Allow the Ipsec Protocol in ISP
Hi guys,.
I am trying to establish a site-to-site ipsec tunnel. I asked the ISP to allow the Protocol ip between an aet B site.
I would like to know if ISP open it Ip Protocol if it passes all the required protocol ipsec tunnel and for that I need to ask them to open SPECIFIC protocols below
50 - encapsulation header (ESP)
51 - authentication Header (AH)
500/udp - Internet Key Exchange (IKE)
4500/udp - NAT traversal
Thanks in advance
Just to clarify Javier is correct, IPsec is the layer 3 protocol to which ESP and AH belong, not IP.
Sorry to disagree with you and Javier (this time).
ESP is an encapsulation over IP (IP-protocol is 50). So your rug will be what ETH-IP-ESP. TCP (Protocol IP-6) is also at the top of the intellectual property, the battery will be ETH-IP-TCP. The two (and IP GRE/47, AH IP/51, IP ICMP/1...) share the same IP protocol.
If ESP and AH was not based on intellectual property, but something else, they could not be routed through an IP network.
And if you use an ACL with "license ip any any", all of these protocols are included. Plese try it in a laboratory to make sure that.
--
Don't stop once you have upgraded your network! Improve the world by lending money to low-income workers:
http://www.Kiva.org/invitedBy/karsteni
Tags: Cisco Security
Similar Questions
-
Need for visibility on the IPsec protocol: aggressive Mode
Hello
I have a few doubts about VPN. I already went through a large number of documents. Everybody says something I don't agree with. So please don't view this kind of material in your answer.
Aggressive mode: what I know, there are 3 Exchange for aggressive mode. Initiator in the first message sends the ID parameters, DH, HIS (IP address, domain name FULL). Then the answering machine (2nd MSG) reacts with the SA settings, DH, ID, HASH_R, then the initiator (3rd MSG) responds with HASH_I and PHASE 1 is established here.
As the initiator and the responder IDs are sent in clear text, so we say that aggressive mode is not course.
DH is used to exchange keys between peers. DH, negotiates and then generate a SECRET_KEY which in turn, is used to encrypt the symmetric key. We have SA parameters for encryption, hash, authentication.
Here are my questions:
(a) all of ITS parameters, IDs, DH traded first and second messages. The third message from the initiator is to send to HASH_I. Now, I don't see at all any use of DH in this mode, no encryption (payload ISAKAMP is not encrypted). A single phase 1 aims to build a secure layer of management so that the PHASE connection 2 (data connection) may establish under a secure layer (PHASE 1). Now, I see that in aggressive mode we are not able to achieve this secure layer. So, what's the point of having encryption algorithms and DH in PHASE 1 if they are never used? Instead of skip PHASE 1 and we can have the PFS in Phase 2 for serving as a DH and we were hashing algorithms, encryption too.
(b) the PRE SHARED KEY is actually shared via connect using the DH? Or just a HASH of PRE-SHARED-KEY is generated and sent on the connection for authentication?
(c) why the aggressive mode can be used for dynamic addressing and not the main mode?
If please answer queries and correct me if I am wrong somewhere.
Thank you
Rakesh Kumar
(a). theoretically, jumping Phase 1 and done everything in Phase 2 (for aggressive mode only) would probably be a good idea to make it safer. However, this would require a complete redesign of the IKE protocol. As you probably already know, aggressive mode is used by default only for VPN remote access, and I've never seen used for a site to any of the customers that I came in contact. In aggressive mode, in my opinion, would be used only in situations where a large number of VPN tunnels are built and demolished all the time (as with RA VPN) to save on material resources. But... It is what it is, not a very safe to use method.
(b) the pre-shared key is used to create a hash and this hash is sent to the remote peer. If the remote peer can create the same hash using its own pre-shared key, then peers know they share the same secrets. The problem with aggressive mode is that the hash is sent in plain text format, so if an attacker is able to capture these data they could preform a brute force offline attack.
(c). I think that this has to do with the fact that the aggressive mode sends its identity in text clear and not must therefore not be pre-configured as a peer answer as it does with tunnels with addresses static at both ends.
--
Please do not forget to select a correct answer and rate useful posts
-
ACL to restrict the SCP Protocol
Dear Sir
I want to allow the SCP Protocol on my Cisco devices (routers, switches, wap,...) for a single host (a server that backs up the configuration by SCP).
But if I'm not mistaken, the SCP Protocol through the SSH protocol.
So, do you know if it is possible to allow the SCP to a host protocol and allow an SSH connection from any host using an ACL?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Kind regards
Access lists filter network traffic by controlling whether routed packets are forwarded or blocked at the interfaces of the router. Your router examines each packet to determine whether to send or drop off the package, based on the criteria you specified in the access lists. Access lists can allow a host to access a part of your network and prevent another host to access the same area
-
/ * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Table Normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-qformat:yes ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 à 5.4pt 0 à 5.4pt ; mso-para-marge-top : 0 ; mso-para-marge-droit : 0 ; mso-para-marge-bas : 10.0pt ; mso-para-marge-left : 0 ; ligne-hauteur : 115 % ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-fareast-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-fareast-theme-font : minor-fareast ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ;}
Hello guys,.
I have Cisco ASA5520 facing the ISP with private IP address. We don't have a router and how to get the IPSec VPN through the internet?
The question statement not the interface pointing to ISP isn't IP address private and inside as well.
Firewall configuration:
Firewall outside interface Gi0 10.0.1.2 > ISP 10.0.1.1 with security-level 0
Firewall inside the interface Ethernet0 192.168.1.1 > LAN switch 192.168.1.2 with security-level 100
I have public IP block 199.9.9.1/28
How can I use the public IP address to create the IPSec VPN tunnel between two sites across the internet?
can I assign a public IP address on the Gig1 inside the interface with the security level of 100 and how to apply inside to carry on this interface?
If I configure > firewall inside of the item in gi1 interface ip address 199.9.9.1/28 with security-level 100. How to make a safe lane VPN through this interface on the internet?
I'm used to the public IP address allocation to the interface outside of the firewall and private inside the interface IP address.
Please help with configuration examples and advise.
Thank you
Eric
Unfortunately, you can only complete the VPN connection on the interface the VPN connection source, in your case the external interface.
3 options:
(1) connect a router in front of the ASA and assign your public ip address to the ASA outside interface.
OR /.
(2) If your ISP can perform static translation of 1 to 1, then you can always finish the VPN on the external interface and ask your provider what is the static ip address assigned to your ASA out of the IP (10.0.1.2) - this will launch the VPN of bidirectionally
OR /.
(3) If your ISP performs PAT (dynamic NAT), then you can only start the tunnel VPN on the side of the ASA and the other end of the tunnel must be configured to allow VPN LAN-to-LAN dynamics.
-
The address was not included
Firefox doesn't know how to open this address, because one of the following protocols (rtsp) is not associated with any program or is not allowed in this context.
You might need to install other software to open this address.
I'm not a Curmudgeon, so please keep it simple.
Thank you
Firefox 32.0.3 has this security update.
You can check the version in "> about". -
I am installing CC on an iMac late 2015. I get the following error message: Firefox doesn't know how to open this address, because one of the following protocols (aam) is not associated with any program or is not allowed in this context. You may need to install additional software to open this address. "Someone knows what's going on?
Please try to download from: https://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/help/install-apps.html. You can also try to download using the different browser.
-
Allowing the VPN Clients to the management network - nat woes
Try to allow the VPNClient IPSEC access to the management network. packet trace stops on the vpn encrypt even through phase 7 States it's NAT EXEMPT, he said his tent still NAT by a static. The only thing I can think to put a rule of nat exempted for the subnet on the external interface.
Please notify. Thank you.
Phase: 1
Type: ACCESS-LIST
Subtype:
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Implicit rule
Additional information:
MAC access listPhase: 2
Type: FLOW-SEARCH
Subtype:
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional information:
Not found no corresponding stream, creating a new streamPhase: 3
Type:-ROUTE SEARCH
Subtype: entry
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional information:
in 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 outdoorsPhase: 4
Type: ACCESS-LIST
Subtype: Journal
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Access-group MANAGEMENT-IN in the management interface
access-list MANAGEMENT-IN-scope ip allowed any one
Additional information:Phase: 5
Type: IP-OPTIONS
Subtype:
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional information:Phase: 6
Type: FOVER
Subtype: Eve-updated
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional information:Phase: 7
Type: NAT-FREE
Subtype:
Result: ALLOW
Config:
match ip MANAGEMENT 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 outside 172.18.0.32 255.255.255.240
Exempt from NAT
translate_hits = 3, untranslate_hits = 33
Additional information:Phase: 8
Type: NAT
Subtype:
Result: ALLOW
Config:
static (MANAGEMENT, outside) 203.23.23.75 10.10.10.10 netmask 255.255.255.255
MANAGEMENT ip 10.10.10.10 host game OUTSIDE of any
static translation at 203.23.176.75
translate_hits = 0, untranslate_hits = 1
Additional information:Phase: 9
Type: NAT
Subtype: host-limits
Result: ALLOW
Config:
static (MANAGEMENT, outside) 203.23.23.75 10.10.10.10 netmask 255.255.255.255
MANAGEMENT ip 10.10.10.10 host game OUTSIDE of any
static translation at 203.23.23.75
translate_hits = 0, untranslate_hits = 1
Additional information:Phase: 10
Type: VPN
Subtype: encrypt
Result: DECLINE
Config:
Additional information:Result:
input interface: MANAGEMENT
entry status: to the top
entry-line-status: to the top
output interface: OUTSIDE
the status of the output: to the top
output-line-status: to the top
Action: drop
Drop-reason: flow (acl-drop) is denied by the configured rule-EXCERPT FROM CONFIG-
CorpVPN to access extended list ip 10.10.10.0 allow 255.255.255.0 172.18.0.32 255.255.255.240
Access extensive list ip 172.18.0.32 CorpVPN allow 255.255.255.240 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0mask 172.18.0.33 - 172.18.0.46 255.255.255.240 IP local pool CorpVPN
access-list MANAGEMENT-extended permitted tcp 172.18.0.32 255.255.255.240 host 10.10.10.11 eq ssh
access-list MANAGEMENT-extended permitted tcp 172.18.0.32 255.255.255.240 host 10.10.10.10 eq ssh
access-list MANAGEMENT-extended permitted tcp 172.18.0.32 255.255.255.240 host 10.10.10.13 eq 3389access-list 101 extended allow ip 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 172.18.0.32 255.255.255.240
NAT 0 access-list (MANAGEMENT) No.-NAT-DU-MGMT
access-list no.-NAT-DU-MGMT scope ip 10.10.10.0 allow 255.255.255.0 172.18.0.32 255.255.255.240CorpVPN to access extended list ip 10.10.10.0 allow 255.255.255.0 172.18.0.32 255.255.255.240
Access extensive list ip 172.18.0.32 CorpVPN allow 255.255.255.240 allinternal CorpVPN group strategy
attributes of Group Policy CorpVPN
value of server DNS 203.23.23.23
VPN - connections 8
VPN-idle-timeout 720
Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec l2tp ipsec
Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
value of Split-tunnel-network-list CorpVPN
the address value CorpVPN poolstype tunnel-group CorpVPN remote access
attributes global-tunnel-group CorpVPN
address pool CorpVPN
Group Policy - by default-CorpVPN
IPSec-attributes tunnel-group CorpVPN
pre-shared keyFirst of all, there is overlap crypto ACL with the VPN static L2L:
crypto ASA1MAP 10 card matches the address 101
access-list 101 extended allow ip 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 172.18.0.32 255.255.255.240
access-list 101 extended allow ip 172.18.0.32 255.255.255.240 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0I would remove the 2 lines of ACL 101 above because it is incorrect.
Secondly, from the output of ' cry ipsec to show his ", you seem to be getting the ip address of the"jdv1.australis.net.au", not"CorpVPN"pool pool. Therefore, the No. NAT ACL on the management interface is incorrect. I would just add a greater variety of education no. NAT so that it covers all your ip pool:
access-list no.-NAT-DU-MGMT scope ip 10.10.10.0 allow 255.255.255.0 172.18.0.0 255.255.255.0
Thirdly, even with your dynamic ACL 'OUTSIDE_cryptomap_65535.65535' crypto map, it only covers the 172.18.0.32/28, so I just want to add a wider range since it seems you get the ip address of the different pool:
OUTSIDE_cryptomap_65535.65535 list of allowed ip extended access all 172.18.0.0 255.255.255.0
Then I would disable the following group of access for purposes of test first:
no access-group MANAGEMENT - OUT Interface MANAGEMENT
Finally, please clear all the SA on your ASA and xlate, then reconnect to your vpn client and test it again:
delete the ipsec cry his
clear the isa cry his
clear xlate
Please let us know how it goes after the changes. If it still doesn't work, please please send again the last configuration and also to send the output of the following:
See the isa scream his
See the ipsec scream his
and a screenshot of the page of statistics on your vpn client. Thank you.
-
Problems connecting to help connect any and the Ipsec VPN Client
I have problems connecting with the VPN client connect no matter what. I can connect with the Ipsec VPN client in Windows 7 32 bit.
Here is my latest config running.
Thank you for taking the time to read this.
passwd encrypted W/KqlBn3sSTvaD0T
no names
name 192.168.1.117 kylewooddesk kyle description
!
interface Vlan1
nameif inside
security-level 100
IP 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Vlan2
nameif outside
security-level 0
IP address dhcp setroute
!
interface Ethernet0/0
switchport access vlan 2
!
interface Ethernet0/1
!
interface Ethernet0/2
!
interface Ethernet0/3
!
interface Ethernet0/4
!
interface Ethernet0/5
!
interface Ethernet0/6
!
interface Ethernet0/7
!
boot system Disk0: / asa822 - k8.bin
passive FTP mode
DNS lookup field inside
DNS domain-lookup outside
DNS server-group DefaultDNS
domain wood.local
permit same-security-traffic intra-interface
object-group service rdp tcp
access rdp Description
EQ port 3389 object
outside_access_in list extended access permit tcp any interface outside eq 3389
outside_access_in list extended access permit tcp any interface outside eq 8080
outside_access_in list extended access permit tcp any interface outside eq 3334
outside_access_in to access extended list ip 192.168.5.0 allow 255.255.255.240 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
woodgroup_splitTunnelAcl list standard access allowed host 192.168.1.117
inside_nat0_outbound to access ip 192.168.1.0 scope list allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.240
outside_access_in_1 list extended access permit tcp any host 192.168.1.117 eq 3389
woodgroup_splitTunnelAcl_1 list standard access allowed 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
inside_nat0_outbound_1 to access ip 192.168.1.0 scope list allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.240
inside_nat0_outbound_1 to access extended list ip 192.168.5.0 allow 255.255.255.240 all
inside_test list extended access permit icmp any host 192.168.1.117
no pager
Enable logging
timestamp of the record
asdm of logging of information
Debugging trace record
Within 1500 MTU
Outside 1500 MTU
mask pool local Kyle 192.168.5.1 - 192.168.5.10 IP 255.255.255.0
IP local pool vpnpool 192.168.1.220 - 192.168.1.230
ICMP unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
ASDM image disk0: / asdm - 631.bin
don't allow no asdm history
ARP timeout 14400
Global (inside) 1 interface
Global 1 interface (outside)
NAT (inside) 0-list of access inside_nat0_outbound_1
NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
public static interface 3389 (indoor, outdoor) 192.168.1.117 tcp 3389 netmask 255.255.255.255 dns
public static tcp (indoor, outdoor) interface 8080 192.168.1.117 8080 netmask 255.255.255.255
public static tcp (indoor, outdoor) interface 3334 192.168.1.86 3334 netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside, upside down) 75.65.238.40 192.168.1.117 netmask 255.255.255.255
Access-group outside_access_in in interface outside
Timeout xlate 03:00
Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
Sunrpc timeout 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 mgcp from 01:00 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
Sip timeout 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 prompt Protocol sip-0: 03:00 sip - disconnect 0:02:00
Timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute
timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00
dynamic-access-policy-registration DfltAccessPolicy
WebVPN
the files enable exploration
activate the entry in the file
enable http proxy
Enable URL-entry
SVC request no svc default
AAA authentication http LOCAL console
Enable http server
http 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 inside
No snmp server location
No snmp Server contact
Server enable SNMP traps snmp authentication linkup, linkdown cold start
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-MD5 esp-aes-256 esp-md5-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-SHA esp - esp-sha-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-MD5 esp - esp-md5-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-192-MD5 esp-aes-192 esp-md5-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5-esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA 256 - aes - esp esp-sha-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA aes - esp esp-sha-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-192-SHA esp-aes-192 esp-sha-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-MD5-esp - aes esp-md5-hmac
life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800
Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life - safety 4608000 association
crypto dynamic-map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 pfs Group1 set
Crypto dynamic-map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 value transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA ESP-AES-128-MD5 ESP-AES-192-SHA ESP-AES-192-MD5 ESP-AES-256-SHA ESP-AES-256-MD5 ESP-3DES-SHA MD5-ESP-3DES ESP-DES-SHA ESP-DES-MD5
outside_map card crypto 65535-isakmp dynamic ipsec SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP
outside_map interface card crypto outside
crypto isakmp identity address
crypto ISAKMP allow outside
crypto ISAKMP policy 10
preshared authentication
3des encryption
sha hash
Group 2
life 86400
Telnet 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 inside
Telnet timeout 5
SSH timeout 5
Console timeout 0
dhcpd dns 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4
dhcpd lease 3000
!
dhcpd address 192.168.1.100 - 192.168.1.130 inside
dhcpd allow inside
!
a basic threat threat detection
host of statistical threat detection
Statistics-list of access threat detection
no statistical threat detection tcp-interception
WebVPN
allow outside
SVC disk0:/anyconnect-win-2.4.1012-k9.pkg 1 image
enable SVC
internal sslwood group policy
attributes of the strategy of group sslwood
VPN-tunnel-Protocol svc webvpn
WebVPN
list of URLS no
internal group woodgroup strategy
woodgroup group policy attributes
value of server DNS 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4
Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec
Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
value of Split-tunnel-network-list woodgroup_splitTunnelAcl_1
mrkylewood encrypted Q4339wmn1ourxj9X privilege 15 password username
username mrkylewood attributes
VPN-group-policy sslwood
VPN - connections 3
VPN-tunnel-Protocol svc webvpn
value of group-lock sslwood
WebVPN
SVC request no webvpn default
tunnel-group woodgroup type remote access
tunnel-group woodgroup General attributes
address pool Kyle
Group Policy - by default-woodgroup
tunnel-group woodgroup ipsec-attributes
pre-shared key *.
type tunnel-group sslwood remote access
tunnel-group sslwood General-attributes
address pool Kyle
authentication-server-group (inside) LOCAL
authentication-server-group (outside LOCAL)
Group Policy - by default-sslwood
!
class-map inspection_default
match default-inspection-traffic
!
!
type of policy-card inspect dns preset_dns_map
parameters
message-length maximum 512
Policy-map global_policy
class inspection_default
inspect the preset_dns_map dns
inspect the ftp
inspect h323 h225
inspect the h323 ras
inspect the netbios
inspect the rsh
inspect the rtsp
inspect the skinny
inspect esmtp
inspect sqlnet
inspect sunrpc
inspect the tftp
inspect the sip
inspect xdmcp
Review the ip options
type of policy-card inspect dns MY_DNS_INSPECT_MAP
parameters
!
global service-policy global_policy
context of prompt hostname
call-home
Profile of CiscoTAC-1
no active account
http https://tools.cisco.com/its/service/oddce/services/DDCEService destination address
email address of destination [email protected] / * /
http https://tools.cisco.com/its/service/...es/DDCEService destination address
destination-mode http transport
Subscribe to alert-group diagnosis
Subscribe to alert-group environment
Subscribe to alert-group monthly periodic inventory
monthly periodicals to subscribe to alert-group configuration
daily periodic subscribe to alert-group telemetry
Cryptochecksum:6fa8db79bcf695080cbdc1159b409360
: end
asawood (config) #.
You also need to add the following:
WebVPN
tunnel-group-list activate
output
tunnel-group sslwood webvpn-attributes
activation of the Group sslwood alias
Let us know if it works.
-
How to prevent the FF loading all Web sites using the HTTPS protocol
FF is trying to load initially all Web sites using the HTTPS protocol, including of mozilla.org. Then I get the error of no reliable connection of course. Mozilla .org is the "invalid security certificate" and "the issuer of the certificate is unknown." I tried to delete the file cert8.db as suggested elsewhere but that did not help. If there is an option for this somewhere, I can't find it. I have the latest version of FF and Win7 running. Thanks for the help.
There must be some sites that are still using a secure connection, as http://www.amazon.com/. If even a link to Amazon is redirected, you can check if you have an extension like HTTPS Everywhere.
For Mozilla sites, Yes, you establish a secure connection.
But you shouldn't get certificate errors! When you get this for virtually all secure sites, the problem is usually as follows:
(1) error of date, time, or time zone who throw checks validity of the certificates of your system. Sometimes allowing to use a timesource on the internet, the computers can introduce this problem.
(2) not be set up to work with your security software that intercepts and filter secure connections from Firefox. Products with this feature include Avast, BitDefender, ESET, Kaspersky; AVG has a shield search function which can cause this error on search sites.
(3) malicious software on your system for the interception of secure connections.
So... who is?
If you have any of these specific security products, which would be the first thing to check. We might be able to help with specific next steps based on what you have if you tell us.
Alternatively, you can examine the certificate to which Firefox is opposed to see if the issuer information pointing to the culprit. Take for example my test page:
https://jeffersonscher.com/RES/jstest.php
You should see a section "I understand the risks" in the page. If you expand this section, you will find a button Add Exception. You don't need to complete the process of adding an exception (I suggest not adding one until we know that it is not a problem of malware), but you can use the dialog box to display the information that makes Firefox suspicious.
Click Add an Exception, and then view. If the view is not enabled, try first the button get certificate. Then in the certificate Viewer, refer to the section "issued by". What do you find here, or under the hierarchy of certificates? I have attached a screenshot for comparison of screen.
-
How to find the security protocol used by a site in firefox to version 24.6.0
I'm unable to find the security protocol used by the site, either SSL or TLS 1.0 or 1.2.
I see my answer above is marked as useless, so I guess it doesn't help for Firefox 24.
You should be able to see which version of the TLS Protocol and encryption to agree to the current use of press.
You can use the above posted extension or check in the Security tab of the Web Console (Firefox/tools > Web Developer).
24 Firefox supports only TLS 1.0 (security.tls.version.max = 1), so that only leaves you with Protocol to guess.- http://KB.mozillazine.org/security.TLS.version. *
- 0 means SSL 3.0, TLS 1.0 means 1, 2 means TLS 1.1, 3 means TLS 1.2 etc..
In Firefox 24 you have the Security tab in "tools > Page Info > Security" to see what level of encryption is used, and you do not see what costume of encryption is used.
To find you would have to disable any combination of encryption algorithm by setting the Pref security.ssls false and allow both until you get a secure connection. -
Canon printer does not connect via the IPP Protocol
I work in a company that sells printers offices/schools/etc. Yesterday, we received a call from a customer indicating that the Copier, we sold them connected not to a new computer they bought.
I went to the site and noticed that the computers in question were all purchased during 3 months and all loaded with Mac OS X El Capitan. Most was registered on 10.11.3, and some 10.11.2 and 10.11.1. All computers work turned Yosemite.
We receive a message somewhere in the sense of "Communication error. This printer may not be able to [print], you want to save it anyway? »
It was a cannon imageRUNNER Advanced C5235. The client declares that if he saved the printer, it would not be able to print, but would still see jams paper, messages and other statutes of the computer printer toner. After attempting to remove and reinstall the printer using the most recent driver available on the Canon Website, we received the same error, the customer received. We escalated it to Canon support, who asked us to choose LPD instead of the PPI for the Protocol, allowing the printer to you connect and start printing on all devices running El Capitan.
After further research, to my knowledge, the ISB is more recent and has more features that the LPD, although I couldn't find much on it so I was uncertain about the origins of these two protocols, except that they were introduced in the 1990s. I know it's kind of vague, but is better/more recent than PPI LPD? If so, great. Otherwise, is there a way to solve this problem and get computers that run El Capitan to connect correctly using IPP?
The problem here is that the driver Canon UFR2 or PS that was used on the Mac to print in ADVANCE of Canon C52xx does not support PPI. This is why you must use an alternative Protocol.
Note that it is possible to print to the C5255 using the PPI, but you need to use the Canon PPDs which means the copier must have the kit installed Postscript printer and you get not the pretty picture base views the pilot UFR2 and PS to give you.
Second point is that the Canon UFR2 and PS drivers, it is preferable to use HP Jetdirect-Socket to the LPD protocol. He sent larger packets and verifies the status of the target unit - LPD simply sends data to the fixed IP address so if the printer has a problem you don't get this information until you walk up to the photocopier.
I hope this helps. Answer if you need more information.
-
Insufficient information provided in the error message generated by the error of MSN O.E. advises: Message could not be sent because the server rejected the sender's e-mail address.
ISP is Sympatico.
Response of the SMTP Protocol: 5305.7.0 must issue a STARTTLS command first.
Q: what is the Protocol, and to «Who» the STARTTLS command is sent?
Your server wants to TLS encryption and you have not enabled in the properties of the account.
The client sends the STARTTLS command to the server. See this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Layer_Security
Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]
--------------------------------
https://MVP.support.Microsoft.com/profile/Brian.Tillman
If a response may help, please vote it as useful. If a response to the problem, please mark it as an answer. -
"The network adapter is not correctly configured to use the ip Protocol" problem on Vista
Hello. My PC has recently came across this problem "the network adapter is not correctly configured to use the ip Protocol", every time I click on diagnose & repair. I don't know how to fix it. Please help, thanks in advance. Magic
Hello X-x_MaGiC_x-X,
Thank you for visiting the website of Microsoft Windows Vista Community.
Try the rest of the stage in this article:
System restore points are created automatically when the following occur:
- When you install a new application or driver.
- When you uninstall or install some programs.
- When you install new updates
- Automatically on a daily interval
- Manually by creating a.
- If you choose to use system restore to restore to a previous restore point, System Restore creates a new restore point before you restore a previous state in case something goes wrong. If you are restoring to a previous state in Mode without failure, a restore point will create for the current state.
So that the restoration of the system to work, you must have 300 MB of free space for each hard disk that monitors the system restore. System Restore will also use up to 15% of disk space on each disk that it monitors. That hard disk space runs out, older restore points will be deleted as newer ones. It is also important to note that you must be logged in as an administrator in order to use the system restore. Now that you understand the basics of the system restore, you must continue to the next section to learn how to use it.
Restore Windows Vista to a previous state
In the case of a problem on your computer that cannot be solved by normal means, you can restore your computer to a previous working state. To do this, you need to start restoring the system so that you can choose the restore point to restore. If you currently have Windows Vista boot problems, you can use the system restore in Windows recovery environment. Instructions on how to do it in this tutorial can be found: System Restore using the Windows Vista recovery environment.
If you can connect to Windows Vista, you must follow these steps.
- Close and save any documents that you have opened.
- Click the Start button to open your Start Menu. The Start button looks like this:
- When the Start Menu open click on the menu option all programs.
- Click once on the Start Menu Accessories group.
- Click once on the System Tools Start Menu group.
- Click once on the icon of the system restore. After you click the icon, if a user account control window opens, click on the button continue.
You will now be on the screen as shown below in Figure 1 system restore. From this screen, you can specify the restore point that you want to restore.
1 screen of system restore
By default, Vista will be already selected the restore recommended option. This restore point is one followed a new pilot program, or update has been installed. If you do not want to use this restore point, you can click on the button next to start the restore process. On the other hand, if there is a more recent restore point that you want to restore you should select choose a different restore point and press the next button. This will bring you to a screen, as shown in Figure 2, which contains a list of all available restore points that you can restore.
2. the list of available restore points
You must select the restore point that you want to restore, and then press the button next to start the restore process. Vista will display a window showing your selected restore point and asking you to confirm that it is that you want to restore.
3. confirm the selected restore point
If you want to select a different restore point, press the Back button. Otherwise, you can press the Cancel button to exit the system restore or the button finish to begin the restore process. If you have selected finish, Vista will display a second prompt asking you to confirm that you want to continue restoring.
4. second Confirmation
If you are sure you want to restore, then press the Yes button. Vista will now log you off the computer and start the system restore process, as shown in Figure 5 below.
5. restoration of a restore point
When the restore is complete, your computer will be restarted and when Vista starts it backup will be restored to its previous state. When you open a Vista session for the first time after the restore, you will see a message indicating that the restore was successful.
6. system restore was successful
If there are problems with your computer because the last restoration, you can return to your previous settings to ebb in the system restore utility and select Undo system restore by pressing the next button.
7 undo the last system restore
Your computer should now work correctly again.
With the help of the restoration of the system in the Windows recovery environment
Manual creation of Restore Points
As mentioned previously, it is also possible to create manual restore depending on points. Some popular designs to create manual restore points are when you have your computer configured perfectly and I would save the State in case of problems in the future. To create a manual restore point, you must follow these steps:
- Click the Start button to open your Start Menu. The Start button looks like this:
- Click on the control panel menu option.
- Click the option menu system and Maintenance.
- Click on the system menu option.
- Click on the System Protection in the list on the left.
You will now be at the System Protection tab in the system control panel. This tab allows you to enable and disable the system restore as well as making the new manual restore points.
8. the System Protection tab
To create a manual restore point, you must click on the button create. When you press this button a prompt asking you to give a title to this manual restore point.
9. Enter the manual restore point title
Type a title for the manual restore point and press the button create. Vista will now create a restore point manually and once finished, post a notice that it was created successfully.
10. Manual restore point has been created
Now that you have finished doing the manual restore point, you can close the system window.
Try to download the correct and up-to-date drivers.
This should solve your problem.
Let us know if these steps solve your problem. I hope the information is useful.
Kind regards
Anthony
Microsoft Answers Support Engineer
Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think. -
Q in the use of the Q Protocol
Hello
Can someone explain please a defination and the use of Q in Q Protocol.
Disclaimer
The author of this announcement offers the information in this publication without compensation and with the understanding of the reader that there is no implicit or explicit adequacy or adaptation to any purpose. Information provided is for information purposes only and should not be interpreted as making the professional advice of any kind. Use information from this announcement is only at risk of the reader.
RESPONSIBILITY
Any author will be responsible for any wha2tsoever of damage and interest (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profits) arising out of the use or inability to use the information in the view even if author has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
Poster
This may be a better response https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/welcome, but Q in Q is actually a framework with two headers tag VLAN. It is often used with L2 MetroE providers. It allows the provider to have their own separate VLANs for VLAN client running on their network. For example, on the MetroE provider VLAN 5 network contains all customer traffic VLAN 6 x contains all clients traffic Y, again customer X and the customer is using several VLANS, possibly including VLAN 5 or 6.
-
Help: Adding to the IPsec Tunnel encryption field Questions
Good evening everyone,
I'm looking for help and/or advise in what concerns adding more networking in the field of encryption of an existing IPsec site-to-site tunnel. Both sides of the tunnel are of ASA. The client on the remote end is eager to access the networks more on my end. They have already updated their ACL crypto map to include the new networks. When they perform "show crypto IPsec his counterpart x.x.x.x" it shows already encap packets attempting to join my network.
On my side, I updated my ACL crypto map to reference the new 2 networks, created the double NAT and added the ACL needed to allow the inbound access through ports they want. When I perform a 'see the crypto IPsec his counterpart x.x.x.x' output is NOT up-to-date with the new networks added to the field of encryption. When I run a tracer of package of supply of one of the servers in the new network, the traffic is translated as he should, but a fall when it hits the outgoing interface for the VPN tunnel.
Am I missing something here? Can I bounce the tunnel so that the new networks must be recognized in the surveillance society?
Thanks in advance.
Hello
You must bounce the tunnel when you change the interesting traffic, otherwise the new SA will not be created, is a little funny that you say that SA is already build on the remote side, SA cannot be established only on one side, is like building a new tunnel, if you don't have it on one side, it can not simply prevail and create the entry of SA. In addition, adding new networks and bounce the tunnel you need to generate traffic to trigger the ITS new or you will never see that it created. Check your no nats and routing and it should work.
Best regards, please rate.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Is there a reversal for the hyperlinks does not not after I uninstall Google Chrome
I installed and then immediately uninstalled CHROME. Now all hyperlinks in email don't work. I get the following error message:This operation has been cancelled due to restrictions on this computer. See your administrator.
-
Satellite M55-S139 - no visible wireless network card
Hello Already my Atheros said "great connection" and in fact some programs could run on the wireless internet but no web browser wouldn't work. Today, I bought a new router Belkin N +, and it's the same problem. I downloaded the drivers here http://w
-
Can someone enlighten me on the processors intel above. It is to say what the difference is, are they reliable or if I hold with a pentium 4? Thank you very much
-
Error code: 1327 (cannot install KB2289163, KB2449798 & KB2508974)
KB2289163, KB2449798, KB2508974, impossible to install updates. No codes of error or details just failed. I've tried manual install but get error 1327 Invalid drive H:\ any ideas?
-
Sent Messages not saved, tried everything
Hi guys whenever I have send messages through Windows Mail it does not save the messages to the folder "sent messages". He used to work without any problems to record messagesin this case accordingly. I selected the checkbox (via the tools-> options