combination of queries:

bank_id, COUNT (*) select 1) CONFIGURED TERMINALINFO group by BANK_ID

(2) select bank_id, COUNT (*) CONNECTED, SUM(CASE WHEN station_status = 'UP' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) UP_STATUS, SUM(CASE WHEN station_status = 'DOWN' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) DOWN_STATUS of terminalinfo where station_status in ('UP', 'DOWN')
and LAST_CONNECTED between January 31, 2012 00:00:00 ' and 31 January 2012 23:59:59 '
Bank_id group;

Can I combine the two queries and produce the result.

If you could provide examples of data that would allow the results to check, but I think that will do...

 SELECT bank_id,
        COUNT(*) configured,
        COUNT(CASE
                  WHEN station_status IN ('UP', 'DOWN')
                  AND  last_connected BETWEEN TO_DATE('31/01/2012 00:00:00','dd/mm/yyyy hh24:mi:ss')
                                          AND TO_DATE('31/01/2012 23:59:59','dd/mm/yyyy hh24:mi:ss')
                  THEN
                      1
                  END
              ) connected,
        SUM(CASE
                WHEN station_status = 'UP'
                AND  last_connected BETWEEN TO_DATE('31/01/2012 00:00:00','dd/mm/yyyy hh24:mi:ss')
                                    AND TO_DATE('31/01/2012 23:59:59','dd/mm/yyyy hh24:mi:ss')
                THEN
                 1
            END) up_status,
        SUM(CASE
                WHEN station_status = 'DOWN'
                AND  last_connected BETWEEN TO_DATE('31/01/2012 00:00:00','dd/mm/yyyy hh24:mi:ss')
                                    AND TO_DATE('31/01/2012 23:59:59','dd/mm/yyyy hh24:mi:ss')
                THEN
                 1
            END) down_status
 FROM
      terminalinfo
 GROUP  BY bank_id;

HTH

David

Published by: Bravid on January 31, 2012 13:21

Tags: Database

Similar Questions

Combine 2 queries 1 result online results
OK so I have 2 requests from 2 different tables, and I'm combining them into a single request as follows:

Select * from
(select col1 from tblA where col1 = 'val1'),
(select col2 from tblB where col2 = 'val2') b

and the results back as (I expect only 1 result of each query):

col1, col2
=== ===
AA... 11

The problem is that when one of the subqueries returns no result, all of the query returns no results. I want a line of output, even if a query returns no results, as such:

col1, col2
=== ===
AA... NULL VALUE

OR

col1, col2
=== ===
NULL VALUE... 11

I looked at the different types of joins and unions, but have had trouble finding something simple that returns a single row - of the suggestions?

Published by: 917372 on February 27, 2012 16:28

Published by: 917372 on February 27, 2012 16:28

Published by: 917372 on February 27, 2012 16:29

Published by: 917372 on February 27, 2012 16:31
Hello

Welcome to the forum!

Here's one way:
```
SELECT     (SELECT col1 FROM tblA WHERE col1 = 'val1')     AS col1
,     (SELECT col2 FROM tblB WHERE col2 = 'val2')      AS col2
FROM     dual;
```
This will work as long as the two subqueries return 0 or 1 rank. If it is 0, the corresponding column will be NULL, as you requested.

You could also each table of double outer join, or do an OUTER JOIN COMPLETE queries under 2. I think that the approach of scalar subquery (above) is the easiest way.

combinations, nested queries
Hello everyone,

We need to change technologies according to the needs of the company and we would like to understand request.

Select t1.fld1 as class, v2.section, v1.duration,
T1.fld2 as start_date, end_date as t1.fld3,
(t1.fld2 + v2.section - 1) as sectiondate
Of
(select Fld1 as class, ((fld3-fld2) + 1) as the length)
from t1
) v1
, (select rownum as object section where rownum < 180) v2
t1
where t1.fld1 = v1.class
and v2.section < = v1.duration
rownum, nest queries, dot operator and combinations make us confused.
We need help with this.

Thanks in advance,

NY
Hello

I don't have your question. In your request, that you do not use one of the columns object, you simply use a virtual column rownum to get an output of 180 lines with value 1-179. This array with the value 1 to 179 you set v2 table in your SQL.

Concerning

Need help combining 3 queries

Hello ~

I have several queries I want to be able to combine to get a report that looks like this:

Troop property damage accident death
7 2 1 B
7 D 0 0
A 6 1 0
F 2 0 0
Totals: 22 3 1

Here are my questions below:

select distinct officer_troop as "Troop",
         accident as "Accident",
         accident_type as "Type", 
         count(accident_type) as "Property Damage"
from   pursuit
where accident_type = 'PROPERTY'

union all

select count(accident_type)AS "INJURY"
from pursuit
where accident_type = 'INJURY'

union all

select count(accident_type)AS "FATALITY"
from pursuit
where accident_type = 'FATALITY'

group by officer_troop,accident_type,accident
order by count(accident_type) desc;

I am able to get the first request appears correctly, but when I try to add the second and the third query, it does not display the way I want to.

Anyone able to help? Thank you

Deanna

It seems that you need a pivot query, rather than a set of union alls

for example:

select officer_troop as "Troop",
         sum(decode(accident_type, 'PROPERTY', 1, 0)  "Property Damage"
from   pursuit
group by officer_troop

I'll leave it to you to add additional columns as needed

The combination of queries? (division)
{color: #000080} I have two queries what results I use to get the rate or percentage. Here they are: {color}

< pre >
SELECT
COUNT (hd. ENTRY_ID)
Of
HPD_HELP_DESK_ASSIGNMENT_LOG,
HPD_HELP_DESK hd,
CTM_SUPPORT_GROUP ResolvedByGroup,
CTM_SUPPORT_GROUP,
CTM_SUPPORT_GROUP_ASSOC_LOOKUP
WHERE
HD. REPORTED_DATE & gt; = ((SYSDATE-TO_DATE (' 01/01/1970 00:00:00 ',' JJ-MM-AAAA HH24:Mi:SS')) * (24*60*60))-(24*60*60) reported 24 past hours. AND (hd.)) ASSIGNED_GROUP = "SERVICEDESK" GOLD hd. ASSIGNED_GROUP = "Z-SERVICEDESK") AND (hd. RESOLVED_BY_GROUP = "SERVICEDESK" GOLD hd. RESOLVED_BY_GROUP = "Z-SERVICEDESK") AND hd.resolved_by_group = hd.assigned_group AND hd.total_transfers = 0 AND (hd. LAST_RESOLVED_DATE - hd. REPORTED_DATE) & lt; (60 * 60 * 1) resolved in 1hours
AND hd. AUTHOR = hd. ASSIGNEE_LOGIN_ID
AND hd. SERVICE_TYPE = 0

AND
(HPD_HELP_DESK_ASSIGNMENT_LOG. INCIDENT_ENTRY_ID ()) = hd. ENTRY_ID)
AND (CTM_SUPPORT_GROUP_ASSOC_LOOKUP. Login_id = hd. TRANSMITTER)
AND (CTM_SUPPORT_GROUP_ASSOC_LOOKUP. DEFAULT_X = 0)
AND (CTM_SUPPORT_GROUP. SUPPORT_GROUP_ID (+) is hd. ASSIGNED_GROUP_ID)
AND (hd. RESOLVED_BY_GROUP = ResolvedByGroup.SUPPORT_GROUP_NAME (+))
AND
(
CTM_SUPPORT_GROUP_ASSOC_LOOKUP. SUPPORT_GROUP_NAME in ('service DESK', "Z-SERVICEDESK")
AND
TRUNC (hd. REPORTED_DATE / 86400 + TO_DATE('12/31/1969 5:00:00 PM','MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM')) BETWEEN to_date (October 28, 2008 ', 'dd-mm-yyyy') AND to_date (October 28, 2008 ', 'dd-mm-yyyy')
)
< / pre >

{color: #000080}

and {color}

< pre >
SELECT
COUNT (hd. ENTRY_ID)
Of
HPD_HELP_DESK hd,
CTM_SUPPORT_GROUP_ASSOC_LOOKUP
WHERE
HD. REPORTED_DATE & gt; = ((SYSDATE-TO_DATE (' 01/01/1970 00:00:00 ',' JJ-MM-AAAA HH24:Mi:SS')) * (24*60*60))-(24*60*60) - reported past 24 hours.)) AND hd. SERVICE_TYPE = 0 AND (CTM_SUPPORT_GROUP_ASSOC_LOOKUP. Login_id = hd. SUBMITTER) AND (CTM_SUPPORT_GROUP_ASSOC_LOOKUP. DEFAULT_X = 0) AND ( CTM_SUPPORT_GROUP_ASSOC_LOOKUP.) SUPPORT_GROUP_NAME In ('Service DESK', "Z-SERVICEDESK") AND TRUNC (hd. SUBMIT_DATE / 86400 + TO_DATE('12/31/1969 5:00:00 PM','MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM')) BETWEEN to_date (October 28, 2008 ', 'dd-mm-yyyy') AND to_date (October 28, 2008 ', 'dd-mm-yyyy') ) < / pre > {color: #000080}

all I get as a result of the first query is divided by the result of the second query. Is it possible to combine these two queries and come up with one that gives me the percentage/rate?

Thanks in advance! {color}
In a very simplistic way, they can be combined like this:
```
WITH t1 AS
 (SELECT COUNT( hd.ENTRY_ID ) c1
 FROM HPD_HELP_DESK_ASSIGNMENT_LOG
 , HPD_HELP_DESK hd
 , CTM_SUPPORT_GROUP ResolvedByGroup
 , CTM_SUPPORT_GROUP
 , CTM_SUPPORT_GROUP_ASSOC_LOOKUP
 WHERE hd.REPORTED_DATE >=(( SYSDATE - TO_DATE( '1-1-1970 00:00:00', 'MM-DD-YYYY HH24:Mi:SS' ) ) *( 24 * 60 * 60 ) ) -( 24 * 60 * 60 ) --Reported last 24 hrs.
 AND ( hd.ASSIGNED_GROUP = 'SERVICEDESK'
 OR hd.ASSIGNED_GROUP = 'Z-SERVICEDESK' )
 AND ( hd.RESOLVED_BY_GROUP = 'SERVICEDESK'
 OR hd.RESOLVED_BY_GROUP = 'Z-SERVICEDESK' )
 AND hd.resolved_by_group = hd.assigned_group
 AND hd.total_transfers = 0
 AND ( hd.LAST_RESOLVED_DATE - hd.REPORTED_DATE ) <( 60 * 60 * 1 ) --resolved within 1hours
 AND hd.SUBMITTER = hd.ASSIGNEE_LOGIN_ID
 AND hd.SERVICE_TYPE = 0
 AND ( HPD_HELP_DESK_ASSIGNMENT_LOG.INCIDENT_ENTRY_ID(+) = hd.ENTRY_ID )
 AND ( CTM_SUPPORT_GROUP_ASSOC_LOOKUP.LOGIN_ID = hd.SUBMITTER )
 AND ( CTM_SUPPORT_GROUP_ASSOC_LOOKUP.DEFAULT_X = 0 )
 AND ( CTM_SUPPORT_GROUP.SUPPORT_GROUP_ID(+) = hd.ASSIGNED_GROUP_ID )
 AND ( hd.RESOLVED_BY_GROUP = ResolvedByGroup.SUPPORT_GROUP_NAME(+) )
 AND ( CTM_SUPPORT_GROUP_ASSOC_LOOKUP.SUPPORT_GROUP_NAME IN( 'SERVICEDESK', 'Z-SERVICEDESK' )
 AND TRUNC( hd.REPORTED_DATE / 86400 + TO_DATE( '12/31/1969 5:00:00 PM', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM' ) )
 BETWEEN to_date( '28-10-2008', 'dd-mm-yyyy' ) AND to_date( '28-10-2008', 'dd-mm-yyyy' ) )
 )
 , t2 AS
 (SELECT COUNT( hd.ENTRY_ID ) c2
 FROM HPD_HELP_DESK hd
 , CTM_SUPPORT_GROUP_ASSOC_LOOKUP
 WHERE hd.REPORTED_DATE >=(( SYSDATE - TO_DATE( '1-1-1970 00:00:00', 'MM-DD-YYYY HH24:Mi:SS' ) ) *( 24 * 60 * 60 ) ) -( 24 * 60 * 60 ) --Reported last 24 hrs.
 AND hd.SERVICE_TYPE = 0
 AND ( CTM_SUPPORT_GROUP_ASSOC_LOOKUP.LOGIN_ID = hd.SUBMITTER )
 AND ( CTM_SUPPORT_GROUP_ASSOC_LOOKUP.DEFAULT_X = 0 )
 AND ( CTM_SUPPORT_GROUP_ASSOC_LOOKUP.SUPPORT_GROUP_NAME IN( 'SERVICEDESK', 'Z-SERVICEDESK' )
 AND TRUNC( hd.SUBMIT_DATE / 86400 + TO_DATE( '12/31/1969 5:00:00 PM', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM' ) )
 BETWEEN to_date( '28-10-2008', 'dd-mm-yyyy' ) AND to_date( '28-10-2008', 'dd-mm-yyyy' ) )
 )
 SELECT c1 / c2 FROM t1, t2;
```
Not knowing a lot about your tables and the selectivity of your questions, I am not sure how to move the two counts in the same query. You say that the first query is more selective than the second, so any effort to combine the two need to widen the scope of records returned by the first query must match that of the second query without losing selectivity of the County is in the first. This can be possible by relaxing the requirements in the where clause and moving them in a CASE statement in the COUNT function:
```
COUNT(CASE WHEN expression THEN hd.entry_id ELSE null END)
```
Published by: Sentinel on October 28, 2008 09:22

combining two queries?
Table 1: importContact (e-mail, name, userIDFK, contactIDFK)
Table 2: users (e-mail, name, userIDFK)

Currently Im using two queries to insert lines in importContact to achieve what I want:

(1) INSERT INTO importedContacts (email, name, userIDFK) VALUES (EMAIL HERE, NAME HERE, name of USER HERE)

(2) importedContacts UPDATE I have
SET i.contactIDFK = (SELECT u.userID FROM users WHERE i.email = u.email u)
WHERE userIDFK =? AND EXISTS (SELECT u.userID FROM users WHERE i.email = u.email u)

How I would combine the above two questions so instead of inserting first email, name, user name and contactIDFK then to do it in a single query
As
```
INSERT INTO importedContacts
(email,name,userIDFK, contactIdFK )
VALUES
(EMAIL HERE,NAME HERE,USERID HERE, (SELECT u.userID FROM users u WHERE u.email = 'Email here') ) 
```

You can combine multiple queries in one?

I have a table of database options for additions to homes. I have another table for the categories for these options. Now I do a lot of queries for each individual category of the options. It looks like this:
< / cfquery >
< cfquery datasource = "applewood" username = "username" password = "password" name = "getCategory2" >
SELECT *.
From op_categories WHERE idOpCategories = 3
< / cfquery >
< cfquery datasource = "applewood" username = "username" password = "password" name = "getCategory3" >
SELECT *.
From op_categories WHERE idOpCategories = 4
< / cfquery >
.. and so on. Is there a way to make 1 query that finds each WHERE clause? I want it to look at this on a single page:
Category 1 category 2 category 3
--------------- ----------------- ----------------
Option 1 Option 1 Option 1
Option 2 Option 2 Option 2
Option 3 Option 3 Option 3
Any help would be appreciated.

What of this...

SELECT *.

Of op_categories WHERE idOpCategories in (3.4)

Help to combine the two queries with dependencies

Combining two queries with dependencies:
First ask: Returns USER_ID that has a type of access to a table with the OWNER (I also shoot the TLA of the USER_ID standard: ' of TLA #)

Select distinct SUBSTR (DBA_USERS. Username, 2, 3) AS TLA

DBA_USERS. Username USED_ID

DBA_TAB_PRIVS. Owner OWNER

from DBA_USERS

DBA_ROLE_PRIVS

DBA_TAB_PRIVS

where DBA_USERS. Username = DBA_ROLE_PRIVS. Dealer

and DBA_USERS.default_tablespace not in ('SYSTEM', "SYSAUX")

and DBA_USERS. Username like would be %'

and DBA_ROLE_PRIVS. Granted_role = DBA_TAB_PRIVS. Dealer

and SUBSTR (DBA_USERS. Username, 2, 3) <>DBA_TAB_PRIVS. Owner

;

Example of results (red font used in the last citation):

TLA USED_ID OWNER

--- ------------------------------ ------------------------------

DGTX999 GTX GRR

DGTX999 GTX ABG

DGTX999 GTX HTC

FWS DFWS999 GRR

OCN DOCN999 GRR

RHR DRHR999 DAS

ETM DETM999 DAS

FWS DFWS995 DAS

CD DCDS999 DAS

ABE DABE999 DAS

Second request: matches the USER name (same standards as above) and MACHINES (filter PC connections) and the number of connections made of

Select DBA_USERS. Username

DBA_HIST_ACTIVE_SESS_HISTORY. Machine

COUNT (*) AS CONN_COUNT

of DBA_HIST_ACTIVE_SESS_HISTORY

DBA_USERS

where DBA_HIST_ACTIVE_SESS_HISTORY. User_id = DBA_USERS. User_id

and DBA_USERS. Username like would be %'

and DBA_HIST_ACTIVE_SESS_HISTORY. Machine not as "WINAD%\%-%".

Group of DBA_USERS. Username

DBA_HIST_ACTIVE_SESS_HISTORY. Machine

order by 1

3 desc;

Example of results (red font used in the last citation):

MACHINE CONN_COUNT USERNAME

--------------- ------------------------- ----------

DFWS999 home13e0 7557

DGAM800 vu1246 37

DGAM999 vu1246 2558

DABE999 back18cb 4639

DINL888 home162f 84

DFWS999 WINDAD\OMHQ58BF 178

DCDS999 back18cb 788

DGTX999 home18c8 7

DGTX999 home13d3 62

DOCN999 vu1261 44

DFWS999 back1976 3

DCDS999 home18c8 173

DGTX999 home19c9 13

What I'd like to have (just made two first USER_IDs from the first query) (COL duplicated for each separate owner 1-4). So 3 machines and 3 owners would result in 9 lines (I could reorganize the collar and use a 'pause'):

TLA USED_ID MACHINE CONN_COUNT OWNER

--- ------------------------------ ------------------------- ---------- ------------------------------

GTX DGTX999 home13d3 62 GRR

Home18c8 GTX DGTX999 7 GRR

DGTX999 GTX home19c9 GRR 6

GTX DGTX999 home13d3 62 ABG

DGTX999 GTX home18c8 ABG 7

DGTX999 GTX home19c9 6 GBS

GTX DGTX999 home13d3 62 CTH

DGTX999 GTX HTC 7 home18c8

DGTX999 GTX home19c9 6 HTC

FWS DFWS999 home13e0 7557 GRR

FWS DFWS999 WINDAD\OMHQ58BF 178 GRR

FWS DFWS999 back1976 GRR 3

So it would be logically read: TLA as USER_ID of MACHINE, CONN_COUNT consultation times: OWNER information.

Thought as only those with the necessary values. Just try this and let me know in the case of all conflicts in the output.

WITH T1 AS)

Select distinct SUBSTR (DBA_USERS. Username, 2, 3) AS TLA

DBA_USERS. Username USED_ID

DBA_TAB_PRIVS. Owner OWNER

ROWNUM RN

from DBA_USERS

DBA_ROLE_PRIVS

DBA_TAB_PRIVS

where DBA_USERS. Username = DBA_ROLE_PRIVS. Dealer

and DBA_USERS.default_tablespace not in ('SYSTEM', "SYSAUX")

and DBA_USERS. Username like would be %'

and DBA_ROLE_PRIVS. Granted_role = DBA_TAB_PRIVS. Dealer

and SUBSTR (DBA_USERS. Username, 2, 3) <> DBA_TAB_PRIVS. Owner),

() AS T2

Select DBA_USERS. Username

DBA_HIST_ACTIVE_SESS_HISTORY. Machine

COUNT (*) AS CONN_COUNT

of DBA_HIST_ACTIVE_SESS_HISTORY

DBA_USERS

where DBA_HIST_ACTIVE_SESS_HISTORY. User_id = DBA_USERS. User_id

and DBA_USERS. Username like would be %'

and DBA_HIST_ACTIVE_SESS_HISTORY. Machine not as "WINAD%\%-%".

Group of DBA_USERS. Username

DBA_HIST_ACTIVE_SESS_HISTORY. Machine

order by 1

3 desc)

SELECT T1. TLA

, T1. USED_ID

, T2. MACHINE

, T2. CONN_COUNT

, T1. OWNER

FROM T1

T2

WHERE T1. USED_ID = T2. USER NAME;

Combine queries to get the result set with max Y

Hello
I use forms 6i and db 10.2.0.1.0

With the query below

Select ufam_usrgrp,ufam_filegrp,ufam_read,ufam_write,ufam_overwrite,ufam_delete from usr_file_access_master
Where ufam_ecode = '0004108';

the result set is

UFAM_USRGRP     UFAM_FILEGRP    UFA UFA UFA UFA
--------------- --------------- --- --- --- ---
MGMNT           CV              Y   Y   Y   Y
EMPLOYEE        GENERAL         Y   N   N   N
EMPLOYEE        PERSONAL        Y   N   N   N

Another query

Select uul_usrgrp, ufl_file_grp,ufl_read,ufl_write,ufl_overwrite,ufl_delete from usr_usrgrp_lnk,USRGRP_FILEGRP_LINK
Where usr_usrgrp_lnk.uul_usrgrp = USRGRP_FILEGRP_LINK.UFL_USR_GRP
and usr_usrgrp_lnk.uul_ecode = '0004108'

gives the result

UUL_USRGRP      UFL_FILE_GRP    UFL UFL UFL UFL
--------------- --------------- --- --- --- ---
MGMNT           GENERAL         Y   Y   Y   Y
EMPLOYEE        GENERAL         Y   Y   N   N
MGMNT           CV              Y   N   N   N

I need to combine these two queries to get a separate result set with maximum Y

Like here "MGMNT CV" is repeated in both the result set, but the first has more, then it should come from the combined result set. reverse-case also the same (such as "EMPLOYEE GENERAL")

So I want to combine the queries so that I get the result as set below

UserGroup       FileGroup       Rd Wrt Owrt Del
--------------- --------------- --- --- --- ---
MGMNT           GENERAL         Y   Y   Y   Y
EMPLOYEE        GENERAL         Y   Y   N   N
MGMNT           CV              Y   Y   Y   Y
EMPLOYEE        PERSONAL        Y   N   N   N

Please help me to combine these queries

Published by: Divya on August 14, 2011 21:24
Changed the result set and the last exit

NOT TESTED!

select y.uul_usrgrp,
       y.ufl_file_grp,
       greatest(ufl_read,nvl(ufam_read,' ')) ufl_read,
       greatest(ufl_write,nvl(ufam_write,' ')) ufl_write,
       greatest(ufl_overwrite,nvl(ufam_overwrite,' ')) ufl_overwrite,
       greatest(ufl_delete,nvl(ufam_delete,' ')) ufl_delete
  from (select ufam_usrgrp,ufam_filegrp,ufam_read,ufam_write,ufam_overwrite,ufam_delete
          from usr_file_access_master
         Where ufam_ecode = '0004108'
       ) x,
       (select uul_usrgrp, ufl_file_grp,ufl_read,ufl_write,ufl_overwrite,ufl_delete
          from usr_usrgrp_lnk,USRGRP_FILEGRP_LINK
         Where usr_usrgrp_lnk.uul_usrgrp = USRGRP_FILEGRP_LINK.UFL_USR_GRP
           and usr_usrgrp_lnk.uul_ecode = '0004108'
       ) y
 where y.uul_usrgrp = x.ufam_usrgrp(+)
   and y.ufl_file_grp = x.ufam_filegrp(+)

Concerning

Etbin

Edited by: Etbin on 14.8.2011 13:08
deleted by group

How to combine multiple regex queries in a script?

Hello
is it possible to combine several queries regex in JavaScript? I export text from a database with custom labels and regex queries interpret the text AND character style replacements.
example of
Let's say my exported text is as follows
"I have a very large text of < tag_bold > < / tag_bold > that includes a large number of styles of different characters, such as < tag_bold >"BOLD"< / tag_bold >, < tag_italic > italic < / tag_italic >, < tag_bold >"BOLD"with certain < tag_bold_underline > underlined words < / tag_bold_underline > < / tag_bold >. ,
«to the words with different < tag_size-2 > text size < / tag_size-2 >»
The result I want is
"I have a very large text that includes a large number of styles of different characters, such as bold, italic,
"BOLD", with a few words that are underlined, or never words with different text size.
Note that all the tags open and close in the same paragraph and there's nested pairs of tags in some cases. If I run my requests (more than 20) of the outer pair the inner exception, i.e.:
< tag_bold >... < / tag_bold >
< tag_italic >... < / tag_italic >
< tag_size-2 >... < / tag_size-2 >
< tag_bold_underline >... < / tag_bold_underline >
Thanks in advance for your help
DPS

If your character style name and tag name so I think it's a complete solution for you

try code below:

myDoc var = app.activeDocument;

var charastyles = myDoc.characterStyles.everyItem () .name;

for (a = 1;

{

repl_charastyles (charastyles [a])

}

function repl_charastyles (charstyle)

{

app.changeGrepPreferences = NothingEnum.nothing;

app.findGrepPreferences = NothingEnum.nothing;

app.findGrepPreferences.findWhat = '<' +="" charstyle="" +="" '="">' + '(.+?)';

app.changeGrepPreferences.changeTo = ' $1 ';

app.changeGrepPreferences.appliedCharacterStyle = charstyle;

app.activeDocument.changeGrep ();

app.changeGrepPreferences = NothingEnum.nothing;

app.findGrepPreferences = NothingEnum.nothing;

}

Shonky

Need help with the use of GROUP BY in a select statement UNION

I am writing a query that allows to combine a legacy system that interfaces it is trial balance in the Oracle of R12 GL. It was only meant to continue for a month or two, but it is likely to continue for 6 months. Please Auditors Auditors, to provide proof that the system is in balance with Oracle GL. By my verification requirements, I need to make a full reconciliation from the month of conversion (life in the amount of date), then PTD for each month.

The legacy account is placed in attribute1 on the lines of the journals. Uses of the old system balancing segments that are also used on the platform in Oracle for this division, i.e., Procure-to-Pay has been cut over Oracle, but not everything yet. So, I can't count on the GL_BALANCES table for the info, I get from the JE_LINES.

My problem is not the only request for the month. But when I try to combine the queries with a Union, to aggregation of each measurement period in its own column, the group is necessary after each selected instruction rather than allowing me to put at the end of the UNION. (When I put the group by at the end of the UNION, I have the 'not one group' function)

So I get duplicate for each month of discrete measure accounts. When I duplicate in my Oracle database accounts, I can't count on the VLOOKUP function in excel to exactly match an account of inheritance. I know there are more sophisticated ways to provide this output, but I'm hoping to get this info in a simple query.

Thank you in advance for any advice you can provide

Example of data output (the goal for me is to get the two rows to appear as one based on common points on the LEGACY_ACCOUNT and the ORACLE ACCOUNT

The LEGACY ACCOUNT	ORACLE ACCOUNT	JUN_15	JUL_15	AUG_15	SEP_15	OCT_15	NOV_15	DEC_15
010000001109000003584	190-600552-1001-100231-000-0000-0000-0000	0	0	-242961.04	0	0	0	0
010000001109000003584	190-600552-1001-100231-000-0000-0000-0000	0	192588.02	0	0	0	0	0

Here is a simplified version of my code that returns both records. In my research, I had found a number of conversations where it has been shown that the group could be put at the end of the select statement. However, when I remove the group from the first select statement I get SQL error: ORA-00937: not a function of simple-group

Select

l.attribute1 LEGACY_ACCOUNT,

JUN_15 TO_NUMBER('0').

JUL_15, sum (NVL(l.accounted_dr,0.00)-NVL(l.accounted_cr,0.00)),

TO_NUMBER('0') AUG_15.

TO_NUMBER('0') SEP_15.

TO_NUMBER('0') OCT_15.

TO_NUMBER('0') NOV_15.

DEC_15 TO_NUMBER('0')

b GL.gl_je_batches,

GL.gl_je_headers h,

GL.gl_je_lines l,

GL.gl_code_combinations c,

GL.gl_je_sources_tl j

where b.je_batch_id = h.je_batch_id

and h.je_header_id = l.je_header_id

and l.code_combination_id = c.code_combination_id

and h.je_source = j.je_source_name

and c.segment1 ('190 ', '191', '192', '193', '194', ' 195 ', ' 196',' 197', ' 198 ', ' 199',)

('200 ', '203', ' 205', '206 ', '330', '331', '332',' 333 ', ' 334',' 335', ' 336 ', ' 337')

and j.language = 'en '.

and h.PERIOD_NAME ("JUL-15'")

Group

l.attribute1,

UNION