Similar Questions

• Photoshop CS5 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 Crash

  My profile:

  Photoshop CS5 (x 64)

  Windows 7 x 64

  NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 (latest driver v197.45)

  Intel i7 920 2.67 GHz

  My card is listed as tested for CS5 and NVIDIA card says that it's compatible with CS5, but today after using it, my screen went blank and the display driver recovered himself. It took about 5 minutes until Photoshop CS5 became responsive and the GPU features have been disabled. I will try GPU in advanced mode and basic instead of the normal mode to see what happens, but it's a shame that I have problems of this kind. I also had problems with CS4 like that.

  What I did to cause this problem: "I clicked on" Place... "to place an object, and that's when it crashed. It happens randomly that I use Photoshop. Please NVIDIA or Adobe to solve this problem. I love the GPU features and I want to run them, but this crash is boring to spend as much on the purchase of this product. I hate to have to pay to contact Adobe technical support, it should be included with the purchase of the software!

  How do I fix this without having to go through the mode based GPU or disabled GPU?

  Well my crash started back with the latest drivers again with the registry tweak and even disabled completely OpenGL. I was going to start to use Gimp but decided to make one last search and then found this thread: http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=179747&st=20

  Holy cow, thanks to this thread, I solved the problem! This idea of downclocking the card itself and other questions related power led me to this fix: go to the NVIDIA Control Panel--> manage settings 3D--> global settings and opt for 'Power Management Mode' 'Prefer Maximum Performance' (the 'Adaptive' default setting value seemed to be the culprit). And that's all! The key here is change the setting of "Global", as my individual programs were already set to 'Prefer Maximum Performance'. I have worked very well for 3 days now, and I can cause the error to happen again by changing to "Adaptive".

  I do that and then turned backon OpenGL and set it to 'normal' and so far I've not dropped yet. For all of you who read this, I'll update if I have everything longer blocks, so if there is no more info about me which means this fix has remained strong.

• AE will never work with / support Nvidia GTX-970 cards?

  AE will never work with / support Nvidia GTX-970 cards?

  All the features but that already work with these cards. The only exception is the GPU acceleration of the plotted in 3D rendering engine Department, which is an obsolete feature that is phased out.

  Details:

  Features GPU (CUDA, OpenGL) in After Effects

• a few waves in my monitor working with the premier cc... my VGA Nvidia GTX 650 card. How to fix it.  drivers are updated.

  a few waves in my monitor working with the premier cc... my VGA Nvidia GTX 650 card. How to fix it.  drivers are updated.

  a few waves in my monitor working with the premier cc... my VGA Nvidia GTX 650 card. How to fix it.

• Video card Support AMD R9 270 and NVIDIA GTX 750Ti

  I wanted to ask if the 270 R9 AMD or NVIDIA GTX 750 Ti are supported by Adobe first Pro CC.

  In this link

  http://helpx.Adobe.com/Premiere-Pro/system-requirements.html

  is written:

  AMD R7 (all models)?

  AMD R9 290 (270 not?)

  While the NVIDIA GTX 750 it says nothing.

  Can you help me?

  Thank you

  Always select Nvidia right now when there is an option. CUDA surpasses far CL open in Adobe right now. I also suggest the 760GTX card instead.

  Eric

  ADk

• CS5 and NVIDIA card

  Hello, what new NVIDIA cards work better with CS5?  Listed for NVIDIA video cards are old...

  Thank you

  Craig

  Don't know what you are really asking for. All the 'work', you gave have installed them properly, but "better"? It's almost a moot point, at least with AE. It uses OpenGL sparingly, is not really relevant. Each contemporary map will be fullfill these requirements. You can throw it in a 3 year card, since the tray of 20 dollars for the budget, and you would see no difference for a 400 high-end one buck. Pretty well, this applies to EI, but in some extent to Photoshop and other programs. The one notable exception here would be Premiere Pro if you want to use the Mercury playback engine, but if you do not - well, save money, buy a mid-range card at best.

  Mylenium

• PPPro cs5 and NVIDIA Control Panel driver

  In one of the threads earlier someone said that when they went to the Nvidia Control Panel they only saw PPpro CS4 listed and no CS5. I have the same problem. Is this a problem? Of course, it is a hack of a GTX 480 version. Thanks again once Roman I should however say it works!

  No, it's a limitation of the nVidia Driver has no consequences. She simply search the file "Adobe first Pro.exe" regardless if it's CS4 or CS5.

• MBL, CS5 and nvidia driver

  I'm having a problem with the MBL (version CS5).  I get a message "Not responding" when I opened the EDIT of the plugin section.  The screen goes black then white then the message.

  I have contaced red giant and they say:

  Update for case # 16565

  
  

  Hello Craig,.

  
  

  We currently have a problem of compatibility with the latest driver from Nvidia. Can you try to go back to an older version of the Nvidia driver and let me know if this solve your problem?

  
  

  Thank you
  -Nate

  Would you do that in a system that works perfectly otherwise?  (WIn 7, Quadro FX3800 etc...)

  Can someone let me know which version of the NVIDIA driver they use it please.  How will I know what is common and what to restore?

  GDR - I sent you a PM, because I know that it works for you as tested yesterday.

  "

  Nvidia drivers automatically update? »

  No, they do not. If 266.35 is always available, go with it. MBL has worked with her, and you can still use the HD Audio driver for HDMI output just in case.

  Use the 266.45 without the audio driver as a last resort.

  It's getting late, I have to close during the night.

  Good luck

• SLI and NVIDIA quadro graphics card

  Is it possible to use with view, graphics nvidia quadro in SLI mode?

  No, the SLI is a different beast.

  It is possible, but not supported in some way, to devote 2 GPU:s to a virtual office and you can then potentially use 1 of the gpu:s for load calculation and graphics.

  Linjo

• Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bit and my DirectX diagnostic tool says that my current version is DirectX 11, but when I try to run space engineers, it tells me that I need to run DirectX 11

  * Original title: DirectX and space engineers

  Hello, I am running Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bit and my diagnosis tool DirectX says that my current version is DirectX 11, but when I try to run space engineers and use a world with planets, he tells me that I need to run DirectX 11. When I go to my DirectX folder, it says that I am running DirectX 9.0, I'm very confused and internet only helped me at all up to this point. All suggestions/help and help will be greatly appreciated.

  Well, is it not a strange ball game? Minimum = DX9 and DX11 for planets.

  Looks like no shore leave for you then... :)

  "NOTE: the minimum requirements are enough to run the game, but without the global functions,

  which requires DirectX 11. »

  "When I go into my file DirectX it tells me that I'm running DirectX 9.0"

  Direct X folder?

  Win7 has DX9, 10 & 11. However, older graphics cards are not be able to use DX11 (or DX10 if old enough).

  It comes to graphics cards which are older than AMD HD 5000 (version ' 09) and Nvidia GTX 400 (exit 10) series.

  EDIT: This also applies to the older map HD4000 Intel integrated graphics (Inc., HD3000, and all the "GMA" graphic integrated).

  ----------------------

  -Here is a list of the .dll Direct X files you when files are updated.
  There are more files DX (Xinput and audio), but these are most of the graphs related to Direct X .dll

  Go to Windows / System 32 folder (and SysWOW64 if you have 64-bit).
  -They are in alphabetical order and begin by d3dx9_24.dll > 43. Then d3dx10 - 33 43 >
  . & Finally d3dx11 - 42 43 >.
  It should also be--d3d9, d3d10 and d3d11. These come before the D3Dcompilers - 33 > 43.

  If all of these files is missing update Direct X using the DX Web Installer.

  Download DirectX end-user Runtime Web Installer from the official Microsoft Download Center

  Sometimes, a file is corrupt (mainly by games always reinstall DX unnecessarily). I have this case

  DX must be reinstalled using the full DirectX redist (June 2010) -

  Download details - Microsoft Download Center - DirectX Redist (June 2010)

  .

• ENVY 15 t-K200: ENVY 15 t-k200 doesn't use NVIDIA GTX 850 M

  I have an ENVY 15 t-k200 (K2T37AV) with processor i7-5500u, 16 GB of ram, Intel HD Graphics 5500 and NVIDIA GTX 850 M running Windows 10 64. The problem is running any application requiring the use of the NVIDIA card, the computer does not him.  I went into NVIDIA Control Panel to select the NVIDIA card as the preferred graphics processor and selected the NVIDIA for specific programs, no change in performance.  I've updated all the drivers, no change in performance. On paper, this computer must manage the games and apps that I use without problems, but running 3DMark benchmarks, I get very low scores and any graphic training application that I use is minced.

  Please help... How can I get my graphics card work properly?  Is there a bios setting I need to change? Or?

  Thank you

  I contacted HP Support directly (funny, I thought it was part of the HP support). In a Nutshell, it 1) uninstall the NVIDIA driver and card 2) downloaded the latest driver from NVIDIA and 3) installed the new driver.  I checked that the computer was once again work correctly, go to the NVIDIA card if necessary using a program of video reference I used to diagnose the problem in the first place.

  The problem seems to be that if you're updating the NVIDIA driver without uninstall the old driver first, something is not and the rocking computer is more on the NVIDIA card when necessary. The NVIDIA Control Panel will be simply install the new driver updated without uninstall the old driver. Even if you go to HP or NVIDIA and download updated driver directly, or advisor to uninstall the old driver before you install the new driver.

  Even if you install the driver is the latest driver, follow these steps if the NVIDIA card does not work as it should be.

  I used 3DMark demo to diagnose my video card, when he showed my computer run better than 0% of the tested systems, I knew there was a problem.

• NVIDIA Gtx 650 ti boost vs Nvidia Gtx 580

  Hello world

  I have a difficult question on nvidia gtx video cards.

  The nvidia gtx 650 ti boost adeguate is for editing video in full HD with Premiere Pro Cs6?

  I chose this video card, because the price is very interesting: 'only' €150 (more or less)

  Another question: is it sparkly for editing sporadically After Effects Cs6 of Pentecost?

  I compared the 650 gtx ti boost with the gtx 580. The second is more powerful, but the price is €450 (more or less). I found the gtx 580 used at €200.

  Question: What is the best choice? GTX 650 ti new boost or gtx 580 used (and perhaps overclocked)?

  Thank you.

  Reference:

  Pushed GTX 650 ti http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-650ti-boost/specifications

  GTX 580 http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-580/specifications

  Yes, but not only the CPU, it will be the processor, the memory and the disk (s) that will be the bottleneck. The 580 will be idle most of the time since the rest cannot follow.

  It's like install a reducer of formula 1 in an old Fiat 500 for 10 years.

• Help! PrPro 5.5.2 and nVidia 285.62 on GTX 285

  OK, I had posted about this over a month ago in the main forum and thought that I had solved the problem, but he's back. Unfortunately I can't find my original message to resurrect as Jive seems to have deleted my history of the position beyond two weeks ago... :-(

  In any case, I bought 5.5 PrPro to work with images of RED Epic and installed alongside my 5.0.3 on Win 7 x 64 Ultimate. I ran all the (5.5.2) and then updates on my first startup received the message that I wouldn't have CUDA support because there was no active CUDA installed card. I knew it wasn't a good cause, I used CUDA always 5.0.3, so I checked and found that my drivers have been clearly exceeded. I updated my drivers nVidia nVidia site, rebooted and restarted the PrPro. Everything worked very well. Until I had to export my first video. During export I constantly got a nVidia Driver error, saying that my system resources does not match what was required by the program (something on this topic could not get small enough packages for the video to process card), and he had to close. Closing the box pilot error nVidia also force PrPro quit. I discovered that I had no problem to run without CUDA, and could successfully export my video. However, I can't afford the time to run without CUDA because it significantly speeds up processing time, especially with multiple layers of epic sequences.

  So finally, I did a full clean and reinstall the entire system, starting with the most recent non-beta drivers available for the nVidia card and put only 5.5 on the system and fully updated in 5.5.2. He acknowledged my CUDA card and there is no problem. I worked offshore and on the (very light work at Christmas) until today when I dug in my big epic project and started doing some basic settings the scale and speed on some clips and a few CC primary with the CC RGB and Three-Way CC. I often get the same error message from nVidia that I was me before I did the wipe and re-install and it kills my workflow and productivity. I turned CUDA backtrack again this afternoon to get this a chronology finished and exported, but I really need this back.

  , What has changed on the CUDA support between 5.0.3 and 5.5.2 who screwed up things with my GTX 285? And what should I do to fix things and get them operational back? Before the clean and reinstall I tried several versions of the nVidia drivers, roll a few back as far as I could go and keep CUDA support and the new drivers beta that Ann and others had recommended. Unfortunately for buying a new graphics card probably is not an option since I have already spent over $ 2300 in a few months on hardware and software upgrades.

  As a reminder, my other features of the system are as follows:

  Intel Core i7 920 2.67 GHz (no overclock)

  12 GB OF RAM

  250 GB SATA OS/programs

  500 GB SATA-Graphics/Pictures/other stuff/pagefile

  3-disk SATA RAID-5 2 TB project video files

  4 drive SATA RAID-5 8 TB (PCIe RAID card) video data files

  Project files to export/still Video 1 TB SATA

  4 TB eSATA backup (not currently in use)

  400 GB eSATA backup project (not currently in use)

  This additional technical information of my card GTX285, taken from the nVidia system information dialog box:

  Driver version: 285.62

  DirectX support: 10

  DirectX Runtime Version: 11

  CUDA cores: 240

  Graphic clock: 648 MHz

  Processor clock: 1476 MHz

  Memory clock 1242 MHz (2484 MHz data rate)

  Memory interface: 512 bits

  Total available graphics memory: 4 095 MB

  Dedicated video memory: 1024 MB GDDR3

  Video memory: 0 MB

  Shared system memory: 3071MB

  Video BIOS version: 62.0.58.00.03

  IRQ: 30

  BUS: PCI Express x 16 Gen2

  Then this morning when I arrived I supported the allocation of memory PrPro back up to 6 GB (6 GB leaving for other programs) and so far I had no accidents, despite some heavy CC and cutting... Hope that this trend continues. I'm still working with 4 k files on a timeline of 1080 (even if the timeline is a timeline of RED, and it's the same settings with respect to everything else).

  If I can verify that this is a memory problem, I'm going to submit a bug report at first... unless 12 GB is really too small to work effectively with such things, I find it hard to believe that since I have never had a problem with this before with 5.0.3 or earlier...

• What for CS4 & first CS5.5 NVIDIA graphics card?

  I just upgraded to CS5.5 Production Premium, but I'm still using XP 32 bit. This means that I had to load the version of CS4, Premiere and After Effects. Sooner or later I'm going to 64-bit Win, but in the meantime what graphics card will give me the best value for money and still be useful for CS5.5 later? Money is not a problem, I don't want to pay for something and not benefit from. What's worse, is that adobe doesn't even list most recent maps as the 8800 and Quadro FX for CS4! Were not cards GTX available before CS5 is released? I need to update a file in CS4 applications for them to accept cards for the treatment of the GPU?

  Adobe and NVIDIA continue to push the Quadro cards but when you look at the benchmarks looks than both GTX cards. I will use the system for a game sometimes DX11 is a must. I have a watercooled i7 920 OC @ 4.0 GHz and very stable, time never exceed 60 ° C at full load. I have 6 GB of RAM and you use a memory manager to access the RAM on XP can use and use it for virtual mem and caches etc. But my current graphics card is one OC slightly had 9800GT w / 512MB. My system doesn't like rub video that is not rendered unless it's at lower resolutions and of course I made to be as fast as possible.

  Looking around I see:

  GTX560-TI @ $240

  GTX570 @ $300

  GTX480 @ $300

  GTX570 @ $300

  GTX580 @ $460

  Quadro 4000 @ $550

  Quadro 5000 @ $1200

  So, what is the secret? Where's the sweet spot?

  TIA

  M. issues,

  IMO, it of the case of 570, but check here to decide if the 560 or 580 maybe better alternatives for you: http://ppbm5.com/MPE%20Charts.php

• Engine reading Mercury and NVIDIA cards

  I assumed that this has been discussed in the past, but my research turned up empty.

  I run CS4 body for a while but am upgrading to 5.5 organization and I also want to go ATI to NVIDIA to get CUDA mercury reading improving.

  I'm glad I checked that I discovered that only a very few cards consumer (no Quadro) is listed.

• GeForce GTX 285 (Windows and Mac OS)
• GeForce GTX 470 (Windows)
• GeForce GTX 570 (Windows)
• GeForce GTX 580 (Windows)

I want to go with the consumer line because my PC is also used for other things and is not a PC edition devoted.

If it's true that these are the only ones that work?  Or is that a lot of PC of areas where things work (such as memory and motherboards), but not everyone is put to the test...

I saw a site where it said that you had to hack a file or something in order to get other cards NVIDIA Cuda to work in the mercury with Pr Pro mode even if they were equal to or greater in power than these...

Thanks for the help,

BJBBJB1

I guess the question is if you think Adobe is likely to reduce the number of cards taken in charge or he hard code in the program.  Personally, I think CS6(+?) could fully support CUDA cards.

FWIW, I just do the hack with my GTX 560 Ti card and it worked.  I'm running the PPBM right now.  Unfortunately, my AMD Opteron 165 system based, RAM DDR (not number) based has a LARGE number of bottlenecks that kill performance, BUT it's much better with the 560 card than without!

The previous card, I had was an ATI Radeon X1950XTX.  However, I gave up on them after that they don't provide for her drivers for Win7.  Yes, the Vista 64 drivers worked, but without support, I have a quite expensive anchor point.  IMO, Nvidia, however, is much better than ATI in driver support.  So I will stay with them for a while.  Just my experience, though.  Hey, I have a few old 6600GT cards and Nvidia has drivers for Win7 64-bit available.  And it's an old card.  In any case...

The GTX 570 should provide more than enough power for the current iterations of first.  ATI provides an 'equivalent' (OpenCL), but Adobe, for some reason, is not support.

I hear you on Adobe supporting a larger number of CUDA cards.  I know that CUDA programmers and they tell me that the code is not limited by the cards.  You call the driver/CUDA features card and it works.  So I'm at a loss to understand that.  It simply limits their customer satisfaction.  It is not like they are not big enough to test.

FWIW, the GTX 560 it seems to work well with CS5 and I guess would work well with CS5.5.

Good luck in your adventures.  As I buy the additional hardware, I'll try to update here.

Scott