Factory restore fails on my p6754y to the same percentage of completion

Similar Questions

• System restore failed, registry damaged, signature of the problem 07: O, s is not installed

  It, s a Dell Vista. (Initially WINDOWS 7). Does not start. Comes with Startup Repair tool.

  System restore failed, damaged, registry problem Signature 07: No O, s installed.

  Choice 1 or q: beep.

  Check memory problems: no problem dedected, goes back to the Startup Repair

  Help

  Hello

  1 have had any changes made on the computer before the show?

  2. What is the full and exact error message?

  3. How have you tried to do a system restore?

  Method 1:

  I suggest you to refer to the article and see if it helps:

  Windows Vista or Windows 7 unbootable, and the Startup Repair tool does not resolve the problem

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/934540

  Method 2:

  Check the link and see if it helps:

  Pick up the pieces after a computer crash

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/picking-up-the-pieces-after-a-computer-crash

  Let us know if it helps.

• System restore failed: no changes made to the computer (Windows XP sp3)

  Hello. When I use the system restore, the program looks good until you restart. Next, I get a Sys Res window that says simply "system restore was not entirely successful. No changes have been made to your computer. »

  The help file repeated that the Sys res window.

  I made sure that the system restore service is, in fact, running. Also the Message Center does not appear to give any errors related to the system restore.

  I tried several restore points the past two days, including a checkpoint of the system.

  The rest of my computer works like a charm, save a program that I really need work. I want to go back a few edits I made (which had nothing to do with the programs of bricks) to see if for some reason, it would work. Any help appreciated. Thanks in advance.

  I understand that you use Norton or McAfee, but I stick my standard "System Restore does not" answer for you to read and meditate.

  Microsoft suggests that if SR does not behave, sometimes it will behave if you start in Mode safe then give a whirl.  It could also be that your SR is reached, you must reinstall (you don't have to reinstall XP - only the part of SR).

  Here you go:

  What is your system brand and model?
  What is your Version of XP and the Service Pack?

  The afflicted system has a working CD/DVD (internal or external) drive?

  You have a genuine XP installation CD bootable, which is the same Service as your installed Service Pack (this is not the same as any recovery CD provided with your system)?

  Describe your current antivirus and software anti malware situation: McAfee, Norton, Spybot, AVG, Avira!, Defender, ZoneAlarm, PC Tools, MSE, Comodo, etc..
  What is the issue that you are experiencing that you think that the system restore will be remedied (or you are just convenient)?  Remember that the system restore is not a time machine.

  Have you ever used the system restore to restore your system in the past?

  Describe exactly what happens when you try to perform a system restore and the error messages you see which indicates that it does not work.

  Some tools Anti Virus 'protect' your system so that they will not allow a restore of the system work properly.

  For example, if you use Norton/Symantec products, you will see a message like this:
  Restoration incomplete. Your computer cannot be restored...
  It is also a popular Symantec problem (well, I'll be polite and call an "undocumented feature"...), they wrote an article about it:
  http://Service1.Symantec.com/support/sharedtech.nsf/pfdocs/2005113009323013
  According to what you use for malware protection, you may need to disable the product temporarily, do the system restore and then turn the products light up again when the system restore is complete.
  Sometimes you need start your system in Mode safe and so that your protection programs are not running, and then do the system restore.  Tips from Microsoft in some of their articles that if the system restore does not restore your computer, start in Safe Mode, and then run the system restore.  It works for some configurations.
  System Restore is sometimes so afflicted or Restore Points are suspicious, the best solution is to reinstall your system restore.  This will remove the old Restore Points, but sometimes it's the only way to fix a broken system restore.  You don't have to reinstall XP, only the part of system restore.
  That can leave you with your problem of unspecified origin that you hope the system restore will fix (using a system restore is usually not equivalent to fixing the problem though).
  Give these ideas some consideration if they apply to you.
  Sometimes malicious will afflict your system restore to prevent you to find and remove malware.  It would much rather you trick into thinking that you need to repair or reinstall your XP when it is not necessary.
  No matter what you use for protection against malware, I do so and then only begin to solve any problems:
  Download, install, update and do a full scan with these free malware detection programs can solve any problems:
  Malwarebytes (MMFA): http://malwarebytes.org/
  SUPERAntiSpyware: (SAS): http://www.superantispyware.com/
  It can be uninstalled later if you wish.
  The scans by operating clean, reboot, test and we can fix any other issues.

• Copied Factory.wim deployment on multiple machines of the same model (Optiplex 990)

  Hi all

  I have Optiplex 990 3 machines with hardware identical configs. Two of the machines had their recovery partitions crushed over the last re - install Windows. However, one of the machines has the recovery intact with the Factory.wim partition.

  I was going to copy the Factory.wim of this machine to a bootable USB key and use a wim file to restore the other two with new hard disks. Could their be a problem this other that maybe change machines restored to use the license windows for this machine? Could their be any problem of SID it?

  Hi Bryguy21,

  There is no licensing problem with what you want to do as far as Windows is the same flavor on each of them.

• Failed to load XP on the same computer using the product key on the case of the CPU.

  I uninstalled XP and tried to load Window 7 s. had driver problems. Let down. Now I can't reinstall XP on the same computer using the product key on the case. I get a message "invalid Key". It's a Dell PC 6 years, if that matters.

  As I said, you will need the manufacturer's recovery disk, or disk OEM System Builder.

  Do you have which drive tried to use?

  You may be able to borrow a disk OEMSB from a friend - or you may be able to order the Dell recovery disks (they are cheap).

• How did the same predicate is completed access and filter?

  SELECT select, j.job_title, d.department_name

  OF e hr.employees, hr.departments d, hr.jobs j

  WHERE e.department_id = d.department_id

  AND e.job_id = j.job_id

  AND select LIKE 'a % ';

  Execution plan

  ----------------------------------------------------------

  Hash value of plan: 975837011

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | 3. 189. 7 (15) | 00:00:01 |

  |* 1 | HASH JOIN | 3. 189. 7 (15) | 00:00:01 |

  |* 2 | HASH JOIN | 3. 141. 5 (20) | 00:00:01 |

  | 3. TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | EMPLOYEES | 3. 60. 2 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  |* 4 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | EMP_NAME_IX | 3 | | 1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  | 5. TABLE ACCESS FULL | JOBS | 19. 513. 2 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  | 6. TABLE ACCESS FULL | DEPARTMENTS | 27. 432. 2 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  1 - access("E".") DEPARTMENT_ID "=" D ". ("" DEPARTMENT_ID ")

  2 - access("E".") JOB_ID '=' J '. ("' JOB_ID ')

  4 - access ("E". "Last_name" LIKE 'A %') "

  filter ("E". "LAST_NAME" LIKE 'A %') "

  I understand not only how to select column is evaluated by the access and filter? Can someone there explain please? Or recommend me an article or document that explain this predicate excatly explains to explain the plan?

  Thanks in advance.

  Near NightWing.

  I believe that the predicate can be used to access THE index entries and if entries of access could include potentially "false positives" then filtering is required to remove the FPs.

  This filtering can be done in the same step of the operation (such as access) or as an extra step.

  My apologies, this has become much longer and more detailed that I intended it to be. :-(

  If I understand correctly,

  In terms of the explanation of the path, each step can include access and filtering process for "entries" (index or line). In the plan to explain the predicate section shows Information the use of predicate for step 'matching. "

  Some predicates can be "used" to ACCESS (ing) the entries, while the same or additional predicates (or even other) can be "used" to FILTER (ing) access entries (which have been consulted, but the optimizer is not sure that EACH AACCESSed entry is indeed a part of final result set). In such cases optimizer applies filtering predicate also during the operation stage. The optimizer can sometime even add additional operation steps or predicate [almost like a short circuit]

  So, using our previous configuration, allow us to run test cases.

  In this query we use AS predicate but the operand does NOT contain any 'wild' character In this case INDEX RANGE SCAN is performed, but since there is no wild characters are involved we can be sure that each entry using this predicate is indeed part of the final result set. This predicate Section shows that the predicate is used ONLY to access (index) entries.

  We know that the result set of this query is NULL lines.

  > explain plan for select v1 of tst where v1 as "A".

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |           |     1.     7.     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  |*  1 |  INDEX RANGE SCAN | TSTV1_IDX |     1.     7.     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  1 - access ("V1" = 'A')

  However, in this application, there is a wildcard character in the predicate, so while the INDEX RANGE SCAN step access entries using this predicate, it could potentially access entries that can be part of the final result set. So in the SAME step of the INDEX RANGE SCAN operation the predicate is also used for filtering. Since this is the only predicate, it may seem redundant.

  > explain plan for select v1 of tst where v1 like 'a % '.

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |           |    24.   168.     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  |*  1 |  INDEX RANGE SCAN | TSTV1_IDX |    24.   168.     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  1 - access ("V1" LIKE 'A %')

  filter ("V1" LIKE 'A %')

  If we add an another predicate as below (also includes wild character), it gets interesting. INDEX RANGE SCAN step performs two access AND filtering.

  Please note that the predicate 'V1' AS '%' is used to ACCESS and FILTER, fine FILTER uses additional predicates.

  > explain plan for select v1 of tst where v1 like 'A %' and v1 as "%c".

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |           |     1.     7.     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  |*  1 |  INDEX RANGE SCAN | TSTV1_IDX |     1.     7.     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  1 - access ("V1" LIKE 'A %')

  filter ("V1" IS NOT NULL AND "V1" LIKE 'A %') AND "V1" LIKE "%c"

  When we change the predicate 'V1' LIKE 'A %' to 'V1' > 'A', then we can use the predicate to access entries AND do not forget that each entry using this predicate are

  Indeed part of results if other predicates are met. In this case optimizer of must not filter on 'V1' > 'A', wherever it must continue to filter on 'V1' LIKE '%c '.

  > explain plan for select v1 of tst where v1 > 'A' and v1 as "%c".

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |           |     1.     7.     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  |*  1 |  INDEX RANGE SCAN | TSTV1_IDX |     1.     7.     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  1 - access("V1">'A')

  filter ("V1" IS NOT NULL AND "V1" LIKE "%c")

  Of course, if we do the predicate so that the entries are NOT accessible using the predicate, then for INDEX FULL SCAN (no Beach cannot be determined) operation comes into play and the predicate of ACCESS goes. All entries in the index are ALWAYS accessible (predicate applied no ACCESS) and FILTER predicate is applied.

  > explain plan for select v1 of tst where v1 like '%c %'

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |           |     1.     8 S     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  |*  1 |  INDEX SCAN FULL | TSTV1_IDX |     1.     8 S     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  1 - filter ("V1" IS NOT NULL AND "V1" LIKE '%A%c')

  For the example proposed by JL, two predicates are used in the INDEX RANGE SCAN step to access THE entries. In addition, we can be sure that all entries that are accessible with success using this predicate can be included in the final result set. So not necessary filtering.

  > explain plan for select v1 of tst where v1 > 'A' and v1<>

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |           |    24.   168.     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  |*  1 |  INDEX RANGE SCAN | TSTV1_IDX |    24.   168.     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  1 - access("V1">'A' AND "V1")<>

  Interestingly, when we change the 'B' in the previous query to 'A', change predicates of inequality, so we cannot use index. Optimizer knows this and switches for FTS and introduced an additional step of operation FILTER. In my view, the filter predicate can be applied in operation of FTS. Additional FILTER stage is the predicate as FALSE hard-coded value. It does not yet use our predicate of the query.

  Well, don't know if he actually bypasses the operation of FTS. SQL trace can indicate that.

  > explain plan for select v1 of tst where v1 > 'A' and v1<>

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |      |     1.     8 S     0 (0) |          |

  |*  1 |  FILTER |      |       |       |            |          |

  |   2.   TABLE ACCESS FULL | TST |    49.   343.     3 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  1 - filter (NULL IS NOT NULL AND NULL IS NOT NULL)

  Subsequently, optimizer decides to use the INDEX RANGE SCAN, even if the predicate is always an inequality. Go figure...

  > explain plan for select v1 of tst where v1 > 'A' and v1<=>

  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |

  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |           |     1.     8 S     0 (0) |          |

  |*  1 |  FILTER |           |       |       |            |          |

  |*  2 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN | TSTV1_IDX |     1.     8 S     0 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  1 - filter (NULL IS NOT NULL)

  2 - access("V1">'A' AND "V1")<>

  As others have said, it is difficult to understand and predict the path, but fortunately Oracle doing the right thing, 99% of the time.

  VR

  Sudhakar

• my system restore gives me an error message, I'm ready to just do a factory restore, but it will not accomplish the restoration for some reason any!

  I did somehow something wrong and all seeking a srnt file for me through my business network that I managed to sync all my files via Adobe reader that supports only those of the doc and therefore prevents me to open any file or program etc. of my application files.  I am at my wits end I need to this computer, I'm in the middle of the tender of work and my spec and plans are those files and also my full runs super slow or not at all, nothing wants to establish a connection - my home page, my Web browser is just nothing is right, so I just want to go back to the box start. HEPL!

  Hi stephen almond,.

  Thanks for posting that query you in Microsoft Communities. You are not able to perform the system restore. Provide the following information:

  ·         What version of the operating system is installed on the computer?

  ·         Did you do changes on the computer before the show?

  ·         You get the error message?

  ·         Work on a domain?

  Performs a search using the Microsoft safety scanner.

  http://www.Microsoft.com/security/scanner/en-us/default.aspx

  Note: The data files that are infected must be cleaned only by removing the file completely, which means that there is a risk of data loss.

  Answer with the information required to help more.

  Thank you.

• If my monthly payment fails, my apps stop at the same time?

  With the security breach, we may have to change our credit cards.  Would be - for this reason or another, a monthly payment fails, our CC applications stop working at once, or do we receive any period of grace for the payment of correct?  Anyone know this?

  In the event of non-payment, Adobe server tries to take the payment every 7 days (14/07/21) and the account will work up to 21 days.

  21st day, hope that answers your question, he goes to the Suspended state.

• K1 "unrecoverable error bootloader (0 x 19000008) after the factory restore".

  Having some problems with my K1 for a while & finally decided to do a factory restore and start over. Fact the factory restore (exactly like I had to with my android phone a couple of weeks) & now he jumped to the top with

  «Erase Userdata...»

  Boot loader fatal error (0 x 19000008)

  He sat there for a while. I tried to hold the power button, but nothing. This tablet has been updated to the latest version, it has not rooted or anything else. Just completely factory & updated. The problems I had when I decided to restore it was running mostly just super slow. Took forever to get the apps to arrive on the screen & such things. Thought I just having too much junk previously installed on it, so I tried to restore it & start over. Bad idea! Any idea? My 2 weeks im slammed all day every day & cant slow to call assistance & wait always hold to try & fix it (assuming that they can even repair). Would be delighted to hear that its an easy fix but I'm sure used to be the case. I bought it back in November 2011, so its only 6 months old.

  Hi Javahead

  How many times have you tried to restart since this error?

  Recently, I did the same thing after that my front cam went wrong. I got the same error. But after a few reboots and maybe wait a few minutes before trying again. Finally, he went through the process and completed successfully.

• For Satellite C660 factory restore

  I installed windows 7 pro on my laptop which made my longer laptop for start and stop time down and little slow. now I just want to go back to the factory restore, how can I do this. the pre-installed recovery partition is not show in "my computer".

  Thank you very much

  You cannot start after installation of operating system HARD drive recovery clean facility more.
  You can do this via recovery DVD only.

  Did you create this disc by following the advice of Toshibas rappelling recovery or document s user manual?

  If you have this drive please use it for recovery image installation. If you n t have it you have a big problem today.

• How to prevent the WIndows Activation when you restore the material in the same FVO

  I just want to know, on a Vmware ESX 3i 3.5.0 on a hard disk crash scenario, when only the hard drive has been replaced.   How yo make an ovf import (backup) that requires no windows activation.

  Please see my answer to your previous question (Re: still Windows Activation required even if the restore of a virtual server on the same hardware)

  André

• I was using my MacBook today and it crashed and the dock turned silv, I restarted the mac and it was always the same, then I loaded the disk utility and checked the disk and it says disk is fine. It flashes inconsistently gray and the dock turned

  I was using my MacBook today and it crashed and the dock turned silver, I restarted the mac and it was always the same, then I loaded the disk utility and checked the disk and it says disk is fine. It flashes inconsistently gray and the dock has transformed money! I tried to restore Mac OS and then also the same!
  OS El Capitan

  This can help:

  Reboot safe mode (it is a slow process):

  -stop of the mac

  -Start up the mac in shift, press and hold until you see appear it to progress bar, so you can let go

  -When everything started, connect

  -Once connected, stop the mac once again, nothing else is necessary.

  -restart normally.

  Lex

  PS: This clears all system caches.

• Upgrade CC, could not load the installer saying could not access a critical file (error 46). I have used the cleaning tool that removed the CC Office application which could then download showing the same message as before

  I have Windows 7 and CC Photoshop and Lightroom. I closed all Adobe applications before downloading the upgrade. It failed after about 50% and showed error 46 and said that it is impossible to access the critical files/directory. I then used CC Cleaner and it has removed the LTCC which I then started to download. The operation failed at about 50%, citing the same error and the message that I received during the upgrade.

  Please check: cannot install Creative cloud of installation - 46 error code.

  You try to delete the file folder and try to reinstall the application.

• [ADF, JDev 12.1.3] Fragment 3 sections (each with a grid + form): best solution to commit / rollback all changes at the same time?

  Hallo,

  I need to create a fragment like page2create.jsff in this picture http://digilander.libero.it/flattit82/OTN_FILES/TotalCommRoll.png

  You kindly could give me some advice on how to achieve the result shown in the picture?

  Could you a panel tabs help keep the 3 sections on the same page and making it simpler handling of commit / rollback as requested?

  Thank you

  Federico

  Hello

  Yes, you can use panelTabbed to create this type of layout and for the handling of commit or rollback

  1. If you want to commit and a rollback for all 3 tabs then place these buttons (Commit and Rollback) outside panelTabbed and allow the creation, update and deletion on all tabs at the same time, after completing the user operation can use commit or rollback for all tabs

  2. If you want to commit separate and operation of catering for the different tab, then create and modify mode disable other tabs except the active tab, and only after a commit or rollback in the current tab allow the user to navigate to the different tab

  Thank you

• ASM will support Extern and up at the same time?

  I'm confused.  If we have a group of redundant San who maintain the ASM disk group and our type is set to Extern, we put our confidence in snapshots, replication, and so on in the hands of the SAN.

  Can you have Extern and high?  You can have ASM diskgroup that lies on the SAN but too high?

  If you can not, then if you raised, and these starts on the SAN, what's the difference?  Are not often required database on a San with a server on the front-end server?

  ASM diskgroup redundancy and redundancy SAN are not the same and work completely different. You cannot use extern ASM and redundancy high at the same time.

  A San doesn't know anything about Oracle database files and redundancy is usually accomplished in RAID. ASM is not RAID and does not duplicate complete records. ASM data redundancy is based on failure of disk groups and file extensions. ASM knows by the way of the Oracle database files and automatically adjusts the deletion of data, which does not have a SAN. ASM has also the advantage of the storage size can be adjusted dynamically when the storage is online, without having to rebuild your storage devices. Rebuild or expand a SAN solution based RAID usually means to reset the storage.

  Beware of the features of snapshot and SAN replication because they cannot provide full backup or redundancy if you lose the full storage.