Chrombook L2TP/IPSec for ASA 5510
Hello
I have trouble getting a chromebook to establish a remote access connection VPN using L2TP/IPsec for a Cisco ASA 5510 12 7.2 (5) running.
Run a debug crypto isakmp 5 I see the following logs (ip changed...)
Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 1.1.1.1, Oakley proposal is acceptable
Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 1.1.1.1, IKE SA proposal # 1, turn # 1 entry overall IKE acceptable matches # 4
Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: IP = 1.1.1.1, connection landed on tunnel_group DefaultRAGroup
Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, status of automatic NAT detection: remote endpoint IS behind a NAT device this end is NOT behind a NAT device
Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: IP = 1.1.1.1, connection landed on tunnel_group DefaultRAGroup
Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, previously allocated memory of liberation for permission-dn-attributes
06 jan 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, PHASE 1 COMPLETED
Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: IP = 1.1.1.1, Keep-alive type for this connection: DPD
Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, timer to generate a new key to start P1: 8100 seconds.
06 jan 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, PHASE 1 COMPLETED
Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: IP = 1.1.1.1, Keep-alive type for this connection: DPD
Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, timer to generate a new key to start P1: 8100 seconds.
Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, data received in payload ID remote Proxy Host: address 3.3.3.3, 17 of the Protocol, Port 1701
Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, data received in payload ID local Proxy Host: address 2.2.2.2, 17 of the Protocol, Port 1701
Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, detected L2TP/IPSec session.
Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, QM IsRekeyed its not found old addr
Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, static checking Card Crypto, check card = outside_map, seq = 1...
Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, static checking Card Crypto Card = outside_map, seq = 1, ACL does not proxy IDs src:1.1.1.1 dst: 2.2.2.2
Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, only Tunnel UDP-encapsulated and UDP-encapsulated-Transport mode NAT-Traversal-defined selection
Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, remote peer IKE configured crypto card: outside_dyn_map0
Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, ITS processing IPSec payload
Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, proposals of any IPSec security association has deemed unacceptable.
Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, error QM WSF (P2 struct & 0x3d48800, mess id 0xce12c3dc).
Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, history of mistake IKE responder QM WSF (struct & 0x3d48800)
Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, removing counterpart table correlator failed, no match! 1.1.1.1 = address remote chromebook NAT 2.2.2.2 = ASA 5510 acting as distance termintaion access point 3.3.3.3 = Chromebook private address I noticed that the Chromebook is appearing as the ID of the remote proxy but later, he seeks the applied to the Chromebook NAT address. Not sure if this is the cause or how to solve this problem, if it is. Can someone advise please Thank you Ryan 7.2 is old code. You can re - test with 9.0.x or 9.1.x. https://support.Google.com/Chromebook/answer/1282338?hl=en Tags: Cisco Security Cisco Anyconnect/WebVPN license for ASA 5510 Hello Someone could please check the licenses for ASA 5510 attachment and let me know. We currently have ASA 5510 with basic license. According to the table attached under VPN sessions, he mentions that "250 combined SESSIONS IPSec and WebVPN" and to "Max box of WebVPN Session" it is mentioned that 2nd meeting, exceeding that we must buy license optional webvpn. While we the 250 combined license for IPSec and webVPN. We must purchase additional anyconnect license to set up remote access for users who want to use the internal resources from outside the network. OrElse, we don't have to purchase license and can configure webvpn/anyconnect of existing combined license existing users basic ASA license? Waiting for your response. Thank you. You are welcome. 1 Yes 2 AnyConnect requires no Java, but it can he use when connecting to one AnyConnect SSL VPN client and launch the Web browser option start Java-based. There was a bug with the AnyConnect old versions had later who should have addresses. You also have the option to launch via IE and using ActiveX or simply throw AnyConnect directly - neither of these two methods require Java. Here is a document TAC on the Java questions if you want more details. Please take a moment to note the useful messages and mark your answers questions. Hello I configured on ASA windows L2TP/Ipsec connections. Phase 1 and 2 are successful, the tunnel is created but immediately after this deletet. Tested from windows XP and windows 7. I use DefaultRAGroup for that (can not use any group which is by default not - limitation of windows). Here is my config: attributes of Group Policy DfltGrpPolicy attributes global-tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup Crypto-map dynamic outside_dyn_map 10 the value transform-set TRANS_ESP_AES_SHA TRANS_ESP_DES_SHA ESP-AES-256-SHA ESP-AES-256-MD5 ESP-AES-128-SHA ESP-AES-128-MD5 MD5-ESP-3DES ESP-3DES-SHA ESP-DES-MD5 ESP-DES-SHA And here are some logs: 17 February 13:27:07 vpnasa1 February 17, 2010 13:27:07 vpnasa1: % ASA-7-715027: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 193.193.193.193, IPSec SA proposal # 1, turn # 1 entry overall SA IPSec acceptable matches # 10 17 February 13:27:07 vpnasa1 February 17, 2010 13:27:07 vpnasa1: % ASA-7-710005: UDP request and eliminated from 193.193.193.193/4204 outside: outside-interface/4500
17 February 13:27:10 vpnasa1 February 17, 2010 13:27:10 vpnasa1: % ASA-4-113019: Group = DefaultRAGroup, username =, IP = 193.193.193.193, disconnected Session. Session type: IPsecOverNatT, duration: 0 h: 00 m: 03 s, xmt bytes: 795 bytes RRs: 1204, reason: L2TP initiated What's wrong? Thanx Please go ahead and activate the following command:4204>0xFFFFFFFF>193.193.193.193>
ISAKMP nat-traversal crypto Try again. Hi guys There are IPsec deadline for ASA 5510? There are users complain on connected, they cannot access any server on the local network. but now it works fine Hello What do you mean by limit? The number of IPSEC sessions is limited to 250, if I remember correctly. To limit access to internal resources, there is not. These users complain using the same IPSEC vpn as others? Is that your exemption of crypto and nat that allows all internal resources? Thank you PS: Please do not forget to rate and score as correct answer if this answered your question Cisco ASA 5510 + license + AIP - SSM Hello. I have this box. I have a few questions about it. (1) I'll be able to update the firmware (from 8.2 to 8.3 or greater for example) without smarnet for ASA 5510? And what can not do without smartnet? (2) I have only AIP-SSM-10 module this ASA 5510. is there a smartnet, too? And when I buy only one module is it build in a subscription for 1 year for the signatures of the IPS? (3) if I have the Cisco ASA 5510 base license, my IPS on AIP-SSM-10 will work? (4) as I foresee in a purchase of the year a 5510 more with the same module and mount ther of failover. I really need license Security more than failover (active / standby)? For active/active, I know I need one, Yes? Please help me. (1) you must Smartnet in order to download the software from the download from cisco.com site. (2) Yes, there is also a smartnet for the AIP module. Module AIP does not come with one year subscription, but you can ask for a demo license. (3) Yes, the basic license is OK for the AIP module. (4) Yes, you would need license security more on the two ASA to be able to run any type of failover on ASA5510. Hope that answers your questions. All necessary licenses on ASA 5510 for old Cisco VPN Client We're trying to migrate our firewall Watchguard to a Cisco ASA 5510, who bought some time ago. For some reason, all of our users have already installed the old Cisco VPN client. I think it will work. Are there licensing issues on the 5510 I had to be concerned with? No matter what special config that needs to be done on the 5510? Fix. You don't require licensing of AnyConnect of any type of configuration and the use of IKEv1 IPsec remote access VPN (which use the old Cisco VPN client). You will be limited to 250 active IPsec peers (remote access more no matter what VPN site-to-site) by the platform (hardware) device capabilities that are enforced by the software. How to determine the cause of the ipsec tunnel fall on ASA 5510 Is there an easy way to determine the cause of tunnel VPN ipsec l2l fall on one asa 5510? I have enabled logging, but the buffer is full so fast, I can't find something when it is 24 hours later. I'm working on obtaining a server/aggregator syslog configuration but... until it is complete I need a temporary measure. Suggestions? Hi Jessica. For the buffering limit, you can try: Increase the maximum buffer size. limit the newspapers to the class of vpn: Buffered Debug class vpn connection. On the other hand, you can try him debugs: Debug crypto peer peer_address condition debugging cry isa 128 debugging ipsec 128 cry If you lose the ssh session debugging is disabled. Finally for the vpn tunnels usually it goes down due to: Idle time-out the dead peer detection remove it from the other end. HTH. For this preface, I use the server in a lab environment and trying to set up my own VPN L2TP/IPSec. I opened the UDP 500 and 1701 TCP ports on my router for the interface of the primary server where is the VPN. It is on a Comcast connection consumer where other applications such as Arma 3 servers dedicated and IIS have worked. When the connection I get error 789: L2TP connection attempt failed because the security layer detected a processing error during initial negotiations with the remote computer. From what I've seen, this can be fixed by checking that the two ends of the connection are not behind a NAT (not an option), verification of the PSK (already done) and certificates (not applicable). If there is a way to solve this problem that would be great, but my server will always be behind a NAT firewall because the router is one, and the modem becomes one if several devices are connected to him without a router between the two. ASA 5510 - tips for setting up - no internet Hi all I'll set up an ASA 5510 for the first time using the GUI. I put 0/0 0/1 and outside as inside. I set up outside with the static WAN address, and it is connected to my ISP. But I can't do everything Internet works on the inner harbor. I've read elsewhere, I need to add a static route. Can someone please advise? You must place a default route to carry traffic from inside to outside. Use the GUI to place a static route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 for the ip address of your next hop ip of the connection to the ISP. Sent by Cisco Support technique Android app IPSEC with the router and asa 5510 Hi all I have problems connecting ipsec l2l. I have set up a router and asa 5510 make ipsec between them, but it seems to fail on the phase 1. I already check and I am 100% sure that is the key. You can a few shed light on the issue, I have. Here's the output debug I get the two system. Thank you Hello Isakmp policy match on both devices? What version of ios is running on the router and the asa5510 Thank you Disable ipsec for l2tp vpn connection? Hello How can I disable ipsec for l2tp vpn connection? I use a linux vpn that offers only l2tp. I remember doing this with winxp in regedit. [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE/SYSTEM/CurrentControlSet/Services/RasMan/settings] "ProhibitIpSec" = DWORD: 00000001 How is it possible in win7? Thank you. Thank you for visiting the Microsoft answers community site. The question you have posted is related to Linux and would be better suited to the community network. Please visit the link below to find a community that will provide the support you want. http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/w7itpronetworking/threads Microsoft l2tp IPSec VPN site to site ASA on top I have a specialized applications casino that requires end-to-end encryption. I'm under the stack of Microsoft IPSec l2tp between my XP machine and my Windows 2003 server on the LAN. Can I use the same type of protocol stack Microsoft l2tp IPSec between my XP machine and the Windows Server 2003 a branch on the SAA to site to site ASA VPN tunnel? The VPN site-to site ASA is a type of key Preshare IPSec VPN tunnelle traffic between our head office and a branch in distance. In other words, the ASA site-to-site IPSec VPN will allow Microsoft l2tp through IPSec encrypted traffic? My ACL tunnel would allow full IP access between site. Something like: name 192.168.100.0 TexasSubnet name 192.168.200.0 RenoSubnet IP TexasSubnet 255.255.255.0 RenoSubnet 255.255.255.0 allow Access-list extended nat_zero Hello Yes, the L2TP can be encapsulated in IPSEC as all other traffic. However, make sure that no NAT is performed on each end. L2TP is a default header protection which will see NAT as a falsification of package and reject it. See you soon,. Daniel Hello So I'm pretty familiar with asa But not many with VPNS My goal is to get as much security as possible when a user via the vpn connection which means, I want the user to connect with a user name, password and a certificate is just for this user and not a group certificate also to validate the user via LDAP But if the two cannot do it together, it is more important for me, the first option I mentioned so my question is, how can it be done on the asa? is it possible to connect by using a different certificate each user It was possible on my old firewall using OpenVpn I want to use the asa as the certificate server I use 6.4 AMPS ASA 5510 Software version 8.4 (4) Thanks in advance. For the legacy VPN Client, you can use a certification of company as that integrate Windows Server 2 k 3/2 k 8. The ASA-CA SSL - VPN only are supported. But for a new deployment you should really go for the AnyConnect Client. Support for L2TP/IpSec VPN on 1921 Hello I am not able to find an answer on something very simple... Fact of 1921 Cisco router supports L2TP/IpSec VPN connections? (from Windows 7 clients) If she could please point me to the right location/document where I can read more about it. I already tried with the configuration below, but command ppp under a virtual-Template1 don't output interface. Thank you very much for your answers. Kind regards Herman # VPN configuration I've tried, but it did not work. crypto ISAKMP policy 1 BA 3des preshared authentication Group 2 life 4000 ISAKMP crypto key xxxxxxx address X.X.X.X (ip strongvpn) ! ! Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES256-SHA1 esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac transport mode ! Map 10 IPSEC L2TP ipsec-isakmp crypto defined peer X.X.X.X game of transformation-ESP-AES256-SHA1 match address 101 ! ! ! Pseudowire-class pwclass1 encapsulation l2tpv2 local IP interface FastEthernet0/0 PMTU IP ! ! ! ! interface FastEthernet0/0 DHCP IP address automatic duplex automatic speed card crypto IPSEC L2TP ! interface FastEthernet0/1 IP 10.20.20.1 255.255.255.0 IP nat inside IP virtual-reassembly automatic duplex automatic speed ! interface Serial0/0/0 no ip address Shutdown ! interface Serial0/1/0 no ip address Shutdown 2000000 clock frequency ! virtual-PPP1 interface the negotiated IP address IP mtu 1399 NAT outside IP IP virtual-reassembly max-pumping 64 No cdp enable PPP authentication ms-chap-v2 callin PPP chap hostname vpnxxx PPP chap password 0 xxxxxxxxxx Pseudowire pw-class 1, pwclass1 X.X.X.X ################################################################################################################## Cisco-gw #show version Cisco IOS software, software C1900 (C1900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.2 (4) M2, VERSION of the SOFTWARE (fc2) Technical support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport Copyright (c) 1986-2012 by Cisco Systems, Inc. Updated Thursday, November 7, 12 and 12:45 by prod_rel_team ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 15.0 M16 (1r), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Cisco-gw uptime is 2 days, 4 hours, 22 minutes System to regain the power ROM System restart to 09:11:07 PCTime Tuesday, April 2, 2013 System image file is "usbflash0:c1900 - universalk9-mz.» Spa. 152 - 4.M2.bin. Last reload type: normal charging Reload last reason: power This product contains cryptographic features and is under the United States States and local laws governing the import, export, transfer and use. Delivery of Cisco cryptographic products does not imply third party approval to import, export, distribute or use encryption. Importers, exporters, distributors and users are responsible for compliance with U.S. laws and local countries. By using this product you agree to comply with the regulations and laws in force. If you are unable to satisfy the United States and local laws, return the product. A summary of U.S. laws governing Cisco cryptographic products to: http://www.Cisco.com/WWL/export/crypto/tool/stqrg.html If you need assistance please contact us by mail at Cisco CISCO1921/K9 (revision 1.0) with 491520K / 32768K bytes of memory. Card processor ID FCZ170793UH 2 gigabit Ethernet interfaces 1 line of terminal 1 module of virtual private network (VPN)
Configuration of DRAM is 64 bits wide with disabled parity. 255K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 249840K bytes of Flash usbflash0 (read/write) License info: License IDU: ------------------------------------------------- Device SN # PID ------------------------------------------------- * 0 CISCO1921/K9
Technology for the Module package license information: "c1900". ----------------------------------------------------------------- Technology-technology-package technology Course Type next reboot ------------------------------------------------------------------ IPBase ipbasek9 ipbasek9 Permanent Security securityk9 Permanent securityk9 given none none none Configuration register is 0 x 2102 Yes, it is supported. It is necessary to configure the encapsulation under virtual-model. Note: you will have much better results by using the IPSec VPN or SSL VPN client AnyConnect client. ASA 5510 IPSEC VPN connection problem Hello We have an ASA 5510 (ASA version 8.0) of remote access VPN configured and works most of the time, but there is a problem when you have more than one client that connects to the same office remotely. When the first VPN client is connected to the remote desktop, everything works fine, but when the second client connects to the VPN, it connects fine but do not get any traffice return to customer. I can see under monitor-> statistical VPN-> Sessions-> remote access-> Rx Bytes is 0. Both connections are from the same public IP address of the remote desktop. I changed some settings on NAT - T and a few other things, but without success. Could someone help me please how to fix this? Thank you very much. Make sure that customers use because that probably her you're not. (default value is NAT - T). Federico. I run Windows 7 64 bit. I was about to install a new machine and, in the process, done something to cause Firefox to not display much of the formatting in the pages I visit. The missing information includes background color and contours and colors, t 6.18 Skype does not go/blockages at startup I have recently installed a game and had problems with the drivers and were able to correct that error, however in the process of that, Skype starts, and when a message is released, I'll be getting 3 different file names, which change every time afte When you use Boinc computer software for sharing at high temperature I have a z600 with 2 x 5550 cpu and 24 GB of ram. When I try to run it above 60% load it reached 91 c with the Core Temp software. The computer is clean and free of dust. Is this normal? How to make the Subvi when I make use of the structure of the event Hello everyone I don't really understand how to make use of Subvi when I use the event structures in vi? When just make buttons on the controls Subvi connectors and assign them the vi stops working as I expected. I've added an example vi I do not ope Symantec TDI and NDIS drivers are not compatible. Impossible to uninstall Original title: I have a compatibility problem with symantec TDI and NDIS says that they are not compatible with windows vista. I can't uninstall them? I uninstalled the old version of anti virus but can't seem to get rid of these two drivers? ThankSimilar Questions
value of 10.1.1.1 WINS server
value of server DNS 10.1.1.1
VPN-idle-timeout 300
Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec l2tp ipsec svc webvpn
the authentication of the user activation
allow to NEM
NAC-parameters DfltGrpPolicy-NAC-framework-create value
WebVPN
SVC keepalive no
client of dpd-interval SVC no
dpd-interval SVC bridge no
value of customization DfltCustomization
asa-admins address pool
authentication-server-group CSACS
IPSec-attributes tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup
pre-shared-key *.
Disable ISAKMP keepalive
tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup ppp-attributes
PAP Authentication
ms-chap-v2 authentication
eap-proxy authentication
map outside_map 65535-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic outside_dyn_map
outside_map interface card crypto outside
17 February 13:27:07 vpnasa1 February 17, 2010 13:27:07 vpnasa1: % ASA-6-602303: IPSEC: outgoing remote access to ITS (SPI = 0xAEA59455) between the outside of the interface and 193.193.193.193 (user = DefaultRAGroup) was created.
17 February 13:27:07 vpnasa1 February 17, 2010 13:27:07 vpnasa1: % ASA-7-715007: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 193.193.193.193, IKE got a msg KEY_ADD for SA: SPI = 0xaea59455
17 February 13:27:07 vpnasa1 February 17, 2010 13:27:07 vpnasa1: % ASA-6-602303: IPSEC: incoming remote access to ITS (SPI = 0x9D3B8BDE) between the outside of the interface and 193.193.193.193 (user = DefaultRAGroup) was created.
17 February 13:27:07 vpnasa1 February 17, 2010 13:27:07 vpnasa1: % ASA-7-715077: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 193.193.193.193, pitcher: received KEY_UPDATE, spi 0x9d3b8bde
17 February 13:27:07 vpnasa1 February 17, 2010 13:27:07 vpnasa1: % ASA-7-715080: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 193.193.193.193, timer to generate a new key to start P2: 3060 seconds.
17 February 13:27:07 vpnasa1 February 17, 2010 13:27:07 vpnasa1: % 713120-5-ASA: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 193.193.193.193, PHASE 2 COMPLETED (msgid = 00000001)
17 February 13:27:07 vpnasa1 February 17, 2010 13:27:07 vpnasa1: % ASA-7-713906: IKEQM_Active() Add L2TP classification rules: ip <193.193.193.193>mask <0xFFFFFFFF>port<4204>
17 February 13:27:08 vpnasa1 February 17, 2010 13:27:08 vpnasa1: % ASA-7-710005: UDP request and eliminated from 193.193.193.193/4204 outside: outside-interface/1701
17 February 13:27:08 vpnasa1 February 17, 2010 13:27:08 vpnasa1: % ASA-6-302016: connection UDP disassembly 56281479 for outside:193.193.193.193/4204 of identity: outside-interface/1701 duration 0:01:07 431 bytes
17 February 13:27:10 vpnasa1 February 17, 2010 13:27:10 vpnasa1: % ASA-6-302015: built connection UDP incoming 56282536 for outside:193.193.193.193/4204 (193.193.193.193/4204) to the identity: outside-interface/1701 (outside-interface/1701)
17 February 13:27:10 vpnasa1 February 17, 2010 13:27:10 vpnasa1: % ASA-6-603106: L2TP Tunnel created, tunnel_id 50, remote_peer_ip is 193.193.193.193 ppp_virtual_interface_id 1, client_dynamic_ip is 0.0.0.0 username is user1
17 February 13:27:10 vpnasa1 February 17, 2010 13:27:10 vpnasa1: % ASA-6-603107: L2TP Tunnel deleted, tunnel_id = 50 remote_peer_ip = 193.193.193.193
The RRAS role to run based on this tutorial: http://www.thomasmaurer.ch/2014/01/how-to-install-vpn-on-windows-server-2012-r2/ I have only strayed from it using DHCP forwarding instead of a static pool of IP as my router is running a DHCP server, and if I understand correctly, the router must give IP addresses of the internal IP pool which I use for everything else. I also use the PSK authentication rather than be based certificate. For the authentication of users I have MS-CHAP-V2 and CHAP enabled; I connect from the remote device with an account on that I created on the server for the purpose of this VPN I know RRAS connections are allowed.
This issue is beyond the scope of this site and must be placed on Technet or MSDNMaybe you are looking for