Do NowPlayingConnection high priority?

It is anyway I can make my purchase of apps theNowPlayingConnection a high priority connection, it is by default a connection of low priority and I see no way to put it?

http://developer.BlackBerry.com/native/documentation/Cascades/graphics_multimedia/audio_video/access...

I have it. Not render service.

Tags: BlackBerry Developers

Similar Questions

  • No update high priority - post of XP SP3

    Fees no installation of XP SP2 OEM CDs no problem.

    Install XP SP3 Redistributable (used many times before) no problem.

    After restarting Windows Update, install the Active X control and it came up saying there is no high priority updates.

    Tried same question to Microsoft Update.

    Upgrade to IE 8 to 6 and still the same issue.

    I know from experience that there are more post SP3 updates.

    Anyone have any ideas?

    Thank you

    Rob...

    Time constraints forced to re - install again and everything worked as expected.

  • I get Error 0x80072EFD in striking express, to get high-priority updates. What can I do to fix this?

    When I type express for high priority updates, I get Error 0x80072EFD. How can I fix it. ??

    Hello

    If you got the error number: 0x80072efd? It is also known under the name Windows update code 80072efd or 0x80072efd error. It is a windows error message quite rare that some Windows users face. More often than otherwise, the problem occurs when someone tries to use the Microsoft Windows update Web to install or check the latest updates. Although the 0x80072efd error can be a bit complicated, fixing is easy if you take the right actions.

    This error is due to problems of communication between the computer and the Windows Server. Some interruptions occur in the Windows registry and it disrupts the flow of information from your computer to Windows. This can be caused a number of things such as:

    Errors of registry data, and Windows o.

    o malicious or redundant processes that block the communication.

    o temporary files or other unnecessary memory that clutters the ability of the computer to access the information.

    What the error number: 0x80072efd tells you is that you do not have a fully optimized computer. There are probably a ton of registry errors from of unnecessary and malicious files and programs that should be removed immediately. Not only are these problems bother you with these error messages, they also slow down your computer.

    Fortunately, there is software available that can correct the 0x80072efd error messages. What it does, it's completely optimize your computer. It will be not only difficulty the registry errors, but also remove unnecessary information and processes that will speed up the performance of the computer. Try it for yourself and scan your computer below for free

    Find the support options for the article:

    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/836941

    http://www.tech-archive.NET/archive/Windows/Microsoft.public.windowsupdate/2005-10/msg00655.html

  • Office Live Add-in 1.5 doesn't have x 524 - high priority - 0 Installation error code

    I have Windows XP, SP3, the publishing house, 2002. It is set for automatic updates. Today (18/04/12) I tried to install a high priority, Office Live Add-in 1.5 update. But there is no setup, error Code 0 x 524.  I tried to download the software "Fix - It". The update is not yet installed.

    Why can't I install the update? What is a disadvantage if I don't install it? I always install high priority updates. Is there a security problem? I have Windows Live Messenger, but I do not use it.

    Thank you

    Try this link and the game he's going to...
    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/2572738

    Run the fix - it and I'm sure you can solve it easily...

    To know more about Office Live Add in:- http://www.google.com/#hl=en&safe=active&sclient=psy-ab&q=what+is+Office+Live+Add-in+1.5+&oq=what+is+Office+Live+Add-in+1.5+&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_nf=1&gs_l=hp.3...138270.139097.1.139861.8.7.0.0.0.1.640.640.5-1.1.0.bnUatMM34kE&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=f3793bcf9ecffb4a&biw=1519&bih=695

  • It cannot install the update of high priority KB2572067. Get messages saying can't install updated

    It cannot install high priority updae KB2572067. Get the message saying updates cannot be installed. I could use some help with this problem.

    Hello

    Let us know the Setup error code:

    (a) click Start, click all programs, and then click Windows Update or Microsoft Update.

    (b) on the Windows Update Web site or the Microsoft Update Web site, click on view update history. A window opens that displays the updates that have been installed or that have failed to install on the computer.

    (c) in the status column of this window, find the update failed to install, and then click the red X.

    (d) a new window opens that displays the installation error code.

    Method 1: Boot your system in clean boot mode, and then run Windows updates.

    Try now to the KB article to perform the clean boot:
    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/310353

    Important: After you use the clean boot in order to solve your problem follow the steps in the "steps to configure Windows to use a Normal startup state" section to start your system in normal mode.

    Method 2: Disable the security software installed on your system and then try to run Windows updates.
    Important: Please remember to turn it on once you install updates.

    Method 3: Keep the computer in clean boot mode and disabled security software, please download the update manually from the link provided below and install it.
    Note: Please do not forget to start the system in normal mode and activate the security software, after you install the update manually.

    http://www.Microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?ID=27715

    Method 4: Try the steps in the article mentioned below to repair the .net Framework in your system:
    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/923100

  • Update high priority for Windows XP several times offered

    original title: update of high priority for Windows XP (file with 0 KB)

    I have a family high priority for Microsoft Windows XP Edition update. Every time I install the file everything works OK and shows, it was installed after that I get the same update each time and each time I install it I keep going around and with the same file.

    The file is KB2539631:
    Security Update for Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2 on Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP x 86 (KB2539631).

    I found that MS file size is 0 KB as in the line below so how can I install a file size '0 '?

    Download size: 0 KB 0 minutes (downloaded; ready to install)

    A security issue has been identified that could allow a malicious user to compromise your Windows system that is running the Microsoft .NET Framework and gain access to information. You can protect your computer by installing this update from Microsoft. After you install this item, you may have to restart your computer.

    Can anyone help re this file and what I can do?

    Thank you

    Steve

    Open Add/Remove programs and make sure that the show updates at the top box is checked. Now scroll down & tell me if KB2478658 is listed? [1]

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    See the section "How to get help" of http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2539631

    Visit the Microsoft Solution Center and antivirus security for resources and tools to keep your PC safe and healthy. If you have problems with the installation of the update itself, visit the Microsoft Update Support for resources and tools to keep your PC updated with the latest updates.

    For enterprise customers, support for security updates is available through your usual support contacts.

    =======================================================
    [1] KB2539631 overrides (replaces) KB2478658 (June 14-11).

  • Give a higher priority than the wireless LAN / off wireless if LAN is connected

    Hello.

    What I want to do is quite simple: Im my office there is a fast LAN connection and a pretty poor wireless connection. Therefore, I want to say my device: "If there is a network cable is connected, simply use LAN." In this case, do not use Wifi. If there is no LAN cable connected, try to connect to Wifi. »

    It's really annoying to change this manually each time.

    I have already changed the priority of network connection in Windows 7 as described here: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2526067

    But in vain.

    My laptop is E531.

    WIFI device: Intel Centrino Wireless-N 2230
    Date of the driver 30.09.2012
    15.3.1.2 driver version

    Hi cis.

    did you by chance of access installed on your system?  It is possible that the wireless network adapter is set to a higher priority than LAN in your location profile which is the cause of the behavior.  If you have not installed AC it can be a possible solution, you can try.

    Link to another thread on this topic;

    http://forums.Lenovo.com/T5/ThinkVantage-Technologies/access-connections-disable-WiFi-on-wired-conne...

  • Volume control causes trouble high priority thread

    A few weeks ago, when I was finishing my "Flix" app and adjust the priorities of the threads, I noticed that the wire audio high priority interfered with the volume buttons of the PlayBook. Specifically, it could support you on a volume button and nothing would happen, at least not for a second or two. It was as if the priority of the audio thread was so high that it prevented the OS to respond to the pressure on the hardware button to the user.

    This week, the behavior is quite different: the volume controls work fine, but as soon as you press on one of them, the audio wire starts to fight, and the audio gets all the "poppy/static ' y '.

    The really strange thing is that even though the notification of change of volume disappears from the screen, the sound remains ' poppy/static ' y ', as if the volume permanently change event interferes with the audio wire.

    I was wondering if the OS was lowering the priority of the thread on an event of volume change, but I think I have excluded that... when I ask the audio thread for its priority, remains at 63 before and after the events of volume change.

    So it is obviously very confusing... How the hell a single volume change event could interfere with the audio thread of the application until the end of the execution of the application? (Even if the application gets a "break" due to need extra buffer audio and video, as soon as the audio continues, it is always static'y)

    The other thing that may or may not be related, it's that last week my PlayBook prompted me that there is an update of the OS.  The strange thing is that the version of the update seems to be exactly the same as the version of the operating system I had, and it was only 3 MB. I can't help but wonder if this is somehow related to the change of behavior that I see.

    Any help would be most appreciated.

    Thank you!

    Daniel

    I finally understood how to prevent the volume control to cause audio problems.

    Here's the long answer:

    -My app plays WAV files back to back. There was a slight "couture" in the audio that I tried to get rid of.

    -A point I tried removed calls to snd_pcm_open and snd_mixer_open whenever a WAV file has been played, thinking that maybe something to do with the small gap in the audio.

    -I didn't know at the time, but I think it's when editing of the volume begun resulting in distortions on the audio.

    -Distortions are prevented by listening to events of volume change, and when it is received, ensure what I call snd_pcm_open and snd_mixer_open to the next WAV file playback.

  • Problem with Spotlight fields with the higher priority than browserfield

    It comes to JRE6.

    Some Web sites make a redirect of content or another ajax request when the document is loaded.  When the screen contains a browserfield and a focusable field with a higher priority, an illegal state Exception is thrown by the browser because it is not to the point when the content refreshes the field.  (As in defining BrowserField.setFocus () before calling BrowserField.refresh ()).

    Example: http://supportforums.blackberry.com/t5/Java-Development/BrowserField-Sample-Code-Create-your-first-B...

    Using the code of the BrowserField2 example, simply by adding a ButtonField in the survey except title when navigating to twitter.com.  Other sites work fine, but when the content/javascript is in a certain way on Twitter, she seems to have some problems.

    package mypackage;
    
    import net.rim.device.api.ui.component.ButtonField;
    import net.rim.device.api.ui.container.*;
    import net.rim.device.api.browser.field2.*;
    import net.rim.device.api.ui.*;
    
    class MyBrowserField2Sample extends UiApplication
    {
        private MainScreen _screen;
        private BrowserField _bf2;
        private ButtonField btnField;
    
        MyBrowserField2Sample()
        {   
    
            btnField = new ButtonField();
            btnField.setLabel("A BUTTON");
    
            _bf2 = new BrowserField();
    
            _screen = new MainScreen();
            _screen.setTitle(btnField);
            _screen.add(_bf2);
            pushScreen(_screen);
    
            _bf2.requestContent("http://www.twitter.com");
        }
    
        public static void main(String[] args)
        {
            MyBrowserField2Sample app = new MyBrowserField2Sample();
            app.enterEventDispatcher();
        }
    }
    

    The code above throws an illegal state exception at startup.  If you delete the setTitle (or any field focusable) that has a higher priority than the browserfield, so it works well.

    How can I force the focus on the browserfield when she needs?

    I Googled, found issues similar and all say "force focus on the browserfield", but even if you force the focus, the same illegal state occurs due to the updating of the content.

    Thanks in advance,

    Nate

    After reviewing the matter further, the problem may be to the field focusable, but it doesn't have to be on top.  Basically, any field focusable on the same screen as the browserfield throws the exception.

    While going to twitter.com in blackberry browser works very well (sends you to the mobile site), this behavior causes problems with the browserfield.

    The workaround, is just to force the link to open the mobile site directly.

  • HA 5.0 - what happens if not all the VMs of high priority start?

    If you are using vSphere 5.0 with the new HA and I have selected for example 10 virtual machines with a high priority and the rest with a way by default, then after failing the medium priority VMs should not start until all the high VMs have been restarted.

    However, if for any reason a priority high THAT VM does not start - what will happen with the environment? They will wait forever or is there any time-out value that will allow them to get actually?

    Also, if all the high VMs restart successfully, when are usually begun average VMs? Is there any time or similar value that governs this?

    Prior to 5.0, HA will re-start all virtual machines more or less at the same time. The priority of restarting been really used only to decide _which_ vms to failover if there are not enough resources to restart all the. In 5.0, HA will restart all virtual machines of high priority before starting to restart more low priority vms. This ranking is only with respect to the operation 'turned on. As soon as all virtual machines of high priority are turned on, HA will increase to restart the Middle, then the vms of priority below. High-priority virtual machines can still be booting virtual machines of medium priority starting power. Once HA has restarted VMS high priority it passes immediately to lowest priority those - it does not wait for 30 seconds. And as already mentioned, this ranking is only for initial failover attempt. If some high priority vm fails to failover for a reason, HA will not until failover of VMS of lower priority if the retry of the high-priority virtual computer restarts may occur during or after the lower priority vms are be toggled.

    Elisha

  • Make in as3 = high priority tasks Manager?

    Make in as3 = high priority tasks Manager?

    I discovered that when I was playing my game on the flashplayer.exe. I went to the Manager task 'set priority' to keen on the flashplayer and BOOM everything works and it was block on 30 fps each image.

    Now is anyway that I can do this in as3?

    I use Flash Cs5.5

    No, and you should never want to. If your application gets out of control, it will take down the system. Most of the process with much lower priority and if your application makes it unable to operate, it's a guaranteed system lock.

    What you need to do, is find ways to optimize your game to stay within the limits of the system average people.

    AS3 has no access to the operating system unless you use a projector and an extender like MDM Zinc mProjector or scenes or similar. Even in this case, you need to hang a DLL which has access to processes that can increase your own process priority. It is simply not recommended in all chances are that your application will run silky on my system, but your system is just a little more dated.

    First, please try to find ways to optimize the game.

  • Is there a way to mark an e-mail as high priority when you compose a message in the application Mail in Windows 8?

    You used to be able to do that in Windows Live Mail, and you can always do it in the new web Outlook e-mail interface.

    I can't find in the application Mail in Windows 8.
    Also, when asked on twitter, @WindowsSupport actually has responded saying, they "couldn't fins of the info on it. Let us know if you find an answer"on the support forums.
    Perhaps, it can be added on a coming soon future update?

    Yes, it can be done now.

    After you click new (+) to create a new message, click show more to the left (under the Cc box). You should now see a menu drop-down labeled priority appear below the BCC box that you can use to select high/normal/low priority.

  • Need a logic - high priority

    Hi experts,

    To develop XML I have need to develop the DATA MODEL (sql query) in the HRMS module.

    The condition is that, for the particular CATEGORY of employees and in a specific RANGE of experience
    Need the number NUMBER OF the FUNCTION in the particular RANGE both in the particular CATEGORY.

    Total experience
    S. n.     Grades 0-3, 3-6, 6 - 9 9-12, 12-15, 15-18 > 18
    1     A 2     0     5 ......
    2     B     1     0     7 .......
    3     C     4     2     1 .....
    4     D     1     5     0 ......

    Grade A and range 0-3 years of experience, we find the total no.. employees.

    This is the layout that I have to develop I know it can reach through the XML EDITOR.

    But I need a logic of how develop the SQL query.

    A code example is please share consider the priority - HIGH

    Thank you
    Vasile

    This gives the basic structure. Simply to enhance performance and make changes to make it more accurate.

    SELECT pg.name
    , (SELECT count (1))
    OF per_periods_of_service OPP
    per_all_assignments_f ADP
    WHERE trunc (MONTHS_BETWEEN (NVL(ppos.actual_termination_date,sysdate), ppos.date_start) / 12)) BETWEEN 0 AND 3
    AND paaf.period_of_service_id = ppos.period_of_service_id
    AND trunc (sysdate) BETWEEN paaf.effective_start_date AND paaf.effective_end_date
    AND paaf.grade_id is PG. grade_id) '0-3 '.
    , (SELECT count (1))
    OF per_periods_of_service OPP
    per_all_assignments_f ADP
    WHEN trunc (MONTHS_BETWEEN (NVL(ppos.actual_termination_date,sysdate), ppos.date_start) / 12) BETWEEN 4 AND 6
    AND paaf.period_of_service_id = ppos.period_of_service_id
    AND trunc (sysdate) BETWEEN paaf.effective_start_date AND paaf.effective_end_date
    AND paaf.grade_id is PG. grade_id) "4 to 6.
    OF per_grades pg

    Kind regards
    Santhosh Jose

  • Computer Windows XP detects not * all * critical updates or high priority

    Hello

    I am and have been, problems with a computer Windows XP here at work that does not detect critical updates either Windows Update or Microsoft Update.  In fact, the only update that is currently available to me is one for Silverlight.  I also checked that no update is currently hidden.  In addition, when checking "Add/Remove Programs" when you select the check box 'Show updates', that an update installed is listed: Security Update for Windows XP (KB923786).

    I should also mention that I don't get any errors whatsoever in the analysis of updates; simply, the updates are not listed as being available for me to install.  It's almost as if he thinks that I have already installed.

    This computer running Windows XP SP3 and Internet Explorer 6 installed (Internet Explorer 7 or 8 is not an update available) I have not tried to install IE7 manually although I can try soon (if you think it can solve my problem).

    Here's what I've tried:
    I tried to reinstall the Windows Update Agent using the command: windowsupdateagent30 - x 86 .exe /wuforce
    I tried to reset the Windows Update components using the tool 'Fix It' of this article (I did not all the steps manually): http://support.microsoft.com/kb/971058

    This is the last release of my file WindowsUpdate.log last time I tried to search for updates:

    2010-01-27 10:45:34:484 468 a6c Misc = logging initialized (build: 7.4.7600.226, tz:-0800) =.
    2010-01-27 10:45:34:484 468 a6c Misc = process: C:\Program may Explorer\iexplore.exe
    2010-01-27 10:45:34:484 468 a6c Misc = Module: C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuapi.dll
    2010-01-27 10:45:34:484 468 a6c COMAPI - COMAPI: IUpdateServiceManager::AddService -.
    2010-01-27 10:45:34:484 468 a6c COMAPI - ServiceId = {7971f918-a847-4430-9279-4a52d1efe18d}
    2010-01-27 10:45:34:484 468 a6c COMAPI - AuthorizationCabPath = C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\AuthCabs\muauth.cab
    2010-01-27 10:45:34:500 1080 61 c Misc validation signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\AuthCabs\Downloaded\7971f918-a847-4430-9279-4a52d1efe18d.auth.cab.temp\muauth.cab:
    2010-01-27 10:45:34:500 1080 61 ch. Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
    The service properties of DtaStor update 2010-01-27 10:45:34:500 2160 874: registered with AU service is {7971F918-A847-4430-9279-4A52D1EFE18D}
    2010-01-27 10:45:34:500 468 a6c COMAPI - added service, URL = http://update.microsoft.com/microsoftupdate/
    2010-01-27 10:45:34:500 468 a6c COMAPI - COMAPI: IUpdateServiceManager::RegisterServiceWithAU -.
    2010-01-27 10:45:34:500 468 a6c COMAPI - ServiceId = {7971f918-a847-4430-9279-4a52d1efe18d}
    2010-01-27 10:45:34:515 468 a6c Misc = logging initialized (build: 7.4.7600.226, tz:-0800) =.
    2010-01-27 10:45:34:515 468 a6c Misc = process: C:\Program may Explorer\iexplore.exe
    2010-01-27 10:45:34:515 468 a6c Misc = Module: C:\WINDOWS\system32\muweb.dll
    2010-01-27 10:45:34:515 468 a6c Misc validation signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\WuRedir\9482F4B4-E343-43B6-B170-9A65BC822C77\muv4wuredir.cab:
    2010-01-27 10:45:34:546 468 a6c Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
    2010-01-27 10:45:34:750 468 a6c Misc validation signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\WuRedir\9482F4B4-E343-43B6-B170-9A65BC822C77\muv4wuredir.cab:
    2010-01-27 10:45:34:765 468 a6c Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
    2010-01-27 10:45:34:765 468 a6c Misc validation signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\WebSetup\wuident.cab:
    2010-01-27 10:45:34:765 468 a6c Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
    2010-01-27 10:45:34:859 468 a6c Misc validation signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\WebSetup\wuident.cab:
    2010-01-27 10:45:34:859 468 a6c Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:265 468 a6c Misc validation signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\WebSetup\wsus3setup.cab:
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:265 468 a6c Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:265 468 a6c Setup * configuration: check if it is necessary to update *.
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:265 468 a6c Setup * Inf file: C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\WebSetup\wsus3setup.inf
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:265 468 a6c installation NOT required for the C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuweb.dll update: target = 7.4.7600.226, required version 7.4.7600.226 = version
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:265 468 a6c Setup * IsUpdateRequired = No
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:265 468 a6c Misc = logging initialized (build: 7.4.7600.226, tz:-0800) =.
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:265 468 a6c Misc = process: C:\Program may Explorer\iexplore.exe
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:265 468 a6c Misc = Module: C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuweb.dll
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:265 468 a6c Misc validation signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\WuRedir\9482F4B4-E343-43B6-B170-9A65BC822C77\muv4wuredir.cab:
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:281 468 a6c Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:359 468 a6c Misc validation signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\WuRedir\9482F4B4-E343-43B6-B170-9A65BC822C77\muv4wuredir.cab:
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:359 468 a6c Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:359 468 a6c Misc validation signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\WebSetup\wuident.cab:
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:359 468 a6c Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:453 468 a6c Misc validation signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\WebSetup\wuident.cab:
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:453 468 a6c Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:453 468 a6c Misc validation signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\WebSetup\wsus3setup.cab:
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:453 468 a6c Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:609 468 a6c Misc validation signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\WebSetup\wsus3setup.cab:
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:625 468 a6c Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:625 468 a6c Setup * configuration: check if it is necessary to update *.
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:625 468 a6c Setup * Inf file: C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\WebSetup\wsus3setup.inf
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:625 468 a6c installation NOT required for the C:\WINDOWS\system32\cdm.dll update: target = 7.4.7600.226, required version 7.4.7600.226 = version
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:625 468 a6c installation NOT required for the C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuapi.dll update: target = 7.4.7600.226, required version 7.4.7600.226 = version
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:625 468 a6c installation NOT required for the C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuapi.dll.mui update: target = 7.4.7600.226, required version 7.4.7600.226 = version
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:625 468 a6c installation NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuauclt.exe update: target = 7.4.7600.226, required version 7.4.7600.226 = version
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:625 468 a6c installation NOT required for the C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuaucpl.cpl update: target = 7.4.7600.226, required version 7.4.7600.226 = version
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:625 468 a6c installation NOT required for the C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuaucpl.cpl.mui update: target = 7.4.7600.226, required version 7.4.7600.226 = version
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:625 468 a6c installation NOT required for the C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuaueng.dll update: target = 7.4.7600.226, required version 7.4.7600.226 = version
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:625 468 a6c installation NOT required for the C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuaueng.dll.mui update: target = 7.4.7600.226, required version 7.4.7600.226 = version
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:625 468 a6c installation NOT required for the C:\WINDOWS\system32\wucltui.dll update: target = 7.4.7600.226, required version 7.4.7600.226 = version
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:625 468 a6c installation NOT required for the C:\WINDOWS\system32\wucltui.dll.mui update: target = 7.4.7600.226, required version 7.4.7600.226 = version
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:625 468 a6c installation NOT required for the C:\WINDOWS\system32\wups.dll update: target = 7.4.7600.226, required version 7.4.7600.226 = version
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:625 468 a6c installation NOT required for the C:\WINDOWS\system32\wups2.dll update: target = 7.4.7600.226, required version 7.4.7600.226 = version
    2010-01-27 10:45:35:625 468 a6c Setup * IsUpdateRequired = No
    2010-01-27 10:45:37:765 468 a6c COMAPI-
    2010-01-27 10:45:37:765 468 a6c COMAPI - START - COMAPI: search [ClientId = MicrosoftUpdate]
    2010-01-27 10:45:37:765 468 a6c COMAPI-
    2010-01-27 10:45:37:765 1080 63C Agent *.
    2010-01-27 10:45:37:765 468 a6c COMAPI<-- submitted="" --="" comapi:="" search="" [clientid="">
    2010-01-27 10:45:37:781 1080 63C Agent * START * Agent: finding updates [CallerId = MicrosoftUpdate] of
    2010-01-27 10:45:37:781 1080 63C Agent *.
    2010-01-27 10:45:37:781 1080 63C Agent * Online = Yes; Ignore download priority = No
    2010-01-27 10:45:37:781 1080 63C Agent * criteria = "IsInstalled = 0 and IsHidden = 0".
    2010-01-27 10:45:37:781 1080 63C Agent * ServiceID = {7971F918-A847-4430-9279-4A52D1EFE18D} third service
    2010-01-27 10:45:37:781 1080 63C Agent * scope of search = {Machine}
    2010-01-27 10:45:37:781 1080 63C Misc validation signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\WuRedir\9482F4B4-E343-43B6-B170-9A65BC822C77\muv4wuredir.cab:
    2010-01-27 10:45:37:781 1080 63 c. Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
    2010-01-27 10:45:37:875 1080 63C Misc validation signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\WuRedir\9482F4B4-E343-43B6-B170-9A65BC822C77\muv4wuredir.cab:
    2010-01-27 10:45:37:875 1080 63 c. Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
    2010-01-27 10:45:37:875 1080 63C Agent looking for updates auth cab for 7971f918-a847-4430-9279-4a52d1efe18d to http://download.windowsupdate.com/v9/microsoftupdate/redir/muauth.cab service
    2010-01-27 10:45:37:875 1080 63C Misc validation signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\AuthCabs\authcab.cab:
    2010-01-27 10:45:37:875 1080 63 c. Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
    2010-01-27 10:45:38:031 1080 63C Misc validation signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\AuthCabs\authcab.cab:
    2010-01-27 10:45:38:031 1080 63 c. Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
    2010-01-27 10:45:38:031 1080 63C Misc validation signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\AuthCabs\authcab.cab:
    2010-01-27 10:45:38:031 1080 63 c. Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
    The service properties of DtaStor update 2010-01-27 10:45:38:031 2160 874: registered with AU service is {7971F918-A847-4430-9279-4A52D1EFE18D}
    2010-01-27 10:45:38:156 1080 63C Misc validation signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\WuRedir\7971F918-A847-4430-9279-4A52D1EFE18D\muv4muredir.cab:
    2010-01-27 10:45:38:171 1080 63 c. Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
    2010-01-27 10:45:38:203 1080 63C Misc validation signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\WuRedir\7971F918-A847-4430-9279-4A52D1EFE18D\muv4muredir.cab:
    2010-01-27 10:45:38:218 1080 63 c. Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
    2010-01-27 10:45:38:218 1080 63 c PT +++ PT: Synchronizing server updates +++
    2010-01-27 10:45:38:218 1080 63 c PT + ServiceId = {7971F918-A847-4430-9279-4A52D1EFE18D}, URL of the server = https://www.update.microsoft.com/v6/ClientWebService/client.asmx
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:296 1080 63C Misc validation signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\WuRedir\7971F918-A847-4430-9279-4A52D1EFE18D\muv4muredir.cab:
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:296 1080 63 c. Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:343 1080 63C Misc validation signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\WuRedir\7971F918-A847-4430-9279-4A52D1EFE18D\muv4muredir.cab:
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:343 1080 63 c. Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:359 1080 63 c PT +++ PT: synchronizing extended update info +++
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:359 1080 63 c PT + ServiceId = {7971F918-A847-4430-9279-4A52D1EFE18D}, URL of the server = https://www.update.microsoft.com/v6/ClientWebService/client.asmx
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:781 1080 63C Agent update {B22FF8ED-582A-4380-9C6D-79FA20B29609}.101 is cut out because of the possible replacement
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:781 1080 63C Agent update {87C66D63-B877-4A92-9DE9-FEF73A4BA530}.100 is cut out because of the possible replacement
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:781 1080 63C Agent update {870866B2-C082-4DF6-8E15-B2E44D033FEB}.100 is cut out because of the possible replacement
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:781 1080 63C Agent * updated added {BA218E08-07BB-4AD8-B5F4-3BE7831CA617}.100 to search result
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:781 1080 63C Agent * updates found 1 and 54 categories in the search. evaluated Appl. rules of 530 of the 653 deployment of entities
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:781 1080 63C Agent *.
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:781 1080 63C Agent * END * Agent: finding updates [CallerId = MicrosoftUpdate] of
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:781 1080 63C Agent *.
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:796 468 d90 COMAPI > COMAPI - RECOVERY -: search [ClientId = MicrosoftUpdate]
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:796 468 d90 COMAPI - updates found = 1
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:796 468 d90 COMAPI-
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:796 468 d90 COMAPI - END--COMAPI: search [ClientId = MicrosoftUpdate]
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:796 468 d90 COMAPI-
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:796 468 a6c COMAPI-
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:796 468 a6c COMAPI - START - COMAPI: search [ClientId = MicrosoftUpdate]
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:796 468 a6c COMAPI-
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:812 468 a6c COMAPI<-- submitted="" --="" comapi:="" search="" [clientid="">
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:812 1080 63C Agent *.
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:812 1080 63C Agent * START * Agent: finding updates [CallerId = MicrosoftUpdate] of
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:812 1080 63C Agent *.
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:812 1080 63C Agent * Online = No; Ignore download priority = No
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:812 1080 63C Agent * criteria = "IsInstalled = 0 and IsHidden = 1".
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:812 1080 63C Agent * ServiceID = {7971F918-A847-4430-9279-4A52D1EFE18D} third service
    2010-01-27 10:45:40:812 1080 63C Agent * scope of search = {Machine}
    2010-01-27 10:45:41:171 1080 63C Agent * found 0 updates day and 54 categories in the search. rules apply evaluated 147 of deployed 653 entities
    2010-01-27 10:45:41:171 1080 63C Agent *.
    2010-01-27 10:45:41:171 1080 63C Agent * END * Agent: finding updates [CallerId = MicrosoftUpdate] of
    2010-01-27 10:45:41:171 1080 63C Agent *.
    2010-01-27 10:45:41:187 468 d90 COMAPI > COMAPI - RECOVERY -: search [ClientId = MicrosoftUpdate]
    2010-01-27 10:45:41:187 468 d90 COMAPI - updates found = 0
    2010-01-27 10:45:41:187 468 d90 COMAPI-
    2010-01-27 10:45:41:187 468 d90 COMAPI - END--COMAPI: search [ClientId = MicrosoftUpdate]
    2010-01-27 10:45:41:187 468 d90 COMAPI-
    2010-01-27 10:45:45:781 1080 63C report REPORT EVENT: {C5218E70-D22F-4009-82CC-226A9D6D8440} 2010-01-27 10:45:40:781 - 0800 1 147 101 {00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000} 0 0 MicrosoftUpdate success software sync Windows Update Client detected 1 updates successfully.

    4. from Winver: Version 5.1 (Build 2600.xpsp.080413 - 2111: Service Pack 3)

    As I suspected, the computer has a (very early) beta of SP3 installed. Uninstall, reboot twice, and then install Windows XP SP3 Final [1] & restart twice again.

    WinXP SP3 - read all the prerequisites for a successful installation
    http://msmvps.com/blogs/harrywaldron/archive/2008/05/08/Windows-XP-SP3-read-all-prerequisites-for-a-successful-installation.aspx

    Then go to http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com . Select CUSTOM and scan | Install all updates critical security available (only); Follow all the instructions. Subsequently, another CUSTOM scan to make sure that you have not missed any.

    Tip: Do NOT install IE8 via Windows Update! Just 'hide' for now, please. (Believe me).

    ========================================
    [1] HOW to get a computer running WinXP SP2 fully patched
    http://groups.Google.com/group/Microsoft.public.WindowsXP.General/MSG/a066ae41add7dd2b

    NB: You can skip step 4 in the link above.

  • Port-o-thon apps get a higher priority than other applications?

    My app has remained without any notice of approval or rejection on the portal provider since 10 January. Monday is the deadline BFB and my app even has not yet been approved. Yet I hear thousands of app flowing for port-marathons. What is going on? Port-o-thon apps are pushed in front of the priority queue?

    As you got ahead of the date limit Jan. 11, you should be able to rely on their guarantee that it will be approved before the deadline BFB. Presumably, if they cannot make their own commitment, he will come with something... maybe extend the period beyond 21 Jan BFB.

Maybe you are looking for