CVI 2013: macros return WARNING: will never be executed

Similar Questions

• Quick launch will never return?

  Use to be - back on 10.6, you can customize the toolbar to search and set up application icons for a quick launch. Having moved to 10.10 by a couple of Mac along the way and bringing more via a time machine backup, I still have some of these buttons to request that me is outsourced. Some of the icons have been removed if an application has been updated and cannot be replaced by the new. This feature will never be restored? I think he went after 10.6. I of course do not miss.

  

  What I do is use Keyboard maestro to assign apps to function keys. A little memorization required.

  https://www.keyboardmaestro.com/main/

• Crash of CVI 2013 with the debug version

  Hello

  I'm trying to migrate a large enough project of CVI 2012SP1-CVI 2013 and feels the clang compiler crash when I try a debug on some files.  Clang will also plant (' Labwindows/CVI the Clang compiler has stopped working... ") so I am just trying to compile the file (ctrl-k) in the editor.  Here's what I found:

  • A release not crushed
  
  
  • By turning the C99 power button has no effect
  
  
  • Change the warning level has no effect (other than the types of warnings that I get, of course)
  
  
  • Change the ' debug ' on 'No run-time check' eliminates the crash.
  
  
  • 'Enable. Option of obj"eliminates the crash.
  
  
  • By turning precompiled headers power has the effect.

  Here is the long message I get from the compiler when this happens (including all the warnings that are always displayed when the level is set to 'None'):

  

  Any thoughts?  Unfortunately it's a pretty big project that I can't post and it doesn't seem to be an indication of the or the lines in the file that he has problems with it, so I can't limit, although it seems to hint that he has problems with the structures of some sort.  The PC is running Windows 7 Pro 32 bit if it matters.

  Thank you.

  Hi tstanley,

  We could find the cause of the accident of the compiler from your code. We will settle in the next update and you can follow with bug ID 422577.

  The issue occurs when in a function, you have a call to a function that returns a structure in a global variable and then refer to this world in another function. For example:

  struct Foo foo; global variable foo
  
  Sub FuncA()
  {
  
  foo = GetStructFoo();
  
  }
  Sub FuncB()
  {
  
  do something with foo / / crash
  
  }

  In this case is because we are bad associate information of temporary pointer with foo in FuncA. Then in FuncB, clang will crash when it tries to access this pointer information.

  There are two workaround solutions, but both require changes in the code.

  1. modify the function that returns the structure, GetStructFoo in my example, the return via a pointer parameter:

  void GetStructFoo(Foo *foo);

  2 use a temporary local variable to manipulate the structure returned and then assign its value to the overall structure:

  struct Foo tempFoo;

  tempFoo = GetStructFoo();

  foo = tempFoo;

  In our next update, we will include the fix for this bug.

• Compiler of CVI 2013: increment / decrement operator assessment

  Trying to pull an old project forward to 2013 CVI, I met a challenge, which is documented as follows:

  «In the summons, the value of the right operand is evaluated before indexing table is made in the left operand.» Expressions, such as a[i] = i++; will assess differently in LabWindows/CVI 2013 compared to previous versions. »

  (There is a somewhat related thread here to do with the order of function arguments are evaluated).

  This change in the order of evaluation is shocking to me. I guess there is some C history behind it, and I won't be able to change that.

  So my question is: what is the way easiest to identify all sites in my code where this could concern me? I ~ 75 000 lines of legacy code. Maybe some regex magic?

  Thank you

  Ian

  Hello

  I'm happy to help you.

  I have test the latest version of clang (3.7 builded SVN), and I can confirm that it detects this 'problem' as a warning (and many other warnings too).

  Also it can integrate with the IDE CVI as external compiler, so it is easy to switch from a regular compiler CVI and this one. I can write a few small "guide" later, if you are interested.

• I will never buy another Dell as long as I live

  I hate Dell with every fiber of my being. I got 2 computers, a M4700 and a M4800 and none of them worked and I run an online business and have not been able to work while they keep breaking. Brand new, works does not in the delivery. I'm trying to get a refund now on the 2rd broken one in 5 months, and I went through the usual India bounce around and have been waiting for 45 minutes again. Last week, I was logged out 15 times. I told my story at least 20 different representatives who never write it down and then disconnect me. I don't understand how they have clients, running a business like that. I'm a Web Designer and computer consultant so that people ask me what to buy all the time. I'm going to write my story and leave it on the net. I've never jerked around this property. If I asked them to loss of activity and all the hours I spent waiting and trying to get this problem fixed, it would be 20 k more. No lie. This is my hourly rate more business lost because I have not had my computer for 5-6 weeks on / off power in 5 months. I've been waiting for more than 60 minutes after being transferred from the India. I listen to this music on hold lively again. Since I bought the computer of origin in December, it never worked right. He was dead out of the box. They send a tech guy who has replaced most of the parts and it never worked right, then they send me the M4800 3 weeks and he broke completely two weeks after I got it. I want a refund. I don't want a 3rd computer. Also, I have no computer. I can't work. Of course Dell tells me that they can't pay back me, because the original order went from 30 days. Which is ridiculous. How can they do that when I have a computer that has worked since the first day. I gave them a chance to solve this problem, and it is not fixed. I'm not waiting 90 minutes and they refuse to refund my money. I have to wait another 3 to 4 weeks to get a new computer. I can't believe they do. Now, I entered my code of service 7 times and it is not recognize all the numbers that you enter. It's like a loop with them. I can't get help. It is a nightmare.

  I'm blogging on my site, but the story is not yet done yet! I still have it in draft form.
  I never thought that he would go so long... in 8 months. Here's my nightmare to date.

  This is a true story as incredible as it sounds when you read it. What I find the most amazing, is how Dell is still in business running it like that. After about four months of Dell, I realized that I need the entire document. And the story is not yet finished and it's been 8 months and 4 computers later.

  9/2013- My Acer is overheated and cannot manage the level of video processing that I need for my business.
  I start shopping for a computer that will last me for years and be durable and reliable. Read criticism of M4700 for PC Magazine and think it's a good deal and good computer for my needs.

  Buy 9/13 this deal includes Pro support which is very important for me because of my bad history with Dell and terrible customer. I'm charged and the clock of the guarantee starts even if it's another two months before I was able to use the computer. Takes a full 6 weeks to get it. They ran out of somewhere.

  Oct 2013- Is not a DVD/R in writing, somehow, I missed it on the prescription. Send it back. Takes still 4 weeks
  
  Nov 2013 happens - I knowledge now, I did not Support Pro, and they will not give to me because it my mistake when I don't have for the accessible reader into writing. Too busy to put in place, leave it for a few weeks.
  
  DEC/2013, start moving files and put in place, but working on two computers for a month. Finally get all the programs installed, start using the start and I get a blue screen of death and multiple shut downs when you are doing something to do with videos, and then it becomes closed and blue just randomly screens downs for no apparent reason.
  
  January 2014 - blue screen boot all the time, before it was once or twice a week. Download Dell Remote help - middle of 3 hours of the night and can't fix. Reference Dell group still 2 hours and they can't fix it. Computer will not make any video work. The main reason I bought it. I'm starting to find a lot of other people on the Dell forum having the same problems. A lot of broken computers and blue screens that appear constantly.

  May 2014- Dell finally give up and decide to send me a new computer. Will be 2-3 weeks to get to me.
  A better that they say. I ask them to switch me to Support Pro because I had so many problems, they say no.

  End June, 2014 New M4800 arrives - spend hours to move files, reactivate all of my graphics and design programs web, office suite and many many programs I use for my business. Two weeks later, I'm downloading some work online and the computer becomes black. Does not start, all the lights at the top of the fair Board flashing.

  July 2014 Call Dell, hours later, looks like the motherboard is bad. I have no computer and now I have no access to my emails and my files of the company and everything else I need. Tech comes out two days later, change the motherboard, video card and more. Computer still does not. He has no idea what the problem is. Ordered another motherboard, just came back two days later, works again on this matter and considers "non repairable computer." I call Dell and they CS Rep tells me is not repairable does not mean it can't be solved. I talk to him, how can you say that? I need another computer replacement and before another 4 weeks. Now, I have no access to my work for the last 8 months and e-mails and they suggest I have borrow your desktop to someone if I can use the hard drive!

  I have an external one put in place, but it is useless to this situation on a laptop. The guy told me that I have to take the computer share following its directions on the phone until they send me a replacement.
  What the? Dell is going to force me to disassemble the computer to the phone until they send me a replacement? I already remove other two computers, and I'm getting sick of the present. All I wanted was a computer that worked. I have spent so many hours on it, and now they are forcing me to disassemble a computer? What kind of service is that?

  I hang up and cry. So I'm on my work. I need to get the job done and I can't. I call Anthony, my guy tech who tried to repair the computer and he is shocked by what they want to me and told him and his boss will try to help me get a faster replacement computer. He will try to reopen the case and talk to someone at Dell. They are independent contractors, and I can see fighting for not to say anything negative. He feels really bad for me, but he has no power or on what they are doing.

  I'm taking a break to talk to Dell, since I did not have another clock free hours for you can call, be disconnected and fight with them again. Whenever I call, I have to me shore mentally to deal with all the UPS crash and useful people and tell my story over and over again since the departments that I take care of not not talk to each other, and NONE of my problems are documented for the another dept to read. It's a nightmare. I realize there is good chance that I won't have a computer for weeks, then I begin to dig all the old computers that I and my Acer I bought the Dell to replace.

  It's Friday and the Ministry of replacement is closed and no one can help me before Monday. I called my credit card and try to get a refund and the refund Dept. is closed for Citibank until Monday too.

  My Acer must be at the top of the unit. I put a sweater and work standing on the air conditioner. I spend the weekend to transfer all files from 8 months ago at my dad's computer.
  The transfer of 'easy' of windows is 9 and a half hours. I spent the next 3 hours reactivate and install programs that don't yield on and digging at the old licenses and codes, all of which are on a list on the broken computer.

  

  July 29, 2014 Monday morning: first of all I call Citicard, a refund would solve all my problems. I desperately want to forget Dell forever and just buy another brand. Card bank Citibank refuses a refund. They say that Dell has a 3 year warranty, they cannot help me. I cried as I hang up. This is the first time I did not use my American Express card for a major purchase and I'm seriously regretting this choice right now. I called Citibank before I used the card to buy this computer and they told me that they had the same policy for refund/replacement such as American Express. Amex would be of me reimbursed. You can count on them regarding such things. I will never buy something big with my Citibank credit card again.

  I decided to try again with a different CS Rep., I hope they won't have me disassemble the computer it's release-able before they order me my 3rd computer but I have my tools out and I ready to to do that if that's the only way I can get my replacement computer.

  Dell phone service is the worst and after that I finally find the right dept I ask for a refund and they say no way, but when they put me on hold, I learned to be queued means that you will be disconnected with Dell. I think that 'hold' is the code for hang up on this person. I added to the top how time may that I was hooked to the top/disconnected upward by them and it now more than 30 times. The total number of real. Can you imagine if I was a boss or an employee for Dell? This is not the case for me.

  I connect everything and everyone that I get, I ask their name, and ask them to call me if we get disconnected. In two hours I'm trying to get help this morning I eventually call Dell more than 8 times. One of them told me before it disconnects / places awaiting me, "our software is.". Two of the 8 people who pulled swear me they help me and promise to call me if we're disconnected but never call back me. Another said to me earlier in the day, "we had problems with some of the parts of these machines. I have names for everyone, but they are not real half the time and you can never talk to them or even to find them. Two hours later, 8 disconnects and 5 times my story and enter all my information on the phone and listen to their music on hold, I now hate with a passion.  I get a CS Rep named Eric who says he will take my case and take responsibility for it.  He will order me a replacement. Erik assures me that he will be in charge of my case and I don't have to continue to talk to different people. I get the confirmation email saying he'll come within 10 working days.

  Usually 2-3 weeks of not having a working machine. Another day of shooting. I can't do any work for my clients and work piling up. Children begging me to buy a computer from anyone but Dell and just sell the following that they send me on Ebay. I feel that how can I do this to someone else? I don't know how the guarantee would transfer more and honestly, I feel like it would be dishonest to stick to a person with this problem.

  7/30 Computer replacement number 3. I try to remove the hard disk from broken replacement machine number 2, but one of the 5 screws to remove to get out the hard disk is stripped. A screw away from my life back. I call Dell.
  Customer Service-says his name is "Alex", I ask to be sent to a tech person to remove the screw. Waiting and the phone for an hour. Refused. I told me they don't do that. I need to go somewhere and pay me or mail back into the computer and they will then send me the back of the hard drive.
  Within 10 working days. I've now had my computer for more than 5 weeks. I pray you, they refuse. I take the hardware to the computer store and they use their tools extractor and may not leave the screw. They are trying. I love my local hardware store. Thank you True Value Hardware in Castro Valley, you guys are the best. They are like your time old corner store. They are actually in the middle of a neighborhood. They seem to have a bit of everything and generous in offering to help you when you have these weird problems. I'm going home and email Eric, my rep cs who promised that he would take responsibility for my case, and I ask him to help me please. Here's what he sent back 24 hours later.
  "I'm sorry, Madam, but I must inform you that I no longer work in the Department of the workstation. I have moved to another Department and no longer have my old cases, including yours. Your case will be given to a new owner if. I trust that they will be able to solve your problem. ».
  I just laugh at it. I'm at the point now where the only thing that will make me feel better is to publish my story and leave my honest comments everywhere on the internet. Dell will spend millions to get new customers and then they treat them like that. What is the problem with this company? I will become the person walking anti-dell in my personal life.
  A dark reminder of what can happen with Dell if you have any kind of problems. I have send an email 'Mary', who told me her name was Alex yesterday, but my follow-up e-mail is Mary. Now I ask a confirmation email whenever I talk to someone, but I only get these about 1 5 times. I learned to try to force them to send me an e-mail while I'm still on the phone. I beg you to help me. No response... never.
  I now know to call, nobody will help twice. Just wait for that if you buy a Dell computer. You never have a person who will help you in fact. They are all fired the ball and you can't get real names, extensions or anything like that.
  
  7/31 call CS Rep name is Karla. 1 hour. I make sure Karla is going to call me at the time where I'm getting hung up. She is wise and never put me on hold for the whole time we're talking about. She puts just the phone down instead. Seriously, I think that it is the ONLY way that Dell will not cut you. I feel hope, it may be actually trying to help me. I request this be dealt with in order to return the computer and recover the hard disk. I'm ready to box it upward, and then return to the UPS Store for the 4th time to regain a Dell computer. I ask him if they can speed up it somehow since I am now 5 weeks without a working computer.
  At this point, I do not expect anything. I kept telling them how I run an online business and can't do my job and have the year last of my life on this hard drive. Why bother? They don't care. No one took in charge the world this month as any other 8 that my CS Rep John 1, whose email I can't access even more and they wouldn't give it to me once again when I asked. Karla talking to several departments different and after a lot of time to hold (but not actually put on hold, thank God), she tells me that they will send a technician home to remove the screw. Seriously? Can you even believe this? I begged Mary/Alex yesterday and she was cold and unyielding, there is no way that would happen. I expressed my disbelief to Karla, who said only: I am pleased that help you, it will be 3-4 days for the service call? Much better than the 10 days that looks more like 3 weeks.

  Independent contractor for Dell Anthony released two days later and can't get out the screw.
  Now he almost 05:00 for Dell and I will not be able to get any aid again until Monday, this guy Brian tells me that I'm out of warranty before it bothers even to read my file. I tell him I'm on my replacement computer 3rd of them so I'm certainly not out of warranty. And to find my service ticket, he put me on hold and... Click, disconnected. Every time. Like clockwork.

  I call back review this brand-new and the rep, Josephine said I have to put you on hold... I Scream no, until it can do (and disconnect me again), and I beg him to put just the phone down.  She does and I have heard all the people on the phone, wow, who are strong and then after 5 minutes it goes silent... oh no, please please do not disconnect me once again... I have to just sit here and wait for the operator turns on and says: ' If you want to make a call, please hang up and try again. Wow, I truly memorized by high hanging on so many times by Dell and hear the interrupt message. Josephine, he said now the warranty is not displayed. Honestly at this point, I think I should write off the 2000.00 for this machine and forget it. I easily lost 10 times x billable hours and work during this period of not being able to do my job and on the phone trying to correct problems with Dell. Josephine treated the return of order, and I ask him how can I be sure that I will come back this hard drive? I don't trust them at all. I do not hang up until I get the email of its confirming everything. Also sincere to someone of you other sufferers as it there, don't let them put you on hold! Tell them to put just the phone down. It's the only way you will not be disconnected.

  

  Since I bought the first Dell Sept 2013, I do not have the use of my computer for 4 months. Up to half of the time since I placed the original order. As of today, I am looking at another 2 weeks until they send me back my hard drive. I do not have a usable computer to return to my work online.
  I was forced to recreate jobs and combine work better as I can for my clients. My email is an obsolete year now and I have no access to the programs and files on the hard drive that has a stripped screw.

  TO BE CONFIRMED...

• message from Firefox: "page isn't redirecting properly" Firefox has detected that the server redirects the request for this address in a way that will never end. * Why this mess

  "The page isn't redirecting properly?

  i receive this warning on a daily basis. it seems to occur whenever i open a message  in gmail or try to send a message. anybody have a clue about this? thanks!
  

  Firefox has detected that the server redirects the request for this address in a way that will never end.

     *   This problem can sometimes be caused by disabling or refusing to accept
           cookies.
  

  See http://kb.mozillazine.org/The_page_is_not_redirecting_properly

• Performance of CVI 2013 SP2 with CVI 2015 - Windows XP problem

  I see that XP isn't an operating system in 2015 of the CVI.

  Most of our PC are Win7 now, but we have some legacy units which require XP due to a limitation of external controller processor.

  Is is possible to generate executables in 2015 CVI which will work correctly with the runtime of 2013?

  Alternatively, CVI SP2 from 2013 and 2015 CVI co-exist on the same PC development?

  I would not get stuck with CVI 2013 SP2 for the future just to maintain a few predictable XP-based PC.

  Hi Shr,

  I recommend reading through this community's message: https://decibel.ni.com/content/docs/DOC-23955

  Essentially, you can develop a code in CVI 2015 but set the executable to run on previous versions of the Run-Time Engine. Note that the older version of the RTE of Side-by-Side CVI is 2012. You can indeed install previous versions of the CVI on the same computer. The shared runtime will be set to the latest version. Other versions will be side-by-side. The code is not guaranteed to work with previous versions of the RTE so be sure to test the code locally before moving on to another computer.

• CVI 2013 generate invalid code

  Hello

  CVI 2013 generates an invalid code for the function pointer.

  For example, this code works very well in 2012 CVI, but not in CVI 2013. Any idea?

  #include 
  #include 
  
  struct FunctionType
  {
      const char *name;
      void *func;
  };
  
  static const struct FunctionType functions[] =
  {
      { "func", GetFullPathName },
  };
  
  typedef DWORD (WINAPI *GetPathFunc)(LPCSTR, DWORD, LPSTR, LPSTR *);
  
  int main(int argc, char *argv[])
  {
      char buf[256];
      GetPathFunc f = (GetPathFunc)functions[0].func;
  
      if (f != GetFullPathName) {
  
          puts("Invalid ptr");
  
      } else {
  
          if (f(argv[0], sizeof(buf), buf, NULL) > 0) {
  
              puts(buf);
          }
      }
  
      return (0);
  }
  

  Hello hglee,.

  Your code looks fine. I filed the bug report #423480 to follow up the matter.

  Our new compiler important GetFullPathName of inconsistently. The main function, it refers directly to the implementation in the kernel32.dll module. In the static variable, it designates the pointer 'import' for the function (a pointer to the implementation). Interestingly, in CVI 2012 refers us to the 'import stub' in both cases (a jump through the pointer to the implementation).

  As a temporary workaround, you can manually cancel the extra level of indirection by changing a single line in your code:

     GetPathFunc f = *(GetPathFunc*)functions[0].func;
  

  However, it is DANGEROUS because, depending on how we decide how solve the problem, the workaround solution can become a bug itself in the future, and it may crash your program. So please keep that in mind when you change your code (for example, add a comment and a link to this post to remind you).

  Thank you

  Peter

• CVI 2013 SP1 - function calls repeated with pointer on a variable array parameter causes a shift of the index

  I have some functions will be pointers as parameter and CVI 2012 SP1, they work as before without problems but with CVI 2013 SP1 they are now incorrect.

  Here the description of what is happening - I found a cure, but a duty adopt the old code and I think it's clear that nobody don't "captures" all lines in a 'big old code' which are affected (maybe):

  I have functions

  'function_XYZ(int *p_paraArr) '.

  with 'p_paraArr' as pointers on a table (int).

  Suppose I have another function

  "fct_TOP (void)".

  where is a local array variable which is inizialized by

  "int TheArray [25] = {0};

  and inside of this "TOP"-function-body I call a function ".

  "function_XYZ (TheArray).

  There are no complains of the compiler (CVI 2012 or 2013) and the code works (but the CVI 2013 only once!).

  But if I put 'fct_TOP' loop I have a lag in the "TheArray' -memory.  (The loop surrounds the function "TOP"! "")

  This means that the result "TheArray" obtained from "function_XYZ (TheArray)" starts at index '1' not on the index '0' - as the first time that the function "function_XYZ (TheArray)" was performed. ".

  The solution is:

  I only replaced

  "function_XYZ (TheArray)" (<1>)

  by

  "function_XYZ (&(TheArray[0]))" (<2>)

  overall the program now works every time (in the whole loop)-the first time (in the loop).

  In the second version (<2>) everything is necessary to "work well":

  The '&' and parentheses "(...)", which contains the element that may be designated by the '& '.

  And I hope that you believe me: I've tested several times, it was only "little" change that solved the problem.

  So it seems that the ICB 2013 (SP1) is a kind of internal offset index by a repeated execution of the

  "function_XYZ (TheArray).

  but I don't know how or why but I see in debug mode by observing the expected against the values in the table received!

  At the first time the (implicit) internal index of 'TheArray' is '0', but the following times (during the execution of the loop) the internal index passes to '1' (seen in the debugger because that all the expected values were shiftet like that!).

  So there's an explicit index in the table ("function_XYZ (&(TheArray[0]))") necessary to make the first time of this clear code execution.

  There are some good improvements in 2013 CVI (SP1) and I like this environment more than the 2012 version - but:

  There are other "changes" also, in the compiler (or linker...?) that are more rigid than "in ancient times.

  The problem of this kind of error is always the 'old code '!

  It is expected of such behavior.

  The compiler/linker do not complain (a complaint would be good!) writing but he made this mistake (in a loop).

  By the way: my 'compilation Options' are set to 'Extended' (without change in the "..." ("- button - Options) and that all of the boxes, except the" OpenMP_support "-box are checked!"» So I think that I put the very rigid compiler - maybe there are some «...» ' - button - settings to get rid of this problem, but I have not found them/it.

  My request:

  -Check the stiffer compiler by the need of an explicit index

  - or switch to the 'old' behavior with "function_XYZ (TheArray)" always refers to implicit index '0' of the element "TheArray". "."

  Thank you for your messages, comments and suggestions.

  -As I wrote before - maybe it's the style of programming or error"self made"... maybe...
  .. But if I replace 'function_XYZ (TheArray)' by "function_XYZ (&(TheArray[0]))" and
  then it works... Why so and not, if bothe the same? ...

  But as long as I do not post sample code, nobody is going to accept - I accept it. So consider this post more as an allusion to the fact that of the LW/CVI 2012-2013 LW/CVI more changed than just the LW - GUI or certain features: the compiler changed its 'way to'... or almost.

  For this problem, I think that I will use the solution 'use no implicit and explicit pointers'.
  Who should be a good idea taking into account
      http://forums.NI.com/T5/LabWindows-CVI/fatal-run-time-error-dereference-of-out-of-bounds-pointer/TD-...

  mybe also only caused by wrong code... who knows... but for me it is a sufficient reason to act as I suggest above.

  Best regards,
  F.

• Mini iPad will never get the 10 iOS update? Many updates, I need applications require this.

  I am owner of a mini iPad, and many of my applications require updates requiring a 10 iOS. I would like to know if the iPad mini will never get iOS 10. Please help me!

  Sorry, no.

  http://osxdaily.com/2016/06/14/iOS-10-compatibility-list/

• Will be Firefox for android get firefox Hello? Or will never happen because telefonica is not interested to have in firefox for android?

  Firefox for android will get firefox Hello and when? Or will never happen because telefonica is not interested to have in firefox for android?
  Hello, Firefox is the right thing and it would be much larger if it is available on android for direct use from phone to phone.

  I don't have an ETA for you, but it is spoken, here is a list of bugs to integrate the UX, etc.:

  • https://Bugzilla.Mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?QuickSearch=Hello+Androi...

• Firefox has detected that the server redirects the request for this address in a way that will never end.

  This week (01/10/12) I registered on youtube and now I can't log back in here or in my gmail account. I tried every fix-it/single remedy offered the FF forum but nothing works.

  Any other work, all the sites that I frequent load fine, is youtube doing something on purpose for FF users? I can get the page youtube videos and see, but I can't log on, every time I click the sign in button, I get:

  "The page is not redirecting properly".

  Firefox has detected that the server is redirecting the request for this address in a way that will never complete.
  

  This problem can sometimes be caused by disabling or refusing to accept cookies. »

  I hate to be a conspiracy theorist, I can connect to youtube without problem on IE, but I hate this browser. I use windows 7 and 15 FF. Can someone find it?

  Looks like it's a firefox issue, because that never happened on IE, Safari or Opera on me.
  You think not that a simple patch can solve this problem. I have to delete individual cookies every day.

• Firefox has detectedthe server redirects the request to an address in a way that will never end

  Firefox has detected that the server redirects the request for this address in a way that will never end it is verbatim it's never happened before

  We have the same problem. Ours is a little out of the ordinary that we have a web application that displays pages based on a configuration of a database for the "namesake" page is created over and over again that our users make their way through our investigations.

  Is there a method on the side Server things, what can be done to stop this error from appearing? We tried some experiments as alternating in the title of the page, redirect between two different pages but FF still think it is to see the same page over and over again.

  We would love to be able to support FF for our clients and their customers (those who take our surveys) and it is a crucial issue at the moment for some of our customers worldwide.

  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Thank you
  ~ Dave Carr
  800, Inc. service.
  [email protected]

• I uninstalled Firefox 7 because it was not compatible with the Yahoo toolbar. They will never fix this? I need my Yahoo.

  I've upgraded to Firefox 7, but it is not compatible with the Yahoo toolbar. I uninstalled my previous Firefox back. They will never fix the Yahoo toolbar addon?

  Why not ask Yahoo? It's their toolbar.

• Firefox has detected that the server redirects the request for this address in a way that will never end. I followed your instructions and nothing works. This just started happening today.

  I was watching www.ustream.tv/decoraheagles for months. I started using Firefox about a month ago. Earlier today, when I tried connecting to the site, I received the message "Firefox has detected that the server redirects the request for this address in a way that will never end."
  I went on your site and follow the instructions. This Web site was not in the blocked sites. He told me how to add it, and I did.
  She still refuses to open this site.
  Internet Explorer WILL open this site.

  Clear the cache and cookies from sites that cause problems.

  "Clear the Cache":

  • Tools > Options > advanced > network > storage (Cache) offline: 'clear now '.

  'Delete Cookies' sites causing problems:

  • Tools > Options > privacy > Cookies: "show the Cookies".
  • http://KB.mozillazine.org/The_page_is_not_redirecting_properly