Display both internal users and external v5.0

Hello

I have an evironment of configuration using view 5 for internal users using PCOIP (about 500).  I want to enable some of these users access to a virtual computer from outside the workplace.  Currently I only use 1 connection to the server.  I can use this connection to the server to enable PCOIP internal and external / RDP connections or I need to connect 2 servers, one for internal and an external?  I'm just trying to understand how it fits into the picture, I intend on using a security server.  If explained elsewhere then please point me to it, but I tried to search.

Thank you.

Depends on how they access, most of the cases you need an another view connection to the server that is configured for PCoIP tunneling and external URL is what your users will connect from the outside.

Its really easy to install, install another (choose the replica), highlight the original, then you configure the settings above and you're done.

Linjo

Tags: VMware

Similar Questions

  • With both internal customers and external view of the Horizon, I do * have * to have at least a connection to the server by type of connection?

    If I want both external and non - VPN and LAN users internal to access desktops from view, I need to have a connection to the server dedicated to external users and another for internal? Right now I have one pair of Security Server-connection to the server and external connections work fine, but the internal connections are not. I have to get up at least a connection replication server and change the URL HTTPS Secure Tunnel for internal users only?

    Apparently, you don't need a connection to the server dedicated to internal users if you also external users and a security server. I found this during my troubleshooting. The URL of security server will be configured as administrator mode that external URL can be resolved and accessible while the URL to connect to the server will be configured with a URL can be resolved internally and is accessible in administrator mode.

  • Brewing between internal memory and external memory SD card

    The Sansa Clip + shuffle between songs on the internal memory and the external memory SD card; or are they seen as different to play songs stored on the internal and external SD card? I have 4 GB Clip + with a 8 GB external SD card. What total 12 GB? Or should I spend inside out manually to hear the songs loaded on the external SD card?

    dohar9 wrote:

    The Sansa Clip + shuffle between songs on the internal memory and external memory SD card?

    Yes.

    I have 4 GB Clip + with a 8 GB external SD card. What total 12 GB?

    In theory, Yes. In actual practice, but it will be probably closer to 10.75 to 11FR.

    Or should I spend inside out manually to hear the songs loaded on the external SD card?

    N ° the player will play seamlessly two memory slots when you use the random mode.

  • Internal network and external network.

    Hello

    I want to use hyper-V to VMware workstation. I have a problem with that. I have 2 virtual machines, a server and a workstation. The server must be a router to an external network (internet) for the workstation.

    The server will be DNS, DHCP service and transfer to the workstation.

    In Hyper-V, it is easy, the server gets two NICS, one (internet) outside another internal. The workstation only an internal NIC work stations now takes an IP address from the dhcp on the server.

    When I try this with VMware, the workstation does not take into account server and get an address IP of VMware. Is it possible to change this, can VMware act here, as does Hyper-v?

    I thank the of for aid, Pit

    For the internal network, you can use the host only on VMware Workstation's network, and for do not receive not IP address of the DHCP server on VMware Workstation, you can disable the DHCP for the host only to a network using the virtual network Editor, see: VMware KB: using the VMware Workstation virtual network editor

  • Access for interal AND external users through a single login server?

    Hey,.

    Apart from redundancy, it is possible to have a single connection server that allows internal users AND external access virtual resources?

    For external access, I have associated my login server security server. It works perfectly if I activate the PCoIP Secure Gateway option on my server of connection and enter the public IP address of the Security server.

    But with this configuration internal users are not able to connect (listing the works of resources, but the connection fails).

    If I disable the PCoIP Secure Gateway option, internal users can access, but not external users via the Security server.

    Any contribution is appreciated.

    Thank you very much!

    No, it's the only way you can do it for internal users and external to share the same login server - activation of the MTP setting is by CS. If you want to PSG on for external users (and it is practically a necessity unless you use a third-party VPN), but offshore for internal users, they will point to the servers of different connection and so you'll need two.

  • Using issue view file when you use mp3s on the internal memory and the memory microSD external

    (1) if I have folders of mp3 on the player's internal memory and on the external drive microSD memory, can I use the folder to view all folders on the 2 memorys simultaneously integrated on one list or do I have to go through the files on each memory separately.

    (1) if the answer to question 1 is Yes, then I would like to now if I can have on the internal memory and external memory records with the same name, but with different files and the player will display these folders with both files on the internal memory and the external.

    I want to know because I like to browse through the files, and if the internal memory is full, I wish I could add more files in the folders where the internal memory by making a folder with the same name on the micro sd, and I don't like to go through the files on 2 devices at the same time, just on 1 list.

    Help, please.

    Thanks in advance

    The Clip + Treaty internal and external cards in 2 separate sources, under the folder view (it is quite logical, when you think of him, and just as 2 separate cards on your computer).  And if you look at the 2 lists separately (again, just like on your computer).  When you view your files using ID3 tags, both internal and external map content is merged in 1.

    If you do not have to see 2 separate lists, you can simply keep most / all of your content on the map either internal or external (even by, if you were really dead set on it, for example get a 2 GB Clip + and then using 8 or 16 GB external with her new card).

  • The Developer Portal and internal users

    Hello

    I have configured on our ISE to use AD-users as sponsors. And it works perfectly.

    but I also try to set up an internal user to the portal of the sponsor.

    I've configured almost the same so I don't understand why the LSE reports:
    Authentication of the sponsor has failed: not found for the user Sponsorgroup

    My identity store is a sequence of the my and internal users and I can see from the log it looks like the right place:

    Identity store:

    Internal users

    My condition is that the internal user, must be a member of the group identity: sponsorAllAccount

    my home group:

    Group membership:

    SponsorAllAccount

    and then get a group created promoter, this grop of sponsor which is allocated to the State, works very well for det AD-users.

    Evaluate the politics of identity

    5435 sponsor authentication failed

    any suggestions why?    I now use the lastes 1.1.1 version.

    BR

    Tuva

    Yes,

    For your internal groups use the condition of group identity preconfigured on the left.

    I don't know why there is an option on the left, he has not worked for me either in the authorization policies.

    Thank you

    Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App

  • Separate authentication for external and internal users?

    Hello

    Asked me to come with a CEP for a client who wants a new system APEX is accessible to internal and external users. The client security team want to have two separate copies of the request for the APEX and both copies of the auditor of the APEX on separate databases on two separate servers from Weblogic to support different security requirements for both internal and external users. I don't think that is necessary as APEX should be able to impose conditions depending on what type of user is connected, by questioning the cookie passed in which could contain a flag to say whether the user is internally and externally. In addition, CAE can be used to further restrict external access.

    The middleware for the customer solution is managed by a third party, who have made the following recommendations:

    The domestic channel requires SSO to configure on WebLogic while the outside lane. Internal users must be validated on Active Directory, with RSA Authentication Manager used for external users. We cannot set up a listener APEX instance to use and not to use SINGLE sign-on at the same time. Two applications are necessary.

    Now, I understand from my understanding limited the listener of the APEX, it is possible to implement different rules depending on the type of user to access. However, might just as well not be managed from Magnatune APEX? We could write a custom authentication procedure that verifies again road and the SSO user authentication cookie or otherwise, as required.

    So my question is this: can it really be necessary to implement two versions of an APEX application, with two distinct on different servers APEX headphones, to meet the security requirements of separate here? Ultimately at the end of the day if that's what the customer wants, we have to build it, but I'm looking to reassure them via a CEP that won't be necessary. I think that the seller of hardware/middleware recommend that the client just because they do not know available in APEX itself custom authentication options.

    Please forgive any simplifications or the lack of details in the above - I'm more a developer APEX as a person of the infrastructure and a bit of a 'newbie' where the listener APEX is concerned. All advice gratefully appreciated!

    Graham.

    Hi Graham,

    It's a matter of people paranoid how and to what extent they trust their own infrastructure. Things could be easier than to split the environments, but I don't know if I just depends on the cookie because cookie can be easily rigged. But I think that the following architecture would be safe:
    1 internal users connect APEX listener somehow security team requires, come to APEX and maybe be identified using the internal IP address (range). To simulate the INVESTIGATION period should be difficult for external users.
    2. external users connect APEX listener through a defined gateway, preferably a proxy. All future requests through this gateway would be considered external users.
    You may add additional logic to the proxy, for example use something like 'mod_headers' in Apache HTTPD to add a page header to requests, so that you may identify as external users.
    You could, of course, also put it the other Tower and allow internal users to use some proxy to enforce certain rules of IP based address, or perhaps a few additional references as authentication for access to the proxy (which again could be transparent user in AD-configuration, at least if you stick with IE).

    You can easily implement the separation in your custom authentication process. But this architecture also allows some other compromise: even if someone does not trust your application logic to handle two types of application successfully, you can also use the proxy to enforce the specific call for an application id. Certainly you don't need to duplicate the infrastructure...
    Most of the companies already have a proxy for external users, for example to activate SSL and to hide other internal resources, for load balancing,... so I think you just need to put some configuration of the existing infrastructure and end up needing no component additional. Even if there is no proxy and yet, it would be an element of very light weight, easy to handle.

    So far, all this has nothing to do with the earpiece of the APEX. It's 'just' a web front-end for the instance of the APEX in the database. I wouldn't put a logic of network security in this service, but the split things upward front. The APEX listener can be patched to add some logic, but which was not supported.

    I think that this would work and should be sufficient for most of the safety requirements.
    If my picture was not painted understandable, let me know.

    -Udo

  • internal and external memory

    someone knows why I downloaded all my music on an external sd card, but my music shows also in my memory internal when I thought that he wouldn't?

    The Zip is a bit unique, because it is a menu of music and a menu card . By selecting the map menu, you can browse the files stored on the external memory card. However, the menu music will display songs located in the internal memory and on the map as well. It is not a list of songs exclusively to the location of the internal memory.

    Did you see that leads you to believe that the files are copied in both places? As Bob stated, when you browse through the list in the menu music, files that are actually on the card will be a small icon next to them.

    Note also that you can go to the lower part of the menu music to Folders. Here, you can select either the internal memory or external and navigate to check what are the files residing where.

  • Matter of principle: allow internal VPN users to external networks

    Hi people.

    We receive requests from our internal users, asking the ability/permission to VPN in outside networks businesses of related objectives. They would use our business machines sitting on our corporate network and perhaps required VPN software installation/configuration (for example, Nortel, Microsoft PPTP, IPSec Cisco, etc.) They go out through our ASA Firewall and then connect to the remote network.

    Currently, we block out IPSec and PPTP to avoid this problem, and the reason why we give is that you are connecting two networks and potentially open our internal network up to who knows what.

    In the past we have remote offices install stand-alone DSL lines and ACL acceding to the external VPN, but it becomes expensive and bulky. The same for wireless EVDO cards.

    With the current state of the economy, the price of gas or movement, etc., becomes more difficult to refuse these requests and the higher Up inside are getting hit by operational units.

    How guys do you deal with that? What reasons did you give for allowing / preventing external access VPN? The problem is better solved with the policy or technical (or both?) You poke holes and make exceptions for specific external VPNS, and if so, what are the requirements don't surround you?

    Thanks for any input!

    -Neil

    In the case of IPSec, I'm not sure you fill the two networks.

    You allow traffic be sent through tunnel through your good firewall, and the limits imposed on passenger transport are generally determined by the thrust of policy from the other end of the VPN of parties and any software firewall on your host computer.

    I think it boils down to the protection of the appropriate host on your end, and some common sense as to which the parties, you are allowed to connect too (written policy).

    The Cisco VPN Client provides a built-in firewall and the ability to restrict your host to access the local LAN while the tunnel is UP.

  • See 5.1 and external users...

    Hello

    I'm a new 5.1 installation deployment view and came to the point of wanting to grant external users access to their desktop using PCoIP.  I have currently only a single connection to the server in place and don't get any display on external clients unless I have activate the option 'Use PCoIP Secure Gateway for connections PCoIP desktop' and specify the external IP address that I am NAT'ing in the login server.  However, once I do that, it breaks the connectivity for all of my internal users.  Deactivation of the PCoIP Secure Gateway option restores internal connectivity, but then I'm back to square one and only a black screen and disconnected my external when users I'm trying to connect to the desktop computer.

    Roll on a new security server will solve this problem for me?  Or do I need a second connection to my external users server instead?  We have no DMZ area...  Is there any question, place security server (if it's the real solution) on the same local network as my existing connection server segment?

    Thanks for any help!

    -Matt

    Here is the video I made which will answer your questions on the servers VMware View and security for external access: http://www.virtualdojo.com/content/how-configure-security-server-security-servers-101

  • Mix records with the same name of the internal and external space (clip +)

    Hello

    I have a question regarding the reading of 'File': if having a folder on the inside and external space microsd, both are named "graphics". Is it possible to shuffel these 2 files with the same name? There are also a few other folders I want to be included, so I just couldn't use the "play all" option. I don't want to use replay by id3tag because mines are always screwed up and would be a lot of work to mark all the appropriate files in the.

    Thanks for help

    m.

    I've not played with playlists much.

    If ID3 tags are all screwed up, I would use the MP3tag utility to change the label of the kind in "Charts" on internal and external memory, then you access the kind-> just Charts and play at all.  It is probably not an option if your labels are blank and you don't want to ruin you, but it's really quick & easy to do with MP3tag.

    I think that even Windows Explorer (XP/Vista) can change the field type in the batch (select all 'charts' music files, click right properties, summary (Advanced) tab change the field of its kind in "Charts", OK).  I keep the ID3tags 'good' on my PC, but edit on my player according to the needs.

    Just another idea which is really easy if you're not afraid of screwing the ID3 tags.

  • Map of the C:/Users and undermaps is hidden in Vista and Windows 7 - How to display this map and find the main card for all the Point of junction of the operating system

    Hello
    I have a problem or two, three and so of...

    I'm using a Vista and a Windows 7 computer and both systems hide many different cards when it is installed to even the fact that I have are the only user with administrative privileges on both computers.
    And I have to search all over the place for a few guides that can tell me how to:
    (1) show all cards like c:/Users/name/*.*
    (2) find the mainfolders diffirent behind all the diffirent Junction Points
    The two all I can get is someone who tells me to go and Explore/Optins/show/mark ' display all the hidden files and folders and clear Hide protected OSfiles hide known file types names. "
    (A Danish BONES that I use for my translations may not be accurate)

    That the two Don t unhide/Show map C:/Users and folders/files under this mainmap at all.

    So, is there someone who can tell me how I get fuld kontrol and get all the cards and visible files on my private property paid og computers without telling me to try this ot try it?

    (1) I'm sorry, but I don't know what you mean by "cards".

    (2) to see the junction points in the files they point to and C:\Users\Name, open a command prompt window and type:

    dir random Boulder computer Maven
    Most Microsoft Valuable Professional

  • MAB with ACS (internal store) and 802. 1 X with Active Directory (external store)

    Hello

    at the moment we´re using ACS MAB. Every Mac are stored as internal hosts on GBA. I want to migrate to 802. 1 X.

    Users have AD. During the migration, I need MAB and 802. 1. X is it possible to use the database internally and externally at the same time to the

    same access strategy?

    Concerning

    Horst

    Hello Horst-

    Yes, you can do this by creating an "identity" store sequence and fix the two AD and the data store is internal to it. Take a look at the link below:

    https://supportforums.Cisco.com/document/103901/ACS-5x-identity-store-sequence

    Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

  • Potential new user - several work stations and external hard drive

    Hello

    I am considering the purchase of Lightroom, but wanted to run my script by the group to see if it works for me.

    I have a desktop at home and at work, in addition to a laptop that I use when the place. The laptop is only used to unload the memory cards and do organize basic, not image processing.

    At home, I have a database of image (XnView) that I use to organize my files, and then go to the bridge to convert my RAW TIF files. When I did work on my images, I use Beyond Compare to synchronize my internal image with an external drive. Outside we're going with me both as a backup, but that allows me to do more editing on my schedule for dinner. Any changes to the work is then synchronized to the internal drive to the House.

    At home, the internal drive is designated as H (I use Windows) while the outside is the G drive. At work, when I plug the external hard drive, I put to come as the H drive. In this way, the files of database for XnView, residing on both internal and external, discs are loaded and XnView is none the wiser. OK, so that was a long introduction to my questions...

    First of all, if I use Lightroom, can I use it on multiple computers as long as I use it never simultaneously on more than one?

    Second, if I save the catalog on the internal H drive home, and then synchronize on the external drive, Lightroom to work just start and play these files of database unconscious because it is now an external hard drive?

    Third, Lightroom has a built-in synchronization feature to do this, or I would continue using Beyond Compare to synchronize the two disks until I run Lightroom?

    Thank you!

    Mark

    www.NorthernLight.net

    www.Pinnacle-VR.com

    www.Virtual-Travels.com

    Just to add. I use LR on two machines (sometimes three), there is no problem with the license, there is no activation and LR is designed for the Pro who obviously needs to be mobile. The images in the catalogue are on an external drive. These are also saved on my studio machine. The catalogue is also on the disk external and also duplicated on both computers. and saved on separate hard drives.

    I work from the catalog on disk external when working on the top of the Tower in the studio, or as appropriate on machines borrowed in the field. Some would say that a catalog runs slower on an external drive. While the construction of previews, recording of the xmp data (or in my case direct to DNG) and import are a little slower with the help of an external drive, there is not slowing the work of real treatment.

    It means that I have a general catalogue of all my images which is always up to date. It works very well without any problems.

Maybe you are looking for

  • macOS Sierra and FCPX

    I know that the rule is to never update a FCPX in the middle of a project. But, it would be prudent to upgrade the to macOS Sierra in the middle of a project? I have a project that will live for a spell while a picky customer establishes many revi. (

  • Portege M100 - need driver ethernet

    Hello! I need driver for my laptop ethernet. It's the Portege M100.I have download all the drivers from the drivers download, but still ethernet does not work. Thank you!!!

  • Keys on my keyboard don't work

    Some of the keys on my laptop don't work. I did the apple hardware test and could not find anything wrong with it. I have followed the http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1381page and there was no change. I removed some of the keys and cleaned, still no ch

  • PhotoSmart 7520 does not connect to "Web Services"

    My new PhotoSmart 7520 eAll-in-one printer will not connect to the "web services" today. Yesterday all top and work without any problem. Any app I try, it gives me the same error message. I run Win XP, the computer is connected to a wireless router w

  • HP Mini 1000: fatal error... System stopped. CNU9223899

    Comes on, then goes to a screen of password, I have no idea how it happened. Please help me