Authentic or not?
I received a card Sandisk Extreme Pro 32 GB SD card recently. I'm already registered it with Sandisk.
How can I check if it is authentic or not?
I sent Sandsik during opening hours, the code number and got answer within half an hour.
That was fast. The card was indeed authentic
Tags: SanDisk Memory
(two-factor authentication is not available for your apple at the moment ID), how can I solve this problem? I can't run many features such as Apple Watch unlock in Sierra, please help
I had this same problem, the message that, ' two-factor authentication is not available for your apple at the moment ID. " All my devices have been updated to the latest version of the software, and all other requirements have been met. I couldn't use two-factor authentication and I couldn't open my mac using my Apple Watch. After contacting the Apple Support, they told me that because I had an email address @mac.com older, this address was not "verified." And that the system was not able to verify the address by sending an email with a link as it does normally; He could do that for more recent @me and addresses of @icloud. Apple had to have a service technician manually to send me an email of check to my address @mac.com. I clicked on the link in the email (I don't need to enter other information), and two factors was not available instantly. Hope that you will find your problem will be solved.
Original title: check genunity
Sir how to check it is my office window is authentic or notYour Windows is genuine?
With a few clicks, you can check if you are using genuine Windows.
If you have already validated Windows, click to view recommendations customized for the resolution and special offers from Microsoft for genuine Windows. Validation will not prevent you to access your files or interfere with the normal operation of your PC.What happens if I do not have Windows genuine?
If your copy of Windows is not validated, the validation results page will be in detail why Windows was not authentic, and you learn quickly and easily solve the problem. To submit a counterfeit report, visit the Microsoft How to Tell website. For information on how to get a version genuine Windows, go to the Get Windows page.
How to check my product was authentic or not?
Which product are you talking?
Windows 7 operating system.
See you soon.
I try a test for the NAC scenario. It's the gateway virtual oob
I get the login page when trying to access the web, but when I try to authenticate to the local db that I get an error message and I am on the authentication screen.
I listened with tcpdump on both interfaces. on the unreliable side, I see traffic but on the side confidence no difference in traffic doesn't appear (but maybe that's normal)
can someone please help with detailed steps that follows authentication
not only host--> nas--> nam (localdb)
or some ideas
check the teporary certificates that you generated and set the field of domain name FULL to the nas ip address and so the nam
Outside cellular service areas, IS those who know how the two step aunthicatuon process works in an iPhone 6, using the operating system iOS 9.3.4? Would a being completely locked out of their iphone and apple services until they could find themselves in a cell service area? Or can it be accessed by a public wifi? Who beg to differ on whether or not it is beneficial to use when you travel?
I did a little research to see if all Apple items shed light...
See "How it works" in the Apple ID - Apple Support for two-factor authentication - a time that a device is approved, he'll never ask again unless you perform one or more of several things to "break the connection.
If I were you, I would spend it TURNED off if you fear that one of these things could happen while you might not be able to obtain the code by SMS
I'm confused as to why Apple would use two different expressions for what seems to be the same:
- "Two -authentication"- and
- "Two -step".
The above two articles begin with a statement like: [underlining is unique, "BOLD" is synonymous with]
"Two-factor authentication is just an extra layer of security of your ID Apple aiming to sure you are the only person who can access to your account, even if someone knows your password."
«The two-step verification is an additional security feature for your Apple which designed to prevent anyone to access or use your account, same ID is they know your password.»
Maybe someone with more experience can shed some light on your question and MY confusion?
iPhone 6 s, iOS 9.3
Apple ID child account, tried to activate two-factor authentication for it but could not find the option enable iCloud / password and security...
Is this by design? Or should I still wait... I thought that all Apple ID accounts are now available for, once upgraded to iOS 9.3, two-factor authentication.
You will need to enable the check in two steps by logging on their identity card to https://appleid.apple.com/
You can activate the two-step verification with any Apple ID, not just those who are upgraded to iOS 9.3
I currently have the two-step verification turned on on my apple ID, even if Apple announced yesterday in a two-step authentication is available for accounts iCloud, my iCloud security settings do not show this as an option. Is it because I currently have two-step verification on?
This is probably the cause. I improved on my iOS devices 10.11.4 yesterday and iOS 9.3 and none showed 2 authentication factors are available. I then connected to https://appleid.apple.com/ and off 2-verification step and disconnected. Then I have to go to the Apple menu > System Preferences > iCloud > Account Details > Security and it showed 2-factor authentication available and I put in place.
I'll give you a brief description of our current flexconnect configuration. We have APs configured mode flexconnect in the remote office and in local mode in the local office. Wireless LANs are the same in both locations and we have detected a problem in one specific SSID. It is a voice SSID and configured in 802.1 x mode that authenticates to a RADIUS server in the remote desktop.
We detected only when the WAN line gets collapsed the IP phones unplugged wireless SSID and when the WAN line become free, reconnected.
We have seen that we can configure Flexconnect local auth mode to avoid this problem, but it of esn can't work properly. We have set up APs in remote site with an IP address static and configured as NAS in the RADIUS server, but we did not see any which authenticayion in th RADIUS server package when change us the SSID to «FlexConnect auth» local
Can you give me an idea to help solve this problem?
Thanks in advance.
I suppose that clients connected by access points Flexconnect have problems where the WAN connection is down (?)
It depends on your current configuration and security policy what are the feasible options in this scenario. If there is an available RADIUS server - who can still authenticate your users while the WAN line is down, you can configure your access points to access this server directly. You must use a FlexConnect for this group and configure the external server on the general tab, in the menu "AAA". You already made the point of access-static IP addresses and add them as clients on the RADIUS server, then it should work.
Another option is that in the event of failure, access points to will authenticate the client based on a local data base and/or certificate. Also, this requires a FlexConnect group and the option 'Enable local authentication AP'. For example: If you are using PEAP and a specific user for VoWLAN account you can download the server and the certificates of CA to the WLC and add the credentials of this account to build the same configuration with the external server. Downside of this is the lack of central logging that may not match your security policy.
Remember that the access point itself can't remember the relationship between the access point and FlexConnect group, in both scenarios, you need to configure all controllers manually with these MAC to the Group mappings. This behavior is different in comparison with the "groups of AP" what access point you remember during the passage of the controllers.
The "FlexConnect local authentication" option on the SSID itself forces always use local authentication that has been configured on the FlexConnect group even if the connection with the WLC is available. I don't think that it is feasible to use it in your scenario.
Please rate helpful messages... :-)
We currently have a switch - ms duncan, who has been put in place for GANYMEDE and works very well. We have the same command on another switch - sw-SPARE parts and it does not work:
enable secret 5 $1$ lyQB$ OUFCNrTeluAVeH9R1Grjm0
username privilege 15 secret 5 netadmin $1$ urJC LbxLOoBdoG1064QFcjTRe1 $
username admin privilege 15 secret 5 LGPp $1$$ QbOZQ8Ch2kpEj.tLKsp1m.
AAA authentication login default group Ganymede + local
authorization AAA console
AAA authorization config-commands
AAA authorization exec default group Ganymede + local
AAA authorization commands 15 default group Ganymede + local
orders accounting AAA 15 by default start-stop Ganymede group.
AAA - the id of the joint session
single-connection host key 10.223.8.29 radius-server CiscoCisco
RADIUS-server application made
Here's the Ganymede of ms-duncan debugging:
MS duncan #.
11w5d: MORE: authentication request treatment 344 AAA queues
11w5d: MORE: treatment demand beginning 344 authentication id
11w5d: MORE: authentication start package created for 344 (reed.vendor)
11w5d: MORE: using the 10.223.8.29 Server
11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) / 0/IDLE / 4383A 40: obtained immediately connect on the new 0
11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) / 0/WRITING / 4383A 40: started 5 sec timeout
11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) 0 / / WRITING: has written 47 bytes any request
11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) 0 / / READ: read all header 12-byte (wait 16 bytes)
11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) 0 / / READ: read all the reply 28 bytes
11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) / 0 / 4383A 40: the package of treatment response
11w5d: MORE: received the authentic GET_PASSWORD response status (8)
11w5d: MORE: authentication request treatment 344 AAA queues
11w5d: MORE: treatment of authentication continue id 344 of demand
11w5d: MORE: authentication continue package generated for 344
11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) / 0/WRITING / 4383CA 8: started 5 sec timeout
11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) 0 / / WRITING: wrote bytes 25 requests
11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) 0 / / READ: read all 12 byte header (allow 6 bytes)
11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) 0 / / READ: read all the reply 18 bytes
11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) / 0 / 4383CA 8: the package of treatment response
11w5d: MORE: received the status of response authentic PASS (2)
11w5d: MORE: queues application of AAA 344 for transformation
11w5d: HIGHER: processing of the application for authorization id 344
11w5d: MORE: Protocol is set to None. Jump
11w5d: MORE: sending service AV = shell
11w5d: MORE: sending AV cmd *.
11w5d: MORE: application created for 344 (reed.vendor)
11w5d: MORE: previously set server group Ganymede 10.223.8.29 +.
11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) / 0/IDLE/4384698: got immediately connect on the new 0
11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) / 0/WRITING/4384698: started 5 sec timeout
11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) 0 / / WRITING: wrote bytes 66 requests
11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) 0 / / READ: read all header 12-byte (wait 18 bytes)
11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) 0 / / READ: read all the answer 30 bytes
11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) / 0/4384698: the package of treatment response
11w5d: MORE: handled AV priv-lvl = 15
11w5d: MORE: received permission to answer for 344: PASS
MS duncan #.
Here's the Ganymede of debugging of sw-SPARE PARTS:
17:17:49.477 Feb 2: MORE: Queuing AAA request authentication 42 for the treatment
17:17:49.477 Feb 2: MORE: treatment demand beginning 42 authentication id
17:17:49.477 Feb 2: MORE: authentication start package created for 42()
17:17:49.477 Feb 2: MORE: using the 10.223.8.29 Server
17:17:49.482 Feb 2: HIGHER (0000002 A) / 452B47C/NB_WAIT/0: started 5 sec timeout
17:17:49.482 Feb 2: HIGHER (0000002 A) / 0/NB_WAIT: 36 bytes written requests
17:17:49.482 Feb 2: MORE: block everything by reading the header pak
17:17:49.487 Feb 2: HIGHER (0000002 A) / 0/452B47C: the package of treatment response
17:17:58.437 Feb 2: MORE: Queuing AAA request authentication 42 for the treatment
17:17:58.437 Feb 2: MORE: treatment demand beginning 42 authentication id
17:17:58.437 Feb 2: MORE: authentication start package created for 42()
17:17:58.437 Feb 2: MORE: using the 10.223.8.29 Server
17:17:58.437 Feb 2: HIGHER (0000002 A) / 4165F60/NB_WAIT/0: started 5 sec timeout
17:17:58.437 Feb 2: HIGHER (0000002 A) / 0/NB_WAIT: 36 bytes written requests
17:17:58.437 Feb 2: MORE: block everything by reading the header pak
17:17:58.442 Feb 2: HIGHER (0000002 A) / 0/4165F60: the package of treatment response
It seems that the problem is that there is no user name in the package of beginning of authentication for the sw-spare:
17:17:49.477 Feb 2: MORE: authentication start package created for 42()
What should we do to solve this problem and get GANYMEDE work on sw-SPARE parts?
You can add another statement to the configuration:
property intellectual Ganymede source interface vlan1
The order is to specify an interface / IP for all GANYMEDE + outgoing packets.
Gmail (with 2 stages of authentication) erratic application password. I can go days with no problems, then have a day where it says the account GMail is invalid and I put in the password for specific times two or three devices so far. I disabled 2 steps of authentication for now see if that helps but would like to fix it. Vodafone say it's a google / gmail issue but not sure I believe that, given the problems I have had with the OS Z10 and the fact that the issue seems to appear a lot on the web, associated with the BB platform. Not seen any solution yet though.
On the Z10, I am running OS 10.1.0.2312. on Vodafone.
You need to unlock your Gmail Captcha, which is a safety device implemented by them to prevent connections «bot» unauthrorized You can unlock your Gmail Captcha to https://accounts.google.com/DisplayUnlockCaptcha then retest your Gmail account.
I just tried to upgrade from the 22.214.171.124 version of the a 126.96.36.199 new and that doing so broke the OS authentication. I checked the settings and 'use Oracle Client' and 'use driver OIC/thickness' are both enabled, the correct paths.
Launch of the previous version instead, the exact same connection works fine.
I use the 11 GR 2 188.8.131.52 x 86 Windows 7 client, in a field. Two versions of the SQL Developer seem to be running in x 86 mode, so they should be able to use the Oracle client.
I managed to make it work. It turned out that when I left my settings to import from the previous version, it does not seem that is imported correctly. It showed as active for the pilot of the OIC, but it was not in reality.
So I had to disable (and restart), then turn it back on (and restart). After that, it worked fine.
I ran into a problem with authentication and am confused if it's something that in our configuration, or if it is seen elsewhere as well?
1. a service account for installation used, who has access to read for the 3 areas in question. The account itself is one of the 3 areas (not sure if this is the origin of the question, but somehow in doubt).
2. a single tenant with 3 mounting identity, one for each region stores, all configured exactly the same way;
Users not in the same domain as the systems (which is also the same domain as the service account), cannot connect. There is no error thrown to the logon screen, after a moment of the authentication attempt, the user is with the login screen allowed out again. If I add accounts, which are not members of a handful of groups, they can identify.
According to the guidelines of VMware, the problem with no authentication is possible that if a user is a member of about 100 nested groups should be solved with update 1, we have applied as well.
Device name: VMware vCAC device
Version of the device: 184.108.40.206 build 1569764
Device name: identity of VMware Appliance
The unit version: 220.127.116.11 build 1545089
Thanks for any advice you may have.
Solved this problem by changing the configuration to use only the tenant default and thereby using Native AD authentication. I hope that it might help others who see similar problems.
I need to integrate Oracle BI EE 10.1.3.4.1 with workspace 11.1.2. To offer the opportunity to work with some BI stuff in Hyperion Workspace to my users.
Has studied two documents:
(1) including Oracle BI EE 10.1.3.4.1 Workspace 11.1.2
(2) oracle® Business Intelligence News Guide Release 10.1.3.4.2
There is a 'Configuration Repository to use a Custom Authenticator' step, and I am confused with it.
It is said:
In the Oracle's administrator of BI tool, open the file appropriate to the RPD and follow these steps:
In the custom authenticator dialog box, click Browse to specify the next value for the Authenticator plugin file:
Note: This file is in the OracleBI\web\bin directory
My BI environment is installed on the server, RHEL. So I installed Oracle BI Administrator Tool on Windows laptop, copied the RHEL server on cell repository, will update the repository and copy it then. But there is no file sawobisauthenticatorproxy3r.dll under the C:\OracleBI\web\bin directory. How could it be? Where can I get this file? Well Google, no option to enter on the internet. I'm sure that this step cannot be ignored.
Guys, please advice how to solve this problem. Or maybe someone might want to send me this file sawobisauthenticatorproxy3r.dll plugin (if it's can't apply an env).
Phew. I found the solution. Uninstalled Oracle BI laptop computer administrator tool and installed OBI EE. Now I see
sawobisauthenticatorproxy3r.dll in C:\OracleBI\web\bin
and can process my deposit.
I am currently configuring a deployment view in our environment. Installation requires that we use smart cards to connect (Aladdin eToken Pro). I have the aladdin software installed on the client computer. When I run the client to view I don't get invited to my PIN and instead get a message indicating that this smart card is required for the connection.
Smart card for my domain authentication is working because I need a smart card to connect to our current physical machines.
Has anyone had an experience getting the aladdin etokens to work?
It's really weird. I don't expect this step to get this part working, but I guess stranger things have occurred.
In general, the answer to your question is to set the GPO of Agent 'AllowSingleSignOn' to false/stop. Then the SSO will not be attempted in remote desktop. If, as you say, you don't want users to have access to the smart card reader in the remote desktop connection or for use with applications, the next step depends on the Protocol. If the end users use PCoIP, then it seems that you do not want to install the Sub-function "PCoIP Smart Card" of the agent Installer and devices will not be redirected. If end users use RDP, then use one of the client group policy to turn off the smart card redirection. In my view, there is also a PCoIP GPO to do the same thing (or he respects the GPO of RDP, offhand, I don't remember that one).
Maybe you are looking for
Hi, I just picked a new Pavilion to the-20nl and I need to add a second hdd for my personal files for the existing SSD. Before you open the laptop, I would like to know if it is possible. Did someone just tried? Thank you Concerning Luca
I own a laptop Satellite A30-514 with Microsoft xp OS. For some time, some DVD (no games) will not play of the drive. some other not. It is not a problem of region - they are all region 2. Windows does not read the disc when inserted and does not rec
I searched in vain for answers to my question, can anyone help? My monitor LCDS240HLBID goes into sleep mode when the PC is turned off, is there an off button to monitor?
I was wondering what programs people use to get audio of their rockets. Also, if it's in the mode where it is a flashdrive (SMC?) you make the individual folders for each artist? Thank you
I've asked this question before and received the response on the withdrawal of the old driver and install the driver updated from the Web site. I now have the problem of no communication between the computer and the printer/scanner. I've done all t