Crossed, VPN and NAT

Similar Questions

• client ipSec VPN and NAT on the router Cisco = FAIL

  I have a Cisco 3825 router that I have set up for a Cisco VPN ipSec client.  The same router is NAT.

  ipSec logs, but can not reach the internal network unless NAT is disabled on the inside interface.  But I need both at the same time.

  Suggestions?

  crypto ISAKMP policy 3

  BA 3des

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  !

  ISAKMP crypto client configuration group myclient

  key password!

  DNS 1.1.1.1

  Domain name

  pool myVPN

  ACL 111

  !

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac RIGHT

  !

  Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 10

  Set transform-set RIGHT

  market arriere-route

  !

  !
  list of card crypto clientmap client VPN - AAA authentication
  card crypto clientmap AAA - VPN isakmp authorization list
  client configuration address map clientmap crypto answer
  10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map clientmap Dynamics dynmap
  !

  interface Loopback0
  IP 10.88.0.1 255.255.255.0
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet0/0
  / / DESC it's external interface

  IP 192.168.168.5 255.255.255.0
  NAT outside IP
  IP virtual-reassembly
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  media type rj45
  clientmap card crypto
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet0/1

  / / DESC it comes from inside interface
  10.0.1.10 IP address 255.255.255.0
  IP nat inside<=================ipSec client="" connects,="" but="" cannot="" reach="" interior="" network="" unless="" this="" is="">
  IP virtual-reassembly
  the route cache same-interface IP
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  media type rj45

  !

  IP local pool myVPN 10.88.0.2 10.88.0.10

  p route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.168.1
  IP route 10.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.0.1.4
  !

  IP nat inside source list 1 interface GigabitEthernet0/0 overload
  !
  access-list 1 permit 10.0.0.0 0.0.255.255
  access-list 111 allow ip 10.0.0.0 0.0.255.255 10.88.0.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 111 allow ip 10.88.0.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.0.255.255

  Hello

  I think that you need to configure the ACL default PAT so there first statemts 'decline' for traffic that is NOT supposed to be coordinated between the local network and VPN pool

  For example, to do this kind of configuration, ACL and NAT

  Note access-list 100 NAT0 customer VPN
  

  access-list 100 deny ip 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.255 10.88.0.0 0.0.0.255
  

  Note access-list 100 default PAT for Internet traffic
  

  access-list 100 permit ip 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.255 ay

  overload of IP nat inside source list 100 interface GigabitEthernet0/0

  
  EDIT: seem to actually you could have more than 10 networks behind the router

  Then you could modify the ACL on this

  Note access-list 100 NAT0 customer VPN
  

  access-list 100 deny ip 10.0.1.0 0.0.255.255 10.88.0.0 0.0.0.255
  

  Note access-list 100 default PAT for Internet traffic
  

  access-list 100 permit ip 10.0.1.0 0.0.255.255 ay

  Don't forget to mark the answers correct/replys and/or useful answers to rate

  -Jouni

• Split of static traffic between the VPN and NAT

  Hi all

  We have a VPN from Site to Site that secures all traffic to and from 10.160.8.0/24 to/from 10.0.0.0/8.  It's for everything - including Internet traffic.  However, there is one exception (of course)...

  The part that I can't make it work is if traffic comes from the VPN (10.0.0.0/8) of 10.160.8.5 (on 80 or 443), then the return traffic must go back through the VPN.  BUT, if traffic 80 or 443 comes from anywhere else (Internet via X.X.X.X which translates to 10.160.8.5), so there need to be translated réécrirait Internet via Gig2.

  I have the following Setup (tried to have just the neccessarry lines)...

  interface GigabitEthernet2

  address IP Y.Y.Y.Y 255.255.255.0! the X.X.X.X and Y.Y.Y.Y are in the same subnet

  address IP X.X.X.X 255.255.255.0 secondary

  NAT outside IP

  card crypto ipsec-map-S2S

  interface GigabitEthernet4.2020

  Description 2020

  encapsulation dot1Q 2020

  IP 10.160.8.1 255.255.255.0

  IP nat inside

  IP virtual-reassembly

  IP nat inside source list interface NAT-output GigabitEthernet2 overload

  IP nat inside source static tcp 10.160.8.5 80 80 X.X.X.X map route No. - NAT extensible

  IP nat inside source static tcp 10.160.8.5 443 443 X.X.X.X map route No. - NAT extensible

  NAT-outgoing extended IP access list

  refuse 10.160.8.5 tcp host 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 eq www

  refuse 10.160.8.5 tcp host 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 eq 443

  permit tcp host 10.160.8.5 all eq www

  permit tcp host 10.160.8.5 any eq 443

  No. - NAT extended IP access list

  refuse 10.160.8.5 tcp host 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 eq www

  refuse 10.160.8.5 tcp host 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 eq 443

  allow an ip

  route No. - NAT allowed 10 map

  corresponds to the IP no. - NAT

  With the above configuration, we can get to the Internet 10.160.8.5, but cannot cross it over the VPN tunnel (from 10.200.0.0/16).  If I remove the two commands «ip nat inside source static...» ', then the opposite that happens - I can get then to 10.160.8.5 it VPN tunnel but I now can't get to it from the Internet.

  How can I get both?  It seems that when I hit the first NAT instruction (overload Gig2) that 'decline' in the list of ACL-NAT-outgoing punts me out of this statement of NAT.  It can process the following statement of NAT (one of the 'ip nat inside source static... ") but does not seem to"deny"it in the NON - NAT ACL me punt out of this statement of NAT.  That's my theory anyway (maybe something is happening?)

  If this work like that or I understand something correctly?  It's on a router Cisco's Cloud Services (CSR 1000v).

  Thank you!

  Your netmask is bad for your 10.0.0.0/8. I worry not about the port/protocol or since that can screw you up. A better way to do it would be to deny all IP vpn traffic.

  NAT-outgoing extended IP access list

  deny ip 10.160.8.0 0.0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255

  ...

  No. - NAT extended IP access list

  deny ip 10.160.8.0 0.0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255

  allow an ip

  Doc:

  Router to router IPSec with NAT and Cisco Secure VPN Client overload

  Thank you

  Brendan

• Tunnel VPN and NAT

  Hello. I'm creating a tunnel VPN IPSec LAN - to - LAN of my ASA5510 to another network but met an obstacle bit. My counterpart on the other side has informed me that he already has a VPN tunnel to another company that has the same IP range as my network(10.100.16.0 /24) and can not create the tunnel.

  I was wondering is it possible to use NAT on the VPN tunnel so that traffic that goes from my network over the VPN tunnel gets translated and my counterpart on the other side sees this reflects the range of IP addresses?

  Thanks in advance for any help.

  Hello

  Yes, you can use the same address you already use for internet access.

  Just update your list of access crypto to reflect the new address and to ensure that the third party did the same.

  Jon

• ASA5505 SSL AnyConnect VPN and NAT Reverse Path failure

  I worked on it for a while and just have not found a solution yet.

  I have a Cisco ASA5505 Setup at home and I try to use the AnyConnect VPN client to it.  I followed the example of ASA 8.x split Tunnel but still miss me something.

  My home network is 10.170.x.x and I install the VPN address to 10.170.13.x pool I have a Windows workstation running at 10.170.0.6, printers 10.170.0.20 and 21 and inside the router itself is 10.170.0.1

  I can connect from the outside and am assigned an IP address of 10.170.13.10, but when I try to access network resources via ICMP or open a web page, the newspaper of the ASDM shows a bunch of this:

  5. January 27, 2010 | 10: 33:37 | 305013 | 10.170.255.255 | 137. Asymmetrical NAT rules matched for flows forward and backward; Connection for udp src outside:10.170.13.10/137 dst inside:10.170.255.255/137 refused due to path failure reverse that of NAT
  5. January 27, 2010 | 10: 33:36 | 305013 | 10.170.255.255 | 137. Asymmetrical NAT rules matched for flows forward and backward; Connection for udp src outside:10.170.13.10/137 dst inside:10.170.255.255/137 refused due to path failure reverse that of NAT
  5. January 27, 2010 | 10: 33: 35 | 305013 | 10.170.255.255 | 137. Asymmetrical NAT rules matched for flows forward and backward; Connection for udp src outside:10.170.13.10/137 dst inside:10.170.255.255/137 refused due to path failure reverse that of NAT
  5. January 27, 2010 | 10: 33:34 | 305013 | 10.170.0.6 | Asymmetrical NAT rules matched for flows forward and backward; Connection for icmp src, dst outside: 10.170.13.10 inside: 10.170.0.6 (type 8, code 0) rejected due to the failure of reverse path of NAT
  5. January 27, 2010 | 10:33:30 | 305013 | 10.170.255.255 | 137. Asymmetrical NAT rules matched for flows forward and backward; Connection for udp src outside:10.170.13.10/137 dst inside:10.170.255.255/137 refused due to path failure reverse that of NAT
  5. January 27, 2010 | 10: 33:29 | 305013 | 10.170.255.255 | 137. Asymmetrical NAT rules matched for flows forward and backward; Connection for udp src outside:10.170.13.10/137 dst inside:10.170.255.255/137 refused due to path failure reverse that of NAT
  5. January 27, 2010 | 10: 33:28 | 305013 | 10.170.255.255 | 137. Asymmetrical NAT rules matched for flows forward and backward; Connection for udp src outside:10.170.13.10/137 dst inside:10.170.255.255/137 refused due to path failure reverse that of NAT
  5. January 27, 2010 | 10: 33:28 | 305013 | 10.170.0.6 | Asymmetrical NAT rules matched for flows forward and backward; Connection for icmp src, dst outside: 10.170.13.10 inside: 10.170.0.6 (type 8, code 0) rejected due to the failure of reverse path of NAT
  5. January 27, 2010 | 10:33:23 | 305013 | 10.170.0.6 | Asymmetrical NAT rules matched for flows forward and backward; Connection for icmp src, dst outside: 10.170.13.10 inside: 10.170.0.6 (type 8, code 0) rejected due to the failure of reverse path of NAT
  5. January 27, 2010 | 10:33:17 | 305013 | 10.170.0.6 | Asymmetrical NAT rules matched for flows forward and backward; Connection for icmp src, dst outside: 10.170.13.10 inside: 10.170.0.6 (type 8, code 0) rejected due to the failure of reverse path of NAT
  5. January 27, 2010 | 10: 33: 13 | 305013 | 10.170.0.6 | Asymmetrical NAT rules matched for flows forward and backward; Connection for icmp src, dst outside: 10.170.13.10 inside: 10.170.0.6 (type 8, code 0) rejected due to the failure of reverse path of NAT
  5. January 27, 2010 | 10:33:07 | 305013 | 10.170.0.6 | Asymmetrical NAT rules matched for flows forward and backward; Connection for icmp src, dst outside: 10.170.13.10 inside: 10.170.0.6 (type 8, code 0) rejected due to the failure of reverse path of NAT

  I tried several things with NAT, but were not able to go beyond that.  Does anyone mind looking at my config running and help me with this?  Thanks a bunch!

  -Tim

  Couple to check points.

  name 10.17.13.0 UFP-VPN-pool looks like it should be the name 10.170.13.0 UFP-VPN-pool

  inside_nat0_outbound to access extended list ip allow list zero 255.255.0.0 255.255.255.0 UFP-VPN-pool

  Looks like that one

  inside_nat0_outbound to list extended ip access list zero UFP-VPN-pool 255.255.255.0 255.255.255.0 allow

• Remote access ASA, VPN and NAT

  Hello

  I try to get access to remote VPN work using a Cisco VPN client and ASA with no split tunneling. The VPN works a little, I can access devices inside when I connect, but I can't access the Internet. I don't see any errors in the log ASA except these:

  1 Jul 04:59:15 % ASA-3-305006 gatekeeper: failed to create translation portmap for udp src outside:192.168.47.200/137 dst outside:192.168.47.255/137
  1 Jul 04:59:15 % ASA-3-305006 gatekeeper: failed to create translation portmap for udp src outside:192.168.47.200/54918 dst outsidexx.xxx.xxx.xxx/53

  There is only one address public IP that is assigned to the external interface of DHCP. The Interior is 192.168.1.0/24 network which is PAT'ed to the external interface and the VPN network is 192.168.47.X.

  I think my problem is that the net.47 is not NAT'ed out properly and I don't know how to put in place exactly. I can't understand how this is supposed to work since the net VPN technically provenance from the outside already.

  Here are all the relevant config:

  list of vpn access extended permits all ip 192.168.47.0 255.255.255.0
  Within 1500 MTU
  Outside 1500 MTU
  IP local pool vpnpool 192.168.47.200 - 192.168.47.220 mask 255.255.255.0
  IP verify reverse path to the outside interface
  IP audit info alarm drop action
  IP audit attack alarm drop action
  ICMP unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
  ICMP allow all outside
  Global interface (2 inside)
  Global 1 interface (outside)
  NAT (inside) 0-list of access vpn
  NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
  NAT (outside) 2 192.168.47.0 255.255.255.0 outside
  static (inside, outside) tcp 3074 XBOX360 3074 netmask 255.255.255.255 interface
  static (inside, outside) udp 3074 XBOX360 3074 netmask 255.255.255.255 interface
  public static (inside, outside) udp interface 88 88 XBOX360 netmask 255.255.255.255
  public static tcp (indoor, outdoor) https someids netmask 255.255.255.255 https interface

  I can post more of the configuration if necessary.

  Change ' nat (outside) 2 192.168.47.0 255.255.255.0 apart ' "NAT (2-list of vpn access outdoors outside)" gives these:

  1 Jul 06:18:35 % gatekeeper ASA-3-305005: no group of translation not found for udp src outside:192.168.47.200/56003 dst outside:66.174.95.44/53

  So, how I do right NAT VPN traffic so it can access the Internet?

  A few things that needs to be changed:

  (1) NAT exemption what ACL must be modified to be more specific while the traffic between the internal subnets and subnet pool vpn is not coordinated. NAT exemption takes precedence over all other statements of NAT, so your internet traffic from the vpn does not work.

  This ACL:

  list of vpn access extended permits all ip 192.168.47.0 255.255.255.0

  Should be changed to:

  extensive list of access vpn ip 192.168.47.0 255.255.255.0 allow

  (2) you don't need statement "overall (inside) 2. Here's what to be configured:

  no nat (outside) 2 192.168.47.0 255.255.255.0 outside

  no global interface (2 inside)

  NAT (outside) 1 192.168.47.0 255.255.255.0

  (3) and finally, you must activate the following allow traffic back on the external interface:

  permit same-security-traffic intra-interface

  And don't forget to clear xlate after the changes described above and connect to your VPN.

  Hope that helps.

• Problem with the VPN and NAT configuration

  Hi all

  I have a VPN tunnel and NATing participates at the remote site.

  I have the VPN tunnel from the absolutely perfect traffic from users, but I am struggling to manage the device via SNMP through the VPN tunnel.

  Remote subnet is 192.168.10.0/24

  That subnet gets PAT'd to 192.168.4.254/32

  The subnet to HQ is 10.0.16.0/24

  IP address of the ASA remote is 192.168.10.10

  Of course, as this subnet is NAT would have I created a static NAT so that the 192.168.4.253 translates 192.168.10.10.

  I can see that packets destined to the 192.168.4.253 device address comes to the end of the tunnel as long as the number of packets decrypted increases when you run a continuous ping to the device.

  However, the unit will not return these packages. The wristwatch that 0 packets encrypted.

  Please let me know if you need more information, or the output of the configuration complete.

  When I start a capture on the ASA remote, I don't see ICMP packets to reach the ASA REAL ip (192.168.10.10). Maybe I set my NAT evil?

  Also, there is no Interface inside, only an Interface outside. And the default route points to the next router ISP Hop on the external Interface.

  Hope that all of the senses.

  Thank you

  Mario Rosa

  No, unfortunately you can not NAT the ASA outside the IP of the interface itself.

• Cisco ASA Site to Site VPN IPSEC and NAT question

  Hi people,

  I have a question about the two Site to Site VPN IPSEC and NAT. basically what I want to achieve is to do the following:

  ASA2 is at HQ and ASA1 is a remote site. I have no problem setting a static static is a Site to IPSEC VPN between sites. Guests residing in 10.1.0.0/16 are able to communicate with hosts in 192.168.1.0/24, but what I want is to configure the NAT with IPSEC VPN for this host to 10.1.0.0/16 will communicate with hosts in 192.168.1.0/24 with translated addresses

  Just an example:

  N2 host (10.1.0.1/16) contacted N1 192.168.1.5 with destination host say 10.23.1.5 No 192.168.1.5 (notice the last byte is the same in the present case,.5)

  The translation still for the rest of the communication (host pings ip destination host 10.23.1.6 N3 N2 not 192.168.1.6 new last byte is the same)

  It sounds a bit confusing to me, but I've seen this type of configuration before when I worked for the supplier of managed services where we have given our customers (Ipsec Site to Site VPN with NAT, don't know how it was setup)

  Basically we contact the customer via site-to-site VPN hosts but their real address were hidden and we used as translated address more high 10.23.1.0/24 instead of (real) 192.168.1.0/24, last byte must be the same.

  Grateful if someone can shed some light on this subject.

  Hello

  OK so went with the old format of NAT configuration

  It seems to me that you could do the following:

  • Configure the ASA1 with static NAT strategy
    • access-list L2LVPN-POLICYNAT allowed ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0
    • public static 10.23.1.0 (inside, outside) access-list L2LVPN-POLICYNAT
  • Because the above is a static NAT of the policy, this means that the translation will be made only when the destination network is 10.1.0.0/16
  • If you have for example a PAT basic configuration to inside-> external traffic, the above NAT configuration and the custom of the actual configuration of PAT interfere with eachother
  • ASA2 side, you can normally configure NAT0 / NAT Exemption for the 10.1.0.0/16 network
    • Note of the INTERIOR-SHEEP access-list SHEEP L2LVPN
    • the permitted INSIDE SHEEP 10.1.0.0 ip access list 255.255.0.0 10.23.1.0 255.255.255.0
    • NAT (inside) 0-list of access to the INTERIOR-SHEEP
  • You will need to consider that your access-list defining the VPN encrypted L2L traffic must reflect the new NAT network
    • ASA1: allowed to access-list L2LVPN-ENCRYPTIONDOMAIN ip 10.23.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0
    • ASA2: list L2LVPN-ENCRYPTIONDOMAIN allowed ip 10.1.0.0 access 255.255.0.0 10.23.1.0 255.255.255.0

  I could test this configuration to work tomorrow but I would like to know if it works.

  Please rate if this was helpful

  -Jouni

• VPN IPSec with no. - Nat and Nat - No.

  On a 6.3 (5) PIX 515 that I currently have an IPSec VPN configured with no. - nat, using all public IPs internally and on the remote control. Can I add two hosts to the field of encryption that have private IP addresses and NAT to the same public IP in the address card Crypto? What commands would be involved in this?

  Current config:

  -------

  ipsectraffic_boston list of allowed access host ip host PublicIP11 PublicIP1

  ipsectraffic_boston list of allowed access host ip host PublicIP22 PublicIP2

  outside2_outbound_nat0_acl list of allowed access host ip host PublicIP PublicIP

  card crypto mymap 305 correspondence address ipsectraffic_boston
  mymap 305 peer IPAdd crypto card game.
  mymap 305 transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA crypto card game
  life card crypto mymap 305 set security-association seconds 86400 4608000 kilobytes

  ---------

  I would add two IP private to the 'ipsectraffic_boston access-list' and have NAT to a public IP address, as the remote site asks that I don't use the private IP. This would save the effort to add a public IP address to my internal host.

  Thank you

  Dan

  Hello

  If for example you have an internal host 192.168.1.1 and you want NAT public IP 200.1.1.1 it address

  You can make a static NAT:

  (in, out) static 200.1.1.1 192.168.1.1

  And include the 200.1.1.1 in crypto ACL.

  Federico.

• The ASA with crossed VPN Port forwarding

  Hello

  I worked on a question for a while and I have managed to track down the issue, but I don't know how to solve the problem.

  I have an ASA 5505 8.4 (7) running with a tunnel for incoming remote users anyconnect vpn. I also want to configure incoming Web server port forwarding.

  The question seems to be traversed rule which stops incoming port forwarding:

  NAT (outside, outside) NETWORK_OBJ_172.16.1.0_28 interface description dynamic source hairpin to natting users vpn on the external interface

  When I disable the port forwarding will work perfectly (according to tracer packet that is).

  I have attached the config to this post. I would appreciate any idea how to get the through VPN and the transfer to the incoming port working.

  The config has been condensed to remove unneed config.

  Thank you

  Hello

  What is the configuration commands, you use to put in place the static PAT (Port Forward)?

  The problem is most likely order of the NAT configurations such as configuring NAT above in the upper part of the NAT configurations.

  Configuring static PAT, that you could use to make it work would be

  the SERVER object network

  host

  service object WWW

  tcp source eq www service

  NAT (server, on the outside) of the interface to the static SERVER 1 source WWW WWW service

  The above assumes the source for the host interface is "Server" and the service that you want to PAT static TCP/80.

  Note that we add the number '1' in the 'nat' command. This will add at the top. The same should be done for any other static PAT you configure you want for these VPN Clients.

  Hope this helps

  -Jouni

• remote VPN and vpn site to site vpn remote users unable to access the local network

  As per below config remote vpn and vpn site to site vpn remote users unable to access the local network please suggest me a required config

  The local 192.168.215.4 not able ping server IP this server connectivity remote vpn works fine but not able to ping to the local network vpn users.

  ASA Version 8.2 (2)
  !
  host name
  domain kunchevrolet
  activate r8xwsBuKsSP7kABz encrypted password
  r8xwsBuKsSP7kABz encrypted passwd
  names of
  !
  interface Ethernet0/0
  nameif outside
  security-level 0
  PPPoE client vpdn group dataone
  IP address pppoe
  !
  interface Ethernet0/1
  nameif inside
  security-level 50
  IP 192.168.215.2 255.255.255.0
  !
  interface Ethernet0/2
  nameif Internet
  security-level 0
  IP address dhcp setroute
  !
  interface Ethernet0/3
  Shutdown
  No nameif
  no level of security
  no ip address
  !
  interface Management0/0
  Shutdown
  No nameif
  no level of security
  no ip address
  management only
  !
  passive FTP mode
  clock timezone IST 5 30
  DNS server-group DefaultDNS
  domain kunchevrolet
  permit same-security-traffic intra-interface
  object-group network GM-DC-VPN-Gateway
  object-group, net-LAN
  access extensive list ip 192.168.215.0 sptnl allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0
  192.168.215.0 IP Access-list extended sheep 255.255.255.0 allow 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0
  tunnel of splitting allowed access list standard 192.168.215.0 255.255.255.0
  pager lines 24
  Enable logging
  asdm of logging of information
  Outside 1500 MTU
  Within 1500 MTU
  MTU 1500 Internet
  IP local pool VPN_Users 192.168.2.1 - 192.168.2.250 mask 255.255.255.0
  ICMP unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
  enable ASDM history
  ARP timeout 14400
  NAT-control
  Global 1 interface (outside)
  NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
  Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 59.90.214.1 1
  Timeout xlate 03:00
  Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
  Sunrpc timeout 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 mgcp from 01:00 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
  Sip timeout 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 prompt Protocol sip-0: 03:00 sip - disconnect 0:02:00
  Timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute
  timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00
  dynamic-access-policy-registration DfltAccessPolicy
  the ssh LOCAL console AAA authentication
  AAA authentication LOCAL telnet console
  AAA authentication http LOCAL console
  AAA authentication enable LOCAL console
  LOCAL AAA authentication serial console
  Enable http server
  x.x.x.x 255.255.255.252 out http
  http 192.168.215.0 255.255.255.252 inside
  http 192.168.215.0 255.255.255.0 inside
  No snmp server location
  No snmp Server contact
  Server enable SNMP traps snmp authentication linkup, linkdown cold start
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac RIGHT
  life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800
  Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life - safety 4608000 association
  Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 65500 transform-set RIGHT
  card crypto 10 VPN ipsec-isakmp dynamic dynmap
  card crypto VPN outside interface
  card crypto 10 ASA-01 set peer 221.135.138.130
  card crypto 10 ASA - 01 the transform-set RIGHT value
  crypto ISAKMP allow outside
  crypto ISAKMP policy 10
  preshared authentication
  3des encryption
  sha hash
  Group 2
  life 86400
  crypto ISAKMP policy 65535
  preshared authentication
  the Encryption
  sha hash
  Group 2
  lifetime 28800
  Telnet 192.168.215.0 255.255.255.0 inside
  Telnet timeout 5
  SSH 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 outdoors
  SSH timeout 5
  Console timeout 0
  management-access inside
  VPDN group dataone request dialout pppoe
  VPDN group dataone localname bb4027654187_scdrid
  VPDN group dataone ppp authentication chap
  VPDN username bb4027654187_scdrid password * local store
  interface for identifying DHCP-client Internet customer
  dhcpd dns 218.248.255.141 218.248.245.1
  !
  dhcpd address 192.168.215.11 - 192.168.215.254 inside
  dhcpd allow inside
  !
  a basic threat threat detection
  Statistics-list of access threat detection
  no statistical threat detection tcp-interception
  Des-sha1 encryption SSL
  WebVPN
  allow outside
  tunnel-group-list activate
  internal kun group policy
  kun group policy attributes
  VPN - connections 8
  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec
  Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
  Split-tunnel-network-list value split tunnel
  kunchevrolet value by default-field
  test P4ttSyrm33SV8TYp encrypted password username
  username kunauto password bSHrKTGl8PUbvus / encrypted privilege 15
  username kunauto attributes
  Strategy Group-VPN-kun
  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec
  tunnel-group vpngroup type remote access
  tunnel-group vpngroup General attributes
  address pool VPN_Users
  Group Policy - by default-kun
  tunnel-group vpngroup webvpn-attributes
  the vpngroup group alias activation
  vpngroup group tunnel ipsec-attributes
  pre-shared key *.
  type tunnel-group test remote access
  tunnel-group x.x.x.x type ipsec-l2l
  tunnel-group ipsec-attributes x.x.x.x
  pre-shared key *.
  !
  class-map inspection_default
  match default-inspection-traffic
  !
  !
  type of policy-card inspect dns preset_dns_map
  parameters
  maximum message length automatic of customer
  message-length maximum 512
  Policy-map global_policy
  class inspection_default
  inspect the preset_dns_map dns
  inspect the ftp
  inspect h323 h225
  inspect the h323 ras
  Review the ip options
  inspect the netbios
  inspect the rsh
  inspect the rtsp
  inspect the skinny
  inspect esmtp
  inspect sqlnet
  inspect sunrpc
  inspect the tftp
  inspect the sip
  inspect xdmcp
  inspect the icmp
  !
  global service-policy global_policy
  context of prompt hostname
  call-home
  Profile of CiscoTAC-1
  no active account
  http https://tools.cisco.com/its/service/oddce/services/DDCEService destination address
  email address of destination [email protected] / * /
  destination-mode http transport
  Subscribe to alert-group diagnosis
  Subscribe to alert-group environment
  Subscribe to alert-group monthly periodic inventory
  monthly periodicals to subscribe to alert-group configuration
  daily periodic subscribe to alert-group telemetry
  Cryptochecksum:0d2497e1280e41ab3875e77c6b184cf8
  : end
  kunauto #.

  Hello

  Looking at the configuration, there is an access list this nat exemption: -.

  192.168.215.0 IP Access-list extended sheep 255.255.255.0 allow 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0

  But it is not applied in the States of nat.

  Send the following command to the nat exemption to apply: -.

  NAT (inside) 0 access-list sheep

  Kind regards

  Dinesh Moudgil

  P.S. Please mark this message as 'Responded' If you find this information useful so that it brings goodness to other users of the community

• Remote EZVPN and nat

  Hello

  I have several router works as ezvpn remote (network extension mode) and they work perfectly.

  I need to configure a new remote router as ezvpn (in network extension mode) but the external interface doesn't have a public IP address, traffic will be natted by a gateway router 3g.

  Do you think this would work?

  Ezvpn remote router has a public IP address on the interface external or is - it possible to nat traffic?

  With customer VPN Cisco NAT Traversal works perfectly? It works even with a client of material.

  Thank you

  Johnny

  Johnny,

  He will be working perfectly. Tunnel will negotiate by using Nat - T on udp/4500 packages. Encrypted apcket will leave the interface of the router that will be natted by 3G modem.

  Incase of internet traffic. If you nat traffic on the router outside of the interface subsequently, it will be 3 G Router nattedby as well to go on the Internet.

  Kind regards

  Bad Boy

  P.S. Please mark this message as 'Responded' If you find this information useful so that it brings goodness to other users of the community

• PIX-to-client VPN and how to reach on other interfaces systems

  Hi all

  I've implemented a Pix-to-Client VPN and it seems works ok.

  As you can see, customer gets the same inside the class address (192.168.100.x) so I can reach across systems.

  My questions are:

  If I give different subnet pool addresses, how can 1 I still reach inside systems?

  2 if I have other systems on these interfaces such dmz1 (192.168.10.0) dmz2 (192.168.20.0) how to get to these systems of the

  even the client vpn access?

  Concerning

  Alberto Brivio

  IP local pool vpnpool1 192.168.100.70 - 192.168.100.80

  access-list 102 permit ip 192.168.100.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.0 255.255.255.0

  NAT (inside) - 0 102 access list

  Permitted connection ipsec sysopt

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac trmset1

  Crypto-map dynamic map2 10 set transform-set trmset1

  map map1 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto dynamic map2

  map1 outside crypto map interface

  ISAKMP allows outside

  ISAKMP identity address

  part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 10

  encryption of ISAKMP policy 10

  ISAKMP policy 10 md5 hash

  10 2 ISAKMP policy group

  ISAKMP life duration strategy 10 86400

  vpngroup address vpnpool1 pool test

  vpngroup split tunnel 102 test

  vpngroup test 1800 idle time

  test vpngroup password *.

  It is generally preferable to use another range of IP addresses. The PIX will know that the VPN Client uses that vary and route it properly whitch is not the case when you are using the same IP range as the inside interface.

  To access another interface use the SHEEP (your ACL 102) access list which disables NAT between the VPN and the neworks to which you want to connect.

  Example of config:

  access-list allowed SHEEP Internalnet ISubnetMask VPN-pool 255.255.255.0 ip

  access-list allowed SHEEP DMZnet DMZSubnetMask VPN-pool 255.255.255.0 ip

  NAT (inside) 0 SHEEP

  AAA-server local LOCAL Protocol

  AAA authentication secure-http-client

  Permitted connection ipsec sysopt

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac TRANS

  Crypto-map dynamic outside_dyn_map 20 game of transformation-TRANS

  card crypto 65535 REMOTE ipsec-isakmp dynamic outside_dyn_map

  REMOTE client authentication card crypto LOCAL

  interface card crypto remotely outside

  ISAKMP allows outside

  ISAKMP identity address

  ISAKMP nat-traversal 20

  part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 10

  ISAKMP policy 10 3des encryption

  ISAKMP policy 10 md5 hash

  10 2 ISAKMP policy group

  ISAKMP life duration strategy 10 86400

  IP pool local VPNPool x.y.z.1 - x.y.z.254

  vpngroup VPNGroup address pool VPNPool

  vpngroup VPNGroup dns-server dns1 dns2

  vpngroup VPNGroup default-domain localdomain

  vpngroup idle 1800 VPNGroup-time

  vpngroup VPNGroup password grouppassword

  username, password vpnclient vpnclient-password

  sincerely

  Patrick

• Remote access VPN and VPN S2S

  Remote access users are not able to reach our remote network via a tunnel from site to site VPN between two ASA 5505.

  I've seen several threads about this here, I ran through the procedure step by step http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00807f9a89.shtml ... I got stabbed at setting split tunneling and nat exemption, but it seems that I'm missing something. Remote access users can reach the main site, but not on the remote site.

  (Vpn-houston) remote access using 192.168.69.0/24.

  The main site (houston) using 10.0.0.0/24

  The remote site (lugoff) uses 10.0.1.0/24

  Could I get a new look on my configs and maybe point out where I have gone wrong?

  Thank you...

  at first glance,'re missing you 'same-security-traffic permit intra-interface' in houston

  you're also missing this in houston:

  access-list extended sheep allowed ip vpn-houston 255.255.255.0 255.255.255.0 lugoff

  and this:

  permit access list extended ip vpn-houston 255.255.255.0 outside_cryptomap_1 255.255.255.0 lugoff

  and you will need to remove the second card useless encryption 3 lugoff, delete them:

  No crypto outside_map 3 game card address outside_cryptomap_3

  no card crypto outside_map 3 set pfs

  no card crypto outside_map 3 set peer 75.148.248.81

  no card crypto outside_map 3 the value transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA

  Let us know how it goes

• VPN and Annyconnect on the same port

  You can configure asa firewall to allow the anyconnect VPN and then allow the traffic of users annyconnect cross tunnel vpn on the firewall even on remote site? Users on the local network can connect to a remote site via vpn tunnel but not anyconnect users.

  Thank you

  Of course, it is a common requirement. You just need to make sure to include the address pool of the AnyConnect users in your access list mentioned by the cryptomap used in the tunnel of site.