CSA - deletion rules?

Similar Questions

• Foreign key delete rule: no matching combination does not show a difference to compare models

  Hello

  I've noticed that if there are in the relational model a foreign key with delete rule NO ACTION and in the database (Data Dictionary), the delete rule is RESTRICT, no difference appears in the dialog box to compare. The difference is displayed if the delete rule for example is CASCADE and RESTRICT.

  Kind regards

  Robert

  Hi Robert,.

  Thanks for reporting this problem.  I connected a bug on this subject (21754221).

  This situation does not normally flow when an Oracle database is imported, but may occur when importing other types of database.

  Kind regards

  David

• Display filter using at DFW unintentionally deletes rules!

  We had a nasty surprise, while the application of a filter on the distributed firewall set rule to find specific rules. When you change the rules even if you have a filter and their publication, the rules that have been filtered are removed!

  Isn't this supposed to be a display filter? Looks like a bug to me! We use NSX 6.2

  If anyone has experienced this?

  Albert

  This is a bug and is fixed in version 6.2.2

  https://KB.VMware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalID=2141155

  Dale

• Delete the rule not generated by DDL

  Hello
  
  I use SQL Developer Data Model (Version 3.1.1.703) and experience the following issue:
  
  I have a table with a foreign key and a delete rule 'SET NULL'. However if I generate the DDL for "SQL Server 2005" then the rule is not there. Only if I change the rule of "CASCADE" then it is generated correctly. Is this a bug or am I missing something?
  
  Thanks in advance for your help,
  Michael

  Hi Michael,

  Thanks for your comments. I logged on that bug.

  Philippe

• I can't change the rules on GBA 5.8.1.4.3

  Cisco Application Deployment Engine OS Release: 2.2ADE-OS Build Version: 2.2.2.015ADE-OS System Architecture: x86_64
  
  Copyright (c) 2005-2015 by Cisco Systems, Inc.All rights reserved.Hostname: ACS01-AAA
  
  Version information of installed applications---------------------------------------------
  
  Cisco ACS VERSION INFORMATION-----------------------------Version : 5.8.1.4.3Internal Build ID : B.462Patches :5-8-0-32-3

  I still have the problem with a blank "political access > Services > Service selection of access rules" after you apply the patch 3. Maybe because I deleted rule before, I found a bug.

  Correct, the rules are deleted before you install the hotfix.

  This State can be recovered by installing the hotfix.

  Patch will ensure that there are no other problems.

• Engine rules Oracle political Aitomation VS Oracle

  Anyone have experience working with the OPA and the ore?
  
  How the rules of the ore can be migrated in OPA?
  
  Where can I Get ORE Documents and evaluation Installer?

  Side note:

  WebDAV also provides a possibility to store your rules files in the management systems content such as SharePoint (which can have versions lit.)

  As I understand it, the thing's not store/access/reviewing the OPA to pronounce on a Web site. The trick is the adding/changing/deleting rules outside the tool Oracle policy automation with a high level of confidence that the changes are correct.

  Personally, I would limit people to insert comments and normal text in documents rules outside the ability to compile/test in OPM.

  One last comment. You can, of course, save as documents such as "Web Pages" or PDF if you want to read only web pages of your rules of takeover by people who do not have Microsoft Office...

• ORACLE: RULE vs CHOOSE

  Can someone help me with the following query:
  Query 1 runs slowly
  

  delete from tempsevnd_temp t 
  where t.order_number in (select order_number           from sevnd s
            where s.order_number = t.order_number
              and s.call_status = 'C')
  
  PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
  
   
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  | Id  | Operation                     |  Name           | Rows  | Bytes | Cost  |
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  |   0 | DELETE STATEMENT              |                 |   328 |  5576 |   986 |
  |   1 |  DELETE                       | TEMPSEVND_TEMP  |       |       |       |
  |   2 |   NESTED LOOPS SEMI           |                 |   328 |  5576 |   986 |
  |   3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL          | TEMPSEVND_TEMP  |   328 |  2296 |     2 |
  |   4 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| SEVND           |    69M|   663M|     3 |
  |   5 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN          | I_SEVND         |    13 |       |     2 |
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   
  Note: cpu costing is off, PLAN_TABLE' is old version

  Now, I use the indicator / * + rule * /, and the above query runs pretty fast:

  delete /*+ rule*/  from tempsevnd_temp t 
  where t.order_number in (select order_number           from sevnd s
            where s.order_number = t.order_number
              and s.call_status = 'C')
              ;
  
  PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
  
   
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  | Id  | Operation                     |  Name           | Rows  | Bytes | Cost  |
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  |   0 | DELETE STATEMENT              |                 |       |       |       |
  |   1 |  DELETE                       | TEMPSEVND_TEMP  |       |       |       |
  |   2 |   FILTER                      |                 |       |       |       |
  |   3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL          | TEMPSEVND_TEMP  |       |       |       |
  |   4 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| SEVND           |       |       |       |
  |   5 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN          | I_SEVND         |       |       |       |
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   
  Note: rule based optimization, PLAN_TABLE' is old version

  The results are the same with IN and EXISTS.
  Please suggest what is the difference between the two?

  user1170666 wrote:
  I analyzed the original table, and the temporary table is a refreshment, a daily fall.
  This used to run fast, do not know what went wrong...

  Can u explain wht happens when I give tip RULE?

  If you see execution plan for CBO his go to the SEMI of NESTED LOOP and SET his will for the FILTER.

  I suggest that scan you the temporary table also.

• How to undeploy deployed in planning business rules

  I'm unable to undeploy deployed on Production test management rules. Removal of the calculation Manager leaves BR in planning... is there in another option?

  Try this http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17236_01/epm.1112/cmgr_admin/ch07s03s01.html

  "To delete a business rule or ruleset from an application after the deployment of the business rule or the ruleset, make it ineligible for deployment by clearing the check box next to its name in the deployment view. You can then perform a full deployment of demand by opening and deploy. »

  You have already deleted rule of Calc manager tries to create empty rules with the same name (if the first full deployment would not help)

  Published by: vvipirailo on June 6, 2012 10:42

• A little fuzzy with #body - apple

  Problem: After the change of style, click space is in the wrong place.

  This could be a firefox problem 45.0.1?

  Details: When the CSA style rules contain:

  {#body-apple}

  Width: 100%! important;

  min-width: 0px! important;

  }

  

  on a page like:

  iPad in business and education

  The words do not turn blue or can be, click on when the cursor is directly on the word.  To have the desired effect, the more the cursor above the word.

  The cursor acts as expected without the above rule. Unfortunately, without the rule, form CAD pages ending too wide.  Notice how had it appears above the word New.  The other words are too standoffish.

  

  The rules I use are here:

  http://pastebin.com/zrHDrd1d

  I didn't notice this problem until about a month.  Yes, the problem occurred before the operation with badge.

  R

  It seems to me that emphasis is placed on space - invoke FF "inspect element" - this is the area

  

• Prospects & junk e-mail

  Did someone there running Outlook for Mac?  I switched to Mac from Windows last year and I really wanted to keep MS Office

  However, one of the few things that always gets me is spam is always end up in my Inbox.  Every day I've highlight and send to junk - on Windows it would be ' learning ' but does not seem to occur with the Mac version

  I've reported several times but still no improvement

  Any ideas?

  Unfortunately, no spam filter is perfect.  Your best bet is to look at the e-mail addresses and filter by your own profiles observed.

  E-mail addresses ending for example to the country, that you are not pregnant .top and .xyz can all be added to your emails to send to your trash or delete rules.

• WAG320N - automatically opens and close a UDP port (3658)

  Hello

  I noticed that in my router as the router EOP journal a port automatically without human intervention, and after a few router time closes the port.

  Here is the log file from my router which opens the port and closes after a couple of hours.

  LOG------------------------------

  Tue, 2010-02-09 10:02:16 - AddPortMapping: NULL: 3658 external to the UDP Protocol 10.1.1.253:3658 for: 10.1.1.253:3658 to 3658 (UDP) with timeout:0
  Tue, 2010-02-09 10:02:16 - no authorization rule corresponding: accept the default (n_perms = 0)
  Tue, 2010-02-09 10:02:16 - redirect port 3658 UDP protocol 10.1.1.253:3658 for: 10.1.1.253:3658 to 3658 (UDP)
  Tue, 2010-02-09 10:02:16 - creating pass rule UDP Protocol 10.1.1.253:3658 for: 10.1.1.253:3658 to 3658 (UDP)

  .....

  Tue, 2010-02-09 12:52:59 - DeletePortMapping: external port: 3658, Protocol: UDP
  Tue, 2010-02-09 12:52:59 - deleting the port UDP 3658 forwarding rule
  Tue, 2010-02-09 12:52:59 - trying to delete rules at index 0

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Why is this happening?

  Yes. Exactly. Your PS3 will open this port via UPnP.

• Cisco NAC features?

  Hello

  I noticed that there are some features in my v4.7.2 Cisco NAC Manager of production? Can someone explain to me briefly what I can do with these features;

  1. What can a Network Scanner in the title of the device management > own access, in do CAM? This feature will focus on my network more away?

  2. I noticed that to add rules of traffic under the management of the users control > CAM user roles, is easy, assuming that I have many roles, but to remove them, I have to do this one by one. Is this statement true or false?

  Kind regards

  RAM

  + 6-0122918870

  Hi Ram,

  The scanner add overhead to the network. Plugins more you add, the more support there.

  Nessus scan is really not possible in academia. Scanning requires administrative access to the machines and the customer firewall allowing traffic from the clean access server. It's much more plausible in a managed desktop scenario.

  You're right about the deletion rules, there is no way to support no way to make a deletion block at this time.

  Hope that helps.

  Cordially, Jeremy

• Group ACS 5.3 removal Migrated_NDGs

  Hello

  I got the task to disentangle a 5.3 ACS server, devices are all imported from a former ACS 4.x server. All the devices in the "Migrated_NDGs" of the Group was created by the migration tool.

  Since I have no need of this group is safe to just delete the Group and the devices will remain in ACS?

  The only groups of network device I really need are the groups 'Rent' and 'Device Type'. Unfortunately, I don't have another server to test on and I do not want to delete the Group and find out that 700 + devices have also disappeared from ACS!

  You also wouldn't not possible to the device to export to CSV, delete them all of CSA, delete the 'Migrated_NDGs' group and then use the CSV file to import the devices return again, but less the Group column "Migrated_NDGs."

  Any help much appreciated.

  Mel

  I just tried this on my server and things worked well.

  If you delete the NDG has child nodes nodes, you may need to remove these nodes first, and when you do this, if there are devices that reference the node that you are deleting, then they get modified to refer to the root node. When finally only the root node is left then can remove the NDG.

  Having said that I recommend to do an export of network devices before starting a backup

  Would be interested to hear how you got and that things went well

• Reg: Oracle audit regular performance impact

  Dear all,

  Oracle Database 11g R2 11.2.0.1 SE1

  Currently in the development database, I activated the regular audit on SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE for about 10 (more accessible) tables on 140

  The growth rate of aud$ table is about 100 files per minute (on average) and the DB is accessible by 20 people simultaneously.

  I also planned the DELETE task for aud$ table every night at 12:00. (Delete rule-> SYSDATE - 2)

  This audit decreases the performance of the database when I implement the same production?

  If all this, I want to stop an audit anyway, not the bug (Bug 1257564: noaudit does not turn off auditing database.) avoid me by doing this, since I've found the fixed version of the bug in oracle support.

  Guide to in this regard.

  Hi malfoy

  I suggest strongly that you to check the following documents concerning the Audit of the Oracle performance problems

  http://www.Oracle.com/technetwork/products/Audit-Vault/learnmore/TWP-security-auditperformance-166655.PDF

  However, it is very rare that someone has faced the bug you mentioned, and the only way to solve it is to raise SR Oracle support

  ----------------------------

  Best regards

  Kamran Aghayev has.

  Personal site removed by moderator - this is a violation of the terms of use of forums - include only personal website in your profile details *.

• Result of the search and common properties

  In a logic model I would change the rule of removal for a large number of entities (+ 100)

  I did a search in advanced by using a regular expression mode. Seaching for all relationships with the DELETE CASCADE rule.

  Using the properties button I can change the rule for all of them, but not a selection of the result of the search.

  Is there a way I can select a subset of the search results to edit common properties for?

  There is no simple way to improve the filter and filter entities that should not be changed.

  It is not a way to select only the relationship sought and then right-click to see a common properties dialog box?

  This way I can prevent a lot of repetitive actions...

  BTW I don't see not a way to change the parameter 'delete rule' for relationships in the logic model through research - common properties

  Hello

  I did a search in advanced by using a regular expression mode. Seaching for all relationships with the rule CASCADE.

  ....

  BTW I don't see a way to change the "delete rule' defining relationships I

  I also wonder how did you research on 'delete rule' property?

  Don't you know that you can combine the search on several properties with AND clause expressions? Then probably you can filter the best what to include in the result.

  If not for property 'rule of deletion' appearing in the search, you must edit the file Relations.xml in the directory datamodeler\datamodeler\xmlmetadata of your installation of DM-

  You must add the search of the = "true" attribute in the definition of the deleteRule property and restart Data Modeler

  Philippe