Business Rule _ on calc dynamic members

Similar Questions

• cross dimensional operators on calc dynamic members

  The dimensions of my product and market are stored dimensions used in a calc script in AccountX calculation as follows:
  
  "AccountX" = "AccountB"->"product"-> "market"->"organization";
  
  I would like to change the dimensions of products and market to dynamic calc, but wonder if it would affect involuntary the calculation above, I would like to remain the same.
  
  In other words, can I use Crusaders dimensional operators on calc dynamic members without any problems?

  In principle you can cross-Sun dynamic members Calc, but this can have an impact on the performance of recovery especially if product / market are (and I assume they are) sparse dimensions.

  You must carefully test performance / calc order impact etc. in any case if you do what you suggest, which is much larger than any impact on this script formula especially calco - but I guess you know who.

• Business rules endangered in Calc Manager

  I have a planning application classic on 11.1.2.1 crossing calc Manager business rules, but just the other day I logged in i could no longer see in calc business rules manager when I go to the database. The rules still run and are visible in other places as the head of corporate security rule but not in calc Manager. I tried to restart the Manager of calc, reconfiguration weblogic, creating new rules (that actually works but the old is still invisible). I've migrated on the environment from another environment, without success. Any idea what could be the problem?
  
  Thank you!
  Mark

  Hi, have you migrated rules if Appication group-> Foundation-> Manager calculation way of LCM? Or just the rules with your application. It looks like the second, but this is not enough, that you must use the first one too.
  He didn't explain what happened with you the rules but can help you to restore

• How to select multiple members in a business rule variable?

  Hi all

  I have a business rule with the following statement of the correction:

  DIFFICULTY ({those}, {scenario}, @LIST (@RELATIVE ({count}, 0)), of 'Work')

  Account is a variable:

  Type: Member

  Dimension: account

  The rule works when a user selects a single account: Total revenue.  When I change the variable count to 'Members' and select several accounts: Total revenue, Total loads, the rule does not run.  Here is the log:

  Not valid [Calc Script syntax

  DIFFICULTY ("FY14", "Forecast", @LIST (@RELATIVE ("recipes", "Total expenses", 0)), 'Work')

  Is there a way to make this rule work for multiple selections of Member?

  Thank you

  Mehmet

  PS We are on 11.1.2.2.300.20

  Hi Mehmet,

  If you decide to give this another go, in my view, there is just a syntax error.  I got the code below to validate, however I try to run anything.

  DIFFICULTY ("FY14", "Forecasts", @EXPAND ("@DESC", @LIST ("recipes", "Total expenses"), 0, LAYERONLY), 'Work')

  Hope this helps,

  -Jake

• Dynamic members of calc & store are not copied on another escenary

  Hello:
  I have a dimension (Business Unit), where several members of level 1 are "dynamic calc & store.
  If I copy a 'draft budget' staging data for another staged 'budget', sometimes some values in members of this "dynamic calc & store" are not copied (they show #missing in 'budget'). All the data of level 0 is just. Also, level 1 in Member data is stored. Most strange is that some calc dynamic level 1 & store members are also copied.
  
  -Is anyone knows why is this happenning?
  -Is it possible to avoid this?
  -What happens if I change the ths dyn calc & store stored members? It will change the data?
  
  Any suggestions would be very helpful for me.
  I'm working with essbase 9.3.1
  Thanks in advance and best regards,
  Joaquin Castellano

  Hi Joaquin,.

  If you do all the saved then next generation of cube, will arrive at the aggregation and users will see the correct values.

  Atul K,.

• Members on the lines, can they be passed to running guest in a business rule?

  Can I ask you how can members on the lines past their value at the prompt of the execution in a business rule? I checked a post above saying that this can be done but it was 2010 any chance that there is a way now to do?

  Thank you in advance,

  Members on the lines, can they be passed to running guest in a business rule?

  You can do this if you use a Menu to launch rules in planning, any POV associated with the clicked cell is passed in the SPTR

  in the screen shot here you can see, I accessed the menu of the cell in red, I had selected a cell in the grid, period and year also would have been settled.

  

• 11.1.2.3.700 Calc manager - cannot open business rules in IE11 but can in Firefox

  Updated 11.1.2.3.500 to 700 for the IE11 support.

  I installed the following hotfixes:

  1 20675028 - SSP

  2 20612400 - workspace

  3 20643564 - hyperion Planning

  4 20929659 - architect EPM (foundation server)

  5 21292109 - Manager of calculation

  6 20768325 - statement and analytical framework

  7. 21240419 - ADF MLR

  I deleted the directory tmp and cache on servers managed and the Planning0 and calcmgr0

  (Oracle\Middleware\user_projects\domains\EPMSystem\servers\CalcMgr0)

  History/cache deleted my Internet Explore.

  When I go to the calculation Manager and try to open any business rule of calculation Manager I receive the following informational message: "Please try to reload the component script again." When you click on 'OK' I do not see any text in the business rule. (See attachment)

  
  I can run the business rules of the application of planning successfully and I can see them under "Shared Services" and import/export business rules.

  Calculation of the Manager process runs on the server, the logs show no errors in the Oracle\Middleware\user_projects\epmsystem1\diagnostics directory

  Tried to search for the message but could not find anything about this message.

  Any suggestions?

  OK, I think I understand what is happening, I noticed a difference between the user interface in your screenshots and it seems that you disabled for calc Manager ADF.

  You will be able to confirm is that you run a report of registry and it will have a BINDOWS_ENABLED = true for the CALC_MANAGER_PRODUCT property

  If I pass the ADF to bindows so I see the same problem, is there a reason you do not run ADF mode?

  See you soon

  John

• Business rules that write to members as read-only?

  Hi all

  Hyperion Planning 11.1.1.3 user with a read access to the members were able to write the data using business rules.

  Now, let me know if this has been fixed in the newer version 11.1.2.3 or still they exist.

  Concerning

  Anubhav Boitel

  Hello

  Not is still not corrected in 11.1.2.3 as well. And I don't think it will be close in early releases as Essbase must resolve individual access permissions which runs the rule and which would add something to the current schedule of enforcement of the rule.

  Incase there are such better rule make you a folder separated with restricted user access on them. As this is a very difficult task to check for the planning system to see what are the members in the BR has the user to access. I think that's the reason to launch access to the BRS because they are very sensitive which can make your app obsolete in terms of data.

  Thank you

  Amith

• How to migrate EAS Business Rules for Calc Manager in 11.1.2.1 (without using EPMA)

  Hi all

  for the moment, we are on 11.1.2.1 and one more late upgrade scheduled to 11.1.2.3, use Calc Manager rather than the rules Business (EAS). Therefore, I would like to upgrade to business at Calc Manager rules, but without using EPMA (we would still use the classic Planning Administration). I read several documents and sites, but I was unable to find a way to do... Does anyone have a how or documentation about my problem?

  Thank you very much

  André

  P.S.: Maybe to make it a bit clearer: I won't spend 11.1.2.1 to 11.1.2.2. I would only use Calc Manager instead of business EAS rules 11.1.2.1 and I couldn't find anything that shows how or if it is possible to migrate from the business rules to Calc Manager (without using EPMA).

  You can change the method of calculation of the Manager of Calc application. I replied to your message in the Manager area of Calc.

  Concerning

  Celvin

• Export of Calc nursery business rules

  Hi all
  
  When I try to export Calc nursery business rules, nothing happens, but I can import into calc feeder.
  I use EMP 11.1.2.1
  
  Appreciate your help

  Are you sure that you follow steps to export below:
  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E17236_01/EPM.1112/cmgr_admin/cmgr_export.html

  See you soon...!
  Rahul S.

• Writing rounded business rule using Calc Manager

  I'm new to Hyperion and I need to write a business rule by using the crib of calc. I need to write the rule that is recommended to round the vale accounts for almost value. Please suggest me how to use the function of business rule?
  Thank you

  You should be able to use the same functions in calc Manager.

  See you soon

  John
  http://John-Goodwin.blogspot.com/

• Bishop of Calc - unlock the business rule

  Hello
  
  New on Calc Mgr. I need to change a business rule, but when I open it, it will not change. When I try and delete a message comes up saying that another user is editing currenty. The other user has not worked here for quite awhile, so impossible. Is he blocked? How it free to the top?
  
  Thank you

  Hello
  Normally the openning the rule with the name of the user who locked it and its closure would open the rule. However, you can recycle the service GestionnaireCalc and it should do the same trick.

  See you soon,.
  Alp

• XREF (calc Manager) 11.1.2.2 planning business rules

  I try to use the XREF to import text between planning bd Member models app using business rules, but it does not work. is it possible to use the XREF in this case?

  Thank you

  Elena

  Hello Elena,

  What do you mean with a member of "text"? If it is a comment, then you can not use XREF, since it is stored in the relational database. When a SmartList, then value is stored in the Essbase database and that can be transferred with XREF to a different database.

  If you want to display the same text in the other application, then you must create the SmartList even here. Otherwise, the values do not match.

  The fundamental question is, is the text somehow stored in Essbase or not. You can see with the classic reporting Excel AddIn or ad hoc. It is not 'translate' the value in a text.

  Kind regards

  Philip Hulsebosch.

  www.trexco.nl

• "Cascading" business rules composite form of Tabs

  Long post. I'm here for the ACEs in the stem. In 11.1.2.2.300, we have a composite form with multiple shapes in the form of tabs. Two of these forms have business rules that run on individual forms, not on the Composite shape. Three of these forms have no business rules that run when recording. The following behavior is:

  1. when we open the composite shape to a tab of a form without top business rules and click on save, the data is committed.

  2. when we opened the composite shape to a tab of a form that has a business rule that works on record and click on save, the data are engaged and the business rule is executed.

  3. the problem is there: when we open the composite shape to a tab of a form that has a company that rule runs on save and then we open a DIFFERENT tab with a DIFFERENT shape which has NO business rule to this subject, and click on save the data on the open tab/form is committed and the business rule goes against the members on the OPEN form. Not the form that made the business rule to this topic.

  4. If, after step three, you open a different form that also has a top business rule and press on save, it runs both the business rule in the open form, AND the business rule of form before.

  Is this a bug? For?

  For those of you more visually inclined:

  Form/tab A - form by default upon opening, without BR

  Form/tab B - BR

  Form/tab C - no BR

  Form/tab D - BR

  Form/tab E - BR

  1. open Data Composite of form - see form A. press on save - committed to the database.

  2. click on the tab B. press on save. Data committed to the database. B rule business runs.

  3. click on the tab C. press save. Data committed to the database. Company B of the rule is running on members on form C.

  4. click on tab D. press save. Data committed to the database. Company B of the rule is running on members of business of d. form rule, D runs.

  5. click on the tab E. press save. Data committed to the database. Company B of the rule is running on members of the form E. company rule D works on members of the form E.

  NOW the weird part!

  1. open the composite shape - see formula.

  2. click on tab D.

  3. click on the tab B. press on save. Data committed to the database. Business rule B runs first on the members on the form B. business rule D then runs on Member on form B.

  Our first theory was that because BR B came first in alphabetical order in the calc Manager, B pulled before. We have this disproved by renaming and changing the order of B and D in calc Manager. BR B always run before D. BR our second theory was that the business rules are executed based on the order in which they appear in the tabs. But we have refuted this as well. We concluded that the order of business rules is in order that their "links" exist in the rules on the Composite shape. Help!

  Tried this on our system and we have same question... It looks like another bug in EMP 11.1.2.3... SR trigger with the support of the oracle, they could fix it in future versions...

• Validation error in calculation Manager business rule (@_AT)?

  I've migrated a 11.1.1.3 business rule and both macros (models) in the calculation Manager 11.1.2.2. When I validate the script I get the following error. Everyone has seen this before or have any advice? Script syntax checks ok.

  "An error occurred in: rule: FCO_3YrBud_DGAlloc error: formula [statement of DIFFICULTY] (line 24) parse error: expected [()] found [@_AT]" after the function name rule FCO_3YrBud_DGAlloc ".

  Line 24 is the first declaration of FIX in the script below show:

  UPDATECALC OFF SET; AGGMISSG OFF SET;

  Model of % (name: = "FCOm_TargetSection", ask: = 'FCO', plantype: = 'FCO', PDT: = ("parm1": = ([["three year Budget"]]), "parm2": = ([["DGAllocation"]]), "parm3":=([[{FCOrtpYears}]]),"parm4":=([[Mar]])))))

  Model of % (name: = "FCOm_TargetAgg", ask: = 'FCO', plantype: = 'FCO', PDT: = ("parm1": = ([["three year Budget"]]), "parm2": = ([["DGAllocation"]]), "parm3":=([[{FCOrtpYears}]]),"parm4":=([[Mar]])))))

  First model:

  UPDATECALC OFF SET; AGGMISSG OFF SET;

  /****************************************************************************************************************

  FCOm_TargetSection

  parm1 = scenario

  PARM2 = version

  parm3 = years

  parm4 = periods

  The purpose of this macro is to translate GBP target and copy in the Curr entry and aggreggated. Step 1: Copy the total Section entry to I / P Total Section and no step 1 project: copy converted into money - no need to translate entries all entries are in GBP step 2: copy entry GBP to Curr NA values

  *****************************************************************************************************************/

  DIFFICULTY (([["trois ans Budget"]]), ([["DGAllocation"]]), ([["FY15"]]), ([[Sun]]), @IDESCENDANTS ("BH - T"), "Curr NA", "basic", 'Entry in the currency', ' one - 6111 "," A - 6112 ',' A - 6113 ', ' a - 65 ',' A - 66 ',' A - 620905 ')

  DATACOPY 'Total Section' to 'Input_Total Section;

  DATACOPY 'Total Section' to 'no project ';

  ENDFIX

  DIFFICULTY (([["trois ans Budget"]]), ([["DGAllocation"]]), ([["FY15"]]), ([[Sun]]), @IDESCENDANTS ("BH - T"), 'Curr NA', 'Total Section', Section 'Input_Total', 'No project', ' base', ' a - 6111 "," A - 6112 ',' A - 6113 ',' A - 65 ',' A - 66 ',' A - 620905 ')

  DATACOPY 'entered currency' to 'convert currency (GBP);

  ENDFIX

  DIFFICULTY (([["trois ans Budget"]]), ([["DGAllocation"]]), ([["FY15"]]), ([[Sun]]), @IDESCENDANTS ("BH - T"), "Total area", 'Input_Total', 'No project' Section, "basic", 'Entered in the currency ", converted into currency (GBP)', ' a - 6111", "A - 6112 ',' A - 6113 ',' a - 65 ',' A - 66 ',' A - 620905 ')

  DATACOPY "Curr NA ' to 'entry GBP;

  ENDFIX

  Second model:

  /****************************************************************************************************************

  FCOm_TargetAgg

  parm1 = scenario

  PARM2 = version

  parm3 = years

  parm4 = periods

  The purpose of this macro is to target data aggreggate Step2: aggregate data

  *****************************************************************************************************************/

  DIFFICULTY (([["trois ans Budget"]]), ([["DGAllocation"]]), ([["FY15"]]), ([[Sun]]), "basic", "Entered in the currency ',' converted to currency (GBP)")

  CALC DIM ("account", "BudgetHolder", "Admission tickets", "SectionProjects");

  ENDFIX

  In fact

  I just re thinking about your message. My comments above is not correct for your situation. The syntax above is correct if you are talking about the code 'in' the model itself (so if you open the template and look at the code). But if the code you have posted in your messages made from the window of script of the rule (in script view) then your problem is something different potentially.

  So the first thing is to make sure that in the model itself (open model), the PDT is defined in the global range or range of Member as [Parm1], [Parm2] etc. (or difficulty, depends on the way the model is shown) as I said in my first reply above, the model only defines the DTP, not members and must be placed between square brackets , as [Parm1}. Who will make that the DTP as defined in your model correctly. Then we need to look at how you define these PDT in the rule itself. Normally, it is much easier if your rule is in the chart view, as you just click on the model and you can enter the values. As you have your rule in Script mode, you must be very careful about how you set the values of the PAO. Every DTP 'type' has a different syntax in script mode.

  Looking at your script again I see another problem potentially. When you set the values in the DTP, the value must locking with double brackets, so [['three year Budget"]]. In your script, you must also in brackets. That is not always correct. There are moments between brackets and double square brackets is correct, but it is only when your DTP is of type 'Members', and by default, according to me, old macros of business rule translates into templates with the "Script" DTP types

  So, if you also change your business section where the models are defined as below; (as you can see, without parentheses around the DTP values).

  UPDATECALC OFF SET; AGGMISSG OFF SET;

  Model % (name: = "FCOm_TargetSection", application: = 'FCO', plantype: = 'FCO', dtps:=("parm1":=[["Three_Year_Budget"]],"parm2":=[["DGAllocation"]],"parm3":=[[{FCOrtpYears}]],"parm4":=[[Mar]]))))

  Model % (name: = "FCOm_TargetAgg", application: = 'FCO', plantype: = 'FCO', dtps:=("parm1":=[["Three_Year_Budget"]],"parm2":=[["DGAllocation"]],"parm3":=[[{FCOrtpYears}]],"parm4":=[[Mar]]))))

  The end of the game should be that when you open your rule and the view script and script tab then select low bottom your models should look as below, as you can see, everything that needs to be included in the script are the values substituted for the definition of the model, the key point is that there are no brackets or parentheses. The script should show script "pure". (I have highlighted and underlined how these 4 PDT should result in script mode)

  First model:

  UPDATECALC OFF SET; AGGMISSG OFF SET;

  /****************************************************************************************************************

  FCOm_TargetSection

  parm1 = scenario

  PARM2 = version

  parm3 = years

  parm4 = periods

  The purpose of this macro is to translate the target entry to GBP and copy of Curr NA and associate. Step 1: Copy the total Section entry to I / P Total Section and no step 1 project: copy converted into money - no need to translate entries all entries are in GBP step 2: copy entry GBP to Curr NA values

  *****************************************************************************************************************/

  DIFFICULTY ('Three-year Budget', 'DGAlocation', FY15, Mar, @IDESCENDANTS ("BH - T"), "Curr NA", "basic", 'Seized currency', '-6111 ", '-6112", "has - 6113", "A - 65", "A - 66", "-620905")

  DATACOPY 'Total Section' to 'Input_Total Section;

  DATACOPY 'Total Section' to 'no project ';

  ENDFIX

  DIFFICULTY ('Three-year Budget', 'DGAlocation', FY15, Mar, @IDESCENDANTS ("BH - T"), "Curr NA', 'Total Section', Section 'Input_Total', 'No project', 'basic', '-6111", '-6112 "," has - 6113 "," A - 65 "," A - 66 ","-620905 ")

  DATACOPY 'entered currency' to 'convert currency (GBP);

  ENDFIX

  DIFFICULTY (FY15, Mar, 'DGAlocation' and 'Three-year Budget', @IDESCENDANTS("BH-T"), 'Total Section', Section 'Input_Total', 'No project', 'basic', 'Entered in the currency "," converted into currency (GBP)', '-6111 ", '-6112", "-6113", "A - 65", "A - 66", "-620905")

  DATACOPY "Curr NA ' to 'entry GBP;

  ENDFIX

  Thank you

  Anthony