New ASA/VPN configuration

Similar Questions

• ASA VPN configuration

  Hello

  I set up a VPN site-to site on a SAA, to the other site there is a Watchguard firewall.  The VPN has not been established. I have not implemented of isakmp and ipsec sessions. Here I have the config I use, anyone can see if I'm missing something, its my first VPN using the command line

  object-group network SITEA
  10.57.254.0 subnet 255.255.255.0

  object-group network SITEB
  OBJECT-NETWORK 10.254.10.0 255.255.255.0

  Crypto ikev1 allow outside

  VPN_TRAFFIC_ALLOWED list extended access allowed object-group ip SITEA SITEB object-group

  NAT (inside, outside) static source SITEA SITEB static destination SITEA SITEB

  tunnel-group X.X.X.X type ipsec-l2l
  tunnel-group ipsec-attributes X.X.X.X
  pre-shared key X.X.X.X
  output

  IKEv1 crypto policy 10
  preshared authentication
  AES 256 encryption
  sha hash
  lifetime 28800

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ikev1 TS-ESP-AES-SHA esp-aes-256 esp-sha-hmac

  crypto map outside_map 1 corresponds to the address VPN_TRAFFIC_ALLOWED
  card crypto outside_map 1 set of peer X.X.X.X
  card crypto outside_map 1 set transform-set TS-ESP-AES-SHA ikev1
  1 outside crypto map outside_map interface

  Hello.

  Please fix the NAT 0 with this line:

  nat source (indoor, outdoor) static SITEA SITEA SITEB SITEB static destination non-proxy-arp-route search

  If you're still having problems to send me the result of:

  entry Packet-trace within the icmp 10.57.254.10 8 10.254.10.10 detailed 0.

  Kind regards

• ASA 5500 x new anyconnect VPN license structure

  I wonder if anyone can give me some insight on the new ASA VPN (SSL VPN) structure of license.  Currently, I have anyconnect premium license installed on the ASA 5500 series but want to buy the same type of license for x ASA 5500 series.  I understand the premium license is required for SSL VPN and webvpn.  Can someone find out if the premium anyconnect and anyconnect essentials license has been replaced by the Cisco Anyconnect Apex licence?

  The new AnyConnect Apex maps old Premium licenses. They are now focused on the term (1, 3-5 years) and have been approved by a single user (regardless of the number of devices) vs. concurrent users on the old regime.

  Apex (or the old premium) is required for clientless SSL VPN. Regular-based on the SSL VPN client AnyConnect requires no Apex but can be done by using only more licenses.

  The new AnyConnect Plus is the old Essentials plus mobile licenses. There is an option of perpetual and based on the duration.

  By single user licensing is a terms and conditions / EULA stuff and not enforced by technical means at the moment.

• LDAP AAA for VPN configuration

  Preface: I'm all new to Cisco Configuration and learn as I go.

  I'm at the stage of configuration LDAP to configure a VPN on ASA 5520, software release 8.3 (1).  Previously the programme installation and RADIUS authentication successfully tested, I tried to use similar logic to implement the LDAP authentication/authorization.  I have acquired a service account that queries the pub for the identification of the registered user information.  My main resource was the following Manual: Cisco ASA 5500 Series Configuration Guide using the CLI Software Version 8.3.  I did initially configurations by using ASDM, but could not get tests to succeed.  So I amazed the ASDM configs and went to the CLI.  Here is the configuration.

  AAA-server AAA_LDAP protocol ldap
  AAA-server host 10,20,30,40 (inside) AAA_LDAP
  Server-port 636
  LDAP-base-dn domain.ad
  LDAP-scope subtree
  LDAP-naming-attribute uid
  LDAP-login-password 8 *.
  LDAP-connection-dn cn = commonname, OU = ou01, or = ou02, dc = domain, dc = ad
  enable LDAP over ssl
  microsoft server type
  LDAP-attribute-map LDAP_ATTRIB

  ---

  type tunnel-group ASA_DEFAULT remote access
  attributes global-tunnel-group ASA_DEFAULT
  authorization-server-group AAA_LDAP

  ---

  LDAP attribute-map LDAP_ATTRIB
  name of the MemberOf IETF Radius-class card
  map-value MemberOf "VPN users' asa_default

  ---

  I tested all the naming-attribute ldap alternatives listed with the same results.

  When I test the authentication using this configuration, I get the following error: ERROR: authentication server does not: AAA Server has been deleted

  When I test authorization using this Setup, I get the same error (except for the word permission instead of authentication).

  I am at a total loss.  Any help would be appreciated.

  I would use ldp.exe to see if you can make sure that the sytnax of your ldap-connection-dn is just as you have in your config, it really helps just copy and paste.

  The problem I see is the following:

  [210] link as st_domadm
  [210] authentication Simple running to st_domadm to 10.20.30.30
  [210] simple authentication for st_domadm returned credenti invalid code (49) als
  [210] impossible to link the administrator returned code-(1) can't contact LDAP er

  I suppose your ldap-connection-dn is st_domadm and you try to test with the administrator account?

  Thank you

  Tarik

• Issue of ASA vpn site to site isakmp

  Hello

  He has been asked to configure on ASA a new vpn site-to-site. For that vpn should I put:

  crypto isakmp identity address
  crypto ISAKMP allow outside

  .. the configuration of my identity crypto isakmp is automatic and isakmp crypto is not enabled on any interface. I love vpn with ike enabled on the external interface. My question is: why should I enable isakmp on the external interface and especially can create disturbances to ike vpn that are already in place?

  By elsewhere-group or tunnel-group strategy, it was me asked to set up, the two do not have indication of ike. Never seen this kind of configuration before vpn, something new.

  Thank you

  Hi, Giuseppe.

  The crypto isakmp command activate outside changed ikev1 crypto Enable outside in the new ASA versions you need not enable this.

  There is also no need configure isakmp crypto identity address such that it is set to auto.

  This command indicates that the tunnel would be negotiated on the basis of the IP address but since it is set to auto it on it own will therefore not need to specify this command.

  Yes, you can create a new group policy group for this new tunnel and tunnel and there should be no impact on other tunnels of work.

  Kind regards

  Aditya

  Please evaluate the useful messages and mark the correct answers.

• ASA: VPN IPSEC Tunnel from 5505(ver=8.47) to 5512 (ver = 9.23)

  Hi-

  We have connected tunnel / VPN configuration between an ASA 5505 - worm = 8.4 (7) and 5512 - worm = 9.2 (3).
  We can only ping in a sense - 5505 to the 5512, but not of vice-versa(5512 to 5505).

  Networks:

  Local: 192.168.1.0 (answering machine)
  Distance: 192.168.54.0 (initiator)

  See details below on our config:

  SH run card cry

  card crypto outside_map 2 match address outside_cryptomap_ibfw
  card crypto outside_map 2 pfs set group5
  outside_map 2 peer XX crypto card game. XX.XXX.XXX
  card crypto outside_map 2 set transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA ikev1
  crypto map outside_map 2 set ikev2 AES256 ipsec-proposal

  outside_map interface card crypto outside

  Note:
  Getting to hit numbers below on rules/ACL...

  SH-access list. I have 54.0

  permit for access list 6 outside_access_out line scope ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.54.0 255.255.255.0 (hitcnt = 15931) 0x01aecbcc
  permit for access list 1 outside_cryptomap_ibfw line extended ip object NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.1.0_24 object NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.54.0_24 (hitcnt = 3) 0xa75f0671
  access-list 1 permit line outside_cryptomap_ibfw extended ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.54.0 255.255.255.0 (hitcnt = 3) 0xa75f0671

  SH run | I have access-group
  Access-group outside_access_out outside interface

  NOTE:
  WE have another working on the 5512 - VPN tunnel we use IKE peer #2 below (in BOLD)...

  HS cry his ikev1

  IKEv1 SAs:

  HIS active: 2
  Generate a new key SA: 0 (a tunnel report Active 1 and 1 to generate a new key during the generate a new key)
  Total SA IKE: 2

  1 peer IKE: XX. XX.XXX.XXX
  Type: L2L role: answering machine
  Generate a new key: no State: MM_ACTIVE
  2 IKE peers: XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
  Type: L2L role: answering machine
  Generate a new key: no State: MM_ACTIVE

  SH run tunnel-group XX. XX.XXX.XXX
  tunnel-group XX. XX.XXX.XXX type ipsec-l2l
  tunnel-group XX. XX.XXX.XXX General-attributes
  Group - default policy - GroupPolicy_XX.XXX.XXX.XXX
  tunnel-group XX. XX.XXX.XXX ipsec-attributes
  IKEv1 pre-shared-key *.
  remote control-IKEv2 pre-shared-key authentication *.

  SH run | I have political ikev1

  ikev1 160 crypto policy
  preshared authentication
  aes-256 encryption
  Group 5
  life 86400

  SH run | I Dynamics
  NAT interface dynamic obj - 0.0.0.0 source (indoor, outdoor)
  NAT source auto after (indoor, outdoor) dynamic one interface

  NOTE:
  To from 5512 at 5505-, we can ping a host on the remote network of ASA local

  # ping inside the 192.168.54.20
  Type to abort escape sequence.
  Send 5, echoes ICMP 100 bytes to 192.168.54.20, wait time is 2 seconds:
  !!!!!
  Success rate is 100 per cent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 30/32/40 ms

  Determination of 192.168.1.79 - local host route to 192.168.54.20 - remote host - derivation tunnel?

  The IPSEC tunnel check - seems OK?

  SH crypto ipsec his
  Interface: outside
  Tag crypto map: outside_map, seq num: 2, local addr: XX.XXX.XXX.XXX

  outside_cryptomap_ibfw to access ip 192.168.1.0 scope list allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.54.0 255.255.255.0
  local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
  Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (192.168.54.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
  current_peer: XX. XX.XXX.XXX

  #pkts program: 4609, #pkts encrypt: 4609, #pkts digest: 4609
  #pkts decaps: 3851, #pkts decrypt: 3851, #pkts check: 3851
  compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0
  #pkts uncompressed: 4609, model of #pkts failed: 0, #pkts Dang failed: 0
  success #frag before: 0, failures before #frag: 0, #fragments created: 0
  Sent #PMTUs: 0, #PMTUs rcvd: 0, reassembly: 20th century / of frgs #decapsulated: 0
  #TFC rcvd: 0, #TFC sent: 0
  #Valid errors ICMP rcvd: 0, #Invalid ICMP errors received: 0
  #send errors: 0, #recv errors: 0

  local crypto endpt. : XX.XXX.XXX.XXX/0, remote Start crypto. : XX. XX.XXX.XXX/0
  Path mtu 1500, ipsec 74 (44) generals, media, mtu 1500
  PMTU time remaining: 0, political of DF: copy / df
  Validation of ICMP error: disabled, TFC packets: disabled
  current outbound SPI: CDC99C9F
  current inbound SPI: 06821CBB

  SAS of the esp on arrival:
  SPI: 0x06821CBB (109190331)
  transform: aes-256-esp esp-sha-hmac no compression
  running parameters = {L2L, Tunnel, group 5 PFS, IKEv1}
  slot: 0, id_conn: 339968, crypto-card: outside_map
  calendar of his: service life remaining (KB/s) key: (3914789/25743)
  Size IV: 16 bytes
  support for replay detection: Y
  Anti-replay bitmap:
  0xFFFFFFFF to 0xFFFFFFFF
  outgoing esp sas:
  SPI: 0xCDC99C9F (3452542111)
  transform: aes-256-esp esp-sha-hmac no compression
  running parameters = {L2L, Tunnel, group 5 PFS, IKEv1}
  slot: 0, id_conn: 339968, crypto-card: outside_map
  calendar of his: service life remaining (KB/s) key: (3913553/25743)
  Size IV: 16 bytes
  support for replay detection: Y
  Anti-replay bitmap:
  0x00000000 0x00000001

  --> The local ASA 5512 - where we have questions - tried Packet Tracer... seems we receive requests/responses...

  SH cap CAP

  34 packets captured

  1: 16:41:08.120477 192.168.1.79 > 192.168.54.20: icmp: echo request
  2: 16:41:08.278138 192.168.54.20 > 192.168.1.79: icmp: echo request
  3: 16:41:08.278427 192.168.1.79 > 192.168.54.20: icmp: echo reply
  4: 16:41:09.291992 192.168.54.20 > 192.168.1.79: icmp: echo request
  5: 16:41:09.292282 192.168.1.79 > 192.168.54.20: icmp: echo reply

  --> On the ASA 5505 distance - we can ping through the 5512 to the local host (192.168.1.79)

  SH cap A2

  42 packets captured

  1: 16:56:16.136559 802. 1 q vlan P0 192.168.54.20 #1 > 192.168.1.79: icmp: echo request
  2: 16:56:16.168860 802. 1 q vlan P0 192.168.1.79 #1 > 192.168.54.20: icmp: echo reply
  3: 16:56:17.140434 802. 1 q vlan P0 192.168.54.20 #1 > 192.168.1.79: icmp: echo request
  4: 16:56:17.171652 802. 1 q vlan P0 192.168.1.79 #1 > 192.168.54.20: icmp: echo reply
  5: 16:56:18.154426 802. 1 q vlan P0 192.168.54.20 #1 > 192.168.1.79: icmp: echo request
  6: 16:56:18.186178 802. 1 q vlan P0 192.168.1.79 #1 > 192.168.54.20: icmp: echo reply
  7: 16:56:19.168417 802. 1 q vlan P0 192.168.54.20 #1 > 192.168.1.79: icmp: echo request

  --> Package trace on 5512 does no problem... but we cannot ping from host to host?

  entry Packet-trace within the icmp 192.168.1.79 8 0 detailed 192.168.54.20

  Phase: 4
  Type: CONN-SETTINGS
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  class-map default class
  match any
  Policy-map global_policy
  class class by default
  Decrement-ttl connection set
  global service-policy global_policy
  Additional information:
  Direct flow from returns search rule:
  ID = 0x7fffa2d0ba90, priority = 7, area = conn-set, deny = false
  hits = 4417526, user_data = 0x7fffa2d09040, cs_id = 0 x 0, use_real_addr, flags = 0 x 0 = 0 protocol
  IP/ID=0.0.0.0 SRC, mask = 0.0.0.0, port = 0, = 0 tag
  IP/ID=0.0.0.0 DST, mask is 0.0.0.0, port = 0, tag = 0, dscp = 0 x 0
  input_ifc = output_ifc = any to inside,

  Phase: 5
  Type: NAT
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  NAT interface dynamic obj - 0.0.0.0 source (indoor, outdoor)
  Additional information:
  Definition of dynamic 192.168.1.79/0 to XX.XXX.XXX.XXX/43904
  Direct flow from returns search rule:
  ID = 0x7fffa222d130, priority = 6, area = nat, deny = false
  hits = 4341877, user_data = 0x7fffa222b970, cs_id = 0 x 0, flags = 0 x 0 = 0 protocol
  IP/ID=0.0.0.0 SRC, mask = 0.0.0.0, port = 0, = 0 tag
  IP/ID=0.0.0.0 DST, mask is 0.0.0.0, port = 0, tag = 0, dscp = 0 x 0
  input_ifc = inside, outside = output_ifc

  ...

  Phase: 14
  Type: CREATING STREAMS
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:
  New workflow created with the 7422689 id, package sent to the next module
  Information module for forward flow...
  snp_fp_tracer_drop
  snp_fp_inspect_ip_options
  snp_fp_inspect_icmp
  snp_fp_translate
  snp_fp_adjacency
  snp_fp_fragment
  snp_ifc_stat

  Information for reverse flow...
  snp_fp_tracer_drop
  snp_fp_inspect_ip_options
  snp_fp_translate
  snp_fp_inspect_icmp
  snp_fp_adjacency
  snp_fp_fragment
  snp_ifc_stat

  Result:
  input interface: inside
  entry status: to the top
  entry-line-status: to the top
  output interface: outside
  the status of the output: to the top
  output-line-status: to the top
  Action: allow

  --> On remote ASA 5505 - Packet track is good and we can ping remote host very well... dunno why he "of Nations United-NAT?

  Destination - initiator:
   
  entry Packet-trace within the icmp 192.168.54.20 8 0 detailed 192.168.1.79
   
  ...
  Phase: 4
  Type: UN - NAT
  Subtype: static
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  NAT (inside, outside) static source NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.54.0_24 NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.54.0_24 NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.1.0_24 NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.1.0_24 non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination
  Additional information:
  NAT divert on exit to the outside interface
  Untranslate 192.168.1.79/0 to 192.168.1.79/0
  ...

  Summary:
  We "don't" ping from a host (192,168.1.79) on 5512 - within the network of the 5505 - inside the network host (192.168.54.20).
  But we can ping the 5505 - inside the network host (192.168.54.20) 5512 - inside the network host (192.168.1.79).

  Please let us know what other details we can provide to help solve, thanks for any help in advance.

  -SP

  Well, I think it is a NAT ordering the issue.

  Basically as static and this NAT rule-

  NAT interface dynamic obj - 0.0.0.0 source (indoor, outdoor)

  are both in article 1 and in this article, it is done on the order of the rules so it does match the dynamic NAT rule rather than static because that seems to be higher in the order.

  To check just run a 'sh nat"and this will show you what order everthing is in.

  The ASA is working its way through the sections.

  You also have this-

  NAT source auto after (indoor, outdoor) dynamic one interface

  which does the same thing as first statement but is in section 3, it is never used.

  If you do one of two things-

  (1) configure the static NAT statement is above the dynamic NAT in section 1 that is to say. You can specify the command line

  or

  (2) remove the dynamic NAT of section 1 and then your ASA will use the entry in section 3.

  There is a very good document on this site for NAT and it is recommended to use section 3 for your general purpose NAT dynamic due precisely these questions.

  It is interesting on your ASA 5505 you duplicated your instructions of dynamic NAT again but this time with article 2 and the instructions in section 3 that is why your static NAT works because he's put in correspondence before all your dynamic rules.

  The only thing I'm not sure of is you remove the dynamic NAT statement in article 1 and rely on the statement in section 3, if she tears the current connections (sorry can't remember).

  Then you can simply try to rearrange so your static NAT is above it just to see if it works.

  Just in case you want to see the document here is the link-

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/document/132066/ASA-NAT-83-NAT-operation-and-configuration-format-CLI

  Jon

• ASA VPN with ISE and different backends WBS for authentication

  Hello

  I have an AAA-problem I hope to have a few problems help.

  The problem ultimately is: how the ASA via ISE send Radius Access requests to different given OTP backends provided a connection to a certain group of Tunnel.

  BACKGROUND:

  I'll try to give you a brief picture of the scenario, this is what I currently have.

  A VPN system (ASA 8.4 (4)) where I let my users to choose among 3 different methods of authentication being

  (1) certificate (on chip card)

  (2) token - token of the OTP (One Time Password provided via the smartphone application: using pledge of Nordic OTP-Edge transport server)

  (3) SMS - OTP token (Nordic OTP - Edge transport server SMS OTP)

  The choice corresponds to different groups of profiles/Tunnel connection.

  Today, all authentication requests go directly to the OTP server and authorization goes directly to the AD via LDAP.

  THE PROBLEM:

  The problem occurs when I try to put in the ISE in the mixture.

  What I obviously (?) would like to do is have all the network authentication/authorization to go through my ISE platform to take advantage of a centralized administration, monitoring etc.

  Again I would need to use data bases different backend such as AD and Nordic OTP - Edge server, but then mandated by ISE.

  For me to be able to know what back-end AAA to the proxy system, to somehow be able to distinguish the incoming Radius Access-requests.

  WHAT WE CALL:

  At the time of the ASA 8.4.3 Radius access request contains 2 new attributes, the name of Group of Tunnel and the Type of customer, when a VPN user connects.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa84/configuration/guide/ref_extserver.html#wp1802187

  QUESTION:

  The seams, that I can achieve what I want by looking at the access request attribute Radius "Tunnel Group Name" and forward my request to different backends OTP for the authentication part therefore in theory. But, how do I actually go ahead and set that up in ISE?

  I don't see this attribute when I look at the details of Radius Authentication for an authentication AAA of the ASA at the ISE.

  Best regards

  / Mattias

  I think you can hit the following problem:

  CSCtz49846: ISE does not match the condition with VPN 146 Tunnel-Group-Name attribute

  This issue is not specific to this attribute, as shown in the solution shown in the accompanying note

  Workaround

  Ensure that the attribute name does not include a '.' character. This also applies to some of the existing attributes in the dictionary of Cisco-VPN300. Attribute names should be changed so that they do not include a "." character.

• l2l ASA vpn issues

  Hi all

  I have two firewalls that I'm trying to implement VPNs l2l between them. Once of them is an old wall of sonic and the other 5505.

  I put in all and ends the phase 1/2 and the tunnel rises however no traffic passes through

  Here is my configuration

  ASA (outside, 192.168.30.1) asa internal 192.168.10.0/25

  (Outside 192.168.30.2) SonicWALL sonicwall 192.168.20.0/24

  I have an accesslist that is configured on the asa and applied to the cypto card using card crypto XXXX 1, atch address YYY

  However when I watch the news ebugging on the console it says: "cannot locate the output for UDP of XXXX interface: 192.168.10.10/1 to 192.178.20.1/0.

  any ideas why this is?

  I just need a static route to say all traffic on asa with 192 source... 10.0 should go through 192.168.30.2?

  I guess it's the work of crypto card

  Am I wrong?

  Hello

  Begins to seems to me you have a filter ACL configured for your L2L VPN VPN and also the ACL filter of VPN and Crypto ACLs are the same things, which means you use a simple both ACL.

  Why I think it's like this is the fact that you say that your VPN L2L cross trading in the "packet-tracer" VPN Phase means Crypto VPN L2L ACL was correct. At the same time say you that the connection was stopped to the Phase of the VPN USER. He points to a VPN filter ACL being configured.

  In view of the foregoing, I also know that the ACL of filter for the L2L VPN behave with a logic different than typical ACL interface. In VPN L2L the ACL filter ALWAYS mention the remote network as the source ALWAYS and your Local network as the destination.

  If add you an ACL rule with order switched networks appears this fixes the VPN filter ACL problems and finally allowed traffic. Naturally I can only guess that I saw actual configurations at this point (which, usually with release "packet - trace", help to solve a problem faster just guessing)

  If you indeed filter VPN, you may be able to track him down with the following commands

  See the tunnel-group race

  Check if a "group policy" is defined then the command

  See establishing group policy enforcement

  This output should list the name of the ACL filter VPN if its game

  Regarding the installantion auto road. The default setting for ASA, is that it will create NO static routes automatically depending on the VPN configurations. This must be enabled manually in "crypto map" configurations, or you can configure static routes manually.

  ASA tracking to default TCP and UDP connections. ICMP is inspected only if his permit. By default, it is NOT inspected.

  Hope this helps

  Remember to mark a reply as the answer if it answered your question.

  Feel free to ask more if necessary.

  -Jouni

• Can I run an ASA VPN dedicated?

  I currently have a 5525 ASA that I use for general purposes of firewall.  This includes mainly the Nat'ed surfing and some translations static address for some servers such as mail and so on.  I realized that it is only a year old, is running well and I am reluctant to change the config and add features to it.  I have a new 5525 to be used as a replacement, but also via Anyconnect VPN.  I have several unused public IPs from my ISP, and there is a switch between the router of the provider and my ASA current.  Could I let just the current firewall to do its work and put the new in place by using a different ip address on the inside and the outside and connect it to the switch between the router and my main ASA?  This we would tweek the VPN without endangering the work of the company's main production.

  Thanks in advance for your help

  Hi Brad,

  Yes you can do it.

  It should work fine, as the new ASA would serve as the endpoint Anyconnect which seems fine and the ASA old would still serve the NATTING and static translations for your internal servers.

  Kind regards

  Aditya

  Please evaluate the useful messages and mark the correct answers.

• ASA VPN with Fortgate

  Hello people!

  I still have the problem with VPN... Laughing out loud

  I have to create a new VPN site to site between ASA 5510 (8.42 IOS) and Fortgate, but something is very strange, Don t VPN came and I see in the debug crypto 10 ikev1 the newspaper to follow:

  [IKEv1] phase 1 default: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Gr OUP Description: RRs would be: Cfg 1 group would be: Group 2

  But if I ask the other peer to change in Group 2, the msg in the SAA is:

  [IKEv1] phase 1 default: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Gr OUP Description: RRs would be: Group 2 GCF: Group 1

  Fortgate is possible to activate the two specific groups of VPN 1 and 2, and I would ask the other peer left this way and the ASA show:

  [IKEv1] phase 1 default: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Gr OUP Description: RRs would be: Group 2 GCF: Group 1
  [IKEv1] phase 1 default: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Gr OUP Description: RRs would be: Cfg 1 group would be: Group 2

  The show isakmp his:

  9 counterpart IKE: 179.124.32.181
  Type: user role: answering machine
  Generate a new key: no State: MM_WAIT_MSG3

  I have delete and creat VPN 3 x and the same error occurs.

  Everyone has seen this kind of problem?

  Is it using Fortigate version 5 by chance?

  I saw Cisco ASA VPN problems repeatedly with this code Fortigate, but above all it has been a problem of Phase 2 and defining KB life maximally on the side of the ASA has solved it... However this seems not to be your problem here.

  The first thing in your config I see you have PFS enabled - have you insured it is located on the side of Fortinet or tried to turn it off on the side of Cisco to see if it happens?

  Be stuck at MM_WAIT_MSG3 means that you sent your return policy, but then you have not received the third package in the ISAKMP riding so either the Fortigate is unhappy with something or there's a routing problem (however unlikely given that you have already had communication)

  Try on the side of the ASA:

  debug crypto isakmp 7

  You can also confrm your external interface is 'outside1 '? You can see this "see intellectual property."

• ASA VPN - allow user based on LDAP Group

  Hello friends

  I have create a configuration to allow connection based on LDAP Group.

  I m not specialize in the firewall and I tried to follow the links above, but both seem old, commanded several is not available.

  http://www.tunnelsup.com/Cisco-ASA-VPN-authorize-user-based-on-LDAP-group

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/ASA-5500-x-series-NEX...

  Anyone know how I can do?

  Thank you

  Marcio

  I like to use the Protocol DAP (dynamic access policies) to control this.  Follow this guide:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/document/7691/ASA-8X-dynamic-access-policies-DAP-deployment-guide

• Data capture ASA VPN

  Hello

  We have an asa 5585 on the network and it is configured for remote access VPN with RSA.

  When a VPN user connects to their VPN, he is invited for a PIN followed their secure ID token code.

  We want to simplify our VPN configuration if we starting from a perspective of support and management, users use a hard chips. Currently, many lose their chips or have a connection problem, so I would like to know what simple VPN solution, we have in place.

  Then is it possible on the ASA when I check my VPN traffic to determine what users are using the VPN for, since the purpose is if they only use it for email, so we can advise them to use webmail rather and can disable VPN access.

  With respect to the VPN, I see only two options; you either empty tokens to make life easier or you keep them and put up with it.

• Assign the static IP address by ISE, ASA VPN clients

  We will integrate the remote access ASA VPN service with a new 1.2 ISE.

  Authentication is performed in Active directory. After authentication, can address assigned to a specific user of VPN by ISE IP?

  This means that the same VPN user will always get the same IP address. Thank you.

  Daniel,

  You can override the IETF-RADIUS-Framed-IP-Address in the authorization policy.

  However if I may make a suggestion:

  Unless you have only a handful of users to do so, it may be appropriate to assign the address of ISE pool or perform the mapping of LDAP attributes on ASA itself.

  In the latter case, the IP addresses are kept on the server as LDAP attributes and ASA will map the IP address. You don't want to keep address IP DB in several places.

  M.

• the Cisco asa vpn processing error payload: payload ID: 1

  Hello

  I set up vpn L2TP by using ASDM and now I am not able to connect my Cisco ASA 5505.

  It is showing the error message

  3

  July 7, 2011

  18:57:38

  IP = *. *. *. *, payload processing error: ID payload: 1

  Please suggest me how to solve this problem (by using ASDM)

  Thank you

  Hi Nikhil,

  Your config seems incomplete, command 'IPSec l2tp ipsec vpn-tunnel-Protocol' is missing, what is needed to connect L2tp try to reconfigure your firewall using the link:-

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/customer/docs/security/ASA/asa80/configuration/guide/l2tp_ips.html

  Hope this helps,

  Parminder Sian

• Device behind a Firewall other, ASA VPN

  I have a client who wants to put their VPN / behind the ASA ASA main connected to the Internet.  Both devices have an inside leg for the internal network, but the ASA VPN connects directly to the Internet ASA.

  Topology:

  Outisde FW: Internet transfer Procedure > ASA/FW > leg DMZ to ASA/VPN

  ASA VPN: Outside the L3 Interface interface DMZ of ASA/FW link

  On the outside NAT FW I would be the external address of the VPN / ASA outside the public IP address is available and I have a rule that allows all IP from outside to outside the private IP VPN.  Inside = 192.168.254.1 outside = public IP address.

  Configured on the VPN / ASA, ASA standard SSL Remote Access.

  When I hit the NAT public IP address, nothing happens.  I've run packet - trace on the FW outside, and everything seems good.

  Someone at - it a sampling plan / config for a similar topology?     Internet > ASA/FW > dmz-leg > ASA/VPN

  Thanks in advance,
  Bob

  Can share you your NAT and routing configuration? Of these two ASAs