Best Config for readers

I feel like I'm a freshman again, and yet I develop my own game edition. Clearly a lack of understanding, which leads to my ignorance I/O stock. I heard it suggested to use RAID 0 for a fixed return for 8 or 12 GB file, cache of media, previews and rendering files. And this same person suggested a single drive for the media. Four questions: 1: when I play back, say, a split quad in real-time with the MEP, am I not taxing media player for most of flow? RAID 0 is imposed at all, being that I do not use rendered files? 2 when reading a timeline made, is not the layer essentially a stream of data, since all the layers are made to one, so I think this might be the only drive... 3. What is the difference between previews and rendering files? I always thought they were synonymous. 4. What is media cache and what is requirements such as I/O? Should it get its own player or can she shared with another stream of data? Please note that when I say "I think that" it is ignorance that makes me think this way and that's why I'm asking someone who clearly understands the data stream. I apologize in advance if any of you are yourself repeating for the 13, 000th times the other messages that I have not read, but I bet that a plethora of other participants in the Forum will receive responses to these 4 questions answered together. Send streams of media bad readers or in conjunction with other data streams which should not be shared on the same drive can be a major bottleneck. Maybe you can list your drive configuration and you have been delegated to each disk. Since I was the one asking for help, I promise not to punish for the answer you give! (Actually I wouldn't punish you if you were the one request seeking help...)

Felix,

Start with the fact that sequential reading is the fastest method of getting data on a disk. Random writing is the slowest to get data on a disk, with sequential write then.

When rendering a chronology, with lots of small files, this difinitely is written, but in some cases may be closer to randiom written, only sequential, depending on the length of transitions and effects.

During the purification through a chronology, it is read once according to the length of yellow or green areas in the chronology is a sequential read for yellow and can approach random playback for melted areas.

Each situation must be considered in relation to the number of available disks and the planned RAID. With a raid0 of two discs, the risk of data loss is twice higher than a single disk. What data do not really count, is that they lost, well, that is data that are easily re-created, as the file exchange and rendered files, so it is perfect feeling, due to the nature of access to these data in a stream of edition and an aspect of security, use them on a raid0.

Multimedia files, including with tapeless processes, would often disastrous to lose. In a workflow tapebased may resume, but not in a tapeless workflow, so data security is much more important and must for that reason alone not endangered on a raid0.

If there are a limited number of records, let's say only 3, outside the OS disc, often even better is no raid at all, but use them as a single Disk. The situation changes when you have, say 5 discs. Then a 5 drive raid5 may be the more attractive option.

See my response makes you referring, in the light of your question, ask which of the two options was the best!

Preview/render was used because some people speak only files render, others on the preview files, but they are one and the same.

I realize that my disk configuration is rather rare, but this is my setup:

C: OS and programs, Velociraptor

D: Pagefile, temporary files, cache of media, various, 2 x 1 TB raid0

E: projects, media, make files, 12 x 1 TB raid30

A: Stock images and audio, 1 TB

B: exports, 1 TB

Hope this explains a bit and no problem to ask.

Tags: Premiere

Similar Questions

BEST CONFIG FOR EDITING

Hello I have adobe first CC with the imac, pegasus RAID 4 and external SSD 512 GB of hardrive. What is the best performance config for: media temp files, rush, application?
Thank you

Read all the articles to the Page Tweakers

Best config for uplink for VSphere

Hi all
I recently bought two Dell R710 with NIC 8 + 2 x 520 FPS + iSCSI traffic.
I designed the following config: (excluding the iSCSI)
* 1 liaison rising vmkernel-management
* 1 liaison rising vmotion vmkernel
* 2 liaison rising vmkernel-nfs
* 4 uplink for the VM network
As the storage solution is mixed with iSCSI + NFS, we wanted to provide a high resilience to the backend NFS with two uplinks dedicated.
In addition, vmotion, management and nfs services are in different VLANS in a stack of Catalyst 3750.
Management interfaces are configured in the cisco access mode, so without trunk vlan exists in any interface.
My problem is the NFS traffic is travelling through the uplink of management:-$...
Would be a good idea to join all the rising management (nfs, vmotion, mgmt) in a vswitch and configure an lacp in cisco devices to provide resilience and balance the vmkernel services? Or it is preferable to maintain the current design?
Of course, any other ideas are welcome.
Thanks in advance.
Julio

LACP would be the way to go, because you also need the traffic for vmware kernel FT.

Best Config for the new MBP 13 "retina? (decide between the RAM and the space... i7 also confirmation is worth)

I'm in the market for a new MBP 13 "retina and I have a few questions about where max out of the unit.

What I have... I currently have a renovated MBP 13 "retina, end 2012, 2.9 GHz, 8 GB to 128 GB of storage. I was especially pleased with this machine. I love the SSD and the quick start. The only regions that in deca for me were video compression and storage of physical disk speed. I currently have about 30 GB HD free space, but it's because I'm a Spartan and store essential files only on the MBP. Without a doubt, I want to double my storage on the following I buy (at least it will give it more leeway to work properly).

What I do for a living... I am a writer and also a vlogger. I opted for the i7 chip because video compression is painful on the cell current, particularly H264. I use MS Word, Photoshop, Quicktime Pro and compression software to take videos and convert raw. MOV H264. So my core processing tasks, record audio/video and audio/video compression. I turn on photoshop work.

What I would like to get...
- MacBook Pro 13 inch with Retina display
- 3.1GHz dual - core Intel Core i7, Turbo Boost up to 3.4 GHz
- Intel Iris 6100 graphics card
- 8 GB RAM
- 256 GB HD
My Questions:
1. It is better to push either the HD or RAM, up to 16 GB or 512 GB, respectively? I can't afford both. Or does save $200. (I upgraded in general on 3-year cycles)
2. I guess that the i7 will help with the compression of various media or export tasks I have? Usually, I have to record videos using the internal camera and then export it into a format more suitable for delivery. Same with the audio (except that I capture with a blue Yeti MIC). Basically, I want to just speed up export jobs and compression. To do this, I guess the i7 and turbo boost will shine?
Just curious if anyone has any advice... I would like to purchase today. Thank you! I'm leaning towards i7 with 256 SSD and 8 GB of RAM. Since I already have an i7 on my 2012 model, descending into the processor speed is not really sense (2.9-2.7). Nor do the same (2.9 to 2.9). I'd love to 16 GB of RAM, but it pushes the machine to near $2 K.

Best disk for my nice new laptop Asus ROG Configuration

Hey everybody!
I just bought an ASUS ROG G752VT-GC046D (German Web site link), which has a 1 to 7200 RPM HARD drive. The computer has two empty 2280 m2 slots for disks SSD NVMe. I wonder what is the best configuration of disk while keeping my low costs? I do 1080 p video editing in Premiere Pro (30 FPS and 60 fps) and do a job after effects. I hope that the 4K video editing will be possible on this machine. But 4K is not a must, I would like to keep in mind when selecting disks.

Data sheet:
I7-6700HQ
GTX 970M 3 GB GDDR
16 GB DDR4 (2 of 4)
FHD LED 17.3 "display
Maniboard: Intel CM236 (Skylake PCH - H) (im not sure at 100%, I found this on another website for G752VT)
3 x USB 3
1 x USB 3.1 / Thunderbolt
1000 GB 7200 RPM HARD drive
2 empty slots for disks SSD NVMe M.2
Discs cannot be configured in RAID
I have a 250 GB SSD 850 EVO in my old computer I can use (currently I use only this disk to edit). Speed reading and writing od 540 MB/s and 520 MB/s, respectively
Configuration 1
1 drive: operating system, programs, Pagefile - 128 GB SSD PM951 NVMe M.2 2280 = €65
2 disc: media, projects - 1 TB 7200 RPM 2.5 "HARD disc
3 disc: overview, media Cache, exports: 256 GB SSD PM951 NVMe M.2 2280 = €145
250 GB SSD 2.5 "or sold laying around EVO 850
Investment = €210
Configuration 2
1 drive: operating system, programs, Pagefile - 128 GB SSD PM951 NVMe M.2 2280 = €65
2 disc: media, projects - 250 GB EVO 850 SSD 2.5 "(slower than PM951) SATA connectors"
3 disc: overview, media Cache, exports: 256 GB SSD PM951 NVMe M.2 2280 = €145
4 disc: backups & old projects - 1 TB 7200 RPM 2.5 "HARD disc
Investment = 210€
I read the Page Tweakers on the configuration of the hard drive, but I don't know how to apply the knowledge practically while keeping in mind that I am not a super pro user with a huge budget but rather someone who wants to get better, but has a limited budget.
What are your thoughts on my Configurations, do you recommend improvements? Is the Configuration 2 the best bang for the buck (or euro)?
Looking forward to your answers.
Best,
Gorazd

If you already have the evo 250 GB and you want to use into the laptop

Disc 1-250 GB samsung 850 evo = os/apps/pagefile/db cache

Disc 2-512 GB samsung 950 pro = project/media/previews

Disc 3-1 TB 7200 RPM hard drive = enclosure external usb for backups

So just buy a disc, the samsung 950 pro and a box external usb 3 for the 1 TB hard drive.

If you want to keep the internal 1 TB drive, then I think you have to go with two readers of m2. a pm951 of 128 GB or a little better sm951 for os/apps can work.

Skylake was almost a flop for the gain in performance over the last generation cpu. If new portable computers skylake are good for features such as Thunderbolt, which is good for the expansion or upgrades, including egpu.

DPS: Judge to use the parameter Raster or vector in the States of the objects when the majority of the page is a photo. What is the best setting for the overall performance?

I am trying to decide whether to use the parameter Raster or vector in the States of the object when the majority of the screen is a picture (with a modest but important legend for children to read). The legend certainly makes it look more net as vector. But does the photo! The raster setting seems to make the lower-res images in comparison. In my first edition of my application, I thought that raster would be the best setting when the photo was the subject dominating the page. But now, after seeing how strong he looks like vector, (but with almost a refresh of the unacceptable time. Perhaps better on the latest iPad. Most of my readers/students in class will use iPad 2 s, which has a slower processor). I wonder if I should go through the trouble of changing States of photo objects that have the type as well to the vector. It doesn't seem to be as sensitive to a re - draw on the iPad 2 (non-retine)
Is Filesize hit if I make about 1200 on these objects range from Raster to vector? (It is a huge, highly interactive history book, so I'm curious if acutally go to vector on these photos would reduce the size of the file) What is the best setting for the overall performance?
I see the freeks screen outside for a bit if you try to pinch and zoom in a vector object (photo) vs raster. Which is disappointing. Does slow down load time/refreshment in frame, which is a little less. I also found that the drop shadows really bad that redraws effect in vector, almost vibrating in a slide show, for example. Thus, in cases where I need shadows, I'm sticking with Raster.
All tips go ahead?
Brian

Does that help? http://boblevine.us/Digital-Publishing-Suite-101-keep-text-sharp-in-raster-slideshows/

vSpere 5 Networking of best practices for the use of 4 to 1 GB NIC?

Hello
I'm looking for a networking of best practices for the use of 4-1 GB NIC with vSphere 5. I know there are a lot of good practice using 10 GB, but our current config does support only 1 GB. I need to include the management, vMotion, Virtual Machine (VM) and iSCSi. If there are others you would recommend, please let me know.
I found a diagram that resembles what I need, but it's for 10 GB. I think it works...
(I had this pattern HERE - rights go to Paul Kelly)
My next question is how much of a traffic load is each object take through the network, percentage wise?
For example, 'Management' is very small and the only time where it is in use is during the installation of the agent. Then it uses 70%.
I need the percentage of bandwidth, if possible.
If anyone out there can help me, that would be so awesome.
Thank you!
-Erich

Without knowing your environment, it would be impossible to give you an idea of the uses of bandwidth.

That said if you had about 10-15 virtual machines per host with this configuration, you should be fine.

Sent from my iPhone

Dell PE 2850 Raid config for ESXi4

We have a few spare Dell PE 2850 and will be installing ESXi 4. I was wondering what would be the best config. RAID 1 for the 2 first discs and then raid 5 for the rest of the raid just 5 all the way together.
Thank you

Out of these two options, it is greatly preferable to use one large set.

However, performance will be better with a RAID-10 set. Anyway, the controller must have a pile of work on the PERC.

Please give points for any helpful answer.

What is the best OS for a late 2008?

What is the best OS for a late 2008?

El Capitan. He will run the latest apps and have the latest safety features.

Do not install the maximum RAM that your model will accept (best sources RAM compatible Macs are OWC and Crucial). If the bank account is fat, install an SSD (Crucial and OWC SSD are recommended).

Ciao.

Best OS for a MacbookPro, end of 2008?

What is the best OS for a MacbookPro, end of 2008?

It depends on your use.

For OSX 1088 and earlier browsers are is more updated to fix security vulnerabilities

The onver of Mavericks and later versions are still.

You Mac can run and including El Capitan, but not of Sierra.

Mavericks, Yosemite and El Capitan is not in the Mac App Store. If you previously download them you can always redownload them via the purchase of the Mac App Store

You can buy codes to download for Lion and Mountain Lion

What is the best monitor for the MacBook Pro?

I want to get a 27 "monitor for my macbook Pro for my degree. Which is the best alternative for the thunderbolt display, as it is incredibly expensive. Thank you guys

I prefer Samsung, and I deployed samsung monitors to dozens of designers who I support (27 "), but almost all of them use the same components of the same factories.

What is the best SSD for a mid 2010 17 "macbook pro?

What is the best SSD for a mid 2010 17 "macbook pro?

It depends of what your budget and how much Go looking

Best material for editing?

I want to upgrade my computer to edit it. I have an iMac 2011: 2,5 GHz, memory 4 GB, AMD Radeon HD 6750 M 512 MB. I plan to buy another iMac. with a budget of $2500, what would you recommend for best performance for editing? I would emphasise quality video card, memory RAM, or disk (4 cores, 7 carrots, fusion, etc...)?

Download video card with MOST of the vRAM. That means generally that you will also get the quad core i7 with Turbo Boost technology (acts like one 8 cores when you need it - and presents itself as 8 cores with MenuMeters.) The 2013 iMac had a 'backdoor' easily add RAM, and if this is always the case - buy an extra set of 16G of Crucial or some other 3rd party and add it yourself - you will make savings (if I remember) about $200. If I had to start everything, I would have also obtained the reader of the merger, but the internal (regular) hard drive in the iMac Gets a pretty decent read/write speed (about 130 MB/s) but not what you really want with video editing. The proposed internal SSD is fairly low, so, I generally recommend external SSD drives and their construction schedules. USB3 is fast. Love at first sight would be better, but it's still expensive. An SSD in USB3 is quite impressive (I get about 300-400 MB/s R/W for one and 370-435 on the other). You can get a USB3 box for $10-$40 (Amazon has a housing Kdlinks now, limited time, for only $9.95!) and you can find a 500 GB SSD for under $ 200 these days. I bought Crucial SSD (I have a little bit o 'too o' Scottish blood in me), but what I've read, the Samsung EVOs are among the fastest (~500MB/s).

-VRAM so Max it is possible! (- what it takes to get this top of the line card... graphics you have it.) - and lotsa RAM (you can buy 8 with mac + 16 crucial for 24 which will give respectable service) - fast external drives are a nice addition.

What is the best OS for Macbook pro 13.3 mid-2010

What is the best OS for Macbook pro 13.3 mid-2010.

I am currently using OS X El captian and it's extremelly slow. Please tell us which is the best OS for her to be able to function properly.

Thank you very much

specifications:

2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo

4 GB 1067 MHz DDR3

NVIDIA GeForce 320M 256 MB

The Snow Leopard is one of the more stable OS Ive ever used, but you won't have a lot of features. Mavericks is in the Middle, has more features and is always quite stable. I would, however, try to reinstall El Capitan, or deleting some files to free up space.

See you soon,.

Adam

Why is the best security for my new laptop Mac and is it necessary?

What is the best security for my mobile Mac download and is it necessary?

None, other than integrated security.

Best Config for readers

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for