Ask in analytic function
HelloI use under request
Select * from
(
SELECT FLAG, S_DATE, ROW_NUMBER () OVER (PARTITION OF)
order by S_DATE, FLAG flag) d
Table_name FROM
ORDER BY S_DATE
);
below the output which gives
Flag | S_DATE | D
Y | 27/02/2012 05:33 | 1
Y | 27/02/2012 05:34 | 2
Y | 27/02/2012 05:34 | 3
N | 27/02/2012 05:34 | 1
N | 27/02/2012 05:34 | 2
N | 27/02/2012 05:34 | 3
N | 27/02/2012 05:35 | 4
N | 27/02/2012 05:35 | 5
Y | 27/02/2012 05:36 | 4
Y | 27/02/2012 05:36 | 5
Y | 27/02/2012 05:36 | 6
But I want the output to be below order is changed in the last 3 rows
Flag | S_DATE | D
Y | 27/02/2012 05:33 | 1
Y | 27/02/2012 05:34 | 2
Y | 27/02/2012 05:34 | 3
N | 27/02/2012 05:34 | 1
N | 27/02/2012 05:34 | 2
N | 27/02/2012 05:34 | 3
N | 27/02/2012 05:35 | 4
N | 27/02/2012 05:35 | 5
Y | 27/02/2012 05:36 | 1
Y | 27/02/2012 05:36 | 2
Y | 27/02/2012 05:36 | 3
I used the analytical function.
Published by: user8858890 on February 27, 2012 02:00
Hello
user8858890 wrote:
... But I want the output to be below order is changed in the last 3 rowsFlag | S_DATE | D
Y | 27/02/2012 05:33 | 1
Y | 27/02/2012 05:34 | 2
Y | 27/02/2012 05:34 | 3
N | 27/02/2012 05:34 | 1
N | 27/02/2012 05:34 | 2
N | 27/02/2012 05:34 | 3
N | 27/02/2012 05:35 | 4
N | 27/02/2012 05:35 | 5
Y | 27/02/2012 05:36 | 1
Y | 27/02/2012 05:36 | 2
Y | 27/02/2012 05:36 | 3
Why do you want the last 3 lines (who have the flag = 'Y') to be numbered 1, 2, 3, when the first 3 lines (who also have the flag = "Y") already have the numbers 1, 2 and 3? Do you want a separate whenevever #1 there is a group of consecutive lines (when ordered by s_date) who have the same flag? If so, you need to identify the groups, like this:
WITH got_grp_id AS
(
SELECT flag
, s_date
, ROWID AS r_id
, ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( ORDER BY s_date
, ROWID
)
- ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( PARTITION BY flag
ORDER BY s_date
, ROWID
) AS grp_id
FROM table_name
)
SELECT flag
, s_date
, ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( PARTITION BY flag
, grp_id
ORDER BY s_date
, r_id
) AS d
FROM got_grp_id
ORDER BY s_date
, grp_id
, d
;
This assumes that each line can be unique idendified, so that the order is unambiguous. In your sample data, there is completely identical lines, so I used the ROWID to uniquely identify the lines. Using ROWID suppose table_name is a real table, not just a game of results.
I hope that answers your question.
If not, post a small example of data (CREATE TABLE and only relevant columns, INSERT statements) for all of the tables involved and the results desired from these data.
Explain, using specific examples, how you get these results from these data.
Always tell what version of Oracle you are using.
Tags: Database
Similar Questions
-
Hi gurus,
I ask someone to enlighten me on the analytical functions.
I used the following query:
The sample result set is:select * from (select filename,count(regexp_substr(filename,'.*era'))over( partition by regexp_substr(filename,'.*era') ) cnt FROM l_x12n_835_fileinfo where partitionnum=76000 and clntsysnum=76500 and radt>='01-JAN-2010') where cnt>1
Now, I changed the query to:FILENAME CNT rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.072.era 4 rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.072.era.1 4 rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.072.era.2 4 rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.072.era.3 4 rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.081.era 3 rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.081.era.1 3 rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.081.era.2 3 rsmedcalwa.20100106.chpwr.088.era 3 rsmedcalwa.20100106.chpwr.088.era.1 3 rsmedcalwa.20100106.chpwr.088.era.2 3 rsmedcalwa.20100108.chppr.363.era.3 4 rsmedcalwa.20100108.chppr.363.era.1 4 rsmedcalwa.20100108.chppr.363.era.2 4 rsmedcalwa.20100108.chppr.363.era 4
The result set has beenselect * from (select filename,count(regexp_substr(filename,'.*era'))over( partition by regexp_substr(filename,'.*era') order by filename ) cnt FROM l_x12n_835_fileinfo where partitionnum=76000 and clntsysnum=76500 and radt>='01-JAN-2010') where cnt>1
(1) I don't understand how the addition of the order by clause changes the count. Could someone explain please?FILENAME CNT rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.072.era.1 2 rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.072.era.2 3 rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.072.era.3 4 rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.081.era.1 2 rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.081.era.2 3 rsmedcalwa.20100106.chpwr.088.era.1 2 rsmedcalwa.20100106.chpwr.088.era.2 3 rsmedcalwa.20100108.chppr.363.era.1 2 rsmedcalwa.20100108.chppr.363.era.2 3 rsmedcalwa.20100108.chppr.363.era.3 4 rsmedcalwa.20100112.chpwr.175.era.1 2 rsmedcalwa.20100112.chpwr.175.era.2 3
When I change this order by order of regexp_substr(filename,'.*era'), it gives me the correct number.
My requirement is to check how many similar file names I.
(2) if there are any other better elsewhere, please let me know.Hello
Analytical functions still carried on in a window of the the result set, which can be smaller than the result set.
If you have a PARTITION BY clause, the window for each row includes rows with the same values from all the PARTITION BY expressions.
If you have an ORDER BY clause, the window includes that of a section of consecutive lines in the score, as defined by a windowing clause (in other words, LINES or KEEP them). The default value is "RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND LINE CURRENT.In your case, if the analytical clause is:
over( partition by regexp_substr(filename,'.*era') )
and the line you are looking at a filename = 'rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.072.era.2', the window takes up the entire partition, in other words, all lines whose name includes "rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.072.era". In other words, the window is identical to the partition, because theree is no ORDER BY clause.
But if you add an ORDER BY clause:
over( partition by regexp_substr(filename,'.*era') order by filename )
then the window (potentially) decreases. Since there is no clause window, the default value 'RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECDING AND a CURRENT LINE' is used, which means that only the lines with a lower or equal to "rsmedcalwa.20100105.chpwr.072.era.2" file name (using the normal string comparison) will affect the results.
The analytical ORDER BY clause is required for certain features (such as ROW_NUMBER) significance only in regard to certain commands. For the most part fucntions (including COUNTY), the ORDER BY clause is optional, and you do not have to use a. In this case, it seems that you do not want the effect of a smaller than the partition window, just so, do not use an ORDER byclause of Analytics for this function.
Remember, the analytical ORDER byclause is completely independent the ORDER BY query clause. If you want the result presented in a certain order, use an ORDER BY clause at the end of the query. It will not change the results of the analytical functions.
-
analytical function and the aggregate function
What are the analytical function and the aggregate function. What is the difference between them?Hello
Analytic Functions : -.
Analytical functions calculate a value of aggregation based on a group of lines. They differ from aggregate functions because they return several rows for each group. The Group of rows is called a window and is defined by the analytic_clause. For each line, a sliding window of lines is defined. The window determines the range of lines used for the calculations for the current line. Window sizes can be based on a physical number of rows or a logic as the time interval.
Analytical functions are the last set of operations performed in a query with the exception of the last ORDER BY clause. Every joint and every WHERE, GROUP BY and HAVING clauses are met before the analytical functions are handled. As a result, analytic functions can only appear in the select list or the ORDER BY clause.
Analytical functions are commonly used to calculate cumulative aggregates, moving, centered and considered.Aggregate functions : -.
Aggregate functions return a line of single result based on the groups of lines, rather than on the unique lines. Aggregate functions can appear in selection lists, as well as in the HAVING and ORDER BY clauses. They are commonly used with the GROUP BY clause in a SELECT statement, where Oracle Database splits the rows in a table when asked or seen in groups. In a query that contains a GROUP BY clause, the select list items can be aggregation functions, GROUP BY constant expressions or expressions involving one of them. Oracle applies the functions of aggregation for each group of rows and returns a single result for each group line.
If you omit the GROUP BY clause, Oracle then applies any aggregate functions in the select list for all rows in the table queried or the view. You use aggregate functions in the HAVING clause to eliminate groups of the output based on the results of aggregate functions, rather than the values of the individual lines of the queried table or view.Let me know if you feel any problem understanding.
Thank you.Published by: varun4dba on January 27, 2011 15:32
-
Cannot use analytical functions such as lag/lead in odi components 12 c except in the expression
Hi I am a beginner of ODI 12 c
I'm trying to get the last two comments made on the product for a given product id. and load them into a target.
I have a source table something like
Product SR_NO comments LAST_UPDATED_TS
1 good car 2015/05/15 08:30:25
1 car average 2015/05/15 10:30:25
Jeep 2 super 2015/05/15 11:30:25
1 car bad 2015/05/15 11:30:25
Jeep 2 horrible 2015/05/15 09:30:25
Jeep 2 excellent 2015/05/15 12:30:25
I want a target table based on their last timestamp updated as (last two comments)
SR_NO Comment1 Comment2
1 bad average
2 super excellent
I used the logic below to get records in SQL Developer but in ODI 12 c, I'm not able to do this by mapping a source to the target table by applying analytical functions to the columns in the target table. Can someone help me solve this problem
SELECT * FROM)
SELECT SR_NO Comment1, LAG(Comment1,1,) ON Comment2 (SR_NO ORDER BY LAST_UPDATED_TS ASC PARTITION),
ROW_NUMBER() ON RN (SCORE FROM SR_NO ORDER BY LAST_UPDATED_TS DESC)
FROM Source_table
) M
WHERE RN = 1
;
UM, I'm afraid that ODI puts the filter too early in the request, if it generates:
SELECT * FROM)
SELECT SR_NO Comment1, LAG(Comment1,1,) ON Comment2 (SR_NO ORDER BY LAST_UPDATED_TS ASC PARTITION),
ROW_NUMBER() ON RN (SCORE FROM SR_NO ORDER BY LAST_UPDATED_TS DESC)
FROM Source_table
WHERE RN = 1
) M
;
Instead of:
SELECT * FROM)
SELECT SR_NO Comment1, LAG(Comment1,1,) ON Comment2 (SR_NO ORDER BY LAST_UPDATED_TS ASC PARTITION),
ROW_NUMBER() ON RN (SCORE FROM SR_NO ORDER BY LAST_UPDATED_TS DESC)
FROM Source_table
) M
WHERE RN = 1
;
Even by changing the 'run on Hint"of your component of the expression to get there on the source, the request will stay the same.
I think the easiest solution for you is to put everything before the filter in a reusable mapping with a signature of output. Then drag this reusable in your mapping as the new source and check the box "subselect enabled."
Your final mapping should look like this:
It will be useful.
Kind regards
JeromeFr
-
Which analytical function to use?
Hi gurus,DB - Oracle 11 g 2
I followed the examples of data in the table test_a.
col1 col2 col3
----- ------- --------
x y y
p q y
a b y
p q y
t r y
p q y
The col3 column is always 'y '. But here's the data p, q, there is repeated 3 times (duplicate) and if this is the case I want to update only the first recordings like "n" col3 it is to say p, q, n. rest will be as it is.
I am able to get the row_number() for it but not able to do this.
Select col1, clo2, clo3 row_number() over (partition by col2) arrested by col1 as test_a r_num
Would it be possible directly by any analytic function?
Thank you
SID
COL4 is logical...
Something like that?
with x as)
Select col1, col2 ' x' 'y', 'y' col3 col4 1 Union double all the
Select 'p' col1, col2 'q', 'y' col3 col4 2 Union double all the
Select 'a' col1, col2 'b', 'y' col3 col4 3 of all the double union
Select 'p' col1, col2 'q', 'y' col3 col4 4 Union double all the
Select 't' col1, col2 'r', 'y' col3, col4 5 Union double all the
Select 'p' col1, col2 'q', 'y' col3 col4 6 double
)
---
Select * from)
Select x.*,
ROW_NUMBER() on rn1 (score of col1, col2, col3 col4 sort),
ROW_NUMBER() on rn2 (partition by col1, col2, col3 col4 desc sorting)
x
)
where rn1 = 1 and rn2 <> 1;
Understand the logic and simply change SELECT a query to UPDATE...
-
Oracle 11g Release 2
I'm assuming that the best solution is the use of analytical functions.
create table test3 ( part_type_id varchar2(50) ,group_id number ,part_desc_id number ,part_cmt varchar2(50) ) / insert into test3 values( 'ABC123',1,10,'comment1'); insert into test3 values( 'ABC123',1,10,'comment2'); insert into test3 values( 'ABC123',2,15,'comment1'); insert into test3 values( 'ABC123',2,15,'comment2'); insert into test3 values( 'EFG123',25,75,'comment3'); insert into test3 values( 'EFG123',25,75,'comment4'); insert into test3 values( 'EFG123',25,75,'comment5'); insert into test3 values( 'XYZ123',1,10,'comment6'); insert into test3 values( 'XYZ123',2,15,'comment7'); commit; select * from test3; PART_TYPE_ID GROUP_ID PART_DESC_ID PART_CMT -------------------- ---------- ------------ -------------------- ABC123 1 10 comment1 ABC123 1 10 comment2 ABC123 2 15 comment1 ABC123 2 15 comment2 EDG123 25 75 comment3 EDG123 25 75 comment4 EDG123 25 75 comment5 XYZ123 1 10 comment6 XYZ123 2 15 comment7 9 rows selected. Desired output: PART_TYPE_ID GROUP_ID PART_DESC_ID PART_CMT -------------------- ---------- ------------ -------------------- ABC123 1 10 comment1 ABC123 2 15 comment1 XYZ123 1 10 comment1 XYZ123 2 15 comment2 RULE: where one part_type_id has multiple (2 or more distinct combinations) of group_id/part_desc_id NOTE: There are about 12 columns in the table, for brevity I only included 4.
Post edited by: orclrunner was updated desired output and rule
Hello
Here's one way:
WITH got_d_count AS
(
SELECT part_type_id, group_id, part_desc_id
MIN (part_cmt) AS min_part_cmt
COUNT AS d_count (*) OVER (PARTITION BY part_type_id)
OF test3
GROUP BY part_type_id, group_id, part_desc_id
)
SELECT DISTINCT
group_id, part_desc_id, part_type_id, min_part_cmt
OF got_d_count
WHERE d_count > 1
;
Output:
GROUP_ID PART_DESC_ID MIN_PART_CMT PART_TYPE_ID
------------ ---------- ------------ ------------
ABC123 1 10 comment1
ABC123 2 15 comment1
XYZ123 1 10 comment6
XYZ123 2 15 comment7
Analytical functions, such as the COUNTY and MIN, many global versions, in addition, it can give the same results. Use the analytical versions when each row of output corresponds to exactly 1 row of input and the aggregate and GROUP BY version when each line of output corresponds to a group of lines 1 or more input. In this issue, each line of output appears to be a group of input lines having the same group_id, part_type_id, and part_desc_id (I'm guessing just, this only has never stated), so I used GROUP BY to get 1 row of output for every input lines.
-
Truncate output of analytical function?
For example this query:
Select month, sum (tot_sales) monthly_sales,.
AVG (Sum (tot_sales)) (any order by month
between 1 above and 1 below) rolling_avg
orders
where year = 2001 and region_id = 6
Group by month;
gives me an output which includes several decimal places for the rolling_avg column.
Is there a way to truncate this? I tried to use the rounded outside the analytical function and surely enough, it didn't work. I can't think otherwise.
You can use an external selection on the result of this query
select trunc(rolling_avg) from ( rolling_avg query);
-
Nth salary using the analytic function
I use under function to calculate second highest with empno and deptno salary.
Is it possible to get the same result with another query without using Assembly only analytical functions condition.using and windows function is possible to get the desired output?
SELECT e.empno,
e.DEPTNO,
tmp. SAL as second_higher_salary
FROM emp e,.
(SELECT Empno,
DEPTNO,
SAL,
DENSE_RANK() (PARTITION BY deptno ORDER of sal) AS rnk
WCP
) tmp
WHERE tmp.deptno = e.deptno
and tmp.rnk = 2
EMPNO DEPTNO SAL
---------- ---------- ----------
7934 10 2450
7782 10 2450
7839 10 2450
7876 20 1100
7369 20 1100
7902 20 1100
7788 20 1100
7566 20 1100
7900 30 1250
7844 30 1250
7654 30 1250
7521 30 1250
7499 30 1250
7698 30 1250
7900 30 1250
7844 30 1250
7654 30 1250
7521 30 1250
7499 30 1250
7698 30 1250
Here's my solution:
Select empno,
DEPTNO,
FIRST_VALUE (sal) (PARTITION BY deptno ORDER by sal desc)
de)
SELECT EmpNo,
DEPTNO,
Decode (DENSE_RANK () OVER (PARTITION BY deptno order by sal desc), 1,-sal, sal) sal
WCP
)
/
EMPNO DEPTNO FIRST_VALUE (SAL) OVER (PARTITIONBYDEPTNOORDERBYSALDESC) ---------- ---------- -----------------------------------------------------
7782 10 2450 7934 10 2450 7839 10 2450 7566 20 2975 7876 20 2975 7369 20 2975 7788 20 2975 7902 20 2975 7499 30 1600 7844 30 1600 7654 30 1600 7521 30 1600 7900 30 1600 7698 30 1600 -
Why the different values for an analytic function of the same group/game
I have the suite of table I'll be using.
Select * from table1;
REC_ID | STATUS | DATE_FROM | DATE_TO
1. C | 7 January 2015 |
2. H | December 3, 2014. 6 January 2015
3. H | October 3, 2014. December 2, 2014
4. H | May 30, 2014. October 2, 2014
5. H | May 29, 2014 | May 29, 2014
6. H | April 16, 2014 | May 28, 2014
7. H | Tuesday, April 25, 2007 April 15, 2014
INSERT statement if you need.
TOGETHER TO DEFINE
CREATE THE TABLE1 TABLE:
(
NUMBER OF REC_ID,
VARCHAR2 (1 BYTE) STATUS NOT NULL,.
DATE_FROM DATE NOT NULL,
DATE OF DATE_TO
);
Insert into TABLE1
(REC_ID, STATUS, DATE_FROM)
Values
(1, 'C', TO_DATE (7 JANUARY 2015 00:00:00 ',' DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'));))
Insert into TABLE1
(REC_ID, STATUS, DATE_FROM, DATE_TO)
Values
(2, 'H', TO_DATE (3 DECEMBER 2014 00:00:00 ',' DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'), TO_DATE (6 JANUARY 2015 00:00:00 ',' DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'));))
Insert into TABLE1
(REC_ID, STATUS, DATE_FROM, DATE_TO)
Values
(3, 'H', TO_DATE (3 OCTOBER 2014 00:00:00 ',' DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'), TO_DATE (2 DECEMBER 2014 00:00:00 ',' DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'));))
Insert into TABLE1
(REC_ID, STATUS, DATE_FROM, DATE_TO)
Values
(4, 'H', TO_DATE (MAY 30, 2014 00:00:00 ',' DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'), TO_DATE (2 OCTOBER 2014 00:00:00 ',' DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'));))
Insert into TABLE1
(REC_ID, STATUS, DATE_FROM, DATE_TO)
Values
(5, 'H', TO_DATE (29 MAY 2014 00:00:00 ',' DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'), TO_DATE (29 MAY 2014 00:00:00 ',' DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'));))
Insert into TABLE1
(REC_ID, STATUS, DATE_FROM, DATE_TO)
Values
(6, 'H', TO_DATE (APRIL 16, 2014 00:00:00 ',' DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'), TO_DATE (28 MAY 2014 00:00:00 ',' DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'));))
Insert into TABLE1
(REC_ID, STATUS, DATE_FROM, DATE_TO)
Values
(7, 'H', TO_DATE (APRIL 25, 2007 00:00:00 ',' DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'), TO_DATE (APRIL 15, 2014 00:00:00 ',' DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'));))
COMMIT;
I will exercise more analytical query...
Select rec_id date_from, date_to, status,
min (date_from) over (partition by order of status by date_from desc) min_dt_from_grp,
ROW_NUMBER() over (partition by order of status by date_from desc) rownumberdesc,
ROW_NUMBER() over (partition by order of status by ASC date_from) rownumberasc
FROM table1;
the query result
REC_ID | DATE_FROM | DATE_TO | STATUS | MIN_DT_FROM_GRP | ROWNUMBERDESC | ROWNUMBERASC
1. 7 January 2015 | C | 7 January 2015 | 1. 1
2. December 3, 2014. 6 January 2015 | H | December 3, 2014. 1. 6
3. October 3, 2014. December 2, 2014 | H | October 3, 2014. 2. 5
4. May 30, 2014. October 2, 2014 | H | May 30, 2014. 3. 4
5. May 29, 2014 | May 29, 2014 | H | May 29, 2014 | 4. 3
6. April 16, 2014 | May 28, 2014. H | April 16, 2014 | 5. 2
7. Tuesday, April 25, 2007 April 15, 2014. H | Tuesday, April 25, 2007 6. 1
If you look at the output above, it dates back in the min_dt_from_grp column.
MY question is if the analytical function calculates for a particular/set group, which is by statute and for what min (date_from) partition is 25-apr-2007 for the GROUP H (Status column), then why I have different values returned by the query above in the min_dt_from_grp column.
Hello
Because you have specified an ORDER BY clause for the analytical function. In doing so, you calculate the rows on a window. Since you have not specified a windowing clause, the default applies:
RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW
-
Analytical functions: FIRST vs FIRST_VALUE
Hello
Can someone please help me understand the difference between PRIME and FIRST_VALUE in Anaytic functions.
I tried below 2 queries, but I see the same output. The only difference I see is that the field of the SAL is ordered FIRST_VALUE, but not the FIRST.
SELECT ename,
DEPTNO,
SAL,
MIN (SAL) keep (dense_rank FIRST
ORDER BY sal) by (deptno partition) FIRST
EMP;
SELECT ename,
DEPTNO,
SAL,
FIRST_VALUE (SAL) over (partition BY deptno arrested by sal) FIRST
EMP;
With the help of: Windows 8.1
Database Oracle 12 c Enterprise Edition Release 12.1.0.1.0 - 64 bit Production
PL/SQL Release 12.1.0.1.0 - Production
"CORE 12.1.0.1.0 Production."
AMT for 64-bit Windows: Version 12.1.0.1.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 12.1.0.1.0 - Production
Hello
Here is an example of when you can use the FIRST analytic function.
Say you want the average sal for each Department, but only for the first year (taken from the hiredate column) in the Department (i.e., the column called f in the query below).
WITH got_hireyear AS
(
SELECT deptno and ename, sal, hiredate
EXTRACT (YEAR FROM hiredate) AS hireyear
FROM scott.emp
)
SELECT deptno, hireyear, hiredate, ename, sal
AVG (sal) DUNGEON (DENSE_RANK FIRST ORDER BY hireyear)
COURSES (PARTITION BY deptno
) In the FORM f
FIRST_VALUE (sal) over (PARTITION BY deptno
ORDER BY hireyear
) AS fv
AVG (sal) over (PARTITION BY deptno
hireyear
), A
OF got_hireyear
ORDER BY deptno
hireyear
ename
;
Output:
HIREYEAR ENAME SAL HIREDATE DEPTNO F FV HAS
------ ---------- ----------- ---------- ------ --------- ------ ---------
10 1981 9 June 1981 CLARK 2450 2450 3725,00 3725.00
10 1981 17 November 1981 KING 5000 3725,00 2450 3725.00
10 1982 23 January 1982 MILLER 1300 3725,00 2450 1300.0020, 1980, 17 December 1980 SMITH 800 800.00 800.00 800
20, 1981, 3 December 1981 FORD 3000 800.00 800 2987.50
20, 1981, 2 April 1981 JONES 2975 800.00 800 2987.50
20, 1987, 23 May 1987 ADAMS 1100 800.00 800 2050.00
20, 1987, 19 April 1987 SCOTT 3000 800.00 800 2050.0030 1981 20 February 1981 ALLEN 1600 1566.67 950 1566.67
May 30 1981 1st 1981 BLAKE 2850 1566.67 950 1566.67
December 30 1981 3 1981 JAMES 950 1566.67 950 1566.67
30 1981 28 - sep - 1981 MARTIN 1250 1566.67 950 1566.67
30-08 - sep - 1981 1981 TURNER 1500 1566.67 950 1566.67
30 1981 22 February 1981 WARD 1250 1566.67 950 1566.67The analytical FIRST_VALUE function can do (except in the very special case where only 1 row has the lowest hireyear, as in deptno = 20). AVG analysis can do (except in the very special case that all lines have the same hireyear as in deptno = 30).
-
Hello experts.
I have data similar to what follows below
create table t1 ( id number(30), description varchar(4000) ); insert into t1 values (1, 'zone'); insert into t1 values (2, 'small'); create table t2 ( id number(30), place varchar(4000), info varchar(4000) ); insert into t2 values (1, 'USA', 'Class U'); insert into t2 values (1, 'Mexico', 'Class M'); insert into t2 values (2, 'Germany', 'Class G');
I need help with something similar to what follows below without using any analytic function
Description of the ID info Place
1 box USA class U
Mexico 1 M class
2 small Germany class G
Any help is appreciated. Thank you
Hello
user13328581 wrote:
... I use an older version of oracle. Oracle 7.
Normally, your developers are older than your software.
You should be able to do what you want with a self-join on t2; a copy (d) should be displayed, and the other copy (c) contains all related values you need for comparison.
SELECT t2d.id
DECODE (t2d.place
MAX (t2c.place)
t1.description
) AS description
t2d.place
t2d.info
FROM t1
, t2 t2d - display
t2 t2c - compare
WHERE t1.id = t2d.id
AND t2d.id = t2c.id
GROUP BY t1.description
t2d.id
t2d.place
t2d.info
ORDER BY t2d.id
t2d.place DESC
;
Output:
ID DESCRIPTION PLACE INFO
---------- -------------------- -------------------- --------------------
1 box USA class U
Mexico 1 M class
2 small Germany class G
I've tested this in Oracle 11, but it should work in Oracle 7.
If this isn't the case, you may need to create a view.
-
Hello
Don't you know that it is the analytical function used to access an earlier date for example table RRODUCT
Date amount CN code 25/09/2012 1000 20 26/09/2013 2000 15 27/09/2011 1000 8 28/09/2012 2000 12 29/09/2013 2000 2 30/09/2004 1000 4
and this table contains more than 1000 lines in difeerent years now, I want to get the amount in a given year and the previous year like this 20 + 15 + 12 + 4
I need analytical control that find the previous year 2012 if my year 2013 or find out if 2010 my 2011 yeaar
You can use the YEAR-1 right? SHIFT of analytic function can be used to access the previous line. Your condition is to get the value of the previous year and previous row not. If this isn't what you are looking for then can you post output necessary for data provided?
-
analytical functions in oracle
Hi I am new to oracle analytical functions
I do not know how to use and where to use real-time, please send me the useful any url for it.
I read in the Oracle Documentation , but it's not understand for me.
Please provide me with any other useful URL, I'll read to those.if you have examples, please report it in the present.
Thank you
Check this box:
-
HelloI have a doubt about this analytical function to lead,
I have this table,
create table test3 (no number, name varchar2 (30));
Insert into TEST3 (NO, NAME) values (1, 'fen');
Insert into TEST3 (NO, NAME) Values (3, 'DEN');
Insert into TEST3 (NO, NAME) values (2, 'Sun');
Insert into TEST3 (NO, NAME) values (2, 'sen');
Insert into TEST3 (NO, NAME) values (1, 'end');
COMMIT;I put like that with this request.
Select lead don't (don't) over (partition by any order of name), name of test3.NO NAME
1 fen
end
2 Sun
Sen
DENBut I need as below output, I am unable to get the third 'NO' that has a value, I get null for that, even if I partitioned
by the 'NO '.NO NAME
1 fen
end
2 Sun
Sen
3 DENPlease clear my doubt.
Thanks in advance.
Like this
Select decode (NWR, 1, no, null) no
name
de)
Select row_number() over (partition by any order by name) rno
None
name
of test3
)
-
Hello
I have two tables b rates and transactions (b).
For each b.FS, I want to know new amount (b.amt time a.rate to the corresponding line of FS b and if a.na is valid based on the flag of the exclusion and the interval defined in the table's).
It is much easier to explain with an example.
So here we go...
Exclude_flag = E (exclude): for b.fs = 433638, b.na = 80000. I have 2 lines in the table for this fs. Both have E exclude_flag (exclude). I want to go on all the lines in this FS in the table in a query and I return only one row in the result, if and only if b.na falls out of scope of a.na_min_value and a.na_max_values. In this example, it falls outside the range excluded for both lines (first two lines of the table a).
Similarly, exclude_flag = I (Include). for b.fs = 432828, b.na = 17200. I have 2 lines in the table for this fs. Both have an exclude_flag of I (include). I want to go on all the lines in this FS in the table in a query and I return only one row in the result, if and only if b.na is between a.na_min_value and a.na_max_values. In this example, it falls in the range of both the range include for the two lines (line 6 and 7 of the table a).
The following query gives me two lines for each b.fs. It is possible to get what I'm looking for simply using sql (possibly write the analytical function?) or I have to write the pl/sql routine for this?
WITH rates_table
Did YOU (select ' E' include_exclude_flag, "81000 ' na_min_value, na_max_value '81999', '433638' FS, 0.8 of double rate
UNION
Select 'E' include_exclude_flag, na_min_value '84000', na_max_value '84999', '433638' FS, 0.8 of double rate
UNION
Select 'I' include_exclude_flag, na_min_value '12000', na_max_value '12999', '432828' FS, rate 0.25 double
UNION
Select 'I' include_exclude_flag, na_min_value '13000', na_max_value '13999', '432828' FS, rate 0.25 double
UNION
Select 'I' include_exclude_flag, na_min_value '15000', na_max_value '15000', '432828' FS, rate 0.25 double
UNION
Select 'I' include_exclude_flag, na_min_value '16100', na_max_value '18000', '432828' FS, rate 0.25 double
UNION
Select 'I' include_exclude_flag, '17100' na_min_value, na_max_value '18000', '432828' FS, rate 0.25 double
UNION
Select 'I' include_exclude_flag, na_min_value '02440', na_max_value '02470', '016532' FS, 0.35 rate double
UNION
Select 'E' include_exclude_flag, na_min_value ' 21000 ', '21000' na_max_value, ' 200020' FS, 0.35 double rate).
transaction_table AS
(select '433638' FS '80000' NA, 300 double amt)
Union
Select '432828' FS '17200' NA, amt 500 double
)
Select * from rates_table a, transaction_table b
where 1 = 1
and ((b.na PAS entre a.na_min_value et a.na_max_value et a.include_exclude_flag = «E») GOLD ())
b.na between a.na_min_value and a.na_max_value and a.include_exclude_flag = 'I'))
and b.fs = a.fs
;
Any help is greatly appreciated. I use oracle 11i
@OP,
For this kind of problems, we get the number of rows that satisfy the required conditions or who do not meet the required conditions. And then eliminate the line that should be eliminated.
As below, I calculate four counts (number of join lines)
EOBCNT - excluded and Out of Bound
EIBCNT - excluded and in the limit
IOBCNT - included and Out of Bound
IIBCNT - included and within the limits
Once those are calculated, simply return the lines that have EIBCNT and IOBCNT are zero.
For Ex:
> WITH
rates_table
AS LONG AS)
Select 'E' include_exclude_flag, na_min_value '79999', na_max_value '79999', '433638' FS, 0.8 double UNION rates
-Select 'E' include_exclude_flag, na_min_value ' 79999', na_max_value '80000', '433638' FS, 0.8 double UNION rate - TEST - THE
-If you uncomment the last line and then 433638 will not be returned
Select 'E' include_exclude_flag, "81000 ' na_min_value, na_max_value '81999', '433638' FS, 0.8 double UNION rates
Select 'E' include_exclude_flag, na_min_value '84000', na_max_value '84999', '433638' FS, 0.8 double UNION rates
Select 'I' include_exclude_flag, na_min_value '12000', na_max_value '12999', '432828' FS, 0.25 rate double UNION
Select 'I' include_exclude_flag, na_min_value '13000', na_max_value '13999', '432828' FS, 0.25 rate double UNION
Select 'I' include_exclude_flag, na_min_value '15000', na_max_value '15000', '432828' FS, 0.25 rate double UNION
Select 'I' include_exclude_flag, na_min_value '16100', na_max_value '18000', '432828' FS, 0.25 rate double UNION
Select 'I' include_exclude_flag, '17100' na_min_value, na_max_value '18000', '432828' FS, 0.25 rate double UNION
Select 'I' include_exclude_flag, na_min_value '02440', na_max_value '02470', '016532' FS, 0.35 rate double UNION
Select 'E' include_exclude_flag, na_min_value ' 21000 ', '21000' na_max_value, ' 200020' FS, 0.35 double rate).
transaction_table AS
(select '433638' FS '80000' NA, amt 300 Union double
Select '432828' FS '17200' NA, amt 500 double
)
getcnts as)
SELECT a.*
b.na, b.amt
, sum (case when (b.na NOT BETWEEN a.na_min_value)
AND a.na_max_value
AND a.include_exclude_flag = 'E '.
end) then 1 else 0) on (a.fs partition) Eobcnt
, sum (case when (b.na NOT BETWEEN a.na_min_value)
AND a.na_max_value
AND a.include_exclude_flag = 'I '.
end) then 1 else 0) on (a.fs partition) Iobcnt
, sum (case when (b.na BETWEEN a.na_min_value)
AND a.na_max_value
AND a.include_exclude_flag = 'E '.
end) then 1 else 0) on (a.fs partition) Eibcnt
, sum (case when (b.na BETWEEN a.na_min_value)
AND a.na_max_value
AND a.include_exclude_flag = 'I '.
end) then 1 else 0) on (a.fs partition) Iibcnt
OF rates_table one
transaction_table b
WHERE b.fs = a.fs
)
getrows as)
Select x.*, row_number() on
(partition by order of fs with null desc) getcnts rn x
where IOBCNT = 0 and eibcnt = 0 - remove lines that are not needed (IF and ONLY if)
)
Select * from getrows
where rn = 1 - to limit a SINGLE row (arbitrarily)
INCLUDE_EXCLUDE_FLAG NA_MIN_VALUE NA_MAX_VALUE FS RATE NA AMT EOBCNT IOBCNT EIBCNT IIBCNT RN
-------------------- ------------ ------------ ------ ---------- ----- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
433638 84999 84000.8 E 80000 300 3 0 0 0 1
I hope this helps.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Audio CD not recognized by drive
When I burn an audio CD from my playlist, it is recognized by iTunes and VLC media and plays very well. But my CD player (new, laptop, made by Sony) tries to read it and says "No Disc". However, another CD store bought (for example, an opera and popu
-
enlarge the thumbnails in pictures
Can someone tell me if it is possible to adjust the size of the thumbnails in 'photos' Please?
-
How can I change a name of bookmark in Firefox?
using Windows XP.
-
I can't find anything online about this. It started today, updated firefox (I think, there was an extra tab open when I opened firefox this morning). It is the first time that I've never experienced this. As the title says, only my left control butto
-
I bought the new game of sims 3 and it is said that his capatible to windows vista, but every time I ask in 5 minutes, the game closes right on me and I don't know why