C720 image quality

Similar Questions

• The image quality of MacBook Air vs Pro

  Hello

  I just bought a MacBook Air 13 "and I got a MacBook Pro 13" (non-retine) till now.
  If I compare the image quality between Air and Pro there is a difference of contrast and sharpness of the colors. The monitors setting is the same on both Macs, the Air is even supposed to have high resolution (1440 x 900 instead of 1280 x 800, the MacBook Pro). Graphics card is Intel HD Graphics 6000 1536 MB vs 4000 in my MacBook Pro.

  Anyone know if there is a difference in both computers display technology, or if this could be a problem in my Macbook Air?

  THX in advance and best regards

  Products and specifications:

  MacBook Air (13 ", Anfang 2015)

  Intel Core i7 2.2 GHz

  8 GB 1600 MHz DDR3

  Intel HD Graphics 6000 1536 MB

  LCD display is different between Pro and Air. Don't know which group is better.

• S70 satellite image quality - A - 11 H web camera is not good

  Hello

  Running windows 8.1 which came with the laptop.
  New out of the box.

  According to the title.

  I find the quality of the image of the camera very grainy color image, poor etc.

  When I start the webcam using the search bar on the right, he begins using the Microsoft application, when you access all the parameters that is available under settings/options is Photo image format, the grid lines, the location information.

  I've been in touch with Toshiba support who advised to do a refresh of laptop, I did.
  It made no difference.

  After which they asked me to find the Toshiba web camera application on your laptop, it should have been in the Program Files folder in the folder of Toshiba.
  This application does not exist on my laptop.

  Technology verified the same laptop model, that he was available, he said when he selected the webcam, he opened using Web of Toshiba, Microsoft no camera app.

  I looked at the other portable Toshiba with web cameras and found the picture quality to be better. Unable to get to settings and these computers portable on-screen and in demo mode, so locked up to a certain extent.

  I can't believe a web camera in this day and age for this value of laptop to have this bad image quality. My digital camera of 10 years ago has a better picture quality.

  I checked through the laptop, and I don't have this app installed.

  I have checked for software and drivers updated to my laptop and cannot find this application applies to my laptop. Etc drivers seem to be up to date.

  I would like to know, other users of this series S have any camera image quality problem.
  What application is used when the camera is selected, Toshiba or Microsoft.

  Is Toshiba web camera application for Windows 8.1, that I don't see not listed for 8.1
  This sounds like a hardware failure or a problem with the application/software.

  Any guidance or help on this would be appreciated, because I came to a point of the return of this laptop for a refund.

  Thanks in advance.

  D.

  Yes, I tried using FORCE!

  > Technology checked the same laptop model, that he was available, he said when he selected the webcam, he opened using Web of Toshiba, Microsoft no camera app.

  Toshiba webcam app is available for the system Win 7 but win it 8 and 8.1 of Windows system use the webcam from Microsoft to the own address application.

  > I looked at the other portable Toshiba with web cameras and found the picture quality to be better.
  Different Toshiba laptops are equipped with different webcams.
  Satellite S70 - A - 11 H was fitted with a * 0.92 mega pixel webcam *.

  For example a Satellite A660 was equipped with a mega pixel webcam_ _1.3M

  There is therefore a difference of resolution of the webcam

• Satellite L755D - Webcam: very bad image quality?

  Hello @all,

  I have a SAT. 755 (OS: win7 64 bit). The webcam returns a very bad image quality and I noticed that the driver is from the year 2006 (Microsoft, Version 6.1.760.17514).

  I installied the last 'pilot' vom site of Toshiba (version 2.0.0.19), which actually just updated the CAM software.

  It is a fact, that this webcam is of very poor quality, or could someone please help me improve the photos, which are not only in poor Skype, but also when I just test the cam.

  Greetings from the Austria
  erkg1959

  Hello

  Please check the film in front of the lens is detached.
  I think that many models is delivered with a protective film in front of the goal and it is not too easy to do.

  See you soon!

  Tom

• Toshiba Camileo Pro HD - bad image quality camcorder

  I recently bought a toshiba camileo pro hd camcorder due to its size and 720 hd quality.

  I connected through my wlt toshiba tv via the component cable, but the picture quality is bad. It seems very grainy. I thought it was the connection, but these have been checked and were perfect.

  IM pretty impressed if this is how it will run even if it was valuable.

  I'm doing something wrong?

  Cheers for all the advice

  Hello

  If you image quality is bad check details in the menu setting by choosing the right standard of TV (try PAL and NTSC as an alternative).

  And if the LCD screen image is unclear when shooting, try to turn the ring to 'Focus' on the circumference of the lens on the proper position: (general/Figure/Macro)

  Good bye

• IdeaPad Yoga 13 - HDMI of bad image quality on the TV 1080 p screen?

  Hi people, I have recently connected my Yoga via HDMI to my TV Samsung 40 ". Unfortunately, the image quality does not as good as my old T61 via VGA hooked up to my TV. Image via HDMI on my TV has some sort of "shadows" around the edges at all. I use a HDMI Basics Amazon cable that is capable of 3D and Ethernet over HDMI - I think this cable should be ok.

  Did it someone else faced with problems with the picture quality of the Yoga on a TV via HDMI before?

  Just for completeness: it was my TV sharpness settings. I had to turn off completely disable the artifacts.

• Bad PCI-1405 image quality

  I just got a fg PCI-1405 to replicate an old Imaging System. I use a Sony XC - ST50 (PAL) monochrome camera.

  The image quality is poor. He has a blurry pixelated, look to it. I remember that the last time I bought the fg of low-end of NOR, I had a similar problem and had to switch to the Commission more expensive which worked very well. I find it had to believe that NEITHER would sell a POS, so what am I doing wrong? Is there some sort of configuration that I'm missing?

  Note: I have the camera set up like a PAL camera standard.

  Thank you!

  It is a device of XC-ST50CE. However, I was playing around with some parameters. This combination gave me good results:

  Luma - full bandwidth

  Luma comb - disabled

  Trap of Chroma - off

  Luma peaked - disabled

  Bandwidth of Chroma - high (probably any)

  Comb of Chroma - off (probably any)

  Treatment of Chroma - always off (probably any)

• The image quality with the Canon 5Dmark 2 vs... The 5Dmark3?

  I use Leica lenses on a canon with an adapter body.  Is the image quality with the Canon 5Dmark 2 vs.the 5Dmark3 similar?  A reason to get one against the other?  I like the idea that I can change the viewfinder on the Mk 2 screens. Any overwhelming improvement in the 5Dmark 3 that would justify the review?  Thanks to those who have used the two boxes.

  The main advantage of a Mk3 on the Mk2 is the AF.  Most points and it can focus with f/8.   If your Leica lens is manual focus, then you would not care to this topic.  3 5 has a bit of an advantage in the ISO but not a huge factor.  Another one, I'd say that IQ is the same.

• I took a video on my Android phone that is currently playing in Windows Media Player 90 to the horizontal. on VLC player, but the image quality is very poor on this player.

  original title: video orientation

  I took a video on my Android phone that is currently playing in Windows Media Player 90 to the horizontal. I tried to watch the videos on VLC Player, but the image quality is very poor on this player. I have Windows XP Home Edition so the moviemaker product will not work. Are there other options available to get my videos to play properly?

  You can rotate the video to display in VLC media player:

  Open an it... then video and pause go to...
  Tools / effects and filters / video effects tab / geometry tab.
  Select the check box turn / slide the circle / close / play.

  If you want the video permanently turned... Movie Maker
  worth a try, but you will need to convert the video to the
  . Before importing WMV format.

  There are many converters available on the net... some
  free... some detail.

  The following freeware converter is just one example:

  (FWIW... it's always a good idea to create a system)
  Restore point before installing software or updates)

  Format Factory (freeware)
  http://www.videohelp.com/tools/Format_Factory
  (the 'direct link' is faster download)
  (the file you want to download is: > FFSetup280.zip<>
  (FWIW... installation..., you can uncheck
  ('all' boxes on the final screens)
  (Windows XP / Vista / 7)

  First, you will need to decompress the file or just open the
  Drag FFSetup280.exe out of the folder
  and drop it on your desktop. To install left click.

  Next, after the download and installation of Format
  Factory... you can open the program and
  left click on the toolbar, the "Option" button and
  "Select an output folder to" / apply / OK.
  (this is where you find your files after they)
  are converted)

  Drag and drop your video clips on the main screen...

  Select "all to WMV" / OK...

  Click on... Beginning... in the toolbar...

  That should do it...

  Good luck...

• my image quality when using photoshop on my ipad Lossing pro, do you know why? Thank you

  Usually, I imported the image of my Nikon D750 directly into my pro Ipad so I can edit them with Photoshop but at the end, when you try to print my photo the image quality is really bad so I can't print it?

  Any help would be much appreciated.

  Thank you

  Hello gusphotographe and Andrei!

  Unfortunately, the RAW files are not fully supported in Fix or Mix. That's why you can be faced with problems with degradation or trouble to open the images. I know it's frustrating, I apologize for the inconvenience!

  Please let me know if I can help with anything else.

  See you soon!

  -Kathleen

• Is it possible to capture screenshots in Captivate in 300 dpi image quality?

  Is it possible to capture screenshots in Captivate and record in 300 dpi image quality?

  I use Photoshop to edit. Capture can't a total of resolution per inch resolution in Captivate, based on browser resolution. Why do you need a 300 pixels per inch? For a retina display?

• The upgrade and image quality [compare the elements to Photoshop]

  Hello:

  I've been using 6 items (yes I know, pre-historic) to edit and organize my photos. My collection of items has about 2600 images. Time to upgrade and I am convinced that Lightroom is the way forward for the organization. My question is for the Assembly. Almost all of my editing has been managed by the elements basic stuff. I wonder if I need the full Photoshop provided with Creative Cloud.

  My first question is program Photoshop will produce a better quality in a picture if I did the same editing with my old Elements 6. There was an improvement in the image processing program?

  Notice please.

  Jim Rendos

  Hi Jim

  Camera RAW is certainly improved, the come of great change with PV2012 (process Version 2012 aka ACR 7) introduced with Photoshop CS6.  Other changes have been made to Camera RAW, and Lightroom even more, but their impact on the image quality is zero (AFAICR).  Of course, you'd have the same version of treatment with the recent versions of Lightroom if you take this route.

  The difference between PV2012 and PV2010 are noticeable in the shadow and highlight recovery.  Especially to hide him.  You remember produces bad artifacts setting shadows / highlights.  PV2012 allows you to push the bejazus from a RAW file while keeping things at least somewhere near sensitive.  I've always hated the shadows / highlights and could never understand the fuss people do about it.

  Who help me?

• Who has the highest image quality?

  I'm working on a huge project, analysis of the thousands of books, documents and files that I have collected over the years in the form of PDF files. I use a scanner high speed when possible, using a dish only for items that cannot be digitized with a scanner high speed (large size files and folders in several pages for example). My plan is to digitize everything as quickly as possible, so I can have a digital copy safely stored in my computer and some external hard drives. This is probably what I need to do for only text files, which I can throw then (the copy of the paper, that is).

  However, I want to make a new image analysis (and perhaps some elements of text) at a higher resolution on my scanner so I can have copies of higher quality. Then I'll try to figure out the best resolution and what file type to save as. I use a scanner Epson Perfection V33. Am I right in thinking that quality would be offered by a .tiff file, followed by a .jpg with a .pdf file file lower quality?

  The quality of most of my material is not extraordinary, and I probably won't be much as TIFF, scanner due to the huge file size. So I think that the best option for images (and the text that I might want to scan as an image) is jpg. Is there any particular optimal resolutions that you would recommend?

  Thank you.

  "Image quality" in a document PDF is created by the image quality of the image that is presented in the PDF document.

  A PDF file can and often there are a lot of images with each having a different image resolution.

  If you have content text on paper and that you want to scan it, go to TIFF and then create a PDF of TIFF.

  This optimises the accuracy of OCR recognition.

  JPEG production involves typically "ugly" compression (compression by destructive removal of content) - not too goof to images of text that you want to pass by OCR.

  Analysis of the text to TIFF - 300 dpi will suffice in most situations. Avoid JPEG compression.

  Be well...

• A question about the image quality?

  I create my menus by using an image that is offered by selected relative when positioning.

  That's by the by... However my menu option is set on the screen as 30 pixels wide.

  If I create the actual image as 30 pixels wide so that the text is very unbalanced and is horrible.

  So if my menu shows 400px by 30px w h and image real must be 800px w h how do I create a good quality image without having such quality terrible 30px?

  I create higher resolution and then somehow reduce the width of the bottom?

  Thank you

  Terry

  Do you use a high-resolution Retina Display?

  Image quality is determined by the total number of pixels in your image - h X w, 325 x 200 500 x 400 vs and the 72 vs 96 ppi vs 300.  So if your screen has a pixel density of high, normal web images may appear grainy on your device but is generally not a problem for the screens with a normal pixel density.

  Consider using the Bootstrap Glyphicons or Fonts-Awesome icons and SVG.

  Open your PSD into illustrator and SaveAs SVG (scalable vector) that is much sharper than bitmaps.

  See the following article:

  A guide to creating a better web of retina - Ivo Mynttinen / User Interface DDesigner

  Nancy O.

• How to get the best image quality when you insert PDF into Word?

  I am able to insert a PDF file as an object in Word, but the image quality is a bit fuzzy.  Is this what I can adjust in order to improve the clarity of the image in Word?

  You can try to extract the images with the help of extract all Images or select only the parameters of the screen recording you get when you save in a DOC, but I think that the general result is that the image recorded with the same resolution as shown in the PDF document. It may be that you simply adjust your screen in WORD. You can look at the picture in WORD and see if it is used at 100% or some other resolution. Bitmaps are not very forgiving if the resolution is changed to the document and not as something other than the small number of fractions of resolution appears change.