Direct NFS/CIFS connection with 1.4

Similar Questions

• The Web of LabVIEW user interface directly to the sensor with Ethernet connection

  Hello

  Is it possible to connect to the interface user Web of LabVIEW directly to a sensor with Ethernet connection?

  By directly, I mean without using any Web Service LabVIEW VI.

  Thank you

  Marcelo

  Hello

  The only communication with other devices using the Web user interface designer is through web services, either motorized or not LabVIEW. To connect with a sensor with the generator of the user Web interface without using LabVIEW, the sensing device must be accessible via HTTP and give you a way to read its data using XML web services based on.

• Poor ESXi 4 NFS Datastore Performance with various NAS systems

  Hello!

  In testing, I found that I get between a half and a quarter of the e/s inside a guest performance when ESXi 4 systems connect to the using NFS data store if the clients connect to the exact same NFS share.  However, I don't see this effect if the data store using iSCSI or local storage.  This has been reproduced with different systems running ESXi 4 and NAS systems.

  My test is very simple.  I created naked CentOS 5.4 minimum installation (completely updated 07/04/2010) with VMware Tools loaded and the creation time of a file of 256 MB using jj.  I create the file on the root (a VMDK stored in different data warehouses) partition or a directory of the NAS mounted via NFS, directly in the comments

  My crucial test configuration consists of a single test PC (Intel 3.0 GHz Core 2 Duo E8400 CPU with a single Intel 82567LM-3 Gigabit NC and 4 GB RAM) running ESXi 4 connected to a printer HP Procurve 1810 - 24 G, which is connected to a VIA EPIA M700 NAS system running OpenFiler 2.3 with two 1.5 to 7200 tr / MIN SATA disks configured in front of software RAID 1 and dual Gigabit Ethernet NIC.  However, I have reproduced it with different ESXi PC and NAS systems.

  This is a release of one of the tests.  In this case, the VMDK is a store of data stored on the NAS via NFS:

  -

  ---

  root@iridium /sync #; Sync; Sync; time {dd if = / dev/zero of = bs = 1 M count = test.txt 256 sync; sync; sync ;}}
  2560 records in
  2560 records out
  268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 0,524939 seconds, 511 MB/s
  Real 0m38.660s
  user 0m0.000s
  sys 0m0.566s
  root@iridium /# mount/mnt 172.28.19.16:/mnt/InternalRAID1/shares/VirtualMachines
  root@iridium /# cd/mnt
  synchronization of the # mnt root@iridium; Sync; Sync; time {dd if = / dev/zero of = bs = 1 M count = test.txt 256 sync; sync; sync ;}}
  2560 records in
  2560 records out
  268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 8,69747 seconds, 30.9 MB/s
  Real 0m9.060s
  user 0m0.001s
  sys 0m0.659s
  mnt root@iridium#.

  -

  ---

  The first dd is a VMDK stored in a connected via NFS data store.  The dd ends almost immediately, but the synchronization takes nearly 40 seconds!  It's less than 7 MB per second transfer rate: very slow.  Then I get the exact same NFS share that ESXi is used to store data directly in the comments and repeat the DD.  As you can see, the SD is longer and the synchronization takes no real time (as befits a NFS share with active sync), and the whole process takes less than 10 seconds: this is four times faster!

  I don't see these results on data warehouses mounted via NFS.  For example, here is a test on the guest even running from a mounted via iSCSI data store (using the exact same SIN):

  -

  ---

  root@iridium /sync #; Sync; Sync; time {dd if = / dev/zero of = bs = 1 M count = test.txt 256 sync; sync; sync ;}}
  2560 records in
  2560 records out
  268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 1,6913 seconds, 159 MB/s
  Real 0m7.745s
  user 0m0.000s
  sys 0m1.043s

  
  root@iridium /# mount/mnt 172.28.19.16:/mnt/InternalRAID1/shares/VirtualMachines
  root@iridium /# cd/mnt
  synchronization of the # mnt root@iridium; Sync; Sync; time {dd if = / dev/zero of = bs = 1 M count = test.txt 256 sync; sync; sync ;}}
  2560 records in
  2560 records out
  268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 8,66534 seconds, 31.0 MB/s
  Real 0m9.081s
  user 0m0.001s
  sys 0m0.794s
  mnt root@iridium#.

  -

  ---

  And the same comments linking internal SATA drive of the PC ESXi:

  -

  ---

  root@iridium /sync #; Sync; Sync; time {dd if = / dev/zero of = bs = 1 M count = test.txt 256 sync; sync; sync ;}}
  2560 records in
  2560 records out
  268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 6,77451 seconds, 39.6 Mbps
  Real 0m7.631s
  user 0m0.002s
  sys 0m0.751s
  root@iridium /# mount/mnt 172.28.19.16:/mnt/InternalRAID1/shares/VirtualMachines
  root@iridium /# cd/mnt
  synchronization of the # mnt root@iridium; Sync; Sync; time {dd if = / dev/zero of = bs = 1 M count = test.txt 256 sync; sync; sync ;}}
  2560 records in
  2560 records out
  268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 8,90374 seconds, 30.1 MB/s
  Real 0m9.208s
  user 0m0.001s
  sys 0m0.329s
  mnt root@iridium#.

  -

  ---

  As you can see, the performance of NFS direct comments for each of the three are very consistent.  ISCSI and the performance of the store local data disk are both a bit better than that - as I expect.  But the mounted via NFS data store gets only a fraction of the perfomance of the any of them.  Obviously, something is wrong.

  I was able to reproduce this effect with an Iomega Ix4 - 200 d as well.  The difference is not as dramatic, butalways important and consistent.  Here is a test of a guest of CentOS using a VMDK stored in a data store provided by an Ix4 - 200 d via NFS:-.

  root@palladium /sync #; Sync; Sync; time {dd if = / dev/zero of = bs = 1 M count = test.txt 256 sync; sync; sync ;}}
  2560 records in
  2560 records out
  268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 11,1253 seconds, 24.1 Mbps
  Real 0m18.350s
  user 0m0.006s
  sys 0m2.687s
  root@palladium /# mount/mnt 172.20.19.1:/nfs/VirtualMachines
  root@palladium /# cd/mnt
  synchronization of the # mnt root@Palladium; Sync; Sync; time {dd if = / dev/zero of = bs = 1 M count = test.txt 256 sync; sync; sync ;}}
  2560 records in
  2560 records out
  268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 9,91849 seconds, 27.1 MB/s
  Real 0m10.088s
  user 0m0.002s
  sys 0m2.147s root@palladium mnt-#.

  -

  ---

  Once more, the direct NFS mount gives very consistent results.  But using the diskette provided by ESXi on a mounted NFS datastore gives still worse results.  They are not as terrible as OpenFiler test results, but they are constantly between 60% and 100% longer.

  Why is this?  What I've read, NFS performace is supposed to be within a few percent of the iSCSI performance, and yet I see between 60% and 400% worse performance.  And this isn't a case of the SIN is not able to provide correct NFS performance.  When I connect to the NAS via NFS directly inside the guest, I see much better than when ESXi connects to the same NAS (the same proportion!) via NFS.

  The configuration of ESXi (network and network cards) is 100% stock.  There is no VLAN in place, etc., and ESXi system has only one

  Single Gigabit adapter.  It is certainly not optimal, but it doesn't seem to me to be able to explain why a virtualized guest is able to get a lot better performance NFS as ESXi itself to the same NAS.  After all, they both use the same exact suboptimal network configuration...

  Thank you very much for your help.  I would be grateful any idea or advice, you might be able to give me.

  Hi all

  It is very definitely a performance O_Sync problem. It is well known that NFS VMware shops still use O_Sync for writes little matter what share put for a default value. VMware uses a custom file locking system so you really can't compare it to a normal NFS share connection to a different NFS client.

  I have validated that the performance will be good if you have an SSD cache or storage target with enough reliable battery backup.

  http://blog.laspina.ca/ubiquitous/running-ZFS-over-NFS-as-a-VMware-store

  Kind regards

  Mike

  vExpert 2009

• In a roaming network, Mac always connects with AE which is further away

  So, I had a roaming network for years to host a detached office which was too far from my house.  Worked very well.  Now, my family and I have moved into a temporary rented condo (two floors).  Therefore, there is a lot of wifi networks in the area in conflict with.

  After trying to extend the network (signal too low in the area), I decided to try the roaming network again.  Most of the time, it works very well.  But from time to time, my iMac (on the ground floor) connects with the Airport Extreme, which is on the floor instead of the Airport Express, which is down in the same room as the iMac.  What happens when it connects to the Airport Extreme on the floor, my Tx rate drops to less than 100 Mbps (sometimes dramatically if) and I am unable to listen to the music to my Airport Express without dropouts.

  The dressing was to turn off my wifi on the iMac, and then turn it back on.  It will then connect to the Airport Express.   The problem is that I have to do this in general once a day as my iMac will enter into the "standby" and periodically reconnect with Airport Extreme when I wake up (or if I re-enable it if off).  Ideally, he would stay with the Airport Express.

  So I hope that there is an alternative.  I thought about simply renaming the Airport Express network in the different name of Airport Extreme.  But all the itinerant instructions whereby I know that network names must be the same for all airports in the roaming network.  But perhaps this is not the case.

  Comments are appreciated!

  Unfortunately, you encounter a known issue with the use of a roaming network... and it is not specific to those provided by Apple either. The "solution" you use, although not elegant, is basically everything with that we have (at this time) to go.

  In theory, your iMac fixed, must always connect to the Wi - Fi with the signal network hard... not necessarily the closest to it. It may be possible, since you mentioned that you live in a highly congested environment Wi - Fi, your iMac is struggling to determine the right network to connect to when starting.

  Of course, a more "permanent" solution for your iMac, at least, would connect directly to the nearest base by Ethernet station.

• Connection with Hulu with ATV 4, is impossible.

  It is impossible to connect with Hulu with ATV 4,!. Can do with the iPad Air2 without problem. Using the same DNS settings on both. I can directly airplay Hulu at ATV4, but not the ATV. Help please!

  DNS settings being that the same are not a guarantee that they are correct, you need to use the settings provided by your ISP, so just to leave them on auto. What exactly happens when you try to watch. You use the settings to the correct location.

• FPT-AG03 3D glasses does not connect with TV 48T5445DG

  Hey,.

  I hope you can help me with my problem.
  A few weeks ago I bought a new TV LDC (48T5445DG) with the 3D feature. With the TV came the FPT-AG03 glasses, so I think that they have to adapt.
  But I am not able to connect with the TV - they are just blinks for a few minutes and then stop.
  3D images are correctly shown on the TV.

  I searched for hours on google, read the manual several times - but no answer. I tried all options to solve this problem - changing the batteries, bought a new Highspeed HDMI Cable, stop the WLAN in the region, hold the glass directly in front of the TV, then a few centimeters, and then one or two meters. But always the same red blinking light.

  I hope you can help me, market where I bought the PC is far away and I don't have a car to get there.
  Thank you and greetings from the Germany,
  Tobias.

  I have exactly the same here...
  Another thing, it seems very fragile - is a nice neat way to open the housing of loader of these glasses?

• Connectivity with AT & T-Motorola 3360 and Airport Extreme problems

  Bought a new extreme-Airport (7.7.3) to replace my old AE after 9 years of service.  The installation procedure, but could not get the airport to connect with my modem (Motorola 3360).  Called at & T and they crossed put me the modem in Bridge mode and which seemed to work.  But only temporarily (about 5 hours).  Restart the modem and the airport was not working.  Troubleshooting I tried to plug my MacBook directly into the modem, but even the computer couldn't get an internet connection.  Another call to AT & T and they reconfigure the modem to their end.  After 90 minutes and try everything they could, they have finally admitted defeat and told me that they could not solve the problem.

  However, after a fairly exhaustive search of this forum, seems to be two issues that many people is with Airport extreme.  One is that the modem (in this case a Motorola 3360) is perhaps not fully compatible with the airport.  The AT & T support person was not aware of this until I asked about it, so she did a quick search and was rather surprised to see that there is a lot of people having problems with the Motorola Modem.  She told me that they use no more Motorola modems but ship the 6200 of Netgear.  "All know issues?", I asked.  She sought and, to his surprise, even once, there was.

  So, first question.  Does anyone know a modem that is compatible with the airport or use one that they had to limit problems with?

  The second question prevailing seems to be with the IPv6 protocol.  Anyone know if there are problems with the AT & T IPv6 protocol and the most extreme airport?  I did not disable IPv6 yet to see if that helps.  I thought I'd ask here first.  Couldn't find anything on the AT & T site.

  When I return from the road (great place to go to get away from technology) I will make a new round of full power of all the components and try Setup again from scratch.

  Any ideas or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.  Miss all know profanity.

  Thank you.

  Any other relevant information: 6.3.1 the utility Airport, Airport Extreme 7.7.3, MacBook Pro running 10.8.4, modem Motorola 3360, AT & T high speed DSL, shoe size 11-1/2 wide.

  When you have configured the 3360 as a 'bridge', this would mean that the AirPort Extreme should then be put in place to provide the PPPoE connection service. The airports are not known for their reliability in this type of installation... no matter the type of modem that you can select, so I drop this method as a connection option.

  If you want to keep the 3360... and you have time to experiment... then you can set the 3360 to its original default settings and configure the router from the airport most convenient to connect using DHCP in router Mode of DHCP and NAT.  That will produce what is called a message Double NAT, but maybe it's not of concern on a simple home network, and Apple provides you with the option 'Ignore' the Double NAT, so the airport will display a green light instead a light orange blinking slow.

  You need to try this configuration for a few days to see if the Double NAT will be a problem or not, because it is not possible to predict the effect of a Double NAT on a network... you have to test a few days see how things behave.  If this configuration works well, for you, then you can leave it as what.

  Please note that I do not recommend this type of installation, just suggesting it as an option this work could , if you want to keep the 3360.

  How Double NAT affect IPv6, I can't tell, since I did not use att for several years, and I'm not familiar with their implementation. On wired, IPv6 works fine on the airport with Comcast and Time Warner.  We can provide these parameters for you if want, but have no idea how well... (or if)... they will work with ATT.

  If the installation of Double NAT does not work, your best option would be to go there and get a modem/router or gateway to ATT device and then set up the most convenient airport in Bridge Mode works correctly with the modem/router ATT.  You will turn on the routing of ATT function in this type of installation, but the airport can also produce a signal from the wireless network that you can use.  The modem/router ATT will also provide a wireless signal that you could use for guests, or disable the feature, if you do not need two wireless networks.

  This may also be the best option if you want to configure IPv6 as IPv6 of ATT service must be compatible with the modems/routers and gateways.

• my phone does not work after last update itunes on my phone connection with my pc, it shows only i tunes icon and the application of itune on my pc does not work

  my phone does not work after last update itunes on my phone connection with my pc, it shows only i tunes icon and the application of itune on my pc does not work

  For general advice, see troubleshooting problems with iTunes for Windows updates.

  The steps described in the second case are a guide to remove everything related to iTunes and then rebuild what is often a good starting point, unless the symptoms indicate a more specific approach.

  Review the other boxes and other support documents list to the bottom of the page, in case one of them applies.

  More information area has direct links with the current and recent buildings if you have problems to download, must revert to an older version or want to try the version of iTunes for Windows (64-bit-for old video cards) as a workaround for problems with installation or operation, or compatibility with QuickTime software or a third party.

  Backups of your library and device should be affected by these measures but there are links to backup and recovery advice there.

  Once iTunes to work properly, you should be able to fix your device.

  TT2

• Is it possible to connect with FACEBOOK Customer / Tech Support? I got my ID stolen FB and I can't connect with a living soul!

  Is it possible to connect with FACEBOOK Customer / Tech Support? I got my FB ID stolen and I can't connect with a living soul! I'm really tired of FACEBOOK and ZUCKERBERG, boasts getting its 1 billionth Member, meanwhile, its members have problems with scams, hackers, even FACEBOOK is now BANNING people for the addition of family and friends! This must be a scam any seriously! Im sick of him, he turned my whole as for social networks. If it wasn't for the fact that I have almost all of my family in Europe and around the world all in one place, I would certainly remove my account. The problem with that is if you delete your FACEBOOK PROFILE, you don't actually remove them. FB keeps them because they are the property of Facebook the minute climb you the post! This information is in the conditions of joining Facebook, but not on the registration page! that is wrong with this picture. THEY HAVE NO SUPPORT, NO CUSTOMER SUPPORT, IT IS Y HAS NO PHONE NUMBER YOU CAN CALL TO REPORT YOUR STOLEN ID AND NOW I HAVE TO ALL RUN IT AROUND TO TRY TO FIND A CYBER CRIME UNIT WHO WILL HELP ME! How can the other thing, I know if Mytechgurus.com is a legitimate business. As I've been hacked and my ID stolen (curiously enough all what's happened just as I was banned from Facebook to add a friend, I've not seen in 36 years.) They have deleted my friendship with her and banned me for 7 days)! Facebook. MyTechGurus.com have charged me $700.00 for 2 pc for serivce of 24/7 for 2 years. Granted they have always been there in the last 6 weeks to help with all the problems that the pirate had created. They've phoned while I had a technician remote access online help with verbal information as it was a huge problem. but I put it back now because a governing body here in Australia called SCAM WATCH who is supposed to tell you who is a scam and is not was good enough to tell me that they are there only to report a scam, they can not physically tell you if one of them is actually a scam or not! I was left to literally chasing my own tail! HE IS THERE ANYONE TO HELP ME AT ALL!

  Hello

  Sorry, we can not help except at the point you in the right direction.

  The Microsoft Community is a site of support of peer reviewed for Windows
  and some Microsoft Products and has absolutely no connection or influence
  with Facebook.

  Rob - SpiritX

• Outlook express hangs after the connection with the mail server

  OE6 hangs after the connection with the mail server?

  Make sure that the other machine is not check that the server so often a machine is not problems because it cannot be verified.

  Try to delete the account, compact the folders and close OE and reopen it and add the account back again.  Also make sure that the antivirus software is not interfere (see www.oehelp.com/OETips.aspx#3).

  You can also telnet to the server directly from this computer to see if it works (see http://techhelp.santovec.us/pop3telnet.htm).

  Sometimes it gets stuck in a message on the server and it can not get downloaded by OE, so it may be necessary to remove the message from the server, but if the other machine got, maybe it's not the question.

  Steve

• Vista Wi - Fi connected with limited access

  I can't connect to the internet.  My shows of WiFi - connected with limited access.  When I view the status of wireless network connection - it shows IPv4 and Ipv6 not connected.

  This suggests even more than the fastest and the best option you have is to contact the ISP and have them help you with the installation and check all devices (including their and their connection to your location).  You can fight with various alternatives that may or may not work because we are not sufficiently familiar with your Installer, equipment or requirement of ISP, or you can go directly to them and I'm reasonably sure they'll have you facing up and running without delay (assuming that it is not a hardware problem or something at their end).

  The decision is yours.

  Good luck!

  Lorien - MCSA/MCSE/network + / has + - if this post solves your problem, please click the 'Mark as answer' or 'Useful' button at the top of this message. Marking a post as answer, or relatively useful, you help others find the answer more quickly.

• direct tcp socket connection over wifi

  Hi people,

  I am trying to establish a direct connection over wifi with the last 4.7.0 JDE, Simulator tests (9530) and my bb Bold. I am trying to connect with a code similar to the following:

  import javax.microedition.io.Connector;import javax.microedition.io.StreamConnection;
  
  String URL = "socket://192.168.1.88:31339;interface=wifi;deviceside=true";
  
  connection = (StreamConnection)Connector.open(URL);
  

  But I'm not having any luck. I have that (to reading the documentation) this interface addition = wifi & deviceside = true for the connection string was all it takes. Am I missing something obvious here?

  I presume that you have reviewed the video of transport network:

  http://www.BlackBerry.com/DevMediaLibrary/view.do?name=NetworkingTransports

  You'll find that a number of WiFi on the threads on this forum, which contain interesting information.  I suggest that consult you these.  There are others, but I think that your questions are answered in these.

  http://supportforums.BlackBerry.com/Rim/Board/message?board.ID=java_dev&message.ID=16000

  http://supportforums.BlackBerry.com/Rim/Board/message?board.ID=java_dev&thread.ID=898

• How to connect with Adobe Media Server random remote Shared Object

  Hello, I have my application on the web developed in Flash Professional CC and exported to Flash Player 13.

  In my web app, I have 2 classes: connection (which creates the connection with my Adobe Media Server) and GlobalObject (that creates the remote shared object).

  This is the code I have:

  Connection class

  import flash.events.AsyncErrorEvent;

  import flash.events.Event;

  import flash.events.IOErrorEvent;

  import flash.events.SecurityErrorEvent;

  import flash.events.SyncEvent;

  import flash.events.NetStatusEvent;

  import flash.net.NetConnection;

  import flash.net.ObjectEncoding;

  import flash.net.SharedObject;

  var nc:NetConnection = new NetConnection();

  nc.objectEncoding = ObjectEncoding.AMF3;

  NC.client = this;

  nc.proxyType = "best";

  nc.addEventListener (NetStatusEvent.NET_STATUS, netSAServerRTMPStatus);

  nc.addEventListener (IOErrorEvent.IO_ERROR, onIOError);

  nc.addEventListener (AsyncErrorEvent.ASYNC_ERROR, asyncErrorHandler);

  nc.addEventListener (SecurityErrorEvent.SECURITY_ERROR, onSecurityError);

  NC. Connect ("rtmp://myAMS_URL:1935 / myApp", "myRandomChannel");

  var _ro:GlobalObject;

  function onIOError(e:IOErrorEvent):void

  {

  trace ("onIOError");

  }

  function asyncErrorHandler(e:AsyncErrorEvent):void

  {

  trace ("asyncErrorHandler =" + e.error);

  }

  function onSecurityError(e:SecurityError):void

  {

  trace ("onSecurityError =" + e.error);

  }

  function netSAServerRTMPStatus(event:NetStatusEvent):void

  {

  Switch (info.code)

  {

  case "NetConnection.Connect.Success":

  trace ("Connected");

  ConnectToSharedObject();

  by default:

  trace (e.info.code);

  break;

  }

  }

  function ConnectToSharedObject (): void

  {

  _ro = new GlobalObject();

  var randomRO:Number = Math.Random ();

  _ro. Connect (randomRO, nc, false);

  trace (_ro. Connected);

  If (_ro. Connected is true)

  {

  _ro.addEventListener ("onNewMsg", onNewMsg);

  _ro.sendNewMsg ("hello");

  }

  }

  function onNewMsg(e:Event):void

  {

  trace (e.Target.chatMsg);

  }

  GlobalObject class

  import flash.events.AsyncErrorEvent;

  import flash.events.Event;

  import flash.events.EventDispatcher;

  import flash.events.SyncEvent;

  import flash.net.NetConnection;

  import flash.net.ObjectEncoding;

  import flash.net.SharedObject;

  var so: SharedObject;

  var connected: Boolean;

  var _msg:String;

  function GlobalObject()

  {

  Super();

  }

  function connect(p_soName:String,_p_nc:NetConnection,_p_persistant:Boolean):void

  {

  create StoredObject

  So = SharedObject.getRemote (p_soName, p_nc.uri, p_persistant);

  so.client = this;

  Configure the onSync events

  so.addEventListener (SyncEvent.SYNC, onSync);

  connect to the SO

  so. Connect (p_nc);

  connected = true

  }

  function logout (): void

  {

  so. Close();

  }

  function onSync(evt:SyncEvent):void

  {

  trace ("onSync");

  }

  public void sendNewMsg(msg:String):void

  {

  so. Send ("mewMsg", msg);

  }

  function mewMsg(msg:String):void

  {

  _msg = msg;

  dispatchEvent (new Event ("onNewMsg", _msg));

  }

  The problem is that I have ever received the 'onSync' event, then, so I never got the messages. What I am doing wrong? I have to add or change?

  I have no code (C:\ProgramFiles\Adobe\AdobeMediaServer5\applications\myApp) server-side. All this code is compiled and exported as a SWF file, and this is the file that the user charge when go to my Web page.

  Hope someon could help me.

  Best regards

  Manel

  Hello

  The problem is solved! The point is that the AMS folder that I created were defined as 'direct' default app. Once I changed that, it work corretly.

  Best regards

• Unable to connect with vSphere WebClient on https

  Hello

  After the upgrade of tot ESXi 5.5 5.5 ESXi update 2 that I can't connect to the host with vSphere Web Client.

  I get the following message:

  RSL https://localhost:9443/vSphere-client/locales/RSL/Flex-common-lib-5.5.0.swf Failed to load. Error #2032

  I already tried this: http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US & cmd = displayKC & externalId = 2060114

  I am able to connect with VMWare vSphere Client

  
  

  Can someone point me in the right direction to solve this problem?

  
  

  Thanks in advance,

  
  
  Eric

  Hello

  It seems that the solution to this question is very simple. Just search with the right criteria.

  Sorry for that.

  The solution is to delete the cache of the browser you are using to connect to the host.

  But now the following problem occurs.

  Once connected using a windows session. I do not see my host, nor of the vm on it.

  I hope someone can help.

  Eric

• Best practices for client internal connectivity with Horizon view 6

  Hi all

  I saw configuration with a server connection and security.  Internal clients connect directly on the connection to the authentication server, while the external clients through the Security server.  Recently, one of my friends and I had to discuss our configurations.  It has all of its traffic to the Security server.  Its installer seems to be supported by the latest diagrams in the view documentation 6.  What is the best practice?

  Thank you!

  I can certainly see how this diagram is confusing, but it is intended to show the internal clients through directly load balancing to servers connection. If you look at the architecture guide and white papers, they are all show internal clients without going through the security servers.