Create locally managed Tablespace

Similar Questions

• create the table with the parameters of storage in a locally managed tablespace

  Hello
  Can we create object with the parameters of storage in a locally managed tablespace.
  
  CREATE TABLE my_hash_table_6)
  name VARCHAR2 (30),
  value VARCHAR2 (4000))
  STORAGE)
  INITIAL 1 M
  NEXT 512K
  PCTINCREASE 0
  MINEXTENTS 2
  MAXEXTENTS UNLIMITED)
  
  
  default tablespace users is successful locallly.
  Then extended this table management will be managed according to the tablespace or storage settings which
  has been specified when the table was created.

  Hello

  This means that we don't have to define NEXT, PCTINCREASE, MAXEXTENTS at the object level.
  Then, these settings are applicable to Dictionary managed tablespace or what?

  Yes that's right, understand you is correct

  Can we define NEXT, PCTINCREASE, MAXEXTENTS at the level of the object in the dictionary managed tablespace;

  Yes, you can, but go for DMT, is not very good, because you advantages compared to LMT, just think about it before going to the DMT, than I suggest.

  -Pavan Kumar N
  Oracle 9i / 10g - OCP
  http://oracleinternals.blogspot.com/

• locally managed tablespace and confused fragmentation

  Hello
  
  I understand that its impossible to have a locally managed tablespace fragmentation, but when I run the following query I get
  

  select
  tablespace_name,
  COUNT(*) cnt_free_chunk,
  decode( round((max(BYTES) / 1024),2), 
  null,0, round((max(BYTES) / 1024),2)) largest_chunk
  from dba_free_space
  group by tablespace_name
  order by 2 desc ,1
  
  TABLESPACE_NAME                CNT_FREE_CHUNK              LARGEST_CHUNK
  ------------------------------              --------------                         -------------
  USR_IDX_TBS                         1739                               2359296

  The tablespace shows it was not plugged and uses LMT with SAMS.

  user9243284, you should not assimilate several free extensions as meaing the free space is fragmented even for dictionary managed tablespaces, much less for those locally managed.

  Really, what determines if the tablespace freespace is fragmented, it's if the available free space can be used or not when objects extend. You must map the extents of tablespace to get a better idea if the number of extensions of the free space indicates a problem could exist.

  In the case of a tablespace locally managed with uniform extents, free space fragmentation is impossible, because never available to what extent is the same size for each request for space is satisfied until there is no free extensions.

  However when-auto-assignment is a range of sizes of measurement are used where each larger size is a multiple of the previous size, which reduces the changes of Oracle is not able to respond to a request for free measure; However, contrary to belief the automatic assignment method does not eliminate completely the free space fragmentation.

  It is always possible to have a request for lack of space automatic sub-allotment when the total free space exceeds the amount of space requested. This can occur in two situations:

  First of all, the tablespace has been converted into place of dictionary to locally managed. Existing objects are not affected by the conversion so any existence before the conversion disorder still exists after the conversion.

  Second, where there are a few large objects stored with many small objects and the tablespace data files are either fixed in size max extended nearby, then it is possible to have a request for an extension of the free fail even if the total free space is greater than the measure requested. Say you want to 8 M and the tablespace has 40 M free. It may be that none of the extents are contiguous, if the request fails. Now, with a request for 64 M, Oracle will resign the next size measure and use up to 120 degrees of 8 M but more small scale application size are not not resigned in size (at least from my last test).

  I had this happen with a product of the vendor who provides the user the ability to create work tables and add indexes via the application. I love the uniform measure for this reason tablespaces.

  HTH - Mark D Powell.

• Re: URGENT: SIZE SINGLE Tablespace before crossing to locally managed

  Hello
  
  Storage space in one of our production databases are managed locally.
  
  Is there a way to know if the ONE SIZE was used when these storage spaces have been converted from the dictionary locally?
  
  Please let me know as soon as possible!
  
  
  Thank you very much!
  
  Kind regards
  
  A

  Hello

  What I need to know if the single size WAS used until the storage spaces have been converted to managed locally.

  Sorry, I did not at first that your Tablespace has been migrated from DMT to LMT. My post was just for newly created LMT.

  Yes, formerly your Tablespace has been a DMT. There is no extended UNIFORM allowance for this kind of Tablespace. UNIFORM and SYSTEM apply only to newly created LMT.

  Increasingly, after having migrated from DMT to LMT, extended allocation rest USER ( DMT ).

  You will have more details on the following Note of My Oracle Support:

  Next Extent Size After Migrating Tablespace from Dictionary to Locally Managed [ID 120061.1] 
  

  For example, if you want to check the size of the scope in the (migrated) Tablespace you must query DBA_EXTENTS (column bytes or blocks) view for all extensions inside the storage space.

  Can be the size of the scope is all the same. It can occur if a default storage has been set on the DMT with INITIAL = NEXT and PCTINCREASE = 0 and/or any other Storage Clause (with INITIAL = NEXT and PCTINCREASE = 0 ) has been set to the /Index of tables created in this table space.

  Hope this helps.
  Best regards
  Jean Valentine

• Migrate from Dictionary Managed Tablespace locally managed - 10g

  Is there a document that indicates best practices to migrate the management measure dictionary managed tablespace to locally managed with automatic segment management space.
  
  I read that we can migrate using the DBMS_SPACE_ADMIN. TABLESPACE_MIGRATE_TO_LOCAL Procedure, but is not very clean because existing data will still use the managed dictionary and new lines inserted will follow the local space management, is this correct?
  
  Can someone please provide comments?
  
  Thank you
  KeV

  Kevin, my personal opinion is that future space management will be much easier for the DBA if the ADMINISTRATOR creates new tablespace by using local management instead converts the tablespaces in place. When the packaged DBMS_SPACE_ADMIN. Procedure TABLESPACE_MIGRATE_TO_LOCAL serves the existing objects are not resized and parameters such pctincrease are still in force. Convert the tablespaces bring their problem of fragmentation of space with them.

  New start. Also if you want to use SAMS you put on when creating tablepsace so new is necessary in this case. ALTER table move and alter index rebuild are an easy way to move most tables/index to the new tablespace. The old exp/imp can be used for objects with long columns.

  I saw the free space fragmentation problems in a tablespace which was not converted-allocation automatic. The use of auto-allocate will considerably reduce the likliness of a problem free space fragmentation, but in some cases, you may still experience the problem.

  HTH - Mark D Powell.

• How to create local notes on MacBook Pro (without synchronization iCloud)

  Hello

  Recently, I have synced the notes on my iPhone and MacBook Pro using iCloud. I was able to create a folder "local notes" on my iPhone but am unable to do it on my Macbook pro. Anyone know how I can create local notes on my laptop which is used to synchronize my phone?

  Thanks in advance!

  Choose the Notes menu > account "on my Mac"

• Creating Local index on an existing partitioned table

  I have an existing table partitioned by list. I'm supposed to create local indexes on this subject.

  I'm using Oracle 11 g.

  I have an existing table partitioned by list. I'm supposed to create local indexes on this subject.

  I'm using Oracle 11 g.

  The skill the MOST IMPORTANT you can learn, is at present, how to find information.

  A search on the SIMPLE web for 'local index of oracle 11g' returns this as the FIRST link

  https://docs.Oracle.com/CD/B28359_01/server.111/b28286/statements_5011.htm

  The "local_partitioned_index" section has all the information you need and it has code example showing you how do it.

• Is it possible to create a new tablespace including datafile will be on a filesystem instead of ASM?

  All our data files are located in the ASM disks (we have only an ASM diskgroup). Now, we run out of space in this ASM diskgroup even though we have a planned expansion of the ASM disk, but it will not happen anytime soon.

  Now, I need to move partitions to be able to resize the files of database considerably. When moving partitions, I need to create a new tablespace where partitions can be moved (in the file system) and then be moved to an original tablespace (in ASM). But since our scores are so large (in GB), I don't have enough space in ASM. I don't have a file system that has enough space to do the above. My question is: is there any problem if I create this tablespace move in this filesystem having in mind that my database uses ASM? It's just temporary until I'm done with that. Unfortunately, I do not have a test bench where I can test this.

  Oracle keeps, realize, or whether or not the data reside on ASM.

• CRS-2630: only cluster administrators are allowed to create local resources

  I have installed and configured a database of 12 c on both nodes of linux and all is well. I also installed the Oracle RDBMS 12.1.01 on the same nodes. Now, when I try and use netca and dbca to create a database or the listener, I get the following errors.

  CRS-2630: only cluster administrators are allowed to create local resources

  I can connect as user GRID and can create resources, but not as a database user. The two users are members of the dba group.

  Any ideas anyone?  Thanks a lot:.

  Hello

  Some update of mote on this strange question; I set up the layer of Oracle GRID 12.1.0.1 in two virtual servers using Oracle Linux Linux rac2node.vbox 2.6.39 - 400.210.2.el5uek. I can do almost all normal operations on the HOUSE of the GRID, but I can't create databases or headphones when I connect to the database home.  The error message speaks of the CRS 2630 error. I can't find any entry on this error.

  Thank you H.

• 12 c: ORA-65049: creating local user or role is not permitted in the CBD$ ROOT

  Last night, I installed Oracle 12 c on OEL 6.4. See Oracle Spatial installation and graph 12 c on OEL 6.4 .

  Today, I tried to create a test user following a syntax which worked for 11g but I got a permission error.

  $ sqlplus sys as sysdba

  SQL * more: Production of the version 12.1.0.1.0 Wed Jun 26 07:08:11 2013

  Copyright (c) 1982, 2013, Oracle.  All rights reserved.

  Enter the password:

  Connected to:

  Database Oracle 12 c Enterprise Edition Release 12.1.0.1.0 - 64 bit Production

  With the options of partitioning, OLAP, advanced analytics and Real Application Testing

  SQL > GIVING DBA, CONNECT, RESOURCE to STEVE IDENTIFIED BY dbl-secret-pwd;

  GRANT DBA, CONNECT, RESOURCE to STEVE IDENTIFIED BY dbl-secret-pwd

  *

  ERROR on line 1:

  ORA-65049: creating local user or role is not permitted in CBD$ ROOT

  Any ideas why I get this error in 12 c?

  Hello

  Its new, so I think that you must first create the PDB (plugable DB), then you can create user as part of the PDB not covered by the CBD (DB container),

• Is documents created locally - a reliable way of reporting on this?

  We need to run a report and return the order records that have been created locally only (not online).
  I was wondering if there is a reliable way to check if the documents have been created on the remote client against the client online?
  for example there are some field which is defined only locally, or in-line function that works differently locally?
  
  The only thing we have had so far has been, for a limited number of orders, the order number for local purchase orders (based on: Expr: 'RowIdToRowIdNum ([Id])') appears to create formatted differently locally online number order (but that is by design?) and it will be reliable?
  
  Or is there another method to see were the orders have been created?

  You can read more about ROW_ID on Supportweb: what is the RowID/ROW_ID, and how is it generated and used? [476256.1 ID]

  It seems that the company prefix is different for local databases, and it seems that it's by design.

  "The company prefix will always be unique to any database (main or local). The server retains its original value, and mobile databases created against this particular server database always receive a new and unique value. »

• Cannot create local adjustments in ACR

  I just reinstalled CS5 in a new computer after a failure of the motherboard and I get this message when I try to use the adjustment brush and the graduated filter.

  "Cannot create local adaptation.  All local adjustment controls are defined to have no effect on the image. »

  System:

  Windows 7 Home Premium

  8 GB RAM DDR3

  Quad processor

  Card-NVIDIA GTX 550 TI

  Any suggestions please.

  Kind regards

  Doug.

  The message reminds you that you must move the sliders to something other than 0 before you can have an effect on your images.

• Cannot create table Manager [vSRM 5.8 + e 3150]

  Hi guys!

  Im going to assess the Vmware Site Recovery Manager product and im doing a lab scenario.

  Is my laboratory there.

  2 sites

  2 e 3150 (1 per location)

  2 Server Vcenter 5.8 (1 per location) windows 2008 r2 (gui Español)

  2 vSRM 5.8 (1 per location)

  E SRA 5.0.0 on the two VCENTERS

  I installed the server VCENTER and vSRM in the same host and I ready creates a new database for vSRM on VIM_SQLEXP.

  Everything works fine but when I go to create Manager table (step 4: "Add array manager and activate the table pairs") I chose ' single array manager "then when asked to specify the setting for this site (for example management IP/hostname, username, password etc.).

  When I perform all the info I press NEXT and after a few minutes, I get this error "SRA command"discoverArrays"does not return a response."

  I expect VSRM log, and I have this:

  -> * Response. *

  --> <? XML version = "1.0" encoding = "UTF-8" standalone = "yes"? >

  " --> < response xmlns =" http://www.VMware.com/SRM/SRA/v2 "> "

  --> < arrays >

  --> < id array = "" >

  --> < model >

  --> < name > VNXe3150 < / name >

  --> < stringId vendor = "AdapterVendor" > EMC < / seller >

  --> < / template >

  --> < ReplicationSoftware >

  --> Replicator < name > VNXe < / name >

  --> < version > 1 < / Version >

  --> < / ReplicationSoftware >

  --> < PeerArrays / >

  --> < / array >

  --> < / table >

  --> < / answer >

  ->

  -> 2014-12-03 08:00:54, 394 [com.emc.sra.SraController]: null

  -> null

  -> com.sun.xml.internal.bind.v2.runtime.MarshallerImpl.write (Unknown Source)

  -> com.sun.xml.internal.bind.v2.runtime.MarshallerImpl.marshal (Unknown Source)

  -> javax.xml.bind.helpers.AbstractMarshallerImpl.marshal (Unknown Source)

  -> com.emc.util.xml.XmlHandler.writeXmlToFile(XmlHandler.java:140)

  -> com.emc.sra.SraController.processCommand(SraController.java:93)

  -> com.emc.sra.vnxe.Main.doStandaloneWork(Main.java:120)

  -> com.emc.sra.vnxe.Main.main(Main.java:33)

  ->

  ->

  2014-12 - 03T 09: 30:54.470 - 03:00 [06324 opID wordy of 'SraCommand' = 53b8c66c] Stopped listening to updates of file 'C:\Users\ADMINI~1.PUE\AppData\Local\Temp\vmware-administrador\sra-status-33-165 '.

  2014-12 - 03T 09: 30:54.470 - 03:00 [06324 opID wordy of 'SraCommand' = 53b8c66c] cancelling SRA command timeout

  2014-12 - 03T 09: 30:54.470 - 03:00 [06324 info 'SraCommand' opID = 53b8c66c] discoverArrays came out with exit code 0

  2014-12 - 03T 09: 30:54.470 - 03:00 [06324 opID 'SraCommand' 53b8c66c = error] discoverArrays came out with no response

  2014-12 - 03T 09: 30:54.470 - ASSIGN 03:00 [06324 opID wordy of 'PropertyProvider' = 53b8c66c] RecordOp: info.progress, dr.storage.StorageManager.createArrayManager19

  2014-12 - 03T 09: 30:54.470 - 03:00 [06324 info 'DrTask' opID = 53b8c66c] task 'dr.storage.StorageManager.createArrayManager19' failed with error: {(dr.storage.fault.CommandResponseMissing)

  -> dynamicType = < unset >

  -> faultCause = (vmodl. NULL in MethodFault),

  -> commandName = "discoverArrays."

  -> msg = ""

  ->}

  2014-12 - 03T 09: 30:54.470 - ASSIGN 03:00 [06324 opID wordy of 'PropertyProvider' = 53b8c66c] RecordOp: info.error, dr.storage.StorageManager.createArrayManager19

  2014-12 - 03T 09: 30:54.470 - 03:00 [06324 info 'DrTask' opID = 53b8c66c] task work "dr.storage.StorageManager.createArrayManager19" finished - new State "error".

  2014-12 - 03T 09: 30:54.470 - ASSIGN 03:00 [06324 opID wordy of 'PropertyProvider' = 53b8c66c] RecordOp: info.state, dr.storage.StorageManager.createArrayManager19

  2014-12 - 03T 09: 30:54.470 - ASSIGN 03:00 [06324 opID wordy of 'PropertyProvider' = 53b8c66c] RecordOp: info.completeTime, dr.storage.StorageManager.createArrayManager19

  2014-12 - 03T 09: 30:54.474 - 03:00 [06324 opID wordy of 'DrTask' = 53b8c66c] has the task default ' com.vmware.vcDr.dr.storage.StorageManager.createArrayManager:task - 72'

  2014-12 - 03T 09: 31:03.794 - 03:00 [06324 verbose "LocalSiteStatus"] free disk space: 2604 Mb

  2014-12 - 03T 09: 31:03.794 - 03:00 [06324 verbose "LocalSiteStatus"] CPU usage: 1%

  2014-12 - 03T 09: 31:03.794 - 03:00 [06324 verbose "LocalSiteStatus"] available memory: 867 MB

  Someone has an idea?

  Thank you!

  Well!

  today I open a live chat with an EMC engineer session, he told me where is the problem!

  basically e line can't stand not VMFS on ISCSI with SRM replicationonly supports this replication with replication Manager (EMC product).

  E with Site Recovery Manager can only replicate with NFS format. The limitation is in the storage device, not MRS.

  Assessing other products, even on the other model that supports native replication block (VNX) or alternative to recovery after disaster as Veeam (to slow) or RecoverPoint.

  Thanks for all your help!

• Ask local users and creates local users

  I am trying to automate the creation of a Local user in ESXi using the Perl SDK.

  I know how to extract a list of users with permissions to the host.

  My $userAccounts = $authorizationMgr-> RetrieveAllPermissions;
  for my {$user (@$userAccounts)}
  If ($user-> eq main $add_user) {}
  # The user exist
  If ($user-> roleId = $add_roleId) {}
  Print "user already exists with correct role, OK\n";
  Exit 0
  } else {}
  Print STDERR "user exists but with wrong roleId.\n";
  Print STDERR "request for role = (". ")" $add_role. (''), got (";"
  {for(@$roleList)}
  If ($user-> roleId eq $_-> roleId) {}
  Print STDERR $_-> name. ») \n » ;
  }
  }

  Exit 1;
  

  }
  }
  }

  But it is possible for an account to be included in the local users and groups, but not have any assigned permissions.

  Does anyone know how query if the local account exist? In vSphere Client when connected directly to a host of local users and groups tab displays this info, I am lookling access in Perl.

  Also I was trying to create a local user account and have no chance

  Code:

  My $accountManager = Vim::get_view (mo_ref = > $service_content-> contact).
  $accountManager-> CreateUser (user = > {id = > 'Inventory2', password = > "aBc!}) ({56hh', description = > 'Inventory2'});

  Output:

  Should HostAccountSpec for the argument of the 'user '. (eval 17) line 100
  VimService::get_arg_string ('HASH (0x1f49c160)', 'user', 'HostAccountSpec') called at (eval 17) line 132
  VimService::build_arg_string ('ARRAY (0x1f085fc0)', 'HASH (0x1f085f40)') called at (eval 17) line 4163
  VimService::CreateUser ('VimService = HASH (0x1f214220)', '_this', 'ManagedObjectReference is HASH (0x1f2db240)', 'user', 'HASH (0x1f49c160)') called at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/VMware/VICommon.pm line 1693
  ViewBase::invoke ('HostLocalAccountManager = HASH (0x1f49c760)', 'CreateUser', ' user', 'HASH (0x1f49c160)') called at (eval 36) line 4
  HostLocalAccountManagerOperations::CreateUser ('HostLocalAccountManager = HASH (0x1f49c760)', 'user', 'HASH (0x1f49c160)') called at vmware_user_add.pl line 151

  I think I made a stupid mistake by calling the method.

  Thanks for any help you can give.

  -Daniel

  To list the users, you must use the managed object userDirectory rather http://pubs.vmware.com/vsphere-51/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.vmware.wssdk.apiref.doc%2Fvim.UserDirectory.html and use RetrieveUserGroups

  Joint a quick example is called listUsers.pl

  VI-admin@vMA51:~ >./listUsers.pl--vesxi51-1--username root of the server
  Enter the password:
  Name: administrator
  Group: 0
  Main: root

  Name: DCUI user
  Group: 0
  Main: dcui

  Name: Account administration VMware VirtualCenter
  Group: 0
  Main: vpxuser

  Name: ESXi user
  Group: 0
  Main: vslauser

  Name: william
  Group: 0
  Principal: william

  For your CreateUser() method, you do not pass in the type of such expect property indicated in the reference on the http://pubs.vmware.com/vsphere-51/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.vmware.wssdk.apiref.doc%2Fvim.host.LocalAccountManager.AccountSpecification.html API, which is a HostAccountSpec of vSphere

  It should be:

  My $userSpec = HostAccountSpec-> new (id-online 'Inventory2', password-online "aBc! 56hh", description =>"Inventory2");

  $accountManager-> CreateUser (user-online $userSpec);

  The QAnywhere vSphere is your friend

  Good luck

• How to create local drives while formatting?

  Interesting question me most and that I have found no information for is - how to manage the facility (recovery) while formatting. I mean when I use recovery DVD Windows XP SP2 for Satellite L100 113, I want to set some options for this installation. Where can I configure the size of the local disks for example? Because the size of the local disk C: is not cofirm with the size of the HARD drive after recovery (about 30 GB difference).

  When executing the product recovery, there will be no interaction or options that will allow you to define partitions or adjustments.
  The only question that a product will be the effect in management of disks, is a recovery will fill the entire disc, so you can't delete an extended partition unless the extended partition is empty. All the logical drives in the extended partition must be deleted before you can delete the extended partition.

  But you can use disk management to configure your disks in and all the information you need is on the links below.

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/313348

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/309000/