Except for the color change of the Web of gifs

Similar Questions

• Yosemite and cursor hand PS (except for the web)

  Execution of Yosemite and and PS 2014.2.1.

  Noticed since the upgrade that, in save for Web, check box (after you define settings and click Save... slider often switches of typical mouse handmade arrow and it won't switch back.)

  To select parts of the file name of the difficult area.

  -Kevin

  For me it is not a simple... it's Apple's fault.  It is also not a simple it is the fault of the Abobe.

  Yes, it is a problem within the Apple OS except the dialog box.

  However, this problem occurs only in Photoshop.

  In my view, there is an interaction between the two, causing the bug in the dialog of Apple.

  I also believe that this issue must first be brought to Adobe engineers to identify the problem and work with Apple to correct.  Who knows, maybe it's something in Photoshop being the cause of the bug appearing in the oOS dialog box.

  To be told by an Adobe employee to simply say that Apple is incredibly short sided.   I wish the employee to work with me and might be able to return this report to the Adobe engineers for the glance and to contact Apple.

  We know that in the past, Adobe has been able to work with Apple in a way where a normal person like me can not.

  -Kevin

• Hi, I need to remove the white background in a file HAVE and the usual way (except for the web/PNG) does not work. I'm on the latest version of AI. Thanks in advance

  A

  Attached is my file

  Thanks to you all. My designer solved the problem. The image was white in the file that made it impossible to make it transparent.

• Color changes during the recording of the PSD to JPEG (safe for the web) in PS CS5 working in sRGB

  As I secured it for the web a PSD file, jpeg version of the same file changes slightly color - I opened the two files in PS CS5 to compare.

  File initially processed in Lightroom 6 and converted to sRGB for export.

  I worked in the sRGB color space in Photoshop.

  When exporting I secured for the web. I tried both options checked including the color profile and convert to sRGB.

  I tried to save to the web as a PNG and color remained the same, she only moves for JPEG files.

  You can't really see the difference in color with a naked eye, but be specific. I don't understand why he would change when I work in the color space is sRBG. Please help this is driving me crazy!

  JPEG compression can change the values, even quite spectacular on single pixel level. You have the selector of color set to "sample point"?

• What is the disadvantage of savings WITHOUT color profile for the web?

  I have discussed this issue in another thread and a clear argument against saving jpg files * without * a color profile must be performed.

  I'm very annoyed with how much more red and saturated, all my jpg files appear in IE (which does not read the sRGB embedded profile) compared to FF (which is the case).

  I tried to save the image even with the inclusion of unchecked color profile, and of course, IE and FF are showing the same image.

  It seems to me that including color profiles with jpg are just an invitation for different browsers interpret the image differently.

  Why not just save them all, WITHOUT color profiles?

  The downside to this, what exactly?

  mjyeager wrote:

  Emil, please do not confuse what follows for stubbornness...

  No worries, I never had such thoughts

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... IE does not read color profiles. The fact of FF. ERGO, in situations where a color profile is involved, the JPG will be different in each browser.

  True, without color managed programs and management the colors may not display an image in the same way. Except in the situation where the color profile describing the color of the image or the color values of an image without a color profile, by an extraordinary chance match the display capabilities of color of the device used by the program managed without colors.

  One of the problems that the addresses of color management is that all monitors will display the same color differently. Color management will make colors appear the same or as close as possible.

  A color managed program will send the RGB values of the color of the video card corrected to compensate for the differences between how your monitor displays color values and how they are perceived.

  For example, to help my Monitor wide gamut, when I create an image in Photoshop, with a red color pure R = 255, G = 0 and B = 0 and then do a screen capture, I can check how Photoshop sends these values to the video card. The result is R = 222, G = 65, B = 0 when I'm simulating an ideal sRGB display. So I can see how my colors appear on the screens of ideal sRGB. However, in reality, it is very likely to have a monitor displaying space sRGB color ideal without a color management, so to complete the color management chain, the other monitors that display my image must also have the appropriate color management to compensate for the differences in screen and display correctly RGB numbers representing the color that I see on my screen.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... However, if the JPG has no color profile, image shows exactly the same way in both browsers...

  Who will most likely be a bad smell, which means not repoducing the expected color which is always the case with the browsers managed without colors.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... Now, let's say this image - which looks the same in both browsers - is too hot. I can load it in Photoshop, change its hue and re-save is more what I'm looking for. The resulting image will then out - in the two browsers identically - the way I want to...

  Yes, the image will be the same in both browsers on your and any other monitor but the colors that you create (edit) will examine the way which only see you them on your monitor.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... Now, what I think you are trying to do, is that I have no control on what are the conditions of viewing on the OTHER end (i.e., visitors to the site). They could range wide monitors, cheaper monitors, running MAC or PC, etc...

  I don't remember talking about this earlier, but yes, it's true.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... It's true. I have no control over that. However, how including the color profile sRGB with the JPG would give me more control over these things I would not include? Unless you had to tell me that browsers arbitrarily apply a random color profile when in the absence of one, I am simply not understand how including the color with the JPG profile performs one another act that ensure that the picture is completely different in FF it does in Internet Explorer.

  You who are absolutely wrong. Color management is not to have any control over how other devices are setup, calibrated, etc.. As I said earlier make sure you communicate the colors scheduled correctly or as close as possible, as long as you and the destination use the proper color management. This means that the embedded profile FF will display correctly the planned colors while IE will not. If you do not include a color profile with your image both FF and IE will not display correctly the planned colors but they will be equal in that.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... I understand the need for color profiles to print. In fact, my printer insists on the details when it comes to color profiles.

  But for the web? I'm still not understand where the downside is to omit the color profile. It's not like the browsers get CONFUSED when it is not included. Or that the colors will start randomly from refreshing one page to another.

  I am really trying to understand what you are saying here, but still haven't.

  In addition to what Marian said:

  If you create the colors using an sRGB display ideal (given the color management on your system works properly, it can be simulated by color of Photoshop on your range management widescreen when you assign the profile sRGB color to the image) and then on any ideal sRGB display, it will look the same you see on your screen regardless if it's with or without embedded sRGB color profile. However, in reality, it is unlikely to have a monitor, sRGB, display of the ideal space of sRGB color without color management. Now what does this mean in practice? Assume that users interested in, using the IE managed without colors on a PC with the Windows default color management. In other words, color management programs are told by the system monitor displays the ideal sRGB space, which is very likely to be the truth. Then users with this configuration with sRGB monitors will not see a difference between IE and FF when viewing your image with or without sRGB profile, the colors are not very likely to be the same that you see on the screen, but with the difference that is more likely to be accepted depending on how close to the ideal color space sRGB these monitors are. If some of these users with this configuration have wide range monitors, then the image will always be the same with or without sRGB profile, but with a very unacceptable difference of how you see it on your space to sRGB sumulated - strongly supersaturated.

  For users that have the color correctly managed systems, when the image is saved with a sRGB profile, it appears color managed programs such as FF the same or as close as possible to the way in which you can see on your monitor. Programs run without colors the case remains the same as that described above.

  A little history on how standard sRGB was created. It is a standard, including more things, but above all defining an abstract color space. It was created sometime after that the market was already flooded with computer monitors, and the creation of ideal sRGB color space was based on an average PC monitor display capabilities over time. After that the manufacturers used this standard sRGB as a target to create monitors.

  UN-color of programs run on PC have been created and tested using sRGB monitors so that they can't be considered reliable for showing intended to display colors if the images they use have been created using an sRGB they will be in the stadium of this range of sRGB.

• How can I change my mood Message in Skype for the Web?

  How can I change my mood message in Skype for the Web?

  People of good news: you can now change your mood message in Skype for the Web

  Just click on the picture at the top left of your profile, and then click the small icon of pencil next to the message of change in activity.

• Except for the size of the Web file not updaing

  I am trying to record on a chart for the web, and I noticed that the small file size indicating number is not updated... changing something?

  OS X, Mac Pro, GM 16 RAM Yosemite, 10.10.2 CS6

  Thank you!

  It should work. Maybe he needs to reset.

  Opening registration for the Web, press the Option key on your Mac, Cancel to Reset button changes. Click on it and it should make it clear to the default values.

  Alternate: Photoshop preferences Reset: hold cmd-opt-shift, start Photoshop and click Yes when the dialog box "Remove Photoshop settings file" appears.

• Best way to prepare images ProPhoto RGB for the Web?

  My working to Edit my RAW files color space is ProPhoto RGB. My master files are saved as ProPhoto RGB 16 bit layered PSD files. I am aware of the many ways to prepare my images for the Web, but it is better to properly view my work on a web site?

  
  

  «Save for Web...» "of Photoshop is easy, but it's also good work like resize manually,"Convert to Profile"(sRGB), then" save under... ". "an 8-bit JPEG? I noticed "Save for Web...» "its color space designated as"Untagged RGB", while the manual method is"sRGB"will create a file w. Any difference? Thank you.
  

  Were you not satisfied by the answers you got this question on Luminous Landscape forum? I will repost mine here:

  ---

  You should always incorporate the profile. With the notable exception of Internet Explorer (which seems to be a lost cause), most browsers now manage well of color management. At least Safari and Firefox both do.

  Save for Web in Photoshop always band profile with default settings, you will need to check the "embed color profile". This setting sticks. Personally, I think it's well past time to change this default, but that's it.

  While you're there, check "Convert to sRGB" and set to "use the embedded profile. This shows you the image with full color management (using the monitor profile to display). Here still SFW uses an obsolete default from the old days, when browsers were not color management.

  If you use a range wide screen a few special considerations come in and in Firefox, a manual adjustment has be activated (color management mode 1) *.

  Regarding resizing, I have no particular opinion. SFW seems to do well. But you should do a final sharpening after resizing, that needs to be done in Photoshop anyway, so he can probably handle resizing too. Construction while some actions and you are ready.

  Firefox users should enable this setting in all cases, regardless of monitor they use. What it does is assign sRGB to any untagged material. This allows full color management chain, instead of just go directly to the screen unmanaged. IOW, even color management on hardware untagged, so long as it is created in sRGB with sRGB numbers.

• Several pages for the web?

  Hello. I am very new to InDesign, and I'm using CS5. I'm working on a flyer for an upcoming event. I do a page of printing, legal size and have just completed, using Kuler colors in CMYK mode, and everything seems good.

  I also wanted to do a separate document, so I put it on a web page.

  I did a file... New... document, intended for the web, it size in 1024 x 768 and used Kuler colors in RGB. When I was building the document, needed me more space than just a page. So I added a page to fit all the info, photos, etc., and I ended up with two full pages of my document. Here's what I don't understand...

  I do not how to put the document 2 page on my web page. It doesn't look like two separate pages like that now? Should I make a long page so that I can scrool just down the document as on an ordinary web page? I checked the size of my "legal book" size paper by changing the ruler from inches to pixels guides and came to 610 wide x 1010 long. Do I just do the size of my document online?

  Thanks for the help.

  Just use the page tool to extend your first page down and put your additional info on the bottom.

  Here's the thing, however, that "for the web" is not intended to do, it's for publications that are... heck who knows what it's for!  The normal method is just to export your first print version of smaller file size and post in downloadable PDF format.  Or if you want a web page uses another tool, not Indesign.  I would like to start by talking to the person who organizes or assembles the web page you're going to be showing on and asking them what they would recommend in your case.

• Prep file InDesign for the web.

  PSCS5, Mac OS 10.6.4

  I need to prepare a book cover created in InDesign display with online sellers (Angus & Roberton, Austraila, and Amazon for beginners). My first attempt and prepare the InD file for the web has failed. No file is available from each provider. Can you help me?

  The InD file is 8 "x 8", contains 2 images, 2 vectors of I and PS text. " PS files are set at 350 dpi (by record the print service bureau). The book is intended for the wet press 4 colours. The first set of wet proofs are superb, so I know I'm on the right track with color, related, etc. images management.

  My first approach when I tried it prepare for the web was to export the InD file in a JPEG file, open it in PS and save it as a .psd file before making any changes. After you convert the color in RGB, I resize to 3 "x 3" at 72 dpi, then saved as a JPEG file with a new name. "  I think that the resizing and resolutoion is where I was wrong. But I am at a loss for the right way forward and what parameters to use for the image size and resolution.

  What is the procedure I should I have followed to prepare the cover over a picture for the web? Here is the image exported in JPEG format at 150 dpi.

  Thanks in advance.

  Toni

  

  Toni...

  I'm doing print and web and often take a page ID to an image.

  What I do...

  1. Export Indesign to PDF. (Use any standard PDF job option you have, same PDFX1a)
  2. Drag the PDF Photoshop > open 300 PPI and no matter what the dimensions are already present.
  3. If necessary, crop and flatten the image in Photoshop. (PDFx1a will be cropped and flattening will offset any transparency in the PDF file.)
  4. In Photoshop > file > save for Web > dimensions of the input image I need in the box dialog SFW
  5. Click Save.

  What's been sent by others is correct. There is no PPP/DPI for the web. The only thing that matters is the width and height. If you want you can test to show you. Create 2 images - one to 100 x 100 pixels and 300ppi and the other to 100 x 100 pixels and 72 dpi. Save the two images for the web, and then open the pictures stored in a browser... they are the same size and look identical.

  Export to PDF from ID, you get a crisp, clean the PDF.

  By dragging the PDF to PS, you get a purified PS image. If you export a jpg of ID and then save a jpg of PS that you create artifacts due to the re-registration of a compressed format (jpg).

  Using save for Web to create the final image all the superfluous image data are robbed and you get a basic, clean and crisp image to the size entry in the SFW.

  There are other roads, you can take, but for me this five-step process gives the best results in all cases.

• Data for the Web service control

  Hello

  I have jdeveloepr User 12.1.3, I WSDL soap, I create the data control for the web service from the WSDL, the problem is when creating data controls the separate parameter that the method, for example, below it is the method that I call the setNotificationAction name and the parameter IN (P_ACTION, P_NOT_ID, P_PASSWORD_ERP, P_TOKEN (, P_USER_ID P_USER_ID_ERP), as below, why the separate parameter that the method?

  Note that I try the binding WSDL SOAP UI and its ok and works as expected.

  

  Resolved by changing the typesList.add (Object.class) at typesList.add (GenericType.class)

• What is the best export for the web?

  What is considered the best export from Adobe Illustrator CC 2015 for the web these days? I know that PNG has the color a bit better than JPEG files. How about SVG?

  What is your recommendation?

  Thank you

  For modern websites of today, vectors are now better saved in SVG. As long as you use the last CC 2015, use file > export to create the SVG (which is newer than the file > save under). It will yield a smaller SVG files.

  Better, photos are saved in JPEG format.

  PNG are not "keep color" better. The JPEG and PNG24 support millions of colors, but a JPEG will be able to compress photographic details better, if you end up with a file of faster loading.

  For HTML Email SVG is not appropriate, so I use PNG or GIF instead (whichever is smaller) to the line drawings in general I want to save it as SVG.

• Best app for the batch processing of photos for the web?

  I would like to know what is the best application for batch processing photos for the web quickly and easily. I'm a web editor and often need to resize, compress, or crop several photos and would like a quick way to configure the basic parameters and processes for example 20 pictures at once. Basically, I'm looking for something with the ability to FastStone Photo Resizer (I'm on a Mac and cannot use FastStone). I remember an once suggested graphic designer LightRoom - would that be a good idea or Adobe has something else? Or maybe not Adobe at all?

  PhotoShop seems heavy for this purpose: it is ideal to make the photo woth that much at the time, but less large to do less with many pictures at once. I know that I can implement some sort of macro-thingie, but I would like to be able to quickly change settings such as the percentage of compression or the width in pixels.

  I don't need a lot of editing tools, mostly just work in pixels, resizing, compression or cropping and save for the web in .jpg and .png - and Mac.

  I hope someone here can guide me in the right direction.

  Hi eval

  I think the best thing for you is Adobe photoshop elements, cover in simple not expensive and all what you want

  Photo Editor software & tools | Adobe Photoshop Elements 14

  concerning

• I need to create combinations of text and images for the web. How to do this in elements or do I need Photoshop for this feature?

  I need to create combinations of text and images for the web. How to do this in elements or do I need Photoshop for this feature?  Please advise!

  slynn5236 wrote:

  I need to create combinations of text and images for the web. How to do this in elements or do I need Photoshop for this feature?  Please advise!

  You can do in PSE.

  1. Do the math to see how much space you'll need on your canvas to the image and text.
  2. Navigate to the file queue > new.blank. Enter the width & height, background color, resolution 72 px / in. It is your canvas, and in the layers palette will be the background layer.
  3. Copy and paste the image. It turns on a separate layer
  4. Activate the tool move, position the image and resize if necessary
  5. Activate the text tool, and then type your text. It will be on a separate so layer
  6. Position the text.
  7. Flatten layers and go to file > save for web. I'm usually on the long side about 800 px. Don't forget to check "constrain proportions". Adjust the quality slider to suit. You will probably want the type of JPEG file for web work.

• What are the recommended settings for the export of photos for the web?

  I am a photographer, if the images would be used for my blog... and still need of decent looks.
  They are also the images that I approach clients, again, they need for decent, but would be the right size for the web.
  I played a bit, and when we maintain quality"to 100%, but the setting at 72 dpi, the image remains the same size at 300 dpi.
  So I got the quality up to 50%, but even slight vignetting seemed absolutely horrible. (Highly visible sections of different colors.)
  So now I'm stuck.
  72 dpi and 300 dpi made no difference in size (cannot explain this one.)
  100% quality seemed fine but was too big for the web.
  50% quality was mediocre at best.
  Any suggestions? What is the standard practice?
  Thanks in advance.

  I would use a quality of 70-80 and also resize the image under 'Image size' for example, you pick a long edge of (for example) 1200 pixels.

  The ppi (dpi not) makes absolutely no difference, it's completely out of words and useless in this situation, as you found it. Just ignore it.

• What happened to the image field when you create a field of type of image for the Web application?

  What happened to the image field when you create a field of type of image for the Web application?

  The answer is that the point of the IMAGE has been changed to the MEDIA.

  Sorry, Ian, what research for this discussion, I got no results. All good and thanks for the carillon. Hope everything goes well.

  Mouma