Descendants of 1080 to 720 sequence?

Similar Questions

• reduction of 1920 x 1080 to 720 x 480

  We have just had an interview of 2 canera shoot and didn't know that our second camera was running in standard definition, 720 x 480.  Became aware of the issue when I dragged the files in Adobe Premiere Elements 10 for the first time and WAA wanted to change the project settings for. DV NTSC 720 x 480.  So well, I can live with the editing of the interview in the size of the image. The problem is that when I introduce images 1920 x 1080 in the second camera in my project of 720 x 480 setting, the frame gets leterboxed and therefore does not correspond to images of the stabdard camera, which is not Letterbox. Any advice on the best way to handle this situation. Ultimately, we want just the consistency between the two video outputs.

  Thank you all for your time and your insight.

  adobenewbie123

  Thanks for the reply.

  As I wrote previously

  If you have saved the NTSC Standard and use the NTSC DV Standard predefined project, then scaling of 1920 x 1080 in 720 x 480 look like what. If you try it, do it with default scale to the size of the image turned off so that you have more flexibility in the descaling operation.

  As a concrete example. I'm doing a project with Premiere elements HD 16:9 project preset and exporting segments of the timeline of a video into a blog. This blog offers only a 4:3 Player. So, I decided to export my calendar segment 16:9 with a 4:3 export preset. The first segment was beautiful in the blog. But, when I did the same thing for another segment containing different effects, the effects were in all directions ranging from 16:9 timeline where they looked like great export of 4:3 where they screwed up.

  I know what black stripes offer, and you get the whole image with the black border at the top and bottom.

  What I was suggesting through scale, is to get rid of black borders at the expense of the part of content useless managers. At this point, I don't see another way, unless you can find a way to use the 1920 x 1080 as an image in image type in the 4:3 image.

  Moreover, this scaling your way out of the situation is not new. We see mentioned for this sort of thing elsewhere online.

  Please think. Please let me know if you need clarification on what the scale to get rid of black borders.

  Thank you.

  RTA

• Camileo H30 Media Converter recognize fiels 1080 p 720 p

  On the thing, I'm not understanding is why the camera can record 1080 p, but still the highest resolution of Media Converter to convert the files to is only 720 p?

  It makes no sense at all. At the beginning and it off I'm disappointed that I can not just import directly from the camera into a video as Avid or Premiere Editor.
  The video comes out of plain white. I have to use Media Converter, and then import them into the editing program which doubles just enough time for everything.

  Explain the use of power shoot 1080 but not being is not able to keep it as 1080 p when you convert turned off the camera?

  Hello Vel_1,

  as far as I know, the ArcSoft MediaConverter 3.0 comes with the Camileo H30.
  I think that this kind of version of the software is limited to a maximum conversion up to 720 p.

  Best regards

• Apple "final cut pro 7", high res Pro 422lt 1920 x 1080 (odd) clips, is this gradual?, no 1080 progressive setting sequence, how can I ensure that I have the best setting of the timeline for my clips

  Apple "final cut pro 7", high res Pro 422lt 1920 x 1080 (odd) clips, is this gradual?, no sequence definition 1080 progressive

  How can I make sure that I have the best setting of the timeline for my clips. I did all the settings of Mount clips but there is no progressive setting for 1080 p. Images originally dslr Nikon that I used mpeg streamclip to convert to prores. Thanks for your help!

  The frame for you size source of material is HDTV 1080i (16:9). That only sets the size of the image, not the domination of the field, it's what makes progressive or interlaced. The reason it's labels with the 'i' is that when FCP7 was abandoned by Apple, they have never updated the software in order to take account of 1080 p contents.

  To make your progressive sequence, set the dominant field to None.

  gerforce wrote:

  Images originally dslr Nikon that I used mpeg streamclip to convert to prores.

  In your screenshot of the properties of the element for your clip to the source, the material is interlaced. At the original camera file interlaced or progressive?

  Also, the fps footage was actually 30 original and 29.97 not standard?  30 images/s is very limited its use.

  MtD

• mixture of 1080 and 720 images in the same project

  Hello

  I am new to Adobe Premiere and still learn the in and outs of the software.

  I had shot some footage with my Go Pro in 1080 p/30 FPS and I have pictures recorded in 720 p/30 fps that I wanted to include in a project

  My problem is that I noticed a decline in the quality when you export.

  I had exported with the following parameters:

  H.264

  Vimeo HD 1080 p

  Go to maximum depth

  Target the bitrate, flow Max: maxed out

  Maximum render quality

  Would be - this due to the fact that I have a 720 p movie in my project? And that he compensate?

  Is there a way to keep the project at the 1080 for 1080 images and keep the 720 720 in the same project?

  More than 100% scaling will degrade the quality.

  You can export at 1080, leaving a black frame around the 720 hardware, so it's not zoom.

  The best solution is probably just export to 720 and adjust images 1080 down a bit.

• 2.7 k, 1080 p, 720 p to the same project

  I have 2.7 k, 1080 p and 720 p video footage that I want in the same project. I know I can change my images, but I don't want to loose quality what is the best way to handle this? Is there a way to keep images of high quality, but also to add images to a lower resolution without losing quality?

  ashleye81453589 wrote:

  Does this mean that I will lose the quality of the 2.7 k and 1080 p and the entire video will be right in 720?

  Its either lose the full quality of

  2.7 K and 1080 p on a timeline 720 or

  2.7 K and 720 on a 1080 timeline: your choice

  2.7 chronology is IMO not an option.

• Workflow for editing 4 k in sequence 1080 p?

  I am new to the first and still drove my head around this.

  So I turn in 4 k with a gopro on a drone.  I want to use most of the stabilizer of the chain to get rid of some of shakes it.

  My last video will be 1080 p so I guess to make better use of the culture of this chain wants to change in a sequence of 1080 p.

  What is the process for this?

  Through googling and trial and error now I am:

  Slip into my 4 k to sequence images,

  Return to the settings of the sequence and return to 1920 x 1080.

  Right click on the clip, then click on set to the size of the image

  However, when I go to use stabilizer warp he says "stabilizer Warp requires clip dimensions to match the sequence (fix by nexting)."

  So I guess I'm something wrong here.  If someone could (in a friendly way noob) explain the process, I should go by to get the most out of my high resolution in a sequence of 1080 p to make the most of the extra resolution to stabilize?

  Thank you!

  It's all right, (I still shoot 1080 and 720 sequences to have the resolution 2 x to zoom and crop to web content).

  When you nest a sequence of 4 k in a sequence of k 2, is the same that compose before, so your 4 k is cropped to 2 k, (as opposed to watching a window of 2 k 4 k).

  Go ahead and stabilize you images in a sequence of k 4 native and the edges revealed that results when you clear the autoscale will be clipped on when nested in sequence 2 k by default.

• Shot at 1920 x 1080, but want to compose at 1280 x 720

  I voluntarily turned an interview in 1920 x 1080 on my Canon DSL.

  I would like to compose the Premiere Pro project at 1280 x 720, so I can zoom and pan the video without the resolution to "lose".

  1. I'm just thinking that this can be done?

  2. suggestions of the steps of installation and import so things don't get re-sampled?

  Thank you.

  Simply drop your 1920 X 1080 in a sequence of 1280 X 720 and change as expected.

• 4 editing sequences of k in a sequence HD

  Hello

  I have a few PRORES 4 k images that I'd like to edit in HD (I like the ability to crop etc.)

  trying to find the best sequence settings to do that I am on windows and is not a pro res setting.

  If I create a sequence and import the clip, I wonder if I want to change the settings to match the clip that I chose. I have then go into the settings of sequence and change the resolution of 1920 x 1080. the issue I'm having is that the clips resized in the HD sequence do not play back smoothly while the 4 clips in a sequence of k 4 k!

  BTW, I am running windows 10. I7 5960 x o/c to 4 GHz with a GTX980

  Thank you!

  Hello

  There is no sequence ProRes, no do you need one. The fact is, you could look at sequence Presets of ARRI, AVCHD and DSLR all in 1080 p 30 and find the settings inside all 3 are identical! Would not matter of the 3 you use, if your source video is 1080 p 30 of any codec flavor.

  As you are using a 4 k source, what is the frame rate? If 30 p, then just choose a 1080 p 30 sequence, for example options AVCHD. 4 k to import clips in this project, and when you put the clips in the timeline, and it is said that they do not match, do not take into account-you do not want the 1080 p sequence is 4 k.

  When the clamps are timeline, right-click and choose set to the size of the image - which will make the 4 k clip fit into the framework of 1080 and you will pan and zoom without loss of quality (to a point, using available 4 k resolution of source). NOT chose not to scale to the size of the image, which works differently.

  I shot a concert of the choir in 4 k, leaving camera to wide angle to cover the whole Stadium for the duration (20 singers covered whole step). First, I edited in a sequence of 720 p, to give me a little more zoom-ability I would get with 1080 p. Was able to zoom in and get a close-up of waist in place of soloist! Of course by using keyframes allows for nice, zoom in and out, pan around the group, simulated camera movements etc.

  Thank you

  Jeff Pulera

  Safe Harbor computers

• Resizing of nested after change of sequence clips

  So I decided to edit my clips in 1080 to 720 proxies offline. I've done a few nests, but I didn't when you paste all back to 1080 online nested clips are still 720 and it is said to nest again if for some examples, I need warp to stabilize. If I resized the 150% nests I losing quality? can I change the nested? It is common or I'm the only one who did that?... It completely broke my workflow :/

  Can you just double click on the nests and set their sequence the same as your new master?

• How to match my clips to the correct sequence?

  My adobe first pro does not contain presets for dslr, it would nt be a problem for me, as adobe automatically asked for the game to me. Now it don't me more, does anyone know how can I fix?

  Drag and drop the clip on the new icon for the item in the project window.

  BTW - now you know what your DSLR is shooting and can create a corresponding sequence (which you can also save a Custom Preset)

  Its going to be 1080 or 720 I guess.

• 1920 up to 720 for some side

  Hi all

  Question about my avchd 1920 x 1080 and reduce my sequence up to 720 give me some side for the cultures of unwanted areas, so I don't need to use the zoom to blow pixels. I saw this fact with FCP, however I can't see my results after having created a 720 sequence using pictures 1920 size. I want big film for a smaller area to be able to crop the edges without the use of scale to 150%

  See photos if you're not clear on my question please. If it is easy to please write > on > the > path to market or access if they are available. Not a single word as see 'Valve of Kanuder' thank you.

  NORTH CAROLINA

  

  What you have surrounded in your first image is your preview file format.

  A change that does not change the settings of your sequence.

  Like Jim sez, you must create a new sequence of 720.

  Not editable after footage on a timeline?

  Not be changed after it is created, images or not.

• Export a sequence cropped vs scale

  Hey people.

  I saw this thread on the scale of a sequence of 1080 to 720 and thought I would give it a try.  I used to do the scaling when I export my clips in MPEG4, so I wanted to see if it was different.  Now, I didn't follow the instructions completely on my first pass because I forgot to back - click on the sequence and scale to the size of the image.  So my exported video eventually be cropped.  Well, no problem... easy to fix error.  The second time I spent there, I remembered the scale and everything was good.

  However, what I'm curious about is the use of CPU for the two exports.  I sort of expected export to the scale to use more CPU than cropped.  But this isn't what happened, and I'm interested to know why?  The video itself is about 8.5 minutes, media are AVCHD and the MPEG4 output.  The cropped version (IE, the error) took Media Encoder at 05:49 to finish.  The scale of a 07:08 version.

  The use of the processor when cropped export:

  

  And the use of the processor during export to the scale:

  

  Clearly what SOUL and body were exporting my mistake, they were able to make better use of carrots on my Mac and rip through there more than a minute faster than the version on the scale.  Now, I would have expected that cropped to take less time, but I was also expecting version reduced to eating more cycles CPU.  I'm guessing there's an interesting interaction with the nVidia card going on here, but I am not sure.

  Someone will ask me on the material even though actually, I think it is also relevant in this case:

  • Mac Pro 5.1 with upgrade 2 x x 5690 chips and running Lion 10.7.3
  • 48G of RAM, 16G which is zero RAM
  • nVidia Quadro 4000

  Any thoughts?

  JAS

  The CPU usage is lower because the scale is done on the GPU if you have a card that can be used for CUDA treatment (as do you). But even with the work done on the GPU, the scaling is much, much, much more by the difficult calculation that the cropping is not surprising to me that the scale has taken longer than the cropping.

  There are details on the scale with CUDA here.

• Importing video to 2.7 K for a project of 1080; Not good quality

  I'm on FCP 10.1.4.   Mounting on a MBP running OS 10.9.5 15 ".

  I imported a few beautiful images of GoPro 2.7 K 60 fps (59,94 p).   When I play it in the Viewer on the upper right of the screen, it looks great.   Strong, bright color, smooth.

  I created a project of 30 fps (29.97 p) 1080.   I intend to export to this resolution that I find he dribbles well and seems very well on most of the big and small screens.  However...

  If I take a video from the browser and drag it to my project, the quality is seriously degraded.  When I play now the same clip of the project rather than the browser, now it is very soft, the colors are not as nice.  It just looks like another shit GoPro video and not the high quality that looks outside the project.

  I did not export it again, but the experience passed, my export to compressor bring the fidelity of the original.

  I am aware that I am down the video resolution and frame rate, however, I've seen a few videos 1080 and 720 even very crunchy, so I don't know why this happens.  I thought that if I gave the CPF in addition that he needs, he could extract something nice.

  Can I trust that compressor will clean as much as possible?

  Should move on to a project which is 2K or 60 frames per second (to match the max resolution of the image collection that I have.)?

  I don't know some of my images is only 720 p.

  Is there a setting of FCP to have spend more time has translated the video of the native resolution of the resolution of the project?

  Thanks for any help.  This poisoning me for awhile.  Web searches raise obvious answers to this question, so I was hoping someone here could help me.

  Encrassante the Viewer to a higher quality and make the project. Generally, I think, unless you intend to use the extra size to crop, most users edit in the original size and create a master of the size before the revision downward on export.

• Xperia Z3 compact MHL 3.0 1080 p streaming

  Hello

  On my current phone xperia z likes to broadcast content to my TV bravia w905.

  This works well and should work with a compact z3 because this phone is MHL 3.0 better.

  Recently, however, I discovered that the compact display of the z3 is only 720 p.

  This phone will be able to stream 1080 p through the MHL?

  IM also a little worried that MHL on a compact size phone can work less, especially when streaming.

  Before you buy the compact Z3, I need to know how it behaves in mode MHL.

  Ideas on this subject would be greatly appreciated.

  Kind regards

  Gert-Jan fluff

  I tested here, and if you play a 1080 p video using the video, it has not been reduced and enhanced again. You get 1080 p in MMC without any scaling. But if the content you are viewing in the phone is not 1080 p (for example General apps like the Chrome mirror), the output in MMC is enhanced 1080 p 720 p (the phone always outputs 1080 p but it is enhanced in this resolution).