Degradation in speed WRT610N

Similar Questions

• Degraded RAID 1 array: PowerEdge 2800

  Hello to everyone. I hope someone can shed some light on this unusual situation.

  I have a PowerEdge 2800, which must be replaced before May this year, this is a great server and done an excellent job over the past 7 years.

  OK for the problem; The server administrator has been a failure on 0:0

  In the server, we have:

  0: Maxtor 36 GB 15 k 0 0:1 Fujitsu 73 GB 15 k something 1:2... 1:3 something...

  So, I jumped 0:0 and the server worked great with a range of gradations, and 15 seconds I inserted back to the PE2800. After about 45 minutes the RAID 1 array has been rebuilt, but it still says expected failure. So I thought that better order some new readers - I received today; 2 x 146 GB 15 k Seagate Cheetah.

  OK, so I jumped 0:0 drive and inserted one of the 146 GB Cheetah and the server crashed - wouldn't boot at all and gave me an error stating that the logical drive failed.

  Thus, in the PERC4i BIOS, I forced drive 0:1 online and the server is now back operational but with a range of gradations.

  So that's where I am, what choice do I have?

  Insert the old disk with a predicted failure, leave it alone or try the 146 GB Cheetah. I don't really want to do an any of them, but I will order another 73 GB Fujitsu in the meantime.

  I want to know is why the server crash after having inserted the cheetah disc? I traded to many-a-time pluggable hard drives in the past in several dell breaks and never experienced anything like this.

  Degraded running, any response would be massively appreciated.

  Thank you very much.

  "So, I'm now to square, where I have a RAID1 system with a disk failure planned.  What would you do from here on? »

  Another thing that many people do not know is with a disk of pf, should it be forced offline before replacing, if not the FP flag can be assigned to the new drive (until a real "rescan" is performed) and can result in strange behavior (the controller is more sensitive to potential readers of pf failure).

  "Common sense says I can't mix-match 10 k / 15 k TPM!

  You CAN / layout speeds and/or sizes (there's nothing wrong with him "technically"), but in real-world scenarios, you would ever want to mix speeds (depending on the configuration, it degrade the speed of the whole picture).  One thing you can't do is mix U320 SCSI U160 readers on a bottom of basket/controller.

  "What would you do from here on?

  I guess from here depends on what you feel more comfortable making.  There is a chance that the pf reader works fine until you are finished with the server (or until you can get another replacement - if you feel another replacement would be better than those you currently have), even if it might cause additional problems if his condition deteriorates.  There is a chance it could happen again if you try to replace it, but I think it's unlikely to happen.  If it was me (and it is important to remember that this isn't :)), I force disk 0 offline and replace "hot" by the other 146 GB drive.  Another thing you could do, who feel probably less risky, is simply to insert the disc of 146 GB in an open slot, assign as a relief, then force offline disk 0, which results in a regeneration start automatically with disk 0.

• Very slow start and run for Dell Inspiron 6400 XP times

  "I have a problem with an Inspiron 6400 brought to ' horribly slow start and run time.  XP Pro 32 bit SP3 patched up to date.  Cleaned up a lot of "undesirable", as the partially uninstalled programs, cleaned the files temporary etc. with CCleaner, cleaned and optimized the registry afer all the cleaning has been done, defragmented, tried to start without any of the boot files, disabled all unnecessary services and uninstalled virus checking software, (but ran several anti-virus controls) etc. - no help.   Safe Start Mode is faster, but... not at all normal - 1 1/2 minutes of screen to logon instead of close to 3 minutes.  A lot of memory (2 GB), which rises to 600 to 700 MB runnng all the stuff I've tried.  Hard drive is 1/3 used out of 120 GB with a 2 GB swap file.

  One thing I'm still scratching my head over - beyond the horribly slow boot - is very slow access to files even though everything seems to work normally, but as molasses in January.  Looking at the performance of the Task Manager tab when I run a copy of a file (whether via a cmd window or with Windows Explorer), I see a near max processor would be and the other with a small business.  Even if the customer says he had been getting worse for some time, after checking and cleaning of all things 'normal', my next thought was perhaps a bad disk or disk controller driver, but chkdsk ran very well (although it took hours) even if I ' d I have already updated all drivers (and even the DVD firmware and BIOS) on the Dell web site.  Oh, and I ran Dell Diagnostics (from bootable CD) updates all with no errors found.  And access to the slow file even with symptoms had max-processor occur with a copy of the file on a USB key that seems to eliminiate the hard disk, the disk controller and the pilot.

  The other interesting part of the display for a file copy task manager is that the processes tab simply shows System Idle 97 to 99%, with a percentage of casual for other processes as Explorer while I see 1 max out procesor on the performance tab.  That the same copy on your desktop shows 3-4% of the CPU usage and who is with active antivirus software.  I'm almost ready to fall toward a Windows reinstall, but would like to find the real reason behind this problem of puzzle...

  It of almost as if he's using PIO instead of DMA disk access, but... don't know how/where to test this.

  Look at:

  http://Windows-XP-tricks.com/direct-memory-access-DMA-on-IDE-hard-drive.php

  and

  http://winhlp.com/node/10

  Solved!   Thanks for the links, especially to each other.  An old but still a goodie!

  For those who have enquring spirits (and anyone else who stumbles across this thread), the primary IDE controller has been set to PIO and locked it.  Who would have thought that Windows slowly reduced the transfer speed, whenever he saw 6 errors on an IDE device until it has been reduced to PIO and then he locked it?  But the procedures described in the link of winhlp.com showed how to solve the problem.

  There are actually several problems that led to the final symptoms.  According to KB817472, the Atapi.sys has been improved in XP SP2 only degrade the speed of transfer on 6 consecutive errors instead of 6 cumulative errors.  And even though everything I have (Microsoft update) was seen and showed that this area was to SP3, I found that the driver for the controller layer IDE was the SP2 version.  Someone ran sfc previously perhaps?

  Oh, and I know now that the Task Manager process tab does not time processor kernal, but the performance tab.  Good to know...

  Thanks again to all who have responded.  Starting at the time of connection-question now is 40 seconds.   You'll love Untra DMA mode 5.   There is still a lingering question in my mind, since I've had the same symptoms of slow copy of a file on a flash drive.  Perhaps a link in some way to the way that Windows treats a flashdrive as a "drive"...

• Should have 8 000 emails in my Inbox Windows Mail (Vista) considerably slow down my computer with 3 GB of RAM and trigger alerts from Norton of "the High CPU use by Windows Mail.

  In addition, about half of my 8,000 e-mails are unread. Thus, the fact of having 4 000 unread emails in my mailbox Windows (Vista) slow down my computer more than if they were 4 000 read emails?

  If so, is there a quick way to mark all read emails as read in Windows Mail (Vista)?      .. .in windows Live Mail (Vista)?

  Even if these unread e-mails degrade the speed, is there a quick way to mark all read emails as read in Windows Mail (Vista)?... .in windows Live Mail (Vista)?

  I also regularly get an alert Norton of 'Use of disc high by Microsoft Windows Search Indexer.'  Gravity is the next, and what can I do to fix the problem?

  Finally, I have a lot of folders: would have 2,000 emails in the Inbox Windows (Vista) slow down a computer more than if 2 000 mails were one or more files?   This change of response if the e-mail is unread vs bed?

  #2: the Inbox is accessible by your computer whenever he asks new messages. The fact of having 1,000 messages in the Inbox slow it down? I have no personal experience, since I never have more than a dozen or messages in my Inbox, but it is so likely. If you have lots of free space on the hard disk, the messages would be better in another folder (s). Even if you create more WinMail's local folders and move messages to them.

  I would also say this. Try to compact and repair the database.

  WMUtil
  http://www.oehelp.com/WMUtil/default.aspx

  It can be very useful, and it can't hurt anything.

• E3000 questions?

  Good,

  Does anyone know what kind of performance downgrades occur when changing the e3000 from mixed mode wireless one being dedicated to n and g?

  If you have N wireless devices and peripheral G that both connected to the channel 2.4 GHz Wireless, you will see a deterioration on Wireless N devices.  Wireless N devices want to transmit 300 Mbps, but are limited by the signals to wireless G 54 Mbps devices.  If you have wireless-B devices and connected to channel 2.4 GHz Wireless-G devices devices wireless G (or Wireless N devices) will see some degradation thus speeds wireless-B only 11 Mbps.

  If you replace your 2.4 GHz "B/G" only channels and your 5 GHz for ' A/N Only' channel then you can your devices Wireless N separate from your frequency wireless B/G devices.  It's the only potential to follow advantageous way.  This requires that ALL your Wireless N devices are capable of 5 GHz however, otherwise you won't be able to connect to the 2.4 GHz channel, but will be limited to 54 Mbps, because you are only allowing it to connect to a wireless - G speed.

• The CPU usage goes to 100%

  I have a laptop Dell Studio 2010, the processor Intel, 4 GB of ram, hard disk 320 GM (180 GB consumed) running Windows 7 and IE 11 giving me CPU usage problems.  I don't know what everything is related, so here's the story.

  I lived my download speed slow - dropped by half every 2 hours or more after a reboot.  Occasional problems with the speed of the computer as well, and when I checked the resource monitor I see the CPU usage hit 100%.  A reboot has always solved the problem.  Running in Mode safe mode eliminates the loss of download speed so I knew it wasn't a problem with the hardware or my cable modem or a wireless router.  I have explored many possible problems, but none solves the problem, then I reinstalled Win 7 Friday, January 16.  Download speed, not only fixed but faster than before.  It remains stable and do not disintegrate so there was something wrong with the OS, etc.

  However, the problem of the use of the CPU remains.  What seems to happen is that something triggers a high demand and then all processes on the computer joins.   When I look at the resource now monitor consumes 1.3% of CPU, but when things are choking it consumes 15% of CPU and go all processes running as 0.5% to 5%.  So you can't point to a single process as the culprit it is possible that web sites of strong demand (lots of ads) trigger the problem.  I'll do some research on that.

  I did a lot of web research as well as this forum, and no patches seem to work or apply to me.  I ran a Malwarebytes scan and a full virus scan with Microsoft Security Essentials: nothing found.

  The computer is almost 4 years, but I wouldn't spend the $$ to replace and find that the problem is software.  Any ideas?

  The problem solved when I've upgraded to Win10 on this machine.  At the same time degradation download speed (with time) newsletter is resolved.  I can't imagine how everything worked but I discussed the idea with several IT people I know and have gotten various suggestions.

  Since a clean installation of the operating system has not fixed it, I do not understand why install Win10 fixed, but that's it.

  Since then, I've replaced this computer.

• VMWare Server. Limits of Red y degradaciones

  Buenas,

  I have a problema ligero me ronda por oficina desde hace meses. y como veo no soy capaz solucionarlo recurrir decided he has the comunidad a worm if me hace ver algo of luz.

  The cuestion: why is limited and/or is decreased the speed of virtual una Máquina Red? inicialmente the speed of transfer are 2500 kbps are reduced will dropping, reduciendose hasta UN 70%! pasando a 500 Kbits/s/400 Kbps

  VOY a tratar dar details of the instalacion.

  We have in the oficina UN Servidor con UN S.O. W2008 server r2 host. In el run una unica Máquina virtual por gestionada a VMWare Server. S.O. El of the virtual machine are UN profesional WXP.

  El tiene en 2 red cards, a dedicated host para VMWare Server y las maquinas as corran sober el con una config "bridge." in this case solo una.

  En the virutal client (WXP) corre UN Apache Máquina y UN MySQL that benefits los servicios para una application web International (the what ve tronc en por the degradation of speed performance).

  Las mediciones las realizó desde otra Máquina using a 140 MB file.

  Bueno, estoy abierto a questions, sugerencias y recommandations.

  Salud

  Hola DiegoPS,

  Mucho mejor el performance of ESXi sober VMware Server.  Respecto al tema of her license, tienes than licenciar el ESXi, comprometer esta ser version gratuita, in the todas maneras hay than ingresar una key cual of license (free):

  https://www.VMware.com/tryvmware/index.php?p=free-ESXi&LP=1

  El client vSphere none is fired, esos 60 dias you muestra, to debe an el as ESXi no esta licenciado.

  Saludos,

  Patricio Cerda

• Corresponding to a graphics PCIe w / PCIe slot legitimate question.

  Hi all

  By everything I mean hurt and Jim - the hardware wizards! Another question of material...

  Comparing two Supermicro mb, the X8SAX and the X8STE, I noticed the X8SAX has two slots PCIe 2.0 x 16, while the X8STE has a x 8 PCIe 2.0 x 16 slot.

  So... my question is... If I use a graphics card of high-end as the GTX 260 or a lower end Geforce 9500 GT, buy the X8STE Mo would be a mistake, because the two cards is x 16 and put them in the 8 x using an x 16 slot degrade the speed in half - correct?

  the two cards is x 16 and put them in the 8 x using an x 16 slot degrade the speed in half - correct?

  Fix.

• V.2 WRT610N versus E4500 (or less): SPEED/RANGE?

  I just got a TiVo DVR and I would like to improve the range/speed I could get upgrade to the E4500 (or even any router).

  The DVR is about 40 feet (3 or 4 walls) away from the WRT610N v.2 and TiVo connection said generally 'fair' or 'good '.

  It works very well overall, but the instant response would be nice.

  My wife recenly bought a Droid and was given a tablet... better scope to the patio would be an asset for her. It would be another 15 feet, another wall (brick) but a large window.

  Thank you!

  Hi, you can check out the link below. This will help you decide.

  http://www6.nohold.NET/Cisco2/UKP.aspx?VW=1&docid=7cb5d04908bc409b92c272e16acd2458_Comparison_of_Lin...

• WiFi speed degrades over time

  This is driving me crazy!

  So, I have a reliable internet connection.  I start the speed test and get ~ 85 Mbps down.  Then slowly, it's even worse, down for like .05mpbs.  Until I turn the wifi on my computer, then it is fast again.  It can be as fast as 10 minutes - 2 hours.

  #1 idea:

  Something is sucking my internet connection.

  I used every tool under the Sun, with more success with Little Snitch.  Nothing uses my connection when it is slow.  The fan is off.  Computer does nothing.

  #2 idea:

  Something on my network is using my connection.

  Speedtest.NET my girlfriend is fast.  My iPhone is fast.  Just my computer is slow.

  I blame this on my router for centuries, but it does not explain why my girlfriend is fast.  So I bought a new router (nine Airport extreme), nothing works.

  Yet once, turn/turn on wifi it solves every time.  Right of return up to 85mpbs

  I have tried everything I can find online, and I'm about to pull the hair last out of my head.

  Thanks for any help

  MacBook Air, OS X El Capitan (10.11.5)

  What is an independent separate cable from the router modem?

  Ah yes I see it now

  Speedtest.NET my girlfriend is fast.  My iPhone is fast.  Just my computer is slow.

  This corroborerait not a defective modem / intermittent

  Try running the AHT http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1509

• Satellite U500 - temperature/fan speed of degradation after overheating

  The hard drive of my laptop suddenly developed a load of bad blocks without reason apparent, so I replaced it. I started a live linux CD to copy the old drive to the new and left running overnight. When I came back to him, he ran VERY hot. It's not well crushed.
  * Since then, the fan worked up a gear more often than before *, in the original Windows installation.
  Use a temperature monitoring program, I can see a temperature which is constantly higher than both the CPU and GPU, and I think this must be the problem. I can only think that it is setting the fan speed based on this incorrect measure. I don't know where this temperature is measured, and unfortunately I do not know what it was before the problem started. The new HDD is cool, so it is impossible that the change that caused the problem.
  Someone knows something I could try to fix this?

  Hi Blah_1,

  You probably have a higher internal temperature because your new HARD 7200 RPM drive instead of 5400 RPM. For hard drives at 7200 RPM are originally more heat during the backup process racing portable to use high CPU if it s normal behavior that he s hotter than normal.

  In any case, the laptop must be also cleaned from time to time using a jet of compressed air as described here:
  [How to clean a Toshiba laptop cooling system? | http://forums.computers.toshiba-europe.com/forums/forum.jspa?forumID=105]

• Speed degrades with Airport Extreme

  Hello

  I have an Airport Extreme and need to extend the wireless range to improve the signal - so I added an Airport Express.  Setup was simple and I had no problems.  Firmware is up to date on both units.

  When connected the intensity of the signal is full, but overall wireless performance decreases over time. I have a 100 GB cable connection.  Sometimes it will get between 75 GB and 100 GB, but most of the time that it is of the order of 20-29GB.  When the Apple Express is connected it can go below 10 GB.

  I had the supplier go out and check on the signal of the street in my house and they claim that the signal is very good.  I have read several posts suggesting to change the channel of 2.4 Ghz 11-to-1, so I did.  5 GHz running at 149.

  Should I reconfigure the network so the Express is the main unit connected to the Arris SB6121?  Then set up a WAN to the extreme? Or any other suggestions?

  Thank you

  Extend wireless will slow dramatic wireless... that is part of what extend wireless because of the design.

  In addition, the Express is a slow device... It is not in the same League that the extreme... its absolute maximum speed by ethernet is 100mbit. So it is hardly usable as a primary router.

  I doubt, exchanging the roles of the express and extreme will help even if we can solve another problem.

  The airport the last extreme IE height Gen6 model is not compatible with SB6121 cable modem. There is nothing wrong with any of them... they do not work together. If you just test the express... but are not wireless extend with the extreme... Use ethernet or ethernet EOP (called homeplug United States) on the power adapters... which may or may not work... but when they are far superior to wireless technology extends the installation program.

  Is be another post down 3... It is a common problem.

  Airport Extreme & Motorola Surfboard SB6121

• Windows on Windows 7 Pro OS firewall degrades in Internet download speed when activated

  We have about 20 users WIN7 Pro on an area that experiences slow down the speed download internet when connection area of Windows Firewall is enabled and the default values. The advertised speed is 50/25, but I get about 0.55 Mbps upload speed whenever I run a speed test of http://www.speedtest.net . All PC users are running A / V software with third-party firewall feature not installed.

  So, I decided to turn on a PC brand new Pro win7 without any A / V installed and Windows Firewall running the default settings on the home/work, software connection and got the same results. I tried this method on and off the field network. The only other thing to note is that the LAN is behind a firewall PFsense.

  If I disable the download speeds of Windows Firewall that he will immediately return to normal or most often over normal internet upload. Someone knows a problem similar to this?

  Hello

  Thanks for posting your query in Microsoft Community.

  According to the description of the problem, your computers are connected to a domain network. I would recommend posting your query in the TechNet Forums. TechNet is watched by other computing professionals who would be more likely to help you.

  TechNet Forum

  Hope this information is useful.

• Yesterday my AirPort express (2nd generation) wanted to update to be r 7.6.7. After that the speed of the aircraft fell sharply. Everyone has experienced similar behavior? Tips to solve the problem are welcome.

  Yesterday my Airport Express wanted to updated, I did. (from 7.4.6 to 7.6.7).

  After that, he started to behave erratically with big drops in speed. Anyone have similar experiences? How can I fix this without having to buy a new one.

  Stop your Mac. Turn off your Airport Express and stop the modem from your ISP. Wait 10 minutes, then turn on the modem to ISP, and then the Airport Express base station. Power on your Mac. Re-evaluate your performance problems.

  Run thisor that in this preference order to assess your latency time, download and bandwidth. You may need to modify the server or the other.

  I have upgrade 7.6.7 on my 4th gen Airport Extreme and observed no performance degradation to before the update.

  Sometimes the ISP gets their DNS in a tangle and makes the network almost Catatonic until they have to fix things. Nothing to do in this case at the user level. Did you call your ISP and asked them to check their equipment on your premises?

• Internet provider DOWNLOAD speed vs Airport Extreme

  Hello

  I had download speeds slow on my Airport Extreme for ipad, iPhone and imac.

  I have a modem connected via Ethernet cable to an ac Airport Extreme 802.11 Optimum.

  Ran to the application of speed test on my ipad II (within 5 feet of the airport).

  The results showed that the download is only 2.12mbps and upload is 24.97mbps. I pay for the 50mbps service.

  I tried the same thing by using a new iPhone SE and timed to 22,93 download and upload to 23.95. A little better but still not enough good.

  I contacted Optimum and they ran a couple of tests showing that my modem is online, signals are ideal, there is no loss of data to the modem and there is no failure in the region.

  They recommended connect a laptop directly to the router and without going through the airport. Will try it tonight to see the results.

  Assuming that the connection of the cable between the modem and the laptop is fast, what I can do to improve the speed of the WiFi?

  There is something to put in place at the airport? I guess there will be a reduction in speed between wired devices and WiFi but not this bad. What is the maximum number of devices (iphones, ipads or imacs) airport can support? I have at least 6 or more WiFi sharing schemes and wonder if this is the problem.

  Thank you

  Bob

  Please read using the Diagnostics wireless for you help to solve the problems of Wi-Fi on your Mac - Apple Support.

  What is the maximum number of devices (iphones, ipads or imacs) airport can support?

  Apple recommends 50. I got that three dozen sharing an Apple base station AirPort simultaneously with no noticeable performance degradation.

  The factor limiting the bandwidth will be the most restrictive of what follows, in no particular order:

  • your ISP
  • your local wireless environment, including other interference and competing wireless networks
  • the performance of the client machine
  • out of your control network conditions

  Your AEBS will not limit the bandwidth, but if you have reason to believe that it is, a "hard reset" is the only possible troubleshooting step. On rare occasions, an internal parameter becomes corrupted and this is the only way to fix it. By 'rare', I mean "almost never" and the last thing you should consider, after rule out all other possible causes of poor wireless performance.