Creating a LDAP provider

Similar Questions

• Create the custom provider

  Is it possible to create and save a custom provider for the corporate accounts?

  Because it seems that those available (bbm, twitter, facebook, bbgroups, linkedin and sinaweibo) are provided by Blackberry.

  If this is not the case, what is the concept of recommending to integrate 3rd party accounts?

  Welcome on the support forums.

  You can integrate an application into the hub and share the menu.
  you might take a look at Vincent for a twitter client which has done this successfully.

  Full integration of account is unfortunately not available at this time.

• VCAC6 error: could not retrieve upnSuffixes in AD on Ldap provider

  Hello

  I had sent a new VCAC 6.0.1 environment and I get a lot of error to /var/log/vmware/sso/vmware-sts-idmd.log who speaks of "Impossible to extract the upnSuffixes in Ldap AD Over provider."

  [2014-08-01 16:09, 453 05180a84-03a1-4771-9c80-148a8cbe3c6d demo ERROR] [LdapWithAdMappingsProvider] Failed to retrieve the upnSuffixes in demo.test.local provider Ldap AD Over

  java.security.InvalidParameterException: Null or empty values

  at com.vmware.identity.idm.server.provider.BaseLdapProvider.getStringValues(BaseLdapProvider.java:238)

  at com.vmware.identity.idm.server.provider.ldap.LdapWithAdMappingsProvider.getAlterUpnSuffixes(LdapWithAdMappingsProvider.java:233)

  at com.vmware.identity.idm.server.provider.ldap.LdapWithAdMappingsProvider.getRegisteredUpnSuffixes(LdapWithAdMappingsProvider.java:283)

  at com.vmware.identity.idm.server.provider.BaseLdapProvider.normalizeAliasInPrincipal(BaseLdapProvider.java:363)

  at com.vmware.identity.idm.server.provider.ldap.LdapWithAdMappingsProvider.authenticate(LdapWithAdMappingsProvider.java:304)

  at com.vmware.identity.idm.server.IdentityManager.authenticate(IdentityManager.java:2420)

  at com.vmware.identity.idm.server.IdentityManager.authenticate(IdentityManager.java:7907)

  at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor91.invoke (unknown Source)

  at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke (unknown Source)

  at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke (unknown Source)

  at sun.rmi.server.UnicastServerRef.dispatch (unknown Source)

  to sun.rmi.transport.Transport$ 1.run (unknown Source)

  to sun.rmi.transport.Transport$ 1.run (unknown Source)

  at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged (Native Method)

  at sun.rmi.transport.Transport.serviceCall (unknown Source)

  at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport.handleMessages (unknown Source)

  to sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ ConnectionHandler.run0 (unknown Source)

  to sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ ConnectionHandler.run (unknown Source)

  at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker (unknown Source)

  to java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$ Worker.run (unknown Source)

  at java.lang.Thread.run (unknown Source)

  I don't know is this a normal behavior? I have no doubt but I wanted to know, otherwise what would probably get bad around here...

  Thanks in advance!

  BR,

  MG

  I could solve the problem by changing the Port for LDAP 389 to Global Catalog Port 3268. This error was to come with the child trusted user in the main domain member. Since I changed the GC port, I'm no more have these errors.

  Thank you

  BR,

  MG

• Create the service provider ADF

  Hello

  Is there such a service?  I don't see one on ADR, and that surprised me.

  I am aware that if the base charger file, but there are a few problems with it.

  Thank you

  In OER if you search with type "ADF Service" and search for the string "SupplierService" you should see the service named 'Provider' that has a 'createSupplierVO' operation, is this incorrect? Or is the point that the service is not tagged external, assuming that there is a note of support for that. Service Provider WSDL Service is not outsourced (2000254.1).

  --

  Jani Rautiainen

  Relationship with the developers of Applications in fusion

  https://blogs.Oracle.com/fadevrel/

• (LDAP) provider mapping alias

  Hello
  
  I use content webcenter 11g, my team mapped attributes user the LDAP with accounts and roles at the time and works without any problem.
  
  But know not that I need another mapping of attributes. Is it possible to do the same thing with the alias?
  
  Thank you

  For after this post: Re: notification URM instead of users. role-based is not possible (STANDARD).

• Difficulty accessing Active Directory to work

  Hello world
  
  I need a little help (and not a little, but...) regarding the implementation of Active Directory to authenticate with Microsoft's Login button to the server of the University Complutense of MADRID. I tried for days to try to work, but not having not much of luck to all.
  
  Here are some basic configuration details, I have right now:
  
  OS: Windows Server 2003 as a domain controller Standard
  IIS: 6.0
  
  UCM server information:
  Server name: abc
  Version: 10.1.3.5.0 (090630) (version: 7.2.3.26) Server Configurations
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Product version 10.1.3.5.0 (090630)
  Product build 7.2.3.26
  7.1.4.1 Native version
  Platform win32
  Instance name abc
  Server Menu Label abc
  Content Description abc Server
  Server Port 4444
  UTF8 encoding file
  Page Charset UTF-8
  Host name of the server filter any host this address allows you to filter IP
  Filter Server IP 127.0.0.1
  2012 server process ID
  / ABC / root Web http
  Classpath
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Install directory: c: / ucm/abc /.
  Details of the directory
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Name of the key value
  Install the directory c:/ucm/abc /.
  Shared Library and Resources Directory c:/ucm/abc/shared /.
  State of the data server directory c:/ucm/abc/data /.
  Weblayout directory c:/ucm/abc/weblayout /
  
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  
  Type of database: Oracle
  Database Version: 11.1.0.0.0 - Oracle Database 11 g Release - Production
  Database connection details
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Name of the key value
  Type of database
  Oracle
  
  Version of database
  11.1.0.0.0 - oracle Database 11 g Release - Production
  
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  The HTTP server address: testserver.abc.test
  Mail server: mail
  Configurations of the Internet
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Name of the key value
  Courier mail server
  sysadmin (deleted) Email
  Iis Web server
  The HTTP server address: testserver.abc.test
  / ABC / root Web http
  Use Secure Sockets Layer: FALSE
  
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  
  Search for Engine::DATABASE. FULL-TEXT
  DATABASE: index engine name. FULL-TEXT
  Index: IdcColl2 active
  
  
  The domain Information (not the real estate but close I can do to reveal details):
  Domain: abc.test
  
  Example of my tree of the AD I created the OU and the groups and users:
  
  ABC.test
  -ORACLE
  -AAU
  -ROLES
  -Contributor
  -Comments
  -Developer
  
  I looked through the documentation for the managing_security_10en.pdf document, and I can't seem to figure out the settings to go to the fields as everything does not authenticate at all. I tried to create an LDAP provider and it worked perfectly, but who was using the normal connect button not the button Login from Microsoft.
  
  Currently, I've disabled the LDAPProvider and tried to configure the ADSI section under administration of the filter:
  
  Here are the details, as I entered:
  
  Authorization method: UseTokenGroups
  Filtering user group: true
  Role prefix: OU = ROLES, OU = UCM, OU = ORACLE [1]
  Full employment group names: false
  LDAP attribute:
  CN:dFullName
  mail: dEmail
  Use short names: false
  Master default domain: abc
  Username: abc.test\Administrator
  Password: *.
  
  
  * According to the managing_security_10en.pdf document, I seem to be missing the prefix account box. Does this mean that I have to do an update to the server of the University Complutense of MADRID to get this box?
  
  With all these details entered in the Active Directory Configuration page, and I have already turned on full detailed tracing and userstorage for the active Sections for the server logs. When I try to connect using the Microsoft Login button there are recorded against another server log using the normal login button.
  
  
  
  My apologies for the long reading from the top but I'd appreciate any help that I can and I thank you in advance for any help. A little desperate for any help at all.

  Integration of advertising works so don't panic!

  A few things

  (1) don't worry the account prefix area - this will show only upward if you use security optional accounts and you have UseAccounts = true in your config.cfg
  (2) did you change in Internet Information services to support Active Directory? (IIRC you must configure it to use IWA)
  (3) have you restarted the IIS server
  (4) don't worry too much about the role/group mapping until you can get the authentication works! When the Login MS butoon works then got to the 'My profile' page and you can see if all the attributes have been mapped to AD

  Tim

• Problem creating provider vDC on the way vCloud 5.1 of the Evaluation Guide

  I'm folling the vCloud 5.1 Evaluation Guide.  Well, everything seems to be going, but when I try to create my first provider vDC, I have problems.  At the level of the vCD, I said just that operation exceeded all trying to install the agent on one of my two esx hosts.  Interestingly, it is the host on which I have installed the vShield Manager on.  When I dig down in the plain of vCenter, I see more specific complaints n the event logs for the hosts.

  Apparently, the host must be turned off (for the installation of the agent vCloud, I guess) and this requires a migration of DRS of the vShield Manager vm to my other host.  This migration will fail.  And here is the most relevant information of the event.

  DRS could not generate a recommendation of vMotion for a virtual machine on a host of passage in Maintenance Mode. This incident occurs usually because no other host in the cluster DRS is compatible with the virtual machine. Unless you migrate manually or turn off this virtual machine, the host will not be able to enter into Maintenance Mode.

  Sounds pretty accurate, but I have no idea what could cause problems of "compatibility" with the other guests.  As far as I know, they are the same.  I certainly meant them to be.  The store of data that the virtual machine is on is a store of data shared between two hosts, as far as I can tell.

  Troubleshooting tips would be appreciated.

  the ESXi host is not off... the host is put in maintenance mode.

  In an ideal world, you'd have vCenter/vShield in a different cluster your vCloud deployed VMs.

  To do this, you must ensure you DRS is in fully automatic mode, and vMotion actually works.

  Aside from that, if you create a provider vDC and prepare all hosts, they can all try mode of maintenance on their own.

  It is somewhat a clumsy scenario... Since you cannot move the virtual machines on a host of passage in maintenance mode.

  so, although if failed, if we lend... see if you can prepare the failed host... this time, it can work.

• How do you géreriez the rules for creating LDAP user directory/AD/Exchange?

  I'm obviously new to IOM and have trouble to know what should be the architecture.
  
  We are provisioning of PeopleSoft users and these users will get the accounts created in several systems (LDAP, AD, Exchange,...) When you talk to the owners of these systems, we have identified certain rules they have should be preserved when moving to LDAP.
  
  For example, if a user of a certain type is created in the IOM we would create 3 LDAP accounts. For users normal only 1. They also require that balance us loads on several messaging LDAP stores. I hope I make sense.
  
  People would usually take these rules and their implementation in IOM? Where, in an adapter? Or would you leave the downstream system retain their rules and write a way to call their script of IOM?
  
  This seems to be a lot of effort, the rewriting of their rules of scripts perl or c# and PowerShell (for Exchange) to Java. Also, we are concerned that any time, they have a rule change that we would be forced to make the change by IOM.
  
  Thanks for any help you can give.
  
  Ewan

  Ewan wrote:
  I'm obviously new to IOM and have trouble to know what should be the architecture.

  We are provisioning of PeopleSoft users and these users will get the accounts created in several systems (LDAP, AD, Exchange,...) When you talk to the owners of these systems, we have identified certain rules they have should be preserved when moving to LDAP.

  For example, if a user of a certain type is created in the IOM we would create 3 LDAP accounts. For users normal only 1. They also require that balance us loads on several messaging LDAP stores. I hope I make sense.

  People would usually take these rules and their implementation in IOM? Where, in an adapter?

  Yes, usually. Adapter can call Java. Java can call a centralized service where there are all the rules, if you want a really architecture fancy

  >

  This seems to be a lot of effort, the rewriting of their rules of scripts perl or c# and PowerShell (for Exchange) to Java. Also, we are concerned that any time, they have a rule change that we would be forced to make the change by IOM.

  A place to change the rules, a code base. Seems to be an advantage for me.

• Creating provider

  Hello
  
  This seems to be a combination of business policy & Oracle EBS. Our office of AP is setting out a new policy requiring the buyers to obtain registration documents local suppliers as well as the request to create a new provider. Me being from the company feels that it is not very practical since very often buyers get supplier information local directories and send preliminary quote requests even addressing a contact for this document. The PA Office is also worried and create as many suppliers to clutter up the database of the provider (but I thought that several suppliers database, the better it is). With me to have conviction of 100% the full buying cycle should be routed through Oracle, I seem to be torn between AP not wanting these documents, buyers must create online quote requests and create Oracle requiring the provider first before you send a request for QUOTE.
  
  Would be very grateful if this forum participants can talk about your experiences and enlighten us.
  
  Thank you!

  What you ask is quite common. Almost all of the people of AP are wary of giving access to the screens of provider.

  You can create a new responsibility called XX provider limited.
  And use personalization to grant access to certain areas / blocks if the user is connected to this responsibility.

  Hope that answers your question
  Sandeep Gandhi
  Independent consultant
  513-325-9026.

• UCS Manager 2.2 - LDAP authentication

  Hello

  I have some general questions about authentication LDAP and UCS Manager.

  I hope it's unterstandable...

  We have the following structure:

  • DC = Company.domain.com
    • OU = Domain Administration
      • OU =Administrators
        • UO = Germany
          • CN = User1-SMA
          • CN = SMA-user2
      • OU = Test-UO
        • CN = ucstestuser
        • CN = ucsadmingroup--> Member = SMA-user1, user2-SMA
          

  I added an LDAP provider

  binduser is the SMA-User1

  Base DN = OU = Domain Administration, DC = company, DC = domain, DC = com

  attribute = empty

  filter = sAMAccountName = $userid

  password for User1 SMA

  group permission / recursive enabled.

  I have not add some attributes or map the group. Now I can connect with ucstestuser (read-only), but not with SMA-user1 user2 SMA oder.

  If I add ucstestuser to ucsadmingroup a map of this group, ucstestuser can access and have right to admin, ADM-user1 and user2-adm cannot access (user authentication failed).

  I don't understand, why ucstestuser can access and other users in a different OU not. Unique database name is domain Administration, so that UCSM should see all three users, not?

  Can anyone help? Thank you.

  / Danny

  With UCS remote authentication when a user connects using a temporary account on the FI as a UCS-MyAuthDomain\myusername, which is limited to a total of 32 characters.  If you shorten the name of domain authentication defined in UCSM domain.com to a shorter name as AD, it will allow for the use of a username any longer.

  Note

  For systems using the remote authentication protocol, the authentication domain name is considered to be part of the user name and the limit of 32 characters for usernames created locally. Because Cisco UCS inserts 5-character formatting, the authentication will fail if the name and the user character domain name combined total is greater than 27.

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/unified_computing/UCS/SW/GUI/config/Guide/2-2/b_UCSM_GUI_Configuration_Guide_2_2/b_UCSM_GUI_Configuration_Guide_2_1_chapter_01000.html

• LDAP test page is a hidden page Apex 4.2?

  Hello
  my understanding is that, until a certain version of the Summit there was a test page link LDAP provided somewhere in the page "Edit authentication scheme" when LDAP authentication was selected.

  In 4.2.5 and above all I do not see this link anywhere, but I can still reach the LDAP test tool on page 4000:3890 if I change the URL manually.

  Is my understanding correct or am I missing something?

  Thank you

  Flavio

  Yes, it has been removed in version 4.x - currently, the question was followed through Bug 15929196 - LDAP TEST TOOL NOT AVAILABLE for APEX 4.2

  News for Apex 5 is:

  To create/edit page (4000:4495) authentication scheme now contains the button "Test ". " LDAP connection" which appears under certain conditions when the authentication scheme is "LDAP Directory". Clicking this button opens the page to Test LDAP (4000:3890) in a new window, where the connection can be tested. This page also allows to the to change the LDAP settings. The "Apply Changes" button can be used to write settings back to the authentication Scheme page.

  
  

  Bug also, mentions in a PL/SQL block as possible workaround:

  Start
  If apex_ldap.authenticate)
  p_username-online "Smith."
  p_password-online "John."
  p_search_base => ' or = people, dc = example, dc = com ",
  p_host-online "localhost."
  p_port-online 389,
  p_use_ssl-online "n")
  then
  sys.dbms_output.put_line ('Authenticated');
  on the other
  sys.dbms_output.put_line ("authentication failed");
  end if;
  end;

• application role custom (added ldap group) still no connection possible

  Hello
  I created a BIConsumer_USA (using Oracle Enterprise Manager) role for consumers to report BI from the United States, who should have access only
  dashboards US (consisting of BI publisher reports). I added this new application role BIConsumer_USA
  the application role existing BIConsumer (so the permissions are defined) as well as the usersUSA of the LDAP group.
  However, even after doing all this. I can not connect with users who belong to this group and who have the role of BI_Consumer_USA.
  Why is this?

  Given that the LDAP protocol is an IBM Tivoli we should able to use OpenLDAP instead of OVD LDAP provider in the logic of the Web.

• Connection to the Service of PAPI process when you use LDAP

  We have Oracle BPM 10.3 put in place with the help of LDAP as a directory for the participants. To connect to the service of process PAPI we want to use a system id which is a user but not put in place in LDAP. How can we do this? Y at - it a special group of role or security necessary for this user, i.e. should the privileges of the user Admin process?

  Hello
  Yes, this will definitely need a password, which is the same as the password that you will use to connect to the system (workspace BPM or the external application that makes calls PAPI).

  The way we have implemented is: we have a J2EE application (app A) external which makes use of calls papi, deployed on weblogic. The BPM engine is also deployed on the same weblogic domain. The BPM application can then be configured to be used in mode Single Sign On and deployed. In such a scenario when a user types in the url for the workspace BPM, the login page for app has will be shown.

  The Protocol LDAP that you use to configure the BPM directory also lets you create a security provider in the field of the safety of the weblogic (using the weblogic console). This will ensure that any application (in this case Soft A) deployed on weblogic will use this users/groups to this LDAP for authentication purpose. This completes the installation, and we need A app and BPM application both authenticating to the same LDAP protocol and application of BPM is set up in SSO mode.

  When the user comes to the login page of the appA, the corresponding servlet can store the password in the session and then to the app worklist page (if you wish). BPM login page not coming, since BPM can authenticate the user based on the login in the appA. Later (let us say that during the execution of the external task; when the appA servlet is called from BPM), you can use the password stored in the session to create the object papisession for the logged in user.

  I recently started a blog, where I have an example of PAPI (as it is one of the issues preferred users BPM). You can check

  http://satinderblogs.blogspot.com/2009_11_01_archive.html

  HTH
  Simart

• mapping of LDAP

  Hello
  I have to integrate Complutense University of Madrid with a ldap user repository. As a general question, each user must be mapped or can I "omit" one / some (I have a user that I want to keep all the features but I don't want to have access to the portal, so I'm thinknig of mapping simply do not hollow ldap). Is this possible or all Content Server users must have a sign with in the ldap repository, otherwise, he wants to work?
  We are talnking on a 10gR 3 content on an AIX5 server. On the repository of the user, I know a lot of things right now, but it was just a general question.
  
  Kind regards
  Maria

  HI Maria,

  As a general rule, you don't really need to map users to the University Complutense of MADRID to LDAP users. All you have to do is map (accounts and roles if you use the option accounts.)
  You must create users at all at the Complutense University of MADRID. You can configure the content server to authenticate a user directly from LDAP.
  In addition, a good thing is that AAU will allow each LDAP user who is trying to connect to the content server. Only the LDAP users that meet certain criteria, (i.e. LDAP roles that correspond to the roles of the AAU are affected) will be authorized successfully.

  All you have to do is to configure an LDAP provider. (You can even have more than one LDAP provider, so you can connect to more than one LDAP source)

  Kind regards
  Elvis

  Published by: Spada E on April 14, 2009 02:24

• UCCX cuic: Failed to create the dashboard

  Hi all

  My user is to have a role as administrator & Reporting in UCCX, as well as the role of Dashboard Designer in cuic. However, the user is unable to create the new dashboard / subdirectories (all grayed out option). I'm under 10.5.

  Is there a required additional configuration?

  Thank you!

  -JT-

  JT,

  See the information below regarding the creation of dashboards:

  1. no default reports user doesn't have permissions to create dashboards directly under the parent directory even if they provided the role of Dashboard Designer.

  2. the Super user/administrator can create subcategories and provide writing and the declaration of the user execute permissions so that they can create dashboards in this subcategory.

  The same is documented in the section create subcategory of the document:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact _...

  Therefore, connect in cuic as the Super user and create subcategories for the users of necessary reports and provide write/execute permissions after which they will be able to see the dashboard and work under this

  Run below command from primary UCCX CLI to discover the Super User CUIC

  Run sql select * from mmca_propertydef where propertyname ='OAMP. Superuser"

  In this case, you are not able to remember the password for the user that you get after running the above command, you can still set a new Super user and the password by using the UCCX primary CLI commands below:

  reset_application_ui_administrator_name utils

  reset_application_ui_administrator_password utils

  Concerning

  Deepak

  -Rate of post - useful