BBM SDKS and code signing

Similar Questions

• ApplicationManager and code signing

  I'm calling a MDS application from a java application. I had to order the keys and have signed the application, but I always get an error no matter where I try to call ApplicationManager.

   ApplicationManger.getApplicationManager().launch(TheMDSApp);
  

  I get a "Cannot find symbol' pointing to ApplicationManager.

  I made the Declaration of import at the top of my code.

  import net.rim.device.api.system.ApplicationManager;
  

  Do you guys know what Miss me?

  Rebooted and it works. No idea, but thank you.

• 1.1 update and Code signing

  Well, I had a time getting my upgrade to work.  The entire thread is here.  It seems that my correspondents gave a solution, so I just reinstalled everything from scratch (Eclipse 3.5 with Blackberry plugins).

  This time, when I went to import the files (window-> Preferences-> Blackberry Java Plugin-> Signature tool) code signing, I chose the directory, and he said, ' key Signature files is not found.  This is the directory with the files in it .csi, and they are there.  So, why can't you find them?  Is this another directory, it needs?

  Answered my own question: no, it looks for the .csk file, I found and import * said * TI completed successfully.  So we'll just see how the project is going...

• JDE and code signing of device vs. Simulator...

  I have a test application which is just a very simple application which is a screen with a button above. I click the button and change the background color of the screen. This works very well in the Simulator. Now, I have 2 versions of this code. A version that is running on the real device and another version does not work on the physical device (although on the Simulator).

  The only difference between the applications is as follows. On the dysfunctional version, I used involved objects code signing, but then later removed this code by commenting out. After that, the app seems does not not in the unit. I did a full clean and rebuild of all, but it doesn't seem to make a difference. It's almost like the links in the application of something because of the requirement that is not removed after signing of code condition code is removed... and this is the stop of modified versions of this code to run on the device until I have reset something in the JDE code signing.

  Ideas for what something might be?

  Thank you

  -Donald

  I SOLVED IT!

  When I removed some resource files I had used when test resources (but used is no longer), the problem disappeared. I'm in a com/rim/samples directory structure... I guess the resources was my problem and nothing to do with the directory.

  On further review, resource files use a package command, so everyone the reading of this... Don't forget NOT TO CHANGE THE order of the package in your resource files too.

  Thanks for any input... I love javaloader.exe...

  -Donald

• Create the certificate and Code signing

  Hi all

  I'm still a little confused on the operation of the certificate and the sign Code.

  First I used Flash Builder Burrito to create my certificate and I choose my file syc. After that, I got an email from RIM saying that my registration has been completed. After that, I realized that the certificate I created has a different name than I used to ask my sign code. When I created a new graduate with the right name, I could associate the core sign in my new certificate and get this error

  

  When I tried to sign my application via command line, I've got it successfully: "Bar signed."

  Does anyone know why I get this error message, and if the command line worked really. can I use different certificate with a sign code?

  Thank you very much

  Hey arthur,.

  the rule is that if you mess up the record in some way, it is best to ask a new set of signature keys. You can not reinstated a key already registered. also, I saw that you use Flash Builder to make the entry to the registry. Although I've seen this work, I recommend that do the actual packing and signature via command line. Good luck!

• App packaging and Code-signing (Flash Builder Burrito)

  Hi guys,.

  I would like to know if the function "export version Release" (the tab Flash Builder project in the top menu) does not work correctly or if I should use the command line for the packaging. I see that my .bar includes the META-INF / "MANIFEST. MF' it's supposed to get generated only after the signature of the app.

  Thank you

  Hi daniel,.

  Yes, you should always use the tools of command line to package and sign your applications. There is a bug in the IDE that prevents it to properly sign the app here is a thread that can help you with the signature of the command line:

  http://supportforums.BlackBerry.com/T5/Tablet-OS-SDK-for-Adobe-Air/useful-tip-package-images-via-com...

  Good luck!

• Orientation of the storm and code signing

  is it possible to change the orientation of the screen of the storm without using the API signed?

  Yes, turn on the phone.

  OK in a sense non-joking, if you're talking about defining what directions are allowed, you need key for use UiEngineInstance.setAcceptableDirections of signature.

  You need it for the view class, but you can get the values themselves, so that you don't need to actually use the class, thus avoiding the requirement of signing key.

• How to record the code signing keys

  Hi I'm luis

  I'm trying to register, but I got an error

  In Eclipse the BlackBerry SDK tools Carpet > Bar signatory.

  does not appear.

  I use the eclipse plugin

  Thank you.

  http://supportforums.BlackBerry.com/T5/testing-and-deployment/BlackBerry-applications-and-code-SIGNI...

  Please click on solved if it helps.

  Thank you

• Updating JRE 7 45 and JAR signing mess

  I'm at my wits end with Java.  Ask for assistance with a person who has done this successfully, especially with the cards to chip/PKCS11.  My problem is that no matter how I sign the deploymentruleset.jar, my test sites, I'm going to continue to get the warning pop up with "the certifica is not valid and cannot be used to verify the identity of the Web site" as well as "this request will be blocked in a future update of security Java because the manifest files JAR does not contain the permissions attribute."  I changed my ruleset.xml a billion times, even try to whitelist as a last resort for at least check if it is reading the file, but nothing helped.  All of this seems to come from the way in which the JAR file is signed.

  The documentation for java that I see is basically stating as, 'oh, just go buy a certificate.  For many of us, this isn't an option, and we are forced to rely on our internal case.  In addition, you need a certificate for code signing to do this, so I I was handed a certificate based on the chips for this, which forced me to invoke - stores ZERO and all that jazz.  So I have provided a certificate based on the chips to run the task.  After a long and brutal journey, I was finally able to sign without getting "the certificate of the signer chain is not validated.  Now, it seems validated.  It was a week in the process.  It was downloading and adding certificates into the cacerts keystore.  It was after another brutal trip, trying to figure out how to read my card chip with ActivClient, then another trip brutal trying to read a secondary card reader (slot = 1 must be added to the cfg file).  Yes, I modify the security attributes (and others) a million different ways and test.  Same result.

  So now, no matter what I do, the sites I have test on do not feel that the jar file is a certificate chain.  Yes, I added the item to the white list, and after I proceed after the warning, told me so I can't continue "Blocked by deployment Application rule set" because "Cannot verify the self-signed deployment rule POT Set".  Several variations of the test site (including wildcard characters) are in the ruleset.xml.  The ruleset.xml displays correctly when in the Java Control Panel console.

  Why it has become ridiculously difficult for anyone to deploy it?  I get security, but if you can't document correctly different methods to do this, with traps and the FAQ, it is rather useless.  Before you point me to a document Oracle, rest assured, I read all of them.

  Has anyone out there successfully done this with a cert a code of a CA signing token-based internal?  What is an obligation to buy a cert based on external files for this?

  Thank you

  Nate

  A member of my team was able to identify a step that missed me.  I wrote a 20 step guide on how to do it, but the forums won't let me copy and paste.  Let me give you a few highlights...

  (1) If you have ActivClient, you need to add a line of code at the end of the java.security file, but also to create a file cfg somewhere on your machine and point the java.security file cfg code.

  Line at the end of the java.security file... "#configuration for security omitted 1.6 security.provider.7 sun.security.pkcs11.SunPKCS11 c:/temp/pkcs11.cfg = providers (or what you call the cfg).

  Inside the cfg file, you must specify the location of your ActiveClient acpkcs211.dll.  If you use a secondary smart card reader, you must also specify the location = 1 at the end of the cfg file.

  name = ActivCard

  Library = c:\program files\actividentity\activclient\acpkcs211.dll

  location = 1

  (2) create the ruleset.xml according to your needs

  (3) create a file named security.txt and place "permissions: all-permissons ' on line 1 and ' codebase: *" on line 2.

  (4) copy the two files above to the JDK\bin

  (5) your certificates root export to an x.509 .cer file.

  (6) to export the file RECs certificate of Internet Explorer (it was a step that I missed) code signing.

  (7) import the code signing certificate in your trusted root certificates (it was a step that I missed).

  (8) import your root certificates and signature of the certs (cer files) into the code cacerts file.  (I missed the part of code signing cert)

  For example

  keytool - keystore "c:\program files\Java\jdk1.7.0_45\jre\lib\security\cacerts" - importcert-alias alias rootcert.cer

  Repeat the steps for the other roots, middle and code signing cert

  (9) create the jar file

  (10) find the alias of the certificate code using keytool - keystore NONE - stores PKCS11-list - v

  (11) sign the jar file with the code inserted into a smart card reader, using the alias from above as the last parameter of the token-signing certificate

  jarsigner - keystore NONE - PKCS - signedjar alias DeploymentRuleSet.jar DeploymentRuleset.jar stores

  (12) copy the jar signed at c:\windows\sun\java\deployment

  (13) check the ruleset works by checking Java in the control panel

  (14) to test your Web site

• BBM SDK - dependency Checker - proxy package and app together

  Hey guys,.

  I'm looking to implement the auditor BBM SDK dependency as defined in http://us.blackberry.com/developers/blackberrymessenger/ . The main idea is to run a proxy application to verify that the user has BBM6 and basically have open your application. This works well for me in the simulators and debugging on a device, like I can deploy both projects at the same time.

  My question is, when I want to communicate that to App World in itself, how could I go on these two projects into one package so that users would just download an app to launch my application?

  Thank you

  Riley

  To do this, you will need to do as Ebscer said and unzip all the cod in a single folder and zip, save them in a cod/zip file. Update the jad file to contain two cod that you can use the updateJad tool that is packed with the JDE.

• Need codes of the SDK and sample

  I am in need of SDK and enjoy codes to connect my printer HP Deskjet 3525 of my own app (Android). Any help on your side?

  Hi Claudine,

  I suggest that ask you your question on The Forums Android. HP supports printing from Cloud Print, Eprint, and a few others, but we wouldn't support options for an application that you created. Perhaps you could contact the assistance platform company. For example, if you used maker apps to store , you could contact them.

  Good luck.

• Process * \MCSHIELD. EXE the nest (428) contained code signed or corrupted and could not perform an operation with a McAfee driver.

  XP SP3 system

  I get warnings like this when Mcafee updates.

  Process * \MCSHIELD. EXE the nest (428) contained code signed or corrupted and could not perform an operation with a McAfee driver.

  Process * \SVCHOST. EXE the nest (1632) contained code signed or corrupted and could not perform an operation with a McAfee driver.

  Is this a problem Microsoft or Mcafee?

  Do I need to fix?

  In the McAfee forums, there are several similar positions such as:

  https://community.McAfee.com/message/241542

  I'll sue your question on in their community, as they already seem to know about it.

  I would also say that, unless you are very fond of McAfee or you are forced to use it, you plan to replace it with something that has a smaller footprint, uses less resources and doesn't have these problems - something like Microsoft Security Essentials, you can get here:

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/Security-Essentials-download

  MSE completed with the free version of MBAM and SAS should permanently keep your clean enough unless you're a daredevil like me:

  Download, install, update and do a quick scan with these free malware detection programs (not at the same time) and remove all threats:

  Malwarebytes (MMFA): http://www.malwarebytes.org/products/malwarebytes_free
  SUPERAntiSpyware: (SAS): http://www.superantispyware.com/

  SAS will probably report a lot of tracking cookies and you can just let him delete them.

  Even if you keep McAfee, I always supplement it with MBAM and SAS since no single AV program does seem to know everything.  If your McAfee of your system is clean, I would interpret that means - McAfee found nothing, says he knows.  It is prudent to use more than a reputable scanner to get more coverage.

  If you choose to spend (and you can't have both at the same time), you must be sure to use the uninstaller that you can get from here:

  http://service.McAfee.com/FAQDocument.aspx?LC=1033&ID=TS101331

  Your system will give you better performance.

• Problem with WebInspector: error: Code signing request failed car-development-Application Mode in the East of the demo is present and is not set [false].

  Hi, I have a problem running the webinspector on my dev alpha.

  Whenever I have create bar folder with the d flag, and then run the signature tool, I got the error message:

  Error: Code signing of the petition failed because Application-Development-Mode demo
  is is present and not set [false].

  How to solve this problem? If I generate the .bar without the flag - d, can I sign and execute on the device, but without web Inspector

  I found the error

  I just had to use the indicator g in bbwp and set my password

  and not reuse bbwp and then the signing tool

• BBM SDK Beta sign problem/question

  Since no rim responded to my post in the JAVA forum

  When and how RIM is going out the key signature for BBM applications?

  now BBM apps can't run on the sim card.

  I replied to the other thread (PLU) here: http://supportforums.blackberry.com/t5/Java-Development/MSohm-How-do-we-sign-BBM-apps-and-how-to-reg...

• Distribution of Code Signing and OTA

  I'm developing an application that uses APIs that require code signing. I received my key, installed and used the tool in the code signing eclipse plugin to sign my application.  I can install the application via the desktop tools and I normally see a prompt "Do you want to grant the status of trusted application xxx" when I run the application.  Everything is fine after that.  Now the question I want to distribute the application on the web within my company.  I have other applications are implemented in this way, for distribution to work, but when I run the application, I get the error "xxx uses a secure API", indicating that it has not been code signed.  I copy my files .cod files .jad, etc. on the server of web/results expected / / in my eclipse solution.  The web, do not exit is signed?  Is there a way to force the eclipse plugin to sign the web output or you can do it manually?  Any other reason, it would not work?

  It turns out that our Web server was actually used older versions of files that were not properly signed.  We were storing the .cod files in a database and someone wrote the wrong application, basically.