Clarification of the procedure on 11g DBA OCP 10g OCP 1z0-052/3 via

Similar Questions

• Req: Clarification of certain scenarios wrt retirement DBA OCP 9i wrt training:

  I can see the the retired OCP DBA 9i will probably come to a shock to some people one started and not completed this certification.
  (https://blogs.oracle.com/certification/entry/0864_01)
  
  While most have removed at the door; others may have had a reason including for reasons of family, work or illness that have stalled their progress. I am also of the belief in a substantial amount of cheating probably occurred on this track, although there are probably some real DBA practitioners who may be trapped.
  
  The OCP DBA 9i is obviously obsolete; the only practical value is really for people to be able to upgrade to 11 g/12 c OCP DBA via 1z0-055(+1z0-060) without additional authorized training, which may be a cost for some reason if the employer will not pay for their training.
  
  The situation of the person who has failed an exam 1z0-007(or alt)/1z0-031/032/033 by date (July 31, 2013) retirement is completely clear. They will not receive any OCP DBA 9i. Never.
  
  
  However I can think of two situations that may be less clear where the training was not registered before July 31, 2013: (and also a situation of merger id).
  
  
  Case 1:
  ~~~~~
  
  Myfanwy has completed a training course of 9i WDP authorized in July 2009.
  She spent her exams 1z0-007/031/032/033 for the remainder of 2009; and duly received her DBA OCA 9i certification.
  ... She however has not presented his training for verification and therefore is not and has not received an OCP DBA 9i.
  
  Let's say 30 September 2013 (after retirement from July 31, 2013) she finally gets round to submit (or trying to) its training for verification
  ...... It will be accepted and she be assigned a DBA OCP 9i or she left it too late? (the key point that during his training, was
  retirement planning its audit of training (which is considered a pseudo review) was submitted post retirement).
  
  
  Case 2:
  ~~~~~
  
  Rhys self studied and passed his exams 1z0-007/031/032/033 in 2010; and duly received her DBA OCA 9i certification.
  Rhys found a job as a DBA to Portmeirion, but has been unable to escape to complete the approved training.
  As Rhys has never had any training permitted, it was not and did not receive an OCP DBA 9i.
  
  In August 2013 Rhys has finally managed to attend a 12 c Database what's new in the course as OU (the general principle is a suitable 10g / 11g OCP DBA internship can be used instead a 9i course so is reasonable such a course of 12 c would be acceptable.) (Usually OK if training version > = version of the certification and no significant changes in the database product (for example, the OAS to WLS)).
  
  On September 13, 2013 Rhys claims (or trys to submit) training (which was taken after July 31, 2013) for verification...
  ...... It will be accepted and it will be awarded an OCP DBA 9i or that he has left it too late?
  
  
  Case 3: (merger of id):
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~
  
  Dilbert has completed a training course of 9i WDP authorized in July 2009.
  He passed his exams 1z0-007/031 in the rest of 2009 under Oracle test ID OC123456 and received 9i DBA OCA;
  and also submitted its 9i WDP internship approved wrt OCP DBA 9i.
  In 2010 he spent 1z0-032 and 1z0-033 exam under Oracle test ID WC987645
  Because exams have been taken under different Id test Oracle he was not and did not receive an OCP DBA 9i.
  
  Let's say that on 30 September 2013 (after July 31, 2013) Dilbert realizes that reviews have been conducted at different Id
  A DBA OCP 9i will receive after the merger, even if this certification is no longer available?
  
  
  
  ############
  
  My suspicion is that oracle will not be of certifications for cases (1) and (2); but probably for (3). So it may be mandatory candidates get their training record and check on certview that their reviews and approved training are saved as they expected, and that Oracle take measures to encourage the candidates to do so.
  
  Please also note that the more general case of suggestions about what to do if you have partially completed onl this certification track are discussed on {: identifier of the thread = 2512700}
  
  Published by: bigdelboy on March 19, 2013 14:34 obviously anyone affected please response of wheel, Brandye below, which may be good news to someone somewhere!

  In fact, certification would be granted to all candidates. The exams retire and technically the certification paths are retiring, but and the stages of certification do not retire. That sounds a bit confusing, but if last step a candidate for certification 9i is a step that his retirement (as a training course, or the form of course), then delivers us a certification if they perform this step. If all your scenarios will lead to certification yet.

  Kind regards
  Brandye Barrington
  Certification Forum Moderator

• OCÉ: 1z1 - 054: passage beta without being 11g DBA OCP review?

  Hello
  
  I have question: can I take beta exam 1z1-054 (OCÉ performance for 11g tunning) without being certified 11g OCP DBA? After sucessful from 1z1 - 054 I'd go for 11g OCP DBA certification, then submit hands course... is it possbile? I am aware that I would not be allowed to claim that I spent this OCE certification until I won 11g OCP DBA.
  
  Thanks for the reply.

  You don't have to a g 11 DBA OCP before sitting for the exam in beta 1Z1-054. In fact, you don't have to be a DBA OCP 11 g to get this certification. You can also get certification by completing the required training. You can see your two options on our Web site at http://education-dev.oracle.com/pls/web_prod-plq-dad/db_pages.getpage?page_id=287.

  Kind regards
  Brandye Barrington
  Certification Forum Moderator
  Manager certification program

• Question about the installation of 11g R2 and 10g R2

  Hi, my system is Windows 7, 32-bit with Service Pack 1.
  
  Can I install Oracle 10 g R2? Or Oracle 11g R2?
  
  Could someone send me the download links?
  
  Thank you very much.
  
  Happy Thanksgiving!

  Salvation;

  Several user forum already answered your question,

  Can I install Oracle 10 g R2? Or Oracle 11g R2?

  Both version can be installed on win 7. 10g to 10.2.0.5 version. For this version and also 10.2.0.1 reference, you must connect metalink and must raise SR or contact the local oracle office. Because as mentioned here only 11.2 download available

  If your Windows 7 is version home you can create vmmachine on your win7 OS that download oracle linux(OEL 5.x) of delivery site that install this on your vmmachine and can use it for your db instalation problem

  Could someone send me the download links?

  As mention before only 11g download available on OTN:
  http://www.Oracle.com/technetwork/database/Enterprise-Edition/downloads/index.html

  PS: Please don't forget to change the status thread answer whether it is possible when believe you your thread replied, he pretend to wasting time in other forums users while they are looking outstanding which is not answered, thank you for understanding

  Respect of
  HELIOS

• Request for clarification on the new Solaris Cert review requirements.

  Regarding:
  

  Important changes to Java and Oracle Solaris Certifications
  Architect Java, Java developer, system administrator Solaris and Solaris Security Administrator path of certification requirements, starting August 1, 2011, will include a new requirement of compulsory attendance of courses.
  Candidates can obtain their certifications with the current requirements of the track available on the website of Oracle Certification through July 31, 2011...

  References:
  
  (1) http://education.oracle.com/pls/web_prod-plq-dad/db_pages.getpage?page_id=449
  
  (2) ASFS/OSSA 10 OCP Oracle Certified Professional, Oracle Solaris 10 System Administrator: http://education.oracle.com/pls/web_prod-plq-dad/db_pages.getpage?page_id=328
  
  (3) SCSEA/OSSESA 10 OCÉ Oracle Certified Expert, Oracle Solaris 10 security administrator: http://education.oracle.com/pls/web_prod-plq-dad/db_pages.getpage?page_id=330
  
  
  Reference (1) seems to indicate candidates wishing to obtain the OSSA and OSSESA would need to attend two classes, one for each.
  - Or is that what someone already ASFS/OSSA would not attend an additional for OSSESA class (as is the case for 10 DBA OCP/PAP 10 OCÉ).
  -If two classes are needed and a candidate has participated in the Solaris 10 OS part 2 System Administration which is a pre - req common for both exams, would be that monoclass is sufficient for two exams.
  ..........
  
  From my point of view and I suspect many others are in my situation, having a 10 existing ASFS.
  .... Does this mean that post July 31, 2001 it was desirable to acquire the 10 OSSESA a ECAS course so to must attend after that date?
  .... Looking forward to Solaris 11; This average current holder of OSSA/ASFS 10 existing will be should he follow a course for the upgrade to what I guess is Solaris 11 certifications at any given time.
  
  Thank you - bigdelboy
  
  Published by: bigdelboy on February 25, 2011 10:10

  Thanks for the questions. I could get more details on this.

  Reference (1) seems to indicate candidates wishing to obtain the OSSA and OSSESA would need to attend two classes, one for each.
  - Or is that what someone already ASFS/OSSA would not attend an additional for OSSESA class (as is the case for 10 DBA OCP/PAP 10 OCÉ).
  -If two classes are needed and a candidate has been involved in System Administration Solaris 10 OS part 2 which is a common pre - req for the two reviews, would be that monoclass is sufficient for two exams.

  If a candidate holds certification of sysadmin (Sun or Oracle brand), they can get safety Admin certification taking the exam, without additional training. So, 2 possible paths to safety certification Admin will be:
  -Oracle Certified Professional, system administrator Oracle Solaris 10 + Oracle Solaris 10 security administrator Certified Expert examination = Oracle Certified Expert, Oracle Solaris 10 security administrator
  -Training course + Oracle Solaris 10 security administrator Certified Expert examination = Oracle Certified Expert, Oracle Solaris 10 security administrator

  From my point of view and I suspect many others are in my situation, having a 10 existing ASFS.
  +.... Does that mean that post July 31, 2001, it was desirable to acquire the ECO 10 OSSESA one course then to must attend after that date? +
  +.... Looking forward to Solaris 11; This average current holder of OSSA/ASFS 10 existing will be should he follow a course for the upgrade to what I guess is Solaris 11 certifications at one point. +

  If a candidate holds certification of sysadmin (Sun or Oracle brand), they can get safety Admin certification taking the exam, without additional training. This means that if you got your certification Sys Amin before the obligation of running training, your certification will fill always the prerequisite.

  What about the next version of certification: in general, Oracle no training required for upgrades, so if you have the Solaris 10 version of certification (if you completed or not training), you will be allowed to upgrade to the new version with no training requirment. However, training is strongly recommended to help better prepare to review and also to better prepare for their role.

  Kind regards
  Brandye Barrington
  Certification Forum Moderator

• Past 10g OCA/OCP test - no. $ class - OK to take the test of 11g upgrade?

  I passed the tests OCA and OCP 10g. We have no training $$s so I can't take the a required class to get the official status of OCP.
  
  It will be a problem if I also take review of upgrade of OCP 11 g? I'm hoping to pass the exam of the 11g in the coming months. I hope that we have $$s and I can attend an approved course next year and then complete the appropriate forms to get the status of official OCP 10 g and 11 g OCP. This sequence of events would cause problems?
  
  Edit: I'm talking about the reviews for 'administrator '. Thank you.
  
  Published by: user10251150 on 7 Sep 2010 15:13

  user10251150 wrote:
  I passed the tests OCA and OCP 10g. We have no training $$s so I can't take the a required class to get the official status of OCP.

  It will be a problem if I also take review of upgrade of OCP 11 g? I'm hoping to pass the exam of the 11g in the coming months. I hope that we have $$s and I can attend an approved course next year and then complete the appropriate forms to get the status of official OCP 10 g and 11 g OCP. This sequence of events would cause problems?

  No problems.

  Only possible disadvantages could reduce the availability of some of the shorter and cheaper g 10 course that would suit the requirement. Sometimes 11g courses may be accepted for a 10 g OCP DBA, but check first.

  (It doesn't affect you, but to confirm it for other readers, the reverse is not true, 10 g training is not accepted for 11g certification OCP DBA... those with a drive of 10g will go 1z0-042/3 and then 1z0-050 (as you do)).

• Guarantee that won't change the examination required for DBA OCA 11g

  I'm about to take the exam 1Z0-051 - SQL Fundamentals in my path to the OCA 11 g certification. then I plan the training for 1Z0 - 052 - DB Admin I next Jan 2011 and will write the review more than dec 2011 if I can put the knowledge I have acquired training in real work situations for a year before the exam 1Z0-052. The problem is, is it possible (even remotely) which will change the examination required for 11g OCA in this period of one year? Say, as you have to pass 1Z0-047 rather 1Z0 - 051 for 11g OCA, thus renderring my pass 1Z0-051 worthless? because I don't think it's possible that I will get a refund. Oracle can guarantee, or Oracle can change requirements when they want as they are happy?
  The reason why I take 1Z0-051 is first because I'm already pretty confident with my SQL skills, but not so much with my DB Admin skills since I just started to use Oracle DB. I used SQL Server for the last 3 years. Thank you

  I can't guarantee anything unequivically, but we have radically would not change the certification requirements without providing options for candidates who are already on the path to certification. I can't predict this review being removed from this way, that this review has been developed for the path of the OCA 11 g. The other reviews that are alternatives to this review have been approved as an alternative, they were not developed specifically for the OCA 11 g review. I don't think you have to worry about this.

  Kind regards
  Brandye Barrington

• If one already has 12 DBA OCP, so we cannot take OCA 12 DBA right? wouldn't this OCJA again go back

  If we are already 12 DBA OCP, then I heard that we are not allowed to take the OCA 12 DBA.

  Also this new certification OCJA looks like a designer certification, but this is a junior DBA certification.

  It seems that we would go back.

  Roger

  If we are already 12 DBA OCP, then I heard that we are not allowed to take the OCA 12 DBA.

  Ok.  If you were an 11g OCP (specifically an Oracle Database 11g Administrator Certified Professional) and had to take the exam 1Z0-060, then you would * also * hold the credential of administrator Certified Professional 12 c Oracle database.  You would not, however, the credentials of the Administrator Certified Associate of 12 c in Oracle database.  If you wish, you can take the exam 1Z0-062 and at that time you would hold all the three powers OCP 11g, 12g OCP and 12 c OCA.  The Oracle certification program does not prevent you to do this.  In fact, I hold all three certifications... but only because I took 1Z0-062 while it was in beta before I took the exam 1Z0-060.  I don't really see a point to come back and win the OCA 12 c, but you can if you wish.

  Also this new certification OCJA looks like a designer certification, but this is a junior DBA certification.

  OCJA certification is not part of the way s/n, so it's not really back going in this direction.  I agree that it is a certification that would normally be the target of the people who had not yet obtained their 12 c OCA, OCP.  I do not think that earn this certification in addition to the OCP 12 you would appear to be younger than you would without it.  That said, if you don't think the themes during the test are those that it would be worth your time to study - you already know or because they are the ones that you do not have and will not - use then further consideration is unnecessary.  I agree that it is a developer certification, and in fact, I have recommended a couple of days at Brandye they be moved to the section "database application development" the test of all the ads rather than the 'Oracle Database 12 c' section.

  I already started to focus on the examination in the creation of a study guide for it. In part I find interesting review because my assistant developer really needs to understand these issues better than it does currently.  I doubt that it is an isolated case. I also use in a real problem to find good sources of materials for a person to learn the information covered in this review. No manual Oracle do cover all of the content of the examination (Concepts covers a bit and the Guide SQL a bit).  I can't find good books on Amazon for people to point.

  In my opinion, it's a problem serious because a developer understand how to perform the tasks assigned to this review should be second nature. Because I can't find resources, I guess now they learn by practice or by mouth-to-a developer highest... who has probably learned by practice.  I remember some of the courses at the College, but that shouldn't be the only developers that newly hatched place can learn these skills.

• insufficient privileges when you create sequence using the procedure

  CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE schema1.proc1 AS
  BEGIN
  EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'DROP SEQUENCE schema1.add_ins_seq';
  EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'CREATE SEQUENCE schema1.add_ins_seq MINVALUE 1 MAXVALUE 999999999999999999999999999 INCREMENT BY 1 START WITH 1 CACHE 1000 NOORDER  NOCYCLE';
  END;
  

  This procedure is created to schema1 by schema1.

  Schema1 boasts a CREATE SEQUENCE privilege.

  When I run this procedure through SQL Developer after the Cup to schema1, the error is thrown in insufficient privilege to CREATE SEQUENCE, however, DROP SEQUENCE is executed. I can create the sequence without the procedure call.

  If I add AUTHID CURRENT_USER so I don't get the error of insufficient privileges.

  Why it gives this error when the owner and the applicant of the procedure is schema1?

  Hello

  1st thing to know: when a procedure is defined (and updated), any privileges granted through ROLE is not taken into account. This is because these privileges can be active or not at the level of the session (as happens if for example a user has active 'role A' in session 1 but not in session 2 and if this role has been used to define a procedure?) The proecedure must at the same time be VALID in session 1 and INVALID session 2? Is not possible.

  Thus, for instance in a situation of 'standard': user SYSTEM has 'DBA Rôle', so you can for example make a sqlplus session "SELECT * v $ instance;", but you would write a procedure owned by system making instance_name SELECT INTO l_variable OF v$ instance;  "then"surprise": the procedure cannot be compiled because of the ORA-904 Table or view does not exist..." To be able to create the procedure, a DSS system needs to be done.

  2nd thing for your special case, a little more complex: default for a procedure is 'AUTHID DEFINE', but once more: it means "privileges of the author creating the procedure", so without taking into account the acquired privileges through roles... Your user name is 'sequence create' through a role, it cannot use the privilege within the procedure.  But... but when you define the procedure with AUTHID CURRENT_USER, privileges are evaluated at run time, and thanks to the active ROLE in the session by calling the procedure, at this time, the user can create the sequence.  If try again you but with 'The VALUE NONE ROLE' in the session before the call, you will again have the question.

  Conclusion: If you need to do the action, you must grant the user the necessary privilege directly.

  Best regards

  Bruno Vroman.

• The procedure with parameter output from test object type

  I have the sub object created with spec and body type.

  I need to test the procedure seen ino parameter object type.

  could you please help me test the procedure!

  create or replace type typ_obj_test as object
  (
     a_date   date,
     a_type   varchar2(10),
     a_status varchar2(2),
     descr    varchar2(10),
     a_id     number(10),
     constructor function typ_obj_test(a_date   date
                                      ,a_type   varchar2 default null
                                      ,a_status varchar2 default null
                                      ,descr    varchar2 default null
                                      ,a_id     number default null) return self as result
  );
  /
  create or replace type body typ_obj_test is
     constructor function typ_obj_test(a_date   date
                                      ,a_type   varchar2 default null
                                      ,a_status varchar2 default null
                                      ,descr    varchar2 default null
                                      ,a_id     number default null) return self as result is
        v_test varchar2(1);
        v_id   number(10);
     begin
        self.a_date   := a_date;
        self.a_type   := a_type;
        self.a_status := a_status;
        self.descr    := descr;
        self.a_id     := a_id;
        return;
     end;
  end;
  /
  create or replace procedure p_obj_test(p_obj_param in out typ_obj_test) is
  begin
     dbms_output.put_line('Checking the object type' || p_obj_param.a_date || '@' || p_obj_param.a_type || '@' || p_obj_param.a_status || '@' ||
                          p_obj_param.descr || '@' || p_obj_param.a_id);
  end;
  /
  

  You seem to be missing a table that could hold the object. See the next topic, especially the line # 43:

  Connected to:
  Oracle Database 11g Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
  
  SQL> create or replace type typ_obj_test as object
    2  (
    3    a_date  date,
    4    a_type  varchar2(10),
    5    a_status varchar2(2),
    6    descr    varchar2(10),
    7    a_id    number(10),
    8    constructor function typ_obj_test(a_date  date
    9                                      ,a_type  varchar2 default null
  10                                      ,a_status varchar2 default null
  11                                      ,descr    varchar2 default null
  12                                      ,a_id    number default null) return self as result
  13  );
  14  /
  
  Type created.
  
  SQL> create or replace type body typ_obj_test is
    2    constructor function typ_obj_test(a_date  date
    3                                      ,a_type  varchar2 default null
    4                                      ,a_status varchar2 default null
    5                                      ,descr    varchar2 default null
    6                                      ,a_id    number default null) return self as result is
    7        v_test varchar2(1);
    8        v_id  number(10);
    9    begin
  10        self.a_date  := a_date;
  11        self.a_type  := a_type;
  12        self.a_status := a_status;
  13        self.descr    := descr;
  14        self.a_id    := a_id;
  15        return;
  16    end;
  17  end;
  18  /
  
  Type body created.
  
  -- Create a Nested table type array of above object type
  SQL> create or replace type nt_typ_obj_test as table of typ_obj_test;
    2  /
  
  Type created.
  
  -- Keep in out parameter's type as the nested table type
  -- modified the proc to do loop so that multiple records can be passed via object type
  SQL> create or replace procedure p_obj_test(p_obj_param in out nt_typ_obj_test) is
    2  begin
    3  for i in p_obj_param.first..p_obj_param.last
    4  loop
    5    dbms_output.put_line('Checking the object type' || p_obj_param(i).a_date || '@' || p_obj_param(i).a_type || '@' || p_obj_param(i).a_status || '@' ||
    6                          p_obj_param(i).descr || '@' || p_obj_param(i).a_id);
    7  end loop;
    8  end;
    9  /
  
  Procedure created.
  
  --Call the procedure
  SQL> set serveroutput on
  SQL> declare
    2  i_nt_typ nt_typ_obj_test ;
    3  begin
    4  i_nt_typ:=nt_typ_obj_test(typ_obj_test(sysdate,'A','Y','Descr',23),typ_obj_test(sysdate,'X','Z','ewe',55));
    5  p_obj_test(i_nt_typ);
    6  end;
    7  /
  Checking the object type26-MAR-15@A@Y@Descr@23
  Checking the object type26-MAR-15@X@Z@ewe@55
  
  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
  
  SQL>
  

• formulated differently: 10G OCP can upgrade to 11G OCP (1z0-050 or 1z0-034) and be always active, correct?

  The sentence differently: 10G OCP can upgrade to 11G OCP (1z0-050 or 1z0-034) and be always active, correct?

  They should NOT put just to 12 c, correct.

  Someone at work took the Oracle class in Chicago: Oracle 11 g new Featurers for administrators.

  They wanted to ensure that they would NOT have to take another training class Oracle.

  Thank you Roger

  The sentence differently: 10G OCP can upgrade to 11G OCP (1z0-050 or 1z0-034) and be always active, correct?

  They should NOT put just to 12 c, correct.

  Fix.  There is not currently a scheduled date for individuals with 11g as their highest certification of need to obtain a new certification.  If Oracle does not change their policy (unlikely), it will be a date in the future where it is practiced.  However, the upgrade to 11g will prolong the active life of their powers of Oracle by (I guess here) 2-3 years.

  Someone at work took the Oracle class in Chicago: Oracle 11 g new Featurers for administrators.

  They wanted to ensure that they would NOT have to take another training class Oracle.

  I don't know what you mean by "shall take".  Once you have OCP, Oracle requires no additional training for practical requirement - even if the certifications become inactive and must be reactivated. I guess you mean that he took the class because he wanted to prepare 1Z0 - 050. Based on this issue, he now wonders if he needed to go directly to 1Z0 - 060 rather (and therefore would like to take the new features in preparation for this test review 12 c).

• help the procedure...

  Hello world

  I created the following procedure to create a table and insert with select data, the procedure being executed very well but when I write a query using the table "mrsa_admit_date", and then he throws me an error with "table or view does not exist.

  Lost something here?

  With the help of oracle 11g

  create or replace PROCEDURE P_MRSA_STEP3 AS

  BEGIN

  run immediately 'truncate table mrsa_admit_date;

  insert into mrsa_admit_date

  Select A.pat_id, A.pat_enc_csn_id, P.hsp_account_id, min (A.effective_time) in the Admit_date

  of clarity_adt@clarprod A

  inner join mrsa_cms_units mcu

  On mcu.dept_id = A.department_id

  Join hsp_account@clarprod P internal

  On A.pat_enc_csn_id = P.prim_enc_csn_id

  -where

  -P.hsp_account_id = 12226392031

  -In (10610792118,41567152070)

  A.pat_id, A.pat_enc_csn_id, P.hsp_account_id group

  commit;

  END P_MRSA_STEP3;

  Thank you.

  Well it is because you have no code to create a table. You have a truncation, and then an insert.

• How to apply the procedure inside a procedure and the evils of the value in a variable?

  Hi all

  I'm usung oracle 11g.

  Here is my package and procedure

  I want to call get_email_details this procedure within the process_email_master and store the value in a variable in main proceedings

  create or replace

  PACKAGE ms_gen_process_email

  as

  type email_type is rendered (subject varchar2 (4000 tank),

  email_body varchar2 (4000 tank),

  to_receipent varchar2 (4000 tank),

  cc_receipent varchar2 (4000 char));

  type email_type_table is table of the email_type;

  procedure process_email_master)

  p_metric_name IN VARCHAR2,

  p_current_stage in varchar2,

  p_action in varchar2,

  p_pid number,

  P_OBJECT_ID in varchar2

  -p_emai_master on p_email_type_table

  );

  PROCEDURE get_email_details)

  p_metric_name IN VARCHAR2,

  p_current_stage in varchar2,

  P_ACTION in varchar2,

  p_email_type_table1 on email_type_table

  ) ;

  END ms_gen_process_email;

  ----

  create or replace

  PACKAGE ms_gen_process_email BODY

  as

  procedure process_email_master)

  p_metric_name IN VARCHAR2,

  p_current_stage in varchar2,

  p_action in varchar2,

  p_pid number,

  p_object_id in varchar2

  )

  as

  Start

  null;

  EXCEPTION

  WHILE OTHERS

  then

  null;

  end process_email_master;

  PROCEDURE get_email_details)

  p_metric_name IN VARCHAR2,

  p_current_stage IN VARCHAR2,

  P_ACTION in varchar2,

  p_email_type_table on email_type_table

  )

  as

  BEGIN

  Select the object, email_body, to_receipent, cc_receipent

  bulk collect into p_email_type_table

  of ms_gen_email_config_detail

  WHERE email_key =)

  SELECT email_key

  OF ms_gen_email_config

  WHERE metric_name = p_metric_name

  AND action p_action =

  and current_stage = p_current_stage

  );

  for me in p_email_type_table.first... loop of p_email_type_table. Last

  dbms_output.put_line (p_email_type_table (i) reserve .under | p_email_type_table (i) .email_body: p_email_type_table (i) .to_receipent: p_email_type_table (i) .cc_receipent);

  end loop;

  EXCEPTION

  WHILE OTHERS

  THEN

  NULL;

  END get_email_details;

  END ms_gen_process_email;

  but I get this error message

  Error (15,31): PLS-00201: identifier 'P_EMAIL_TYPE_TABLE' must be declared

  Concerning

  Dale

  See below the test case and change your code. You can call the procedure in detail within a main as procedure below

  CREATE or REPLACE PACKAGE test_pkg AS

  TYPE rec_val IS RECORD (empno, emp.empno%TYPE,

  Ename emp.ename%TYPE

  );

  TYPE nt_tabtest IS TABLE OF THE rec_val;

  PROCEDURE get_email_id (p_type to nt_tabtest);

  PROCEDURE get_email_master;

  END;

  /

  CREATE or REPLACE PACKAGE test_pkg BODY

  AS

  PROCEDURE get_email_id (p_type ON nt_tabtest)

  AS

  BEGIN

  SELECT EmpNo, ename COLLECT in BULK in p_type FROM emp;

  END;

  PROCEDURE get_email_master

  AS

  v_type nt_tabtest;

  BEGIN

  get_email_id (v_type);

  BECAUSE me IN v_type. FIRST... v_type. LAST

  LOOP

  DBMS_OUTPUT. Put_line (v_type (i) .empno: v_type (i) .ename);

  END LOOP;

  END;

  END;

  /

  Post edited by: 000000

• Query running beside the database successfully but in error in the procedure!

  Hi all
  
  I'm something get odd errors on in ODI 11 g.
  
  When I run the query to the database, it performs very well, and it creates a table.
  But when encorporate this query in the procedure, it gives me following error.
  
  ODI-1228: PROC_POZ_BOSS_OMP_BOSSWORKORDER (procedure) has failed on the staged target of connection ORACLE ODI POZ.
  Caused by: java.sql.SQLDataException: ORA-01843: not one month valid
  
  at oracle.jdbc.driver.SQLStateMapping.newSQLException(SQLStateMapping.java:79)
  
  I am convert Char to the data types Date in the Code.
  
  Details of the DB: - Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64 bit Production
  ODI Details:-Standalone Edition Version 11.1.1
  Build ODI_11.1.1.3.0_GENERIC_100623.1635
  
  What would be the reason for query next to the DB with success but in error next to the ODI?
  I'm really confused... :(
  Help me how can I fix this error?

  Hi Manu
  I think that I've already advised the same thing in your previous thread. It could be because NLS_DATE_FORMAT.
  Something weird situation while running the interface in ODi

  Thank you.

• How to see the variable data in time debugging the procedure in Toad oracle 9.1

  Hi all
  
  I'm not able to see the data variable at the procedure of debugging in Toad oracle 9.1.
  Any help would be appreciated.
  
  
  
  Kind regards
  Prakash P
  
  Published by: prakash on May 30, 2011 01:37
  
  Published by: prakash on May 30, 2011 01:37
  
  Published by: prakash on May 30, 2011 01:37

  You might be aware toad is not a product of Oracle, so you need this post on the forums of quest, http://www.questsoftware.com

  ----------
  Sybrand Bakker
  Senior Oracle DBA