Editing native AVCHD - making artifacts

Similar Questions

• Import and editing of AVCHD in CS4 video sequences with a 32-bit Windows computer

  I have a question about AVCHD video:

  We have some AVCHD (.mts) sequences, we filmed with a Sony HXR-NX30.

  Is it possible to import, edit and export (on DVD) this sequence ".mts" with Premiere CS4 in a reasonable quality?

  I have a 32-bit windows computer, and want to know before you buy such a video editing program.

  Thank you

  Rob

  Never found CS4 buggy.

  You can import avchd in CS4, but being on a machine 32 bits edition will be slow.

  You will have to restore everything in the timeline.

• Back to the first, Final Cut. Help editing native RED r3d

  I am one of the many new converts to first Pro CS5.5 of Final Cut after many years using the Apple software. I want to dive into the heart and start editing with Premiere, but I meet an immediate obstacle.

  First, I heard the discussion without end on ability Premiere Pro to edit RED raw images natively. Simply drag the files r3d and go. Yet, I could not even get the first get me this far in my editing workflow. I've been working with RED images, and in the past, I've been transcoding in Final Cut Pro Res (Proxy) and compliance/online to the end, using newspapers and transfer or RED alert. Naturally, I was very happy to be able to drop them into native files of RED and never have to online to the end. Here comes my problem: I drag in a recent session r3d files. 4 k 23,967 suddenly on RED. I double click the clip in my project to open it in the monitor source and all I get is black. I can't rub, I can't playback video or audio to make my cuts; all I get is timecode. HOWEVER, if I drag the file r3d directly in the timeline, I get image / its and all. Of course, it is not possible to change and I can't just be filing lots of clips in the sequence and try from there. Like any editor, I want power double click my clip, rub through it in the source monitor and find the particular plug, I want to use. THEN I add to my calendar.
  
  WHY am I not able to view/edit r3d believed in my monitor source files? Everyone knows about this problem? Frustrated and unable to start using this first highly touted (who all my heart, I want to believe in). Please ask me if I can get running with my RED images. In the meantime, it's to Final Cut 7...

  I should mention that I use a Quad-Core Intel Xeon 2.4 GHz Mac Pro with 15 GM of Ram and an ATI Radeon HD 5770 graphics card. I've heard talk about NVIDIA is the way to go, but we're not the upgrade/change cards in the immediate future. For now, it is what I use. I hope this isn't the only reason that I can not read/see anything in my monitor source with my r3d files.

  
  Thank you

  
  Daniel

  OK, the Blackmagic card and its drivers would have been a first mention, simply because this can change how things are set up in Premiere Pro.

  Just to clarify: you see anything in the Source monitor? It seems that your ProRes clips worked there...?

  In Premiere Pro preferences, go to player settings and check what drive module that you use (should be Adobe Player or BMD one); try changing it and see if something changes in the SM.

• Mini Netbook - Windows 7 Starter Edition - are you making fun of me having to BUY a copy of the House or other?

  I don't know if it's the right place to ask, but MS is a joke that I have to upgrade my new height of about $119 the Win 7 Starter netbook that accompanies it?  I'm having flashbacks on the disks 'step-up' to buy every week it seemed to BACK 6... was it?  Man, I'm sad.

  Hello

  Just to clarify things a little.

  Originally, very early in the beta version of Windows 7 (Jan/Feb 2009), Microsoft drew the Windows 7 Starter edition for new markets the technology like Windows XP Starter and Windows Vista starter editions have been designed. It was OEM that pushed Microsoft companies to make the Windows 7 Starter edition available for OEM Netbook market.

  Microsoft responded by the Starter edition available for OEMs and replaced by the basic edition of Windows 7 Home Edition for emerging technology markets. The restrictions contained in the Starter edition were well known and announced at least 6 months.

  You can upgrade the Windows 7 Starter to Home Premium edition for about 80 USD, using Windows Anytime Upgrade.

  I hope this helps.

  Thank you for using Windows 7 Ronnie Vernon MVP

• Could not import the native avchd sony fs700

  Hi all

  I can't import avchd which was shot sony fs700. It seems that this happens only the camera sony fs700. The other cameras that record avchd works fine.

  This seems to be a very recent thing that I've always been able to import files shot in fs700.  I use first cc with the last update.

  Any help appreciated.

  I copied the files from an sd card and imported how I did in the past.

  I read of some that he had problems with the latest patch and uninstalling and reinstalling should solve the problem. I did and that solved my problem.

• Graphics cards (what will work?-Minimum to run CS6)

  Hello

  The community has been very helpful so far, thank you!

  I'm looking for purchase first CS6 and run it on a computer with a processor AMD Phenom II 6 with 8 GB of ram. The video card is a Radeon 2 gig model, not on the list supported for graphics acceleration. It'll work at all, or do I need to have a new graphics card (I don't like on the GPU acceleration)? The rest of my configuration meets or exceeds the minimum requirements.

  Keep in mind that I don't do much in the way any type of newsreel of the effects etc., shoots and interviews for my portfolio. CS6 is the only version available in my school at a discount and will be going to the service cloud in may, so I want to act now and get a copy to use in the coming years.

  Thank you

  CM

  RjL190365 wrote:

  medeamajic wrote:

  http://youtu.be/BJLIwxaaiyA

  Your system should work OK but will modify you half-resolution instead of the full resolution when you use AVCHD. You can watch the video link. An i7 and inexpensive GT 640 would work well for editing native AVCHD but a GTX 650 it would be even better.

  Two of these GPUS are somewhat unbalanced with a processor i7, mainly due to their relatively low graphics memory bandwidth: 28.5 Gbps and 86.4 GB/s, respectively. However, there is a new version of the GTX 650 it which just introduced: the GTX 650 it Boost (make sure that it says specifically "push" after the "GTX 650 Ti"). This GPU has the same 768 hearts CUDA as the regular GTX 650 Ti, but with a lot more bandwidth memory (144 GB/s against 86.4 GB/s).

  You are incorrect about the GTX 650 it. It can read several layers of matttes of track using native AVCHD in full resolution. The GPU GTX 650 it is infact a bottleneck by the CPU. The i7 will choke and 100% after four layers of native AVCHD. The GPU GTX 650 TI could easily reproduce only 8 PIPs provided native AVCHD i7 CPU can decode as many layers, but it may not. Don't forget that the original poster of this thread won't do a lot of fancy effects. As the GT 640 might be a better buy based on the users needs. I agree the GTX 650 it boost would be peform better than the standard GTX 650 it but the i7 would be the neck of the bottle not GTX 650 it. I just wanted to correct Miss information.

• First Pro CC is supposed to work correctly with AVCHD?

  I have recurring problems trying to edit with AVCHD. I have a processor 17 imac with 8 GB of ram. I'm on Yosemite 10.10.5. Whenever I try to edit AVCHD, video has frame jumps to the Middle the clips which were divided when recorded. Sometimes an audio of another element is automatically joined with the video clip bad when I drag from the project panel into a timeline.

  It's really supposed to be this much trouble? I also clip numbering issues when I get my SD card in first. It will start turns off fine recording with file 000. MTS, but sometimes after obtaining a random number in the sequence of the clip as 004. MTS, it will make a new clip go back to 000. MTS everywhere and I'll absent fottage because it will overwrite the clip that was supposed to 000.mts. None of this happens as the clip after that 004. MTS is 005. MTS in the finder window, but not in the first.

  bryced87 wrote:

  Yes, I did. I hear some people all transcode AVCHD to prores on Mac

  Yes, if the project has value I. If it is very simple or non-consecutive, I have not.

  Because Adobe can't handle AVCHD with large maturities.

  I found that this was the case. You must have a fast computer with a good graphics card and fast storage for your media.

  I am currently working on an iMac of 2013 with 3.5 Ghz i7 CPU, Nvidia 780 M with 4 GB of VRAM and 32 GB of memory, connected to the drive via Thunderbolt and not having problems bays.

  Also read that the color correction is not as good with AVCHD and AVCHD is rendered every time or an effect is applied it degrades the quality in first.

  This is because AVCHD is an acquisition very, very compressed and, to a lesser extent, the codec of the delivery. It is designed mainly for the purpose and is far from the ideal editing codec.

  Your original image from the sensor was shattered tightly in a very tiny package, with 8 (or more) images stuck like a saw jumping puzzle in each box.  Your computer, on the fly, must unpack every box, rebuild management (separating each one from the other) 30 times per second. Compare that to ProRes, resembling a giant shipping cases, each case containing 1 full frame. Your computer has to work much less to display and manipulate images ProRes - but the trade-off is a much larger file size.

  Box of ProRes being much larger, when you add graphics, composites, etc. of your sequence, the resulting video image has no need to be smashed down to fit in a small box - the shipping case ProRes adapts easily. If the color correction, compositing, graphic overlays, etc. ' "less pain during editing.

  "Degradation" of decompression of the frame of AVCHD, add a graphic and recompression of the frame to AVCHD happen not matter what NLE you use.

  Video to ProRes or Cineform benefits far beyond the subsequent use of more disk space and the camera card. That's why many productions use outboard recorders that will record in ProRes, typed cameras that shoot AVCHD natively. They are much better production formats.

  MtD

• How to deal with the Panasonic HDC - HS900 AVCHD Full HD 60 so that it generates same Full HD 60 p?

  How to edit HDC - HS900 AVCHD Full HD 60 Panasonic using create so that it generates same Full HD 60 p?

  You did not say what product your film going.

  Simply drag images in the timeline, and it will make a corresponding sequence. First edition native.

  You will not be able to make a BluRay disc with 60 p to 60i (this is done to export)

  If you want to keep the 60 p and then export to mp4. That you can play on any PC, Media Player and more modern TV.

• AVCHD video

  I do a lot of editing AVCHD video and MTS files.  Should I be editing them just as they are in first or can I use the media encoder to change them to another format?  The issue I'm having is that the video seems not as bright in Adobe when I change it as it does when I play the video in Windows Media Player or on the camera.  Thank you.

  First editions native mts. Make sure that the reading is set to full.

  Copy the whole map on hard drive and ingest via Media Browser.

  Video and audio glitches. AVCHD video

• Any advantage to transcode AVCHD P2?

  I'm editing Panasonic AVCHD images from a camcorder in PP CS6 AC130. PP seem to handle AVCHD without any problems, other than a bug in a hover scouring. However, I have Panasonic utility for converting AVCHD P2 footage. It is a relic of a time when NLE couldn't import AVCHD video directly.

  Here's my question: is there an advantage to transcode AVCHD P2 before opening the images in PP? Panasonic indicates that the converter is lossless, so I think that there might be some advantage to decompress before boarding in PP. The most obvious conversion would cost larger file on my hard drive. Are there benefits which would offset this cost? Thank you.

  Unless you encounter the problems described in

  this document about the known bug of AVCHD in CS6

  I would not transcode anything... just edit in native mode.

  Panasonic indicates that the converter is lossless,

  so I think there might be some advantages

  Uncompressing before loading in PP.

  Which would be better described as relative to thecompression.

  If you are prone to transcode your media before installation.

  I would recommend using one of these codecs instead:

  http://forums.Adobe.com/message/5368571#5368571

• Decompression of AVCHD?

  Hey guys,.

  I recently bought a Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS19K of 220,00 (great deal!) and it records AVCHD 1920 x 1080 60 p at 28-30 Mbit/s throughput. The quality is not bad, I like to just work with files uncompressed as YUV 4:2:2, etc. Given that I have download on YouTube, which compresses like crazy, I want to keep crisp image that I receive on my monitor on YT so... Now, I understand that AVCHD uses an exclusive algorithm to compress the data so he can write it on a standard SD card. I want to decompress the video in an uncompressed format (opposite of compression), but various google searches resulted in answers 2008-old ish.

  If there is anyone of you who knows how to unzip compression on CS6 (I bought the master collection... expensive), please share the info.

  As for my material, I'm an avid player, so my PC serves a double purpose when editing PS I use windows 7

  Here is my card

  Intel 3770 K @ watercooled 5.2 Ghz by rad 360mm XSPC (more than 24 hrs of O.C to get here)

  16 GB MEMORY DDR3 @ 1866

  ASRock OC formula Council
  

  4 x 1000 GB Carviar Black drives in RAID 0 @ 420 reading / writing of 380

  ASUS GTX 560 Ti (in the reading Mercury engine config)
  

  LSI 9207-8i RAID card

  4 x 830's Samsung 128 GB RAID 0 reading seq: 2014 mb/s write Seq: 1228 MB/s

  
  

  I thought that the compression worked as a .zip or .rar file.

  It depends on the type of compression used.  Zip and RAR are lossless, which means that you can reproduce the original, exactly as it was.  There are methods to video compression without loss, such as Lagarith and UT codecs, but AVCHD (or whatever it is based MPEG) is not one of them.  Even ProRes and DNxHD are not lossless.

  Now, the reason why it is important to understand is that you don't see a compressed video signal.  It must be unzipped for you to see.  PP decompress each image as it shows.  A reader DVD or Blu - ray will do the same.  Windows Media Player and QuickTime Player, the Flash player on the web page of YouTube, all decompress the video so you can see.  And despite claims to the contrary, only give you pouvez was rejected during compression, you need to put back in order to see the image.

  The question is how precisely it is given.  With the lossless compression codecs, it gets delivered exactly as it was originally, without alteration.  With lossy as AVCHD compression codecs, there are always errors to recreate what was rejected during compression.  These errors are called artifacts.

  Here's the point I'm getting at.  Once the image is compressed using a codec like AVCHD, these artifacts of decompression are will appear if PP he unzips for viewing or another program unzips into a new uncompressed file.  You can't avoid it.  There is not enough data to restore the image without errors, any hardware or software does the work of decompression.  That's why people say there is no need to turn your AVCHD in uncompressed for editing.  Errors will be displayed without worrying.  All you do by converting is waste time and disk space.

  Working with uncompressed YUV 4:2:2 is a good idea, but unfortunately it is not a camera on the market that can do it.  The only 'exception' could be the new movie camera in black magic, that allows to record RAW CinemaDNG lossless files.  But it is an expensive proposition with a headache of a workflow.  Other that that, each camera there compresses the video somehow, throwing data causing errors appears when decompressed.  Even the cameras RED is using Peter Jackson for The Hobbit are not fully lossless.  Of course, mistakes are likely to be so small and insignificant that no one will ever see them.

  While the AVCHD codec will generate more errors than Redcode RAW, it is still a fairly clean codec set.  Errors are likely to have escaped most of the people in most situations.  So, for your shipments of YouTube, you're fine just using AVCHD camera media.

• First Pro CS5.5 will solve the problem of editing of images 1080/60 p Panasonic?

  According to Adobe... What follows is a CS5.5 feature:

  Native AVCHD support

  Import and get content natively from Sony AVCHD, Panasonic, and Canon cameras without transcoding or conversion of the content. Use the media browser to browse clips and view metadata - including metadata from Panasonic AVCCAM cameras.

  However, this means we can natively edit filmed in 1080/60 p on the Panasonic (TM - 700, TM - 900) or we're still stuck with having to "unpack" these images because of the compression system owner of Panasonic on the images of 60 p?

  I would like to buy one of these camcorders, but if his is going to be a pain to edit in Premiere Pro... so maybe I'll wait or get another brand that does not have need of all these hassles.

  Can someone comment?  Adobe?

  use a sequence of 1080/30 p, 1080/60i format or or something else?

  Another thing: 1080 p 60. It may be a mailing or delivery specification, but first can create a sequence using these settings. The best way to do this is to simply drag a clip to the button new item at the bottom of the project Panel. This will create a sequence corresponding to your clip settings and place clamp inside. You can then add your other clips if necessary.

  Personally, I'd go 720 p 60 on BD, instead of 1080i60; I think that it is better to match your cadence and cadence instead of trying to match the raster and introduce the interlacing. The 1080 p 60 material should generate a pretty nice 720 p 60 content.

• 10.1.1 iMovie crashes while editing

  Hello!

  I tried to edit my AVCHD (103 clips, 30 minutes) video clips and iMovie crashes all the time. The error message on the Console is "iMovie: error AVF: ability to Perf check failed: 0xe00002bc"and something like"..". otherwise taken iMovie causing excessive Awakenings... »

  What can I do?

  I did this kind of work with iMovie several times without crashing.

  My operating system is Yosemite 10.10.5

  This error seems to be similar to the 50 error and a mistake is made. This indicates in general media corruption or it could be a corruption of transition/title. Not easy to solve, you can extend the chronology and scan slowly clips to see if something strange happens. Another approach is to fork the project, remove half of it and see if that will export. Continue to iterate this process until you find the corruption. Not funny, but I've not seen any other suggestions.

• Chronology of Lag with AVCHD (MTS) files

  We have been editing with AVCHD MTS files for years without any problems.  In the last week we have timeline lag when editing.  When the timeline scrub the video pauses for 30 seconds before starting again.  He's playing very well until you stop it.  Move to another part of the timeline and you sit and wait.

  We test and all passed: processor, hard drive, RAM, video card

  System:

  Windows 10

  OS & software on SSD, media on separate disk

  CPU Intel I7 4930K

  T.I. card video GeForce GTX 780

  32 GB OF RAM

  Hello

  Please go to Edit Menu of Premiere Pro > Preferences > Media and uncheck the option "Enable accelerated h.264 decoding Intel."

  Once done restart Premiere Pro and check the performance.

  Vinay

• Turning switch guide leaves strange artifacts on workspace

  Since the update to the latest version of Photoshop - CC (2015), I've been making artifacts on the workspace each time I enable or disable guides. I can easily get rid of them by zooming in and then back out so it wasn't really a problem at first, but I can take it no longer.

  Any help would be appreciated.

  Thank you!

  

  Almost certainly associated GPU.

  What operating system?

  What are your preferences > Performance parameters?

  The driver for your video card is perfectly up to date?