Best quality Export format

Similar Questions

• iMovie 10.1 How do I export a project in the best quality

  When I right click on a movie theatre it is not possible to "get info" to see what size it is, that is of quality. So I have to copy it to the desktop computer for "get info. In my view, there a lot less bytes project finalized before it is actually exported at the theatre.

  Is it possible to export the project in its original full quality lossless on my hard drive somewhere so that I can create a library of best quality movies?

  You can adjust the quality if you share the file and check the box if you want to add to the theatre.  Here's a movie 1080 p in full size:

  Geoff.

• Almost without loss best export formats?

  Hello

  I need to provide a ProRes format file to a place that shows my work. I don't have a Mac, but they offered us convert a file that I can export to FCP.

  I wonder what will be the best exports almost without loss for this? I considered Cineform but it's a video of m 87 and I imagine that the file size will be huge.

  Any suggestions on the best almost lossless formats whose size is low which should work with FCP would be very appreciated.

  Thank you!

  Size of the file without loss and low are usually mutually exclusive.

  You asked this question 8 days ago and he said Cineform/ProRes

• can I convert a pdf file in Greek in word with adobe pdf export format?

  Hello, how can I convert a pdf file in Greek in word with adobe pdf export format?

  Hi Benjamin,

  Greek is not one of the languages supported for OCR by ExportPDF, but it is in Acrobat. You can try Acrobat for free for 30 days, if you wish. See www.adobe.com/products/acrobat.html for more information.

  Best,

  TA5

• SOUL vs Direct Export in first CS5 - bad quality export flash

  Hello

  I recently met some discrepancies of quality strange export to FLV with SOUL and the direct export of first CS5. Material of origin was DV PAL (4:3). Export the flash settings are 430 x 314, 25 fps, 2000MiB/s, Codec: On2VP6. Hardware acclerated MPE.

  Export with the SOUL led to strong pixelated text animations (made with the title tool). Direct export had a lot of best quality results. The exports were made with the same settings.

  D I would like to know if anyone has similar kind problems when encoding with the AME or have some suggestions, how this quality gap could happen?

  Thanks for your comments.

  In this case, you are probably looking for the difference between the hardware acceleration (direct) and is not accelerated (SOUL).  The first has higher scaling algorithms.

• Best quality for streaming

  I have a few quality filmed, at 1920 x 1080. I want to encode a WMV or FLV file and resize it at 550 px horizontal, vertical 309. I get to these dimensions by dragging one of the two dimensions in the verified with forced SOUL. When I try to save this profile, I get an error message that it is an invalid image size. It seems that the dimensions must be integers, is that correct?

  Secondly, I started with the preset of Windows Media, then selected one of the subsidiary presets on NTSC. In each case, the resulting video is poster, as if working with a different color palette.

  I am trying to get to the image size and format that will give me for streaming high quality and who will not need to be re-resized when I embed into a web page.

  What is the best way for me to do this?

  Joe Parsons

  The encoding algorithms used do best when using multiples of 16. It is the most effective and gives you the best quality. To get more close to your original size, you can use 544 x 306. That will be much easier on the coding work better and faster. In comparison with the size of the original, the differences are minimal. hard to notice.

• 5520, I don't have the best quality on the predefined menu print option.

  Hello, please can help you. I don't have a BEST QUALITY printing on the options menu. I can only print fast draft or quick project black and white as shown below. Please advise, thank you.

  Hey there @lh39!

  I should be able to provide assistance on creating a new preset!

  Looking at the screenshot your provided it seams like you're very limited to the print settings.  I would recommend open TextEdit on the Mac computer.  TextEdit is located in the application folder.  The only reason why I recommend the use of text edit is just to create the new printer preset for optimal quality.  Once you have TextEdit open go to file and click on print.  You should get a preview window before printing.

  Please follow the steps:

  1. click on "Show details" if it does not say "hide details".

  2. choose "paper Type and quality.

  3. change the quality of 'best '.

  4. click on the drop down preset menu

  5. click on "Save current setting as a preset.

  6. type your name of preses (E.g. best quality)

  7. click on OK and reset your is now registered

  

  

  

  

  When you have finished creating the preset, you should be able to open your original print job and choose your new preset!

  Let me know how it goes and thanks again for the display on the HP Forums!

• Workflow to ensure the best quality print files

  I have a number of birds in flight photos that do not whole screen. I want to crop the part of the image and print it.

  I want to complete the process in Lightroom cc, however the impression that I get on the web, is that Photoshop has tools higher resampling.

  What is the optimal workflow between Lightroom and Photoshop to get the best quality print file?

  I had to rate an image for printing several years ago and made some tests using Photoshop, Lightroom and some third-party software, resize possibly perfect.

  It turned out that Lightroom has produced the best picture, followed closely by Photoshop.

  The image produced by the third-party software maybe was a bit stronger than the others, but it seemed unnatural.

  You can easily test yourself - create images in the same dimensions in pixels of Lightroom and Photoshop, then compare them to view 100%. Photoshop you give several resampling options that produce slightly different results, try bicubic and bicubic smoother.

• Problem with the export format MXF OP 1A in after effects 2015

  I have a big problem, when I tried to export format MXF OP1a with XDCAMHA 50 PAL (4:2:2), that export us in our TV.

  I have a project of screening HDTV 1080 25, photo belowe setting parameters:

  

  But when I used to export format MXF OP1a (XDCAMHD 50 PAL (4:2:2)), came first this:

  

  WTF!

  When I clicked OK, problems biggin:

  

  Output modul said "Incompatibility of parameters", and when I click on yellow triangle warning arrive (photo at the top).

  WTF!

  I missed something. I did something wrong?

  Need help.

  This codec, XDCAM 50 PAL is a non square HD codec and the size of the image is defined by the codec. If you choose XDCAM EX you can get the square pixels, but you have a flow lower and 4:2:0 color. This is a limitation of the format XCCAM that you're stuck with.

  You can choose another format option. Most of them have predefined sizes. It just depends on what you're trying to deliver and to WHO. If it's for the broadcasters all have their own set of standards that should be followed.

• H.264 + Minnetonka export format over-codes for Dolby

  I noticed that it is only possible to select the surcode 5.1 Minnetonka in the export format "H.264 Blu - ray".

  However, I would use the export format "H.264" (because I want to use the 50 frames per second).

  Is it possible to use the 5.1 Minnetonka. SurCode in combination with this setting of 50 fps 'H.264 '?

  To the extent that I couldn't find it.

  Thank you.

  Set of multiplexing voice against zero, then in the tab audio select Dolby Digital, and over-codes.

• Export best quality

  I was wondering what the best codec, format, the etc. could be to export my videos. I don't really mind how long it would take to export anything, but if it helps I have a Canon eos mark ii c100. I'm looking for the best possible quality.

  Thank you!

  Just choose a preset in H.264 and adjust the settings.

• BEST QUALITY (SOUL OR DIRECT EXPORT)

  Hello

  What is the best method of exporting files for the best overall quality:

  I use both SD and HD formats

  for SD (Pal DVCAM 16 x 9)

  for HD (XDCAM EX)

  also if I have the maximum depth and make the maximum on IT, it will make a significant difference for images.

  for the moment I export to DVD MPEG-2,

  Baz

  Baz,

  Maximum neglect depth only if your source material was of 4:2:2 to start with or when you make a lot of seizure, but generally it is reasonable with BM and AJA cards, which support HD - SDI. AFAIK MPEG2 - dVD is only 8 bpc, so the only effect is to lengthen the encoding process.

  MRQ is very sensitive, if you use MPE hardware but software. Material MPE always uses a maximum quality and linear color, except for certain specific situations. If you use MRQ using MPE and there is no longer time encoding, these circumstances do not apply, but it does not hurt. If there is a lengthening of coding time with MPE, you can enjoy quality, for example with nested sequences.

• Export in best quality

  Hello

  I've recently set up a blog and I was wondering what export settings are the best to use for web content.

  After reading several explanations on JPEG and PNG, I was not a little further.
  So far, I exported all my RAW photos with Save as-> JPEG-> quality and finished with 12 MB sizes. Now, I've read, that the size of the image should not exceed 400-500 KB?

  
  Grateful for your help.

  
  Best,

  Bela

  I would keep the master psd file. Or if space is a consideration, flattened and save in PNG or Tiff. PNG using lossless compression and you can generate a jpeg of size of him as necessary. If you want to go with file > save as > Jpeg, keep it to 10. I doubt you will see a difference of 12 max.

  You don't want to resave JPEG files, they lose quality that way.

  Essentially if you think you re - use this image, keep copies of archives. With cheap storage as it is, a 1 TB external drive would be practical.

  Gene

• Best export Format?

  Hello

  I just finished to the top of charts for my video class. My teacher is their use in his latest video. I was just wondering, what should export these? It will be important and their use in Premiere Pro CS6. It must be of high quality, and the space is not a problem. I can't give it the sequence, this sequence has other things in there.

  Thank you

  Jack Reynolds

  Reynolds movies 2014

  ... I'm assuming that HDTV 1080 p...

  It's as good as any starting point.

  Select the frame rate that you have created the animation with and start with something around 25 Mb/s or maybe 30 MB/s using a 1-pass VBR.

  While import into Premiere Pro and see if you are satisfied with the fact that when you play it back. If it looks good, you are finished. If this isn't the case, then you can have to bump up the speed of transmission. In addition, you can shorten the distance of the keyframe down every 15 frames. Or less.

  Experiment with the distance of the keyframe. The shorter the better I think, but it depends on the needs of the animation.

• Opportunity to get a quality export on long format?

  I finally finished a lengthy project, weighing in at 2 hours, 10 minutes in total length.  It is too long to fit on a DVD at my rate of normal quality; someone at - it suggestions on how to get maximum quality out of it and still fit on a SL DVD?

  I want to be forced to a flow of ~3.5 Mbps to fit on a DVD and it is simply not enough to keep the quality up to suit me.  Is it possible to improve on that and still deliver the customer on a single standard DVD program?  Normally I would it spread over two DVD but insistent client on a single and that he's paying for it and paying for 200...

  Unfortunately shorten the project a significant amount is not convenient... it is a highlights reel, which more than 500 winners & reserve and I can't cut a lot more runs than they already are and while leaving aside is not an option.  I do not shave more than 10 minutes or more and who would get into lots of set-up times more than the client does not want to pay for.

  DynamicLink allows you to support your project in Encore, and then set again to use the SOUL for transcoding. Still automatically uses SOUL (the best rendering engine) to get the best possible rate for the length of the sequences on the particular drive that you are handling. Takes all the math and guess out of it...