Difference between packages uc520

Similar Questions

• Difference between packages dbms_job and dbms_scheduler

  Hi all
  
  Can someone please tell me, what is the main difference between
  dbms_job and dbms_scheduler package.
  
  as I understand it, that is, using dbms_job we plan jobs.
  why we use dbms_scheduler job?
  
  Thank you
  Sanjeev.

  dbms_job
  Impossible to plan the o/s scripts.
  dbms_scheduler peut
  dbms_job does not retain the history and a copy of the log file in the database
  because of dbms_scheduler
  dbms_job can only schedule jobs at fixed intervals
  dbms_scheduler can use almost any planning.

  In short: dbms_scheduler has 200 percent more features than dbms_job and makes the windows scheduler and look very stupid of cron.

  ---------------
  Sybrand Bakker
  Senior Oracle DBA

• Difference between package flash.events and mx.events?

  Hello

  Can someone please let me know why there are two packages for flex events is flash.events and mx.events package?

  Please tell me what is the difference between a package flash.events and mx.events?

  Thanks in advance

  More generally, as far as I know, flash.events contains events associated with Flash Player (Flash and Flex joint) while mx.events contains the events in connection with the Flex framework.

• What are the major differences between packages and care Plans?

  Hello

  I want to do the parallel scenario planning & sequentially.

  Packages & load Plans are used to Parallel and sequential scheduling.

  I'm getting confused. What is the best for parallel & Scheduling sequentially?.

  To do this, what should I choose for planning, packages or support Plans?

  In what situations, we will use special & plans load packages?

  I tried to do this. I'm still confuse is...

  Please help me.

  Thanks in advance,

  A.Kavya.

  Might be useful to have a read of https://blogs.oracle.com/dataintegration/entry/what_s_new_with_oracle

  It has a 'Load Plans vs Packages' section that goes through the differences.

  See you soon

  John

• Difference between prefer application-packages in weblogic.xml and weblogic application. XML?

  Hello!

  When you deploy a WAR for WebLogic 10.3.5, what is the difference between the prefer-application-package element in the weblogic.xml and weblogic application files. XML?

  In my WARs WEB-INF/lib / I have a JAR that contains classes that are already provided by the container (but older versions).

  If I do not prefer-application-packages use my application gets then the classes provided by the container.

  If I use prefer-application-packages in weblogic.xml can I get classes in WAR/WEB-INF/lib, which is expected.

  But if I use prefer application-packages in weblogic - application.xml, then I get the versions of container. Why?

  Is there a difference between these two options?

  The exact data that I use are:

  (foo.bar. * is the name of the conflicting package;) Add or remove the linex tagged XXXX)

  WEB-INF/weblogic.xml:

  <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
  <wls:weblogic-web-app
      xmlns:wls="http://xmlns.oracle.com/weblogic/weblogic-web-app"
      xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
      xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/web-app_2_5.xsd http://xmlns.oracle.com/weblogic/weblogic-web-app http://xmlns.oracle.com/weblogic/weblogic-web-app/1.2/weblogic-web-app.xsd">
      <wls:container-descriptor>
          <wls:show-archived-real-path-enabled>true</wls:show-archived-real-path-enabled>
          <wls:prefer-application-packages> <!-- XXXX -->
              <wls:package-name>foo.bar.*</wls:package-name> <!-- XXXX -->
          </wls:prefer-application-packages> <!-- XXXX -->
          <wls:prefer-application-resources>
              <wls:resource-name>META-INF/services/some....</wls:resource-name>
              <wls:resource-name>META-INF/services/unrelated...</wls:resource-name>
              <wls:resource-name>META-INF/services/stuff...</wls:resource-name>
          </wls:prefer-application-resources>
      </wls:container-descriptor>
      <wls:jsp-descriptor>
          <wls:page-check-seconds>-1</wls:page-check-seconds>
          <wls:precompile>true</wls:precompile>
          <wls:precompile-continue>true</wls:precompile-continue>
          <wls:keepgenerated>true</wls:keepgenerated>
      </wls:jsp-descriptor>
      <wls:session-descriptor>
          <wls:persistent-store-type>replicated_if_clustered</wls:persistent-store-type>
      </wls:session-descriptor>
  </wls:weblogic-web-app>
  

  META-INF/weblogic - application.xml:

  <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
  <weblogic-application
      xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/weblogic/weblogic-application"
      xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
      xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/javaee_5.xsd http://xmlns.oracle.com/weblogic/weblogic-application http://xmlns.oracle.com/weblogic/weblogic-application/1.2/weblogic-application.xsd">
      <application-param>
          <param-name>webapp.encoding.default</param-name>
          <param-value>UTF-8</param-value>
      </application-param>
  
      <xml>
          <parser-factory>
              <saxparser-factory>
                  org.apache.xerces.jaxp.SAXParserFactoryImpl
              </saxparser-factory>
              <document-builder-factory>
                  org.apache.xerces.jaxp.DocumentBuilderFactoryImpl
              </document-builder-factory>
              <transformer-factory>
                  org.apache.xalan.processor.TransformerFactoryImpl
              </transformer-factory>
          </parser-factory>
      </xml>
  
      <prefer-application-packages>
          <package-name>foo.bar.*</package-name> <!-- XXXX -->
          <package-name>javax.jws.*</package-name>
          <package-name>javax.xml.ws.*</package-name>
          <package-name>org.apache.cxf.*</package-name>
          <package-name>antlr.*</package-name>
          <package-name>org.xmlsoap.schemas.wsdl.*</package-name>
      </prefer-application-packages>
  </weblogic-application>
  

  WebLogic - application.xml has no meaning in wars, it is only used in the ears.

• Hola! no self if alguien quiera Yes a bit of Asesoría, are as bastante confundido estoy... Queria long!  the difference existing between el PHOTOSHOP CC led package of FOTOGRAFIA y APPLICATION UNICA? that difference between ellos hay? are the same app

  Hola! no self if alguien quiera Yes a bit of Asesoría, are as bastante confundido estoy... Queria long!  the difference existing between el PHOTOSHOP CC led package of FOTOGRAFIA y APPLICATION UNICA? that difference between ellos hay? are the same cc photoshop application? because is offers mas barata in el FOTOGRAFIA package?

  photoshop and lightroom in the Pack of photographers are 100% identical as individual photoshop and lightroom different subscriptions (for much less cost).

  So yes, it is foolish to subscribe to only one photoshop or lightroom.  even if you're only going to use one of them, you should subscribe to the plan of photographers.

• What is the difference between the package from photography to Photoshop and Photoshop on his own? Photography Photoshop has the same capabilities as the single app?

  What is the difference between the package from photography to Photoshop and Photoshop on his own? Photography Photoshop has the same capabilities as the single app?

  Hello

  Greetings!

  Photography package to include Photoshop and Lightroom.

  However, if you choose Photoshop as a single application you get 20 GB of cloud while in terms of photography, you get 2 GB of cloud.

  Plan of photography is less expensive than the only application.

  Check here: https://creative.adobe.com/plans

  Concerning

  Jitendra

• I want to know what is the difference between the two packages to choose from for photoshop.

  Pricing plans and creative Cloud membership | Adobe Creative Cloud

  I am looking to buy photoshop and I see two sets with a price. There is a plan of photography that comes with photoshop cc for 119 a year, and then the other package is a purchase unique app for photoshop cc for 239 per year. They are both the same in photoshop?

  Hi domk15243449,

  Yes, you will get the same version of Photoshop on one of the Plans,

  Please see the following link, it should be useful: helps Photoshop | Differences between Photoshop and creative photography programs Cloud

  Kind regards

  Tanuj

• Difference between the use of IS and HAVE when creating a Package or procedure

  Hello
  
  Has had an interview in one of the company.
  
  They asked me that, "What is the difference between IS and as in the creation of package or Stored Procedure Usage?".
  
  I checked the package creation with same IS and YOU, but there is no problem.
  
  Kindly clarify me on this.
  
  Many thanks in advance.
  
  Kind regards
  Shiva

  961805 wrote:

  If this is the case, why oracle is allowing us to use and HAVE? Instead he could have allowed us to use AS single.

  No. I like IS more What did. Not to mention what the Ada (the mother of PL/SQL language), use.

  PL/SQL is allow that you use IS or ACE.

  A possible reason for PL/SQL support this, is influence of syntax for the SQL language. The ANSI SQL syntax uses YOU. And the SQL language can be used natively inside code PL, due to the integration of SQL, PL/SQL.

  Use IS or ACE.

  Many (?) use definitions of package fror YOU and IS for the definitions of the procedure and function. Not necessary from a perspective of language syntax, but serves to highlight the differences between a package signature and that of the procedures, functions, and methods.

• What is the difference between the function declared in the package and the CIP

  What is the difference between the definition of a function in the package and package body?
  
  Published by: user10641405 on November 19, 2009 13:29

  If you describe a package, you will see only the functions declared in the spec.
  If you declare only in the body but are not available to other packages (they are private to the package, non-public)

• Restoration - difference between erase (iPhone vs iTunes)

  We (me andChrisJ4203 ) were recently involved in a problem where the person had difficulty with a car with Bluetooth connection after unlocking

  Limitations of the iphone unlocked 6

  As we sifted through the questions: one thing that struck me.

  The person had used the command "Erase content and settings" to restore the phone

  Whenever I advise someone to do a restore - my reference is always using iTunes

  Where the question: is there a difference - OR should there be a difference in the results produced by each?

  (I was reading some old posts, who lamented a lack of in-depth technical discussions so that this came up - thinking, I could ask around)

  Thank you for all you would care to provide views

  -MS

  I'll offer an opinion for what it's worth:

  We will first consider restoring from iTunes method.  If we compare this to ' erase content and settings "followed by a restore of backup iTunes, I would say that the difference is restoring from iTunes combines some steps for the user, so they do not have to run each individually.  Basically, iTunes restore packages several stages together - erasure, then restore from backup.

  Restore from iCloud has a much harder time to make this packaging, as he must first clear content and settings to even offer the ability to restore a backup to iCloud.

  Finally, there is restore like new.  There are two ways to do this: one from iTunes and one from erasing content and settings.  So I think the iTunes method is just to be complete when the choice of a restore in iTunes, for the person to restore as a new, or restore from a backup in iTunes.

  In any case, the result is in my opinion, there is no technical difference between results for any specific 'restore from/as... ". ', differences only packaging how to present questions to the person performing the restore.

• Jack screw part number clarification: difference between 187949-01 and 187949-10

  We bought a few jack live, Mfr P/N 187949-10, but the parts are labeled 187949-01. What is the difference between-10 and -01. Are parts of the same, but differ only in the amount of packaging? Thank you.

  Hi Mwong,

  Thanks for the post and I hope that your well today - welcome to the Forums of NOR.

  I'm sorry to see that you have not yet received any support.

  Looking at the site, ni.com, here, I found this information,

  Specifications and manufacturers for Council mating of connectors

  http://digital.NI.com/public.nsf/allkb/8ECF4BAD615F18BC8625648400521E97

  (1) 4 piece Kit of screws for connection cables 187949-01 locking screw

  (10) 4 piece Kit of screws for connection cables 187949-10 locking screw

  That is why the differences between the 01 and 10 is the number of kits.

  However the link here.

  Specifications and Dimensions of the female connectors to screws used on 68 pins plug-in connectors

  http://digital.NI.com/public.nsf/allkb/43771DBD89FADB7B86256BC90053EC08

  "The kit contains 40 screws and washers (enough to convert the two ends of the).
  10 sets of cables). The part number of the kit is 187949-01 "

  But I guess that goes back to were you waiting for 1 or 10 sets?

  I hope this helps.

• Differences between models Aspire R7

  Can someone tell me exactly what are the differences between the R7 Aspire 572-6423 and the R7-572-54208G1Tass?  Also, which of these two is the newer model?  Thank you!

  Hello...

  Both are the same model with the same specifications sheet Aspire R7-572-6423

  Check the contents of the package in the datasheet, it is laptop Aspire R7-572-54208G1Tass.

• the difference between the w700-6407 and w700-6499 models?

  Please, I wanted to buy a Tablet w700?

  I wanted the best model of w700 with i5 and 128 GB, what is the number?

  in front of me w700-6407 both w700-6499?

  W700-6407 is on the website Canadian and said the same features, although there are some differences that I read as 8 hour battery.

  W700-6499 is the United States website says up to 9 hours battery, I don't know if it's true? should not be the same battery?

  I wonder if there other differences between them, the two tablets are at hand that I don't know what to buy? which is newer? I read that some models of ssd are faster than others?

  Please advise, and if there is no sheet that compares all models, since you produce too many models!

  Thank you

  The 3337u is the newer ' slightly ' 3317u and 100 mhz faster. The world real differece is negligible, as I had two versions W700. I think the turning point between if the price is equal would be watching the accesorries. 3317u model I had came with a leather case with a separate keyboard, while the version of 3337u came with a case of keyboard instead of the other case a keyboard, at least for the American package.

• Difference between model numbers

  I'm just curious to know what the difference is between flash drives of the same type with very similar model numbers. For example, I want to get a USB 2.0 Cruzer Glide 64 GB flash drive. Is there a functional difference between all the models that meet these specifications? I ask because of the change in the third and last group of alphanumeric characters in the model numbers. Examples:

  SDCZ60 - 064 G-CFAP

  SDCZ60 - 064G - A11

  SDCZ60 - 064G - A46

  SDCZ60 - 064G - B35

  The end of the Reference is the packaging code. This allows to determine what kind of package the product goes in, A11 is Americas retail packing, CFAP is Amazon Frustration free packaging (basically, it's just a paper Kraft envelope)