used in the GTX 980 Ti and Titan X didn't, and the GM204 used in the GTX 970/980 also does not. »

  From a site of the magazine: 'we tested different video files on a GTX 960 H.265. Reading has been impeccable for each and every one of them, with only negligible CPU load, which means that they were handled entirely by the GPU. Reading files Ultra HD H.265 revealed no problem either. »

  Would the Ti 980 provide also "impeccable" reading of files of the Ultra HD H.265, even without hardware compatible decoding?

  Also, perhaps more fundamentally, the 960 even manages Ultra HD? From another site: "If you want to enjoy 4K game, then you will need to invest in a more expensive GPU Setup. For NVIDIA, the choice users clear right now is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti. »

  Because I need to return and then read on the computer I see huge video projects, do I need, more memory/hearts (980 Ti) or hardware compatible decoding (960)?

  Thank you!

  Material HEVC decoding/encoding is not supported in Premiere Pro, so that "advantage" is questionable.

  For the rest, read Page Tweakers - what to use video card

• Number of CPU cores required (Virtual vs. physical) for video editing 4 K Prime Minister?

  Hi all.

  About to start my own business / video editing. I'm doing a customized version of PC. I am considering a motherboard very processor dual Xeon with maybe 64 GB of RAM and a certified Quadro 4 GB or 8 GB GPU. The 4 k I intend to work on commercials under 15 long minutes, will take place with an average of 3 video tracks and 2 audio tracks.

  When it comes to running Adobe Premier Pro 5.5 or 6 (for 4K editing video and rendering), I read that it is recommended to have 12 hearts in each of the two processors. (The PDF I read was an official guide of 2015 from Intel: "Hardware Performance Guide: serious 4 K editing ')

  Now, I wonder if this figure of 12 cores per processor is related to PHYSICAL cores, or ALL hearts including VIRTUAL cores (.. .If it is referred to all the hearts, so I just need to buy two 6 core processors, giving a total of 24 cores can be used.) Big price difference between a 6 core CPU and a 12 core...

  The Xeon series which will be compatible with my MB is the 2600 CPU of the E5 v3 family. Stories of advice or that popular horror...!

  Paul.

  guide intel suggests probably 12 real hearts, possibly the v3 of E5-2680. It would be double Xeon 24/48 virtual hearts.

  software Adobe does not need the features on the quadro, using the version of game/Office nvidia gtx can help save money.

  If you need 10 bit out for the color correction, view maps of mfg as blackmagic, aja and others may be a better option.

  have you already bought the motherboard?

  Hardware requirements may vary for different types of media and project as multi-cam configurations. codecs like h264/5 are very difficult for the processor process and the gpu should be handled, but first does not currently support gpu accelerated encoding/decoding. This is what can lead to dual xeons as intel recommends. Dual cpu also have large overhead, reducing their combined processing power. Another reason why intel may recommend the 12 core dual processor. If you use the less demanding codecs such as prores or dnxhr, UC must be as powerful, and can even be possible to use a single processor. Some people transcode their sequences of difficult codecs like h264/5 prores or dnxhr as a whole work rather than buy a more powerful system to manage h264/5 when editing.

  Hackers Page - Video Codecs

  Intel PDF: "Hardware Performance Guide: serious 4 K editing."

  It is important to note that software engineers need to write specific code to take advantage of some features like multiple nuclei (multithreading) and virtual cores (hyper-threading). Consumer applications such as Adobe Premiere Pro and Adobe After Effects already take full advantage of these features.

  If you check that the tests carried out here: Tweakers Page - decide between one processor or dual CPU and read through the discussions here and other websites, you will find the results against this last sentence. software Adobe has long had problems fully multi-threads, the first is not as bad as some of the other adobe programs but can still have problems.

• What should I choose for film/video publishing house?

  My old dell is too slow now and I'm looking for a new... maybe the XPS 8600

  I need a computer that will manage the video/photo montage.  I used the Director, but understand that is no longer included with Windows, so I need to find a comparable software video editing (of suggestions) program?

  I want an i7, 16GB, Windows 7 (don't like 8), video card(suggestions please).

  Can anyone who makes video editing help me?

  I have a MAC... it a great computer except for imovie... It stinks!

  Thank you

  Dee

  Hi Dee,

  Latest version of Dell XPS 8500 was and then came XPS 8500 Special Edition - enhanced. It is a powerful system of performance.
  It comes with:
  -3rd generation Intel Core i7-3770 (up to 3.90 GHz) processor
  -16GB Dual Channel DDR3 1600 MHz - 4 DIMMs
  -2 TB 7200 RPM SATA hard drive + Intel SRT 32 GB SSD Cache

  About the video card, you can choose one of the following:
  -NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 1.5 GB GDDR5
  -AMD Radeon HD 7870 2GB GDDR5
  -AMD Radeon HD 7770 2GB GDDR5

  I would also like to inform you about the operating system. These days, all Dell computers come with Windows8. However, if you don't want windows8 and want the system comes with Windows7, you can contact our sales team (Click-to-Chat (24/7) or call the 1-877-717-3355) and place the order according to your needs.
  * NOTE: The option to choose Windows7 as operating system is not available for online purchases.

  Please write again for any other question.