BEST QUALITY (SOUL OR DIRECT EXPORT)

Similar Questions

• SOUL vs Direct Export in first CS5 - bad quality export flash

  Hello

  I recently met some discrepancies of quality strange export to FLV with SOUL and the direct export of first CS5. Material of origin was DV PAL (4:3). Export the flash settings are 430 x 314, 25 fps, 2000MiB/s, Codec: On2VP6. Hardware acclerated MPE.

  Export with the SOUL led to strong pixelated text animations (made with the title tool). Direct export had a lot of best quality results. The exports were made with the same settings.

  D I would like to know if anyone has similar kind problems when encoding with the AME or have some suggestions, how this quality gap could happen?

  Thanks for your comments.

  In this case, you are probably looking for the difference between the hardware acceleration (direct) and is not accelerated (SOUL).  The first has higher scaling algorithms.

• iMovie 10.1 How do I export a project in the best quality

  When I right click on a movie theatre it is not possible to "get info" to see what size it is, that is of quality. So I have to copy it to the desktop computer for "get info. In my view, there a lot less bytes project finalized before it is actually exported at the theatre.

  Is it possible to export the project in its original full quality lossless on my hard drive somewhere so that I can create a library of best quality movies?

  You can adjust the quality if you share the file and check the box if you want to add to the theatre.  Here's a movie 1080 p in full size:

  Geoff.

• Best quality Export format

  Hi Experts,

  I'm working on the first Elements 10. I want to export the video in better quality. I'm going to play in Big TV video from a USB USB OR from YouTube, or through airtime or through DVD.

  But I see a lot of options to save video files. Example: "HDTV 1080 p 30 high quality" / "MPEG2 1920x1080i 30" / "Adobe Flash Video" etc. "."

  One who gives quality. I want to keep the video file best quality at all times.

  Thank you

  Anji

  TheAnji

  If your source video is 1920 x 1080 @ 29.97 progressive frames per second, so your 12 elements of first is not appropriate as defined by the program. You then define the predefined project manually to

  NTSC

  DIGITAL SLR

  1080 p

  DSLR 1080 p 30 @ 29.97

  As a side note, if your camera really saves 30 progressive frames per second and not 29.97 progressive frames per second, then the project preset for set is

  NTSC

  DIGITAL SLR

  1080 p

  DSLR 1800p 30

  Try to check this information in a test project, where you import the active project file, right click on the thumbnail, select interpret footage and see the section of the cadence of the dialog interpret the film.

  When it comes to exporting, please consider

  Publish + share

  Computer

  AVCHD

  with Presets = MP4 H.264 1920 x 1080 p 30

  (default values are suggested and should work, but they can be customized according to the advances of the tabs button and video and Audio if needed)

  You must download this file on YouTube on the web site YouTube.

  You can load your original content of timeline on YouTube since the first of 12 elements YouTube function, as much as he respects the requirements of 2 GB 15 minutes. Download YouTube extended agreements are obtained from YouTube and apply only to the YouTube video on the YouTube website not the functionality of Adobe.

  Adobe YouTube feature road would be

  Publish + share

  Social sites

  YouTube

  with the (non-adjustable) preset should be High Definition Video for YouTube 1920 x 1080

  What I've read, YouTube converts video in a flash (probably H.264.flv) file.

  https://support.Google.com/YouTube/answer/1722171?hl=en

  Please let us know if the information you are looking for and if it works for you.

  Thank you.

  RTA

• 10 x slower with media encode that Premiere pro direct export of rendering

  We use CS5 (use Adobe since 2004). I opened a sequence (published in first without length fantasy effect - it just open title & title closing - 4 minutes). It's HDV so nothing special or out of the ordinary.

  If I turn the sequence by clicking on FILE = > EXPORT = > MEDIA and export in this way it will take about 1 minute to make the file.

  If I close first and open Media Encoder and import the same sequence and return with exactly the same settings, it will take 10 or 11 minutes to render.

  I tried the most obvious areas such as closing all other programs and only opening media encoder, as well as ensure that the allocation of RAM is the same for media encode, but nothing seems to restore Media Encoder at the same speed.

  No matter what video format is on the entry or export... media encoding is always much slower.

  Why Media Encoder takes much longer to make?

  You have a CUDA card that can run hardware MPE?  You're upgrading scaling and deinterlacing of video on export?  You have a maximum quality made verified?

  If you answered Yes to all 3 questions, then this is the answer to your question.  SOUL CS5 uses the MPE software for certain operations (such as scaling and deinterlacing) even if the MPE material is available.  Direct export of the Pr use an MPE material for these same operations.

  -Jeff

• Best quality for streaming

  I have a few quality filmed, at 1920 x 1080. I want to encode a WMV or FLV file and resize it at 550 px horizontal, vertical 309. I get to these dimensions by dragging one of the two dimensions in the verified with forced SOUL. When I try to save this profile, I get an error message that it is an invalid image size. It seems that the dimensions must be integers, is that correct?

  Secondly, I started with the preset of Windows Media, then selected one of the subsidiary presets on NTSC. In each case, the resulting video is poster, as if working with a different color palette.

  I am trying to get to the image size and format that will give me for streaming high quality and who will not need to be re-resized when I embed into a web page.

  What is the best way for me to do this?

  Joe Parsons

  The encoding algorithms used do best when using multiples of 16. It is the most effective and gives you the best quality. To get more close to your original size, you can use 544 x 306. That will be much easier on the coding work better and faster. In comparison with the size of the original, the differences are minimal. hard to notice.

• 5520, I don't have the best quality on the predefined menu print option.

  Hello, please can help you. I don't have a BEST QUALITY printing on the options menu. I can only print fast draft or quick project black and white as shown below. Please advise, thank you.

  Hey there @lh39!

  I should be able to provide assistance on creating a new preset!

  Looking at the screenshot your provided it seams like you're very limited to the print settings.  I would recommend open TextEdit on the Mac computer.  TextEdit is located in the application folder.  The only reason why I recommend the use of text edit is just to create the new printer preset for optimal quality.  Once you have TextEdit open go to file and click on print.  You should get a preview window before printing.

  Please follow the steps:

  1. click on "Show details" if it does not say "hide details".

  2. choose "paper Type and quality.

  3. change the quality of 'best '.

  4. click on the drop down preset menu

  5. click on "Save current setting as a preset.

  6. type your name of preses (E.g. best quality)

  7. click on OK and reset your is now registered

  

  

  

  

  When you have finished creating the preset, you should be able to open your original print job and choose your new preset!

  Let me know how it goes and thanks again for the display on the HP Forums!

• Workflow to ensure the best quality print files

  I have a number of birds in flight photos that do not whole screen. I want to crop the part of the image and print it.

  I want to complete the process in Lightroom cc, however the impression that I get on the web, is that Photoshop has tools higher resampling.

  What is the optimal workflow between Lightroom and Photoshop to get the best quality print file?

  I had to rate an image for printing several years ago and made some tests using Photoshop, Lightroom and some third-party software, resize possibly perfect.

  It turned out that Lightroom has produced the best picture, followed closely by Photoshop.

  The image produced by the third-party software maybe was a bit stronger than the others, but it seemed unnatural.

  You can easily test yourself - create images in the same dimensions in pixels of Lightroom and Photoshop, then compare them to view 100%. Photoshop you give several resampling options that produce slightly different results, try bicubic and bicubic smoother.

• CS5 direct export to dvd

  I can't have a little chance direct export to DVD without going through yet. I export to media, I tried several selections but no selection of dvd release.

  Hello

  There is no way directly export a DVD of first. You have to use again.

  When you export a file from the dialog box export settings for use in DVD or Blu - ray Disc creation, select the right format for the middle of the target. For a single-layer or double-layer DVD, select MPEG2-DVD. For the Blu - ray single layer or double layer discs, select MPEG2 Blu - ray or H.264 Blu - ray.

  Thank you!
  Regalo

• What is the best way to import and export images from the 5 d Mark II?

  Hello

  I have just finished what I plan my first masterpiece of shooting film.  Shot on the Canon 5 d (1080 p, 24 fps), and the film looks amazing.  Now, I'm ready to start editing and now use creating lately, but I still have to figure out the proper conduct.  I want to know the best way to keep the resolution before I dive into this project.

  My questions:

  (1) what is the best way to start a new project and import the images without having to make while editing, in order to keep all the resolution and the originality of the source footage?

  (2) what is the best way / codec / format to export these images even once done editing to maintain than crisp 1080 p for which the 5 d is therefore counted?

  (3) what is the best way / codec / format for import and export / rendering between the first and after effects?  I speak especially of Visual effects and color correction.  I also a few sequences of 30 images per second that I intend to slow down in AE and then import into first.

  I know that it's wide enough, but as a solo Director I really need advice from someone.  Rarely, I finished my films with the same look crispy as images.  I need help of pipeline and really appreciate it!

  > used first lately

  A list of tutorial in the #3 http://forums.adobe.com/message/2276578 message

  1 - Please NOTE that the PPro CS6 screen may be a little different (I use CS5)

  For CS5 and later versions, the easy way to ensure that your video and your project

  See 2nd post for the photo of a NEW ELEMENT of process http://forums.adobe.com/thread/872666

  - and a FAQ on setting http://forums.adobe.com/message/3804341 sequence

  2 - BluRay... but I'm not sure if 1080 p is supported (I don't use of BluRay)

  1080 p http://forums.adobe.com/thread/995191 some work, some are not

  In addition, for upcoming posts, information FAQ http://forums.adobe.com/message/4200840

  In addition, read the metadata contained in the file http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1015001?tstart=0

  And finally, read Bill Hunt on http://forums.adobe.com/thread/919388?tstart=0 installation project

• Export best quality

  I was wondering what the best codec, format, the etc. could be to export my videos. I don't really mind how long it would take to export anything, but if it helps I have a Canon eos mark ii c100. I'm looking for the best possible quality.

  Thank you!

  Just choose a preset in H.264 and adjust the settings.

• Poor quality directly exported PDF Comp-projects

  Quality projects Comp PDF is very bad. When I export a project model directly in PDF format, the PDF file quality is very bad. Is it possible to finalise compositin in Comp CC like this or do I have to always send to Indesign, Illustrator etc. for finalisation?

  Hi jonasv and RyanMovie.

  Thank you very much for taking the time to share your comments. For now, Steve is right to recommend that you take your compositions in a desktop application. However, I will pass on this feedback on the team so that they are aware. If I find anything, I'll share with you.

  Let me know if you need anything else!

  -Kathleen

• Export in best quality

  Hello

  I've recently set up a blog and I was wondering what export settings are the best to use for web content.

  After reading several explanations on JPEG and PNG, I was not a little further.
  So far, I exported all my RAW photos with Save as-> JPEG-> quality and finished with 12 MB sizes. Now, I've read, that the size of the image should not exceed 400-500 KB?

  
  Grateful for your help.

  
  Best,

  Bela

  I would keep the master psd file. Or if space is a consideration, flattened and save in PNG or Tiff. PNG using lossless compression and you can generate a jpeg of size of him as necessary. If you want to go with file > save as > Jpeg, keep it to 10. I doubt you will see a difference of 12 max.

  You don't want to resave JPEG files, they lose quality that way.

  Essentially if you think you re - use this image, keep copies of archives. With cheap storage as it is, a 1 TB external drive would be practical.

  Gene

• How can I get the best quality when creating a DVD

  Hey everybody

  I really hope you can help because I'm more frustrated. That is the problem.

  Each month, we create a DVD with all the latest trailers on them playing in video stores.

  
  Here are the steps that we take

  1. download the trailer for quicktime 720 p on the web

  2. We then change the first Pro CC
  3. we add a graphic overlay (its a 1280 X 720, 72 dpi TIFF) I use the CC Photoshop preset for it
  4 export the project to the h.264 (.mp4) format (flow target 7.5, 7.5 maximum Bitrate, quality use Mailhot invalidate) it comes out beautiful in HD 720 p.

  Then we open again CS6

  1. start a new chronology

  2 import our .mp4 file
  3. define our transcoding. Now, here's the problem, I tried each preset. With custtominzing, our most recent has been...

  
  Then go us to the author of it. But when its done, it is so blurry you can't read text on the screen. Now, I know that DVD IS NOT HD, I get it, but it must always be readable? That's the best I can get? Here are a few screenshots (sorry I had to take with my camera to the DVD and you can see how blurry.)

  

  

  Any help would be appreciated as our client is really getting annoyed with the quality. Society before us used Premier Pro and still but it came out in a most pleasant way. Im just lost here.

  Export first as MPEG2-DVD. Or something without loss to export even if you have only a compression.

• How to download the best quality videos in dreamweaver

  Hello

  I'm trying to figure out what format and size I should convert my video 1080 x 720 to for import in DW. Owen

  1080 x 720... It is a strange aspect ratio... Well.

  For the best coded compression, use H.264 to create an mp4 file at a rate not to exceed the speed of download Internet connection the majority of your audience. If you are not familiar with the download speed, test your here:

  www.Speedtest.NET

  To examine the bitrate:

  Video bitrate

  One of the principle of goal setting is to "begin with the end in mind". In this case, it will be very difficult to give good recommendations because the end is not defined. So I'll just make a few assumptions and you can correct me if necessary.
  First, I'll assume that you convert Flash, whether you want to broadcast this video on the Internet. If that's true, then going to make some assumptions about your potential viewers Internet connection download speeds. Let's just say that most have at least a 1.5 MB connection or faster.
  OK, that would mean that a video bitrate of half that generally provide a video download that is not interupped by the buffering (most of the time anyway). So assuming a video bitrate of 750 kbps, what would be the optimal display size?
  Before decide us, here's a little info on the bitrate. To read more high quality, the bitrate of the video is directly related to the size of the screen. In other words, more display, incoming data more are needed to correctly display the video. Think of bitrate in terms of a can of paint. If you have 1 quart of paint, you might be able to do a very nice job on an area of 32 X 24 feet. But if you try to stretch the same amount of paint on a surface area of 64 X 48 feet, the coverage is not as good and you get mediocre results.
  Similarly, a video display to 640 X 480 pixels will require 4 times the baud rate as a video displayed at 320 X 240 pixels to produce the same quality. Thus, for example, a video with a speed of 100 kbps, 160 X 120 displayed will produce the same quality results as a video with a bitrate of 1600 kb/s is displayed in 640 X 480.
  So, to sum it all, 750 Kbps, even up to 1000 kbps video rates can usually get delivered high-speed Internet on most connections. Higher rates may work for connections very fast but will cause problems for viewers with slower connections. Video display size has a direct impact on the final quality. In the range of 750 to 1000 Kbps, display size should be maintained around 450 or 500 width max (and whatever the height proportions claims). Yes it can be displayed larger, but the quality will suffer.
  Sounds like the audio settings are fine, especially for delivery on the Internet.
  Regarding the framerate, maintain the framerate video original raw for best results. Therefore, if the clip was shot at 24 frames per second, let him.
  In regards to video converters, you have the Flash 8 Video Converter? It works very well for the video to be delivered over the Internet. Don't forget, you're taking a Cadillac of video (h.264 HD) version and cram into a Chevy body so he can work on the Internet.

  Best wishes

  Adninjastrator