Disable "Record results" in texteditor

Similar Questions

• Programmatically disable the record result

  I am creating a user of Visual Studio c# application, and I want to disable the result of registration in certain circumstances.

  Currently, I put the engine of the Application Manager. DisableResults to true in my application from Visual Studio, but that changes the setting configured at all times (when I open the TestStand sequence editor, set it up |) Station options | Execution | Disable recording of results of all sequences is changed).

  I am looking for a solution that can be called from my Visual Studio application that disables the result of recording before execution of the sequence, but does not change the State of the installed product TestStand.

  Be very specific on objects that you manage. Otherwise, you will end up with a bizarre and unexpected behavior.

  Have you had the chance to attend class NI TS 2?

  If so, please see the chapter on the TS API.

  If not, I give you a few tips:

  -An object of type 'File of sequence' (general) contains one or more objects of type "Sequence".

  -An object of type 'Séquence' (general) contains one or more objects of type 'Step '.

  -Both the 'Séquence' and 'Step' object have a property that holds the information if TS must collect the result of step of the sequence.

  -For the stage, it would be 'ResultOption' (default 1, disable-0 online)

  -For the sequence, it would be RecordResults (default TRUE, disable-online FALSE)

  Note that some properties of objects can be 'hidden '. You can enable the display of hidden properties by configuring TS ' > preferences show hidden properties "check box.

  Norbert

• record result only if the step fails

  Hello

  It is possible to specify that a step should only appear in the results if the status is DOWN and not when it MEETS the test?

  It seems that you can only enable or disable the result for a step!

  Thank you!

  John.

  Hello

  If the response from Dennis will be full fill your needs then ignores this.

  If you want to match an only special stage then I would add a statement after that

  a process that removes the last element - Step.ResultList neck of prerequisite at this stage.

  Jürgen

• calculate the balance depends on the previous record result

  Hello
  I have a requirement like calculating the balance depends on the previous record result. but I'm unable to accomplish by using select statement.
  

  Sample data:
  
  WITH T AS (SELECT 10 AMOUNT, 0.2 PERCENT  FROM DUAL
             UNION ALL 
             SELECT 11 AMOUNT, 0.3 PERCENT  FROM DUAL
             UNION ALL 
             SELECT 12 AMOUNT, 0.3 PERCENT  FROM DUAL
             UNION ALL 
             SELECT 13 AMOUNT, 0.3 PERCENT  FROM DUAL
             UNION ALL 
             SELECT 14 AMOUNT, 0.3 PERCENT  FROM DUAL
            )

  process:          
  10(AMOUNT)  *  0.2(PERCENT)  = 2
  11 - 2(Result of previous calculation) = 9
  12 - 9(Result of previous calculation) = 3
  13 -3(Result of previous calculation) = 10
  14 - 10(Result of previous calculation) = 4;

  required output.
   AMOUNT                 RESULT  
    10                          2
    11                          9
    12                          3
    13                         10
    14                          4

  Please, help me build the select statement.

  There is no order in the lines of the relational table. Only ORDER BY guarantees the order. So, even if the AMOUNT is increasing in your sample, I guess in life real amounts are in no particular order. If Yes, you need another column indicating the order of the lines:

  WITH T AS (
             SELECT 1 ID, 10 AMOUNT, 0.2 PERCENT  FROM DUAL UNION ALL
             SELECT 2 ID, 11 AMOUNT, 0.3 PERCENT  FROM DUAL UNION ALL
             SELECT 3 ID, 12 AMOUNT, 0.3 PERCENT  FROM DUAL UNION ALL
             SELECT 4 ID, 13 AMOUNT, 0.3 PERCENT  FROM DUAL UNION ALL
             SELECT 5 ID, 14 AMOUNT, 0.3 PERCENT  FROM DUAL
            )
  SELECT  AMOUNT,
          RESULT
    FROM  T
    MODEL
      DIMENSION BY(ID)
      MEASURES(AMOUNT,AMOUNT RESULT,PERCENT)
      RULES(
            RESULT[1]                  = RESULT[1] * PERCENT[1],
            RESULT[ID > 1] ORDER BY ID = RESULT[CV()] - RESULT[CV() - 1]
           )
    ORDER BY ID
  /
  
      AMOUNT     RESULT
  ---------- ----------
          10          2
          11          9
          12          3
          13         10
          14          4
  
  SQL> 
  

  If the AMOUNT is still growing:

  WITH T AS (
             SELECT 10 AMOUNT, 0.2 PERCENT  FROM DUAL UNION ALL
             SELECT 11 AMOUNT, 0.3 PERCENT  FROM DUAL UNION ALL
             SELECT 12 AMOUNT, 0.3 PERCENT  FROM DUAL UNION ALL
             SELECT 13 AMOUNT, 0.3 PERCENT  FROM DUAL UNION ALL
             SELECT 14 AMOUNT, 0.3 PERCENT  FROM DUAL
            )
  SELECT  AMOUNT,
          RESULT
    FROM  T
    MODEL
      DIMENSION BY(ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY AMOUNT) ID)
      MEASURES(AMOUNT,AMOUNT RESULT,PERCENT)
      RULES(
            RESULT[1]                  = RESULT[1] * PERCENT[1],
            RESULT[ID > 1] ORDER BY ID = RESULT[CV()] - RESULT[CV() - 1]
           )
    ORDER BY ID
  /
  
      AMOUNT     RESULT
  ---------- ----------
          10          2
          11          9
          12          3
          13         10
          14          4
  
  SQL> 
  

  SY.

• SQL MORE: printscreen off or disable display result

  Hi all
  
  I am using sqlplus that accompanies the new oracle 11g release 1... Anyone know how I can disable myscreen to display the result of a query?
  I do not want to write in a file-just do not print output to the screen... I run a query where all I need is just the time spent and not the result because I join millions of records.
  
  Thank you and happy holidays

  SQL> SET AUTOTRACE TRACEONLY
  
  SQL> SET TIMING ON
  
  SQL> SELECT * FROM dba_objects;
  
  9656 rows selected.
  
  Elapsed: 00:00:00.13
  
  Execution Plan
  ----------------------------------------------------------
  Plan hash value: 2127761497
  
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  | Id  | Operation                 | Name          | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT            |          |     8764 |     1514K|       39   (3)| 00:00:01 |
  |   1 |  VIEW                      | DBA_OBJECTS |     8764 |     1514K|       39   (3)| 00:00:01 |
  |   2 |   UNION-ALL                 |          |          |          |            |          |
  |*  3 |    FILTER                 |          |          |          |            |          |
  |*  4 |     HASH JOIN                 |          |     9815 |      872K|       37   (3)| 00:00:01 |
  |   5 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL            | USER$          |       27 |      459 |        2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
  |*  6 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL            | OBJ$          |     9815 |      709K|       34   (0)| 00:00:01 |
  |*  7 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| IND$          |        1 |        7 |        2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
  |*  8 |      INDEX UNIQUE SCAN            | I_IND1      |        1 |          |        1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
  |   9 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | LINK$          |        1 |       88 |        0   (0)| 00:00:01 |
  |  10 |     NESTED LOOPS            |          |        1 |      105 |        2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
  |  11 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL            | USER$          |       27 |      459 |        2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
  |* 12 |      INDEX RANGE SCAN            | I_LINK1     |        1 |          |        0   (0)| 00:00:01 |
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
  ---------------------------------------------------
  
     3 - filter("O"."TYPE#"<>1 AND "O"."TYPE#"<>10 OR "O"."TYPE#"=1 AND  (SELECT 1 FROM
             "SYS"."IND$" "I" WHERE "I"."OBJ#"=:B1 AND ("I"."TYPE#"=1 OR "I"."TYPE#"=2 OR
             "I"."TYPE#"=3 OR "I"."TYPE#"=4 OR "I"."TYPE#"=6 OR "I"."TYPE#"=7 OR "I"."TYPE#"=9))=1)
     4 - access("O"."OWNER#"="U"."USER#")
     6 - filter("O"."NAME"<>'_NEXT_OBJECT' AND "O"."NAME"<>'_default_auditing_options_'
             AND "O"."LINKNAME" IS NULL)
     7 - filter("I"."TYPE#"=1 OR "I"."TYPE#"=2 OR "I"."TYPE#"=3 OR "I"."TYPE#"=4 OR
             "I"."TYPE#"=6 OR "I"."TYPE#"=7 OR "I"."TYPE#"=9)
     8 - access("I"."OBJ#"=:B1)
    12 - access("L"."OWNER#"="U"."USER#")
  
  Statistics
  ----------------------------------------------------------
         0  recursive calls
         0  db block gets
         2978  consistent gets
         0  physical reads
         0  redo size
       538818  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
         7541  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
       645  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
         0  sorts (memory)
         0  sorts (disk)
         9656  rows processed
  

• Qosmio F10-122: QosmioPlayer 4.0.1 - TV disabled recording

  I have a Qosmio F10-122 with QosmioPlayer version 4.0.1 (2005022812) (according to the procedure of the forum) has installed fine.
  I can see the tv, but when I press record it says: function disabled.
  There is a limit of harware F10/G10 and I need a F20/G20 (or higher) or is it a problem of version of software?

  In the latter case, the upgrade?

  Hello

  QosmioPlayer 4.0.1 is designed for your laptop model? Have you found that it listed for your laptop model?

• Disable UUT result Popup after DUT finished

  Hello

  I want to automatically test a sequence x times. I have a labview.vi that count the number of the object to measure up, so I don't have to set each time the number by myself. But after each sequence / use I need to check the popup DUT result to start the next sequence / use.

  Is it possible to disable this popup that UUT following can operate automatically if the last finished?

  I use Teststand 2010.

  You can use the PostUUT/PreUUT callbacks.

• Record results of Windows 7 Explorer

  When I search a file on my computer, I get results that include files and folders. If I double-click on a folder, it opens the folder, but I lose the context where the folder is located. In windows XP, the address bar would display the current location of the folder. Now, he said only: "search results in...» "and if I click on the address bar I get unwanted URL-coded. So my question.

  Is there a way either:

  (1) at the current location of the file always appear in the address bar?, or

  (2) have automatically navigate to the location of the folder in the folders on the left pane?

  I have my settings file set to "Automatically expand to current folder" and "display the full path in the title bar." None of these work.

  I don't know how to make only one click is needed, but if you right click on any file to search results or a folder, you can choose "open file location" (or open folder location) in the menu that appears, so I think that what you want is feasible in two clicks anyway.

• MAF - Disable recording of errors

  Hello, I have a MAF application in prod and I would like to know if there is anything that I could turn off logging for the version release.

  I put the debugging into 'false' in maf.properties.

  I don't want the app to create the log file myAPKName.txt.

  My logging.properties:

  # by default the newspaper using the ConsoleHandler

  . handlers = java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler

  # by default the newspaper to use the SimpleFormatter

  . formatter = java.util.logging.SimpleFormatter

  level of # default ConsoleHandler record to SEVERUS

  oracle.adfmf.util.logging.ConsoleHandler.level = SEVERE

  oracle.adfmf.util.logging.ConsoleHandler.formatter = oracle.adfmf.util.logging.PatternFormatter

  oracle.adfmf.util.logging.PatternFormatter.pattern=[%LEVEL% - LOGGER CLASS - % - % METHOD] MESSAGE %

  the recorder of framework to use only the ConsoleHandler of #configure adfmf

  oracle.adfmf.framework.useParentHandlers = false

  Oracle.adfmf.Framework.Handlers = Oracle.adfmf.util.Logging.ConsoleHandler

  Oracle.adfmf.Framework.Level = Severe

  #configure the application log to use only the ConsoleHandler adfmf

  oracle.adfmf.application.useParentHandlers = false

  Oracle.adfmf.application.Handlers = Oracle.adfmf.util.Logging.ConsoleHandler

  Oracle.adfmf.application.Level = Severe

  and my maf.properties

  # Debugging Java settings

  Java.Debug.Enabled = False

  # Specifies the value of the whole of the port to use when debugging

  Java.Debug.port = 8000

  # Debugging JavaScript settings

  JavaScript.Debug.Enabled = False

  # Settings for the memory default segment size

  # see http://docs.Oracle.com/JavaME/config/CDC/CDC-opt-impl/ojmeec/1.0/runtime/HTML/CVM.htm

  Java.CommandLine.argument =-Xms50M

  Java.CommandLine.argument =-Xmn25M

  Java.CommandLine.argument =-Xmx125M

  # Specifies the function that will trigger the activation of JavaScript debugging

  #javascript.debug.feature = featureId:port

  Thanks for your help!

  Hello

  try to add the following in the adf - config.xml:

  http://xmlns.Oracle.com/ADF/config/properties">

  Kind regards
  Ognjen

• Unexpected behavior with the Option "record in the result.

  Hello

  I have unexpected behavior with the Option "record in the result.

  I have a few steps in the subsequence 'X', this subsequence passes a Boolean parameter. According to the value of the parameter I change the "Recorgind results" Option to report it or not. The thing is that if 'result Recorgind' set at race time I modofy by changing the value of Step.ResultRecordingOption to "Enable" and "Disable", the step is not reported until the same sous-suite 'X' is called for the second time (without changing the parameter passed).

  For example: (Preconditon: result Recorgind Option of all value sous-suite x are defined as Disable)

  1 CallSubsequenceX(Parameter: Enable)

  2 CallSubsequenceX(Parameter: Enable)

  3 CallSubsequenceX(Parameter: Disable)

  4 CallSubsequenceX(Parameter: Disable)

  Expected result:

  1. measures have been reported.

  2. measures have been reported.

  3. measures have not been reported.

  4. measures have not been reported.

  Result:

  1. measures would not same value Step.ResultRecordingOption has been changed to 'enable '. (Not Ok)

  2. measures have been reported. (Ok)

  3. measures reported same value Step.ResultRecordingOption has been changed to 'disable '. (Not Ok)

  4. measures have not been reported. (Ok)

  I use TestStand 2013 (5.1.0.226)

  Thanks in advance.

  -Josymar.

  Hi josymar_guzman,

  I just review the sequence and indeed we´re experience unexpected behavior with the Step.ResultRecordingOption callback. By a reason when you run the callback in the expression before each step section, the statement runs only until the next sequence is called, which is not what we want.

  To avoid this, you can place a statement before each step of the sequence, so you can change the State of the Option "record result" for the sequence running (and it is only the following). You can try something like this

  

  where the expression of the statement will be the recall "RunState.NextStep.ResultRecordingOption is YourCondition". With this, we guarantee that the results of the next step will be saved or not. I also remove the expression in the expression prior to each step section, because the condition is now on the statement before each step.

  I tried and it works fine. I´ll set the sequence that you share with me, with the changes. I hope this will help you and solve your problem.

• Number of the results in the report variable

  Hello everyone,

  I need help in TestStand reports. I use TestStand 2014 and 2014 of Labview, both 32 bits.

  The situation is like this: I am running a test with test steps 3. The first stage of the test is a step of "additional results" which records the device under test info (versions of the hardware software etc...). This information appear in the report and the result data in the database (table prop_result). The next 2 steps are the steps 'real' which measures something.

  In the report, there is a call from the variable "Number of results" (see the screen attached capture) and you see a '3 '. There are actually only 2 steps of 'real' test as I don't want to consider the first step of "additional results" as a test step. How can we affect the variable 'Number of results' so that it does not count this first step? I tried to use the properties-> Run Options-> record result of the for Option set to "Disable". It works and the number of results appeared as "2", but the device under test info do not appear in the report and not in the prop_result of the database table.

  In general, how can I get the number of results of account not a step, but continues to display the result in the database and report? Is there an API where I can access and modify its value (number of results value) such as: "Number of results" - 1?

  Hope someone can point me in the right direction. I have attached the release of the report, as well as the file in the sequence.

  Yours,

  chati

  I ment, you can change the XML seq.--> \Components\Models\TestStandModels\reportgen_xml.seq generator (Ref http://www.ni.com/white-paper/3977/en/).

  It's the AddReportHeader, you need to change. Or more specific step 9 (in teststand 2012) which is a statement-->

  Parameters.ReportHeader += "<" +="" fileglobals.reportelementname="" +="" "="" type='UUT' "="" +="" "="" title='" + ResStr("MODEL", "RPT_HEADER_TITLE") + "' "="" +="" "="" link='" + Locals.UUTItemNameForLink + "' "="" +="" "="" uutresult='" + Str(Locals.Status) + "' "="" +="" "="" stepcount='" + Str(Parameters.StepCount) + "' "="" +="" "="">\r\n".

  and then, you can modify the varabel StepCount using some filtering by using for example a subsequnce that counts only the type of measures that your customer wants to be counted.

  There might be ways esier there, but that's what I'd do.

• Difference between "Toggle Record" and "toggle / / folder.

  There are two commands different keys that can be assigned to the Publisher of key commands.

  • Enable/disable record (.)

  • / / Record toggle (*)

  

  What is the difference between these two?

  Also, what is the best way to access the logic Pro X 'in the manual of the depth?

  I find that the 'logic of aid' within the program is extremely limited or base. I almost find answers advanced in there and if I ago incomplete or very hard to find.

  Essential difference is that Record/toggle allows you to go in and out of recording mode without changing the mode of playback/record...

  Toggle / / folder

  If the playhead is stopped - rocking record will move you in and out of recording mode (without starting the registration process)

  If the read head moves - rocking record will pass you in and out of recording mode (keeping the playhead moving).

  So the foregoing you pop in and out of recording mode independent of the State of the playhead (i.e. order, reading, record)

  Record

  If the playhead is stopped - by pressing the folder will start recording.

  If the playhead is trying to record - pressing the record won't do anything.

• Condition of additional results work does not correctly for the parameters

  TestStand 2014

  Trying to connect a parameter only if the status of the step is "failure" will not save the setting when the step will actually fail.  On the other hand, variables with the same State will record very well.

  The sequence attached illustrates this.  Basically I have a sous-suite that returns a random number and a string as parameters.  I use the random number to evaluate against my limits for the test call.  I want to save the parameter of string only if the step fails.  So I put as an additional result, then assign the condition

  Step.Result.Status == "failed".

  The data never show on the report.

  But when I put a result additional explicit with the same local variable and put the same exact condition it appears on the report when the step fails.

  I'm puzzled as to why settings will not open a session to this condition, but additional explicit results work fine with the same State.

  Any thoughts?

  Thank you

  Condition for additional result of the parameter is evaluated before the State sequence is set to failure. The 'out' parameter additional results are evaluated probably just after the code module, so if the status of the step is not changed by the call of code module, then it will always be "Running".

  I can see how it would be nice if it worked the way you ask, but keep in mind for input/output parameters it is usually the same expression/variable to both the 'in' and 'out' additional result, so it is important to the time at which the result is recorded. It must be done before calling code module for 'in' settings and after the call of code module to 'out' parameters to reflect the State of the variables to these points in time. I think that the intention is that the additional result for settings must reflect the State of the variables at the point in time immediately right before the call for 'in' settings and immediately after the call to 'out' parameters So if you want to connect under certain conditions a value based on the status (where the State is not changed directly by the code module), with the help of a result extra ordinary as you discovered is probably the best way to go.

  Maybe for the parameters we might delay logging to the end, but which may result in a change of behavior if the variable state changes again once before that. If you want us to consider or have another idea for how to handle this better please let us know or maybe post something to the exchange of ideas.

  Another possibility is that we could temporarily connect the results before and after the code module, but then not assess the condition to the end and throw the recorded result if the condition is false. Who can still cause a change in behavior although if "Value of Log" expressions have side effects.

  Hope this helps clarify things.

  -Doug

• How do Parameters.Result used as a reminder? How is it different from Parameters.Step.Result?

  Hello

  I searched reference manuals TestStand, help and the forums, and I have not yet found exactly how Parameters.Result should be used in callbacks (if at all).

  I am trying to find a way to take a step that normally is not registered in the list of results and force it to appear on the rare occasions that it will fail. I think I should use the result, but I don't know how.  If I set Parameters.Step.RecordResult = True, then the step attaches to record results, but which seems to be permanent in the sequence file, and AFTER THAT failure becomes declared.

  Thank you for your expert help!

  -Gizmogal

  By browsing the SequenceFilePostResultListEntry I finally discern the difference between Parameters.Step.Result and Parameters.Result, which is visible at run time:

  Parameters.Result has a TS container, which refers to the stage, giving information such as StepGroup, StepName, StepType, among others. Its results-oriented properties are identical to the Parameters.Step.Result properties, I can say.

  Parameters.Step.Result has a container TS large type TEInf that seems to be the test information administration.

  There seems little back than I expected, but that's it.

  I'm partially through to shift my paradigm - save all the results and then throw those no interest. I ended up adding a status string 'RecordAlways' to force certain steps to record each time, and I throw any which are not equal to or 'Pass', 'Fail', 'Error' or 'done '. It works pretty well so far.

  Thanks again for your help!

  -Gizmogal

• Do not result

  Search Help and reference manual but can't find where to put "Do not not Record result."

  Thank you

  JVH

  Its a box found on the execution Options for the Properties tab page a steps.

  Michael.