Client based in 12 G load balancing

Similar Questions

• Load balancing ASA question - what IP I do direct clients too?

  I have 2 5520 with SSLVPN 50 user on each license. I want to use the VPN load-balancing feature. Must I send users to the address IP of Cluster? The documentation is not clear on this point.

  Thank you

  Justin

  That is right. You should have the VPN to connect on the LBS, not individual IP addresses cluster IP. Captain ASA will listen to connection requests to the IP cluster LB and based on the load either accepting the connection or automatically redirect to one of the ASAs Eve in the cluster. It must all be transparent to the user VPN connection.

• How do I see the actual clients in Apache access.log ip address when front-end is a load balancer.

  Dear.

  I use ebs 12.1.3 and db 11.2.0.3 OS OUL5x64

  in one applTier, I could see the ip address of the clients when they connect to the system in the access_log but

  with the average level has 2 servers AP1/AP2 configure with a LoadBalancer in front.

  verifying the connection in the Apache log file (access_log.1410393600) we see that the balancer IP address of load.

  Please let know us if he died to set up so that I can see in file access_log which client (Ip address) connected to Server (AP1 or AP2)

  Thanks in advance.

  Concerning

  Please see (how to show the Client IP address in The Access Log when using A load balancer (Doc ID 1355549.1)).

  Thank you

  Hussein

• NIC Teaming: ID v-port-based load balancing

  Hey all,.

  According to VMWare ESXi does not support physical host interfaces LACP trunks.  I was told that the NIC teaming feature will allow you to specify which physical interface traffic is pushed through the source IP/VM database.  I was able to locate the NIC teaming settings in load balancing vSwitch properties, but I cannot determine how to set up a specific virtual machine, vNIC or source/destination IP address to use a specific physical NIC

  Can someone tell me how to proceed?  The setting of balancing says "Route based on originating virtual port ID"...  This isn't not always tell me how to assign a virtual interface to a specific physical interface.  Ideally, I would like to specify a destination IP address and a physical interface to use when accessing this IP address.  Simply being able to map a group of virtual machines to use a physical interface (without going through the VM groups on different vSwitches) would do well.

  Any suggestion is appreciated.

  Thank you!

  -Ben

  Intellectual property of hash based mode, 1Gbit/s physics 2 network cards can be effectively combined in 1 2 Gbps link?  Meaning regardless of VM, source/destinaltion IP/network, traffic etc will be shared between the two network cards until they are both is completely saturated?

  No, certainly not. It's like Weinstein explained. The NETWORK card used is based on the source and destination IP.

  You can take a look at VMware Virtual Networking Concepts that explains the different modes in detail.

  Route based on the hash of the IP ... Regularity of the distribution of traffic depends on the number of TCP/IP sessions for unique destinations. There is no advantage for the bulk transfer between a single pair of hosts.

  André

• VPN on several ISP load balancing

  Hi all

  Please explaing on VPN load balancing based on a scenario where two Internet service providers are here. How can I configure vpn balance in such a scenario?

  Thank you

  Shijo.

  Hi Shijo

  What type of VPN connections you want to balance the load? VPN remote access right? You can essentially set up a cluster within your VPN to load device balanced local traffic, passing through the same ISP... but for a scenario with 2 different ISPS, this may seem a bit difficult... Just because of the fact that your vpn device will have two different IPs on the outer side and have to finish on two different interfaces... tracking and grouping two interfaces are difficult..., your VPN clients will point to a single IP address on the part of ISPS, and virtual IPs have in this case is difficult...

  Hope this helps... good luck...

  REDA

• RV042 load balancing problem

  We have two network connections coming into the office. One is a private Wan, and the other is a WAN on the internet. We have a RV042 router configured for load balancing. We have our private WAN which includes Exchange and 6 VPN Wan1. On WAN2, we have a public IP address and home workers. Both connections are 5 Mg T1s and both have the ability to access the internet but only wan2 has a public IP (76.x.x.x) were as WAN1 has a private IP address. (10.x.x.x).

  Were now the problem lies is our new website based on payroll, system does not support load balancing. We have on one hand stop when we do pay (Tower load balancing off.)

  Now is it possible to use our computers to pay only one side? change the host file maybe? Or force a certain MAC address of use only the WAN1 or is there a better router to achieve?

  Any help would be appreciated

  Peter Labelle

  I don't have a RV042 and have had reference to the Administrator's guide:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/routers/CSBR/RV042/Admin/Guide/RV042_V10_UG_C-Web.PDF

  I hope these comments are useful. Perhaps you can comment and let me know if it works for you. Check balancing load and the binding protocol section.  These changes are disruptive... Please assume a failure during the change.  Not a long interruption, but the sessions at the same distance could be lowered.

  Out, you can use the protocol binding. This could cause some problems with the VPN client... you can try this after hours?

  For entrants, how customers and remote computers know the accounting software?  You are advertising this IP address via a link or another?

  If you are, then you can have a preference through one of the links.  If you advertise this IP address then you will not be able to provide a preference to a supplier of services on the other.

  Do please see the Administrator's guide and let me know your thoughts.  Sincere greetings and HTH,

  Andrew Lissitz

• Reg Load Balancing

  Hello
  
  How to configure the load balancing server-side.
  
  I've seen two types of load in service and Session based.
  
  How to specify the options for all of the two
  
  I know by setting the load_balance = setting will now allow in the tnsnames.ora file.
  
  whether above parameter enable client side load balancing or server side load balancing
  
  Suggest me any document which explains as well for example.
  
  Thank you
  Krishna

  VV of Krishna wrote:
  Hello

  How to configure the load balancing server-side.

  This is done by using the Remote_listeners parameter.
  >

  I've seen two types of load in service and Session based.

  How to specify the options for all of the two

  Never heard of the two! Show us the reference for oracle documentation when they are mentioned.

  I know by setting the load_balance = setting will now allow in the tnsnames.ora file.

  whether above parameter enable client side load balancing or server side load balancing

  This allows for connection time load balancing client-side which is actually not a true one and 11.2 CARS, its not so need to be settled.

  Suggest me any document which explains as well for example.

  Let the oracle docs to be your friend,
  http://download.Oracle.com/docs/CD/E11882_01/RAC.112/e16795/hafeats.htm#RACAD7122

  HTH
  Aman...

  Thank you
  Krishna

• Correct settings to use Smart Connect and load balancing?

  Hi guys

  I have a question, the answer of which I was not able to find explicitly, so I hope a quick fix OK / not OK for you:

  I would use tri-band technology provides the R8000, i.e. to activate Smart Connect / load balancing. Is - it only works Ghzs 5 band, or the router can also connect clients on the 2 Ghz bands?

  If this is true, then I need to give the strip of 2, 4 GHz the SSID the same 5 Ghz band, correct?

  Otherwise, if it only works in the 5 Ghz bands, I could keep the SSID distinguishes?

  Thank you

  Balancing of resources between the two radios. 2, 4 GHz band vs a single radio, the two radio channels in the 5 GHz band.

• Limitation of the load balancing VPN3000

  Dear all,

  How many devices can be configured for balancing the load of solutions?

  What is the upper limit?

  Can I assume that if configure US 2 devices, the throughput will be be200 MB, flow of four aircraft is 400 MB, etc.?

  Any thoughts?

  Best regards

  Engel

  No, no, the traffic is not load balanced between all hubs in the group, that the connections are. For example, when you connect with a VPN client address bundle, concentrators determine what hub is lightly loaded, your connection is then completed and supplemented by this hub. All traffic goes between your client and the hub only, like any normal connection. There is no increase in bandwidth to this connection.

  In regard to the number of devices you use, we have tested successfully with 8, but there is no theoretical limit.

• Hi ALL, did any attempt on the virtual computer NETWORK load balancing using HYPERV on UCS blades

  I try to configure the CASE server cluster by using the Unicast NLB on the virtual machine on different blades on the UCS, it works for awhile, then he abandoned packages.

  I heard that this screenplay of unicast is not supported in the UCS when she used END-host mode in the fabric interconnet...? any attempted before.

  Would it, I use the multicast mode is that something needs to be done on the FBI62020 or the LAN switch upstream. ??

  Header note I found on the implementation of UCS for mulitcast NLBL:

  Microsoft NLB can be deployed in 3 modes:

  Unicast

  Multicast

  IGMP multicast

  For series B UCS deployments, we have seen that the multicast and IGMP multicast work.

  IGMP multicast mode seems to be the more reliable deployment mode.

  To do this, the monitoring settings:

  All NLB Microsoft value "Multicast IGMP" nodes.  Important!  Check ths by logging into EACH node independently.  Do not rely on the MMC of NLB snap.

  An IGMP applicant must be present on the VLAN of NLB.  If PIM is enabled on the VIRTUAL LAN that is your interrogator.  UCS cannot function as applicant IGMP.  If an interrogator of functioning is not present, NLB IGMP mode will not work.

  You must have a static ARP entry on cheating it upstream pointing IP address Unicast NLB on the multicast MAC address NETWORK load balancing.  This need will set up, of course, on the VLAN of the NLB VIP. The key is that the routing for the NLB VLAN interface must use this ARP entry as a unicast IP ARP response may not contain a multicast mac address. (Violation of the RFC 1812)  Hosts on the NLB VLAN must also use the static entry.  You may have several entries ARP.  IOS can use a function of 'alias' of ARP. (Google it.)

  How Microsoft NLB works. -The truncated for brevity Mac addresses.

  TOPOLOGY OF NLB MS

  NETWORK VLAN 10 = subnet 10.1.1.0/24 IP load balancing

  VIP = 10.1.1.10 NETWORK LOAD BALANCING

  Arp entry static switch advanced IP 10.1.1.10 upstream to MAC 01

  NLB VIP (MAC 01, IP 10.1.1.10)

  NODE-A (AA, MAC IP:10.1.1.88)

  NŒUD-B (MAC BB, IP:10.1.1.99)

  Using the IGMP snooping and interrogator VLAN snooping table is filled with the mac NLB address and groups pointing to the appropriate L2 ports.

  MS NLB nodes will send the responses of IGMP queries.

  This snooping table could take 30 to 60 seconds to complete.

  Host on VLAN 200 (10.200.1.35) sends traffic to NETWORK VIP (10.1.1.10) load balancing

  It goes of course to VLAN 10 interface that uses the static ARP entry to resolve to address MAC 01 VIP NETWORK load balancing.

  Since it is a multicast frame destination it will be forward by the IGMP snooping table.

  The framework will arrive at ALL NLB nodes. (NŒUD-A & NŒUD-B)

  NLB nodes will use its load balancing algorithm to determine which node will manage the TCP session.

  Only one NLB node will respond to this host with TCP ACK to start the session.

  NOTES

  This works in a VMware with N1k, standard vSwtich and vDS environment. Where surveillance IGMP is not enabled, the framing for VIP MAC NETWORK load balancing will be flooded.

  NLB can only work with TCP-based services.

  As stated previously mapping an IP unicast to a multicast mac address is a violation implied by RFC 1812.

  TROUBLESHOOTING

  Make sure your interrogator is working. Just to clarify that this does not mean that it is actually at work.

  Wireshark lets check that IGMP queries are received by the NLB nodes.

  Make sure that the ARP response works as expected.  Once Wireshark again is your friend.

  Look at the paintings IGMP snooping. Validate the L2 ports appearing as expected.

  CSCtx27555 [Bug-preview for CSCtx27555] Unknown multicast with destination outside the range MAC 01:xx: are deleted. (6200 FI fixed in 2.0.2m)

  IGMP mode not affected.

  CSCtx27555    Unknown multicast with destination outside the range MAC 01:xx: are deleted.

  http://Tools.Cisco.com/support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCtx27555

  fixed in 2.0(2m)

  Solution: Change the NLB mode of operation of "Multicast" to "multicast IGMP', which modifies balancing load NETWORK VIP MAC at 0100.5exx.xxx Beach, allows to transfer occur as expected.

  Q: and if I switch to switch mode, which means all of the profile and the settings on the servers are completely exhausted and I need to recreate them. ???

  A:Cisco Unified Computing System Ethernet switching Modes

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/solutions/collateral/ns340/ns517/ns224/ns944/whitepaper_c11-701962.html

  -There is no impact on the configuration, you have done service profiles.  they will continue to work as expected.  Mode selector has the FI behave more like a conventional switch.  Most notable is that Spanning tree will be activated and if you have several uplinks yew, tree covering weight will begin to block redundant paths.

  You need to review your topology and what impact tree covering weight.  Generally, we at the switch port upstream defined as "edge master", you want to delete this line.

  For pre-production and laboratory environment, PDI can help qualified with the planning, design and implementation partners.  Given to review the IDP site and open a case if you need more detailed assistance.

• Nexus 1000v, UCS, and Microsoft NETWORK load balancing

  Hi all

  I have a client that implements a new Exchange 2010 environment. They have an obligation to configure load balancing for Client Access servers. The environment consists of VMware vShpere running on top of Cisco UCS blades with the Nexus 1000v dvSwitch.

  Everything I've read so far indicates that I must do the following:

  1 configure MS in Multicast mode load balancing (by selecting the IGMP protocol option).

  2. create a static ARP entry for the address of virtual cluster on the router for the subnet of the server.

  3. (maybe) configure a static MAC table entry on the router for the subnet of the server.

  3. (maybe) to disable the IGMP snooping on the VLAN appropriate in the Nexus 1000v.

  My questions are:

  1. any person running successfully a similar configuration?

  2 are there missing steps in the list above, or I shouldn't do?

  3. If I am disabling the snooping IGMP on the Nexus 1000v should I also disable it on the fabric of UCS interconnections and router?

  Thanks a lot for your time,.

  Aaron

  Aaron,

  The steps above you are correct, you need steps 1-4 to operate correctly.  Normally people will create a VLAN separate to their interfaces NLB/subnet, to prevent floods mcast uncessisary frameworks within the network.

  To answer your questions

  (1) I saw multiple clients run this configuration

  (2) the steps you are correct

  (3) you can't toggle the on UCS IGMP snooping.  It is enabled by default and not a configurable option.  There is no need to change anything within the UCS regarding MS NLB with the above procedure.  FYI - the ability to disable/enable the snooping IGMP on UCS is scheduled for a next version 2.1.

  
  
  This is the correct method untill the time we have the option of configuring static multicast mac entries on
  
  the Nexus 1000v.  If this is a feature you'd like, please open a TAC case and request for bug CSCtb93725 to be linked to your SR.
  
  This will give more "push" to our develpment team to prioritize this request.
  Hopefully some other customers can share their experience.
  Regards,

  Robert

• Double connection ISP and load balancing

  Hi all

  I have the Cisco 2911 router k 9/s with 3 GB ports. I have also two different ISP connections, all have two different available bandwidth (one is asymmetrical, else a symmetrical).

  What I want to achieve is to ensure the balance of Nice load between two ISPS for all PCs behind the NAT device.

  What I know so far, it's that I can use CEF or PfR/REL. For both of this technology, I have some doubts.

  CEF: distributes the network load between the two connections based on sessions (which is good, because I strongly to use tools like Skype or Lync for audio/video conversations). However, what is happening, when I get on one of the ISP connections broadband bandwidth max? He's going to choke for 50% of the connections? Or it will detect the use of bandwidth and to force using second ISP?

  PfR/REL: as far as I understood it resolves my concern regarding the use of the connection, but what happens to the session? Should it also be based on this mechanism? As you know that it is very important for audio/video connections.

  Are there other tools that can provide these load balancing? I know DAB, but I don't want to decide manually, where each service (e.g. http or ssh) will have to go. I'm looking for something more automated.

  Thanks in advance for any help.

  Piotr

  Hello

  I assume that you have a static route for the subnet 213.192.65.0/24 on top of the output and with the combination of order

  network default IP 213.192.65.105 213.192.65.105 IP address is installed as a default gateway. What is the #2 ISP?

  If so, it explains why he always goes on ISP2 only.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094374.shtml#flagging

  Just remove the config:

  Noneip default-network 213.192.65.105

  Noneip default-gateway 213.192.65.105

  Then again check the routing table:

  SH ip route

  Hope it helps.

  Best regards
  Akim

• VPN load balancing

  Hello

  for Concentrators VPN load-balancing, a similar configuration must be to both devices. The master of the cluster config VPN concentrator push. for other members of the cluster, or must be manually?

  Thanks in advance

  Hi Abu Alqader,

  The decision to use load balancing or VRRP is a lot depends on your VPN environment.

  Personally, I think that load balancing is good/ideal if you have a lot of clients VPN, for example > 500 users. With 2 VPN3K of load balancing, you can share VPN connectivity between the boxes and will not weigh 1 VPN unit at any time. Also, if one of these boxes is down, affected vpn clients can still connect to the other device. But you must configure the VPN backup server in all the software VPN Client to achieve configuration.

  VRRP, however, has its own advantages. If the primary VPN device, all VPN Clients can still connect to a 1 modem router VPN, VRRP, allowing practically to the backup device to inherit/use primary/active VPN public IP (as the gateway). With regard to non max users, VRRP probably appropriate for the low-end model like 3005 (IPsec-200/50 clientless) & 3015 (IPSec 100/75 without client).

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/partner/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2284/products_data_sheet09186a00801d3b56.html

  However, the final decision depends on what option you feel better suite your environment. There is no right or wrong.

  Pls rate if find you this post will help you.

  Rgds,

  AK

• TMS 14.5 and redundancy with F5 load balancing

  Hello

  I'm looking in the installation guide for TMS 14.5 to design redundancy TMS with the F5 for one of my clients. I wonder if there is any requirement of specific network for the TMS1, TMS2 and F5 must be in the same VLAN or not. My client have a TMS with TMSPE and deploy the TMS Server 2nd in different data center and will use existing F5 load balancing. They cannot have the same VLAN as a current TMS server in the new data where 2nd MSDS server will be Center. Existing F5 load balancing is also, in the VLAN different already.

  y at - there no specific review we need to take care of the redundancy?

  Thank you

  Chris

  As the TMS 14.4, TMS no longer an active/active load-balanced mode and now works as active/passive.

  You can find the details in the "Configure a redundant deployment" section of the Installation of TMS and Upgrade Guide (latest version 14.6 related).

  As long as both devices are accessible (and your F5 can route traffic to each of them according to the needs), it does not matter what VLAN, subnet or a location that each MSDS server resides on.  Information of VLAN in the guide are just one example of how it can be configured in a simple load balancing scenario.

  Wayne
  --
  Remember the frequency responses and mark your question as answered as appropriate.

• Log Insight 3.0 integrated Load Balancer application

  So I have a cluster of Log Insight of three nodes and active integrated load balancer entered the IP address and domain FULL that my clients are pointing to. Everything is good so far.

  I'd like to understand how balance really works, i.e. If one of the nodes becomes unavailable id still wait to be able to ping the address of the ILB?  the behavouir can I see at the moment is when the master is down so is the address of the ILB, is - this planned?

  Yes if your IP ILB was linked to the master, when he went to bed, the ILB IP is supported by another node, which explains why the ingestion continues. Which means that you can ping the IP, but if you access the UI through the VIP it tries to go to the user interface of the master master having died the user interface is not available.