Cisco No. 2851 with 2 - FPS?

Similar Questions

• the new iPad pro films with more FPS than the iPad2?

  the new iPad pro films with more FPS than the iPad2?

  Even as the iPad 2, 30 frames per second - the Pro allows you to make the slow-mo video at 120 FPS

• Router Cisco Small business with the functionality of the link aggregation

  Hi all!

  can someone tell me if there is a router from Cisco Small business with the functionality of the link aggregation? (I want to connect two 4 Mbps SDSL for flow)  The RV082 can do?

  Best regards

  You would need a RV016, who takes in charge up to 7 WAN ports. RV082 has only two WAN ports.

• Cisco VPN problem with security update KB3057839 for Vista

  Someone had problems with any connection Cisco VPN works after the installation of update of security KB3057839 for Vista? When this update is installed, the pop-up to enter the password and user id not come, need to use the Task Manager to close the program. The first time I went back to the restore point to get my VPN to work, this time I tried to reinstall the VPN but that doesn't work anymore. I started to uninstall updates (had 7 of them), when I got to it, KB3057839, the VPN began working again.

  Mike

  See this on the real issue:

  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/PuTTY/wishlist/Vista-update-breaks-config.html

  It turns out that the logon dialog box is invisible, but still, it agrees to enter you your password and LOG you!

• 6248 FI Cisco's UCS with Cisco catalyst 2960 connectivity

  In our environment, UCS, connects the two fabric as a Cisco Nexus 9 k switch upstream with vPC and it works well. But we need to isolate some virtual servers on the blades of the UCS on an entirely separate DMZ switch which is Cisco catalyst 2960.

  (1) so can we connect cables separate physical twinax of FI uplink ports to catalyst 2960 and connectivity to the servers in the DMZ keeping YEW to nexus connectivity as it is?

  (2) in this case, as there are 2 switches to nexus core 1 and 2 so we will require 2 cisco catalyst 2960 for disjoint such a network? or otherwise we can connect A FI and FI B to one on his 2 numbers 2960 switch. Gig SFP ports + 10?

  (3) also suggest things must be taken in charge, the best guides practice or an illustration in this context.

  The assignment is static and cannot be changed.

  location 1 - uplink 1

  slot 2 - uplink 2...

  If a property has no blade, the corresponding uplink is not used and that can not be changed!

  This dedication of uplinks of IOM is of course a lot of resources: cables, ports on FI, allowed port,...

• connection of switches cisco and hp with gbic

  I have a new Cisco 2960 x and an existing HP 2910al. I am OK with the set up, I have the hp interface and Cisco all the time with copper but this is the first that I had with fiber. I know that Cisco switch will a Cisco gbic (can move only with service not taken into charge-transmitter/receiver) and HP will want a Gbic hp (new Hp operating system only works with HP Gbic).

  So here's the question, Cisco Gbic and Hp Gbic of interconnection? I guess Yes, but want to ask before you buy and know that they don't.

  As long as they are of the same wavelength (like SR to LR to LR or SR) Yes they do.

• CISCO ASA 5515 WITH THE VERSION OF FIREPOWER

  ASA 5515 service with the power of fire. Can be managed with ASDM firepower. ?

  Anyone suggests Versions for firepower, ASDM, ASA?

  Kindly help

  You will find it useful to install the Module of firepower on ASA for the management of the premises:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/ASA/Quick_Start/SFR/firepo...

  Thank you

  Guillaume

  Rate if this can help!

• Cisco WLC 2504 with AIR-AP1131AG-A-K9

  Hello

  Can you help me for some info about AIR-AP1131AG-A-K9.

  I have a wlc 2504, but I don't know if the AIR-AP1131AG-A-K9-supported 2504 wlc.

  Can work this WLC 2504 with AIR-AP1131AG-A-K9 solution?

  If so, guide.

  Thank you very much

  Gezimv

  Check out this link. As long as you have software version 8.0.x 2504 version you can use 1131 AP with it. Nothing beyond software fate is more a series of support 1131.

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/wireless/compatibility/matrix/compatibility-matrix.html#56735

  HTH

  Rasika

  Pls note all useful responses *.

• Cisco SG300 SNMP with cacti

  I installed Cacti on ubuntu 14.04 and I'm trying to add a Cisco sg300.

  If the switch is configured like this:
  Server SNMP My Office location
  SNMP Server contact [email protected] / * /
  SNMP community - server MyC0mmun1ty ro 192.168.10.25 view by default

  I then in the settings of the device

  SwitchName Description
  The switch ip host name

  Cisco to host model router
  number of threads 1
  disable the unchecked host

  shot detection snmp device operating time
  ping timeout 400
  try again to pin 1

  SNMP version 2
  Community SNMP MyC0mmun1ty
  SNMP port 161
  SNMP timeout 500
  OIDs maximum 10

  from the cactus Server (192.168.10.25) if I have
  Nmap - sU Pei 161 switch ip of see:
  161/udp snmp open

  also on the sg300 I had to enable snmp in the security settings where ssh/telnet etc. is and have saved the config.

  But watch the cactus
  SNMP information
  SNMP error

  OK, I suggest you enable the SNMP agent on unrestricted IP switch, IE replace command:

   snmp-server community MyC0mmun1ty ro 192.168.10.25 view Default

  with the command:

   snmp-server community MyC0mmun1ty ro view Default

  and again snmpwalk. If it will work now, your SNMP to Cacti server applications are sourcing from another IP than 192.168.10.25 (your Cacti server configured several IP?).

• The services configuration of firepower on Cisco asa 5506 with ASDM

  I have a few 5506 firewalls, and they are fully licensed with services of power, control, Protection, URL filtering, malware. I have intend running and configuration of all of this on the 5506 by ASDM. I was wondering if there are guides for a basic configuration and the implementation of policies available. Something to show a basic configuration which would technically begin inspection of traffic and work. Then I can edit and make changes to my taste.

  Thank you

  My recommendation to clients is to look at the Cisco Live, BRKSEC-2018presentation. Please refer to the 56 slide from for a good overview of how policies are installed in a module of firepower.

  There are also a number of other detailed guides available in the FireSIGHT Management Center product support page should you care to learn more about customization and operations. You can also find the series of videos of ASA FirePOWER on request to Labminutes.com useful to guide you on execution of operations of your system.

• configuration Cisco No. 2851 IPS intrusion prevention system

  Hi, I wonder - could someone guide me to the implementation of IPS intrusion prevention system. I'm new to the world of cisco and still did not have my head around it. for the intrusion prevention system IPS I put 0/1 (lan) entrants and g 0/0 as a wan?

  Hello

  You must be careful when activating the IP address of your router. Category will activate you more cpu/memory will be used, and your router may crash.

  I'll write all the config as directly here, because it is a good step by step by Cisco:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/security/iOS-intrusion-...

  I'll also join a best practice document from Cisco.

  IPS/signature of software should be found on the Cisco's Web site: https://software.cisco.com/download/release.html?mdfid=282941564&reltype...

  To answer your question, you can do inbound and outbound on your WAN interface (attacks should come first to the outside).

  If you have enough power, why not do as well on the LAN but I will recommend doing it on the WAN, organize and when you're comfortable, you can create one for the LAN interface.

  Here is a config I made for a cisco 892 router which works fine:

  IP IP config flash card: ips try again 1
  IP IP address notify CETS
  IPS the ips name iosips IP list
  !
  category-signature IP ips
  all categories
  true retreat
  category ios_ips base
  fake retirement
  category all-ddos ddos
  fake retirement
  enabled true
  products-alert event-action connection tcp reset-deny-package-inline connection inline deny deny-attacker-inserted
  category, any adware/spyware-adware/spyware
  fake retirement
  enabled true
  products-alert event-action connection tcp reset-deny-package-inline connection inline deny deny-attacker-inserted
  category virus/worms/trojans botnet
  fake retirement
  enabled true
  products-alert event-action connection tcp reset-deny-package-inline connection inline deny deny-attacker-inserted
  category virus/worms/trojans all-viruses/worms/trojans
  fake retirement
  enabled true
  products-alert event-action connection tcp reset-deny-package-inline connection inline deny deny-attacker-inserted
  category models internet_edge
  Advanced ios_ips category
  fake retirement
  !

  ips-setting IP to auto update
  occur - 0 0 06 weekly
  Cisco
  username password xxxxxx xxxxx

  !

  !

  IPS extended IP access list
  allow a full tcp
  allow a udp
  allow icmp a whole
  allow an ip

  I don't know if you have a firewall on your local network, but when I do IPS on a cisco router if there is no firewall, I recommend you to activate ZBF on router itself. This allows to add a little more security.

  Just in case, under a ZBF configuration for home router (like the 892 series):

  extended access IP MANAGEMENT list
  permit tcp any any eq 22
  allow icmp a whole
  !
  Underisable extended IP access list
  deny ip host fragments 224.0.0.5

  
  deny ip host fragments 224.0.0.6
  refuse the host ip 224.0.0.5 no fragment
  refuse the host ip 224.0.0.6 no fragment
  permit icmp any any fragment
  allow udp any any fragment
  permit tcp any any fragment
  permit tcp any RST eq 639
  permit tcp any RST bgp eq
  IP enable any no fragment
  !
  zbf-wan-to-lan extended IP access list
  permit tcp any host 192.168.0.1 eq 3389 ===> internal of the server accessible from the internet (port forwarding)
  !
  type of class-card inspect entire game Internet
  group-access name zbf-wan-to-lan game
  class-map correspondence class-mgmt
  match the name of group-access MANAGEMENT
  unwanted match class-map
  match the name of group-access Underisable
  type of class-card inspect entire game All_Protocols
  tcp protocol match
  udp Protocol game
  match icmp Protocol
  !
  type of policy-card inspect Trusted_to_Internet
  class type inspect All_Protocols
  inspect
  class class by default
  drop
  type of policy-card inspect Trusted
  class class by default
  Pass
  copp-policy policy-map
  unwanted class
  drop
  class class-mgmt
  to comply with-police action 2048000 pass drop action exceeds
  class class by default
  type of policy-card inspect Internet_to_Trusted
  class type inspect Internet
  inspect
  class class by default
  drop
  !
  !
  Trusted zone security
  Security for the Internet zone
  Trusted zone-pair security-> trusted destination trust Trusted source
  traffic LAN to LAN Description
  type of service-strategy inspect Trusted
  Trusted zone-pair security-> Trusted Internet source Internet destination
  Description LAN for Internet traffic
  type of service-strategy inspect Trusted_to_Internet
  security Internet zone - pair-> Trusted Internet source Trusted destination
  Description WAN for Internet traffic
  type of service-strategy inspect Internet_to_Trusted
  !
  the g0/0 interface (WAN)
  the Member's area Internet Security
  !
  G0/1 of the interface (LAN)
  approved members area security
  !

  Thank you

• Failover on Cisco ASA 5505 with EasyVPN

  Hello

  I've implemented a customer EasyVPN with a Cisco ASA 5505 and I am trying to configure the failover but I get this message:

  "Failover cannot be configured as Cisco Easy VPN remote is activated."

  However, I have seen in the link below, this dynamic rollover is compatible with the easy standard (and not with improved but I don't think I use easyVPN improved).

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/security/iOS-easy-VPN/e...

  The configuration I did through ASDM is very simple:

  vpnclient server * * *.
  vpnclient-mode client mode
  vpngroup vpnclient * password *.
  vpnclient username * password *.
  vpnclient enable

  My question is how can I implement failover with a client on a Cisco ASA 5505 EasyVPN?

  Thanks in advance

  You cannot configure the failover of a device that acts as a client

• EzVPN between Cisco ASA 5505 (with NEM mode) and Ciscoo 881 Roure

  Hi friends,

  I configured the Cisco ASA 5505 and Cisco router with DMVPN 881. 3 offices works very well but one office remains failure. I did the same configuration for all facilities but this router does not work. Any ideas?

  Please find below the exit of 881 router Cisco:

  YF2_Tbilisi_router #.
  * 4 August 09:31:26.793: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 AG_INIT_EXCH...
  * 09:31:26.793 4 August: ISAKMP (0): increment the count of errors on his, try 4 out 5: retransmit the phase 1
  * 4 August 09:31:26.793: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 AG_INIT_EXCH
  * 4 August 09:31:26.793: ISAKMP: (0): 1.1.1.1 package sending 500 peer_port 500 (I) my_port AG_INIT_EXCH
  * 09:31:26.793 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
  * 4 August 09:31:36.793: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 AG_INIT_EXCH...
  * 09:31:36.793 4 August: ISAKMP (0): increment the count of errors on his, try 5 of 5: retransmit the phase 1
  * 4 August 09:31:36.793: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 AG_INIT_EXCH
  * 4 August 09:31:36.793: ISAKMP: (0): 1.1.1.1 package sending 500 peer_port 500 (I) my_port AG_INIT_EXCH
  * 09:31:36.793 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
  * 09:31:44.929 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): serving SA., its is 88961 B 34, delme is 88961 B 34
  * 4 August 09:31:46.793: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 AG_INIT_EXCH...
  * 09:31:46.793 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): the peer is not paranoid KeepAlive.

  * 09:31:46.793 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): removal of reason ITS status of 'Death by retransmission P1' (I) AG_INIT_EXCH (peer 1.1.1.1)
  * 09:31:46.793 4 August: % CRYPTO-6-EZVPN_CONNECTION_DOWN: user (customer) = group = Youth_Facility_2 Server_public_addr = 1.1.1.1
  * 4 August 09:31:46.793: ISAKMP:isadb_key_addr_delete: no key for address 1.1.1.1 (root NULL)
  * 09:31:46.793 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): removal of reason ITS status of 'Death by retransmission P1' (I) AG_INIT_EXCH (peer 1.1.1.1)
  * 09:31:46.793 4 August: ISAKMP: Unlocking counterpart struct 0x8AA90C50 for isadb_mark_sa_deleted(), count 0
  * 09:31:46.793 4 August: ISAKMP: delete peer node by peer_reap for 1.1.1.1: 8AA90C50
  * 09:31:46.793 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PHASE1_DEL
  * 09:31:46.793 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_I_AM1 = IKE_DEST_SA

  * 4 August 09:31:47.805: del_node 2.2.2.2 src dst 1.1.1.1:500 fvrf 0 x 0, ivrf 0 x 0
  * 09:31:47.805 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): the peer is not paranoid KeepAlive.

  * 4 August 09:31:47.805: ISAKMP: (0): profile of THE request is (NULL)
  * 09:31:47.805 4 August: ISAKMP: created a struct peer 1.1.1.1, peer port 500
  * 09:31:47.805 4 August: ISAKMP: new created position = 0x8AA90C50 peer_handle = 0 x 80004819
  * 09:31:47.805 4 August: ISAKMP: lock struct 0x8AA90C50, refcount 1 to peer isakmp_initiator
  * 09:31:47.805 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): client configuration parameters 87531228 adjustment
  * 09:31:47.805 4 August: ISAKMP: 500 local port, remote port 500
  * 09:31:47.805 4 August: ISAKMP: find a dup her to the tree during his B 88961, 34 = isadb_insert call BVA
  * 4 August 09:31:47.805: ISAKMP: (0): set up client mode.
  * 4 August 09:31:47.805: ISAKMP: (0): built of NAT - T of the seller-rfc3947 ID
  * 4 August 09:31:47.805: ISAKMP: (0): built the seller-07 ID NAT - t
  * 4 August 09:31:47.805: ISAKMP: (0): built of NAT - T of the seller-03 ID
  * 4 August 09:31:47.805: ISAKMP: (0): built the seller-02 ID NAT - t
  * 4 August 09:31:47.805: ISKAMP: more send buffer from 1024 to 3072
  * 09:31:47.805 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): ITS been pre-shared key and XAUTH authentication using id ID_KEY_ID type
  * 09:31:47.805 4 August: ISAKMP (0): payload ID
  next payload: 13
  type: 11
  Group ID: Youth_Facility_2
  Protocol: 17
  Port: 0
  Length: 24
  * 09:31:47.805 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): the total payload length: 24
  * 09:31:47.809 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_IPSEC, IKE_SA_REQ_AM
  * 09:31:47.809 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_READY = IKE_I_AM1

  * 4 August 09:31:47.809: ISAKMP: (0): Beginner aggressive Mode Exchange
  * 4 August 09:31:47.809: ISAKMP: (0): 1.1.1.1 package sending 500 peer_port 500 (I) my_port AG_INIT_EXCH
  * 09:31:47.809 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
  * 4 August 09:31:57.809: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 AG_INIT_EXCH...
  * 09:31:57.809 4 August: ISAKMP (0): increment the count of errors on his, try 1 5: retransmit the phase 1
  * 4 August 09:31:57.809: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 AG_INIT_EXCH
  * 4 August 09:31:57.809: ISAKMP: (0): 1.1.1.1 package sending 500 peer_port 500 (I) my_port AG_INIT_EXCH
  * 09:31:57.809 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
  * 4 August 09:32:07.809: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 AG_INIT_EXCH...
  * 09:32:07.809 4 August: ISAKMP (0): increment the count of errors on his, try 2 of 5: retransmit the phase 1
  * 4 August 09:32:07.809: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 AG_INIT_EXCH
  * 4 August 09:32:07.809: ISAKMP: (0): 1.1.1.1 package sending 500 peer_port 500 (I) my_port AG_INIT_EXCH
  * 09:32:07.809 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
  * 4 August 09:32:17.809: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 AG_INIT_EXCH...
  * 09:32:17.809 4 August: ISAKMP (0): increment the count of errors on his, try 3 of 5: retransmit the phase 1
  * 4 August 09:32:17.809: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 AG_INIT_EXCH
  * 4 August 09:32:17.809: ISAKMP: (0): 1.1.1.1 package sending 500 peer_port 500 (I) my_port AG_INIT_EXCH
  * 09:32:17.809 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
  * 4 August 09:32:27.809: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 AG_INIT_EXCH...
  * 09:32:27.809 4 August: ISAKMP (0): increment the count of errors on his, try 4 out 5: retransmit the phase 1
  * 4 August 09:32:27.809: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 AG_INIT_EXCH
  * 4 August 09:32:27.809: ISAKMP: (0): 1.1.1.1 package sending 500 peer_port 500 (I) my_port AG_INIT_EXCH
  * 09:32:27.809 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
  * 4 August 09:32:37.809: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 AG_INIT_EXCH...
  * 09:32:37.809 4 August: ISAKMP (0): increment the count of errors on his, try 5 of 5: retransmit the phase 1
  * 4 August 09:32:37.809: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 AG_INIT_EXCH
  * 4 August 09:32:37.809: ISAKMP: (0): 1.1.1.1 package sending 500 peer_port 500 (I) my_port AG_INIT_EXCH
  * 09:32:37.809 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
  * 09:32:46.793 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): serving SA., his is 872E1504, delme is 872E1504
  * 4 August 09:32:47.809: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 AG_INIT_EXCH...
  * 09:32:47.809 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): the peer is not paranoid KeepAlive.

  * 09:32:47.809 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): removal of reason ITS status of 'Death by retransmission P1' (I) AG_INIT_EXCH (peer 1.1.1.1)
  * 09:32:47.809 4 August: % CRYPTO-6-EZVPN_CONNECTION_DOWN: user (customer) = group = Youth_Facility_2 Server_public_addr = 1.1.1.1
  * 4 August 09:32:47.809: ISAKMP:isadb_key_addr_delete: no key for address 1.1.1.1 (root NULL)
  * 09:32:47.809 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): removal of reason ITS status of 'Death by retransmission P1' (I) AG_INIT_EXCH (peer 1.1.1.1)
  * 09:32:47.809 4 August: ISAKMP: Unlocking counterpart struct 0x8AA90C50 for isadb_mark_sa_deleted(), count 0
  * 09:32:47.809 4 August: ISAKMP: delete peer node by peer_reap for 1.1.1.1: 8AA90C50
  * 09:32:47.809 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PHASE1_DEL
  * 09:32:47.809 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_I_AM1 = IKE_DEST_SA

  * 4 August 09:32:48.909: del_node src 2.2.2.2:500 dst 1.1.1.1:500 fvrf 0 x 0, ivrf 0 x 0
  * 09:32:48.909 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): the peer is not paranoid KeepAlive.

  * 4 August 09:32:48.909: ISAKMP: (0): profile of THE request is (NULL)
  * 09:32:48.909 4 August: ISAKMP: created a struct peer 1.1.1.1, peer port 500
  * 09:32:48.909 4 August: ISAKMP: new created position = 0x8AA90C50 peer_handle = 0 x 80004818
  * 09:32:48.909 4 August: ISAKMP: lock struct 0x8AA90C50, refcount 1 to peer isakmp_initiator
  * 09:32:48.909 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): client setting Configuration parameters 88C05A48
  * 09:32:48.909 4 August: ISAKMP: 500 local port, remote port 500
  * 09:32:48.909 4 August: ISAKMP: find a dup her to the tree during the isadb_insert his 87B57D38 = call BVA
  * 4 August 09:32:48.909: ISAKMP: (0): set up client mode.
  * 4 August 09:32:48.909: ISAKMP: (0): built of NAT - T of the seller-rfc3947 ID
  * 4 August 09:32:48.909: ISAKMP: (0): built the seller-07 ID NAT - t
  * 4 August 09:32:48.909: ISAKMP: (0): built of NAT - T of the seller-03 ID
  * 4 August 09:32:48.909: ISAKMP: (0): built the seller-02 ID NAT - t
  * 4 August 09:32:48.909: ISKAMP: more send buffer from 1024 to 3072
  * 09:32:48.913 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): ITS been pre-shared key and XAUTH authentication using id ID_KEY_ID type
  * 09:32:48.913 4 August: ISAKMP (0): payload ID
  next payload: 13
  type: 11
  Group ID: Youth_Facility_2
  Protocol: 17
  Port: 0
  Length: 24
  * 09:32:48.913 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): the total payload length: 24
  * 09:32:48.913 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_IPSEC, IKE_SA_REQ_AM
  * 09:32:48.913 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_READY = IKE_I_AM1

  * 4 August 09:32:48.913: ISAKMP: (0): Beginner aggressive Mode Exchange
  * 4 August 09:32:48.913: ISAKMP: (0): 1.1.1.1 package sending 500 peer_port 500 (I) my_port AG_INIT_EXCH
  * 09:32:48.913 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
  * 4 August 09:32:58.913: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 AG_INIT_EXCH...
  * 09:32:58.913 4 August: ISAKMP (0): increment the count of errors on his, try 1 5: retransmit the phase 1
  * 4 August 09:32:58.913: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 AG_INIT_EXCH
  * 4 August 09:32:58.913: ISAKMP: (0): 1.1.1.1 package sending 500 peer_port 500 (I) my_port AG_INIT_EXCH
  * 09:32:58.913 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
  * 4 August 09:33:08.913: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 AG_INIT_EXCH...
  * 09:33:08.913 4 August: ISAKMP (0): increment the count of errors on his, try 2 of 5: retransmit the phase 1
  * 4 August 09:33:08.913: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 AG_INIT_EXCH
  * 4 August 09:33:08.913: ISAKMP: (0): 1.1.1.1 package sending 500 peer_port 500 (I) my_port AG_INIT_EXCH
  * 09:33:08.913 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
  * 4 August 09:33:18.913: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 AG_INIT_EXCH...
  * 09:33:18.913 4 August: ISAKMP (0): increment the count of errors on his, try 3 of 5: retransmit the phase 1
  * 4 August 09:33:18.913: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 AG_INIT_EXCH
  * 4 August 09:33:18.913: ISAKMP: (0): 1.1.1.1 package sending 500 peer_port 500 (I) my_port AG_INIT_EXCH
  * 09:33:18.913 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
  * 4 August 09:33:28.913: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 AG_INIT_EXCH...
  * 09:33:28.913 4 August: ISAKMP (0): increment the count of errors on his, try 4 out 5: retransmit the phase 1
  * 4 August 09:33:28.913: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 AG_INIT_EXCH
  * 4 August 09:33:28.913: ISAKMP: (0): 1.1.1.1 package sending 500 peer_port 500 (I) my_port AG_INIT_EXCH
  * 09:33:28.913 4 August: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.

  There is no DMVPN on the SAA. All that you have configured, is not compatible with the ASA or something another DMVPN then. At least debugging shows that there are some EzVPN involved.

  The debug version, it seems that there is no communication on UDP/500 possible between devices. Maybe something is blocking who?

• Cisco 1252 s with regular 802.3af PoE switch - what are the impacts?

  Does anyone have an experience of real life to the deployment of the 1252 s on 802.3af regular PoE switches?  I have a few 1252 s a certain ports PoE 3560 and issuing upward with alarms 'low power '.

  I wonder what the impact of the real world with this scenario.  The 1252 s have both 2.4 Ghz and a radio-5, 0 Ghz in them and I have HT enabled on the controller.

  I wonder what capabilities I lose by running on 802.3af food in addition to the inconvenience of the alarms.

  Thanks in advance!

  Hello

  This is the command question... the AP 1252 switches POE needs improved Ex-3750-E for all operational radios... If we use only a 802.3af while a single frequency can be enabed and her we can't get a rhythm N... the link below will explain better...

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/wireless/ps5678/ps6973/ps8382/product_data_sheet0900aecd806b7c5c.html

  I would like to know how it works for you!

  Concerning

  Surendra

• Cisco TelePresence SX20 with laptop

  I use a Cisco TelePresence as autonomous SX20 endpoint configured with a public IP address (in Pakistan). I want to connect a portable computer (to Canada) to start video conferencing using the portable camera. Please advice me the software to install on the laptop so that I can start with my SX20 videoconferencing based on IP configured on my SX20.

  To understand kindly refer to the disposal of partner network.

  Please help me its urgent.

  Hello

  www.ciscojabbervideo.com

  BR Oleksandr