ASA VPN routing

Hi all. I have an asa 5510 connected to a switch 3750 with RIP, routing between the two devices. I have problems passing the VPN subnet via rip to the 3750. I probably do not understand how the routing table is filled on the asa so patient with me. I noticed that the routing table is filled with the VPN subnet, when clients connect. So, for example, I 192.168.1.1/32 client 1 connects to the routing table of asa. I then put static redistribution in place through rip on the asa. However, the 3750 never receives the rip update of the asa. All other channels are exchanged between thin devices. Any suggestions?

Sent by Cisco Support technique Android app

OK good to know that all Saran works fine now for you!

If you want to RIP through the POOL VPN, you must enable IPP on the SAA, would be to inject the pool VPN in the routing of the ASA table, which makes the ASA see it as a static route, and then you move forward on your type of RIP "Redistribute static" process The ASA would pass it along as a well known road of his table.

Believe me, I went through the same thing as you are now, a few years back! It was a pain in the neck but finally had someone who helped me with it! It took me almost 1 month to get help. On the side VPN seem ok, but I couldn't reach my home network. I was told to do what I mentioned at the top.

Regarding the graphics integrated circuits in the network, they seem ok to configure and ask them to do the work for you, but if not well thought to before implementation, you could probably yourself shot in the leg with her on the road. For me before I understood of IGP I very well understand the static. That helped me understand the routing protocols.

I'm glad you're OK.

Have a good one Phil

Ted

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • ASA at PIX VPN - routing

    Hi all, I built a site 2 site between an ASA 5510 and a PIX IPsec tunnel.  The tunnel is up, and most of the time the traffic flow between source and destination LANs as planned. The problem is that we need the ASA to send syslog messages in the VPN tunnel to a syslog on PIX site server.  If I get a router on the ASA website, I ping the site of PIX syslog server.   The following statement is in the ASA:

    Route out of pix.net.addr sub.net.mask next.hop

    But in the journal of the ASA, I see messages "Routing failed" for the traffic of the SAA on the syslog server.

    April 8, 2010 08:32:01 ASA5510: % ASA-6-110003: routing could not locate the next hop for icmp NP identity Ifc:10.xx.x.xx/0 to inside:172.xx.x.xx/0

    Any thoughts?

    Thank you

    Robert

    Hello

    Public IP address of the ASA must be in interesting for this tunnel traffic (since it's the INVESTIGATION period where newspapers are going to be sent from).

    Also, the IP address of the syslog server must be in the interesting traffic.

    In other words, you should be able to PING from the ASA to syslog (through the tunnel) server.

    Federico.

  • LAN to lan vpn between ASA and router 7200

    Hi friends,

    I need to configure the lan to lan between ASA vpn (remote location) and router 7200 (on our network).

    <7200 router="" (ip="" add:="" 10.10.5.2)="">-(Internet) -<(IP add:="" 192.168.12.2)="" asa(5510)="">---192.135.5.0/24 network

    I will have the following configuration:

    7200 router:

    crypto ISAKMP policy 80

    the enc

    AUTH pre-shared

    Group 1

    life 3600

    ISAKMP crypto key cisco123 address 192.168.12.2

    Cryto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac VPNtrans

    map VPNTunnel 80 ipsec-isakmp crypto

    defined by peer 192.168.12.2

    game of transformation-VPNtrans

    match address 110

    int fa0/0

    IP add 10.10.5.2 255.255.255.192

    IP virtual-reassembly

    no ip route cache

    Speed 100

    full duplex

    card crypto VPNTunnel

    access-list 110 permit ip any 192.135.5.0 0.0.0.255

    ASA:

    int e0/0

    nameif inside

    security-level 100

    192.135.5.254 Add IP 255.255.255.0

    int e0/1

    nameif outside

    security-level 0

    IP add 192.168.12.2 255.255.255.240

    access-list ACL extended ip 192.135.5.0 allow 255.255.255.0 any

    Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0.0 192.168.12.3 1

    "pre-shared key auth" ISAKMP policy 10

    ISAKMP policy 10-enc

    ISAKMP policy 10 md5 hash

    10 1 ISAKMP policy group

    ISAKMP duration strategy of life 10-3600

    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac VPNtran

    card crypto VPN 10 matches the ACL address

    card crypto VPN 10 set peer 10.10.5.2

    card crypto VPN 10 the transform-set VPNtran value

    tunnel-group 10.10.5.2 type ipsec-l2l

    IPSec-attributes of type tunnel-group 10.10.5.2

    cisco123 pre-shared key

    card crypto VPN outside interface

    ISAKMP allows outside

    dhcpd address 192.135.5.1 - 192.135.5.250 inside

    dhcpd dns 172.15.4.5 172.15.4.6

    dhcpd wins 172.15.76.5 172.15.74.5

    dhcpd lease 14400

    dhcpd ping_timeout 500

    dhcpd allow inside

    Please check the configuration, please correct me if I missed something. I'm in a critical situation at the moment...

    Please advise...

    Thank you very much...

    Where it fails at the present time?

    Can you share out of after trying to establish the VPN tunnel:

    See the isa scream his

    See the ipsec scream his

    Please also run the following debug to see where it is a failure:

    debugging cry isa

    debugging ipsec cry

  • Private of IPSec VPN-private network between ASA and router

    Hello community,

    This is first time for me to configure IPSec VPN between ASA and router. I have an ASA 5540 at Headquarters and 877 router to EH Branch

    Headquarters ASA summary.

    Peer IP: 111.111.111.111

    Local network: 10.0.0.0

    Branch

    Peer IP: 123.123.123.123

    LAN: 192.168.1.0/24

    Please can someone help me set up the vpn.

    Hello

    This guide covers exactly what you need:

    Establishment of ASDM and SDM - http://www.netcraftsmen.net/resources/archived-articles/273.html

    Tunnel VPN - ASA to the router configuration:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps5855/products_configuration_example09186a0080a9a7a3.shtml#ASDM

    Kind regards

    Jimmy

  • ASA VPN with Fortgate

    Hello people!

    I still have the problem with VPN... Laughing out loud

    I have to create a new VPN site to site between ASA 5510 (8.42 IOS) and Fortgate, but something is very strange, Don t VPN came and I see in the debug crypto 10 ikev1 the newspaper to follow:

    [IKEv1] phase 1 default: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Gr OUP Description: RRs would be: Cfg 1 group would be: Group 2

    But if I ask the other peer to change in Group 2, the msg in the SAA is:

    [IKEv1] phase 1 default: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Gr OUP Description: RRs would be: Group 2 GCF: Group 1

    Fortgate is possible to activate the two specific groups of VPN 1 and 2, and I would ask the other peer left this way and the ASA show:

    [IKEv1] phase 1 default: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Gr OUP Description: RRs would be: Group 2 GCF: Group 1
    [IKEv1] phase 1 default: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Gr OUP Description: RRs would be: Cfg 1 group would be: Group 2

    The show isakmp his:

    9 counterpart IKE: 179.124.32.181
    Type: user role: answering machine
    Generate a new key: no State: MM_WAIT_MSG3

    I have delete and creat VPN 3 x and the same error occurs.

    Everyone has seen this kind of problem?

    Is it using Fortigate version 5 by chance?

    I saw Cisco ASA VPN problems repeatedly with this code Fortigate, but above all it has been a problem of Phase 2 and defining KB life maximally on the side of the ASA has solved it... However this seems not to be your problem here.

    The first thing in your config I see you have PFS enabled - have you insured it is located on the side of Fortinet or tried to turn it off on the side of Cisco to see if it happens?

    Be stuck at MM_WAIT_MSG3 means that you sent your return policy, but then you have not received the third package in the ISAKMP riding so either the Fortigate is unhappy with something or there's a routing problem (however unlikely given that you have already had communication)

    Try on the side of the ASA:

    debug crypto isakmp 7
    You can also confrm your external interface is 'outside1 '? You can see this "see intellectual property."
  • Device behind a Firewall other, ASA VPN

    I have a client who wants to put their VPN / behind the ASA ASA main connected to the Internet.  Both devices have an inside leg for the internal network, but the ASA VPN connects directly to the Internet ASA.

    Topology:

    Outisde FW: Internet transfer Procedure > ASA/FW > leg DMZ to ASA/VPN

    ASA VPN: Outside the L3 Interface interface DMZ of ASA/FW link

    On the outside NAT FW I would be the external address of the VPN / ASA outside the public IP address is available and I have a rule that allows all IP from outside to outside the private IP VPN.  Inside = 192.168.254.1 outside = public IP address.

    Configured on the VPN / ASA, ASA standard SSL Remote Access.

    When I hit the NAT public IP address, nothing happens.  I've run packet - trace on the FW outside, and everything seems good.

    Someone at - it a sampling plan / config for a similar topology?     Internet > ASA/FW > dmz-leg > ASA/VPN

    Thanks in advance,
    Bob

    Can share you your NAT and routing configuration? Of these two ASAs

  • Remote access VPN routing

    Hello

    I'm having a problem on the VPN routing.

    The VPN client is connected correctly to ASA5510, but cannot access inside ASA and the Internet or another network. What I want to achieve is.

    [email protected] / * / -> ASA5520 (public IP)-> Inside (172.16.1.0)

    The VPN address pool uses 172.168.10.0 (I also tried 172.16.1.100 - 120 with the same network from the inside).

    interface GigabitEthernet0/0

    nameif outside

    security-level 0

    IP address a.a.a.a 255.255.255.0

    !

    interface GigabitEthernet0/1

    nameif inside

    security-level 100

    IP 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0

    IP local pool vpnpool 192.168.10.1 - 192.168.10.254 mask 255.255.255.0

    access extensive list ip 172.16.1.0 inside_nat0_outbound allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0

    NAT (inside) 0-list of access inside_nat0_outbound

    NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0

    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac

    Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-MD5 esp-aes-256 esp-md5-hmac

    Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-SHA esp - esp-sha-hmac

    Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-MD5 esp - esp-md5-hmac

    Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-192-MD5 esp-aes-192 esp-md5-hmac

    Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5-esp-3des esp-md5-hmac

    Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA 256 - aes - esp esp-sha-hmac

    Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA aes - esp esp-sha-hmac

    Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-192-SHA esp-aes-192 esp-sha-hmac

    Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-MD5-esp - aes esp-md5-hmac

    life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800

    Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life - safety 4608000 association

    crypto dynamic-map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 pfs Group1 set

    Crypto dynamic-map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 value transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA ESP-AES-128-MD5 ESP-AES-192-SHA ESP-AES-192-MD5 ESP-AES-256-SHA ESP-AES-256-MD5 ESP-3DES-SHA MD5-ESP-3DES ESP-DES-SHA ESP-DES-MD5

    outside_map card crypto 65535-isakmp dynamic ipsec SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP

    outside_map interface card crypto outside

    crypto ISAKMP allow outside

    crypto ISAKMP policy 10

    preshared authentication

    3des encryption

    sha hash

    Group 2

    life 86400

    internal VPNstaff group strategy

    attributes of Group Policy VPNstaff

    4.2.2.2 DNS server value

    Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec

    type tunnel-group VPNstaff remote access

    attributes global-tunnel-group VPNstaff

    address vpnpool pool

    Group Policy - by default-VPNstaff

    IPSec-attributes tunnel-group VPNstaff

    pre-shared-key *.

    Hello

    A quick test, try this.

    -Turn on nat - t (if its disable)

    Command: crypto isakmp nat-traversal 20

    see if it helps.

    If not,

    -Run a continuous ping from the client to the ASA inside the interface, make sure that you run the command 'management-access to inside' before you start with the ping.

    -Time our RESPONSE ICMP or inside the interface... ?

    If time-out, then

    -Check the number of decrypts using the command "show crypto ipsec his"

    If ICMP response to inside interface is received by the VPN client.

    -Ping to an internal host behind the ASA.

    -"Show crypto ipsec his"

    IF you have received responses if first test then here you should see decrypts number increases.

    -Apply the catches on the inside of the interface

    You can consult the document below

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_tech_note09186a0080a9edd6.shtml

    -If you see the package source as VPN client interface to reach the inside interface for the destination of the host behind the ASA, then its a problem with your routing internal.

    In case you have an L3 device connected to the ASA inside the interface, make sure that you have a route for GW subnet 192.168.1.x as ASA inside the interface i.e. 172.16.1.1 score

    If his L2 or a dumb device, then as a quic test, make the following statement of the road using the command-line in windows on the host computer behind the asa participant in this test.

    route add 192.168.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0 172.16.1.1

    Please let me know if it helps.

    Concerning

    M

  • VPN routing clients

    I have an ASA 5510 with IPSec VPN installation. VPN clients receive 172.17.0.0 addresses and access to the 172.16.0.0 network (inside the interface the SAA is 172.16.1.1). I need these customers to achieve 172.20.0.0 via an internal router (172.16.3.7).

    How do I configure this? Currently the traffic sends just the 172.20.0.0 customer on its internet connection as split tunneling is enabled. I tried to use a static route on the client which did not work.

    Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.

    Rick

    you have a road to each 172.20.0.0 of the asa network via 172.16.3.7 bridge?

    I would check that.

    1 - asa, a route to reach net 172.20.0.0.

    2-If asa has a route, does 172.16.3.7 router knows how to get to your VPN to the pool?

    3-access list asa to allow/permit pool to the 172.20.0.0 network vpn network.

  • New ASA/VPN configuration

    So, I am looking to add one of my spare 5510 firewall to my secondary network as a vpn connection.

    All I want this new ASA to do is handle my site anyconnect VPN connections.  I'm pretty new to ASAs if any help would be great.  I know how to create a new access VPN on my ASA and I added a NAT for my inside and outside traffic to my new Pool of IP VPN.

    My question is, since it's only for the VPN and I want all my current internal traffic to continue to the asa 5510 existing routing, do I have to enter the ACL to my new single AAS of VPN?  ACLs are used for VPN traffic and do I need them to traffic the route via VPN?

    I'll put up inside interface of connection to one of my main Cisco switches and the outside interface connects to my DMZ switch on the new ASA only VPN.

    Thank you

    I don't know if I am how you connect to the external interface of single ASA VPN. Normally, in this type of installation, we would see the ASA VPN "in parallel" with the perimeter firewall.

    You mention the DMZ switch that threw me a little. If you are in France through your main firewall and go to single ASA VPN via the DMZ then Yes you will need to allow several open ports (protocol 50, udp/500, tcp/443 among others) and may have to do some other techniques (NAT - T, etc.) depending on the type of remote you are implementing. That's why we rarely see this configuration used - it adds a good dose of complexity without significant benefit.

    When the old facility is used, you need to switch internal to know to route traffic to the pool VPN through the only ASA VPN inside the interface. A static route is more often used, although you can use OSPF or EIGRP if you wanted to.

    Should generally not be any access list that VPN traffic around the Bank access lists incoming interface. Back to remote clients traffic is coming from inside and out through (and is usually part of anestablished connection) so no access list is necessary inside.

  • Tips to add a VPN router to my current network configuration

    Dear all

    My apologies if the answer to this question already exists, however, I searched in many situations and none seem to match what I'm after.

    I currently have an ISP modem/router in Bridge mode connected to a TC of Apple which is my wireless router, I have 2 Express airport connected to this acting as the extensors of the range.  I have a VPN service through the MyPrivate network I activate on the desired device when required and everything works fine.

    What I want to do now is to be able to use my AppleTV and burning Amazon via the VPN as well so you need to add a VPN router in the configuration.  I want to finish with 2 wireless networks running together for these devices who need VPN and those who are not.  I don't want to lose the opportunity to extend the network to express it however airport.

    If someone could explain to me if this is possible and if so how do I set up the network.

    Thanks in advance

    Mark

    Basically you would need a device that supports VPN-passthrough and VLANS for your goals of networking. MyPrivate network, seems to be a VPN SSL, which is a user-server configuration. In other words, you install a client VPN on your Mac and you connect to the VPN network MyPrivate server to establish a VPN tunnel.

    Networking two or more "separated", should be using a router that supports VLAN services. Each segment of VIRTUAL local area network, in essence, would be a separate, she either wired or wireless network or a combination of both. This would probably be the 'easiest' part for the installation program.

    Now how combining the two would be the question, and I don't know what would be the best way, or even if it is possible.

    A few thoughts:

    • Use a router that supports VLANS. Create at least two VIRTUAL LAN segments. One for Apple TV & Burns, one for Internet access in general. Connect the device to VPN client host on the first segment, and configure for Internet sharing.
    • Download a dedicated VPN network application that supports hosting of third-party VPN clients, like yours. You would still need a router that supports VLAN to provided separate network segments.
    • Hire a consultant network. Let them know what you the goals of networking and ask them to offer potential solutions.
  • QuickVPN - could not do a ping the remote VPN router!

    Hello

    I have a RV042 (VPN router) and I have some problems to run properly using the QuickVPN client.

    Here is the Log of the QuickVPN client.

    2008-10-15 20:14:38 [STATUS] a network interface detected with 192.168.0.104 IP address
    2008-10-15 20:14:38 [STATUS] connection...
    2008-10-15 20:14:38 [STATUS] connection to a remote gateway with IP address: 96.20.174.84
    2008-10-15 20:14:38 [WARNING] server certificate does not exist on your local computer.
    2008-10-15 20:14:44 remote gateway [STATE] has been reached with https...
    2008-10-15 20:14:44 [STATUS] commissioning...
    2008-10-15 20:14:51 [STATUS] Tunnel is connected successfully.
    2008-10-15 20:14:51 [STATUS] verification of network...
    2008-10-15 20:14:55 [WARNING] failed to do a ping the remote VPN router!
    2008-10-15 20:14:58 [WARNING] failed to do a ping the remote VPN router!
    2008-10-15 20:15:01 [WARNING] failed to do a ping the remote VPN router!
    2008-10-15 20:15:05 [WARNING] failed to do a ping the remote VPN router!
    2008-10-15 20:15:08 [WARNING] failed to do a ping the remote VPN router!
    2008-10-15 20:15:11 [WARNING] Ping has been blocked, which can be caused by an unexpected disconnection.
    2008-10-15 20:15:19 [STATUS] disconnection...
    2008-10-15 20:15:25 [STATUS] Tunnel is disconnected successfully.

    I don't know how it is implemented, but if WuickVPN wait a form ping my router, it will not happen. I was never able to ping my router ouside of my ISP network.

    There is a way to disable the Ping process and continue with the VPN connection?

    QuickVPN try ping on the router via the VPN tunnel to check the connection. It should work without worrying about whether your ISP filters ICMP messages or not. The tunnel is encrypted your ISP won't know what you're doing.

    Please post the corresponding on the RV042 VPN log. That is expected to see how far you get.

    You have a firewall running on the computer? I think that some firewalls have difficulty with the traffic of ESP.

    What is the router that is connected to the computer? How is it that is configured?

  • ASA VPN - allow user based on LDAP Group

    Hello friends

    I have create a configuration to allow connection based on LDAP Group.

    I m not specialize in the firewall and I tried to follow the links above, but both seem old, commanded several is not available.

    http://www.tunnelsup.com/Cisco-ASA-VPN-authorize-user-based-on-LDAP-group

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/ASA-5500-x-series-NEX...

    Anyone know how I can do?

    Thank you

    Marcio

    I like to use the Protocol DAP (dynamic access policies) to control this.  Follow this guide:

    https://supportforums.Cisco.com/document/7691/ASA-8X-dynamic-access-policies-DAP-deployment-guide

  • Assign the static IP address by ISE, ASA VPN clients

    We will integrate the remote access ASA VPN service with a new 1.2 ISE.

    Authentication is performed in Active directory. After authentication, can address assigned to a specific user of VPN by ISE IP?

    This means that the same VPN user will always get the same IP address. Thank you.

    Daniel,

    You can override the IETF-RADIUS-Framed-IP-Address in the authorization policy.

    However if I may make a suggestion:

    Unless you have only a handful of users to do so, it may be appropriate to assign the address of ISE pool or perform the mapping of LDAP attributes on ASA itself.

    In the latter case, the IP addresses are kept on the server as LDAP attributes and ASA will map the IP address. You don't want to keep address IP DB in several places.

    M.

  • ASDM conc (ASA) VPN access

    I have the script like this:

    an ASA, which is the FW, TR making static NAT from the public to the private IP and private IP address add is add conc (another ASA) VPN. I am accessing these devices via the VPN client and I get the address IP of VPN pool set on VPN conc. VPN conc. is in a DMZ VLAN, but it also has connection to the local network segment. Purposes of mgmt, I connect to this VPN through SSH conc via a switch in the local network segment. To use the http access, I have to be on one of the servers that are in the local network segment. Since then, when I set up the VPN connection, I'm sure VPN conc., what can do to access http directly from my PC?

    This sets up on the conc VPN:

    management-access inside

    After that you should be able to use ASDM over the VPN tunnel, by connecting to its inside ip address.

    hth
    Herbert
    (note, I assume the name of the interface connected to the LAN is named "inside", if not adapt at will )

  • Cisco IOS - access remote VPN - route unwanted problem

    Hello

    I recently ran into a problematic scenario: I am trying to connect to a remote LAN (using a Cisco VPN client on my windows xp machine) my office LAN and access a server there. The problem is that I need a remote local network access at the same time.

    Remote LAN: 172.16.0.0/16

    LAN office: 172.16.45.0/24

    Topology:

    (ME: 172.16.10.138/25) - (several subnets form 172.16.0.0/16) - (Internet cloud) - (VPN-Gateway) - (172.16.45.0/24) - (TARGET: 172.16.45.100)

    To provide access, I configured a VPN to access simple distance on a 1700 series router. It's the relevant part:

    (...)

    crypto ISAKMP client config group group-remote access

    my-key group

    VPN-address-pool

    ACL 100

    IP local pool pool of addresses-vpn - 172.16.55.1 172.16.55.30

    access-list 100 permit ip 172.16.45.100 host 172.16.55.0 0.0.0.31

    (...)

    The configuration works fine, I can access the 172.16.45.100 server every time I need to. However, the problem is that when the VPN connection is connected, Windows wants to somehow rout the packets intended for 172.16.0.0/16 through the VPN tunnel. This is apparently due to a static route that added by the Cisco VPN Client and all other specific VPN routes.

    I suspect that the culprit is the IP LOCAL POOL, since when the VPN is connected, debugging of Client VPN log shows something like "adapter connected, address 172.16.55.1/16. Focus on the part "/ 16". I checked the VPN status page and the only road indicated there was "172.16.45.100 255.255.255.255" under remote routes. Local routes was empty.

    Is this a known problem I missed the obvious solution for? Is there no workaround apart from the pool local vpn penetrating high-end 10.x.x.x or 192.168.x.x? Thank you in advance for advice or tips!

    Hello

    The best way is to avoid any overlap between the local network and VPN pool.

    Try 172.17.0.0/16, is also private IP address space:

    http://en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_network

    Please rate if this helped.

    Kind regards

    Daniel

Maybe you are looking for

  • Java support for iPad/iOS

    I know it's a long question/suggestion, but I wanted to give my use case. I have an iPad 2 Air right now, that I use for personal work content and limited content is mainly. I'm certainly interested to go to the Pro 12.9 inches because it has a lot m

  • Mobile Firefox crashes when opening multiple tabs on the s3 Galaxy

    Request, I open my Tumblr page and even a tab additional mobile Firefox dingle train and then eventually crashes on my T - Mobile Samsung Galaxy s3 running Jelly Bean. Only, I noticed the error when Tumblr is open. is there a specific conflict with t

  • OS update 10.11 El Capitan, causing the crash MacPro

    MacPro (mid-2010) 2.8 GHz Quad-Core with 32 GB of RAM ECC DDR3 and an OWC SSD 480 GB Accelsior, AMD Radeon HD 7950 graphics card. I tried to upgrade 10.10.5 to 10.11 three times with the same result - startup gets about 80% of fact and accidents with

  • corrupt datasocket instalation?

  • empty folder

    Hi experts Labview,. I noticed that my record of deletion function does not work correctly when the folder is not emptied. Can someone show me how to empty a folder or delete a folder with the files it contains?