Equivalent to Step.Limits.Low.NumericFormat in TestStand 3.1?

Similar Questions

• Step.Limits Set with ActiveX

  Hello

  I work on the development of a VI to create a TestStand sequence based on a set of inputs to an excel file.

  With LabVIEW, I was able to create a new file of sequence and insert a test "LabVIEW digital limit" in the sequence (VI attached for adding new digital step). I don't know how to take this additional numerical limits and put 'Step.Limits.Low' & 'Step.Limits.High '.

  Grateful if someone can let me know if/how this is possible.

  Thank you best regards &,.

  Don1

  PS: Please advise if I should have posted this on the set of LabVIEW.

  With the help of the reference step change for a reference of PropertyObject (Step.AsPropertyObject), then you can change the default values using the PropertyObject.SetValNumber using the search string for "Limits.Low" and "Limits.High".

• IPhone moves (steps) when low power mode

  When low power mode iPhone disables the features to save battery.

  It neutralizes movement and fitness (follow-up phase) too when low-power mode?

  Here's what it shuts down:

  IPhone low power - Apple Support Mode

• The execution of the step of the appellant in teststand

  Hello

  When an error occurs during a stage during a sequence, I can use the call of SequenceFilePostStepRuntimeError back to catch the error. But how can I go back to the step which is just triggered the error for retrying, run again? I don't want to do all the tests fail immediately, but want to come back to the stage of the appellant to have retry several times 1^st.

  Thank you very much

  WeiL

  There is an example that shows how to do exactly what you ask:

  \Examples\Callbacks\PostStepRuntimeErrorCallback\ErrorHandlerExample.SEQ

  Hope this helps,

  -Doug

• Repair in service guaranteed refused: it would really appreciate advice on how best to handle this - REPORT of STEP TEMPORARY, low wire

  
  
  

• get the number of the step in the report of teststand

  
  

  Thanks a lot.

• Change the limit step programmatically in TestStand 3.1

  Hello guys and girls.

  I got a small task for TestStand 3.1 and I don't know how to do this.

  I want to programmatically change the limit of step (multiple numerical limit test) for a step before it is executed. How can I do this? I read that someone suggested to use a step ActiveX to access limits:

  http://forums.NI.com/T5/NI-TestStand/equivalent-to-step-limits-low-NumericFormat-in-TestStand-3-1/TD...

  «TestStand 3.1 can't API calls in expressions (I think that this feature has been added in 4.0 TestStand).» You must instead use a step ActiveX. You can use an ActiveX not configured to call into PropertyObject.NumericLimit and call him on Limits.Low of the step you want to set the property. »

  I am, however, not sure how exactly to proceed since I've never used the ActiveX components in TS before.

  If anyone has the code examples (or write), I would be very grateful.

  -Kim

  As mentioned in this thread, you can certainly change the limits in your version. Read it back.

  p.s. in the future, please post to the Board TestStand and LabVIEW.

• Function expression of status

  Check step Expression > Expression of State: the following appears which resembles a function. It is a standard feature? When these functions are defined?

  CheckLimits (Step.DataSource == "Step.Result.Numeric"? Step.Result.Numeric: (Step.Result.Numeric = Evaluate (Step.DataSource)), Step.Limits.High, Step.Limits.Low, Step.Comp)

  Thank you

  JVH

  It is a standard feature. Click on any browser of expression ("f") button and search operators/functions > functions > others > check the limits

• After Expression

  I charge my limits from a text file using the shipper of the property. It updates a table of FileGlobals.

  All my tests have limits defined like this (using the tab limits):

  (1)

  Low FileGlobals.GF_TestSpec.step_0101.LimitLo

  High FileGlobals.GF_TestSpec.step_0101.LimitHi

  I use the following expression after (index expression has been simplified for this example):

  (2)

  FileGlobals.Results [0]. He'S [index] = Str (Step.Limits.Low),

  FileGlobals.Results [0]. HL [index] = Str (Step.Limits.High)

  The first ttime it works my limits are 0,0, the second time and the third etc... they are correct (27-32), as in the text file.

  I'm assuming that (1) has not held until the situation real expression is evaluated and after expression is executed before. Any ideas how to solve this problem? It is a sequence of 300 + tests, already in production. Remote access is my only option so I wouldn't rewrite it.

  Thank you

  CT

  You can change your expression of post to also evaluate expressions. Something like the following:

  FileGlobals.Results [0]. He'S [index] = Str (Evaluate (Step.Limits.LowExpr)),

  FileGlobals.Results [0]. HL [index] = Str (Evaluate (Step.Limits.HighExpr))

  It will be ok as long as there are no side effects of the evaluation of your expressions twice. If they are just specifying variables, it should be ok.

  Another idea is to load limits directly in stages, rather than in the file globals and don't not specify that the limits of expression, rather, let the load correctly loaded their values.

  Hope this helps,

  -Doug

• Expression evaluation limits step

  I'm just trying to understand the point at which the step limits expression is evaluated. I'm trying to define the limits of a test of numerical limit based on an expression. I'm passing the context of the sequence for the LabVIEW code module so that the VI may determine the limits to set the colors of parts of pass/fail indicator and for certain other purposes.

  The problem I have is that it resembles the step limits expression has not been evaluated at the time wherever the context of the sequence is passed to the VI, which means that the calculated limits are not available. Is this correct? If so, does anyone have suggestions as to how I might be able to get around this?

  Thank you.

  Adam

  Hi Adam,.

  The following graph shows the order of execution of the teststand steps.

  

  I believe that the evaluation of the expression limited on "steps of numerical limit test" occurs during the evaluation of the expression status (so the last part of the stage).

  Another solution would be to create your own custom step type and include a custom "step first substep for your personalized step step" (I think I just broke the world record for most uses of the word 'no' in a sentence )

  However, I think that you've already found the solution more practice/simple/elegant. Yes, Bravo to you!

  Thanks for your time. I hope that gives a little clarification.

  Best wishes

• get the limits of the step of a sequence in a labview program

  I am writing a labview program to access the different properties of teststand sequences to automatically enter the data of the sequence for the documentation.

  The step.limits.high property is very difficult to recover from the teststand programmatically sequence by simply using the sequence as input file.

  Does anyone know how to get the limits on a stage in a movie file?

  Thank you very much, Mr President.  I'll take here.

• Type of custom log MultiNumericLimit step

  Hi, I have developed a library using certain types of custom step. I created the type of step from the numerical limit Test Multiple standarda. In run mode the step sequence context GET and using the API of Teststand crash parameters such as:

  Step.Result.Measurement []. Data
  Step.Result.Measurement []. Limits.High
  Step.Result.Measurement []. Limits.Low

  .....

  What I can not change at run time is the name of the measure, because it depends on the line that I selected in the step type. I would change the Step.Result.Measurement [XXX]. State with Step.Result.Measurement [YYY]. Status at run time.

  I havo also another question, but it's a little more complicated to explain. The step type also has an editor that the user may open in the teststand sequence editor. In this editor, the user can select what action to take. When the user finishes the configuration press 'save' on the step step type editor should fill the pameters of the MultiNumeric limit test. Exactly the same thing when the user sets up the test from the tab in the teststand sequence editor (attached). But I can't do it.

  Thank you very much.

  Hi Logatto

  You wrote:... In this case I'm not the SequenceContext because TestStand is not running.

  You will have a SequnceContext. This is the current context of your sequence, you are editing.

  So just enter "ThisContext" Edit-in-step of your step-Type in vi.

  Now you should be able to access the Step property and make your orders.

  Please visit and note this idea for perfomance TS-User: http://forums.ni.com/t5/NI-TestStand-Idea-Exchange/Ability-to-create-user-built-in-StepTypes/idi-p/1...

  Concerning

  Jürgen

• Export multiple property of a digital test limits as an expression

  I am able to import and export the limits of the digital with expressions and several digital tests with expressions.

  What about using the charger of property for expressions within limits for multiple digital tests?

  Step.Result.Measurement [0]. Limits.LowExpr doesn't seem to work (unless I need to get one for each of the 9 several tests in my sous-suite).

  Stephen

  HM, works now.

  I had 5 multi-stage limit (0-4). Adding entries for all 5 seems to have done the trick.

  The entries are of the form: Result.Measurement [x]. Limits. [Low |] Expr-top]

  Header row:

  Result.Measurement [0]. COMP, result. Measurement [0]. Limits.Low, Result.Measurement [1]. COMP, result. Measurement [1]. Limits.Low, Result.Measurement [2]. COMP, result. Measurement [3]. COMP, result. Measurement [3]. Limits.High, Result.Measurement [3]. Limits.Low, Result.Measurement [4]. COMP, result. Measurement [4]. Limits.High, Result.Measurement [4]. Limits.Low, Result.Measurement [2]. Limits.LowExpr, Result.Measurement [2]. Limits.HighExpr, Result.Measurement [1]. Limits.High, Result.Measurement [2]. Limits.High, Result.Measurement [2]. Limits.Low, Comp, Limits.High, Limits.Low

• How to change step.result.status

  Hello

  I know just how I can configure the result step to something else state that "passed" or "failed". I know that I've done it before, but now I can't get this to work.

  Simple sequence attached file to demonstrate what I'm trying. Report as text in my machine looks like this:

  Start the sequence: MainSequence
  (Text of C:\Temp\status change test.seq)

  Pass/fail test: skipped
  Pass/fail test: failed
  TEST
  Test digital limit: failure
  Measurement: 0
  Limits:
  Low:                   9
  High: 11
  Comparison type: FROZEN (> =)<>

  Complete the sequence: MainSequence

  No reference to what we are missing?

  BR

  Petri

  Petri,

  http://zone.NI.com/reference/en-XX/help/370052K-01/tsfundamentals/infotopics/step_execution/ contains a list of action a step performs when it is executed.

  As you can see, State Expression is evaluated after the Expression. Therefore, you can not use after Expression to set the Step.Result.Status property.

  The following two options, you can try to change the status of the step:

  Option 1:

  Create the custom step type and modify state Expression.

  Option 2:

  You can use the reminder of step motor after updating the result of step

  Option 3:

  Stage results will be added to the Locals.ResultList table. Therefore, after a stage performance, you can change the result container in the table if necessary.

  -Shashidhar

• Qosmio X 770-107 - question GPU acceleration and low of the FPS game while

  Hi all

  As everyone knows (i) hope including Toshiba tech we face breakdowns of sparks/Framerate GPU limitation/Low FPS during the game, even in the game of old or new brand and down or in the highest video settings.

  So lets start with the history of the mine: I bought my Toshiba Qosmio x 770-107-3D about $2600 so I was in Qatar to the 13.04.2012... In fact since the beginning of the purchased when I am faced with this famous problem of limitation GPU... I tried a lot of things, cleaning the fan, bios and driver chart updated-decommissioning, using software overclocking, combining different versions of graphics drivers with different versions of bios drivers, also including the suggestions in this tread:

  http://forums.computers.Toshiba-Europe.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=63615

  2 days ago, I sent an email to Toshiba UK support and local support. Unfortunately I have no answer, I probably wouldn't be as usual. And I left one term of 7 months. As everyone knows; even if I sent it to Toshiba repair service, 99% they say the fault of the user or the dirty vere fans and we reflash the bios. who has no sense for us and they're going to get him back without GPU acceleration problem soving...

  In summary that I am out of options, I'm really tempted to try to solve this problem of trottling gpu...
  Maybe I should sent cell phone service and with their report of nonsense I should consider rights costumer Court in my country... will be 4 to 6 months, but in the end 90% I win.

  I am really bored and tired of playing the games lag in every 10 minutes.
  Yesterday, with and without external display, + with slot and overclocking, + video settings further down, I played Company of heroes 2 and Battlefield 2 and 4 with ventilation of the limitation and the new GPU framerate... it's totally waste of money and my time of 2 years. I want to buy alienware instead of Qosmio 2 years...

  What should I do? You really have a permanent solution for this? I await your comments.

  Win7
  BIOS v2.10
  Graphics driver v33x.x

  Kind regards.

  I read the reviews of users and customers in the thread you link above and it seems that the limitation issue was already resolved. The combination of the BIOS (v1.1?) and nVidia Driver seems to be the key.