El Capitan for Mac Pro 1.1?

Similar Questions

• I NEED A SOUND CARD FOR MAC PRO 3.1

  I NEED A SOUND CARD FOR MAC PRO 3.1

  For what purpose?

  Entry?

  Output?

  Maybe this will nelp

  http://eShop.MacSales.com/shop/audio/interfaces

• Where to buy the best upgrade of ram for Mac Pro end of 2013

  Where do you want to buy the best upgrade of ram for Mac Pro end 2013.  I am under creative cloud.  Thank you!

  It is a software Adobe forum... you need to find a forum for Mac hardware

• I TRY to INSTALL MY CEATIVE SUITE 2 FOR MAC PRO WITH OSX.9, I don't really know why I keep answering the same questiion

  I TRY to INSTALL MY CEATIVE SUITE 2 FOR MAC PRO WITH OSX.9, I don't really know why I keep answering the same questiion

  CS2 and MacOSX10.9 are not compatible. CS2 works on the old Mac with a PowerPC processor. Current Mac have an Intel processor and CS2 does not work.

• Graphics card for Mac Pro 3.1 update

  Hello

  I recently bought a Mac Pro 3.1 running El Capitan and desperately need a graphics card update.

  Looked at a Nvidea GE Force GTX 980 and found one on ebay. Spec as follows:

  NVIDIA GeForce GTX980 graphics controller

  Tech stuff:

  Plug motor GTX 980:

  2048CUDA carrots

  1126Base clock (MHz)

  1216Boost clock (MHz)

  144Texture fill rate (GigaTexels per second)

  Memory card GTX 980:

  7.0 clock GbpsMemory

  GBStandard 4 memory Config

  Interface GDDR5Memory

  256 - bitMemory Interface width

  224

  Display support:

  5120x3200Maximum digital resolution *.

  Resolution VGA 2048x1536Maximum

  Dual Link DVI - I, HDMI, 3 Standard display connectors x DisplayPort 1.2

  4 displaysMulti Monitor

  YesHDCP

  InternalAudio input HDMI

  Dimensions 980 GTX graphics card:

  4.376 inchesHeight

  inchesLength 10.5

  Double-widthWidth

  Couple of questions...

  1. I asked the seller if is compatible with Mac (he did not know the answer). They are compatible for both mac/pc or is there a version for each? It will work in a mac pro 3.1?

  2. do I need to provide a source of additional power for this or already installed cables will suffice?

  Thank you very much

  Yes it will work in a 3.1 based on:

  http://www.macvidcards.com/store/P42/Nvidia_GTX_980_4_GB.html

  You must 10.10.5 or later version.

  You don't need additional power but yoo must Nvidia drivers

  http://www.macvidcards.com/drivers.html

  If you do not have a card that has the firmware flashed for a Mac you will not see a splash screen, you can't use special startups like recovery, startup key Option since nothing appears on the display

  This place with flash a card PC for a Mac for $180

  http://www.macvidcards.com/store/P81/Nvidia_Flashing_Services.html

  You need to install the disks required before exchanging cards. If the existing card does not require the use of one of the connectors on the logic voard yo can likl; EU uhave two installed maps

• No WiFi after fresh El Capitan of Mac Pro 4.1 install

  I had my second hand Mac Pro 4.1 today and did a fresh install of El Capitan.

  Now I can't connect to my WiFi because there is not WiFi Interface. I already have a VRAM and resetting the SMC.

  Is it possible to get my WiFi working? Should I try a new installation of a lower version of Mac OS and then upgrade to El Capitan?

  Thanks for your help

  A wifi card?

  When I bought a used 2009 MP no wifi card has been installed.

• Resolution of the problems of El Capitan and Mac Pro GT 120?

  When El Capitan came out, I've updated my Mac Pro 4.1 which has three screens on three GT 120 s.  It was a disaster.  I need three screens and buy new maps for El Capitan is illogical.  Can someone tell me if this has been resolved now?

  Yes, the logging problem with several graphics cards has been resolved in 10.11.3 or perhaps a little earlier.

• FCPX El Capitan new Mac Pro SLOW

  I just add a new computer to our edit arsenal. It's a Mac Pro 2.7ghz - 12 CORE - 30 MB L3 cache - with 64 GB of DDR3 - 1 TB of Flash storage memory - Dual AMD over-pants D700 6 GB VRAM - essentially the full load Mac Pro.  10.2.2 FCPX running

  Why my not make happen almost instantly?  I put in back made in 0.3 seconds.  It seems to me with all this power - this thing has absolutely scream - and yet I don't see a significant difference between the calculation of my MacBook MONOCŒUR i7 with 16 GB DDR and this monster.  My MacBOOK works always - Yosemite, but my new computer came with El Capitan.  I was able to get this added to our budget by telling our Board of how long it would save.  $10,000 for a computer, it must blow my mind. It's also take about a full minute to FCPX bring up a project when I start.

  With rendered BG set this short interval of time. you have tapped on the brakes in FCP constantly. (This isn't actually rendered BG; he makes during periods of inactivity.). My suggestion would be to turn it off. With this kind of horses, you shouldn't make except for the more complex compositions. Or if you need to before export.

  If turn off made does not improve things a bit, I begin to wonder about the project - if there was something on the media - or an effect that was driving the MP to madness. Something like the reduction of the noise applied to a long clip really bind any machine in knots.

  Russ

• Unable to connect more then 2 monitors for Mac Pro end of 2013

  I was wondering if anyone had this problem and found a solution.

  The Mac pro (end 2013) model that I have would not work with 3 or more screens, little matter what I do. Even if him are all connected to separate buses. Only 2 would work at any given time. When I cut the work one, one nonfunctional lights.

  They are related:

  Computer-> Thunderbolt to HDMI-> monitor

  Computer-> Thunderbolt to HDMI-> monitor

  Computer-> monitor-> HDMI/DVI

  Setting up and connecting cable is not a problem here, because I tried a lot of different ways to connect with different types of monitors.

  Just replaced a new video card and the problem still there.

  am I missing, or hurt?

  any idea is aprisiated!

  Thank you!

  OS X El Caplitan

  10.11.6

  2.7 GHz 12-Core Intel Xeon E5

  64 GB 1866 MHz DDR3 ECC

  AMD over-pants D700 6144 MB

  Mac is unable to produce interfaces to more than two screens "legacy" levels of tension necessary to keep them from dropping out. You need an ACTIVE adapter for some of these screen to run more than two (including the interface HDMI built-in, that counts as if connect you something). poster "legacy" is other than DisplayPort and Mini DisplayPort

  Adapters ASSETS have re-drivers of signal in them, that's why they are more expensive. As long as you stay under 1920 wide, you don't ask the very expensive adapter Apple DVI Dual-Link, $ 100.

• Silent, quick config RAID for Mac Pro DAW

  I'm looking for ideas for storage configuration for my Mac Pro ' 09. This is the heart of a campus radio station / recording studio. The machine is a beast, and it serves my purposes very well. That said, the storage on board certainly needs an upgrade. Recently, I ran DriveDx to check the health of disks, and several of them are almost 30,000 hours. Right now, we lack a RAID 0 2 x WD RE3 750 GB (circa 2009) and 2 x Seagate 750Go (to 2008). Disks run without problem, but they are relatively slow and old (max ~100MB/s WD; ~75MB/s Seagate). In addition, I'm really not comfortable running a raid interlaced offshore of different styles of hard drives.

  I am looking to buy four new disks. Here's my wish list:

  Minimum of 1 TB of capacity

  Optimized RAID

  Reliable

  Quiet

  Relatively fast

  Not horribly expensive

  Does anyone have advice? I've been looking around for a while, but it has been difficult to find a good combination of these features. Or, if you have any other ideas I'm open to that as well. Thank you!

  Mac Pro 4.1

  2.26 GHz 4 x 2

  32 GB OF RAM

  3 x GeForce GT 120

  You can install one or more SSD Drives slightly faster than the 375 M bytes/s supported by the drive bays and get excellent results and not need a RAID at all.

• Commitment to Apple for Mac Pro line?

  I have a Mac Pro (early 2008), which gave me eight years of service. Good enough. I hope that press another year out of it, put my money and then upgrade to a new Mac. My (non-Apple) local service guy tried to talk to me in an iMac and pointed out that the current Mac Pro 1) is probably overkill for 99% of what I do (photography) and 2) do has not been updated by Apple since 2013. It is #2 that concerns me the most. What is the general consensus on the commitment Appleʻs to line up of range Mac Pro?

  A top of the line iMac is a very powerful computer.

  4 GHz quad core i7, 32 GB RAM, 4 GB graphics, SSD 1 TB or 3 TB Fusion by car, 5K display, a 5K or two external displays 4K, 2 ports Thunderbolt.

  The only benefits of the Mac Pro are:

  Multiple cores CPU (low speed) and a second graphics card, which will be useful if you do a lot of video rendering.

  The Thunderbolt ports more, displays more (low resolution) and a lot of simultaneous disk transfers.

  I agree that the Mac Pro is excessive.  Regarding Mac Pro upgrades, until Intel releases significantly better class server CPU and 3 stroke, it is not much Mac Pro, upgrade for Apple to do.  They do not sell enough to make small annual updates is worth.

• How to use the iMac 2010 as a target to display for mac pro 2009 with invada coda

  I want to use iMac 2010 27 inches as screen for mac book pro tour 2009 with coda of g 2 vga card invida which cable I need to use

  Video - target Display Mode - use another Mac as a screen

  Video - target Display Mode - use another Mac as a screen - Mavericks

  Video - Display Mode target: FAQ

• If I buy and install creative on my iMac cloud do that I have to buy separate serial number for Mac Pro?

  If I buy CC and download it on my iMac, I have to buy separate serial number for my Mac Pro?

  Hi Miguel,.

  Please visit the link below and the FAQ.

  Download and install Adobe Creative Cloud apps

  Vinay

• NVIDIA card for Mac Pro 2009?

  I think I have a NVIDIA card for my older Mac Pro (early 2009, 2.93 Ghz Quad-Core) in order to be able to use the Mercury playback engine first Pro.

  Can someone suggest a card appropriate for this?

  Thank you!

  DM

  dkmiles wrote:

  I think I have a NVIDIA card for my older Mac Pro (early 2009, 2.93 Ghz Quad-Core) in order to be able to use the Mercury playback engine first Pro.

  [Note: this should probably be punted the Hardware section]

  You have several choices, depending on things like budget, and if you need/expect commercial support for the card.  The least expensive and most effective option would be to go get MacVidCards on EBay.  Just look for this exact word on EBay and hunt around for its EBay page.  Dave takes on PC nVidia cards and makes them compatible with Mac Pro EFI, so that they can start successfully, view the grey Apple screen and run at full speed.  nVidia will not support that, nor will Apple and retailer of the card or the will.  But, you will have access to cards that have historically been PC only.

  On the other end of the spectrum of: grand prize and less performance, you have nVidia Mac-specific maps.  Some of them are listed here.  I would not recommend any of them, but you will get the support of the end user of any manufacturer buy you from.

• After Effects does report that 2 GB of RAM for Mac Pro AMD D700 GPU

  Using After Effects CC 12.2 on Mac Pro 2013.

  When I go to After Effects > Preferences > previews > information GPU app reports that my computer is an AMD D700 GPU for OpenGL.  It's very well, however, he also stated that the total memory is 2,00 GB, which is well below the 6 GB of VRAM, the GPU is believed to have.  Any ideas why this happens?

  The incorrect statement of the amounts of VRAM is fixed in the next update:

  http://Adobe.LY/1pFGGRE