Bandwidth limitations

Similar Questions

• Bandwidth limits

  We got 4 PC group residential all the connected to the router v7.0 of linksys wrt54g (which got 2 mb flash and cannot be improved with limits on the use of bandwidth for each port). To remedy this, I tried on 1 pc which is an older hp pavilion to reduce the bandwidth in the group windows 7 QoS policies advance settings by selecting the level 2 which should be 1-2 MB instead of the faster, which is 16 MB. But after the change and restart according to speedtest.net, it is still 16...

  BTW, problem is of course that, when some users to download a large part through torrents, internet of the other pc will slow down.

  All PC'm deepfreeze so when frozen, any State is again at the restart. If users are allowed to install something private, although should not be on the PC after the reboot.

  Please see the following weblink which will help you with some utilities that will help you do this:

  http://www.ehow.com/how_6835895_restrict-Internet-speed.html

• With VERY bandwidth limited and occasional, how can I limit the se apparently DESPERATE NEED to download everything always?

  I live on a boat and am sometimes lucky enough to have the public wifi from a port of Marina or the city, but I'm usually limited by my 2 GB of monthly access "hot spot" on my iPhone. Creative cloud tries constantly to update NOW and store things IN THE CLOUD... I can't do it. I tried locking the CC, but the next thing I know, I think that he has consulted the cloud through some avenue, of which I was not aware. I must have the control of access to the Internet for all my applications. How do I do that?

  TIA, Peggy Bjarno

  Hi Peggy,

  You can download only the applications you need the desktop CC application.

  Otherwise you can simply disable the Sync feature as mentioned in the getting started with Creative Cloud connection

  Kind regards

  Sheena

• Bandwidth limited by switch SF302 - 08 p?

  Just put in a SF302 switch - 08 p with of two AP541N. Just a Comcast modem connects in the switch with two Pat, nothing else. Speedtest via the modem cable with nothing plugged it is 48Mbps. Then connect a single switch the laptop shows a 33Mbps speedtest. Then, with the two connected AP541N and using the same laptop via WiFi, I had seen systematically 10 Mbps for download. But right now the cable modem directly showed me almost 50Mbps at a speed test.

  Have by default in all devices, Cisco, factory and poured on the settings and it seems that the throttling is disabled. Suspecting perhaps it's for the quality of service and optimize the voice, but I see specific locations in devices where I could name optimization of voice and those who are not allowed. Then started thinking about tweaking wireless spectrum, but did not want to do anything too unstable.

  Anyone else run into this? Am I missing something obvious?

  -Ed

  Hi Ed,

  This is not typical of the switch. First of all, please make sure that the switch is at least the 1.1.2.0 firmware, this is the most stable version. There is a new version from this week 1.2.7.76 if you want to give this a go as well. After the flash/update firmware, factory of resets the device.

  I recommend starting with Layer 1 and layer 1 related parameters. As a trading port. If you check the port management, you're negotiating 10, 100, 100, full or half-duplex? Don't you see any kind of beating on the log port? (link up, down on the link to one of the ports). Can you try to disable the EEE (energy efficient ethernet) throughout the world and on the parameters of the interface? If you go to the smart port section and go to the interface parameter, it seems that the smart port negotiated anything with the modem?

  -Tom

• Hello, can I ask a question about the limits of bandwidth RTMFP

  Hello, rtmfp downloaded from the node and the download to another node, but the FMS bandwidth bandwidth limits Client.getBandwidthLimit () seems only to limit the bandwidth of the server to the client such as RTMP, request how to limit the bandwidth between the nodes, such as RTMFP. MIKE HELP me THANKS!

  He has no control of bandwidth for P2P network traffic limit.

• NVIDIA Geforce GT640 good graphics card for PrE10 despite the bandwidth low memory?

  Can anyone confirm that the nVidia Geforce GT640 is a reasonable graphics for first 10 Elements and Photoshop Elements 10?

  The person who set up my office of 3770K Core i7 with 16 GB of RAM at 1600 mHz installed map GT640 nVidia with 2 GB memory DDR3. He said that it was a good (low cost) card for video editing because it has 384 CUDA cores - very useful for video editing. I'm pretty ignorant on graphics cards, but as the power consumption low, 65 watts and deemed cool temperature resistance. I have read since DDR5 memory would have been much faster due to a higher bandwidth memory - say 80-90 GB per second compared to 28.5 Gb per second for DDR3 memory on the GT640 map. I've been after use of economic power. DDR5 memory cards use 110 watts upward and run a lot hotter than the DDR 3 cards, all other things being equal. Really fast cards require a special power and cooling.

  Does anyone know if the bandwidth limited memory is important in video editing? Speed is much more critical in the game than in video editing? Are other attributes such as 384 hearts CUDA, synchronization of nvenc, dedicated encodment, 28nm architecture Kepler, frame buffer of memory 2 GB, 1.3 billion transistors, many units of texture - more important than bandwidth memory in video editing? Limited by memory bandwidth DDR3 affects the image quality?

  I read that the GT640 would be much faster (producing the best image quality?) as the HD4000 integrated Intel graphics processor Core i7 Ivy Bridge. Is it so?

  Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit and all programs are installed on a SSD 120 GB OCZ Agility 3. My data drive is a 1 to 7200 RPM Seagate SATA 3. I have a nice 21 inch ASUS LED monitor and recorder blu - ray LG vs228n.

  I did a lot of editing with PrE 3 with a desktop Dell 3.06 gHz hyperthreading and Win XP. The output and even control the preview was clear and stable. I'm continuing to capture a mini tape dv standard definition of a 3 months Panasonic handycam FireWire, but plan to upgrade to HD 3MOS to flash memory. I do really small control - about 7cm wide - PR10 screen, because the quality of the preview image is much poorer than the quality I experienced with the first elements 3 with Win XP program. This is just an indication of the memory gain in pre 10 previews? I expect the output to be much higher, although still mpeg2-DVD quality until I update my camera. I put the record on the maximum bit rate.

  In any case, despite these reservations with the quality of the preview, the GT640 seems very well on stage. Quality of the image in Photoshop, and online on my computer is excellent.

  I updated the driver nVidia yesterday to version 306.23 display.

  Almost all graphics cards forums are subject of the game. I hope to see more forums on graph editing here.

  What do you think of the 2 GB nVidia GT640 for editing with 10 pre-Photoshop Elements 10? How about image quality in the pre 10 monitor compared to the quality of the production? Quality of the image in the monitor of the PrE 3 sharper and more stable, because I imagine?

  Regards, Phil

  Premiere Elements is not chart-map-dependent. You should be fine. In fact, finer.

• COCOMO developer Limitation

  I was just wondering, how many client can connect to cocomo and bandwidth limitation?
  
  
  Thank you
  
  
  teddysetiawan

  Hello

  For the public beta, using an account has the following quotas:

  * 25 concurrent users
  * 15 000 minutes user accumulated per month
  * 250 000 messages posted per month
  * 3 GB of bandwidth (in + out) by month

  Thank you
  Hironmay Basu

• Ridiculously long download time Sierra.

  I did not start the download Sierra yesterday until after I am home from work here in the Central time zone, thinking the manic rush put to the test the Apple servers would be more after 5 to 6 hours.

  That I was wrong.

  I started the download and was initially thrilled to see it would take less than 30 minutes. But none. After about 25% of the download, I was informed the time needed for downloading amounted to 5-6 hours, and in the course of the next hour, the time required regularly rose at the top, no kidding, "someday, 11 hours."

  So I called my ISP and after I restarted my computer, my router and my modem, I ran Speedtest (see below).

  http://www.Speedtest.NET/my-result/5649708170

  I then restarted the download, and in a few minutes, the total download time estimated again exploded within 30 minutes for well over a day.

  I have a life, so I gave up the download from one day to the next, with the hope, once again, that the race would be seriously reduced by the time wherever I tried again this morning.

  Ha! I write this, now the estimated download time is "two days."

  I am happy that Apple is a success of these days (I remember the dark days of the mid - 90s), but C'mon - it is of nuts!

  What gives?

  It's a popular download, is a large download, it is free to download but just as importantly, it's a download of TCP/IP, so, to do a checksum for all data sent. It's not like a UDP stream movies Netflix or XBL HD where the data does not have to check so it is much more complex. Your ISP can be the fastest thing out there but it is still limited to the Apple bandwidth limited when something this big and with all these factors and expected goes live.

• How can I calculate the amount of download and upload traffic within a single session?

  Hi, I would like to calculate how much the traffic of data (in bytes) that I use a session (time).
  Mind you, I speak not of connection speed.
  I guess I have sum download traffic to forward traffic, but I don't know where I can find it in my Firefox or my OS, and Linux.
  Can you help me?

  This is due to the use of a provider with a download bandwidth limits?

  There is an Extension Point called 'Net use'
  https://addons.Mozilla.org/firefox/addon/NET-usage-item/
  http://netusage.iau5.com/

• Apple TV Remote app using when the personal hotspot

  Due to bandwidth limitations, I am better off using Apple TV via a personal hotspot on my iPad (ATT now plan has unlimited data available).  However, once the TV is connected to the personal hotspot, and Apple TV works very well using the included Apple Remote, if I try to activate the Remote app on the iPad it says unable to connect to a Local network.  You must connect to a WiFi network to control iTunes or Apple TV.  If the iPad app is looking for WiFi while the iPad is broadcasting a Personal Hotspot via WiFi to the Apple TV.

  Is it possible to fix this?  In addition, I sure with Apple TV 4 (latest version) would recognize my Apple's Bluetooth keyboard!

  You have to be on wifi, no way around that. Bluetooth keyboards are not supported at this time. Also, best to check with ATT on the terms of the plan (more connection after certain Butterfly amplifiers and do not permit this type of use).

• Isolate the iPad Pro downloads since Photo Push SD card to iCloud

  I recently made a trip to the coast with my digital SLR camera, an iPad Pro and SD lightning adapter.  In general, I use Photos.app on my rMPB 13 "with a disk external DRIVE containing a reference of all DSLR photos library.  To save space and reduction of risk, I left the combo rMBP/HDD home for this trip.  Download photos DSLR to the iPad was certainly convenient and, at the time, worked very well, especially since I could see both iPhone and blows all DSLR at the same place (learned to love the Apple ecosystem, at least in concept).  All software was up-to-date as of January 3, 2016.

  Unfortunately, when I got home, I realized that I was not only download photos DSLR to my iPad, they were jostled in my iCloud photo library as well.  I love the photo library from iCloud, but I need to use files referenced for my digital SLR to support multiple users on my computer (otherwise, I would need to support the two libraries in double, not to mention space iCloud and Uploader for iPad/download bandwidth Mac).  Now I get files duplicate (a referenced, an iCloud) for each DSLR, even after "deletion" versions iCloud before importing the files referenced using the OS X Photos (photos of iCloud returned the next day).  It's particularly bad for me because it was an important meeting (~ 25 GB) and to capture pictures of the iPhone for local backup, Photos on OS X is configured to download the iCloud library.  As a result, I now have about 25 GB of space gnawed on my limited rMBP SSD with these pictures in double; exactly what I was trying to avoid when setting up my external HARD disc reference library.  I think that delete the photos on the side of iOS of Photos will solve my problem (fingers crossed).

  Thus, in the light of the foregoing, I would like to know if there is a way to create a photo album on iOS which is isolated from the automatic pusher of the iCloud to Apple servers library?  This would allow me to use the iPad to see all photos of the day, the two SLRS and iPhone (because the iPhone 6 s has made a worthy camera), without screw my system to file it when I come home and break my bandwidth limits...

  I would like to know if there is a way to create a photo album on iOS which is isolated from the automatic pusher of the iCloud to Apple servers library?

  No, a library of Photos is synchronized completely. all of the photos you import photos can be synchronized to iCloud photo library, or added to my photo stream if you enable these services.      Do not use if you do not want to download all the new photos. Download of your photos by using a USB connection and using iTunes Sync Photo.

  On your Mac, you could separate the photos referenced in the iCloud downloads using a smart album "Photo is referenced", since the referenced pictures will not download to iCloud photo library.

• Question of Orbi Triband

  This router will split the bandwidth incoming to do little, cut of bandwidth dedicated for each device?

  If so this will increase or decrease my overall WiFi speed?

  Marcokamoto wrote:
  This router will split the bandwidth incoming to do little, cut of bandwidth dedicated for each device?

  If so this will increase or decrease my overall WiFi speed?

  Hello

  im not sure what you're asking, but as I know there is no bandwidth limiting characteristics on the orbi until what you ask is not possible

  in fact, you won't find bandwidth real limitation of capacity on several stocks apart from cab Gargoyle firmware, asus routers firmwares also make the limitation of bandwidth on some routers, but its not available for the orbi

  Standard QOS is not the limitation of bandwidth as it is just a priority based on the demand system that can not and does not normally do what you want

  -----------------------------

  in the second part of your question what do you by improving your overall speed of WiFi? you're talking about the internet or your actual sync to the system orbi speed

  Pete

• Vs GS208 vs GS608 GS108

  I see almost no difference in the specs between switches GS108/208/608. One of these is actually a superior product, or the seller does just pay twice as much for the addition of "Business class" to the brand? This purchase is for use of Home Office, with a few large internal volume of traffic longer than the usual external video cable-bandwidth limited downloads, etc.

  Thank you!

  Hi rdb,

  Yes, all PROSAFE line has a higher MTBF over SOHO versions, and it has a lifetime warranty hardware thats why the price is a little different. Performance should be the same, although they may have a different hardware and chipsets, the GS208 is the latest version of the GS608, you can consider an update of cheaper material.

  Thank you

• Increase in the rate of sampling with external clock

  Hi all

  I have hardware DAQ-SMU-6361 and SMU-8360 controller in an express chassis SMU-1071. My 6361 maximum sampling frequency is 2 MECH. / s. But I want to use my daq with higher sampling rates. After going through the various positions, I decided for two options to increase my sampling rate. You must connect a 5 MHz signal generator to use as an external clock. Another is to use the timer to synchronize PXI Chassis

  My question is

  (1) what is the limit to the frequency that we can use as external clock for data acquisition? Which parameter is limiting the performance of the ADC, if we use the higher clock frequency signal?

  (2) I also learned about an option called 'base time in PXI Express chassis'. can I use this option? Someone please give me a link to a good tutorial on the basis of time in a single PXI Express chassis?

  (3) SMU-1071 chasis, 100 MHz differential clock. Is it possible to use it as a clock to my DAQ 6361 signal?

  Concerning

  Vaidhin.

  HI Vaidhin,

  The article mentions the background basket clock as a possible means for synchronization, but this is accomplished using it as a phase reference clock - align the oscillators on board your hardware DAQ which are then distributed down to produce the sample clock.  You may not use background basket clock or time base on board directly as a sample clock (on the one hand, these signals is much too fast).

  Measuring 1 MHz with a DAQ hardware 2 MHz could not give you what you expect.  You will get 2 points per period of your entry - it's just at the limit to avoid aliasing of your signal and of course do not a good characterization of the shape of your signal.  You might be able to push the card in slightly beyond 2 MHz but not significantly enough to make a huge difference.  You are right that if you have sounds at higher frequencies could be an alias down in your signal.  Any noise above ~1.7 MHz will begin to be eased by a bandwidth limited the 6163 (there is a chart in the specifications , showing the bandwidth).  If you have between 1 MHz (signal) and ~1.7 MHz noise, you might look into an external filter, but again you are always sampling very slowly to be able to characterize the shape of the signal.

  The next steps to the top (in terms of sampling frequency) would be as follows:

  4 MHz: SMU-6124

  10 MHz: PXI-6115

  There are currently no products that use the same DAQmx driver who can enjoy beyond 10 MHz, but NEITHER there also a range of scanners that you may enjoy a lot faster.  If you are interested in sampling up to 100 MHz, you may consider looking in the SMU-5122- there are also faster scanners available, but these are probably not necessary for your application.

  Best regards

• Weighted Bandlimited a calculation of rms noise

  Hi all

  I want to calculate the band including a weighted rms noise.   I'm able to calculate noise from rms to an analog signal without any bandwidth limitation.  Find the attached vi for details.  I want to limit the bandwidth to some known values (say 20 Hz to 20 kHz) and then calculate the rms noise.

  Please advice.

  Thank you best regards &,.

  Siva

  Siva,

  What is the problem you are having?

  I do not have the Sound and Vibration Toolkit, but when I replace it with a filter from the palette of Signal Processing, I get changes in bandwidth and in the calculation of rms.  The RMS.vi of the mathematics > probability & statistics palette produces the same value you use the VI of statistics. Based on average DC - RMS.vi Signal Processing > range of measures of waveform produced smaller values on the 3 orders of magnitude.

  Lynn