Change the query to a Count (*)

Similar Questions

• Change the query to a display object

  I have a view currently, object based on an entity. It is the default view object, which means that the query the view object is frank, he grabs all the attributes of the table. And there is no WHERE clause.
  
  Actually, I only want to show a finite set of rows in my table. Whenever a record is modified/edited in this entity and committed, a new row in the database is created with the same information (I use CreateWithParams) with the exception of a few columns.
  
  I actually didn't really update it on this table, just creating new lines. But to the user, I want it 'looks' like they change something in the table.
  
  Example:
  
  12, 11:32, Thompson, 60 (changes to the user this information in a table of the adf and a new line is created in the comic book)
  
  12, 11:55, Thompson, 75
  
  
  
  
  
  I have a timestamp field (see above) in the database that is used as part of my primary key, while I know that is later.
  
  When executing the query of the VO, I want the user to only see as the last row of the db.
  
  12, 11:55, Thompson, 75
  
  Then...
  
  I went to my VO, and I changed the query WHERE to add this:
  
  where t1. TimeStamp = (Select MAX (t2. (TimeStamp) OF THE rcl.x t2 where t1.uid = t2.uid);
  
  
  Now, this isn't a question of mysql/sql. There is actually a better query I was running, but the editor of the VO does not allow me to change the query itself...
  
  When I save the new WHERE to my VO, rerun my page, I get the expected result (showing me only the latest recordings).
  
  However, when I try and do a sort on the table in which are displayed my data, I get now ORDER BY errors.
  
  I don't want my VO SQL read-only basis. I want to be able to update my table, so I have my VO running out of the entity.
  
  
  
  Why don't the VO allows me to change the query itself? (As do a subquery instead of having my where clause to do the job)
  
  Why are sorted by errors are thrown when I sort on my adf table after changing the where clause in my opinion?
  
  I hope I was not too complicated in explanation of my problem...
  
  Thanks in advance,
  
  Joel

  Hello

  You can switch the VO query editor based on an EO to expert mode. This allows you to change the entire query. Unless you change the use of the attribute, the update through this VO work. Open the VO query and choose the Expert mode option of the query to see what I mean

  Frank

• Extend the VO - need to change the query of VO - screen is off

  {Re-post the message in this forum (thanks to John Stegeman to lead me here...)   {Posted: August 28, 2009 04:27}
  
  Dear all,
  
  Thanks to this great body of knowledge, I ask my questions.
  
  I need to extend a VO to display the name of the country.
  The column is not in the VO. So, I need to get another table: FndTerritories
  
  I want to change the query, but the request frame is turned off (in the wizard the View - step 5 of 6 - Generated statement object substitution)
  
  Could you be it someone please let me know: how to change the application of the VO in this case?
  
  OR is there another solution for such cases, to maintain development standards
  
  Thank you very much
  
  Kind regards

  Hello

  I think that's when you just have to add an attribute, you should not click the expert mode checkbox... make use of
  Mix and add the button.

  But when you need to modify the query, and then we want to use to modify the query window...

  Thank you
  Gerard

• changing the query update

  Hello
  
  In the following update query
  

  update C2C_BK_RATING_23112011 f
  set f.bk_rating_id = 'HDB'
  where f.bk_rating_id like 'HDFC';

  I want to update all the records in the column of bk_rating_id when the value of bk_rating_id is to HDB HDFC, the bk_rating_id column is to have values as shown below:
  

  HDFC 10
  HDFC 2
  HDFC 3
  HDFC 4
  HDFC 5
  HDFC 6
  HDFC 7
  HDFC 8
  HDFC 9
  HDFC 1

  How can I change the update query to make the output voltage:
  

  HDB 10
  HDB 2
  HDB 3
  HDB 4
  HDB 5
  HDB 6
  HDB 7
  HDB 8
  HDB 9
  HDB 1

  Hello
  Like this:

  update C2C_BK_RATING_23112011 f
    set f.bk_rating_id = REPLACE(bk_rating_id,'HDFC','HDB')
  where f.bk_rating_id like 'HDFC%';
  

• Bug: APEX_COLLECTION. CREATE_COLLECTION_FROM_QUERY_B change the query string

  Hi APEX Dev Team.
  
  I found a bug (or I don't know how to get around unexpected behavior) in APEX_COLLECTION. CREATE_COLLECTION_FROM_QUERY_B. I think that it also applies to the CREATE_COLLECTION_FROM_QUERY.
  
  What's happening: some strings are replaced in the query, I pass into the function. for example '22% ' is replaced by a white. It is not good if I have a query like this:

  SELECT MYCOLA, MYCOLB, MYCOLC FROM MYTABLEA WHERE MYPHONE LIKE '%22306%';

  This returns no rows in the collection. If I run this query in SQL Developer she returns 5 rows.
  
  When I change the declaration subsequently, it returns 5 rows in the collection.

  SELECT MYCOLA, MYCOLB, MYCOLC FROM MYTABLEA WHERE MYPHONE LIKE '%2306%';

  Trace shows me, the first SELECT statement is replaced by

  SELECT MYCOLA, MYCOLB, MYCOLC FROM MYTABLEA WHERE MYPHONE LIKE ' 306%';

  Which is obviously false :-)
  
  The changes seem to be limited to 22%, I found no other characters encoding URLS that are replaced in the query.
  
  Please fix, as I can't find any workaround.
  
  Thank you
  Peter
  
  -----
  Blog: http://www.oracle-and-apex.com
  ApexLib: http://apexlib.oracleapex.info
  BuilderPlugin: http://builderplugin.oracleapex.info
  Work: http://www.click-click.at

  Hi Peter,.

  Thanks for reporting this. This seems to be a legacy logic which is no longer necessary (the logic to replace the string '22% '). I corrected it to Application Express 4.1.

  To work around the problem, you can concatenate this string in your application, allowing you to avoid this logic. For example,.

  SELECT MYCOLA, MYCOLB, MYCOLC FROM MYTABLEA WHERE MYPHONE LIKE '%2 '. 2306 ' %';

  Thanks again.

  Joel

• How do I dynamically change the query VO

  Hello
  
  IAM trying to change the VO query dynamically. My forced, it is that I have 6 columns in a page header 3 columns (single default) for objective sort and another 3 columns (the default one) for querying data.
  
  Al, are in a single view so I created a VO.
  
  Sort of research
  AN A
  B B
  C C
  
  When I give all sort values and hit the query of VO submit button should change dynamically.
  I searched old post in this regard.
  
  My query is something like that
  
  SELECT * from cust_table where a = NVL (: 1, a)
  UNION
  SELECT * from cust_table where a <>NVL (: 1, a)
  order by one
  
  IAM not trying the Sub part dynamicaly in my AM method
  vo.setWherecaluse ("where a = NVL (: 1, a)")
  UNION
  SELECT * from cust_table where a <>NVL (: 1, a)
  order by one ").
  and trying to pass parameters to the query. But it does not work. In error "variable binding is not found.
  
  The one you suggest how to solve the problem.
  
  
  Thank you
  Mahesh

  Mahesh

  Please let me know the logic behind the union of the same query with it. What is the problem you are having with
  vo.setWhereClause

  Thank you
  AJ

• ATG-short integration - change the query of the user's search term before being sent to short

  All testing the ATG-short front-end search/browse integration in a commerce application of my organization, one of our QA team members noticed as a search term consisting of just a vertical pipe character ("" | "") would cause the full product catalog to return in the results of research, as if every product in the catalogue was a match to that search term.

  This behavior can be seen in the Application of reference short JSP as well, so that this behavior does not appear to be caused by something that makes our custom application code.

  It is an undesirable behavior for our application - the company prefers that we do not show the entire catalog of products at the same time unless he is cut down somehow (whether via a word search or by the application of filters of properties).

  I plan to implement a solution to wash just ' | ' characters of the search term entry.  It would be pretty easy to do on the client side, but as with any other web application input validation, we really want to do this on the side server.

  I think that this should be done by the substitution of / expand part of the OOTB ATG pipeline where it sends the search request to short for treatment.  However, this is not something I've done before.  I read in Chapter 7 of the ATGEndecaIntegrationGuide.pdf ("application integration"), but it's not immediately obvious to me how/where I'd be better on the substitution of / extend an OOTB ATG component for making filter ' | ' characters in the search query term.

  All the world is this kind of thing before?  If so, could you please describe how you went to?

  Thank you!

  -Jon

  I ended up implementing this as follows:

  -Create a new class that extends the class InvokeAssembler;

  -Implement a custom InvokeAssembler.properties file that points to my new class derived;

  -In service () of the new derived class method, use methods of the DynamoHttpServletRequest to filter pipe characters in the value of the Ntt parameter and the query string.  Then call super.service () to handle the demand.

  -Jon

• Change the image loading of counting

  Hello
  I want to change the image to my custom default image loading. There are a few style class availabe.
  
  AF | document: splash-screen.
  AF | document: splash-screen-cell
  AF | document: splash-screen-content
  AF | document: splash-screen-icon
  AF | document: splash-screen-message
  
  
  Can someone tell me what class style to use to change the loading image?
  
  Thank you
  $N
  
  Published by: Sidibé Gandhi on May 4, 2011 06:58

  Change this entry for skin. the following excerpt comes from a skin of fusion style - desktop.css

  / * Splash screen icon * /.
  AF | document: splash-screen-icon {}
  content: url(/afr/ss.gif);
  Width: 43px;
  height: 48px;
  vertical-align: middle;
  }

• Links user to change the query option

  I know it's a simple thing to do...
  
  I have an example query:
  
  < name cfquery = 'day' datasource = "" >
  
  Select logday
  of tbl_log
  WHERE logday = "Tuesday".
  
  < / cfquery >
  
  I want to have a drop down menu where there is say a list of days, Monday > Sunday. When the user choices say Friday it then changes WHERE logday = 'Friday ';
  
  I can't work work how to get the link to work. Should I combine it with a cfset?
  
  Thank you
  
  James

  You train with the drop-down list of the day, you want to your select to look like the code below. Then on your action page, your where clause should resemble:
  WHERE logday = 'form.selectedDay. '

• Somehow changed the direction of my counter top. How do I put back so that desktop display normally?

  Desktop

  Try pressing Ctrl + Alt + arrow keys pointing UPWARDS.

  See you soon. Mick Murphy - Microsoft partner

• Tuning for sql join key table no consumer of the heavy use of the query processor

  Obligation comes to tunne prod of the query in
  

  high use of the query processor

  sql_id: fp79wb32h7a6t

  Module: AHC, P_PatientDQ()

  Cost: 7

  Elapsed time: hung

  Status: Hung, 35,253,460 day at 30 minute intervals

  -Create table

  create table ahc. PATIENTVISITS

  (

  ahcid NUMBER,

  visitId NUMBER,

  visitstatus NVARCHAR2 (100),

  visitdate DATE,

  visitintime DATE,

  visitouttime DATE

  )

  -Create/recreate the index

  create indexes ahc. F1_PATIENTVISIT_AHCID on ahc. PATIENTVISITS (AHCID, VISITID);

  create indexes ahc. VISITDATE_IDX on ahc. PATIENTVISITS (TRUNC (VISITDATE));

  First total number of table

  Select count (1) of

  Pvs AHC.patientvisits

  -Save County 1387485

  create table ahc. PATIENTDEPENDENTVISITS

  (

  ahcid NUMBER (19) not null,

  IDPack NUMBER (10) not null,

  visitId NUMBER (19) not null,

  dependentvisitid NUMBER (19) not null,

  isdiabetic NUMBER (2)

  )

  -Create/recreate the index

  create indexes ahc. K1_PATIENTDEPENDENT_AHCID on ahc. PATIENTDEPENDENTVISITS (AHCID);

  Total number of second table

  Select count (1) of

  AHC.patientdependentvisits POS

  -Save County 774599

  Original request:

  SELECT count (*)

  ACH. PVS PATIENTVISITS

  WHERE PVS. VISITID IN (SELECT POS. DEPENDENTVISITID

  ACH. PATIENTDEPENDENTVISITS POS

  WHERE POS. AHCID = 37

  AND POS. VISITID = 218

  AND POS. ISDIABETIC = 0)

  AND SUPERIOR (PVS. VISITSTATUS) = 'PENDING'

  AND PVS. AHCID = 37

  Count (1)

  -----------

  1

  PL/sql Developer explain plan for the original query

  Owner of description Objects_name cost cardin bytes cpucost cost of e/s

  SELECT STATEMENT, GOAL = ALL_ROWS			7	1	41	63669	7
  AGGREGATION OF TRI				1	41
  SEMI OF THE NESTED LOOPS			7	1	41	63669	7
  TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID	AHC	PATIENTVISITS	4	1	25	33295	4
  INDEX RANGE SCAN	AHC	F1_PATIENTVISIT_AHCID	3	9		23164	3
  TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID	AHC	PATIENTDEPENDENTVISITS	3	1	16	30375	3
  INDEX RANGE SCAN	AHC	K1_PATIENTDEPENDENT_AHCID	2	14		18093	2

  After editing the query

  SELECT / * + FIRST_ROWS * / COUNT (1)

  ACH. PVS PATIENTVISITS

  JOIN THE AHC. PATIENTDEPENDENTVISITS POS ON PVS. VISITID = POS. DEPENDENTVISITID

  WHERE PVS. AHCID = POS. AHCID

  AND POS. AHCID = 37

  AND POS. VISITID = 218

  AND POS. ISDIABETIC = 0

  AND SUPERIOR (PVS. VISITSTATUS) = 'PENDING'

  Count (1)

  -----------

  1

  PL/sql Developer explain plan for change request

  Owner of description Objects_name cost cardin bytes cpucost cost of e/s

  SELECT STATEMENT, TARGET = TIP: FIRST_ROWS			7	1	41	59257	7
  AGGREGATION OF TRI				1	41
  NESTED LOOPS
  NESTED LOOPS			7	1	41	59257	7
  TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID	AHC	PATIENTDEPENDENTVISITS	4	1	16	36646	4
  INDEX RANGE SCAN	AHC	K1_PATIENTDEPENDENT_AHCID	3	14		24364	3
  INDEX RANGE SCAN	AHC	F1_PATIENTVISIT_AHCID	2	1		15293	2
  TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID	AHC	PATIENTVISITS	3	1	25	22611	3

  here after I changed the query no display cost = 7 io wait = improvement also 7 can someone please help these

  How to adjust or rewrite lots of join not keys to multiple records on table table

  Thank you

  VSM

  you have not answered my question. Are you really calling it 35 million times in 30 minutes?

  If so, why?

• Slow index by using the query. Fast with full table Scan.

  Salvation;
  
  (Thanks for the links)
  
  Here's my question correctly formatted.
  
  The query:

  SELECT count(1)
  from ehgeoconstru  ec 
  where ec.TYPE='BAR'  
  AND ( ec.birthDate <= TO_DATE('2009-10-06 11:52:12', 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS') )   
  and deathdate is null 
  and substr(ec.strgfd, 1, length('[CIMText')) <> '[CIMText'

  Works on 32 seconds!
  
  
  Same query, but with an extra where clause:

  SELECT count(1)
  from ehgeoconstru  ec 
  where ec.TYPE='BAR'  
  and  ( (ec.contextVersion = 'REALWORLD')     --- ADDED HERE
  AND ( ec.birthDate <= TO_DATE('2009-10-06 11:52:12', 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS') ) )  
  and deathdate is null 
  and substr(ec.strgfd, 1, length('[CIMText')) <> '[CIMText'

  This is 400 seconds.
  
  It should return data from a table, given the conditions.
  
  The database version is Oracle9i Release 9.2.0.7.0
  
  These are the parameters relevant for the optimizer:
  

  SQL> show parameter optimizer
  
  NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
  ------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------
  optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     1
  optimizer_features_enable            string      9.2.0
  optimizer_index_caching              integer     99
  optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     10
  optimizer_max_permutations           integer     2000
  optimizer_mode                       string      CHOOSE
  
  SQL> 

  Here is the output of the PLAN to EXPLAIN for the first quick query:
  

  PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  | Id  | Operation                     |  Name               | Rows  | Bytes | Cost  |
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT     |                         |           |       |       |
  |   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE       |                         |           |       |       |
  |*  2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL   | EHCONS            |       |       |       |
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
  ---------------------------------------------------
  
  PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
     2 - filter(SUBSTR("EC"."strgfd",1,8)<>'[CIMText' AND "EC"."DEATHDATE"
                IS NULL AND "EC"."BIRTHDATE"<=TO_DATE('2009-10-06 11:52:12', 'yyyy
  -mm-dd
  
                hh24:mi:ss') AND "EC"."TYPE"='BAR')
  
  Note: rule based optimization

  Here is the output of the EXPLAIN of PLAN for slow queries:

  PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     |       |
  
  |   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE              |                             |       |
     |       |
  
  |*  2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ehgeoconstru      |       |
     |       |
  
  |*  3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | ehgeoconstru_VSN  |       |
     |       |
  
  
  PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
  ---------------------------------------------------
  2 - filter(SUBSTR("EC"."strgfd",1,8)<>'[CIMText' AND "EC"."DEATHDATE" IS
   NULL AND "EC"."TYPE"='BAR')
  
  PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     3 - access("EC"."CONTEXTVERSION"='REALWORLD' AND "EC"."BIRTHDATE"<=TO_DATE('2
  009-10-06
  
                11:52:12', 'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))
         filter("EC"."BIRTHDATE"<=TO_DATE('2009-10-06 11:52:12', 'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:
  mi:ss'))
  
  
  Note: rule based optimization

  The TKPROF output for this slow statement is:

  TKPROF: Release 9.2.0.7.0 - Production on Tue Nov 17 14:46:32 2009
  
  Copyright (c) 1982, 2002, Oracle Corporation.  All rights reserved.
  
  Trace file: gen_ora_3120.trc
  Sort options: prsela  exeela  fchela  
  ********************************************************************************
  count    = number of times OCI procedure was executed
  cpu      = cpu time in seconds executing 
  elapsed  = elapsed time in seconds executing
  disk     = number of physical reads of buffers from disk
  query    = number of buffers gotten for consistent read
  current  = number of buffers gotten in current mode (usually for update)
  rows     = number of rows processed by the fetch or execute call
  ********************************************************************************
  
  SELECT count(1)
  from ehgeoconstru  ec
  where ec.TYPE='BAR'
  and  ( (ec.contextVersion = 'REALWORLD')
  AND ( ec.birthDate <= TO_DATE('2009-10-06 11:52:12', 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS') ) )
  and deathdate is null
  and substr(ec.strgfd, 1, length('[CIMText')) <> '[CIMText'
  
  call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
  ------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------
  Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
  Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
  Fetch        2      0.00     538.12     162221    1355323          0           1
  ------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------
  total        4      0.00     538.12     162221    1355323          0           1
  
  Misses in library cache during parse: 0
  Optimizer goal: CHOOSE
  Parsing user id: 153  
  
  Rows     Row Source Operation
  -------  ---------------------------------------------------
        1  SORT AGGREGATE 
    27747   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID OBJ#(73959) 
  2134955    INDEX RANGE SCAN OBJ#(73962) (object id 73962)
  
  ********************************************************************************
  
  alter session set sql_trace=true
  
  
  call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
  ------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------
  Parse        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
  Execute      1      0.00       0.02          0          0          0           0
  Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
  ------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------
  total        1      0.00       0.02          0          0          0           0
  
  Misses in library cache during parse: 0
  Misses in library cache during execute: 1
  Optimizer goal: CHOOSE
  Parsing user id: 153  
  
  
  
  ********************************************************************************
  
  OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL NON-RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
  
  call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
  ------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------
  Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
  Execute      2      0.00       0.02          0          0          0           0
  Fetch        2      0.00     538.12     162221    1355323          0           1
  ------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------
  total        5      0.00     538.15     162221    1355323          0           1
  
  Misses in library cache during parse: 0
  Misses in library cache during execute: 1
  
  
  OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
  
  call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
  ------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------
  Parse        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
  Execute      0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
  Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
  ------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------
  total        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
  
  Misses in library cache during parse: 0
  
      2  user  SQL statements in session.
      0  internal SQL statements in session.
      2  SQL statements in session.
  ********************************************************************************
  Trace file: gen_ora_3120.trc
  Trace file compatibility: 9.02.00
  Sort options: prsela  exeela  fchela  
         2  sessions in tracefile.
         2  user  SQL statements in trace file.
         0  internal SQL statements in trace file.
         2  SQL statements in trace file.
         2  unique SQL statements in trace file.
        94  lines in trace file.

  Published by: PauloSMO on November 17, 2009 04:21
  
  Published by: PauloSMO on November 17, 2009 07:07
  
  Published by: PauloSMO on November 17, 2009 07:38 - title changed to be more correct.

  Although your optimizer_mode is choosing, it seems that there are no statistics collected on ehgeoconstru. The absence of estimated costs and estimated row counts of each of the stages of the plan and the "Note: optimization based on rules" at the end of these two plans would tend to confirm this.

  Optimizer_mode choose means that if statistics are collected then it will use the CBO, but if no statistic is present in any of the tables in the query, the optimizer to rule will be used. The RBO tends to be happy in the best of the index case. I guess the index ehgeoconstru_VSN contextversion as the main column and also includes the date of birth.

  You can either gather statistics on the table (if all other tables have statistics) using dbms_stats.gather_table_stats, or suggest the query to use a full scan instead of index. Another solution would be to apply a function or an operation against the contextversion to prevent the use of the index. something like this:

  SELECT COUNT(*)
  FROM ehgeoconstru  ec
  WHERE ec.type='BAR' and
        ec.contextVersion||'' = 'REALWORLD'
        ec.birthDate <= TO_DATE('2009-10-06 11:52:12', 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS') and
        deathdate is null and
        SUBSTR(ec.strgfd, 1, LENGTH('[CIMText')) <> '[CIMText'
  

  or maybe UPPER (ec.contextVersion) so that would not change the rows returned.

  John

• How can I change the contents of the 'most visited' in the Menu bar

  Once Firefox stores 10 entries in "Most visited", there seems to be no way to change these entries (e.g. the installation program "Most visited" while it contains links to Web sites that I want under "Most visited").

  When you search Firefox HELP 'most visited' you don't even no matter what success there.

  You don't control that made the request, you can change the query, you can prefer 20 hits instead. The search for the address bar with the "AwesomeBar" feature might be more to your liking. In any case do not remove the entries in "Most visited" as you would remove real history

  Most visited - bookmark smart folders - recently visited (history)

  https://support.Mozilla.com/questions/831554

  https://support.Mozilla.com/questions/858163#answer-225990

  After the creation of the bookmark to a "smart folder", you must, restart Firefox, after which the bookmark looks like a folder and will work properly.

  related: https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Smart%20Bookmarks%20folders (marked old)

  related: http://kb.mozillazine.org/Viewing_the_browsing_history_-_Firefox

  AwesomeBar feature allows you to search your history and bookmarks in the location bar to (forward) press "Enter". See the address bar search (internal - full Auto)

  See picture of some: I use the AwsomeBar internal search function-related configuration parameters.

• To get the result of the query as the column format delimited

  Hi all

  I'm running under query to get database information using an automation tool. The output of the query we receive does not come with the defined value. Is there a way I can change the query to output delimited?

  Please provide your valuable contributions

  SELECT * FROM THE USER. DROP_DOWN_VALUE

  WHERE (SELEC_ID IN (SELECT ID FROM THE USER. PLACE WHERE FIELD_NAME = 'TABLE_NAME'))

  AND DEPENDENT_FIELD = 'XXXXXXX '.

  
  

  The query output:

  
  

  43202TRANSFORMERTRANSFORMERXXXXXXX

  
  

  Expected results:

  
  

  43202, TRANSFORMER, TRANSFORMER, XXXXXXX

  
  

  Thanks and greetings

  Riyas Hussain
  

  I'm running under query to get database information using an automation tool. The output of the query we receive does not come with the defined value. Is there a way I can change the query to output delimited?

  Just add / * csv * / in front of the query.

  See examples of different formats in this article by Sql Dev PM Jeff Smith (a frequent contributor of forum):

  http://www.thatjeffsmith.com/archive/2012/05/formatting-query-results-to-CSV-in-Oracle-SQL-Developer/

  SELECT / * csv * / * FROM scott.emp;

  SELECT / * xml * / * FROM scott.emp;

  SELECT / * html * / * FROM scott.emp;

  SELECT / * delimited * / * FROM scott.emp;

  SELECT / * INSERT * / * FROM scott.emp;

  SELECT / * charger * / * FROM scott.emp;

  SELECT / * fixed * / * FROM scott.emp;

  SELECT / * text * / * FROM scott.emp;

• Help with the query to select only one record from the result set in double

  Hello

  Please help with the query. Version of Oracle database we use is 10g R2.

  I have a vision that is duplicated IDS, but they are used across the different functions. See below examples of data. Please help me with a query to select only one record (based on ID regardless of the area) from the bottom of the result set of duplicate records. For what is the point of view is there unique records, given the combination of the fields ID, Org, DF, dry, Sub-Sec

  ID	Org	DF	Sec	Sub-Sec

  
  (163)CQCPDMCPDMHD(163)PCENGENGENG(163)CQASICASICIS8888TSTACTACTAC(163)TSHEHESW6789CQINFOINFOFOS6789PCSECSYSSECSYSINFO16789TSSECSYSSECSYSINFO29009PCBMSBMSBMS1

  My result set must eliminate the duplicate identifiers regardless of whoever we choose of the result set. (I mean without distinction Org, DF, s, Sub-s). My expected result set should be.

  ID	DSB

  
  DF
  SEC
  Sub-Sec
  (163)CQCPDMCPDMHD8888TSTACTACTAC6789CQINFOINFOFOS9009PCBMSBMSBMS1

  
  

  Thank you

  Orton
  

  Hello

  This sounds like a job for ROW_NUMBER:

  WITH got_r_num AS

  (

  SELECT id, DSB, df, s, sub_sec org

  ROW_NUMBER () OVER (PARTITION BY ID.

  ORDER BY org

  ) AS r_num

  OF view_x

  )

  SELECT id, DSB, df, sub_sec s,

  OF got_r_num

  WHERE r_num = 1

  ;

  He is a Top - N query example, where you choose the elements of N (N = 1 in this case) from the top of an ordered list.

  I hope that answers your question.
  If not, post a small example of data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT, only relevant columns instructions) to your sample data and the results desired from these data.  (I know that you said that you were a view selection.  Just for this thread, pretending it is a picture and post simple CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements to simulate your point of view).
  Point where the above query is to produce erroneous results, and explain, using specific examples, how you get the right results from data provided in these places.  (I didn't quite understand the explanation above.  I don't know why you want to

  ID ORG DF DRY SUB_SEC

  --      ---     --      ---     -------

  1234 CQ DPRK DPRK HD

  and is not

  1234 IS CQ ASIC, ASIC

  or

  TS 1234 IT IT SW

  or

  1234 CQ ASIC ASIC HD

  )
  If you change the query at all, post your modified version.
  Always say what version of Oracle you are using (for example, 11.2.0.2.0).

  See the FAQ forum: https://forums.oracle.com/message/9362002