Access remote vpn for the cisco1841

Similar Questions

• configuration problem pix515 to access remote vpn using the vpn client

  Hello

  My chart is simple:

  a client pc with customer vpn cisco 3.X

  try to connect to a remote site via a pix 515E.

  What happened:

  the pc can connect, the pix give it an ip address, but no traffic not encrypted so no access to the remote network.

  My config is:

  ---------------------------------------

  START THE CONFIG

  --------------------------------------

  access-list 102 permit ip 192.168.80.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0

  IP local pool clientpool 10.10.10.5 - 10.10.10.50

  NAT (inside) - 0 102 access list

  Permitted connection ipsec sysopt

  Crypto ipsec transform-set robust esp - esp-md5-hmac

  Crypto-map dynmap 10 transform-set robust Dynamics

  map mymap 10-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic dynmap

  mymap outside crypto map interface

  ISAKMP allows outside

  ISAKMP identity address

  part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 10

  encryption of ISAKMP policy 10

  ISAKMP policy 10 md5 hash

  10 2 ISAKMP policy group

  ISAKMP life duration strategy 10 86400

  vpngroup address clientpool pool vpn30002

  vpngroup password 123daniel456789 vpn30002

  vpngroup split tunnel 102 vpn30002

  -------------------------------------

  END CONFIG

  -------------------------------------

  Please help me!

  Concerning

  Can you upgrade to a new vpn client or try to disable the firewall in XP sp 2? I think the problem is that this old clients are not supported on xp sp2 or will have problems with the firewall in SP2. Try to run a higher customer or 4.0 x.

• You try to run a Site to site VPN and remote VPN from the same IP remotely

  We currently have a site to site VPN configuration between our offices call center and a 3rd party that allows them to access our training to their employees to use environment while being trained on our systems. This tunnel is running between our ASA and their ASA without problem; However, when we have managers come out to the call center, they are unable to use remote VPN to access our office.

  Apparently the same IP peer remote that we use for our site to the other tunnel is the same IP that our managers use to access the internet when they are on-site with the customer. When I look at the logs it shows the VPN attempt and then I get treatment Information Exchange has failed. So from what I can understand when our managers are trying to connect to our firewall from the same IP address as the counterpart of site to site it automatically tries to create a tunnel, according to the information of the site to the other tunnel. If our managers are anywhere else, they can connect through remote VPN with no problems.

  My question is if anyone knows of a way to make the firewall allow VPN site to site and remote connections with the same remote IP address.

  Hi John,.

  Basically, in older versions, when you hit a static encryption card and you does not match this static encryption completely map the connection continues until the dynamic encryption card. For this reason, you can connect your IPSec clients before. A bug has been opened on this vulnerability.

  CSCuc75090  Details of bug

  The crypto IPSec Security Association are created by dynamic crypto map to static peers

  Symptom:

  When a static VPN peer adds all traffic to the ACL crypto, a surveillance society is based even if the pair IP is not allowed in the acl to the main façade encryption. Are these SA finally put in correspondence and commissioning the dynamic crypto map instance.

  Conditions:

  It was a planned design since the first day that allowed customers to fall through in the case of static crypto map did not provide a necessary cryptographic services.

  The SA must be made from a peer configured statically and a dynamic crypto map instance must be configured on the receiving end.

  Workaround solution:

  N/A

  Some possible workarounds are:

  Configure a static nat device when you try to use the remote VPN if the firewall remotely will be hit with a different public IP address. It would be a good solution, but it will depend on how many ip addresses public you have available, if you really want one of these ip addresses for that access.

  Also, I thought you could use AnyConnect instead of the IPSec VPN client. I don't know how many users need to connect from your PC to the remote site, but the ASA has 2 licenses SSL available that you could use. Because Anyconnect uses the SSL protocol, it won't have a problem on your environment.

  Below some information:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/ASA/asa84/configuration/guide/asa_84_cli_config/vpn_anyconnect.html

  Hope this helps,

  Luis.

• 2 VPN SITE to SITE with ACCESS REMOTE VPN

  Hello

  I have a 870 router c and I would like to put 2 different VPN SITE to SITE and access remote VPN (VPN CLIENTS) so is it possible to put 3 VPN in the router even if yes can u give me the steps or the sample configuration

  Concerning

  Thus, on the routers will be:

  

  Cisco 2611:

  LAN: 10.10.10.0/24

  access-list 100 permit ip 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 10.10.20.0 0.0.0.255
  

  access-list 100 permit ip 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 10.10.20.0 0.0.0.255--> VPNPOOL

  !

  10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map clientmap

  defined by peer 172.18.124.199

  match address 100

  !

  IP local pool ippool 14.1.1.1 14.1.1.254

  !

  access-list 120 allow ip 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255
  

  access-list 120 allow ip 10.10.20.0 0.0.0.255 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 --> NETWORK REMOTE
  

  !

  crypto ISAKMP client configuration group ra-customer
  

      pool ippool

  ACL 120

  !

  Please note that the configuration is incomplete, I added that relevant changes, you should bring to the allow clients of RA through the LAN-to-LAN tunnel, of course, the LAN-to-LAN settings should match to the other side of the tunnel that is mirror of ACL, NAT and so on.

  HTH,

  Portu.

• I rented the room light $5 9.99 per month.  Can I also get access to Photoshop for the same rental?   In my previous cat (0216813226), I said yes and gave a link to download Photoshop.  I let it run all night and it never down loaded even if

  I rented the room light $5 9.99 per month.  Can I also get access to Photoshop for the same rental?   In my previous cat (0216813226), I said yes and gave a link to download Photoshop.  I let it run all night and it never down load even though it says 'download now '.

  Hi dave04079,

  Yes, you also get access to install Photoshop on your computer when a member of the creative cloud.

  So I recommend that you please complete the creative process (Windows) Task Manager Cloud and activity monitor (MAC) and then reopen creative cloud.

  Sign to the creative cloud, then go ahead and install Photoshop.

  Kind regards

  Tanuj

• Divide access remote vpn tunnel ASA 5520

  Hello

  I'm setting up a vpn for remote access with split tunnel, but I use an acl extended to match a host and http to destination port, but does not work.

  Scenario of

  Distance access(10.0.0.122/24)--internet---Cisco ASA(inside:192.168.10.1/24)---ip = 192.168.10.6 - C6509 - 10.0.0.254/24---hote = 10.0.0.31/24

  The plot is when I activate the IP service connection or flow ICMP worked. Does anyone have an idea what is the problem? Thank you

  Concerning

  Split tunneling does not take into account the port information you specify in the ACL, he doesn't care the ip address/network you defined.

  If you want to restrict access to ports and IP, you must define your split tunneling with only ip addresses and using a vpn-filter acl in group policy to restrict following the specific ports that you want:

  split_acl ip access list allow

  access-list allowed filter_acl ip eq

  attributes of group-pol

  Split-tunnel-pol tunnelspecified

  value of Split-tunnel-net split_acl

  VPN-filter value filter_acl

  -heather

• access remote vpn with ldap

  Hi all

  IM, configuration of a vpn for remote access with ldap, for what I see in some examples, I need to create a user/pass.

  In my case, I already configured the aaa for the ldap Protocol Server. I also have the Group tunnl with the authentication server.

  I need to create a user/pass?

  Thank you.

  Hello

  I see what you mean!

  It is not necessary for the integration of LDAP.

  You don't have authentication LDAP not the LOCAL database, so no need for this.

  Do not forget to rate all my answers

  Julio Carvajal
  Main and specialist of the Core network security
  CCIE #42930, 2-CCNP JNCIS-SEC
  For immediate assistance commit to http://i-networks.us

• 1920 router access remote vpn LDAP living

  Hello

  What is required for a router in 1920 use AnyConnect and/or also integrate with AD LDAP?

  Currently, this router supports legacy clients and has these licenses:

  Technology for the Module package license information: "c1900".

  -----------------------------------------------------------------
  Technology-technology-package technology
  Course Type next reboot
  ------------------------------------------------------------------
  IPBase ipbasek9 ipbasek9 Permanent
  Security securityk9 Permanent securityk9
  given none none none

  The vpn to access remote client inherited integrate with AD LDAP?

  Thank you.

  As long as you are on IOS 15.3.3M3 or better, you have all the licenses you need for 3.1 AnyConnect run on your 1921.

  The guide to directly connect your router to LDAP can be found here:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/iOS-XML/iOS/sec_usr_ldap/configuration/15-Mt/sec-usr-LDAP-15-Mt-book/sec_conf_ldap.html

  Personally, I would avoid directly interfacing with LDAP, because it can be a complex arrangement. While it can be done, it's easier to have your router to connect to the NPS Microsoft via RADIUS server for your authentication.

• a public access remote vpn from an inside interface asa 5505

  I'm trying to see if it is possible to accomplish what I am trying. I have an ASA 5505 with the following configuration.

  1. There is an external connection, connected to the ISP. Let's say that it is 10.1.1.1/24 for ease. There is a remote VPN configuration as the access of people through this interface.

  2. There's the inside network, which is the normal LAN. It's cable system in the office. to say that it is 172.20.0.1/24.

  3. There is a wireless network on a VLAN separate called WLAN. It has an IP of 192.168.1.1/24. There is an ACL allowing traffic to that VLAN to the public internet.

  Essentially, I would like users to be able to use the same VPN settings they use when connecting from outside of the Office when you are connected to WIFI.

  Also, I would like that they can access public IP addresses that I have NAT would be to internal servers. In this way, they can use IP addresses when they use on the public internet.

  Is this possible?

  Hello

  Well that's not going to be possible, the only thing you can really do is to activate the crypto map on the WLAN facing interface, by design, you cannot not access VPN, ping or manage the device on an interface which is not directly connected to you.

  I hope this helps.

  Mike

• Access remote VPN, no split tunneling, internet access. Translation NAT problem

  Hi all, I'm new to the forum.  I have a Cisco ASA 5505 with confusing (to me) question NAT.

  Unique external IP (outside interface) with several translations of NAT static object to allow the redirection of port of various internal devices.  The configuration worked smoothly during the past years.

  Recently, I configured a without the split tunneling VPN remote access and access to the internet and noticed yesterday that my port forwarding has stopped working.

  I reviewed the new rules for the VPN NAT and found the culprit.

  I've been reviewing the rules again and again, and all I can think about and interpret it, I don't know how this rule affects the port forwarding on the device or how to fix.

  Here's the NAT rules, I have in place: ('inactive' rule is the culprit.  Once I have turn on this rule, the port forwarding hits a wall)

  NAT (inside, outside) static source any any static destination VPN_Subnet VPN_Subnet non-proxy-arp-search to itinerary
  NAT (outside, outside) static source VPN_Subnet VPN_Subnet VPN_Subnet VPN_Subnet non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination
  NAT (outside, outside) source VPN_Subnet dynamic interface inactive
  !
  network obj_any object
  NAT dynamic interface (indoor, outdoor)
  network of the XXX_HTTP object
  NAT (inside, outside) interface static tcp www www service
  Access-group outside_access_in in interface outside
  Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 1

  Any help would be appreciated.

  Try changing the nat rule to VPN_Subnet interface of nat (outside, outside) the after-service automatic dynamic source

  With respect,

  Safwan

• AnyConnectVPN users cannot access remote vpn site-to-site

  Hello-

  We have two 5510 s ASA one in 8.4 (4) and the other to 8.2 (5) in a site to site VPN configuration. All internal traffic is working smoothly.

  A: site/subnet 192.160.0.0 - local (8.4 (4)) Site/subnet b: 192.260.0.0 - distance (8.2 (5)) VPN users: 192.160.40.0 - assigned by ASA

  When you VPN into the network, all the hits of traffic A Site and everything on the subnet A is accessible.

  However, the site B is totally inaccessible to users of VPN. All computers on subnet B, the firewall itself, etc. is not reachable by ping or otherwise.

  There are also some NAT rules weird that I'm not happy with that were created after that I upgraded the Site to ASA to 8.4

  A resident of the site: external 192.160.x.x: 55.55.555.201(main)/202(mail)

  Site B (in addition to site to site) is external 192.260.x.x: 66.66.666.54 (all)

  I've pretty much just the basic rules of the NAT for VPN, Email, Internet and site to site.

  What I need to add for the VPN access to the network from site to site?

  Here is my config NAT:

  NAT (inside, outside) static source DOMAIN_LOCAL DOMAIN_LOCAL VPN_Network VPN_Network non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination

  NAT (inside, outside) static source DOMAIN_LOCAL DOMAIN_LOCAL DOMAIN_REMOTE DOMAIN_REMOTE non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination

  !

  network of the DMZ_Network object

  dynamic NAT interface (DMZ, outside)

  network of the DOMAIN_LOCAL object

  NAT dynamic interface (indoor, outdoor)

  network of the EXCHANGE_Exchange object

  NAT static Outside_Mail (any, any)

  network of the DOMAINCTRL_DHCP object

  NAT (inside, outside) interface static tcp ftp ftp service

  Thank you very much in advance and I hope that I've been pretty thorough.

  Let me know if you need anything that anyone else. Thank you!!

  Theo,

  You don't need the NAT rules outside (depending on your configuration).

  Basically, you need to add the pool VPN L2L traffic and network remote to the ACL of split tunneling (if configured), also the "permit same-security-traffic intra-interface".

  Please let me know.

  Thank you.

• Access remote vpn fails

  Hello

  Im trying to figure out why vpn for remote access is at our company office fails. The scenario: we currently have a work situation. The way this works is that users connect to the public ip address of the DSL router and nat vpn traffic to an internal router. This router then forwards the traffic to the vpn server.

  vpn client remote <=>{{internet}} <=>cpe <=>adsl router <=>vpn server

  Now, Im implementation of a 2nd internet line with more or less the same configuration, but instead of an adsl cpe, we use a cisco router. When users need to connect even with the only difference being a different public ip address

  client remote vpn <=>{{internet}} <=>cisco <=>router <=>router, vpn server

  So, the only change in the prepective of cisco vpn clients is the host.  However when testing, it didn't work. The vpn client times out. With something like 'the vpn peer did not' do not remember the exact error by heart. Now logic tells me that because he now works in the part between the internal router and the vpn gateway is ok. My guess is it's because of the cisco access list. I had my own list of access, but for some reason, I decided to use firewall SDM Wizard configuration and it generated this access list.

  Expand the IP 100 access list

  10 permit tcp any host 90.90.150.82 eq 4500

  20 permit tcp any host 90.90.150.82 eq 500

  30 permit tcp any host 90.90.150.82 eq 51

  40 permit tcp any host 90.90.150.82 eq 50

  50 permit tcp any host 90.90.150.82 eq 3101

  60 permit tcp any host 90.90.150.82 eq 993

  70 permit tcp any host 90.90.150.82 eq 587

  80 permit tcp any host 90.90.150.82 eq smtp (722 matches)

  90 deny ip 192.168.0.8 0.0.0.7 (20606 matches)

  100 permit icmp any host 90.90.150.82 - response to echo (113 matches)

  110 permit icmp any host 90.90.150.82 time exceeded (54 matches)

  120 permit icmp any inaccessible 90.90.150.82 host (1051 matches)

  130 deny ip 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 (726 matches)

  140 deny ip 172.16.0.0 0.15.255.255 all

  150 deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 everything

  160 deny ip 127.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 everything

  170 deny ip 255.255.255.255 host everything

  180 deny host ip 0.0.0.0 everything

  190 deny ip any any newspaper (5163 matches) Extended 100 IP access list

  Given that the natting to the smtp protocol works, I think that the natting is ok. I ping the server vpn, so routing also seems to be ok. Vpn users receive a vpn ip address pool 192.168.x.x. is it possible that the 150 rule that prevents them to connect? I can't test, because it's a living environment and I'll have to plan a window. Im just trying to figure out what is wrong, so I can fix it for a window. Someone at - it ideas?

  No, you don't need AH if your VPN policy does not include AH.

• Access remote VPN question - hairpin

  Hello, I did a search before posting this question but I have not found anything specific to my situation.

  We have our ASA5520 configured in our main office to allow remote access Cisco VPN client users to access our network.  We have a (network 192.168.1.0/24) remote desktop we have a configured on the same ASA5520 VPN IPSec tunnel that allows the use of internal users (in the main office) to access resources on the network remote (192.168.1.0) and vice versa.  The problem is that when users connect to the remote VPN access, they are not able to access the resources of the remote office network.  We created the nat0 ACL and labour, and split tunnel routing is implemented for users VPN remote network access (if I make a copy of the route on my laptop after connecting to the VPN, I see the road to 192.168.0.0/24 in my routing table).  Routing everything is in place to do this, since the IPSec VPN tunnel is up and working.  My suspicion is that the question has something to do with the consolidation of these VPN clients.

  What else needs to be configured to work?  Thank you.

  Hi Scott,.

  I have a client with a PIX 515E which allows connections to remote VPN and VPN LAN2LAN multiple connections.

  We had this problem too... so what I made in my pix was:

  TEST (config) # same-security-traffic intra-interface permits (its off by default)

  If you use ASDM go to:

  Configuration > Interfaces >

  at the bottom of this page, there is an option that says: 'enable traffic between two or more host computers connected to the same interface '.

  Check and it should work... I hope

  I await your comments...

  Kind regards.

  Joao Tendeiro

• Cannot access remote VPN site-to-site VPN

  Internal network: 192.168.0.0/16

  The remote VPN Clients: 192.168.0.100 - 192.168.0.254

  Remote (L2L) network: 10.10.10.0/26

  Remote VPN Clients are able to access the internal network without problem, but are unable to access the remote 10.10.10.0. Is it possible to debug this? "packet - trace" show no problem...

  Hi Ben,

  Please create a no. - nat on the external interface, because your customers to vpn-remote and remote-L2L tunnels are located on outside interface (i.e. from the outside).  You should treat your outside network identical to your inside network, as you would create a no. - nat for your inside networks.

  The ACL you create for the no - nat outside must be in both directions as below.

  permit access ip 192.168.0.0 scope list outside_nat0 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.192

  outside_nat0 to access extended list ip 10.10.10.0 allow 255.255.255.192 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0

  NAT (outside) 0-list of access outside_nat0

  permit same-security-traffic intra-interface

  Pls let me know, if this is useful.

  Thank you

  Rizwan James

• Access remotely - VPN - ASA - port restriction

  Hello

  Is there a way to limit the vpn connection to an ip address and a port? I can do an IP only, but we may restrict with a single port? I mean that the user must connect only to a port?

  Thank you

  Hello

  You should be able to restrict the access of a user to a specific destination IP and port using a vpn-filter.  Here is a link that can help you understand and configure a vpn-filter on your ASA.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00808c9a87.shtml

  As you can see from the information provided in the link you can apply the vpn filter for the group however, policy making all users who connect to this group policy will inherit the vpn-filter and is limited to what you have defined in the ACL on the filter.  In your case, it would be better to simply apply your vpn-filter ACL specific user as part of their attributes.  When this particular user connects their access will be limited to what you have configured in the vpn-filter while other users will continue to have unlimited access.

  I hope this info helps!

  -Jason Espino