ADF security: do not be securityContext.authenticated in the bindings of the ADF

I am developing ADF 11 g Secure Application.
first of all, I created the web application from merger. Run the ADF security wizard.and
enable the security of ADF for my created application.and of users roles and application roles and principals.and gives access to the Web page.

Then, I try to create a Custom Login Page.i am in following the
29 allowing ADF security in a Web Application from merger ' chapter in the fusion Developer's guide.

here at 29.7 creating a Login Page,

for the text property of the binding component go, they said to put:
#{securityContext.authenticated? & quot;} Click here to close the session & quot; :
& quot; Click here to open a session & quot ;}
and the property of Destination:

#{securityContext.authenticated? & quot; / adfAuthentication? logout = true & amp;}
end_url = / faces/welcome. JSPX & quot; :
& quot;/adfAuthentication?success_url=/faces/welcome.jspx & quot ;}


But in the generator expressions for the text properties and the destination, I'm getting the class.under of SecurityContext I have that a single "userName".i I do not get the property "authenticated".


so, how is it possible for me to create the connection link on the public page.


If anyone face the same problem and get resolved it please guide me.

Sanchez

Hello

you are not on the latest version of JDeveloper 11 g but the production fisrt version I guess. Here the EL constructor only shows the username. In the buld of current production, all other options in EL are displayed as well. However, typing the hand EL should work during execution

Frank

Tags: Java

Similar Questions

  • Keyboard does not work after authentication on the RDS Session host

    When you connect to the RDS through the access portal or app keyboard does not work after authentication on the RDS session host. Offline authentication works very well, past will guide you to the RDS host, then when you try to reset your password, the keyboard does not work.

    Has anyone else had that... ?

    Options (some better than others!) are:

    1. move all MS applications seamless

    2. have an application named "Reset your password" (or similar) which uses MS Seamless.then you can leave other applications, as they are

    3 disable authentication carried forward and implemented our service reset password instead so people reset their password before can connect you.

    4. use the full desktop instead of transparent

  • List security fixes not released by microsoft over the years 2007 to 2009

    Hi all

    Currently, I am looking for the list of security patches not released by microsoft over the years 2007 to 2009.

    I am aware that most of these islands are very old and new version (superseeded) patches have been released by microsoft.

    But I have a very specific requirement of our client companies to make the list of those available patches.

    Please help me to get the list of patches for the mentioned period. (no link or KB containing the corresponding list will do)

    Thanks adavance :)

    DNR

    Please see the message in your thread on Technet.  You can also try Googling the information as we do.

    https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/0f25d5bd-6e64-4B34-a2d3-a42f55f594fa/list-of-non-security-patches-released-by-Microsoft-during-years-2007-to-2009?Forum=winserverManagement

  • Clear HOWTO #{securityContext.authenticated} when the user opens a new tab in the browser

    Hello world

    I use a template for my ADF Application, so I make the application menu depending on whether the user is authenticated or not, if the menu is not displayed in the login page and use a common template for all my pages:

    rendered = "#{SecurityContext.Authenticated} '"

    My problem is that the value remains, so I would like to know what is best practice to turn it off when the user opens a new tab, or maybe my approach is quite wrong?

    Thanks experts!

    Jose.

    Hello

    I changed the method, so I give the menu according to a 'login' property in a managed bean:

    With the corresponding accessor:

    public boolean isLoginPage() {}

    Var currentPage = FacesContext.getCurrentInstance () .getViewRoot () .getViewId ();

    If (currentPage.contains ("login")) {}

    return (true);

    } else {}

    Return (false) End Function

    }

    }

    Thanks for your help!

    Jose.

  • Is there a plan for Firefox support FIDO U2F security keys for 2-factor authentication, as the Chrome browser does now?

    I'm a Firefox user for a long time. Today I just read on FIDO U2f security keys, a USB dongle that supports 2-factor authentication. It is supported by Chrome, but apparently no other browser. Looks promising, and I wonder if there is any project to provide Firefox support for these keys.

    Hello larrydparkerus, if you are interested in this feature, you can subscribe to bug #1065729 to get updates one times things are progressing...

  • Windows XP security does not allow me access to the browser or the internet

    I'm having a problem with XP Security that keeps popping up almost continuously and prevents me from doing anything , without ordering the software.   It also shows that I have 26 virus, but an another separate scanning with a newly installed anti-virus [Ioio] program stated that 5 and were all deleted/purged.

    I have been using FireFox as my browser and still cannot access Yahoo homepage - impossible to go to the post office or anything else.  Pop up warnings keep coming and display 'Windows XP Security' is still waiting for me to buy their program - and I can not change anything on this menu at all since it keeps redirecting me to the purchase.  I can't get FireFox or even Internet Explorer since it shows a terrible message and does not allow me to circumvent it.

    What can I do to get rid of this problem?  I had to use using another computer to communicate with you and don't know what to do to solve this problem.  This same message/problem seems to resurface every year and made it for 2-3 years.  I resorted to an online, remote help to alleviate the problem in the past, and it still costs a lot of money to solve.  How can I FIX?

    See if that helps.

    http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/virus-removal/remove-total-security

  • securityContext.authenticated not found in the workspace

    Hi all

    We are migrating application Forms Oracle JDeveloper 11 g.

    We follow a modular approach to building application. Overall, demand has a number of workspaces application.

    A workspace user interface is developed in order to provide common characteristics of appearance, including page templates, skins, etc.

    Currently we working on the workspace of the interface user and development model. We want to show different messages based on the connection. If the user is logged a message like 'You are logged in as ABC' and then 'not connected' not displayed.

    We use the af:switch component, where name of facet is returned by a ternary expression * #{securityContext.authenticated?'} {LoggedIn': 'loggedout'} *. The expression builder is not recognize securityContext.

    I need to enable security in any workspace before using securityContext or some special needs?

    All suspicion or guidance will be highly appreciated.

    Best regards
    Bilal

    Hello

    not sure which release of JDeveloper, you're on. I tried 11.1.1.5 and here the EL shows for all projects that are configured to use the ADF Faces. The entry "securityContext" is under the 'ADF Bindings' node in EL Editor

    Frank

  • Login, authentication of the ADF page rendering problem

    Hi all

    I use Jdev12c and authentication of the ADF configuration in my application. MY login pages are not html and JSF pages. After you set up the security of the skin on the login page stops working. The drawn solution of article https://blogs.oracle.com/jdevotnharvest/entry/solving_jdeveloper_11gr2_issue_with does not help (which seems to be incomplete).

    Now, reading autour, I made an assumption are the result of changes and it seems to work. But I don't know if it can cause any problem of security in the merger application. Any idea/thoughts?

    < security constraint >

    < web-resource-collection >

    allPages < web-resource-name > < / web-resource-name >

    < url-pattern > /visages / * < / url scheme >

    (it was < url-pattern > / * < / url-pattern >)

    < / web-resource-collection >

    <>auth-constraint

    valid users - < role name > < / role name >

    < / auth-constraint >

    < / security constraint >

    (There is also a page-def on the login page and the model used for the login page).

    Thank you!!

    Mrig

    Very well. Figured out.

    According to what little I learned about the web.xml file, I had to follow processes & groping to find resources which create problem. So Pagedef and models are not the problem which might have been in previous versions of Jdev. I added ' / resources/images / * ' under web-resource-collection.

    Authorized resources ADF

    information/images / *.

    allPages

    faces *.

    (it was / *)

    valid users

    I thought the CSS files and templates like that I used on the login page.

    Thanks for the help and suggestions!

  • ACS Auth: Use of group data for the authentication of the user-&gt; security problem?

    IM only using a VPN-installation (router, ACS, Cisco VPN Client) and I noticed that the name of the Group and the Group decrypted password can also be used in the second step of the authentication (the extent of authentication or authentication of users), which is a big security concern. What wrong with my setup.

    For the test I have set up a VPN configuration as described in cisco documents. Here, it also works. The identification information of the Working Group in the authentication of the user, too, which is quite logical, because the group credentials are also a user in the database of GBA. Of course, this user can be authenticated in the user authentication process.

    Who is wrong? How other admins to solve this problem? Am I wrong in my approach?

    Thank you!

    Yes, permission will have password for "cisco", at least for isakmp and pki. The group will send its name and password Cisco to receive the av pairs (ASA has a function to create a "good word of different past" but he's not here on IOS, AFAIR)

    It is a restriction known - you should not use the same server for authentication and authorization, with IOS and ASA.

    Did you give this property (either / or):

    -local isakmp authorization

    -l' authentication certificate (Group)

    -sharing features for authentication and authorization between servers.

    I don't think we can do much wise configuration to prohibit this behavior.

    Edit: spelling correction.

  • Cisco Secure ACS 4.2 Windows authentication of different domain

    Hello

    I have a Cisco Secure ACS for Windows Server 4.2. The server belongs to a domain and the domain, the users belonging to a certain group are authenticated.

    Now, I have to change the configuration of the server and reassign it to another area. There is no trust relationship between two domains and I would like to know if users can always be authenticated against the previous domain.

    Hello

    First of all, take backup (by measure of precaution in order to restore config if something goes wrong) then continue witht the following:

    -Remove the configuration of the windows domain (group... mapping etc) from the server before changing the field.

    -Change the domain membership, and then restart.

    -follow the missions post-disiez for ACS (see this link): http://tiny.cc/zr6huw.

    -Configure the external database again on GBA (group mapping, strategy unknown user... etc).

    You should note that if the new domain controller is Windows Server 2008 R2, which is not supported by ACS 4.x.

    HTH

    Amjad

    Rating of useful answers is more useful to say "thank you".

  • OSB 10 gR 3 - flag of process WS-Security does not not with PasswordDigest

    Hello

    Oracle documentation when you set the "process ws-security header" in the Security section of the proxy service, the proxy service act as an active intermediary and consume ws-security, received in the incoming message header. This feature works fine when you call the proxy service using WS - Security Username Token profile PasswordText, but when you send the username with PasswordDigest token I got the following error: + "" weblogic.xml.crypto.wss.WSSecurityException: could not validate the assertions of identity "+"
    I use SoapUi to call the proxy with passwordDigest, option Type WSS - password set to PasswordDigest.

    Proxy configured with:
    General tab-> proxy WSDL-based service, the wsdl was not definitions of ws-policy inside.
    Transport tab-> Get all the headers = Yes
    HTTP Transport-> required = No HTTPS tab / authentication = Basic
    Operation tab-> apply WS - I compliance not active = / = Type of SOAP body selection algorithm
    Content tab message-> default settings
    Political-> Auth.xml (predefined) added political policies of the application.
    Security tab-> process WS-Security header = Yes / custom authentication settings = none

    -> Error
    + < 12/01/2009 BRST 09h34min55s > < error > < OSB security > < BEA-387022 > < an error occurred during the processing of incoming request of web service security [error code: fault, message-id: 6198860737666014185 - de42214.12549f82d66.-7fdb, proxy: AlphaTests, MyProxy, Proxy, MyLogProxy, operation: null] +.
    -Error message:
    + < env:Envelope xmlns:env = 'http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/' > < env:Header / > < env:Body > < env:Fault xmlns:wsse = "http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd" > < wsse:InvalidSecurity faultcode > < / faultcode > * < faultstring > impossible to validate the assertions of identity. < / faultstring > * < / env:Fault > < / env:Body > < / env:Envelope > +.
    weblogic.xml.crypto.wss.WSSecurityException: could not validate the assertions of identity.
    + weblogic.wsee.security.wss.SecurityPolicyValidator.processIdentity(SecurityPolicyValidator.java:133) +.
    + weblogic.wsee.security.wss.SecurityPolicyValidator.processInbound(SecurityPolicyValidator.java:77) +.
    + weblogic.wsee.security.WssServerPolicyHandler.processInbound(WssServerPolicyHandler.java:54) +.
    + weblogic.wsee.security.WssServerPolicyHandler.processRequest(WssServerPolicyHandler.java:30) +.
    + weblogic.wsee.security.WssHandler.handleRequest(WssHandler.java:74) +.
    + com.bea.wli.sb.security.wss.WssInboundHandler.processRequest(WssInboundHandler.java:155) +.
    + com.bea.wli.sb.security.wss.WssHandlerImpl.doInboundRequest(WssHandlerImpl.java:201) +.
    + com.bea.wli.sb.context.BindingLayerImpl.addRequest(BindingLayerImpl.java:257) +.
    + com.bea.wli.sb.pipeline.MessageProcessor.processRequest(MessageProcessor.java:66) +.
    + com.bea.wli.sb.pipeline.RouterManager$ 1.run(RouterManager.java:508) +.
    + com.bea.wli.sb.pipeline.RouterManager$ 1.run(RouterManager.java:506) +.
    + weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:363) +.
    + weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs (Unknown Source) +.
    + com.bea.wli.sb.security.WLSSecurityContextService.runAs(WLSSecurityContextService.java:55) +.
    + com.bea.wli.sb.pipeline.RouterManager.processMessage(RouterManager.java:505) +.
    + com.bea.wli.sb.transports.TransportManagerImpl.receiveMessage(TransportManagerImpl.java:371) +.
    + com.bea.wli.sb.transports.http.HttpTransportServlet$ RequestHelper$ 1.run(HttpTransportServlet.java:279) +.
    + com.bea.wli.sb.transports.http.HttpTransportServlet$ RequestHelper$ 1.run(HttpTransportServlet.java:277) +.
    + weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:363) +.
    + weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs (Unknown Source) +.
    + com.bea.wli.sb.transports.http.HttpTransportServlet$ (HttpTransportServlet.java:276) RequestHelper.securedInvoke +.
    + com.bea.wli.sb.transports.http.HttpTransportServlet$ (HttpTransportServlet.java:237) RequestHelper.service +.
    + com.bea.wli.sb.transports.http.HttpTransportServlet.service(HttpTransportServlet.java:133) +.
    + weblogic.servlet.FutureResponseServlet.service(FutureResponseServlet.java:24) +.
    + javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820) +.
    + weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper$ (StubSecurityHelper.java:227) ServletServiceAction.run +.
    + weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper.invokeServlet(StubSecurityHelper.java:125) +.
    + weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:292) +.
    + weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:175) +.
    + weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ (WebAppServletContext.java:3498) ServletInvocationAction.run +.
    + weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321) +.
    + weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs (Unknown Source) +.
    + weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.securedExecute(WebAppServletContext.java:2180) +.
    + weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.execute(WebAppServletContext.java:2086) +.
    + weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.run(ServletRequestImpl.java:1406) +.
    + weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:201) +.
    + weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:173) +.

    Yes, 'Process WS - Security Token' works with PasswordDigest. This should not be a bug, there is probably something missing in the configuration of WLS.

    You have activated password digestate in asserting the identity provider?
    Have reset you passwords for users who were created before password digestate have been activated?
    You have activated password digestate in the web service security mbeans?

  • I see not that everything written on the firefox page. But when open secure mod (with SHIFT because there is no written) firefox run normally.

    I see not that everything written on the firefox page. But when open secure mod (with SHIFT because there is no written) firefox run normally.

    If you have tried safe mode and the problem disappeared, this means that one of your modules are the origin of the problem are seen.

  • Satellite C50 - secure boot not configured correctly build 9600

    Hello

    Recently bought a refurbished nine Toshiba Satellite C50 8.1 of windows operating system. Was very happy with it but found the message 'not properly configured SecureBoot 9600 building "watermark in the lower right corner of my office. '.

    Decided to search the Internet for a resolution and after being gone on 3 Troubleshooting sites, discovered on the necessary BIOS configuration, but he warned that it was for experienced users who know their stuff on the technical aspects of computers. While I am computer literate, I'm not someone who likes to mess with the advanced options. Then, I came across a reliable computer blog that had a detailed post on SecureBoot.

    (Link to the blog post and specfic):
    www.techrepublic.com/blog/Windows-and-Office/deal-with-the-secureboot-isn't-configured-correctly-watermark-in-windows-81/)

    I thought that that would solve my problem, and I have to admit that he helped, telling me to use windows powershell as a precaution before using the BIOS Setup. I was glad I did as it came in saying that I have a policy of SecureBoot of the present failure on my laptop which case I have to request technical support for a specific system solution that would generally be an update of the firmware.

    I tried to call, but the line was busy and estimated it might be easier to post this question on a forum.

    If anyone has an answer please help as I would like to really activate SecureBoot if possible, I believe that computers must be set up with the best possible security options and makes me feel comfortable in knowing that it is implemented safely.

    Someone commented on the blog and posted this solution:

    The fix for the registry to remove the watermark is as follows.
    1. start the registry with the Admin (C:\Windows\regedit) rights Editor
    2. navigate to the following location
    -> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE-SOFTWARE-Microsoft-Windows-CurrentVersion------policies------system.
    3. here, the two values "ConsentPromptBehaviorAdmin ' and 'EnableLUA 'the value' 0'.

    You can also try to activate the boot option secure in the BIOS (in which case it is not already selected)
    To enter the BIOS, press F2 during the turn on/off the device.

    Also recommend that you check this page from Microsoft:
    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-8/secure-boot-watermark

  • When I connect to secure Web sites (that is to say the National Bank aust) it says not a trusted site and certificate not valid?

    When I connect to secure Web sites (that is to say the National Bank aust) a message pops up saying not approved Web site and the security certificate is not valid? I can also book flights on qantas and Virgin site? Help, please. I could do all this 24 hours but now can not do something like this.

    Try to upgrade to a newer version of Firefox 3.6.x or 6.0.x.

    Your current version of Firefox 3.0.19 can exceeded SSL certificate expired.

    Also check the date and time of the clock on your computer: (double) click on the clock icon in the Windows taskbar.

  • Hello, I forgot my security questions, I want to change but the need for an aid station. And I do not add a post before rescue. How can I add now? Please help me. TNX.

    Hello, I forgot my security questions, I want to change but the need for an aid station. And I do not add a post before rescue. How can I add now? Please help me. TNX.

    You can not and need to ask Apple to reset your security questions. To do this, click here and choose a method; If this page does not list one for your country or if you are unable to call, complete and submit this form.

    (137646)

Maybe you are looking for