ASA 5510 multiple ISP for different purposes

Similar Questions

• Hi, Qus staff associated with multiple user accounts in active directory for different purposes

  Hi, personal related Qus with several user accounts in active directory for a different purpose, at the time of employees who leave employment what is the easiest way to track and disable all the user id created for him? sort of put a link if I disable the main account, other accounts will be disabled?

  Active directory and the server are better asking questions about Technet. http://social.technet.Microsoft.com

• Cisco ASA 5510 multiple dynamic config VPN L2L necessary

  Hello

  We have a Cisco asa 5510 with static IP address. Also, we have a remote office with a dynamic IP address. We now have a dynamic to static VPN configured L2L. And now, we must add new tunnel to another site with a dynamic IP address. Is this possible? Does anyone have an example of woking, or manual?

  Oleg Kobelev

  The config only you need in the ASA is: -.

  (1) set of crypto processing

  (2) political ISAKMP

  (3) dynamic Crypto map

  (4) default group L2L & PSK

  (5) Config RRI (reverse Route Injection)

  HTH >

• I downloaded a template that I need to fill out multiple times for different customers.  How to duplicate the model and save it in Adobe?

  Help

  Hi elir36398870,

  Forming this model is in? If it's a PDF file, then I suggest to make multiple copies before filling for various clients.

  Or whenever you want to save the PDF file, use Save as instead of save option to make a copy of the file.

  Thank you

  Abhishek

• Is it possible to use a different name change automatically preset for different cameras?

  The title says.  Can cards of different cameras automatically call presets naming specific to these cameras when importing?

  Thank you, Ed

  Hi erudolph,

  Well, you can create multiple presets for different cameras renaming you have and select accordingly while import.

  There is no automatic process to select a preset.

  Kind regards

  ~ Mohit

• ASA 5510 - tips for setting up - no internet

  Hi all

  I'll set up an ASA 5510 for the first time using the GUI.

  I put 0/0 0/1 and outside as inside.

  I set up outside with the static WAN address, and it is connected to my ISP.

  But I can't do everything Internet works on the inner harbor. I've read elsewhere, I need to add a static route. Can someone please advise?

  You must place a default route to carry traffic from inside to outside. Use the GUI to place a static route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 for the ip address of your next hop ip of the connection to the ISP.

  Sent by Cisco Support technique Android app

• Same license for different ASA SSL VPN

  Hello

  I have run ASA5510 SSL VPN is installed with a license. I want to replace it with the new ASA5510 without SSL VPN license. Is it possible to copy the license from my old ASA? Can I order different license for my new box?

  THX

  Iwan

  A new license is required.

  License key is created based off the serial number of the device.

  Gilbert

  -Rate, if it helps-

• All necessary licenses on ASA 5510 for old Cisco VPN Client

  We're trying to migrate our firewall Watchguard to a Cisco ASA 5510, who bought some time ago. For some reason, all of our users have already installed the old Cisco VPN client. I think it will work. Are there licensing issues on the 5510 I had to be concerned with?  No matter what special config that needs to be done on the 5510?

  Fix. You don't require licensing of AnyConnect of any type of configuration and the use of IKEv1 IPsec remote access VPN (which use the old Cisco VPN client).

  You will be limited to 250 active IPsec peers (remote access more no matter what VPN site-to-site) by the platform (hardware) device capabilities that are enforced by the software.

• Chrombook L2TP/IPSec for ASA 5510

  Hello

  I have trouble getting a chromebook to establish a remote access connection VPN using L2TP/IPsec for a Cisco ASA 5510 12 7.2 (5) running.

  Run a debug crypto isakmp 5 I see the following logs (ip changed...)

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 1.1.1.1, Oakley proposal is acceptable

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 1.1.1.1, IKE SA proposal # 1, turn # 1 entry overall IKE acceptable matches # 4

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: IP = 1.1.1.1, connection landed on tunnel_group DefaultRAGroup

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, status of automatic NAT detection: remote endpoint IS behind a NAT device this end is NOT behind a NAT device

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: IP = 1.1.1.1, connection landed on tunnel_group DefaultRAGroup

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, previously allocated memory of liberation for permission-dn-attributes

  06 jan 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, PHASE 1 COMPLETED

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: IP = 1.1.1.1, Keep-alive type for this connection: DPD

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, timer to generate a new key to start P1: 8100 seconds.

  06 jan 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, PHASE 1 COMPLETED

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: IP = 1.1.1.1, Keep-alive type for this connection: DPD

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, timer to generate a new key to start P1: 8100 seconds.

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, data received in payload ID remote Proxy Host: address 3.3.3.3, 17 of the Protocol, Port 1701

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, data received in payload ID local Proxy Host: address 2.2.2.2, 17 of the Protocol, Port 1701

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, detected L2TP/IPSec session.

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, QM IsRekeyed its not found old addr

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, static checking Card Crypto, check card = outside_map, seq = 1...

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, static checking Card Crypto Card = outside_map, seq = 1, ACL does not proxy IDs src:1.1.1.1 dst: 2.2.2.2

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, only Tunnel UDP-encapsulated and UDP-encapsulated-Transport mode NAT-Traversal-defined selection

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, remote peer IKE configured crypto card: outside_dyn_map0

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, ITS processing IPSec payload

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, proposals of any IPSec security association has deemed unacceptable.

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, error QM WSF (P2 struct & 0x3d48800, mess id 0xce12c3dc).

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, history of mistake IKE responder QM WSF (struct & 0x3d48800) , : QM_DONE EV_ERROR--> QM_BLD_MSG2 EV_NEGO_SA--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_IS_REKEY--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_CONFIRM_SA--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_PROC_MSG--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_HASH_OK--> QM_BLD_MSG2, NullEvent--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_COMP_HASH

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, removing counterpart table correlator failed, no match!

  1.1.1.1 = address remote chromebook NAT

  2.2.2.2 = ASA 5510 acting as distance termintaion access point

  3.3.3.3 = Chromebook private address

  I noticed that the Chromebook is appearing as the ID of the remote proxy but later, he seeks the applied to the Chromebook NAT address.  Not sure if this is the cause or how to solve this problem, if it is.

  Can someone advise please

  Thank you

  Ryan

  7.2 is old code.  You can re - test with 9.0.x or 9.1.x.

  https://support.Google.com/Chromebook/answer/1282338?hl=en

• Cisco Anyconnect/WebVPN license for ASA 5510

  Hello

  Someone could please check the licenses for ASA 5510 attachment and let me know. We currently have ASA 5510 with basic license. According to the table attached under VPN sessions, he mentions that "250 combined SESSIONS IPSec and WebVPN" and to "Max box of WebVPN Session" it is mentioned that 2nd meeting, exceeding that we must buy license optional webvpn. While we the 250 combined license for IPSec and webVPN. We must purchase additional anyconnect license to set up remote access for users who want to use the internal resources from outside the network. OrElse, we don't have to purchase license and can configure webvpn/anyconnect of existing combined license existing users basic ASA license? Waiting for your response. Thank you.

  You are welcome.

  1 Yes

  2 AnyConnect requires no Java, but it can he use when connecting to one AnyConnect SSL VPN client and launch the Web browser option start Java-based. There was a bug with the AnyConnect old versions had later who should have addresses. You also have the option to launch via IE and using ActiveX or simply throw AnyConnect directly - neither of these two methods require Java.

  Here is a document TAC on the Java questions if you want more details.

  Please take a moment to note the useful messages and mark your answers questions.

• ASA 5510, get the right pair

  Hi, I have a 5510 with security more on 7.2 (3) and I'm looking to pick up a 2nd economic unit on eBay to set up like a pair of HA a/s. Of course, there is a little supply, and one I am looking at matches closely enough. My question to the Board of Directors is how special is licensing when it comes to match? Both are Security Plus, and I don't understand why the discrepancies in Max VLAN, security contexts, and a few other parameters.

  My reading abt licensing indicates different levels of security over for example Max VLAN is just indicated that 100. I think it's because the #2 is on 7.0 (3). Maybe some of these features have increased in later versions? But I have no way to control until I have buy TI -.

  The plan will be to upgrade all two to 8.2 and bump mine to 1 GB to match... I wanted to just make sure that I wouldn't be in a situation where they would not match for some reason any. Thanks in advance

  Mine

  Material: ASA5510, 256 MB of RAM, processor Pentium 4 Celeron 1600 MHz

  Internal ATA Compact Flash, 256 MB

  BIOS Flash M50FW080 @ 0xffe00000, 1024 KB

  The devices allowed for this platform:

  The maximum physical Interfaces: unlimited

  VLAN maximum: 100

  Internal hosts: unlimited

  Failover: Active/active

  VPN - A: enabled

  VPN-3DES-AES: enabled

  Security contexts: 2

  GTP/GPRS: disabled

  VPN peers: 250

  WebVPN peers: 2

  This platform includes an ASA 5510 Security Plus license.

  Project #2

  Material: ASA5510, 1024 MB RAM, Pentium 4 Celeron 1600 MHz processor
  Internal ATA Compact Flash, 256 MB
  BIOS Flash Firmware Hub @ 0xffe00000, 1024 KB

  The devices allowed for this platform:
  The maximum physical Interfaces: unlimited
  VLAN maximum: 25
  Internal hosts: unlimited
  Failover: Active / standby
  VPN - A: enabled
  VPN-3DES-AES: enabled
  Security contexts: 0
  GTP/GPRS: disabled
  VPN peers: 150

  This platform includes an ASA 5510 Security Plus license.

  Hello

  Indeed, there are some differences that you need to fix in order to be able to have a failover pair, BUT as you increase her memory... Why don't you go to 8.3 as the restriction of licenses will disappear for failover purposes,

  the units will now share it instead to compare

  concerning

• Cisco ASA 5510 L2L VPN on the backup interface

  OK, here is what I have and I even if I knew how to do this, but it has not worked for me.  I hope someone out there can help you.

  I have an ASA 5510 running 8.4 with double configuration of ISPs on 2 different interfaces: outside (primary), backup (backup).  I also have a site to site VPN ASA another in another city.  The VPN is now configured on the external interface and works very well.  What I wanted to do, is to make the VPN running on backup interface only.

  So, I changed the card encryption on the remote side to use the backup interface IP and created a tunnel-group for her.  Then, I created a map encryption for backup interface and activated ikev1 on it.  The default route is configured to use the external interface, so I created a static route that routes traffic destined for the external interface of the remote side to the backup interface default gateway.  I can get to establish tunnels, but no traffic passes through them.  I have however while I need a NAT device for the tunnel traffic to I created a NAT so but still no transmitted traffic.  I tried the packet - trace and he said: the traffic was allowed and show its crypto ipsec command, I see the configuration of the tunnel, but no traffic will pass through it.  Can anyone help?

  Ben,

  you use a code to version 8.4, I recommend starting by removing the config NAT statements at both ends. This version does not have the NAT and control, and if you don't need... I've seen instances with 8.4 (3) where a NAT even though apparently correct was causing not to pass through the traffic.

  Site A:

  NAT (inside, backup) source static obj-SiteALAN obj-SiteALAN static obj-SiteBLAN obj-SiteBLAN

  Site b:

  NAT (inside, outside) source static obj - 192.168.5.0 obj - 192.168.5.0 destination static obj - 192.168.3.0 obj - 192.168.3.0

  If possible, you should increase your AES encryption, but this is a personal point of view and should not stop the traffic through the links. You should be able to see the counters for the data transmitted / received are these incrementing?

  Do you have the ACLs that are from the inside to the outside and internal interface to the Interface of backup (duplicated.

  In this model, the control is the routing.

  Best regards

  Ju

  http://helpamunky.WordPress.com/

• Allow specific access through the Interfaces ASA 5510

  Hi all

  In my quest to learn Cisco IOS and devices, I need help in smoothing traffic, or access lists, allowing traffic between internal interfaces on the SAA specifically.

  I have an ASA 5510:

  WAN/LAN/DMZ ports labled E0/0 (LAN), E0/1 (WAN), E0/2 (DMZ).

  Connected to the port E0/0 is a 2811 router

  Connected to the port E0/1 is the (external) Internet

  Connected to the port E0/2 is a 2821

  (I'll add a 3745 for VOIP) port E0/3, but it has not yet happened.

  I want to allow traffic between the 2821 and the 2811 routers so that devices on the networks behind them can talk to each other.

  I've specified specific subnets between the ASA and the routers because I want to learn how to shape traffic behind routers, as well as on the ASA. So behind the routers I have different VLANS, but I'm not restrict access between them, still, at least I don't think I am. But as it is, behind the 2821 devices cannot access the DNS / DOMAIN SERVER that is located behind the 2811. Right now I have the routers DHCP power, who works there. Currently devices behind the router 2821-3560 switch cannot access the domain server, primary dns server.

  How can I set the ASA to allow traffic to flow between the two routers and their VLANS?

  Here's the configs of each device and I have also included my switch configs, incase something should be set on them. I only removed the passwords and the parts of the external IP address. I appreciate the help in which States to create and on which devices.

  I think it is best that I put the links to the files of text here.

  Thank you!

  You must remove the following statements on the two routers:
  -# ip nat inside source... overload
  -for each # ip nat inside/outside interface, if they have configured.

  Remove ads rip of the networks that are not directly connected:
  -2821: 172.16.0.0, 192.168.1.0, 199.195.xxx.0
  -2811: 199.195.xxx.0
  -ASA: 128.0.0.0

  No way should be added to the routers, since he is the one by default, put in scene to ASA.

  Check the tables of routing on routers and the ASA.

  On ASA:

  -Remove:
  object-group network # PAT - SOURCE
  # nat (indoor, outdoor) automatic interface after PAT-SOURCE dynamic source

  -create objects of the networks behind the LAN router and enable dynamic NAT:
  network object #.
  subnet
  NAT (inside, outside) dynamic interface

  -review remains NAT rules.

  -to set/adjust the lists access penetration on the interfaces. Do not forget to allow the rip on the LAN and DMZ interfaces.

  -Disable rip on the outside interface.

• ASA 5510 Configuration. How to set up 2 outside the interface.

  Hello

  I have Cisco ASA 5510 and the desktop, I want to create a new route to another (external) router to my ISP.

  The workstation I can Ping ASA E0/2 interface but I cannot ping the router ISP B inside and outside of the interface.

  I based my setup on the existing configuration. which so far is working

  interface Ethernet0/0
  Outside of the interface description
  nameif outside
  security-level 0
  IP 122.55.71.138 address 255.255.255.2
  !
  interface Ethernet0/1
  Inside the interface description
  nameif inside
  security-level 100
  IP 10.34.63.252 255.255.240.0
  !
  interface Ethernet0/2
  Outside of the interface description
  nameif outside
  security-level 0
  IP 121.97.64.178 255.255.255.240
  !

  Global 1 interface (outside)

  global (outside) 2 interface (I created this for E0/2)
  NAT (inside) 0 access-list sheep

  NAT (inside) 1 10.34.48.11 255.255.255.255 (work: router ISP inside and outside interface E0/0)

  NAT (inside) 2 10.34.48.32 255.255.255.255 (work: E0/2 router ISP on the inside interface only but cant outside ping).

  Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 122.55.71.139 1 (work)

  Route outside 10.34.48.32 255.255.255.255 121.97.64.179 1 (the new Road Test)

  Router ISP, that a job can ping and I can access the internet

  interface FastEthernet0/0
  Description Connection to ASA5510
  IP 122.55.71.139 255.255.255.248
  no ip redirection
  no ip proxy-arp
  IP nat inside
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  !
  the interface S0/0
  IP 111.54.29.122 255.255.255.252
  no ip redirection
  no ip proxy-arp
  NAT outside IP
  !
  IP nat inside source static 122.55.71.139 111.54.29.122
  IP http server
  IP classless
  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial0/0

  FAI 2

  interface FastEthernet0/0 (SAA can ping this interface)
  Description Connection to ASA5510
  IP 121.97.64.179 255.255.255.248
  no ip redirection
  no ip proxy-arp
  IP nat inside
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  !
  interface E0/0 (ASA Can not ping this interface)
  IP 121.97.69.122 255.255.255.252
  no ip redirection
  no ip proxy-arp
  NAT outside IP
  !
  IP nat inside source static 121.97.64.179 121.97.69.122
  IP http server
  IP classless
  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 E0/0

  CABLES

  ASA to router ISP B (straight cable)

  Router ISP in the UDI (straight cable)

  Hope you could give some advice and the solution for this kind of problem please

  Hello

  Are you able to ping the router IP of the interface of the device of the ASA? If so, try a trace of package on the device of the SAA for traffic to the IP address of the router.

  Thank you and best regards,

  Maryse Amrodia

• Cisco ASA 5510 - restrictions of VPN (AnyConnect) based on the AD user or IP address

  Hello

  I want to test how to restrict access user on an ASA 5510 AnyConnect. In politics, I can define what networks will go through the VPN tunnel and which not (split tunneling). The ASA has a LDAP connection and only AD users with a special security group can connect over AnyConnect.
  On the other hand I would like to restrict access for special users within a VPN policy.

  So my question:
  What are your recommendations to implement this szenario?

  My two ideas would be:
  1. the access rules based on the user of the AD.
  2. special reserve IP addresses in the pool of addresses AnyConnect for some users, so I can limit access to the normal firewall rules base based on the source IP address.

  What are your recommendations and is it possible to realize my ideas (and how)?

  Thanks in advance

  Best regards

  Hello

  I will suggest that you configure a second ad group in the server and another group strategy in the ASA, you can configure certain access on each group policy "the installer of the filters, assign different split political tunnel, different ACL' and in the ad server, you can assign users for example to the AD Group A and AD Group B based on the access you want to give them now , you must configure LDAP mapping to assign the user specific group policy that you want based on the AD group that they belong.

  You can follow this documentation that will help you configure the LDAP Mapping:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/ASA-5500-x-series-NEX...

  Best regards, please rate.