WRT310N - Tests of speed than 802.11 g or 802.11n are MUCH slower than Ethernet

Similar Questions

• Guest WiFi network much slower than normal on the network

  Speedtests leave a device attached to the 5 GHz wireless guest network are much slower than when the same device is connected to the normal 5 GHz WiFi.

  I measured reproducible all about 7ms 18/10 down on the network of comments and 1ms 320/250 Mbps on the normal network. Same place, same camera, same speedtest app, same test server.

  Similar results of multiple devices (laptop, Windows, iPhone 6 s). No change after a reboot. QoS is off. Firmware is 1.0.6.28_1.1.83.

  What could be the reason? I don't think that I had the same problems a few months ago, but I has not changed settings since then, except for the upgrade of the firmware when a new version appeared.

  Thanks for your advice.

  that version was pulled and pulling FW rarely happens... back having previously worked FW

• My speed has decreased between the router and the modem is not working properly, what can I do to increase the download speed with my Time Capsule 802.11n

  My speed has decreased between the router and the modem is not working properly, what can I do to increase the download speed with my Time Capsule 802.11n

  A variety of phenomena can affect the performance of its wireless network. You may be able to mitigate some negative effects.

  Solutions to any factors that may have an impact on your wireless network, read use the Diagnostics wireless for you help to solve the problems of Wi-Fi on your Mac - Apple Support.

• Download Max for 802.11n speed

  I have a mid-2010 Studio XPS 9100 with a DW1525 (802.11n) WLAN PCIe Card that is maxing out at 50 Mbps. technician from Comcast showed 100 Mbit/s of the router {(service 150 Mbits/s).}

  Win 10 x 64. Is it possible to achieve download speeds more?

  Thank you.

  ARNE286,

  Your computer requires a Windows 10 driver for the card. Unfortunately, Dell has not all the 10 Windows drivers for this computer.

• Best software to test the speed of LAN?

  In the environment, that we are being run/tested, I am trying to determine the best option to test the speed of the LAN from one host to another.

  For example...

  I have a TestCluster with 2 hosts. In each host, I have 2 VM. Currently in each host, I also have 2 NETWORK interface card (1 GB speed).

  I want to test the network speed in two areas.

  1. from VM in VM in the same HOST.

  2. from HOST to HOST with 1 VM since 1 HOST sending data to the other virtual within another HOST computer.

  I did the software searches such as Iperf and Jperf, where exactly what I need... but it seems that send data to the high too for 500 MB or more... This is not good enough to saturate a 10 GB 1 GB, 2 GB, for testing network.

  So my question is... What kind of software of network test that VM Guru allows you to test your network traffic?

  Any help is really appreciated.

  -Erich

  Iperf is fine. Make sure that you just do not run with the default settings because it establishes that a TCP connection, not really representative to test the total flow of your link.

  Use the switch Pei to establish multiple simultaneous connections and/or to increase the TCP window size with - w. This should boost your results significantly, unless you really have a network problem.

  I personally tested on Linux virtual machines with vmxnet3 iperf and achieved results of more 25Gbit/s (Yes, really) within a 3-4Gbit/s on Windows virtual machines within the same host and host.

  Between physical hosts, I get a few good 900 + Mbps on our 1Gbit network.

• Qosmio G50 802.11n enabled but does not work properly

  Hello

  I get a new Qosmio G50 on Christmas and now I have a little problem. I use a draft N of D-link access point and I want to use 802.11n mode with my qosmio. But I have some problems with it. I activated the 802.11n mode in the peripheral band Manager and channelbandwidth 2.4 & 5.2 are both set to "auto". But I don't get the 300mbps, 60mbps is what I get. My father has a portable computer from a different manufacture with also a 802.11n wireless card but not Intel and other mobile, I get the 300mbps! I put books together in the same room, the other get the qosmio 300mbps varies from 1 to 81mbps or more.

  -Does anyone know what goes wrong or what I need to change something in the Device Manager? I heard that many other intel WiFi 5100 owners also do not receive the speed of 300mbps.

  can someone help me?

  Greetz

  Have you tried turning off modes of 802.11g/b/a by assigning "802.11n only?

  Access device wireless LAN settings in Device Manager to change these settings.

  Remember not that 300Mpbs speed signal. Actual data transfer speed (less overhead) is less than 100 Mbps

• 802.11 wireless extend ac / 802.11n Base Stations

  Hello

  I tested the following wireless extend the installation program:

  (1) modem connects Airport Extreme 802.11ac running--> Wireless extends another Airpot extreme running 802.11ac

  (2) modem connects Airport Extreme 802.11ac--> wireless running extends an another old Time Capsule running 802.11n

  If I connect a device to the base station of second (an extensive wireless), I think that option 1 would give a better performance? Since that they are extended wireless with 802.11 ac. But after this test, it seems that the performance is similar in both configurations. It's supposed to be like that or there is an option I'm aware of that allows you to establish which wireless standard ask?

  Thank you very much.

  Found the similar thread that answers my question:

  https://discussions.Apple.com/thread/6521335?start=0&TSTART=0

  "TC and airports rank by the strength of the signal, no signal speed."

  Although they are not separate FAT portion, but I guess that my base stations connect via 802.11n channel after all.

• What 802.11n card internal work with a Compaq CQ60-212US?

  I hope to upgrade the laptop above to 802.11n, but I'm unable to find information on what the internal cards will work for her. It's an AMD Athlon X 2 sytem wiyh a Nvidia nforce chipset running Windows Vista Home Premium 64-bit. The card he uses currently (802. 11 b / G) is a card Atheros 5007 based (part #459339-003). Base HP/Compaq made an Atheros 802.11n 5009 (manufacturer 482260-001) card which I believe may work, but my model is not listed in the compatibility list and I know that HP/Compaq are one of the companies that uses a 'white list' in the BIOS to prevent unauthorized devices to use.  I tried to ask by e-mail and they would not check the number and directed me to call their purchases as part Surfer do not have the list. I called and they said, there is one that would work but it is out of stock and they have no ETA on this subject and of course would not check the number. Any info on 802.11n cards that would work in this laptop that I would like to upgrade to high speed and that the ethernet connection is part of the chipset (even though Device Manager it ID as a 10/100/1000 is only 10/100 ) it is the only road I have so any information would be appreciated.

  -After much research and hitting my head against the wall, I finally got my laptop upgraded using a HP 482260-001 internal NIC (a card Atheros 5009) based manufacturer and now have an 300Mbps connection solid of rock all the time. I know I've read a lot of the problems with this card so I thought I'd post a brief overview of what I had to do.

  First - before Exchange you cards (unless you can connect to a wired LAN cable outlet) download the latest driver from HP for the Atheros card - even if this computer only provided with the card (5007 based) G the downloaded driver supports card 5009 N. depends on how do you the next step, you can save the file on a USB Flash drive.

  Following installation the new card and either do a system restore to the point where the updates of Microsoft are deleted (it will mess up wireless connections - this too is a XP updates)-well mine did not for the next option was to do a full system restore to put the laptop to a 'new' State but mine has NEVER worked since the restore disks , I did or since the restore partition, so that leaves one last (option in addition to the PURCHASE of a set of disks to restore HP that they tried to sell me or uninstallation of 56 upgrades ONE BY ONE). If you know someone who has a Vista installation disc to borrow it and use the option UPGRADE to install the same version that you use the SAME key from the bottom of your laptop - this route 'upgrade' will restore your system with the original copy of Vista without losing any of your installed programs where are you got your restore to work , you would be at square one - you be the judge. Before anyone questions the legality of my last method here is the real deal - when you buy copy of Windows or a computer, you are not 'buy' Windows software - you pay for the license (as the key) to use a copy (unless you buy a copy of multi license) on a computer if Windows or use the method as long as you use YOUR key to install the SAME version of Windows is no legal - my installation activated with absolutely no problem and shows it as authentic.

  OK - now if you need to re - install the driver updated for the Atheros card and at that time you should be able to connect to your wireless network. In my case, it would only connect at 54Mbps, and it turns out he was addicted to router and nothing to do Wicker card or driver. I had read that Vista doesn't like WEP so I stop ALL security/encryption on the router and NIC (not a good idea in general, but just to test) and the connection turned up to 300Mbps (no, not the max of 270Mbps reported some have reported with this card). I tried to change security settings and he kept falling back to 54 Mbps and then I spotted this in the sidebar of my router (Netgear WNR3500) aid:

  "To achieve maximum wireless performance, as WN511B must connect to this router with the help of WPA2(with AES). «For the clients that connect to WPA - PSK (with TKIP), maximum speed wireless will be 802.11 g.»

  So I put the router for the listed specifications before and my Atheros card stuck to the solid 300Mbps. This last part watch is obviously a problem of router/nic as before when I was running mobile WEP another computer security (brand begins with G ;-)) was ongoing execution using a card Linksys under XP (a plug in one on the side) to 270Mbps but now under new security my Compaq runs on 300Mbps, my 'G' works to 270Mbps and my cable network is running at 1000Mbps, and everybody is happy!)

  The next step is to reinstall the updates of Windows one or 2 at a time until those that trashes the connection lies - uninstall and it block. When I get to this point I'll post the update # (unless someone beats me to it). It's a very summarized race to the bottom, so if you have any questions please message but I wanted people to know it's possible!

• How can I update to network without WIRE Draft 802.11n draft 5742z-4200 adapter

  I have an Acer Aspire 5742z-4200, and it came with a mini PCI-E card of draft 802.11n.  I didn't need much in the way of transfer speed out of the machine most of the time I've owned it, but now all of a sudden.

  I bought two Inetl 802.11 b/g/n/ac cards, assuming that the PCI-E was a standard housing, and one card would work, like the other, but with different capacities.  That doesn't seem to matter of bethe.  After installation of each, the PC started very slowly, but has managed to load network tot connect drivers and even transfer files at lightning speed, compared to my connection 802.11 g.  But overall, the laptop is too slow to use.

  A little research on Google introduced me to the term 'material whitelist.  I imagine that it is also possible tensions, frequency of the bus or whatever it is of another participant might be incompatible.  The PC works fine with the old card in it, so I don't think I have anything damaged.  Does anyone know what I need to do to upgrade the WLAN card in my laptop?  If I'm relegated to get a USB adapter?

  Thanks for your help!

  OK, some more application of Google-fu, and I read more on the subject of the registration of the pins with more recently introduced functions.  Pin 20 seemed to have something to with a wireless radio turn off the feature that did not have previous PCIe slots/motherboards.  The symptom seems to be no visible from card otherwise functional networks.  PIN 51 resembled a new feature/issue and seemed to have something with the ability to disable the radio more than one.  (The 802.11ac card I got a bluetooth as well.)  It is manufactured by chipzilla, a nd a 2.4 and 5 Ghz frequencies for WLAN function. I wanted the frequencies and the 802.11ac and struggled to find one without Bluetooth.  It was $ 31).

  This PC is quite old now (Core 2 Duo 2 Ghz, DDR3 1333 MHz RAM - a bit slow, but with a small SSD, it's fine for my purposes.) and not worth much and I save all the time so I decided to give it a shot.  I don't know the rules here to post links, so I don't want to, but they are not hard to find.  A few people have even posted revision of the Chipzilla official on the mini PCIe spec for the addition of several start/stop function triggered on the PIN 51 radio.  PIN Ribbon 51 seems to have solved the problem completely.

  Yet now my machine starts quick, the transfer rate WiFi is what it should be and if I don't have any Bluetooth use, the devices all appear OK in Device Mangler.  I guess that all 802.11ac cards with several radio stations have this PIN 51 - multiple radio disable switch compatibility issues when used in older laptops.  I look around a bit for one with no Bluetooth, but saw nothing so I decided to try the hack.  If the thing starts to smoke or whatever it is, I'll come back and update this thread.  I wouldn't spread dangerous advice.

  Thanks again, Chris.

• Configure 1141n with 802.11n

  Hello community,

  Currently, I'm trying to set up a 1141n (AIR-AP1141N-E-K9) autonomous access point with 802.11n. When I configure the access point for no encryption or aes - ccm encryption I am not able to set up the parameters of speed of dot11n (max. 54 Mbps). In addition, documentation (data sheet, conf IOS guide, getting started) said that the ap has two interface for (dot11radio0) 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz (dot11radio1) radio. I am not able to configure the interface dot11radio1. I tried to reset the access point to the default configuration, but this makes no difference. Even with default conf I can't configure dot11n. My question is: what am I doing wrong? Can someone help me?

  Concerning

  Bastian

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Cisco IOS software, C1140 Software (C1140-K9W7-M), Version 12.4 (21a) JA1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)

  processor of Cisco AIR-AP1141N-E-K9 (PowerPC405ex) (revision B0) with K 98294/32
  768K bytes of memory.
  Card processor ID FCZ1419W0LN
  PowerPC405ex CPU at 586 Mhz, the 0x147E revision number
  Last reset of tension
  1 gigabit Ethernet interface
  1 802.11 post<---->

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  !
  version 12.4
  no service button
  horodateurs service debug datetime msec
  Log service timestamps datetime msec
  encryption password service
  !
  hostname jug5128
  !
  enable secret 5<...>
  !
  AAA new-model
  !
  !
  AAA rad_mac radius server group
  ACCT-port of the server 10.1.111.33 auth-port 1812 1813
  !
  Group AAA authentication login default RADIUS
  AAA authentication login auth_mac group rad_mac
  Group AAA authorization exec default RADIUS
  !
  AAA - the id of the joint session
  IP zentral - .jug .de domain name
  !
  !
  dot11 syslog
  dot11 vlan-name ADMIN vlan 119
  dot11 vlan-name WLAN vlan 130
  !
  dot11 ssid junghans119
  VLAN 119
  open authentication
  authentication-key wpa version2 management
  WPA - psk ascii 7<...>
  !
  dot11 ssid junghans130
  VLAN 130
  open authentication
  authentication-key wpa version2 management
  WPA - psk ascii 7<...>
  !
  !
  Crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-3181710497
  enrollment selfsigned
  name of the object cn = IOS - Self - signed - certificate - 3181710497
  revocation checking no
  rsakeypair TP-self-signed-3181710497
  !
  !
  TP-self-signed-3181710497 crypto pki certificate chain
  certificate self-signed 01
  <...>
  quit smoking
  !
  !
  Bridge IRB
  !
  !
  interface Dot11Radio0
  no ip address
  no ip route cache
  !
  encryption mode vlan 130 ciphers aes - ccm
  !
  encryption mode vlan 119 ciphers aes - ccm

  !
  SSID junghans119
  !
  SSID junghans130
  !
  gain of antenna 0
  Base-1 speed, 0 2.0 5.5 11.0 6.0 12.0 9.0 18.0 24.0 36.0 48.0 54.0 m0. M1. M2. M3. M4. M8. M9. M10. M11. M12. M13. M14. M15.
  root of station-role
  !
  interface Dot11Radio0.119
  119 native encapsulation dot1Q
  no ip route cache
  Bridge-Group 1
  Bridge-Group 1 block-unknown-source
  No source of bridge-Group 1-learning
  unicast bridge-Group 1-floods
  Bridge-Group 1 covering-disabled people
  !
  interface Dot11Radio0.130
  encapsulation dot1Q 130
  no ip route cache
  Bridge-Group 3
  the bridge-group subscriber-loop-control 3
  Bridge-Group 3 block-unknown-source
  No source of bridge-Group 3-learning
  No bridge Group 3 unicast-flooding
  Bridge-group spanning 3-people with disabilities
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet0
  no ip address
  no ip route cache
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  No keepalive
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet0.119
  119 native encapsulation dot1Q
  no ip route cache
  Bridge-Group 1
  No source of bridge-Group 1-learning
  Bridge-Group 1 covering-disabled people
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet0.130
  encapsulation dot1Q 130
  no ip route cache
  Bridge-Group 3
  No source of bridge-Group 3-learning
  Bridge-group spanning 3-people with disabilities
  !
  interface BVI1
  IP 10.1.119.92 255.255.255.0
  no ip route cache
  !
  default IP gateway - 10.1.119.1
  no ip address of the http server
  IP http secure server
  IP http help-path http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/smbiz/prodconfig/help/eag
  radius of the IP source-interface BVI1
  test SNMP-Server RO community
  not run cdp
  local RADIUS server
  !
  format of server RADIUS attribute 32 include-in-access-req hour
  RADIUS-server host 10.1.111.33 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813 hits 7<...>
  RADIUS vsa server send accounting
  1 channel ip bridge
  !
  !
  !
  Line con 0
  line vty 0 4
  !
  end

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  jug5128 (config) #interface dot11Radio?
    <0-0>Number of Dot11Radio interface

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  According to the output you associate with MCS rates

  "Current rate: m15.

  You will not be able to achieve the full 300Mbps throughput until you enable the channel binding, but this is not recommended from the b/g networks because it would effectivly leaves you with only one channel of Alcan.

• 2006 WLC and 802.11n

  I have a 2006 WLC with 6 1242 APs and wondered what should I expect when I can replace 1242 a 802.11n AP.

  I know that the new access point will not work at full speed, but other than that, I don't know.

  Any ideas on that?

  Thank you, Gary

  So I can add an 802.11N AP to the controller
  

  802.11n AP only, you can use is the 1250.

  BUT it will not run at the N speed, etc.  Right?
  

  You can activate 802.11n, but because the controller has speed 10/100BaseTx, then you have a bottleneck.

  So what we're thinking is purchasing 1 or 2 of the APs and let them run on our 2006 WLC, knowing that i WILL not see the speed difference, etc until next year, when i get the new WLC.
  

  You do not things easy for me are you?

  Ok.  So that you know what your next financial bucket will come in.  What your savings.  1250 in a desktop environment... Hmmm... I don't recommend it.  1250 need 20.0 watts of power (because you are running firmware 4.X).   IF you use either a switch that can pour 20.0 PoE power, a power injector or remove one of the radio modules.

  If you, for example, the baby 1040 (aka "N") or more the 5508 1140 then you can really run 802.11n.

• DV7-1245dx: computer laptop dv7-1245dx: update to card WiFi... Need for 802.11n

  I have a HP dv7-1245dx laptop AMD with a Wireless G Wifi Atheros ar5007 card. I want to update my WiFi card for 802.11n more speed fast and really would like if I can get bluetooth at the same time the new wifi card. Any IDE?

  In case anyone is looking for a solution... I did some more research and found that a

  Atheros AR5BXB92 AR9280 HP 482260-001 wireless adapter

  works very well.

• Satellite A-L50-18r - WiFi 802.11n standard is not available

  I have a Toshiba Satellite L50-A-18r with a Qualcomm Atheros AR956x Wireless Network Adapter wich suports wifi 802.11 b/g/n, but no more than 15 to 20 Mbps to 50 Mbps, I can't send my router.

  Also, in advanced options for the wireless adapter there are 802. 11B only option.

  How can I activate 802.11n to get faster.

  What operating system do you use?

  Have you tried to update the driver WLan?

• Satellite Pro A200-16YT - update wireless adapter card for 802.11n

  Satellite Pro A200-16YT (PSAE1E) with Windows XP Professional SP3 from the East.
  I tried to increase my existing 54 Mbps wireless network speed by replacing the Atheros AR5007-EG existing with 802.11n 802.11a/b/g more quick adapter.

  The Atheros driver is v9.2.0.439 (08/04/2011) it's later. I tried to install an Azurewave AR5BXB72 (Atheros AR5008) as a substitute, but without success. As well as trying the standard Windows wireless configuration, I used the Atheros Client Utility (ACU) which confirms that the card and the driver are installed and activated, but the radio does not, so no there is no association/connection to the wireless network!

  Reinstall the original AR5007 works without any problem. If someone experienced similar problems or can offer a solution, it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you

  Hello

  Not sure about this Wlan card but I read in the forum that some people had similar problems, allowing the new card Wlan.

  Check this thread for example:
  http://forums.computers.Toshiba-Europe.com/forums/thread.jspa?MessageID=253505

  It seems that the problem is related to the assignment of the WLan card pins.

• BCM94313HMGB combo wireless 802.11n and Bluetooth 3.0 half minicards UPgrade

  I recently bought your desktop pavilion pc p6-2378 with 8 64-bit windows.   Noticed that the Office lacks any wireless internet.

  Bought a BCM94313HMGB 802.11n and Bluetooth 3.0 high speed half mini-map and installed it.  Wireless driver works immediately.  But I donot see the radio bluetooth option anywhere.

  What Miss me?   Why didn't the radio bluetooth on the Device Manager?

  Yes. I saw that before posting.

  I used a mini-PCI card PCI-E and that caused the problem.  I inserted directly into the motherboard and bluetooth and wireless networking worked fine.

  Thank you.