CVI execution Profiler appears (necessary registry cleaning method)

Similar Questions

• CVI execution Profiler - overhead DLL

  Hello

  I use the CVI execution Profiler toolkit to analyze system performance when one implicitly that linked DLL is called from an exe application.

  It appears that many statistics that the component time % for the exported DLL function is roughly half of the total time for the component.

  For example (with "dll_function" selected in profile):

  + exe_function

  -50% dll_function

  DebugPrintf 48%

  OtherFunction 2%

  Would this coorelate time with an overload of the call of the DLL?

  Thanks for any help regarding this.

  jharris66,

  I think that might be a safe assumption, but given that I don't see the same behavior on my system, I can't confirm if it's because your DLL is more complex than mine or because something else contributes to the synchronization. Would it not possible to see a screenshot of the Profiler and code in your DLL function?

• Execution Profiler causes error after that it is disabled.

  Hi all

  I have a set of software that we use the CVI execution Profiler with.  I built the version with profiling enabled in the build options which also added the merge module in the build (see CVIProfilerMergeModule.jpg).  I got what I needed the profile tool, but now I can't seem to turn it off.

  I disabled in the code and the build for the project options and I deleted all of the software OR of the target machine (including the manual removal of the dll cviauto.dll and duration of the windows/system32 folder).  And yet whenever I have installed my new, disabled Profiler, construction, I get the error seen in ProfileError.jpg on start up.  How can I get rid of this?

  Thank you

  Judy

  The error indicates that the Profiler calls code in your program, but the Profiler is not installed. Make sure that you rebuild your CVI program and all CVI DLLs you call with disabled profiling. To make sure you really all rebuild, mark all the source files for recompilation and then build. If not, remove the cvibuild directory and then build. If you have any instrument (.fp) files or files .obj or .lib in your project, make sure that they are also recompiled - remove the .obj and .lib files and make sure that ICB RECOMPILE their source. If you relink only the project without recompile all the source files, you have to the object code who is callling the Profiler.

• Is it necessary to have a registry cleaner?

  I currently have Max Registry Cleaner on my PC.

  However, brief conversations with various friends and computer specialists, over the past months, I have the impression that they seem to think having a Registry Cleaner is a waste of space on a computer and is not necessary.

  Can you give me some advice on this, please?

  I currently have Max Registry Cleaner on my PC.

  However, brief conversations with various friends and computer specialists, over the past months, I have the impression that they seem to think having a Registry Cleaner is a waste of space on a computer and is not necessary.

  Can you give me some advice on this, please?

  It is much worse than "not necessary." It's a very dangerous thing to do.

  Registry cleaning programs are * all * snake oil. The registry cleaning is not necessary and dangerous. Let alone register and do not use any registry cleaner. Despite what many people think, and what software record cleaning providers are trying to you convince to have used the registry entries is not really make you hurt.

  The risk of a serious problem caused by a registry cleaner by mistake delete an entry you need is much greater than any potential benefit it may have.

  Read http://www.edbott.com/weblog/archives/000643.html

  and http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?t=28099

  and also http://blogs.technet.com/markrussinovich/archive/2005/10/02/registry-junk-a-windows-fact-of-life.aspx

  Let me stress that neither me nor anyone else who warns against the use of registry cleaners has never said that they always cause problems. If they have always caused problems, they would disappear from the market almost immediately. Many people have used a registry cleaner and never had a problem with it.

  The problem with a registry cleaner is that it carries with it the essential * risk * to have a problem. And since there is no advantage to using a registry cleaner, running the risk is a very bad deal.

• Mouse does not work after registry clean and...

  I've heard that registry cleaning programs are not always good but did not have a lot of problems so far. Recently made one and mouse stopped working. His connect older not USB one. The keyboard still works, but not the mouse. The mouse still light inside too. I had for some reason at random to chance, he works at a startup, but not since. I need to get this problem that I have a big problem with BSOD but can't fight this problem until this problem is corrected. Tried, but some cases need the mouse.

  AMD Athlon 6000 + Dual Core Vista 32 HP Pavillion WMC

  Friday, October 15, 2010, 14:03:55 + 0000, sRecollet wrote:

  I heard that registry cleaning programs are not always good

  It is not that they are not always good, is that they are never
  good.

  but have not had a lot of problems so far. Recently made one and mouse stopped working. His connect older not USB one. The keyboard still works, but not the mouse. The mouse still light inside too. I had for some reason at random to chance, he works at a startup, but not since. I need to get this problem that I have a big problem with BSOD but can't fight this problem until this problem is corrected. Tried, but some cases need the mouse.

  Your registry cleaner allows you to make a backup? If so, use it.
  If this is not the case, do a system restore to the date before the execution of the registry
  cleaner.

  Here is my standard message on the subject:

  Registry cleaning programs are all snake oil. Cleaning of the
  registration is not necessary and is dangerous. Let alone register and
  do not use any registry cleaner. Despite what many people think, and
  What software record cleaning suppliers are trying to convince you,
  have unused registry entries is not really make you hurt.
  The risk of a serious problem caused by a registry cleaner by mistake
  delete an entry you need is much greater than any potential benefit
  It can have.
  Read http://www.edbott.com/weblog/archives/000643.html

  and http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?t=28099

  and also
  http://blogs.technet.com/markrussinovich/Archive/2005/10/02/registry-junk-a-Windows-fact-of-life.aspx

  Let me stress that neither me nor anyone else who warns the
  use of registry cleaners never said that they always cause
  problems. If they have always caused problems, they would disappear from
  the market almost immediately. Many people have used a registry
  cleaner and never had a problem with it.

  The problem with a registry cleaner is that it carries with it
  the risk of a significant problem. And since there is no
  benefits of using a registry cleaner, running that risk is a very bad
  good deal.

  Ken Blake (MS-MVP)

• is there a registry cleaner free

  Is there a registry cleaner free of Microsoft?

  It has been/is a registry cleaner in Windows Live One Care safety analysis.

  Years, they released a product called RegClean 4 which was necessary to maintain the size of the registry, Win 9 x small enough so that it wouldn't crash the machine. He never removed the safer of the entries, and I guess that the OneCare registry cleaner works in the same direction.

  There are three types of registry cleaner.

  Type #1 does nothing but remove safer entries and has therefore no impact on performance.

  Note that the OneCare cleaner registry is just one part of a major clean-up operation and is not sold as the main element ' go faster '...

  #2 type removes entries more safe but also other flags entered as potential candidates for removal. This type can remove some features because it offers choices that cannot be fully understood by the user of the computer.

  #3 type promises realization just as it was when you were first of all the computer, but this is because the user must run the 'back to the factory' procedure to recover a work computer. In a perverse way, the statements are true, but the method to get '' there '' makes nothing better than scams.

  Microsoft is aware that the register used by Windows 2000 and all derivatives since actually ignore the orphan entries, and the maximum size of the registry is well above what any user could get it.

  If Windows 2000 > registry Gets a big enough mistake, you never get the chance to use a registry cleaner because Windows does not start in any case. Manual registry and reconstruction removal, it is not always successful of success and the amount of commands must be typed exactly, or there is a risk of worse... not that it can do a lot worse than a computer that does not start in the mode of... (-:

  Microsoft also knows what a registry cleaner used on Windows 2000 > can improve performance when used as the only tool.

  To this day, I don't understand why Microsoft never included a registry cleaner in the OnerCare package. All it does is keep the living myth that registry cleaners have value, opening the door to every registry scam cleaner...

  It is best to avoid contact with the registry cleaners.

• ARO 2013 Registry Cleaner do I need this?

  I just got an email about the product above do I really need this?

  Hello

  Cleaners registry, System optimizers and programs too much hype like them don't fix anything
  and will stop most of the time. Look at those who, as powder of snake oil and avoid.

  Registry cleaners are needed?
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/are-registry-cleaners-necessary#1TC=Windows-7

  Support lifecycle for the use of the registry cleaning utilities
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/2563254

  If you have problems with the system, then post a message about it in these forums.

  I hope this helps.

  Rob Brown - Microsoft MVP<- profile="" -="" windows="" expert="" -="" consumer="" :="" bicycle="" -="" mark="" twain="" said="" it="">

• Microsoft has a registry cleaner?

  Original title: registry cleaners

  Microsoft has a registry cleaner?  Also is it necessary to use a registry cleaner?

  The game, 18 November 2010 16:28:55 + 0000, Gigiou wrote:

  Microsoft has a registry cleaner?

  N °

  Also is it necessary to use a registry cleaner?

  Not only is # not necessary, that's a very bad thing to do.

  Registry cleaning programs are all snake oil. Cleaning of the
  registration is not necessary and is dangerous. Let alone register and
  do not use any registry cleaner. Despite what many people think, and
  What software record cleaning suppliers are trying to convince you,
  have unused registry entries is not really make you hurt.
  The risk of a serious problem caused by a registry cleaner by mistake
  delete an entry you need is much greater than any potential benefit
  It can have.
  Read http://www.edbott.com/weblog/archives/000643.html

  and http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?t=28099

  and also
  http://blogs.technet.com/markrussinovich/Archive/2005/10/02/registry-junk-a-Windows-fact-of-life.aspx

  Let me stress that neither me nor anyone else who warns the
  use of registry cleaners never said that they always cause
  problems. If they have always caused problems, they would disappear from
  the market almost immediately. Many people have used a registry
  cleaner and never had a problem with it.

  The problem with a registry cleaner is that it carries with it
  the risk of a significant problem. And since there is no
  benefits of using a registry cleaner, running that risk is a very bad
  good deal.

  Ken Blake (MS-MVP)

• What is the best way to correct the registry errors without the use of a registry cleaner in XP?

  I am sorry to raise this issue that so many people who have asked me.  I read pages and pages of discussions on the MS forum on this subject, and without exception, all the experts said Microsoft registry cleaners are completely unnecessary and that junk in the registers has no performance impact at all.  Instead, they say, to do x, y and z.  I am running Windows XP on my desk for five years, and gradually, he got so slow it's almost unbearable.  It takes 10-15 minutes just to start, and sometimes it takes 2 minutes or more just to open a window of browser (IE8) or go to the previous page by using the arrow to the left.  Before you tell me all the things it could be, please let me say that:

  1. my PC has not always been this slow!  It is getting worse.

  2. all my Windows software is up to date.  I have automatic updates on.

  3. I have a lot of disk space, almost 75% of free space on a hard drive of 80 GB.

  4. my PC is free of viruses, spyware and Trojans.  I have McAfee antivirus running and I also sometimes run Malwarebytes and Trojan Killer, because they always find things that don't have McAfee.

  5. I defragment my hard drive on a regular basis.

  6. I regularly delete all my temporary files by using the Windows Disk Cleanup utility.

  7. I have very little, if any "Add-ons".  No toolbar Yahoo or Google (or Bing!).

  8. I removed nearly every program that I start, so that they are not running in the background.

  9. I uninstalled all the programs that I don't use.

  However, I still have a slow ever-more computer.  Sometimes, when I see ads on TV to increase the speed of my PC, I download the 'free' software, and they claim to find hundreds or thousands of "registry errors.  When I look at the newspapers, I see many entries in registry for 'Netscape' and 'Google Earth', which I uninstalled years ago, as well as entries for the videos that I downloaded, seen once, and deleted a long time ago.

  So, what's the problem?  If it's not related to my registry (which Trojan Killer says has more 6 000 entries!), what else could be?  I would appreciate greatly any advice you can give, because there are dozens of companies on their touting their registry cleaners and the uninstall (for a price) programs, and after reading reviews of the MS MVPs, I'm skeptical of their claims.  Thank you.  :)

  I can't disagree with a lot of things have already been said.

  I'm willing to accept that your machine does actually takes 10 to 15 minutes on the clock. It's completely absurd.

  Some people call your "Windows Rot" problem. Becomes just the slower windows over time. It is a collection of things that are happening in the background. Yes I believe that the register contributes. Using a registry cleaner is not a "magic" solution But it can help a little.

  The PC care program/process you described is above average.  I suggest you add CCleaner. Disk Cleanup is not bad, CCleaner is better, cleaning of other stuff which does not resemble the DC. It won't be a significant difference because disk space is not your problem, but it will help a little.

  'Play' with the registry is VERY risky. If you decide to go ahead, I would say that first make you a copy of the full image backup using a utility that can be started and run from a CD/DVD. Just in case the registry cleaner breaks of your machine.

  Registry cleaners is that they take a "best estimate" to what is no longer necessary. Sometimes they think wrong. And each vacuum cleaner will clean slightly different sets of places.  If the tool does not provide a way to back up the registry before you start cleaning, do not use it. He is not careful enough.

  If vacuuming offer 'levels' of cleaning, enjoy. Open for more aggressive cleaning, with resetting and long series of normal use between cleanings.

  You are looking for a tool which also makes registry "defragmentation". The registry is a database that get disorganized by additions and deletions. Defragmentation will be re - organize and get rid of a 'lost' space, making it the smallest file, afterwards faster to read.  It is not something you need to do frequently, but since you've never done it in 5 years, it would help, after cleaning registry.

  Another place to find CPU and RAM wasted resources is Windows Services. These are small programs that start at boot time. They run in the background and provide support services to all applications or specific applications.  Many applications services are running even though you don't really need them. You can find information on which you can set by Googling for 'Windows XP hardening'. There are a lot of sites with good information. They call it hardening because by disabling unnecessary stuff, you leave less possible openings for the "bad guys" to the attack.

  Ultimately, I think your best bet will simply bite the bullet and re - install windows and all your applications. It's the best way to restore your computer to almost any performance fees factory. (It is not exactly factory fresh because you need to add a ton of Windows updates).

  Before you re-install, do copy image 1 or more full backups. At least one must be done using a tool that will easily allow you to extract the files. You data backup files separately to make it easier to restore the reinstallation. IE, copy it to a USB key.

  Many "experts" actually expect to, and do, re - install windows every 6-12 months!  I think it's a bit exaggerated, but they swear by it.

  Once you do your re - install, create a copy of the magnified image
  Install a firewall application (before the windows updates)
  Once you do all updates of windows, create a copy of the magnified image
  After that you re-install all your apps, create another copy of the complete picture.

  In this way, in the future, you have more current points to restore your computer to. It will reduce the time you spend to get back to the current configuration.

  On a 5 year old XP machine, you have probably 512 MB - 1 GB of RAM. You might also consider taking in the shop (or DIY) and bump the RAM up to at least 2 GB or better still max out.  The current versions of the applications use much more memory than they did 5 years ago. Even XP will be since he has been seriously corrected since then.

• Disk defragmentation repeated after you install a Registry Cleaner program.

  Original title: Disk Defragmenter

  Hello.

  I use Windows XP Prof and IE 8.

  "After" install a Registry Cleaner program, a disk defragmentation task was executed, and he indicated that the volume needs to be defragmented. Subsequently, the task of disk defragmentation was performed again and he said that 'always' volume must be defragmented even if there is nothing to defragment (no red line showing).

  'Before' installing the program Registry Cleaner, disk defragmentation task was performed and she would declare that the volume needs to be defragmented. Subsequently, the task of disk defragmentation was performed again and he said that the volume was already defragmented (no red line showing).

  Why the registry cleaner would lead the program Defragmenter to 'think' that he needs to defragment even after this has been done (and no red line showing)?

  Thanks in advance.

  I will not bore to 'clear all' regularly because I can see the red error icon and the yellow warning icon clearly by scroll.

  Bottom line: Defrag works so I will continue to "analyze" and defragment every day when there are red lines in the graph, but not worthwhile to defragment a second time, unless the red lines still appear.

  Thank you 'a lot' to work on this issue with me - It is much appreciated.

• Registry cleaner

  Windows XP Service Pack 3 - my machine is 10 years old and I am interested in a registry cleaner, you know a reputable free software to download?

  Windows XP Service Pack 3 - my machine is 10 years old and I am interested in a registry cleaner, you know a reputable free software to download?

  Stay away from * all * the registry cleaners.

  Registry cleaning programs are * all * snake oil. The registry cleaning is not necessary and dangerous. Let alone register and do not use any registry cleaner. Despite what many people think, and what software record cleaning providers are trying to you convince to have used the registry entries is not really make you hurt.

  The risk of a serious problem caused by a registry cleaner by mistake delete an entry you need is much greater than any potential benefit it may have.

  Read http://www.edbott.com/weblog/archives/000643.html

  and http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?t=28099

  and also http://blogs.technet.com/markrussinovich/archive/2005/10/02/registry-junk-a-windows-fact-of-life.aspx

  Let me stress that neither me nor anyone else who warns against the use of registry cleaners has never said that they always cause problems. If they have always caused problems, they would disappear from the market almost immediately. Many people have used a registry cleaner and never had a problem with it.

  The problem with a registry cleaner is that it carries with it the essential * risk * to have a problem. And since there is no advantage to using a registry cleaner, running the risk is a very bad deal.

• I have Microsift Essentials, but do I need a registry cleaner also

  I don't know if Microsoft Essentials is also a record. I don't know a lot about the registry, but asked me to buy one after that I ran the free scan. The analysis said that I had more than 100 errors. I don't know if they are just trying to sell me something I don't need it or not.

  I searched the Microsoft site but did not find anything as a registry cleaner.

  I don't know if Microsoft Essentials is also a record. I don't know a lot about the registry, but asked me to buy one after that I ran the free scan. The analysis said that I had more than 100 errors. I don't know if they are just trying to sell me something I don't need it or not.

  I searched the Microsoft site but did not find anything as a registry cleaner.

  You say Microsoft Essentials. Do you mean Microsoft J.4 Essentials or something else? Where do you have it?

  Microsoft Security Essentials is an excellent anti-virus software, but he's not trying to sell you anything. What you describe looks like you are infected by a malware program trying to sell you something.

  For a registry cleaner, only don't you think * need * one, you should avoid them like the plague. Registry cleaning programs are * all * snake oil. The registry cleaning is not necessary and dangerous. Let alone register and do not use any registry cleaner. Despite what many people think, and what software record cleaning providers are trying to you convince to have used the registry entries is not really make you hurt.

  The risk of a serious problem caused by a registry cleaner by mistake delete an entry you need is much greater than any potential benefit it may have.

  Read http://www.edbott.com/weblog/archives/000643.html

  and http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?t=28099

  and also http://blogs.technet.com/markrussinovich/archive/2005/10/02/registry-junk-a-windows-fact-of-life.aspx

  Let me stress that neither me nor anyone else who warns against the use of registry cleaners has never said that they always cause problems. If they have always caused problems, they would disappear from the market almost immediately. Many people have used a registry cleaner and never had a problem with it.

  The problem with a registry cleaner is that it carries with it the essential * risk * to have a problem. And since there is no advantage to using a registry cleaner, running the risk is a very bad deal.

• Eusing Registry Cleaner find same invalid key each scan even after repair.

  Here are the keys that are not valid:
  OK so I have a problem with my registry, when I use Eusing Free Registry Cleaner software he always finds the word registry keys and another key to windows as not valid, the problem is that are the infected with a virus or something? If not, is there a way I can set the keys, because when I click Repair on the program he always appears after a new analysis? Please help me as soon as possible. Thank you!

  Invalid file or folder # HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Speech\Recognizers\Tokens\MS-1033-80-DESK\Models\1033\L1033\ # %windir%\Speech\Engines\SR\en-US\L1033
  Invalid file or folder # HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Speech\Recognizers\Tokens\MS-1033-80-DESK\Models\1033\L1033\AMs\AF031033 # %windir%\Speech\Engines\SR\en-US\af031033
  Invalid file or folder # HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Speech\Recognizers\Tokens\MS-1033-80-DESK\Models\1033\L1033\AMs\AI031033 # %windir%\Speech\Engines\SR\en-US\ai031033
  Invalid file or folder # HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Speech\Recognizers\Tokens\MS-1033-80-DESK\Models\1033\L1033\AMs\AM031033 # %windir%\Speech\Engines\SR\en-US\am031033
  Invalid file or folder # HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Speech\Recognizers\Tokens\MS-1033-80-DESK\Models\1033\L1033\LMs\Main\ # %windir%\Speech\Engines\SR\en-US\L1033
  Invalid file or folder # HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Speech\Recognizers\Tokens\MS-1033-80-DESK\Models\1033\L1033\LMs\Main\Pronunciation # %windir%\Speech\Engines\SR\en-US\p1033
  Invalid file or folder # HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Speech\Recognizers\Tokens\MS-1033-80-DESK\Models\1033\L1033\LMs\Main\Spelling # %windir%\Speech\Engines\SR\en-US\s1033
  Invalid file or folder # HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Speech\Recognizers\Tokens\MS-1033-80-DESK\Models\1033\L1033\LMs\Main\URL # %windir%\Speech\Engines\SR\en-US\u1033
  Invalid file or folder # HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Speech\Recognizers\Tokens\MS-1033-80-DESK\Models\1033\L1033\LMs\Main\HowDoI # %windir%\Speech\Engines\SR\en-US\t1033
  Invalid file or folder # HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Speech\Recognizers\Tokens\MS-2057-80-DESK\Models\2057\L2057\ # %windir%\Speech\Engines\SR\en-GB\L2057
  Invalid file or folder # HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Speech\Recognizers\Tokens\MS-2057-80-DESK\Models\2057\L2057\AMs\AF032057 # %windir%\Speech\Engines\SR\en-GB\af032057
  Invalid file or folder # HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Speech\Recognizers\Tokens\MS-2057-80-DESK\Models\2057\L2057\AMs\AI032057 # %windir%\Speech\Engines\SR\en-GB\ai032057
  Invalid file or folder # HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Speech\Recognizers\Tokens\MS-2057-80-DESK\Models\2057\L2057\AMs\AM032057 # %windir%\Speech\Engines\SR\en-GB\am032057
  Invalid file or folder # HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Speech\Recognizers\Tokens\MS-2057-80-DESK\Models\2057\L2057\LMs\Main\ # %windir%\Speech\Engines\SR\en-GB\L2057
  Invalid file or folder # HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Speech\Recognizers\Tokens\MS-2057-80-DESK\Models\2057\L2057\LMs\Main\Pronunciation # %windir%\Speech\Engines\SR\en-GB\p2057
  Invalid file or folder # HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Speech\Recognizers\Tokens\MS-2057-80-DESK\Models\2057\L2057\LMs\Main\Spelling # %windir%\Speech\Engines\SR\en-GB\s2057
  Invalid file or folder # HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\IME\China\imesc\Directories\InstallDir # %SystemRoot%\IME\IMESC

  the # are here just for spaces.

  Essentially if you used a registry cleaner and it has an undo feature you should use and uninstall the program. I not worry - or do whatever it is - on the registry entries found by a registry cleaner. Even if you have some additional registry entries, they will not affect how Windows XP/Vista/7 to perform a strand. MS - MVP - Elephant Boy computers - don't panic!

• "Unable to make the system restore point", when I ran registry cleaner Norton

  I just installed Norton 360 on the desktop with Windows Vista Home Premium OS. When I ran the registry cleaner, the error message appeared saying: "Unable to do the system restore point" . I contacted Norton, but they said it's nothing to do with Norton, I need to contact Microsoft. In addition, as suggested in one of your responces, I tried to create manually restore point, but I don't see the system protection tab on my system properties pop-up screen.

  I just installed Norton 360 on the desktop with Windows Vista Home Premium OS. When I ran the registry cleaner, the error message appeared saying: "Unable to do the system restore point" . I contacted Norton, but they said it's nothing to do with Norton, I need to contact Microsoft. In addition, as suggested in one of your responces, I tried to create manually restore point, but I don't see the system protection tab on my system properties pop-up screen.

  I don't know what prompted to run registry cleaner. I would sincerely say that you read the following article first before you take back this terrible task to play with the registry.
  Why you should not run registry cleaner:
  http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=643

  Here is the tutorial on how to create a system restore point:
  http://www.Vistax64.com/tutorials/76332-system-restore-point-create.html

  t-4-2

• Windows defender error on startup and registry cleaner displays errors

  Original title: defender of windows Vista

  gDay hope some1 can help me with windows defender on vista im no good with computers, I get error message evrytime iturn on I have norton aswell ive only run the two together bfore no worries I've been online and regwork told me I have a problem I have download they scan tell me ive got 2000 a weird errors, they don't fix the probs and now ive got pumpn migraine cos ive got lots of probs but beginning it with windefender and I can't uninstall regwork he finds not parrametrs something like that for now I just want to advocate work again can some1 please help

  Saturday, January 22, 2011, 20:50:14 + 0000, skozzi76 wrote:

  gDay hope some1 can help me with windows defender on vista im no good with computers, I get error message evrytime iturn on I have norton aswell ive only run the two together bfore no worries I've been online and regwork told me I have a problem I have download they scan tell me ive got 2000 a weird errors, they don't fix the probs and now ive got pumpn migraine cos ive got lots of probs but beginning it with windefender and I can't uninstall regwork he finds not parrametrs something like that for now I just want to advocate work again can some1 please help

  Regwork is a registry cleaner?

  I highly recommend that you do not run and that throw you.

  Registry cleaning programs are all snake oil. Cleaning of the
  registration is not necessary and is dangerous. Let alone register and
  do not use any registry cleaner. Despite what many people think, and
  What software record cleaning suppliers are trying to convince you,
  have unused registry entries is not really make you hurt.
  The risk of a serious problem caused by a registry cleaner by mistake
  delete an entry you need is much greater than any potential benefit
  It can have.
  Read http://www.edbott.com/weblog/archives/000643.html

  and http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?t=28099

  and also
  http://blogs.technet.com/markrussinovich/Archive/2005/10/02/registry-junk-a-Windows-fact-of-life.aspx

  Let me stress that neither me nor anyone else who warns the
  use of registry cleaners never said that they always cause
  problems. If they have always caused problems, they would disappear from
  the market almost immediately. Many people have used a registry
  cleaner and never had a problem with it.

  The problem with a registry cleaner is that it carries with it
  the risk of a significant problem. And since there is no
  benefits of using a registry cleaner, running that risk is a very bad
  good deal.

  Ken Blake (MS-MVP)