Download speed of MN-500 Base Station?

Similar Questions

• Speed upload a third download speed?

  Pay for 100 Mbit/s Up and Down. Download speed is close to that, but the download speed is less than 30% of that. Get the same results without worrying if I am connected via Wi - Fi (AirPort Extreme ac Tower) or Mac mini (end 2012) is directly connected via an Ethernet cable. Same results on Mac, iPhone and iPad, too.

  Here is some of the best. When a friend connected PC via Ethernet Dell midrange, he got 95 Mbps the two top and bottom. Same connection, even cable.

  Is there something on the hardware Apple or Apple by default network settings, which would explain this? Everything that can be done?

  

  Puzzled indeed! Not sure, at this point, why the PC is the only device not affected.

  I suggest that we start with the performance of your local network and then to go to the WAN - LAN interface with your AirPort base station.

  I use WiFiPerf from the App Store. There are versions for OS X and iOS. It's a little expensive, but there should be alternatives based on iPerf. It works on a client/server relationship and did a great job to measure flow rates of data on wireless networks.

  As an alternative, I would also suggest TamoSoft flow Test. It will test the wired and wireless connections. It's free, but they do not have a version of iOS, so you'll need another Mac or PC to make it work properly.

  No matter what you use, you will want to run the client on your Mac mini and supported the server on another device. Then create measures of your current network. For example, if your mini is connected to the base station via Ethernet and other Mac, also connected by Ethernet, you should see close reading of 1 Gbps for TCP with little or no errors. Similarly, you must take measures for Wi - Fi. You shouldn't get something close to that.

  If both measures are closer to what you want with your network, we know is not your local network, that is the question and we would move to the router-modem interface.

• Internet provider DOWNLOAD speed vs Airport Extreme

  Hello

  I had download speeds slow on my Airport Extreme for ipad, iPhone and imac.

  I have a modem connected via Ethernet cable to an ac Airport Extreme 802.11 Optimum.

  Ran to the application of speed test on my ipad II (within 5 feet of the airport).

  The results showed that the download is only 2.12mbps and upload is 24.97mbps. I pay for the 50mbps service.

  I tried the same thing by using a new iPhone SE and timed to 22,93 download and upload to 23.95. A little better but still not enough good.

  I contacted Optimum and they ran a couple of tests showing that my modem is online, signals are ideal, there is no loss of data to the modem and there is no failure in the region.

  They recommended connect a laptop directly to the router and without going through the airport. Will try it tonight to see the results.

  Assuming that the connection of the cable between the modem and the laptop is fast, what I can do to improve the speed of the WiFi?

  There is something to put in place at the airport? I guess there will be a reduction in speed between wired devices and WiFi but not this bad. What is the maximum number of devices (iphones, ipads or imacs) airport can support? I have at least 6 or more WiFi sharing schemes and wonder if this is the problem.

  Thank you

  Bob

  Please read using the Diagnostics wireless for you help to solve the problems of Wi-Fi on your Mac - Apple Support.

  What is the maximum number of devices (iphones, ipads or imacs) airport can support?

  Apple recommends 50. I got that three dozen sharing an Apple base station AirPort simultaneously with no noticeable performance degradation.

  The factor limiting the bandwidth will be the most restrictive of what follows, in no particular order:

  • your ISP
  • your local wireless environment, including other interference and competing wireless networks
  • the performance of the client machine
  • out of your control network conditions

  Your AEBS will not limit the bandwidth, but if you have reason to believe that it is, a "hard reset" is the only possible troubleshooting step. On rare occasions, an internal parameter becomes corrupted and this is the only way to fix it. By 'rare', I mean "almost never" and the last thing you should consider, after rule out all other possible causes of poor wireless performance.

• A key using self-powered USB causes the base station go "off-line".

  I found that by using a USB drive self-powered, as the WD My Passport, without a USB powered, hub attached to the base of the station USB port has caused the base station go "off-line". In fact, using a powered hub does not always remedy the situation, but it is more reproducible without one.

  This is true for the AirPort Extreme and Time Capsule 802.11ac. The problem does not occur immediately, but it may happen over several days. The symptom is that the player is no longer lies in the Finder, or the base station appears in AirPort Utility.

  My question is if others have had the same results? ... and did you find permanent solutions?

  

  USB key "seems" less reliable on the airports of AC model than on previous versions.

  I tend to not use USB attached to routers because I think it's convenient mediocre and poor speeds. But I tested with previous models, and it seems ok...

  KT those a few posts here a me trial there. These are not self powered readers... who I have long recommended people avoid the use (without a powered hub)...

  Re: External backup drive down regularly

  In fact, the wire is different from what I remember... Age don't you know.

  But I did the test on an AC TC. The result has been very reliable. He did not cause the TC to close... but I lost the connection of the USB almost every day... except for a trial where I kept the USB drive mounted in the Finder... so that the USB drive wouldn't turn it down. He then worked for a few weeks... until what the noise of rotation of disk (sitting next to me) drove me crazy... as soon as he was mounted is more, he would pass the same existence as before.

  The previous model TC was barely big enough for the internal use of the power supply units. So powered car running disc was impossible.

  Provide EI (GEN 1-5) at 1. 8A and 12v was adequate, but the standard USB port is estimated at 500 my wrong to manage disks free power.

  You would certainly think AC 12v 5A power supply models would have a lot of power. Yet, power problems are a major problem still. Supply is extremely sensitive and stop easily for reasons I'm still to understand.

  Where the long threads on power issues to the AE.

  Now, I'm going to speculate... I think that SOME problems are associated with power.

  What is the USB port side in airports of AC? Is it still 500ma? Apple never seem to give easy to find info on these details.

  Do you know? I haven't measured it, but I can try timing the time it takes to charge a phone.  Assuming that it will immediately trigger.

  Then he will have problems with a self-powered drive. Even if the drive has less energy than quotes, current during starting is much higher. The restriction of the power on the USB port is managed by a self regulator recovery... Once you triggered it, you must stop the power... then reboot the machine to restore power.

  Then, I also did the test with hub powered... and like your results... It was better. Longer time between the drive disappears from the network. But it was not enough to stop it.

  There is another interesting effect using self-powered hubs... I discovered this on a computer running Mac OS lets say! The computer would not start with a powered hub connected to the front USB. Hubs self-powered cheap, showing a defect in their design. They can refer to the USB port. In this computer, it was enough to stumble on the good power circuit and prevent the supply, commissioning... As long as the computer is running, everything was fine... but if I turned off it would not start. I finally woke up I had to exit the USB every time. At one point, I made a "special" Cup USB cable 5v line so the hub can stay connected. You can probably just to isolate the 5v of contact in the USB. Regardless of the configuration of power USB in the AE or TC is as you can assume she's sensitive enough... and at any time when the 5V on USB hub exceeds the 5V in AE it could trigger.

  The symptom is that the player is no longer lies in the Finder, or the base station appears in AirPort Utility.

  Endangered of AU base station is not uncommon.

  It responds to the pings? I guess he still has lights but is he blocked? You still get internet through it?

  Try to open it manually in to THE... use of the file / configure from others and put the IP address of EI.

  Talk with me by e-mail... It is open in the profile.

• Converted to new DOCSIS 3.0 modem and my MN-700 router is slowing down my download speed of 2/3, same if wired?

  I'm glad my MN-700 and will not change if don't have to.

  I recently changed my modem (Motorola SB6120) with DOCSIS 3.0 technology (Comcast).

  When go directly from modem to pc = 35 Mbps download speed when the download speed of the modem to MN-700 electrician and electrician from router to pc = 12 Mbps? Is there a setting I need to change on the base station to make sure that the router does not lose speed?

  Thank you for your help.

  Hi AlSaffarian,

  You can follow these links and check if the problem persists:

  The problems of Internet connection

  Network connection problems

  Hope the helps of information.

• Why my download speed goes down when I try to download sierra of macos?

  I am trying to download sierra tacos my download speed will 5megabytes per second to 500 KB / s... Is there a problem with the servers or am I the only one who has this problem?

  I imagine that millions of fans all around the world are trying to download at once. That's what usually happens with a new OS x (Mac OS). It is to be patient with the slow download or give it a day or two until that things have settled a bit.

• How can ensure me that I am connected to the Wan, not the Base Station?

  I have one extreme as a base station, with an express the upstairs of the extension of the network. There are green lights on both, the utility displays the Express connected to the extreme and it is not a big house, so it seems that the network is configured correctly.

  However, when I'm near the Express, my MacBook Pro connection speed is significantly slower: 9Mbps, vs 30Mbps when close to the extreme. As far as I know, I am always connected the low extreme, rather as the Express I sit beside.

  Is there a way to say that I am connected to? Or y at - it a way to choose who to connect to?

  Thank you-

  In AirPort Utility, click images extreme and Express. A list of connected devices appears in the windows that appear.

• The Apple AirPort Express Base Station is a good solution?

  I'm moving so leaving the wifi station that Verizon gave me. I think I have the Apple AirPort Express Base Station by station WiFi. I connected an iMac (main computer) MacBook Pro, iPad, iPhone.

  My main question is how this used for the WiFi base station compares to others on the market.

  Thank you!

  Johnny

  The AirPort Express has limited the ability of speed due to its slow and limited capacity wireless Ethernet port due to its very small built in WiFi antennas.

  However, if the plan of your new Internet Service Provider (ISP) is limited to about 50 Mbit/s, then the Express would probably be OK if most wireless devices will be located near the AirPort Express Terminal.

  If the budget allows, an AirPort Extreme is a much better product... up to 10 times the speed of the Express... with additional WiFi antennas located just above the 'tour' to improve performance.

  If your new ISP plan is 100 Mbps or higher, then AirPort Extreme would be a better match.

  If you are considering other routers from other manufacturers... we cannot comment at all on their performance without knowing the number of brand and model of the device you are considering.

• The Airport 5.6.1 (10 Windows) utility cannot find Airport Extreme Base Station

  I have the Airport Extreme Base Station (model A1408) model.

  I'm under Apple Airport Utility 5.6.1 on Windows 10.

  10 Windows Firewall is disabled.

  All of my WiFi devices, including my Windows laptop, 10, all work fine on the wireless network, and the light on the base station is green.

  Life seems good... EXCEPT, when I run the utility Apple Airport (version 5.6.1) it says it's "impossible to find wireless Airport". Clicking on Rescan is fixed not. Power by bicycle to the base station doesn't fix it. It worked before, so this is the behavior seems to be somewhat intermittent. Lately, it doesn't quite work. So I can't reconfigure my base station.

  Is this a known issue? Y at - it a known solution?

  First of all, understand that the AirPort for Windows utility has not been updated since Windows 7. It 'works' on later versions of Windows, including Windows 10, but is not designed to work with the new 802.11ac base stations.

  We'll see if this utility is installed correctly on your computer.

  For Windows 8, 8.1, or 10, AirPort for Windows utility will work have two applications listed in the window Apps & features: 1) airport & 2) Hello.

  • Move or delete the file next to the C:\Windows\System32 folder: c:\windows\system32\dnssd.dll (Note: this is the Client Hello library and is required by the utility AirPort.) If this file is missing would be the main reason that you aren't able to find the base station. However, even if it is present, it cannot be properly registered in the Windows registry. In other words, Windows is concerned, there is no.)
  • Download AirPort for Windows install.
  • Run the Setup program by using privileges "Run as administrator". (Note: If you have the option to repair or uninstall, choose the option to uninstall.) To complete the uninstall process. The Hello application should now be missing in Apps & features list.)
  • If you do not dialogue to repair/Uninstall window, then let Setup install AirPort for Windows in its default folder.

  Then, make sure your computer cable or wireless network adapter is configured for IPv6.

  Now, try to access the base station with the utility again.

• Connection printer HP AirPrint from Apple extreme base station.

  Hi, I had a "wps pin code" generated printer to enter my network extreme apple but cannot find where it enter. Use "airport utility" and selecting my extreme and then enter my password of network that I was expecting to see a secondary to the title of "base station" menu where I can enter a wps PIN, but nothing shows up?

  If the AirPort Utility is obsolete, please update in the App Store or download the last update on the Apple Support site. Then launch the application and follow the instructions of his help under the topic "add a printer to your network.

• Purchase of 3rd Apple Airport Extreme Base Station

  My current 2 Apple Airport Extreme Base Stations (the two 5th generation) are implemented as shown in the screenshot below.

  My fiber service (80 MB/s) is hard directly on an Apple Airport Extreme Base Station plugged into my home office (via an Ethernet cable that connects from the box of fiber on the outside wall of my house to this AE).

  While AE is hard wired to a 2nd AE in a separate building in my back yard (via an underground conduit of PVC).

  Wired connection that's not a separate Ethernet cable.

  Instead, my provider of fiber spliced in an existing telephone cable that already existed.

  Currently hard connected directly to that 2nd AE in the building separated (via Ethernet cable) are the following:

  My Dell Precision Tower 5810

  My Canon imageCLASS MF6160dw (all-in-one)

  Printer color of my Epson Stylus Pro WF-5190

  (Suite after screenshot)

  

  I am replacing a very old 30 "TV Sony with a 60" LED Smart TV & want to run an Ethernet cable from the AE 1st in my home office to the living room where will be the TV.

  My intention is to add a Roku at the same place than television.

  In addition, I want to increase my wifi signal in the room.

  I know that the Express is 1/2 the cost of the extreme, but will most likely go to the extreme. - If the extreme will give me faster speeds for my Roku and TV.  In addition, I like to have the additional ports available if I ever sign anything else.

  My fiber Service is 80 MB/s Up & Down, but I regularly receive about 96 +.

  80 MB/s is no longer offered by my supplier of fiber, but I'm grandfathered in.

  The available speeds are now 45 (?) with the speed of 100 Mbps.

  I think I'm really on 100 Mbps service.

  QUESTIONS :

  The 2nd AE has been "extended" EI from 1.

  Just as "extend" the 3rd AE?

  For speed best / highest in the living room, the most recent AE should be in the living room next to the TV & the Roku, or he would replace the 1st AE who is in my home office since it is one that is connected directly to the box of fiber on the outside wall of my house?

  Other recommendations will be greatly appreciated.

  The 2nd AE has been "extended" EI from 1.

  Just as "extend" the 3rd AE?

  Yes, either by connecting to the extreme 1... recommended, if possible... .or extreme 2nd... If it is not convenient to connect to the 1st.

  For speed best / highest in the living room, the most recent AE should be in the living room next to the TV & the Roku, or he would replace the 1st AE who is in my home office since it is one that is connected directly to the box of fiber on the outside wall of my house?

  Locate the extreme new... which has a much better arrangement... wireless antenna where it provide the most benefits to nearby wireless devices.

  Otherwise, you might want to consider renaming your airports, because the current device names far exceed the recommended length name a 26 characters max, including spaces. Keep the name short and simple wireless network as well... and to avoid special characters in the name... as an apostrophe, a sign dollar, asterisk, etc..

• Slow download speed after downgrading to Windows 7 64 bit

  Hi all!

  I'm new here! My first laptop is a Toshiba Satellite since 2003. Since then, I got one couple of others.
  Now I bought a new: Satellite P70-A-11V, a portable professional high-end computer, which came with Windows 8, which I upgraded to 8.1.

  Unfortunately, the degraded system so bad that all pendrives made plant. I have connected my Toshiba camcorder, and it also crashed the laptop. The search indexing was not working outside the C: drive. The pointer of an optical mouse has started to freeze for seconds on the screen.

  This last problem, which I think was due to the low power USB ports. So, I really had no choice after 2 restorations system total and installed Windows 7 Enterprise x 64 SP1. The operating system seems ok, but I always have problems, and one of them is that my download speed is very low, as well with LAN cable or wireless. I can't tell how is download speed.

  My internet provider provides 100 MB/s internet access via optical cable. I test on Speedtest.net and normally, it gives a range of 50 to 80 Mbps actual download speed. Then, if I check the speed of the connection Wireless wireless connection status, I experience a maximum of 130 MB/s, which is constant. Large.
  Yet, no download occurs at a speed of wretched 400 to 500 kbit/s, as if it was a dial-up connection. This problem was not present before.

  I tried to change several settings according to the forums, but nothing helped. I disabled the firewall and stimulated wireless (duplex 100 MB) and also tried through LAN cable. The rated speed is great, but apparently the slowness problem is inside the laptop, not outside. Any ideas will be greatly appreciated!

  I checked the Toshiba download page and your laptop is fully supported for Win7 64 bit. Drivers LAN and WLAN are available also so I hope that you have installed all the drivers, tools, and utilities including LAN and WLAN. Can you confirm this?

• Base stations automatically choose roaming configuration overlapping channels overlap

  I have a roaming configuration, as shown in the photo. When I select Auto channel (on 2, 4 or 5 GHz) selection every now and then the base stations choose the same channel, which causes interference. On 2.4 GHz is easily solved by manually selecting the channels not bunk.

  5 GHz, however, manual channel selection is not a solution. All three base stations use wide channels in 5 GHz (the Airport Express does not support dual band and only uses 5 GHz). A selection of no cumulation of the channels would be channels 36, 44 and 52. However, the only available channels for the manual selection of the Netherlands are 36, 40, 44 and 48. So I need to use the automatic selection on at least a base station, which unfortunately results in channels that overlap every now and then.

  I know that the base stations should choose the channels not bunk by themselves, but apparently they do not always. Does anyone know a solution for this? My current solution, when the wifi is flaky, is to use the application Explorer of Wifi to see if there are stations base using the same channel and if so, restart the base station "at fault." Obviously not an ideal solution. The second photo shows my current channel selection. 5 GHz channels are set to automatic and are currently not overlapping. The network dlink is not mine.

  

  I understand the problem... This is the European version especially airports that restricts the use of channels in automatic configuration. I do not understand why Apple does. Other brands are not. USA or where I am in Australia, I have a much larger selection and channels... Same as the automatic selection.

  Try something... Instead of using the non-overlapping channels, try to use the same channels. This amounts to extend wireless, when you think about it. In time both the base and expand the unit and can transmit or receive at the same time... (not to each other of course) but to other customers. And it works well.

  Test if this will cause a slowdown of your use wireless... control somewhere between the units where it is possible, a client may bind to one or the other... Disable one and test the speed of the link (actually transfer a file... not just a link speed)... now, close the other device and redo the test... so you know what transfer speed can be expected from each single unit. Now run the two units on the same channel, say 36. What result do you get this?

• 802.11 wireless extend ac / 802.11n Base Stations

  Hello

  I tested the following wireless extend the installation program:

  (1) modem connects Airport Extreme 802.11ac running--> Wireless extends another Airpot extreme running 802.11ac

  (2) modem connects Airport Extreme 802.11ac--> wireless running extends an another old Time Capsule running 802.11n

  If I connect a device to the base station of second (an extensive wireless), I think that option 1 would give a better performance? Since that they are extended wireless with 802.11 ac. But after this test, it seems that the performance is similar in both configurations. It's supposed to be like that or there is an option I'm aware of that allows you to establish which wireless standard ask?

  Thank you very much.

  Found the similar thread that answers my question:

  https://discussions.Apple.com/thread/6521335?start=0&TSTART=0

  "TC and airports rank by the strength of the signal, no signal speed."

  Although they are not separate FAT portion, but I guess that my base stations connect via 802.11n channel after all.

• Download speed very slow on laptop HP G62

  I just bought a new laptop HP, the Intel i3 G62, everything I download a maximum of 33 kbps. My last laptop was at least 450-500 kb/s.

  Its the same wireless router and I don't know why he wouldn't just download at normal speed?

  Also why the Fn key is locked on and how disable you it on this model?

  Thanks in advance for any help

  PROBLEM * PROBABLY * SOLVED!

  Well, I tried something I should have done immediately: download the latest driver wireless.

  After you have installed the latest driver for my G62-340US laptop wireless, I'm finally reaching internet download speeds similar to my office (which is connected directly to the router).

  I will edit this post once I have do some testing LAN speed, but it looks very promising so far...

  EDIT:

  Yep, LAN speeds are where they should be with my current wireless router.

  Anyone else having a problem with slow download speeds should update their driver.