Development of 2d - performance (much slower than 9000 9500) games

Similar Questions

• Guest WiFi network much slower than normal on the network

  Speedtests leave a device attached to the 5 GHz wireless guest network are much slower than when the same device is connected to the normal 5 GHz WiFi.

  I measured reproducible all about 7ms 18/10 down on the network of comments and 1ms 320/250 Mbps on the normal network. Same place, same camera, same speedtest app, same test server.

  Similar results of multiple devices (laptop, Windows, iPhone 6 s). No change after a reboot. QoS is off. Firmware is 1.0.6.28_1.1.83.

  What could be the reason? I don't think that I had the same problems a few months ago, but I has not changed settings since then, except for the upgrade of the firmware when a new version appeared.

  Thanks for your advice.

  that version was pulled and pulling FW rarely happens... back having previously worked FW

• Performance: Much worse than iOS Android

  Hello guys,.

  I'm developing a game that uses mainly Starling to view the contents of the game as well as some classic UI DisplayList overlays (I know its not optimal).

  Performance wise the Android app works to the Release mode ~ 10 FPS on my Samsung Galaxy S1 while the iOS app works at ~ 50 FPS on my iPhone 3GS in compilation and ~ 15 FPS in interpreter mode.

  The code is the same on both versions, so I was wondering why the performance on the Samsung is so bad. If anyone has experienced something similar?

  Well I realized what the problem was, and I feel a bit silly about it to be sure

  In Android I'm dynamically loading an external swf asset in order to update any time of my remote server (other than on iOS where I use CFCS). The SWF gfx has about 150 frames on the timeline with all the different means (for the convenience of access in Flash CS). Now when I load the SWF, I never put it on the stage, I get just the necessary classes using getDefinitionByName(). But what I wasn't aware of is that the loaded swf file will loop 150 executives all the time in the background. Thus, each a few frames, a bunch of MovieClips where destroyed and new created. And this has had a significant impact on performance on Android.

  By stopping just the SWF on the first empty frame, I was able to increase performance at about 40 FPS vs 50 FPS on the iPhone 3GS. Given the higher for the Samsung display resolution, I think that it is reasonable.

  I have to say that during the debugging process, FlashDevelop Profiler both Adobe Scout for Android where of great help. And I've learned myself yet another huge lesson in ActionScript

  Thank you

• Why my iMac 4K (late2015) runs so much slower than my MacBook Pro 128SSD (end of 2012)?

  Both are basic model, without Add - ons or updated, the new iMac, retina display 4K runs as slow as some laptops HARD drive.

  What is the defect of manufacturing for my iMac? Any idea?

  Thank you.

  Your Mac has a Fusion (mixture of Spinning/SSD HD) drive, or is it totally SSD? How much RAM you have installed on the iMac over the laptop?

  You can download and run EtreCheck and post the contents of his report here and someone can spot something that could be the cause of slowdowns:

  http://etrecheck.com/

• Playback of a view is much slower than reading the table

  Hello
  
  I use the view in the physical layer. Query from this point of view is quite compilcated. However if I use correct filters the result is very fast (a few seconds)
  
  Responses of dashboard if I put a few columns from this point of view, and use the same filter, to 4 to 5 minutes to get the result. I don't know why the reading of the opinion is so slow on dashboard.
  
  If I create a table based on the view and use this table in the physical layer, then the result is much faster.
  
  Thank you

  Hello

  When the function u view the report in the bi bottom server sends the request to the database (if the cache is disabled).
  Come see, you already mentioned this query view is quite complicated, fires every time the query whenever you click on the report and checks all aggregations, the filter conditions, and joins.
  come to table, you are calculated and stored, each time that you run the report he just send the query like Select from table *.

  for this reason, the data view recovery is slow to table.

  See you soon,.
  Aravind

• Why Firefox MUCH slower than the 8.1 9.0? Just downloaded and tried and am used to dramatic improvements instead!

  It's a fact! Web pages load much more slowly, and I deleted the cache and done all the typical checks of my pages frequently visited with the same result.

  I just found the problem. For some reason, when I upgraded to 9.0, the settings in tools/options have been modified in the section on how Firefox connects to the Internet. I found to be returned to: 'use the system proxy settings' when I had previously put in "no proxy settings." Once I changed back, the speed is back up on top of the browser and everything checks very well now. Just in case you guys that see happen, then check this particular setting.

  In my situation, I am just connect to Sprint broadband with card data and did not the routers or network worry except that Windows 7 has implemented when I update software Sprint from time to time. This suggests that maybe Firefox 9.0 was just delivered to this particular my computer configuration, although it worked well like that. I hope this might help someone else!

• WRT160N speed much slower than the old WRT300N

  Speedtest.NET reports 5Mbsec vs 15 mbcvm old router. Cox's ISP.  I tried to disable UPnP as not suggested, no effect.  I tried to change the MTU to 1300 and 1350 as suggested by others, no effect.  Any other ideas?

  What is the version number of your router?

  What is the Security Mode?

  To get the best speed through the router, it took to set the Mode of WPA or WPA2 security. Also, try it out below mentioned parameters.

  Open an Internet Explorer browser on your computer (desktop) wired page. In the address bar type - 192.168.1.1 and press ENTER...
  Let the empty user name & password use admin lowercase...

  Click on the Wireless tab

  Click the sub-tab under wireless > Wireless Security...
  Change the mode of WPA wireless security, encryption, select TKIP. Password input your desired WPA key. For example, MySecretKey, this will serve as your network key whenever you connect to your wireless network. Do NOT give this key to anyone and do not forget the key.
  NOTE: The password must be more than 8 characters...

  Click the settings advanced wireless
  Change the tag to 75 interval, change the Fragmentation threshold to 2304, change the RTS threshold to 2304 and click on save settings...

• WRT310N - Tests of speed than 802.11 g or 802.11n are MUCH slower than Ethernet

  Hello. I have a WRT310N router connected to a cable modem. Because my internet connection is capped at 16 Mbps, I wait like http://speedtest.net/ speed tests and http://www.speakeasy.net/speedtest/ are very similar on Ethernet and wireless.

  The results more wireless are extremely poor (less than 1 MB/s) but via Ethernet, they are all around 16 Mbit/s.

  I first noticed questions during video streaming on Netflix HD for my XBOX 360 more 802.11n. My internet connection is fast enough for this, but not the video downgrades. This is clearly a problem with my wireless setup, but I don't know why it is so poor.

  Any suggestions are greatly appreciated.

  Thank you
  Jared

  Disable the made frame burst and also reduce the MTU to 1365 on the Configuration tab and click on save settings... Now, cycle power to the router and check... If this makes no difference then, try upgrading/re-flash firmware of the router and re-configiure the router from scratch.

• The repeated CFC function call is much slower than the UDF version

  For a project, we were faced with unexpected behavior of a CFC. Without going to much into the details of the project, it boils down to the following: when we run through a set of records, say 100 and apply a function to this topic, the overhead is 4-5 seconds extra when we call it a component instantiated (only once) compared to when code us as a UDF. Since our application can process thousands of records in 1 past the overload will quickly over 100 seconds compared to the UDF.

  I was wondering if there is no logical explanation for this behavior. From what I understand a function called from a component should not add any notable overload after the component was instantiated.

  Our installation is an installation of Coldfusion 8 Jrun running on Linux. We didn't really find anything on the web documenting this (or we found we have said that there will be no additional charge). We could modify the function call to a call from the UDF, but we prefer to keep in a CFC as there are more things behind the scenes that just formatted data.

  B.

  HA!  Cool!!! I think I solved it something, I feel so proud.

  I run the code of Adam and the first time I ran it I got similar to Biebel3 results.  But it's curious, I got the output of debug it showing that it wasn't show where the time was spent.  He would show almost two full seconds to build the page of CFCS, but the components in the table of debugging only added up to about 50 milliseconds.

  I tired first put a top of the page of CFC, but that has not changed the results.  Because even if you do not display the results, ColdFusion still satisfied the debug output.  I went into the administrator and effectively disabled the debugging feature.

  Alto, I started to have the results displayed by Adam.

  It seems that it is a question where it takes a lot of overhead for ColdFusion compile a record of debugging for each call of CFC in this large loop.

  The good news, this is a pretty easy solution for a production system.

• CHKDSK in windows xp hangs at 0% when the index checking, but eventually ends. Why it suddenly runs so much slower than before? Thank you.

  Once I got this error message after 3-4 were revealed when checking indexes scene: "an unexpected error has occurred...". ». At that time there chkdsk stopped and I had to close the window.

  Test the hard drive with a diagnostic utility downloaded from site of the disc mftr. or use SeaTools for BACK of Seagate. You create a bootable CD with the files you download. You will need a third party burning software to do as the free ImgBurn, Nero or Roxio. Burn as an image, not in the form of data.

  http://www.ImgBurn.com

  http://www.Seagate.com/www/en-us/support/downloads/SeaTools/seatooldreg
  http://Seagate.custkb.com/Seagate/CRM/selfservice/search.jsp?docid=201271 (how-to)

  Boot with the CD that you have done and do a full test of the reader. The physical tests fail, replace it. MS - MVP - Elephant Boy computers - don't panic!

• Why is my wifi connection much slower than my 3G connection?

  I lot to access web pages when connect you via wifi. I am connected to my wifi network (at least he shows on the Meadow). Simply, it seems to load forever or expires. Sometimes, it will connect (perhaps only 10% of the time). No other problems with the other computers on my network.

  When I'm on 3g it is lightning fast. So for now I just turn off wifi.

  Any suggestions?

  Since the browser if you go to the options by clicking on the Web tab in the top left, then Preferences, you can clear history, Cookies and Cache. Maybe try that.

• Malware removed, but my computer is slower than before.

  Very well.

  I had a few irritating problems with my computer for awhile, and after some research diligent on my part, I came to know that it was a malware problem. So after I downloaded the appropriate programs and cleaned my computer, everything was completely fine and fixed and I'm super happy about it.

  But now my computer seems slower than before waaay. It freezes not, exactly, but everything is slower. To the point where the drop-down lists are empty, the cursor of the hit is constantly having to make up for what I'm hitting way after that I typed, and I can't even watch youtube videos simple.

  I checked and it does seem like I'm having all kinds of problems linked to the virus, it's just... slow.

  Is it normal that, even while my computer was slammed by virus/malware, he performed much faster than now, when it is all cleaned up? It just makes too much sense to me and I wondered if maybe I forget something. (I try to avoid reinstalling windows at this point because it feels like such a pain since I'm part of the 2% of owners of computers that their stuff is not saved.)

  Very well.

  I had a few irritating problems with my computer for awhile, and after some research diligent on my part, I came to know that it was a malware problem. So after I downloaded the appropriate programs and cleaned my computer, everything was completely fine and fixed and I'm super happy about it.

  But now my computer seems slower than before waaay. It freezes not, exactly, but everything is slower. To the point where the drop-down lists are empty, the cursor of the hit is constantly having to make up for what I'm hitting way after that I typed, and I can't even watch youtube videos simple.

  I checked and it does seem like I'm having all kinds of problems linked to the virus, it's just... slow.

  Is it normal that, even while my computer was slammed by virus/malware, he performed much faster than now, when it is all cleaned up? It just makes too much sense to me and I wondered if maybe I forget something. (I try to avoid reinstalling windows at this point because it feels like such a pain since I'm part of the 2% of owners of computers that their stuff is not saved.)

  Hey MrBelding

  Scan with the free version of malwarebytes anti-malware to make sure you got all the malware

  http://www.Malwarebytes.org/MBAM.php

  then run the sfc/scannow command. to attempt to repair system files

  read the information on how to do it at the link below microsoft

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929833

  Use the (SFC.exe) System File Checker tool to determine which file is causing the problem and then replace the file. To do this, follow these steps:

  1. Open an elevated command prompt. To do this, click Start, click principally madeprograms,Accessories, right-click guest, and then clickrun as administrator. If you are prompted for an administrator password or a confirmation, type the password, or clickallow.
  2. Type the following command and press ENTER:
     sfc/scannow

     The sfc/scannow command analyzes all protected system files and replaces incorrect versions with appropriate Microsoft versions.

  If that does not solve it you may need to do a repair installation upgrade

  If you do not have a microsoft dvd vista you will need to borrow a

  Read how to make the link below

  http://www.Vistax64.com/tutorials/88236-repair-install-Vista.html

  Walter, the time zone traveller

• accelerate CFHTTP on CF10 (5000 x slower than under CF8)

  Hi, we have freshly installed a large application of CF8 to CF10 and see that CFHTTP performance is * much * slower on the new system.

  We've checked by sequentially 50 CFHTTP to the small static active calls running on an Apache Server, measure the response time with gettickcount() and averaging on several tracks.

  On the installation of our old (Ubuntu + JRun + CF 8), we are averaging about 1 ms per request.

  On our new (Centos + CF 10 standalone) installation, we are averaging 5000 ms per request. Is 5,000 times slower.

  Initially, we have assumed that this phenomenon was linked to questions of generation of entropy as the first query in a series of tests would be relatively fast back (a few hundred Ms total) compared to all requests to this term.  However, try to change the JVM settings as prescribed is not solved the problem.  We tried more far using entropy-generating alternative tools (such as recommended in the blog original post cities in the above thread), but that did not help either one.

  Note that we also tested performance outside CF http using wget from a shell script, where we have seen good performance (about 1 ms per request).

  Any help on this will be greatly appreciated, thanks!

  
  

  Update: just tested the CFHTTP CF + http://coldfusion9.blogspot.com/2012/03/custom-cfhttp-tag.html Java-based alternative

  It took a few minor bug fixes, but is greatly outperforming CFHTTP from CF 10, with an average of 33 ms by request (always much slower than CF 8, but can be used for most of the cases).  However, I always look for a solution restore speed appropriate for CFHTTP!

  Post edited by: Jon Obuchowski to add the test with the custom CFHTTP tag

  Thank you.  I have modified the code and added 2 additional calls to the CFC HTTPRequest and CFX_HTTP5.  (I had to also modify the CFC to activate applications without the URL/form vars).

  I tried this on ColdFusion 8, 9 & 10 Windows.  I shot 50 files of 5 different internal web servers.  (WARNING: the specifications are not the same for each server CF.)

  Here are the averages.

  10 ColdFusion CFHTTP: 9.04 CFC: 18,14 CFX_HTTP5: 1.26

  ColdFusion 9 CFHTTP: 8.08 CFC: CFX_HTTP5 158.92: 2.4

  ColdFusion 8 CFHTTP: 4.86 CFC: 149.14 CFX_HTTP5: 2.14

  I posted a blog in this regard entry and shared the CFML that I used to compare performance:

  http://gamesover2600.Tumblr.com/post/88683513184/ColdFusion-CFHttp-versus-httprequestcfc-v ersus

• Computer running much slower after a Windows Update.

  Windows Update problem

  This morning, I shut down my computer and installed the updates at the same time. When I switched back on it, he says that he has set up updates. He got 15% and then closes, rebooted and configured updates as usual. However, my computer runs much slower than usual. Any idea on how I can fix this? Thank you very much.

  Check your hard drive for errors:

  Click Start

  Type: CMD, according to the results, right-click CMD

  Click on "Run as Administrator"

  At the command prompt, type: chkdsk /f /r

  When you restart your system, your computer will be scanned for errors and will try to correct them.

  also:

  Click Start
  Type: CMD, according to the results, right-click CMD
  Click on "Run as Administrator"
  At the command prompt, type: sfc/scannow

  This will check for any breach of integrity

  Restart your system

• Satellite A300D-17F runs slower than expected

  Satellite A300D-17 F

  Hi friends

  Since I bought this machine, I am not happy.
  There is a problem: he works so slow than other laptops and they have inferior properties.
  I don't understand.

  I almost have to break. I've done all the tips (uninstall tempro, stop the backround programs, program viruses... etc) but it's the same.
  -J' I want to listen to an mp3 that is not open for ten seconds, watch the movie it is not open again for 9 to 10 seconds.
  -i wana to connect to a site web it freezes
  -for example the search for Messenger is taking once again for secondssssss
  -implementation of xp, it is hourssss
  but the machines of my friends who have inferior properties are so fast

  Is there someone has this machines? It has the same problems? or only I have these problems?

  Thank you very much right now.

  Hi mate

  > Configuration of xp, it is hourssss
  This means that you have tested the laptop under Win XP?

  How did you install the Win XP? Have you installed using AHCI mode (in BIOS) or you switch to compatible mode?

  By using the compatibility mode that HARD drive could run slower and this could affect the performance of the operating system.

  Solution: You must install the Win XP in AHCI mode. I think the laptop supports the AMD chipset and the required drivers are therefore part of the ATI graphics chip.
  Download the graphics driver, choose the drivers SATA and include it in the Win XP disc using nLite application. nLite is free and all details can be found in the internet.