Choice VPN

Similar Questions

• Decide what devices are a good choice for vpn

  Hello world

  I need help to decide which cisco devices are the best choice for connecting vpn between Headquarters and 14 remote sites where are remote sites don't connect to HQ and does not connect to each other and what software and licenses are required

  Thank you

  C881-K9 standard comes by default with a license of advanced security. There is an Advanced IP license option for more routing options. For 4331, the DRY Bundle is necessary. The options are given in the data sheets that I linked in the previous answer.

• Can someone help me open a trustworthy VPN provider?

  I live in Germany and as a beginner, I need to find a trustworthy VPN provider. Can someone give me some advice?

  Hello, Buddy

  Your best bet is to look for customers who are not self-promotion of providers or paid ads.

  It greatly depends on what you want in a VPN, there are always compromises.

  I used a VPN from the beginning of the 2000s.  I'll try to find some links to test for you.

  Edit

  (1) this site is comprehensive and supposedly neutral

  https://thatoneprivacysite.NET/

  The creator has some good advice for choosing a VPN

  https://thatoneprivacysite.NET/choosing-the-best-VPN-for-you/

  Note the caveat, here:

  You have begun your search for a VPN by searching for "VPN Clients" in your search engine of choice. If you had, you would have rated page at a time, to what appear to be harmless review sites, top 10 or blog style customers different VPN services. You can even come here for confirmation of what have said you on these sites. The sites of these recommendations are, in almost all cases, paid for by services that they review and recommend. They start their business relationship with you, with what is essentially a lie. The technical term for this kind of marketing is "native of advertising" and it is the abuse is a huge problem in the VPN industry. I deliberately made a point to capture such data on my comparison table of the VPN. You will find information on services that have affiliate programs, the specific policies they have for them and whether or not the affiliates act ethically, essentially it services to tolerate those who represent them, when it comes to persuade to buy in the information they put out.

  A note because you are using a Mac, Buddy:

  I'd be careful about the use of sites that download software VPN on your Mac without verification and double feedback from users of these programs over the years.  Although I used a VPN for more than 15 years I'm still looking for something else.  And I have been experimenting with other VPN providers and downloaded apps that not only did not work as promised but was very difficult to remove from my system. So be judicious in your research.

• [DEV] Kernel module for Open on Thinkpad Tablet TUN VPN support

  Since your rooting TPT is not a big problem now, it's time to enrich the tablet with powerful features - one of them is the support for OpenVPN. As with all other tablets based Tegra2 we have to flash a TUN/TAP on TPT kernel module. We have two choices:

  1. someone confirms that we can reuse just modules written for other tablets: like this thread for example: [Acer A500]

  2. or we need someone to write them for our tablet.

  Unfortunately, I'm not that experienced with Linux systems.

  phinpan is right. All you have to do is install tun.ko market Installer, run it, add additional details (I didin't) press on install. If she tells you, do not take into account that this module is not compatible. After using the tun.ko Installer, just download installer OpenVPN and OpenVPN market parameters. First run the OpenVPN Setup, follow the instructions and then start OpenVPN settings. It took less than 5 minutes and now I'm protected by my VPN provider.

• VPN AND REMOTE NETWORKS TUNNELS

  Having problems become place SEW to connect you to the location of the SERVER @ HOM

  I think ideally the RVS4000 should be at location HOM

  I tried to configure static routes to HOM sewing, but they never show in the Routing Table

  I tried to enable RIP on all 3 routers

  Here is my set up

  CDM - SBS 2008 accommodation location
  RVL200LAN 192.168.0.1 - no DHCP
  VPN for GROUND location

  GROUND location
  RVS4000LAN 192.168.1.1 - DHCP
  SEW the VPN for HOM location and location

  SEW the location

  RVL200 192.168.2.1 - DHCP

  VPN for GROUND location

  Any help would be great

  Configure a VPN between SEW and HOM tunnel.

  These routers implement regular IPSec tunnels. IPSec tunnels only packages that exactly match the remote and local security groups. You cannot route packets to SEW by GROUND HOM. A package of SEW HOM has source IP * 192.168.2 and destination IP address 192.168.0. *. This does not match your VPN tunnel between 192.168.2. * and 192.168.1. *. So your access attempt is also sent in the clear on the internet.

  You must configure a VPN tunnel. There's no other choice. These IPSec tunnels do not have routable interfaces.

• RVL200 and Windows 2000 Server - can not access network resources via VPN

  I am new to the VPN, and I feel I'm missing something very basic in my configuration. I just installed a RVL200 as the gateway for my corporate network router.  The network includes a Windows 2000 Server that acts as server DHCP and several PC and a printer.  I was able to "establish a SSL VPN tunnel" home connection to the router, but after recording in everything I see is the screen of virtual Passage - one with lock icons - otherwise I am inside the router.  The statement shows that I am connected.  Once the tunnel is established, what am I supposed to do to get computers to the computers on my network?  I can ping all computers on the network using their LAN address.  I'm supposed to see a choice of network resources to get to this point?  I put the router as a trusted site in the server and even tried to disable all firewalls, but I see that the VPN screen with icons.  I don't know how to proceed from here because I don't know what I'm supposed to see.  Thanks for any help that you can give to a newbie!

  The SSL connection is only for the VPN router. To access the computer, you can use Windows Remote Desktop connection. So that you can access to remote computers on the network, or you could look for 3 third-party software for remote access

  Hope this helps

• I want to know how to put my vista as a vpn server, so I can connect from work?

  I have Vista Home Basic! and I want it to be VPN server so this way I can access resources on this subject. After researching I found that a customer who wants to set up a private network virtual assigned must address PUBLIC IP. Please ask me I would thank you for it!

  None of the editions of Windows Welcome in native mode allow remote connections from an external PC.  In addition, your own home network router should protect your LAN House of this type of connection.  If you want to connect to your home PC, you need to set your router firewall to allow incoming connections on a port of your choice (not standard ports for incoming connections) and you will ned to install a program such as VNC to accept the incoming connection.  Alternatively, you can buy a service like GoToMyPC (http://gotomypc.com/) that will secure your home firewall courses.

  Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]
  --------------------------------
  https://MVP.support.Microsoft.com/profile/Brian.Tillman
  If a response may help, please vote it as useful. If a response to the problem, please mark it as an answer.

• Global VPN Client for Apple

  I've recently deployed a SonicWALL NSA2600 and have implemented a VPN site-to site both group WAN VPN that work properly. I distributed global vpn client for users who need access to network resources. However, a user uses exclusively based Apple operating systems. Y at - it a customer vpn global for Apple, or is the app of choice? If there is no other choice, this mobile app will work for a desktop Apple computer?

  Thank you

  Jason

  This link is more accurate for MacOS.

  Installation and use NetExtender on MacOS:

  

• Can I have a copy of KB2982791? My client VPN application

  Original title: Please, please, please can I have a copy of KB2982791? My client VPN application

  Yes, I am aware that MS has w / drew this patch.

  However, I don't have the choice. I SHOULD have the patch and am willing to take the risk. My client is a Government, and their VPN is administered by people who insist that I have this patch in order to do my job.

  Can I PLEASE have the patch? If my system has problems, I'll take the risk. I can't change my client--their admins VPN will ALWAYS REQUIRE MS PATCHES, even if MS released their.

  I implore anyone who wants to hear it.

  Computers belongs to me - I'm an entrepreneur owner unique to Montgomery Co. MD [whose] VPN is administered by people who insist that I have this patch in order to do my job.

  Well, I'm afraid that you are between the proverbial rock and hard place, my friend.

  KB2982791 was "fired" shortly before midnight (Pacific time) on August 15, 2014. KB2982791 is no longer available through Windows Update. KB2982791 is no longer available via the MS Download Center or from the Microsoft Update Catalog. In addition, Microsoft informed uninstall KB2982791 if it is currently installed.

  If the admins of the County cannot understand the FAQ update on this page...

  
  Why this bulletin has been revised August 15, 2014?
  Microsoft revised this bulletin to address known issues related to the installation of security update 2982791. Microsoft is investigating the behavior associated with the installation of this update and will update this bulletin when more information is available. Microsoft recommends customers to uninstall this update. As an additional precaution, Microsoft has removed the 2982791 security update download links. For instructions on how to uninstall this update, see Microsoft Knowledge Base Article 2982791.

  .. .you need to slam a few heads together (or contact their TAM Microsoft).

  I suspect upgrading kernel (MS14-045) re-Mode drivers - will be released very soon (for example, early next week?), probably under a new KB number. [Those who say cannot know & those who say can't know.]

  Good luck on Monday morning!

  PS: Here is the consumer, specific peer-to-peer support forums. You'd better post in Win7 IT Pro-specifiques forums-online http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windows/en-US/home#category=w7itpro [or in the forums partner if you are a MS Partner]

• ASA5505 for configuration VPN Failover ASA-5510

  the best way to configure a second VPN tunnel by another carrier, to fail.  The two tunnels would go to the same network a Remote Site.   Is it possible to apply a metric or monitor the tunnel so that if the choice we're unavailable two choice would resume.   Can you point me to the example configuration preferably with ADSM?

  Hi Stewart,

  Please visit this link for the same thing:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/blog/150001

  Kind regards

  Aditya

  Please evaluate the useful messages and mark the correct answers.

• New VPN

  I intend to create a new site to site VPN tunnel. I have a 2811ISR on the end of the office and the remote end will be traveling around the world for trainers to carry, which means that the remote endpoint will use a dynamic public IP address whenever they are trying to connect from. I have a spare 3002, but I need to supply more than 1 device for all coaches to carry with them. What would be the Unit recommended for this type of installation?

  Ahh ok, thanks for the clarification.

  The VPN 3002 is end of life now, so you can not buy these. Is the same for the small boxes of PIX. Your best choice would be the ASA 5505 now. Its also is pretty and is convenient to carry all :)

  Concerning

  Farrukh

• AnyConnect + possible PSK (pre-shared key) as under with cisco vpn client ikev1 and ikev2

  Is it possible to create a VPN Anyconnect of RA with just the name of user and password + pre-shared key (Group) for the connection, as could do for ikev1 with cisco VPN client? I am running 8.4.X ASA code and looks like tunnel-group commands have 8.2.X somewhat change. If you change the group type of the tunnel for remote access, now there is no option for IKEv2 PSK. This is only available when you choose the type

  Type of TG_TEST FW1 (config) # tunnel - group?

  set up the mode commands/options:
  Site IPSec IPSec-l2l group
  Remote access using IPSec-IPSec-ra (DEPRECATED) group
  remote access remote access (IPSec and WebVPN) group
  WebVPN WebVPN Group (DEPRECATED)

  FW1(config-tunnel-General) # tunnel - group TG_TEST ipsec-attributes
  FW1(config-tunnel-IPSec) #?

  configuration of the tunnel-group commands:
  any required authorization request users to allow successfully in order to
  Connect (DEPRECATED)
  Allow chain issuing of the certificate
  output attribute tunnel-group IPSec configuration
  mode
  help help for group orders of tunnel configuration
  IKEv1 configure IKEv1
  ISAKMP policy configure ISAKMP
  not to remove a pair of attribute value
  by the peer-id-validate Validate identity of the peer using the peer
  certificate
  negotiation to Enable password update in RADIUS RADIUS with expiry
  authentication (DEPRECATED)

  FW1(config-tunnel-IPSec) # ikev1?

  the tunnel-group-ipsec mode commands/options:
  pre-shared key associate a key shared in advance with the connection policy

  I'm getting old so I hope that it is not in another complaint curmudgeonly on the loss of functionality. :)

  Many small businesses do not want to invest in the PKI. It is usually a pain to deploy, backup, make redundant, etc..

  But it would be nice to have a bit more security on VPN other than just the connections of username and password.

  If this is not possible, it is possible to configure the Anyconnect customer to IKEv1 with PSK and name at the level of the Group client?

  If this is not possible, WTH did cisco end customer VPN cisco as a choice of VPN connection (other than to get more fresh mail of license)?

  I really hope that something like this exists still!

  THX,

  WR

  You are welcome

  In addition to two factors, you can also do double authentication (ie the two using the user name and password). Each set of credentials can come from a Bank of different identities.

  With this scheme, you can can configure a local user name (common) with password on the SAA (think of it as your analog PSK) and the other be the AD user identification information.

• Types of Vpn"

  Hi all

  It is a matter totally newbie but here's...

  It is written in some places, the L2TP, PPTP and GRE are types of vpn tunnels, if for example you can create a dialer L2TP and (after authentication), it will form a tunnel L2TP, which you can wrap in a GRE tunnel

  first of all, what is the need for this? Because L2TP allows to transfer any layer 3 Protocol. you need top GRE?

  the other thing is, in some texts, there are explanations on the configuration a L2TP on the LAKE and the LNS and of course as a dialer to the client end. no free WILL. so... what exactly? is it a tunnel? What is a dialer? is it two? What are the differences, and when I would prefer one over the other?

  Ipsec, isakamp, encryption, mapping all phases are well understood. My confusion is these types different tunnel/dialer.

  Thanks in advance,

  Willow

  Dear friends,

  Let me join you.

  (1) what is the difference between L2TP and GRE? they need IPSec and are has a few tunnels, while L2TP is also a dialer via PPP/PPPoe to connect to the ISP.

  L2TP is used to encapsulate and tunnel set Layer2 frameworks (e.g. Ethernet, HDLC, PPP, Frame Relay, or ATM) including their payload. GRE is used to encapsulate and tunnel Layer 3 packets (such as IPv4 or IPv6). There are other significant differences between free WILL and L2TP, but at this stage, I consider it the most important distinction between them. In other words, if you consider a tunnel to a pipe, and then with L2TP, you would be feeding Layer2 frames in this pipe and with free WILL, you could feed Layer 3 packets in this pipe. The choice of L2TP or free WILL depends on the application - whether you need tunnel frames together because they are sent by the source, or if you just need packages of origin without their tunnel link layer encapsulation.

  In fact, there is an exception to the above rules that may make things more confusing. You can also tunnel Layer2 executives through tunnels GRE as well. The trick is to know what kind of frame you syringe in a GRE packet. If you look more closely the format of the header 4 bytes to the base address WILL, the first 2 bytes specify version GRE and indicators and the 2 following bytes have the same meaning as the EtherType Ethernet field: they identify the type of payload of the GRE packet. If there is a valid EtherType value recorded for the frame you want to carry through a GRE tunnel, then by all means, you can create a tunnel it. If there is no registered EtherType value then you are in trouble because you can't invent a value and put it there - maybe receiver endpoint do not understand the value, or it can it be confused with another protocol and process encapsulated incorrectly frame. All the common Layer 3 protocols have their EtherType recorded because they are intended to be carried in Ethernet frames, so with Layer 3 packets, we generally have no problem. However, not all the Layer2 protocols have their EtherTypes because tunneling frames within other frames is not a common practice. This is why the nature of the ACCORD as a Layer 3 mainly tunneling protocol.

  Just for your convenience, you can find the list of EtherType values to

  http://standards-Oui.IEEE.org/EtherType/ETH.txt

  L2TP or IPsec need se GRE. The two protocols of defintion will happily run without IPsec, but then, of course, they will carry all data encrypted and unprotected. IPsec is an add-on to the two protocols to ensure data transmission security (authentication, confidentiality, integrity, protection against replay attacks).

  By saying "L2TP is also a dialer via PPP/PPPoE to connect to the ISP" you want to say probably virtual-PPP interface - am I wrong? Can you clarify this more in detail?

  (2) what is the Protocol-point difference charged and tunnel point-to-point protocol? since they both are supported on non - IP traffic

  PPP is a protocol of Layer2 and is intended to be run directly through the physical network interfaces. It is not a tunneling protocol, it is rather a protocol binding to data originally created to be used on interfaces series of computers and routers. He replaced or complete other binding protocols series such as SLIP or HDLC. Regarding the installation of the OSI model, PPP is on the same layer that Ethernet - both run through the physical network interfaces and define how two directly connected network interfaces to send messages between them.

  PPTP is a tunneling protocol that uses a modification of the GRE protocol and Protocol additional signs to tunnel PPP frames in IP packets on a routed network. It's the confusing thing, PPTP: she uses GRE to tunnel PPP frames and only PPP frames. You can't see other types of PPTP traffic directly - it was not designed to function this way even if the Agreement itself would be able to do this. Instead, what you want to carry on a PPTP tunnel must first be put in PPP frames, and they will get so encapsulated WILL and sent on the tunnel on the other side.

  The fact that the PPP is used inside PPTP does not imply that the PPP was invented with PPTP in mind. It actually has the opposite - PPP existed well before PPTP and creators of felt PPTP that it would be beneficial to use because it provides some features neat it otherwise would re-implement (authentication, superior negotiation of the Protocol, the IP autoconfiguration to name a few). The fact that the PPP is used inside PPTP does not have PPP, only a tunneling protocol; PPP is rather just a "victim" of PPTP.

  PPTP is not a data link layer protocol, it is not directly used on any type of physical interface, on the contrary: PPTP expects connectivity IP base (using any type of data link layer and physical) between endpoints is already in place.

  (3) what about standalone (no GRE) PPTP? why they want PPTP running inside a GRE? How to get it? also, why can I not use PPTP with GRE and ipsec for security, or simply of PPTP with ipsec?  Why should I use L2TP? What is its benefits?

  PPTP consists internally of a somewhat modified GRE more additional control running on TCP channel which provides the installation of the tunnel and disassembly session. There is no such thing as a standalone without GRE PPTP: PPTP is Grateful, even if not a vanilla ACCORD, rather an adapted version of it.

  On the combination of PPTP and IPsec - technically, there nothing that would prevent you from protecting a PPTP with IPsec tunnel. It's just a unicast IP traffic and all this kind of traffic between two fixed end points can be protected by IPsec. If this combination is not available on a particular device or operating system, it is simply because this combination was never sufficiently strongly requested by customers to be implemented by providers.

  L2TP has the advantage of being richer, more widely supported and actively developed, but it was really designed to be used in environments of provider where hundreds or thousands of individual subscribers and their traffic are by tunnel between an access concentrator and a network server. These features are not used if the L2TP is terminated in a single user PC or router home. Of course, it has nothing bad about it, there just the L2TP is an excessive for such a small scale deployment. Yet, as it turns out, PPTP is considered to be more be simply outdated and not developed or maintained and L2TP is universally suggested as one of the possible replacements.

  (4) who is the dialer in GRE + IPSEC tunnel (or free WILL independent tunnel?) this Protocol is used? which layer 2 is used to make the connection?

  I'm not quite sure what you mean by the "dialer". With Volition, encapsulation is

  IP tunnel header. GRE header | Package originating IP

  This whole package is an IP packet, and is simply routed over the network to the tunnel endpoint, décapsulés-L2 and L2 encapsulated at each router according to the normal rules.

  (5) when you say GRE protocol 47 and ipsec uses the protocol 50 or 51 (esp / ah)-how the two, they meet? How to watch an encapsulation with these two protocols? What is used at each layer?

  Depending on whether IPsec is used in transport or tunnel mode, a GRE packet protected by IPsec looks like this:

  Tunnel mode:
  Intellectual property for the IPsec tunnel header. ESP / AH | GRE tunnel IP header | GRE header | Package originating IP

  Mode of transport:
  GRE tunnel IP header | ESP / AH | GRE header | Package originating IP

  With IPsec protection, the outer header (on the left shown) will always use the value of protocol 50/51. The value of Protocol 47 is engaged in the header of GRE IP tunnel (tunnel mode) or is moved to the ESP header's next header field / AH (mode of transport).

  (6) that LNS actually means "a L2TP server just insdie a router?

  LNS means L2TP Network Server and it peut - but does not need to-say that this feature is implemented in a network router. LNS is a software service, and it can be done either in the operating system (and perhaps partially in hardware) of a router, or it can be run on a server. There are implementations of the feature of LNS for Linux servers, for example.

  The terminology of the LAKE (L2TP Access Concentrator) and LNS (L2TP Network Server) is given by the RFCS that specify the use of L2TP. These RFCs do not oblige how or where these two elements are implemented. Any device that performs the tasks of LAKE or LNS is called a LAKE or a LNS, and either a dedicated router or even a PC or a raspberry Pi is not serious to L2TP.

  (7) if I come with a GRE tunnel and ipsec, I still need to use L2TP as dial-up at the end of the customer, I don't?

  Certainly not - the GRE tunnels create IP packages, and these IP packets will be routed to the other end of the tunnel through existing IP connectivity. Until you can have a GRE tunnel between two end points, you must have a connectivity IP to work between them (this is the same as for PPTP; after all, PPTP is based on the GRE). There is no need to use L2TP here. Even if encapsulate you the GRE in IPsec, you still get an IP packet that you can send to the other end of the tunnel, as there is already usable IP connectivity.

  Welcome to ask for more!

  Best regards
  Peter

• Duplicate remote Lan VPN subnets

  Hello Experts,

  I have 2 lans DISTANCE double connection via VPN with the ip address of 192.168.70.X and 192.168.70.x

  We are already working, but I don't know how to add the second that is listed

  exactly the same thing. Not clear how to apply the NAT on my Local router for the second subnet duplicate.

  I found this article but he speaks of lans in double on both sides, and it does NOT

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a00800b07ed.shtml

  Is there something similar, but with 2 LAN REMOTE subnets?

  Thank you

  Randall

  Hi, Randall

  As far as I know, you will have to do it on the remote end. The problem is that if you have the same address for example 192.168.1.70 arriving from two sites on the same time on your side VPN device will get very confused as to where the return traffic should pass.

  You can NAT IP source on your local router to a set of addresses 192.168.70.x addresses, but I still think that the VPN device would not be able to determine what tunnel to send traffic down on the way back.

  I appreciate it is not always easy to get the 3rd party to do something, but I think that that's your only choice.

  HTH

  Jon

• Capacity 7206VXRG2/ASB VPN

  Hello

  I need some info. to defend my choice to go Cisco-7206VXRG2/VSAVPNK9 for the aggregation of crypto against Juniper NS-5400.

  I am looking for specifically: -.

  -The maximum flow in Gbps on 3DES VPN

  -The maximum number of concurrent Sessions

  -The maximum number of VPN Tunnels

  Thanks in advance for any comments

  Saami

  Following links can help you

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/vpn_modules/vam_vsa/VSA/installation/guide/vsa_ov.html#wp1056032

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/routers/PS341/products_data_sheet0900aecd8047192f.html

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/routers/PS341/products_data_sheet0900aecd802c8530.html