Available to multiple IDS signature appearances?

Similar Questions

• multiple cod files appear at signing - app installs

  Hello.

  As shown in the picture below, when I connect my BB app, multiple cod files appear. I would like to know how I can remove additional cod files, since I'm not able to install the application to all the

  

  any help will be appreciated

  When you perform an OTA you must copy created cod and change the zip extension. Extract the cod shipped and download those individual on the server with the jad download.

• PIX IDS signatures

  Does anyone know the PIX IDS signatures to block Ping scans and Port scans?

  Do the substitution of signatures IDS ACL defined previously? For example; I want to allow people to ping - me (I allowed icmp echo in my ACL), but I want to drop Ping Sweeps and Port scans.

  Gracias.

  PIX IDS signatures are all listed here:

  http://www.Cisco.com/univercd/CC/TD/doc/product/iaabu/PIX/pix_62/syslog/pixemsgs.htm#1032267

  You will notice that it isn't sigs for the port scans and ping sweeps, mainly because it does not detect the PIX. This would imply the PIX to keep track of all the pings or connection attempts and try to understand that if a scanning goes, this is not what the PIX is designed for.

  If you want to see these then a NID system is the best way to go. IDS PIX is very limited and don't look for a very small subset of the signatures, and most of these signatures simply consist of a package, do not try to reconstitute several packages to different hosts or ports.

• Can I update (IDS) signatures to a router with IOS/FW/IDS?

  I have a router with IOS FW/IDS version 12.2.3 3725. Can I update the IDS signatures?

  Sorry, but isn't the answer. IOS IDS signatures are hard coded in the code of IOS. They are rarely updated. All you can really do is allow them or not and some simple check of what they catch.

  HTH,

  Travis

• Using images in the custom Signature appearances

  Dear all,

  I'm looking to use our company logo as part of a custom in a signature appearance.

  When you use Adobe Acrobat Reader DC to create a custom appearance, I selects the option to use an imported graphic, and then click to import graphic files...

  The file picker account however the possibility to open a PDF file to use as an image in the logo. If it is possible for us to convert our image files to PDF format and import it like this, it's a bit complicated.  If I remember the older versions of Adobe Reader, it was possible to import logos that were in different formats (png, JPEG, BMP etc..)

  May I ask if there are plans to support the importer of images in formats other than PDF format?

  Thank you very much in advance for your time.

  Kind regards

  Graham Bruno

  Hi Graham,

  Yes, you can use one of these formats file such as png, JPEG, BMP, etc, but you will have to choose the file format while browsing it so that it gets displayed for selection. Please refer to the screenshot.

  

  In case if you continue all deliver or have any questions please let us know. We will be happy to help you.

  Kind regards

  Nicos

• Upgrade Acrobat and Signature appearances

  We are about to upgrade our Acrobat X to XI users. We have a number of users who have created custom signature appearances that they use at the signing of the documents. In the past when we have upgraded Acrobat these signature appearances have been lost. Is there a way to switch appearances of signature existing to the new version during the upgrade so that they must be recreated by users?

  Search the system a file called "appearances.acrodata". It should be in the Acrobat User folder, in the subfolder of security. The specific location depends on the version of Acrobat/Reader and OS. For example, on Windows XP:

  C:\Documents and Settings\user\Application Data\Adobe\Acrobat\11.0\Security\appearances.acrodata

• The dynamic digital signature appearance

  I tried, but it seems that the topic has not been addressed.

  OK, I have read "Digital Signature appearance" by Adobe and know how to put my own image when displaying digital signatures.

  Looking at a few tutorial from the authors of iText, I saw that it is possible to specify different images to display on the validation of the signature

  status.

  This is a very cool feature, but unfortunately it is not documented at all in Adobe documents... (I had found a description of the patent document)

  For more info)

  Here's what I discovered: the appearance of the signature is organized in several layers (4 defined by Adobe, others by the producer of document).

  painted sequencially when she shows the document.

  What I'm looking for, it's the way different layers are used: one can be used when the signature validation status is unknown, when another

  the validation was successful, and one when it failed.

  For now, all my layers are painted, no question of the validation of the signature.

  (description in "Dynamic overview of electronic signature" is on page 9)

  The multilayer model for appearances of digital signature in PDF format has been deprecated and is no longer part of the ISO standard for PDF (ISO 32000 - 1).  The appearance of the signature is a STATIC thing - as it should be - and can not be changed "on the fly" by the content of the PDF file.

• TCP Hijack on IDS signature

  Someone has a lot of experience with the 'TCP Hijack' signature on the IDS sensors? I checked the NSDB and docs IDS for the engine in question, but neither go into details on how to determine if alerts are false or true positives.

  Any comments would be much appreciated.

  Thank you very much

  Matt

  Under the version of Cisco IDS 3.x, Hamid 3250 only looked at a few ports (TCP 21, 23, 513 and 514, if I remember correctly).

  With the introduction of version 4.x, the signature was no longer limited to these ports. Thus, at least here, we were see a large number of "false positives" involving the web proxy traffic and NetBIOS traffic. BTW, I have no idea if the signature has been coupled to the ports under version 5.x (someone?).

  The logic that we apply to all alarm hamid 3250 we see here is based on two factors: intent and feasibility.

  Although it is theoretically possible to divert most oriented session TCP connections between a client and a server, there are some that simply make no sense.

  If you take alarms involving TCP port 80, what would be the point to divert someone connecting to a web server? Anything sensitive that someone could do this using a browser is done via HTTPS (SSL/TLS aka), so Cryptography will eliminate the threat of hijacking it. So now you re left with web access unsecure. what you are more likely to find if divert you this? Someone looking at the comic strip Dilbert, or something as I imagine... I think you will agree that, therefore, there is no intention at all.

  As with any attack of diversion, the feasibility is quite low. Most of these attacks requires that the hijacker be in the same domain as the intended victim. That being said, it goes without saying that you aren t also see cache poisoning attacks ARP or TCP Syn flooding (or another DoS attack against the victim), you aren t see a valid hijack alarm. Of course, the problem here is that these activities usually occur in an area that is not supervised by a NIDS, then you will need other corroborating data to see (HIDS/NNIDS, router logs).

  In all cases, these alarms are not very useful on their own. When they become valuable, in my opinion, is when they appear in concert with other alarms (e.g. Hamid 7105 - imbalance of ARP requests).

  I hope this helps.

  Alex Arndt

• How to extract the value of the signature (appearance)

  I asked my users to create an appearance for their signature showing that the 'name' and 'logo '.  I want to create a script to verify this aspect and display an alert if they did not follow the rule to create a signature. the value property indicates the word < < dict > > is it possible to delete a signature via javascript, is it not meet requierments, prevent the signing, forcing an appeareance or just change the appearance by default so that the user should not change?

  No, you can do most of this with JavaScript. You have access to is the data in an object SignatureInfo returned by the field.signatureInfo method:

  http://livedocs.Adobe.com/acrobat_sdk/9.1/Acrobat9_1_HTMLHelp/JS_API_AcroJS.88.756.html

  With the field.signatureSetSeedValue method, you can preconfigure a specific field to use a specific named appearance, but I don't know how you would handle this for multiple users because their appearance signature names would be probably different: http://livedocs.adobe.com/acrobat_sdk/9.1/Acrobat9_1_HTMLHelp/JS_API_AcroJS.88.757.html

• Why does my signature appear clearer than normal text?

  I typed in my signature, as noted, but it does not appear as the "body text" or the same as the body of my emails that I type. He appears as a footer and is lighter than normal text.

  Thunderbird shows after the separator of signature (dashboard dashboard entered space) in gray. Maybe others don't have the right signature delimiter? Note that the signature is not physically changed in gray text in the outgoing email, it is just a matter of how Thunderbird displays it.

• Explanations of IPS/IDS signatures?

  Anyone know where I can find an explanation of the individual signatures that are used in a 4215?

  Thanks in advance!

  Hello

  All Signatures IDS/IPS can be found in the section My SDN. You can click on any of the Signature ID or release and enter the details of the information.

  You can visit my SDN (required ORC) at http://tools.cisco.com/MySDN/Intelligence/searchSignatures.x?currentPage=1&st=sd&so=d

  Hope that helps,

  Please rate if this can help.

  Kind regards

  Samuel Wilson

• WLC v4.2.112.0 - IDS Signatures - Deauth/Auth and flooding of the Assoc

  Hi all

  My apologies if this has already asked. There seems to be several posts with people getting critical alarms and they are due to bugs in Cisco?

  Couple of points.

  I am under the above version and I'm getting a lot of IDS Deauth Auth and Assoc alarms on WLCs/WCS.

  How can I find out if these are some releated bug or not?

  Also, does anyone know how these three and the other signature attack work? IE, a deauth is a number of deauth messages sent to an access point, but how much is sent before the WLC reports on them? That is to say, what are the criteria to generate the IDS alarms. Also for other signature attacks?

  It doesn't seem to be too docs on the web?

  Many thx and sincere friendships,

  Ken

  Ken:

  It is a region that has been a bit murky documentation. There have been a number of requests for better documentation, but we are still waiting to see.

  Surprisingly, one of the best forms of

  "documentation" is by examining the signature file wireless IDS which has a few comments and explains how settings work. You can see what a little enlightening.

  In addition, when it comes to false alarms, we have seen a number of them in various flavors. Here are a few thoughts:

  If you run "containment" or rogue APs, wireless ID system currently interprets its own messages of containment as a false-positive/attack. This is a known bug ( CSCsj06015 ) that says: it is fixed, but to my knowledge continues to be a problem.

  Here is a link to the bug:

  http://Tools.Cisco.com/support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCsj06015

  Also, when some brands of customers go out of scope, a string of messages disassociation is sent via the Russia Federation to ensure that the RF connection is broken. However, the number of these legitimate trusts sometimes exceeds the allowed value in the signature CODES of Cisco Wireless file and the WLC erroneously interprets as a false positive / attack, whereas in fact, it's a normal approval. The number of detections per second value can be adjusted (in fact, the proposed TAC make some changes here - but this really needs to be better set at the factory to prevent them to ancestral). One of the links below explains the methodology to change wireless IDs. The most recent versions of the WCS/WLC are supposed to allow a change of parameter/GUI based these parameters vs export/edition/download the signature file wireless IDS on/in each WLC.

  For your reading pleasure, here are some links that you might find useful who discuss various wrinkles in wireless IDs:

  http://forums.Cisco.com/eForum/servlet/NetProf?page=NetProf&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Dpass_through%26location%3Doutline%40%5E1%40.1ddf672c/0#selected_message

  http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&forum=Expert%20Archive&topic=Wireless%20-%20Mobility&topicID=.ee7f999&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Dpass_through%26location%3Doutline%40%5E1%40%40.2cbf522e/16#selected_message

  http://forums.Cisco.com/eForum/servlet/NetProf?page=NetProf&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Dpass_through%26location%3Doutline%40%5E1%40.2cbf520e/1#selected_message

  http://forums.Cisco.com/eForum/servlet/NetProf?page=NetProf&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Dpass_through%26location%3Doutline%40%5E1%40.2cbeccbc/0#selected_message

  http://forums.Cisco.com/eForum/servlet/NetProf?page=NetProf&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Dpass_through%26location%3Doutline%40%5E1%40.1ddfaecb/1#selected_message

  Thank you

  John

  (Don't forget to rate helpful messages)

• IDS signatures

  Hello

  Some exist tool to develop signatures for new protocols in Cisco IDS?

  Thank you

  Leandro.

  I do not exactly understand your question, but here's a link to the documentation about the writing of signatures for the Cisco IDS devices. I hope this helps.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/sw/secursw/ps2113/products_installation_and_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00801a0c28.html

• "Related searches" option available on eBay, although that appears on IE8

  The "Related searches" option disappeared in eBay (a little less your search results), although it is available in IE8 on my PC and Firefox on another PC at home. I have the lateest 3.6.4 version

  This has happened

  Each time Firefox opened

  == I am operating the previous version of Firefox, the update did not help!

  "Clear the Cache": Tools > Options > advanced > network > storage (Cache) offline: 'clear now '.
  'Delete Cookies' of sites that cause problems: Tools > Options > privacy > Cookies: "show the Cookies".

  Start Firefox in Firefox to solve the issues in Safe Mode to check if one of your modules is causing your problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Tools > Modules > themes).
  See the extensions, themes and problems of hardware acceleration to resolve common troubleshooting Firefox problems and troubleshooting questions with plugins like Flash or Java to solve common Firefox problems
  ---
  See also the problems that cause to not show images

• Fonts installed - available through programs - do not appear in C:\Windows\Fonts? Why?

  Slowly, I'm losing my mind here! I have a few fonts installed; specifically, variants of Helvetica Neue and Janson Text Std LT.

  If I use something, say, Photoshop, all my installed fonts and all their variants appear and operate as it should, so I'm assuming that the fonts are, indeed, properly installed; looking at my fonts via the Control Panel, however, some variations do not appear! For example, I have several weights of Helvetica Neue: 45, 55, 65, 75, etc. When I opened C:\Windows\Fonts, some of these variants do not appear! The same thing with the family of Janson Text: I see only the "BOLD" weight, even though Regular, Italic and Bold Italic are also installed.

  If I browse the directory on the command line, I see the files of fonts listed... and actually, I see some files have weird duplicate names (almost: things like "_0" or "_1" annex...) I will try cleaning that upward, but if it does not work... :(

  Thanks for the tips!

  Edit: I tried manually removing some of these strange filenames, but I get an access denied message. In addition, I can't change the attributes of the font files, either...

  Edit 2: I started in Mode safe mode, deleted the font files, delete C:/Windows/system32/FNTCACHE. DAT and restarted, but the displayed fonts in C:\Windows\Fonts still aren't reflecting precisely what is installed... :(

  Hi Bgoulette612,

  The fonts are probably hidden. Windows can hide fonts that are not designed for your input language settings. You can let Windows show and hide fonts automatically, or you can choose to display all fonts installed on your computer in your programs

  1. Click here to open fonts.

  2. in the left pane, click font settings.

  3. clear the check box hide fonts based on language settings .

  4. click on OK

  If the fonts were previously hidden, they will be visible now.

  That solve the problem?

  The links below for more information on access fonts:

  Change your font settings

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/change-your-font-settings

   

  Fonts: Frequently asked questions

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/fonts-frequently-asked-questions

  I hope this helps!

  Gokul - Microsoft Support

  [If this post was helpful, please click the button "Vote as helpful" (green triangle). If it can help solve your problem, click on the button 'Propose as answer' or 'mark as answer '. [By proposing / marking a post as answer or useful you help others find the answer more quickly.]