Error encryption AES-CNS-9053.

Similar Questions

• Failure of the motorway E - there are network connectivity problems or this peer has different support encryption (AES / non - AES software)

  I have two websites and a cluster CPU as below:

  site - 1

  CUCM pub-1

  Pub 1 CUC

  imppub

  exp-c-1

  exp-e-1

  site-2

  cucm2

  CuC2

  IMP2

  exp-c-2

  exp-e-2

  !

  I do a bunch of highway E and C, but it I show error on cluster of highway E:

  Failure - there are network connectivity problems, or this peer has the support of different encryption (AES / non - AES software)

  This highway is part of a cluster, but is not the master of the configuration. Configuration changes made on this highway may be lost. More information about the Clustering help page.

  !

  What is the solution to fix it?

  Locally add cluster of highway or having to make cluster of 4 motorway between locations?

  How far are the peers of the highway on the other, what is the round trip time?  This should be within 30ms.

  Can you confirm that all highways in the cluster have the same keys option installed on all peers, as it is a requirement, call license quantities can be different, but the features option enable/disable keys must be the same.  Additionally, make sure that the version of the software installed is the same, that you have a version mismatch or could be active where encryption the other not.

  Regarding the "this highway is part of a cluster, but is not the master of the configuration... '. "this message is normal for a node that is not the master, as it is said just only make changes on the master, since all changes on the slave will be replaced by the master.

  Suggest you watch on creation of Cluster Expressway and maintenance Deployment Guide (X8.8) in case you have not yet.

• Who holds the keys for encryption AES mentioned in the table under "security and features iCloud?

  Who holds the keys for encryption AES mentioned in the table under "security and features iCloud?

  Article

  Security and privacy - Apple Support Overview iCloud

  has a useful table in the section entitled Security and features iCloud.

  The table shows the types of keys used to secure the different types of data.

  Apple holds these keys as it may be requested of Apple by third parties?

  Hmmm... You definitely raise a good and valid question to which I don't know the answer to, but if I had to guess, I would say that no one.  Would this be possible?  I know I've heard Cook mention that they "don't hold the keys" but does the same thing, it refers?  It would make a very interesting topic of discussion.

• Support encryption (AES-CCMP) WPA-2 on AIR-AP1230B-A-K9 security

  Hello

  I have access points model AIR-AP1230B-A-K9 with IOS - c1200-k9w7 - tar.122 - 13.JA4

  Pls confirm if he takes in charge the encryption (AES-CCMP) WPA-2 security or IOS must be upgraded.

  What IOS must be upgraded?

  Kind regards

  Kern

  Who have a 802.11 radio access point g should support AES.  According to the part number you gave this AP has a 802. 11 b radio except if it has been upgraded.  This radio will not support AES encryption.

• OpenPGP error; Encryption/signing failed; Send an unencrypted message? I get this after the upgrade to the latest version of last night. Can you help me?

  Last night, I've upgraded to the new version of Thunderbird 31. When I try to send a signed message, I get the error written in the subject line and my message arrives without the electronic signature.
  Can you help me with this problem that I didn't have before the upgrade?
  Thank you
  Cecilia

  I can not even sign my emails.

  So do you mean that you try just to send a signed message, not so much, encrypted and signed?

  You are prompted to enter the password for your private key when sending a signed message. You get the password prompt at all?

  What is your version of Enigmail?

  The version available on AMO is still 1.6, but the latest version of Enigmail is 1.7, still waiting for review on AMO. Version 1.6 does not work with TB 31, so if you have not 1.7 yet, you can try this.
  https://addons.Mozilla.org/en-us/Thunderbird/addon/Enigmail/versions/

• Encryption AES/ECB/PKCS7Padding

  Dear developers

  I am converting an application from Android native BlackBerry 10. The application uses AES to encrypt the data. So I went looking for how to do in BlackBerry 10 but it seems not as simple as that. In Java, it looks like this:

  Byte [] arrayOfByte1 = HexToByte (key);
  Byte [] arrayOfByte2 = data.getBytes ("UTF8");

  SecretKeySpec localSecretKeySpec = new SecretKeySpec (arrayOfByte1, "AES");

  LocalCipher cipher = Cipher.getInstance("AES/ECB/PKCS7Padding");
  localCipher.init (1, localSecretKeySpec);

  Var str As String = Base64.encodeBytes (localCipher.doFinal (arrayOfByte2));

  But how can I easily achieve in 10 BlackBerry? I already tried with the download of this example:

  https://www.dropbox.com/s/czxmuhgzd8ak1zz/AesAlgoSample.zip

  But how to add padding to it? Encryption thing a little hard on BB10...

  https://twitter.com/robbieDubya of BlackBerry has created a nice AESCryptoDemo for waterfalls. I could follow through it and extract pieces I used in a Python application to operate the AES encryption. It includes pad/unpad routines. Should be all you need.

  https://github.com/BlackBerry/Cascades-community-samples/tree/master/AESCryptoDemo

• Produce pages with required checksum error: encryption function 'SH512' is not supported on this system

  Hello

  I encounter errors in an application of apex.oracle.com was exported to another environment.

  My target environment is:

  Apex 5.0.0.00.31

  Database 11.2.0.4

  Error page displays:

  The encryption function 'SH512' is not supported on this system.

  Contact your administrator for the application.

  • is_internal_error: true
  • apex_error_code: WWV_FLOW_CRYPTO. UNSUPPORTED_FUNCTION
  • Component.type: APEX_APPLICATION_BUTTONS
  • Component.ID: 8787606655825740717
  • Component.Name: COPY
  • error_backtrace: - PL/SQL call stack - line object handle number name of the object 0x1d785dc58 641

  package APEX_050000.WWV_FLOW_ERROR 709 0x1d785dc58 body

  package APEX_050000.WWV_FLOW_ERROR 0x1d785dc58 1013 body

  package APEX_050000.WWV_FLOW_ERROR 0x1cde954b0 328 bodies

  package APEX_050000.WWV_FLOW_CRYPTO 0x1ddf7b498 1506 body

  package APEX_050000.WWV_FLOW_SECURITY 0x16f574d40 9657 body

  package APEX_050000.WWV_FLOW_UTILITIES 0x1d7fa7ed8 370 body

  package APEX_050000.WWV_FLOW_BUTTON 0x1ed9fe680 2288 body

  package APEX_050000.WWV_FLOW 0x1ed9fe680 2351 body

  package APEX_050000.WWV_FLOW 0x1d71535d8 1720 body

  package APEX_050000.WWV_FLOW_DISP_PAGE_PLUGS 0x1d71535d8 972 body

  package APEX_050000.WWV_FLOW_DISP_PAGE_PLUGS 0x17bf9b618 2221 body

  package APEX_050000.WWV_FLOW_PAGE 0x17bf9b618 2447 body

  package APEX_050000.WWV_FLOW_PAGE 0x1ed9fe680 4938 body

  package APEX_050000.WWV_FLOW 0x1d79de248 173 body

  procedure APEX_050000.F 0x1d77eeb10 33 anonymous block

  This seems to be related to the buttons on the page that redirects to pages that have the value Arguments Page Access Protection must have Checksum.  If I hide buttons, or change the page on the target pages access protection Unrestricted page works fine.

  Bug in Apex 5?

  Hi 1043414,

  APEX 5 works on 12 c, where SH512 is supported. Default APEX uses the most secure algorithm on the platform where you develop. If you need to copy the app to 11g, please make sure that the checksum algorithm is supported on this platform. Go for the shared components > security attributes and click the Bookmarks button expire, where you can change the algorithm.

  Kind regards

  Christian

• Microsoft L2TP over IPSEC client with AES encryption

  I configured L2TP over IPSec Cisco VPN router with Hastings 3des encryption is sha1 with diffie hellman Group 2 and I can't connect with success of Microsoft customers.

  but my question is why can I not connect when I am increasing the encryption with AES 256 and sha256 DH group 14, his looks that windows does not support advanced encryption.

  is it possiple to activate encryption aes with the highest level...? and how?.

  Hello

  To ensure that you get the best response to your concerns, we suggest that publish this request via the Web to Microsoft Developer network site. To do this, visit this link.

  Best regards.

• Site to site errors

  Thanks for any help... our internet connection has been moved to a new IP address by the provider and I can't seem to get our vpn site-to-site to the top.  I keep getting the following debug version my ASA.

  Mar 04 22:35:23 [IKEv1] IP = 207.177.XX, connection landed on tunnel_group 207.177.XX
  Mar 04 22:35:23 [IKEv1] group = 207.177.XXX, IP = 207.177.XX, PHASE 1 COMPLETED
  Mar 04 22:35:23 [IKEv1] group = 207.177.XX, IP = 207.177.XX, IPSec security association proposals found unacceptable.
  Mar 04 22:35:23 [IKEv1] group = 207.177.XX, IP = 207.177.XX, error QM WSF (P2 struct & 0x00007fff2f5844c0, mess id 0xceaeff).
  Mar 04 22:35:23 [IKEv1] group = 207.177.XX, IP = 207.177.XX, Removing counterpart of correlator table failed, no match!
  Mar 04 22:35:23 [IKEv1] group = 207.177.XX, IP = 207.177.XX, Session is be demolished. Reason: Phase 2
  Mar 04 22:35:24 [IKEv1] IP = 207.177.XXX, encrypted packet received with any HIS correspondent, drop

  My relevant configs is below my ASA and cisco 891W

  ASA

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------

   ASA Version 8.6(1)2 

  
  

   access-list outside_cryptomap extended permit ip 10.40.0.0 255.255.0.0 object-group DM_INLINE_NETWORK_1 access-list outside_cryptomap_2 extended permit ip any object XXX-range 

   nat (inside,outside) source static any any destination static obj-10.40.224.0 obj-10.40.224.0 route-lookup nat (inside,any) source static XXX_TO_NOC XXX_TO_NOC destination static NOC2 NOC2 nat (inside,any) source static XXX_TO_NOC XXX_TO_NOC destination static NOC1 NOC1

   route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 71.6.XXX 1 route inside net_10_0_0_0-8 255.0.0.0 10.40.0.9 1 route inside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.40.0.9 tunneled

   crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA esp-aes-256 esp-sha-hmac crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set TRANS_ESP_3DES_SHA esp-3des esp-sha-hmac crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set TRANS_ESP_3DES_SHA mode transport crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA esp-aes esp-sha-hmac crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-128-MD5 esp-aes esp-md5-hmac crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-192-SHA esp-aes-192 esp-sha-hmac crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-192-MD5 esp-aes-192 esp-md5-hmac crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-256-MD5 esp-aes-256 esp-md5-hmac crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA esp-3des esp-sha-hmac crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5 esp-3des esp-md5-hmac crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-DES-SHA esp-des esp-sha-hmac crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set ESP-DES-MD5 esp-des esp-md5-hmac crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set esp-des esp-3des esp-md5-hmac crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set test esp-aes esp-sha-hmac crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set test mode transport crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set XXX esp-aes-256 esp-md5-hmac crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set XXX mode transport

   crypto ipsec security-association lifetime seconds 3600 crypto ipsec security-association replay window-size 128 crypto ipsec df-bit clear-df inside crypto dynamic-map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 set pfs group1 crypto dynamic-map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 set ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA crypto dynamic-map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 set reverse-route crypto map outside_map 1 match address outside_cryptomap_2 crypto map outside_map 1 set pfs group1 crypto map outside_map 1 set peer 207.XXX crypto map outside_map 1 set ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA ESP-AES-128-MD5 ESP-AES-192-SHA ESP-AES-192-MD5 ESP-AES-256-SHA ESP-AES-256-MD5 ESP-3DES-SHA ESP-3DES-MD5 ESP-DES-SHA ESP-DES-MD5 hollister crypto map outside_map 5 match address outside_cryptomap crypto map outside_map 5 set pfs crypto map outside_map 5 set peer 204.XXX crypto map outside_map 5 set ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA ESP-AES-128-SHA crypto map outside_map 65535 ipsec-isakmp dynamic SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP crypto map outside_map interface outside

   crypto isakmp nat-traversal 21

   crypto ikev1 enable outside crypto ikev1 ipsec-over-tcp port 10000 crypto ikev1 policy 1 authentication pre-share encryption aes hash sha group 2 lifetime 86400 crypto ikev1 policy 2 authentication pre-share encryption 3des hash sha group 2 lifetime 86400 crypto ikev1 policy 50 authentication pre-share encryption aes-256 hash sha group 2 lifetime 86400

  ROUTER

  ------------------------------------------------------------

  crypto ISAKMP policy 20
  BA aes
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  ISAKMP crypto key address XX 71.le XX
  !
  !
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac vpn_trans
  transport mode
  !
  vpn_map 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map
  defined by peer 71.le XX
  Set security-association second life 43200
  Set transform-set vpn_trans
  match address 101

  interface GigabitEthernet0
  Description $OUTSIDE$
  bandwidth 4000
  IP address 207.le 255.255.255.0 XXX
  penetration of the IP stream
  NAT outside IP
  IP virtual-reassembly
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  vpn_map card crypto

  overload of IP nat inside source list 102 interface GigabitEthernet0
  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 207.le XXX

  Note access-list 1 INSIDE_IF = Vlan1
  Note category of access list 1 = 2 CCP_ACL
  access-list 1 permit 10.112.10.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 101 permit ip 10.112.10.0 0.0.0.255 10.11.0.0 0.0.255.255
  access-list 101 permit ip 10.112.10.0 0.0.0.255 10.40.0.0 0.0.255.255
  access-list 101 permit ip 10.112.10.0 0.0.0.255 10.50.0.0 0.0.255.255
  access-list 101 permit ip 10.112.10.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
  access-list 102 deny ip 10.112.10.0 0.0.0.255 10.11.0.0 0.0.255.255
  access-list 102 deny ip 10.112.10.0 0.0.0.255 10.40.0.0 0.0.255.255
  access-list 102 deny ip 10.112.10.0 0.0.0.255 10.50.0.0 0.0.255.255
  access-list 102 deny ip 10.112.10.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
  access-list 102 permit ip 10.112.10.0 0.0.0.255 any

  debugging is not very useful, except I think about the ASA that the IP in the ID_IPV4_SUBNET ID message received initially is to form 10.112.10.0/24, but a few lines more far in the negotiation of phase 1/2 the ASA sees the address as 10.0.0.0/8 ID_IPV4_SUBNET ID that is not correct

  also in debugging on the SAA traffic from the 10.112.10.0 network does not control card crypto for acl seq 1 or 5... I think that this traffic should be hitting seq1

  Thank you!

  Hello

  Your router config seems functional but your ASA tunnel config nat-exemption is messed up and here is the fix.

  Step 1:
  object-group network My-router-lan
  object-network 10.112.10.0 255.255.255.0

  Step 2:
  object-group network My-local-lan
  network-object 10.11.0.0 0.0.255.255
  network-object 10.40.0.0 0.0.255.255
  network-object 10.50.0.0 0.0.255.255
  object-network 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255

  Step 3:
  outside_cryptomap_2 list extended access permitted ip object-group group-object-My-local-lan my lan router

  Step 4:
  no access list outside_cryptomap_2 extended permit ip any object XXX-range

  Step 5:
  NAT (inside, all) static source My My-local-lan-lan-local static destination My-router-lan my lan router

  Step 6:

  Route 10.112.10.0 255.255.255.0 71.xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx

  71.xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx = equal to the default route pointing to the address of the ISP on your ASA.

  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

  If these nats associated tunnel going to the router, remove them as well.

  NAT (inside, outside) static source any any destination static obj - 10.40.224.0 obj - 10.40.224.0 - route search
  destination NAT (inside, all) static source XXX_TO_NOC XXX_TO_NOC NOC2 NOC2 static
  destination NAT (inside, everything) XXX_TO_NOC XXX_TO_NOC NOC1 NOC1 static static source

  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

  Let me know, if this can help.

  Thank you

  Rizwan James

• VPN error of phase 2 - IPSEC (ipsec_process_proposal): invalid local address

  people

  I have two 1941 routers running 15.2 and I'm trying to implement a vpn site-to site with digital signatures

  I can come up with a proposal of phase 2 (phase 1 happens to qm_idle), but the proposal for phase 2 is rejected with the error message above

  does anyone have any good sample configs site to another using 15.2 VPN

  my config is less than

  his mirror on the remote end

  can a nyone help out me?

  !
  crypto ISAKMP policy 10
  BA aes
  Group 5
  life 82800
  !
  !
  Crypto ipsec transform-set T-TRANSFORM aes - esp esp-sha-hmac
  tunnel mode
  !
  Crypto ipsec profile T PROFILE
  game of transformation-TRANSFORMATION T
  PFS Set group5
  !

  Hello

  Can you check on your area of encryption... I mean your local LAN subnet that you used for the site to the site...

  Here is the same example from site to site

  http://www.firewall.CX/Cisco-technical-Knowledgebase/Cisco-routers/867-c...

  Also, you can view the example configuration here...

  hostname RTR1

  !

  proposal of crypto ikev2 AES256-192-128-PROPOSAL

  encryption aes-cbc-256 aes-cbc-192 aes-cbc-128

  the sha1 integrity

  Group 2

  !

  Crypto ikev2 IKEv2-policy

  AES256-192-128 proposal

  !

  ikev2 crypto VPN KEYS keychains

  peer ASA1

  address 10.0.0.2

  pre-shared-key local MyKey1

  pre-shared-key remote MyKey1

  !

  !

  !

  Profile of crypto ikev2 ASA1

  match one address 10.0.0.2 remote identity 255.255.255.255

  address local identity 10.0.0.1

  sharing front of remote authentication

  sharing of local meadow of authentication

  door-key local VPN-KEYS

  !

  !

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES256-SHA esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac

  tunnel mode

  !

  !

  !

  map RTR1 ASA1 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto

  defined peer 10.0.0.2

  game of transformation-ESP-AES256-SHA

  Define ASA1 ikev2-profile

  match address VPN-TRAFFIC

  !

  !

  !

  !

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/0

  the IP 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.252

  automatic speed

  automatic duplex

  card crypto RTR1 ASA1

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/1

  192.168.5.1 IP address 255.255.255.0

  automatic speed

  automatic duplex

  !

  IP route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.2

  !

  VPN-TRAFFIC extended IP access list

  ip licensing 192.168.5.0 0.0.0.255

  Concerning

  Knockaert

• Error in MAP using PLINK.exe and PSCP.exe

  Working on a script in PowerCLI which allows me to audit security and re-concile ESXi from the security settings for all our guests. For the ESXi 'Message of the day' host, I check to see if the file ' / etc/issue "is filled with the warning banner I want and if it is not, copy the correct file. The problem is one of our environments has 20 + ESXi hosts on the same subnet. For some reason, some of the guests become ' pam_sm_authenticate: failed [error code: 40017] "and access denied when I try to run PSCP.exe and PLINK.exe. Firewalls between hosts and my script box is clean and its looks like the connection is made.  Anyone have an idea on why some hosts the same generation, config, FW rules and subnet would work for some but not others?

  -ESXi Var\log\auth error - "pam_sm_authenticate: failed [error code: 40017]."

  -Error PowerCLI\PowerShell;

  Connect to % IP % port 22 host

  Server version: SSH - 2.0 - OpenSSH_6.6.1

  Using the SSH version 2 Protocol

  We pretend that version: SSH - 2.0 - PuTTY_Release_0.61

  Diffie-Hellman group Exchange

  Make the exchange of keys Diffie-Hellman with SHA-256 hash

  Footprint of the host key is:

  SSH - rsa 2048 RSA KEY % %

  Detected-> server encryption AES-256 SDCTR customer

  Detected-> MAC Server algorithm HMAC-SHA1 customer

  Initialized AES-256 SDCTR Server-> client encryption

  HMAC-SHA1 Server detected-> client MAC algorithm

  Using the user name "root".

  ******************************************************************

  Message from the WARNING message % day\Banner %

  ******************************************************************

  Access denied

  Access denied

  Access denied

  Access denied

  Access denied

  Access denied

  Access denied

  Access denied

  Access denied

  Access denied

  Received disconnect message (Protocol error)

  Disconnect message text: too many failures for root authentication

  Server disconnect message has

  Type 2 (Protocol error):

  "Too many failures for root authentication."

  * PLINK and PSCP is part of the PuTTY application group. PLINK is to run the CLI and PSCP commands remotely, is to copy the files via SCP.

  Yes, all nodes have been running the same version.

  It seems that this could be a problem with the same or agents. We noticed while speaking with the support that only systems which were related to the area were affected. It turns out that if separate you them from the field and then stop the Service Active Directory, it will suddenly start working. Support is always trying to figure our why, as the error only we were what I mentioned in the previous announcement.

  LucD thanks for the reply.

• Error to migrate

  Hello

  I have problem during vm migration. I have 10 host (5 HP ProLiant BL460c G6 and 5 HP ProLiant BL460c G7) in a cluster, with evc disable.

  The virtual machine I want to migrate is host HP G7 and want to move to host HP G6. Here is the screenshot.

  How to solve this problem. Need your suggestion

  You have a cluster where VCA (Enhanced vMotion compatibility) is activated? Judging by the error I think that this is not the case, and the source and target host (too) differs with respect to the architecture of the processor. The architecture of the CPU on the HP G6 may not support things like encryption AES of CPU. There are 2 ways to solve this problem in the present case and the future:

  (1) allow your cluster to use CVS, this may mean stop the virtual machine in a maintenance window. This will create a common basis of CPU between all guests and features leather as the VM AES encryption, making it compatible for migration between all hosts in the cluster.

  (2) to cold of the virtual machine migration (stop it).

  Hope this helps,

• Error 1079 for three services.

  After you apply the updates, I can't start my exchange server because several services do not start now. One being the workstation service. I tried to change the connection to the local service, which had no effect; two other services do not start Windows 2008 R2 system with the same error, encryption services and awareness of location services both also not begin with error 1079. Since the updates, my ad exchange topology is also unable to start... I'm so tired!  We have Exchange 2013 load.

  Hello

  Please post your question in Server TechNet Forums.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/WindowsServer/en-us/home?category=WindowsServer

  See you soon.

• Encrypted L3 Communications between the TOWER and WLC?

  Hi all

  I work with a client who wants to put the towers away to their WLC (a 4402). The problem is that communications between the TOWER and WLC must be secured, even through their private Wan! I have a few questions that result, if someone is able to help you;

  1. I can't know if and what method of encryption is (is it AES etc.?) used on connections between towers and the WLC and what are the steps?
     1. The terminology can be a problem here, it's not a wireless mesh, just classic LAP for WLC
  2. EXTENSIVE customer network is already encrypted (IPSec VPN via VPLS) in parts - what is the consequence of execution of AP<-->WLC with end to end (if possible) on a network encryption EXTENDED with IPSec, i.e. double encryption?

  Strange but true - pointers will be greatly appreciated... Phil.C

  With a controller of the 4400 series, the control traffic between the AP and the regulator is already encrypted AES.  The user traffic is not encrypted.  If you use a 5508 controller all traffic between the AP and the controller is encrypted AES.

  For what is running the traffic through a VPN, it should work.  The issue I see with this is with the MTU in general.  The controller will drop all packets with a payload of less than 32bytes data.  According to the MTU over the VPN I've seen packets getting fragmented and it is a question.  If you use one of the versions CAPWAP (5.2 or newer) discovery dynamic MTU is part of the Protocol and this MTU problem does not really exist.

• 2821 software - AES 256

  Hello

  I'm trying to determine if this router is the AES 256 encryption.

  CISCO2821-HSEC/K9 2821 Bundle w/AIM-VPN/SSL-2, Adv. IP Serv, SSL 10 S28NAISK9 - 12409T Cisco 2800 ADVANCED IP SERVICES 1

  AIM-VPN/SSL-2 a / 3DES / AES / SSL VPN encryption/Compression 1

  Since the Locator functionality of software that I can't determine the level of AES only making AES, can anyone help.

  John,

  AES is part of the Ipsec standard, IOS Ipsec support K9 image should have AES that automatically supports encryption of bit 128,192,256 algorithm.

  To veryfy on router simply do:

  Router (config) #crypto isakmp policy 1

  Router (config-isakmp) #encryption aes?

  Here is a link, it is you want to play as a reference.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Partner/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094203.shtml#intro

  Rgds

  -Jorge