¿Does is a tablet which will start web java?

I want to buy a pc, for example, Samsung Galaxy, Ipad tablet... or similar, for me, it is not important the brand.

do you know if there is a tablet which can run a java web start application?

My application is compiled with jdk 1.4 and starts with a simple web .jnlp file.

799037 wrote:
Thanks friend.

Then, ¿does anyone know a particular model of tablet pc that is running JVM (and thus TJS)?

Read what I say: you need a tablet which runs a Linux OS or normal Windows. You run the JAVA virtual machine, JVM implementations for specific operating systems. It's your criteria: it must be able to run an operating system. Once you have, you can install the Java runtime on it.

Usually, this will be a laptop/netbook computer which can turn into a Tablet by turning the screen. Check your preferred opportunities computer online store, there are a few. Not really a Java question more either.

Tags: Java

Similar Questions

  • If I can put a music file in which will start playing when the mail is opened

    I want to put a music file in the body of the email which will start playing when the emaii is opened please let me
    whether it is possible in Thunderbird mail
    Thank you

    See this: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=39 & t = 79970 & start = 0

    I must say that I am not convinced that by using the specified HTML it could succeed to set the file musical itself. He would probably play if the sender displayed to himself and he opened on his own computer, because the file is local (always assuming that its authorized e-mail client reading.)

    Note that Thunderbird will not particularly play music embedded in messages, so if someone you send to use Thunderbird, they don't hear it.

    It is one of the reasons why I use Thunderbird. Besides having always cut sound. It can be very annoying having noise suddenly pop out of your computer in the workplace.

  • Is there a download from Microsoft which will create a bootable usb media that does not have the drivers?

    Original title: A bootable Windows 7 media

    I work on a Lenovo 2-in-1 with Windows 7 (for games) and 10 (for a normal use) Windows to dual-boot. I created a USB stick with Windows 7 Pro (64 bit) of a legitimate Windows 7 Pro disc. The computer starts on the usb device and plays normally, however, one of the steps asks a driver for cd/dvd and this 2-in-1 (Lenovo Flex 3) doesn't have a built-in CD/DVD. All other drivers are located in a folder system. My question is, given my key Windows 7 can I create a new bootable media that does not demand drivers? Is there a download from Microsoft which will create a bootable usb media that does not have the drivers? I know that I can reinstall the drivers manually after the installation.

    Thank you

    Matt Armshaw

    Windows 7 or Windows 10 come preinstalled?

    If you install Windows 7 on a system that is preinstalled with Windows 10, you must do the following before:

    -Disable the secure boot UEFI

    -Disable the quick start

    -L' install created media can be corrupted.

    How to: Dual Boot Windows 7 or Windows 8 with Windows installed 10 first

    I suggest that you try to create another bootable copy.

  • I buy 6 Lightroom from Amazon, received the album, but could not find a SN which will allow me to start the installation.  This sleeve is not, the FN is too short, the other number on the box is only 18 digits.  Help

    I buy 6 Lightroom from Amazon, received the album, but could not find a SN which will allow me to start the installation.  This sleeve is not, the FN is too short, the other number on the box is only 18 digits.  Help

    You posted in the wrong forum, this is the forum of Captivate. Can I move this question to the Lightroom forum?

  • Have Photoshop Elements since 2001.  A new computer with Windows 7 Professional 64 bit.  It does work on my new computer.  Which version is MORE SIMILAR to the old version that I have, which will take place on W7P - 64?  Thanks for any help.  Popjer

    Have Photoshop Elements since 2001.  A new computer with Windows 7 Professional 64 bit.  It does work on my new computer.  Which version is MORE SIMILAR to the old version that I have, which will take place on W7P - 64?  Thanks for any help.  Popjer

    You should probably just download the demo version of the EP 12 and see if you can live with it.

    Download a free trial version or buy Adobe products | Adobe Downloads

    That being said, you tried to install PES 1 on your computer?

    How much free space is on your hard drive?

    You have Internet Explorer 10 or 11?

    PSE 1 can run on windows 7 x 64, if certain conditions are met.

  • Firefox does NOT start, the removal and resettlement will start as the last step, but once Firefox is closed, it does NOT restart.

    Both browsers (Firefox 21 & IE) installed on my Widows XP 64-bit office refuse to start or click the icon on the desktop, the start menu bar or the executable files themselves. What happens is that all the icons disappear from the screen for 15-30 seconds, then the icons appear on the screen, and the last information message displayed from the system tray at the beginning upward is repeated.

    Firefox deleting and reinstalling will start the browser as the last step, but when the new copy is closed, it will not start. Also just restart the download installation without removing Firefox will be 'Upgrade' and start in last step, but when the new copy is closed, it cannot be restarted. Restore running on the new copy has apparent effect on the ultimate inability to restart after closing.

    I've only tried the Internet Explorer browser after being unable to start Firefox (its only usually used by States to update procedure) and have not studied either reinstall or repair.

    Did you use programs that I listed? All anti-malware programs to detect different things.

  • Please need help to earn 7 d drive to c drive which win xp is installed. computer will start?

    I have 2 drives. disc one i have win xp. disk b I have win 7. I want to switch to win 7 on the disk where win xp is located. is this possible? I have enough free space on the disk copy win 7. I want to assure you that my computer will start later.

    Thank you

    I have 2 drives. disc one i have win xp. disk b I have win 7. I want to switch to win 7 on the disk where win xp is located. is this possible? I have enough free space on the disk copy win 7. I want to assure you that my computer will start later.

    Thank you

    In your subject line you say C: and D: but in your text you say A: and B: as A: and B: are not possible, I assume you mean C: and D:.

    Sorry to tell you that you can't do what you want to do.

  • Microsoft support family does not - I can't ask a Web site adding the admin

    I set up a computer to a separate user and allow only Web sites that I approved.

    Recently the user tried to go to a Web site that is not on the approved list. They tried by e-mail a request to add the URL to the approved list, BUT when they click on your email request, the window do not appear which allows them to complete the application.

    I tried to manually add the site, but it still does not work.

    I found that adding through an application works better, but for some strange reason, it no longer works.

    Please advise on a solution

    Thank you

    This problem is persistent in recent weeks and hit in all Windows 7 users who I have spoken, but Microsoft still apparently does not respond when asked if they checked things on their end.

    In the meantime, I think I have a solution to your problem with the addition of the site manually.  I assume that you will on the Security Web site for the family, go to the green list and manually add it?  The filter is automatically updated after doing this. Go to the start menu and search for "parental controls." Open the program that simply says "Windows Live Family Safety" and look in the upper right corner for a refresh button. That should force the settings that you changed on the site is taken into account.

  • HD will start another mbp, but not its own

    I asked this question earlier but with no resolution. Then I will try again but more simply asking.

    Here goes:

    I have a 2010 mbp that works very well. I have an another 2011 mbp which does not start. It is suspended on a progress bar of the half.

    Notes on the 2011:

    -hd has been cleared with a clear three-pass. New El Capitan installed.

    -new RAM chips from Crucial

    -safe mode does not start

    -verbose mode does not start

    -single-user mode does not start

    -utility mode does not start

    SATA cable - is not the issue. A good known was traded with no effect.

    * If removed from the computer, the drive 2011 will start the 2010 via usb.* *.

    From there, I ran disk on her utility (el capitan) and happens without any problem.


    A spanking new SSD has been installed inside the 2011 and does not start the 2011 under any mode.


    I think it is safe to assume that the SSD and HDD of 2011 are working very well.

    What could be another that I can test?

    Logic board failure?

    If the logic board, is there a test I can run using the 2010?

    Thanks in advance for any input on this head-scratcher...

    You better Genius Bar appointment to show the circumstances you are facing with now.

  • Cannot start web server on the executable file

    Hello

    We have a problem with a Web server - we cannot get to initialize the help of nodes of property or the ini on a compiled executable file.

    As part of our application, we are starting the Web server to publish a status page to be read remotely. This works very well when we are running in the development environment and also when we run an executable a PC with installed development environment, however it will not boot on a PC with just the runtime installed.

    I have attached some of the code that functionally does exactly the same thing in our main application. I used this as my Tester code and built in an exe while trying a lot of different things to fix.

    When executing:

    • The code will sit in the while loop until I press stop.
    • Web server: Active Server = FALSE
    • Out error = ERROR No.

    In the full application the while loop waits a few seconds before throw an error if the server is not started. In this example, I can let the loop running for awhile without leave. Normally, the boot time is<50ms when="">

    It's the ini file to the executable file:

    [WebTest]
    server.app.propertiesEnabled = True
    Server.OLE.Enabled = True
    server.tcp.serviceName = "My Server computer/VI"
    server.vi.propertiesEnabled = True
    WebServer.Enabled = True
    WebServer.TcpAccess = "' + * '"
    WebServer.ViAccess = "' + * '"
    DebugServerEnabled = False
    DebugServerWaitOnLaunch = False

    And it is the Web server configuration file:

    ErrorLog "$LVSERVER_ROOT/logs/error.log".
    LogLevel 3
    The default server name
    DocumentRoot "$LVSERVER_ROOT /... /.. '. "/ www".
    Listen 8000
    ThreadLimit 10
    TypesConfig "$LVSERVER_ROOT/mime.types»
    DirectoryIndex index.html
    LoadModulePath "$LVSERVER_ROOT/modules '" $LVSERVER_ROOT/LVModules "" $LVSERVER_ROOT /... ".
    LoadModule LVAuth lvauthmodule
    LoadModule LVSnapshot lvsnapshotmodule
    LoadModule LVRFP lvrfpmodule
    LoadModule dir libdirModule
    LoadModule copy libcopyModule

    AddHandler LVAuthHandler
    AddHandler LVSnapshotHandler .snap
    AddHandler LVRFPHandler

    AddHandler dirHandler
    AddHandler copyHandler

    "CustomLog"$LVSERVER_ROOT/logs/access.log"'%%u %t \"%r\ hour' % > s %b.
    KeepAlive on
    KeepAliveTimeout 60
    Timeout 60

    As can side note, anyone tell me where the $LVSERVER_ROOT variable is configured?

    I tried the things:

    • Copy a new default configuration file before the entry into force
    • Writing a predefined file (encoded) before initializing config
    • Definition to root before initializing directory (it actually generates an error because the server is not active...)
    • Set WebServer.Active = TRUE several times inside the while loop
    • Toggle the web server in the ini file

    System:

    • LabVIEW 2010
    • PC with Windows 7 running

    Thanks for any help, because it makes me crazy slow!

    Ben

    Hi Marco, thanks for the reply.

    I have this guide was reviewed previously and had done all that he but a small section who gave me a hint of something to try and I have solved my problem, so thank you!

    If anyone is interested, here's the problem:

    The directive DocumentRoot folder in the config must exist or the Web server cannot be started. So basically, make sure that the file points to a folder that exists!

    This leaves two small annoying problems if - you can't see if the file exists (and then create it) before starting the Web server, because you can not query the path to the folder without the Web server running.

    AND

    You can't really define the configuration programmatically file as parameters from the file are responsible for execution, not on the start Web server.

    The result of this is that the config file and the folder root document should be created (and corresponding of course...) when the executable is built / installed on the system. Not a massive headache, but it means do not forget to put things in the build specification and do not rely on software to do the job at startup

  • which will cause 'notify() and wait()' mechanism no longer works?

    Hi all

    My application has worked for a few years, unless the user recently upgraded to OS7.1 and to try out my new device, all of a sudden, he is part works not properly.

    Appplcaition will download data from the server, long story Short,

    When there is no queue of download, application will wait until asked to download real.

    my code something like the follow up:

            InvokeContainer c = new InvokeContainer(r);
            synchronized (c.syncObj) {
                // push to queue
                synchronized (_queue) { _queue.addElement(c); }
                LogManager.getInstance().add("Notify queue Thread _queue size " + _queue.size());
                synchronized (_queueSyncObj) { _queueSyncObj.notifyAll(); }
                // wait for release
               // LogManager.getInstance().add("Invoke data wait to release");
                //synchronized(c.syncObj){
                    try { c.syncObj.wait(); } catch (Exception ex) {}
                //}
                LogManager.getInstance().add("Invoke data released");
            }
    
            while (!_stop) {
                InvokeContainer c = null;
    
                // wait for invoke
                c = getNextInvoke();
                if (c == null) {
                    LogManager.getInstance().add("Wait For next queue");
                    synchronized (_queueSyncObj) {
                        try {
                            _queueSyncObj.wait();
                            LogManager.getInstance().add("Invoked");
                        } catch (Exception ex) {
                            LogManager.getInstance().add("Exception happened: " + ex.toString());
                        }
                    }
                    c = getNextInvoke();
                    LogManager.getInstance().add("Get a new queue ");
                }
    

    My question is:

    my request always stop at the:

     LogManager.getInstance().add("Notify queue Thread _queue size " + _queue.size());
    

    and I saw there's a queue, waiting, however, the line after wait() never called.

    which will cause notify() citing not wait()?

    For me, in places, your code seems too complicated for what he seeks to achieve.  I'll try to simplify.

    First you have loads of protection around your creating a Singleton RuntimeStore object.  This seems pointless.  Take a look at this:

    http://supportforums.BlackBerry.com/T5/Java-development/create-a-singleton-using-the-RuntimeStore/TA...

    Go through your code, I wonder what follows:

    (1) public static synchronized IPCThread getServerInstance() {}

    Why is this it is synchronized?  Iron several people getting to this offers no additional protection.

    (2) synchronized (GlobalSync.getSyncObj (GUID))...

    This synchronized block offers no additional protection either.  Either the

    IPCThread will be there or it won't, there is no possibility of a race condition causes you a problem here.

    (3) public static synchronized IPCThread initServerInstance() {}
    synchronized (GlobalSync.getSyncObj (GUID)) {}

    Here, there might be some value to have only one person to create it at the same time.  But if it's a question, then the second person through should check if it has been created, this code is not.  Thus, each invocation of

    initServerInstance()

    will create and start a new IPCThread.  The synchronized are totally redundant and you have a potential hole in your treatment.

    (4) public synchronized static getInstance() {} IPCThread

    you have another way to get an IPCThread, which in fact is not identical to the above and, will be different if you start another instance of your Application, for example an alternative entry or a variant of starting.

    I recommend that you replace it with the unique getInstance() method based on article.  Do start the IPCThread if it creates.

    OK, I understand that you don't think that this is related to your problem, but with the code you have, there may be several IPCThreads and would not help.

    Now on your invocation code.

    Can you please remove static from the following:

    private static class InvokeContainer...

    As far as I KNOW, he does not buy you anything in this circumstance, and it confuses me.

    The idea here seems to be that you can provide an executable in this process, which it runs and then inform the task (if necessary) awaiting.  You pack the floor area in an InvokeContainer.

    The first thing to look at, it's how you entered extracting from the queue.  Here you protect with this line:

    synchronized (inasmuch)

    So what you're saying to me here, it's that you will protect this treatment in protecting access to the inasmuch.  Something we will add it to the queue. or something is going to take off it the queue, both may not occur at the same time.  That's ok.

    So how do add you to the queue?

    Ignoring the code that will process if the process id is the same, we get this:

    InvokeContainer c = new InvokeContainer (r);
    synchronized (c.syncObj) {}
    Push the queue
    synchronized (inasmuch) {_queue.addElement (c) ;}
    synchronized (_queueSyncObj) {_queueSyncObj.notifyAll () ;}
    wait for the release
    try {c.syncObj.wait () ;} catch (Exception ex) {}}
    }

    Now, we have already seen the queue is protected using "synchronized (inasmuch).  But this code will not prevent the entry we just added picked up before that we treat the notify - in other words, the notification cannot be taken into account.  But that's OK.  The reverse is not.  If the Thread that processes the code IPCThread is at this point:

    If (c == null) {}

    and the Thread that the addition of the transformation executes these two instructions:

    synchronized (inasmuch) {_queue.addElement (c) ;}
    synchronized (_queueSyncObj) {_queueSyncObj.notifyAll () ;}

    then the IPCThread will miss warn him.

    To fix this, I'll do what I suggested earlier.

    The way, this seems very strange:

    InvokeContainer c = new InvokeContainer (r);
    synchronized (c.syncObj) {...}

    but in fact, this means that the code will never fail of the treated IPCThread this practicable, since the notification

    synchronized (c.syncObj) {c.syncObj.notify () ;}

    Cannot run until this thread is waiting.  It's a good thing.

    So that leaves only one thing to discuss - the.invokeAsync.  This code looks good, if the

    synchronized (c.syncObj) {...}

    is completely redundant.

    Summary - 2 recommendations:

    (a) change your Singleton IPCThread to use the RuntimeStore method suggested in the KB article

    (b) check the inside of the protection of

    synchronized (_queueSyncObj) {}

    which

    c = getNextInvoke();

    is always set to null.

    Finally, have you thought about putting a delay time in your expectations, while without worrying about the activity or not, the Thread will pick up every now and again work?  For example:

    _queueSyncObj.wait (1000);

    Edit: Minor typo and readability...

  • When I click on Internet Explore (9). It will start to load, but then it just seems to stop loading. So I can't access the Internet at all the

    When I click on Internet Explore (9) to browse the Internet, it will start to load, but then it stops just loading. I have Internet connection that seems to work as I can access my emails with windows live. I have no idea why it will not load.

    Thank you

    So I get it open Internet Explorer and attempt to load the home page and stops without loading shows you a blank white page is that correct?

    If so, make sure that the address bar and try to type a web address there (bing.com for example)
    If I'm wrong and that Internet Explorer does not open
    Open the start menu and type internet and click Internet Explorer (no Addons)
    The void if these useful
    Open the start menu and type inetcpl.cpl press ENTER, go to the Advanced tab and press Reset.
  • Dimension 4600i will start only after I have press F1 to continue

    I have a Dell 4600i, BIOS v. A12, purchased in 2004. Well well, the IDE crashed hard disk so I replaced it with a 250 GB Seagate SATA (SATA 0). Install XP Pro without problem, (I DO NOT press F6 for RAID config part 3 drivers, don't think I'm being SATA connectors on the motherboard) but then had to restart machine and let's go... Was told that each player not connected are not (well since they are not connected). This includes s SATA, IDE primary, secondary IDE blah blah blah. He said nothing on the drive on which is connected, as it was detected but does not just go? And of course I get "F1 to continue, F2 for Setup.

    I press F1 and it starts with windows with no problems, works fine!

    All just annoying to have to press F1 each time that I reboot? The only way it will start without pressing F1 is to disable the other drives in the BIOS? I've 2 options in the section of the sequence of Boot, "Drive C" & "USB device"?

    There is no option for me select it in the BIOS to boot from "SATA (?)", JUST "drive C".

    In the section hard drive, alll readers are set to "auto-detect" and it does not recognize my SATA drive as primary.

    No idea how to fix this with turning off all other readers?

    Thank you


  • I'm on a macbook pro, and without knowing it, I turned to the vault of fire during a software update. The encryption process has begun. If I can't decipher, which will make my slow mac? or encryption is slow mac anyway?

    Hello

    I'm on macbook pro 13-inch (mid-2012), and without knowing it, I turned on the Arch of fire during a software update (El Capitan 10.11.5). The encryption process has started and if I don't want to read more, which will make my slow mac? or encryption is slow mac anyway?

    or at the end of the encryption process, my mac is slow?

    waiting for a quick response.

    Thank you

    Prosunkanti Sengupta

    I have a MacBook Air with active FileVault 2012. There is no significant difference in performance. Note, however, that there will be a performance impact until the original encryption is complete and that it doesn't have a way to stop it.

  • a lot of programs at startup. Can I get rid of some of them while my computer will start more quickly?

    a lot of programs at startup. Can I get rid of some of them while my computer will start more quickly?

    To identify what loads when you start using Autoruns (freeware from Microsoft).

    http://www.Microsoft.com/technet/sysinternals/ProcessesAndThreads/Autoruns.mspx

    With Autoruns, you can deselect an item which disables startup, or you can click with the right button on an item, then remove it. If you clear the check box that you can check back for re - activate the element. It is an approach much safer than editing the registry and better than using msconfig.

    Another useful feature of the program is that you can click with the right button on an item and select search online to get information about the selected item.

Maybe you are looking for