Guest WiFi network much slower than normal on the network

Similar Questions

• Why is my wifi connection much slower than my 3G connection?

  I lot to access web pages when connect you via wifi. I am connected to my wifi network (at least he shows on the Meadow). Simply, it seems to load forever or expires. Sometimes, it will connect (perhaps only 10% of the time). No other problems with the other computers on my network.

  When I'm on 3g it is lightning fast. So for now I just turn off wifi.

  Any suggestions?

  Since the browser if you go to the options by clicking on the Web tab in the top left, then Preferences, you can clear history, Cookies and Cache. Maybe try that.

• Development of 2d - performance (much slower than 9000 9500) games

  
  

  Not really a player, I don't think it will be very useful, and it's entirely anecdotal, so I would not base your decisions on that, but maybe this will help you.

  Regarding the "power" of the various models of Blackberry, you could search the Internet, looking for the processor that is used as an indicator of the power.  BBs of Java didn't have (at least as I understand it) a graphics processor, then all the image processing is done on the main processor.

  You will find if you look at this page:

  http://en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/BlackBerry_Bold

  that the 9000 has a 624 MHz Marvell Tavor PXA930, while you are looking for here:

  http://en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/BlackBerry_Storm

  your Storm has a dual core CPU 400 MHz and ARM9 274 MHz ARM11

  Using the cycles in comparison, it would mean for me during the development of a game, it'll be quicker on the 9000 the storm, because I believe that the treatment of Java is in fact all is done on a single processor, if your painting will be restricted to the 400 Mhz on the storm.

  My experience is "BOLD" seems faster than the storm in general, but I actually always put that down to the bigger screen being slower to draw.

  In terms of processing power, the phone slower that I think you could develop to is in fact the storm, but actually I would not develop for it.  It has a system with a somewhat strange interface because of the screen push.  I would ignore this device and just concentrate on OS 5.0 devices.  To this end, the slower device is probably the Blackberry Curve 8520, with a 512 MHz processor.  I would get one of these for your tests.  Also, the (screen size, keyboard) form factor is shared by a large number of other phones.

  In general terms, my brief experience with treatment of the game showed me that if you want your game to go fast, be updated too little screen that you can.  So use 'regions' in your paint method to specify exactly which pieces on the screen should be updated.  In my tests, I tried to have a cursor to move around the screen using the trackpad.  If I moved the slider and then redisplays the whole screen, the performance has been extremely slow.  But if I just painted on the slider of the region it's in, and he painted in the apartment that he had moved, I got a slider action much, much more flexible.

• Why Firefox MUCH slower than the 8.1 9.0? Just downloaded and tried and am used to dramatic improvements instead!

  It's a fact! Web pages load much more slowly, and I deleted the cache and done all the typical checks of my pages frequently visited with the same result.

  I just found the problem. For some reason, when I upgraded to 9.0, the settings in tools/options have been modified in the section on how Firefox connects to the Internet. I found to be returned to: 'use the system proxy settings' when I had previously put in "no proxy settings." Once I changed back, the speed is back up on top of the browser and everything checks very well now. Just in case you guys that see happen, then check this particular setting.

  In my situation, I am just connect to Sprint broadband with card data and did not the routers or network worry except that Windows 7 has implemented when I update software Sprint from time to time. This suggests that maybe Firefox 9.0 was just delivered to this particular my computer configuration, although it worked well like that. I hope this might help someone else!

• Why my iMac 4K (late2015) runs so much slower than my MacBook Pro 128SSD (end of 2012)?

  Both are basic model, without Add - ons or updated, the new iMac, retina display 4K runs as slow as some laptops HARD drive.

  What is the defect of manufacturing for my iMac? Any idea?

  Thank you.

  Your Mac has a Fusion (mixture of Spinning/SSD HD) drive, or is it totally SSD? How much RAM you have installed on the iMac over the laptop?

  You can download and run EtreCheck and post the contents of his report here and someone can spot something that could be the cause of slowdowns:

  http://etrecheck.com/

• WRT160N speed much slower than the old WRT300N

  Speedtest.NET reports 5Mbsec vs 15 mbcvm old router. Cox's ISP.  I tried to disable UPnP as not suggested, no effect.  I tried to change the MTU to 1300 and 1350 as suggested by others, no effect.  Any other ideas?

  What is the version number of your router?

  What is the Security Mode?

  To get the best speed through the router, it took to set the Mode of WPA or WPA2 security. Also, try it out below mentioned parameters.

  Open an Internet Explorer browser on your computer (desktop) wired page. In the address bar type - 192.168.1.1 and press ENTER...
  Let the empty user name & password use admin lowercase...

  Click on the Wireless tab

  Click the sub-tab under wireless > Wireless Security...
  Change the mode of WPA wireless security, encryption, select TKIP. Password input your desired WPA key. For example, MySecretKey, this will serve as your network key whenever you connect to your wireless network. Do NOT give this key to anyone and do not forget the key.
  NOTE: The password must be more than 8 characters...

  Click the settings advanced wireless
  Change the tag to 75 interval, change the Fragmentation threshold to 2304, change the RTS threshold to 2304 and click on save settings...

• Playback of a view is much slower than reading the table

  Hello
  
  I use the view in the physical layer. Query from this point of view is quite compilcated. However if I use correct filters the result is very fast (a few seconds)
  
  Responses of dashboard if I put a few columns from this point of view, and use the same filter, to 4 to 5 minutes to get the result. I don't know why the reading of the opinion is so slow on dashboard.
  
  If I create a table based on the view and use this table in the physical layer, then the result is much faster.
  
  Thank you

  Hello

  When the function u view the report in the bi bottom server sends the request to the database (if the cache is disabled).
  Come see, you already mentioned this query view is quite complicated, fires every time the query whenever you click on the report and checks all aggregations, the filter conditions, and joins.
  come to table, you are calculated and stored, each time that you run the report he just send the query like Select from table *.

  for this reason, the data view recovery is slow to table.

  See you soon,.
  Aravind

• My phone, when I try to call, the volume seem to be so slow than normal, what happens after I have updated my phone, whenever I wear my scarf that I barely hear anything... Any solution? Thanks in advance

  My phone, when I try to call, I could barely hear the voice of the speaker, even turning on the Mono Audio, I rebooted the phone but nothing, this problem occurs after I updated the ios 9.3.5 aka the recent, so any solution pls response asap thx in advance

  Hello, dzharun!

  Thank you for joining the communities Support from Apple! It seems that you encounter to the appellants the hearing in question on your iPhone. I know how important it is, you are able to hear callers. Restart the phone and adjusting the audio are very advanced! Read this article If you hear not a person on an appeal or a voice messageor if the sound is not clear on your iPhone. Since you have tried reboot, find out exactly as follows:

  Turn off the receiver

  The receiver of the iPhone will not work properly if it is blocked or dirty.

  Follow these steps, after each:

  • Make sure that nothing is blocking the receiver, such as a case or a movie.
    If you have a new iPhone, remove the plastic on the front and the rear of the unit.
  • Check the receiver opening to see if it is blocked or dirty. If necessary, clean the receiver opening with a clean brush, dry, soft.
  • While you're online, turn on the speaker. If you still do not hear, then your network or the reception might be the issue. Try calling again later or somewhere else.

  Also, check out this article with links to learn more: get help with hardware on your iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch features. It has links to articles for several steps to help with issues with the receiver and the speaker.

  See you soon!

• WRT310N - Tests of speed than 802.11 g or 802.11n are MUCH slower than Ethernet

  Hello. I have a WRT310N router connected to a cable modem. Because my internet connection is capped at 16 Mbps, I wait like http://speedtest.net/ speed tests and http://www.speakeasy.net/speedtest/ are very similar on Ethernet and wireless.

  The results more wireless are extremely poor (less than 1 MB/s) but via Ethernet, they are all around 16 Mbit/s.

  I first noticed questions during video streaming on Netflix HD for my XBOX 360 more 802.11n. My internet connection is fast enough for this, but not the video downgrades. This is clearly a problem with my wireless setup, but I don't know why it is so poor.

  Any suggestions are greatly appreciated.

  Thank you
  Jared

  Disable the made frame burst and also reduce the MTU to 1365 on the Configuration tab and click on save settings... Now, cycle power to the router and check... If this makes no difference then, try upgrading/re-flash firmware of the router and re-configiure the router from scratch.

• The repeated CFC function call is much slower than the UDF version

  For a project, we were faced with unexpected behavior of a CFC. Without going to much into the details of the project, it boils down to the following: when we run through a set of records, say 100 and apply a function to this topic, the overhead is 4-5 seconds extra when we call it a component instantiated (only once) compared to when code us as a UDF. Since our application can process thousands of records in 1 past the overload will quickly over 100 seconds compared to the UDF.

  I was wondering if there is no logical explanation for this behavior. From what I understand a function called from a component should not add any notable overload after the component was instantiated.

  Our installation is an installation of Coldfusion 8 Jrun running on Linux. We didn't really find anything on the web documenting this (or we found we have said that there will be no additional charge). We could modify the function call to a call from the UDF, but we prefer to keep in a CFC as there are more things behind the scenes that just formatted data.

  B.

  HA!  Cool!!! I think I solved it something, I feel so proud.

  I run the code of Adam and the first time I ran it I got similar to Biebel3 results.  But it's curious, I got the output of debug it showing that it wasn't show where the time was spent.  He would show almost two full seconds to build the page of CFCS, but the components in the table of debugging only added up to about 50 milliseconds.

  I tired first put a top of the page of CFC, but that has not changed the results.  Because even if you do not display the results, ColdFusion still satisfied the debug output.  I went into the administrator and effectively disabled the debugging feature.

  Alto, I started to have the results displayed by Adam.

  It seems that it is a question where it takes a lot of overhead for ColdFusion compile a record of debugging for each call of CFC in this large loop.

  The good news, this is a pretty easy solution for a production system.

• CHKDSK in windows xp hangs at 0% when the index checking, but eventually ends. Why it suddenly runs so much slower than before? Thank you.

  Once I got this error message after 3-4 were revealed when checking indexes scene: "an unexpected error has occurred...". ». At that time there chkdsk stopped and I had to close the window.

  Test the hard drive with a diagnostic utility downloaded from site of the disc mftr. or use SeaTools for BACK of Seagate. You create a bootable CD with the files you download. You will need a third party burning software to do as the free ImgBurn, Nero or Roxio. Burn as an image, not in the form of data.

  http://www.ImgBurn.com

  http://www.Seagate.com/www/en-us/support/downloads/SeaTools/seatooldreg
  http://Seagate.custkb.com/Seagate/CRM/selfservice/search.jsp?docid=201271 (how-to)

  Boot with the CD that you have done and do a full test of the reader. The physical tests fail, replace it. MS - MVP - Elephant Boy computers - don't panic!

• Audio louder than normal after the update driver on windows 8.1

  Hello

  I've updated my audio driver under windows from the Dell Web site, I downloaded the 2014 Realtek driver which was good for my laptop, and I've updated it because first of all my Audio Dell does not open before then I completely uninstalled and rolled back my driver and now I've updated again now audio dell works but when I play media back in some places (e.g. youtube) the sound is stronger than its value and I turn up/down the volume and its fixed for that reading.

  Please help me or tell me that I am at least not alone with this...

  GOOD PLEASE DO NOT POST ON HERE, I GOT RID OF THE BAD FARM PROBLEM THIS QUESTION

• Automatically by turning and the wifi network?

  Is it possible to create a guest wifi network that automatically turns on market every day at certain times?

  Sorry, but no.

  However, there is a way to control the hours of each day that a wireless device would be authorized to connect to the Guest network.  For example, an iPad has to connect... Every day... Between... 08:00 and 22:00.  the iPad is not able to connect to any other time.

• Computer running much slower after a Windows Update.

  Windows Update problem

  This morning, I shut down my computer and installed the updates at the same time. When I switched back on it, he says that he has set up updates. He got 15% and then closes, rebooted and configured updates as usual. However, my computer runs much slower than usual. Any idea on how I can fix this? Thank you very much.

  Check your hard drive for errors:

  Click Start

  Type: CMD, according to the results, right-click CMD

  Click on "Run as Administrator"

  At the command prompt, type: chkdsk /f /r

  When you restart your system, your computer will be scanned for errors and will try to correct them.

  also:

  Click Start
  Type: CMD, according to the results, right-click CMD
  Click on "Run as Administrator"
  At the command prompt, type: sfc/scannow

  This will check for any breach of integrity

  Restart your system

• accelerate CFHTTP on CF10 (5000 x slower than under CF8)

  Hi, we have freshly installed a large application of CF8 to CF10 and see that CFHTTP performance is * much * slower on the new system.

  We've checked by sequentially 50 CFHTTP to the small static active calls running on an Apache Server, measure the response time with gettickcount() and averaging on several tracks.

  On the installation of our old (Ubuntu + JRun + CF 8), we are averaging about 1 ms per request.

  On our new (Centos + CF 10 standalone) installation, we are averaging 5000 ms per request. Is 5,000 times slower.

  Initially, we have assumed that this phenomenon was linked to questions of generation of entropy as the first query in a series of tests would be relatively fast back (a few hundred Ms total) compared to all requests to this term.  However, try to change the JVM settings as prescribed is not solved the problem.  We tried more far using entropy-generating alternative tools (such as recommended in the blog original post cities in the above thread), but that did not help either one.

  Note that we also tested performance outside CF http using wget from a shell script, where we have seen good performance (about 1 ms per request).

  Any help on this will be greatly appreciated, thanks!

  
  

  Update: just tested the CFHTTP CF + http://coldfusion9.blogspot.com/2012/03/custom-cfhttp-tag.html Java-based alternative

  It took a few minor bug fixes, but is greatly outperforming CFHTTP from CF 10, with an average of 33 ms by request (always much slower than CF 8, but can be used for most of the cases).  However, I always look for a solution restore speed appropriate for CFHTTP!

  Post edited by: Jon Obuchowski to add the test with the custom CFHTTP tag

  Thank you.  I have modified the code and added 2 additional calls to the CFC HTTPRequest and CFX_HTTP5.  (I had to also modify the CFC to activate applications without the URL/form vars).

  I tried this on ColdFusion 8, 9 & 10 Windows.  I shot 50 files of 5 different internal web servers.  (WARNING: the specifications are not the same for each server CF.)

  Here are the averages.

  10 ColdFusion CFHTTP: 9.04 CFC: 18,14 CFX_HTTP5: 1.26

  ColdFusion 9 CFHTTP: 8.08 CFC: CFX_HTTP5 158.92: 2.4

  ColdFusion 8 CFHTTP: 4.86 CFC: 149.14 CFX_HTTP5: 2.14

  I posted a blog in this regard entry and shared the CFML that I used to compare performance:

  http://gamesover2600.Tumblr.com/post/88683513184/ColdFusion-CFHttp-versus-httprequestcfc-v ersus